1
|
Sinn BV, Sychra K, Untch M, Karn T, van Mackelenbergh M, Huober J, Schmitt W, Marmé F, Schem C, Solbach C, Stickeler E, Tesch H, Fasching PA, Schneeweiss A, Müller V, Holtschmidt J, Nekljudova V, Loibl S, Denkert C. On-treatment biopsies to predict response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy for breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res 2024; 26:138. [PMID: 39317942 PMCID: PMC11423510 DOI: 10.1186/s13058-024-01883-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/27/2024] [Accepted: 08/19/2024] [Indexed: 09/26/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Patients with pathologic complete response (pCR) to neoadjuvant chemotherapy for invasive breast cancer (BC) have better outcomes, potentially warranting less extensive surgical and systemic treatments. Early prediction of treatment response could aid in adapting therapies. METHODS On-treatment biopsies from 297 patients with invasive BC in three randomized, prospective neoadjuvant trials were assessed (GeparQuattro, GeparQuinto, GeparSixto). BC quantity, tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs), and the proliferation marker Ki-67 were compared to pre-treatment samples. The study investigated the correlation between residual cancer, changes in Ki-67 and TILs, and their impact on pathologic complete response (pCR) and disease-free survival (DFS). RESULTS Among the 297 samples, 138 (46%) were hormone receptor-positive (HR+)/human epidermal growth factor 2-negative (HER2-), 87 (29%) were triple-negative (TNBC), and 72 (24%) were HER2+. Invasive tumor cells were found in 70% of on-treatment biopsies, with varying rates across subtypes (HR+/HER2-: 84%, TNBC: 62%, HER2+: 51%; p < 0.001). Patients with residual tumor on-treatment had an 8% pCR rate post-treatment (HR+/HER2-: 3%, TNBC: 19%, HER2+: 11%), while those without any invasive tumor had a 50% pCR rate (HR+/HER2-: 27%; TNBC: 48%, HER2+: 66%). Sensitivity for predicting residual disease was 0.81, with positive and negative predictive values of 0.92 and 0.50, respectively. Increasing TILs from baseline to on-treatment biopsy (if residual tumor was present) were linked to higher pCR likelihood in the overall cohort (OR 1.034, 95% CI 1.013-1.056 per % increase; p = 0.001) and with a longer DFS in TNBC (HR 0.980, 95% CI 0.963-0.997 per % increase; p = 0.026). Persisting or increased Ki-67 was associated with with lower pCR probability in the overall cohort (OR 0.957, 95% CI 0.928-0.986; p = 0.004) and shorter DFS in TNBC (HR 1.023, 95% CI 1.001-1.047; p = 0.04). CONCLUSION On-treatment biopsies can predict patients unlikely to achieve pCR post-therapy. This could facilitate therapy adjustments for TNBC or HER2 + BC. They also might offer insights into therapy resistance mechanisms. Future research should explore whether standardized or expanded sampling enhances the accuracy of on-treatment biopsy procedures. Trial registration GeparQuattro (EudraCT 2005-001546-17), GeparQuinto (EudraCT 2006-005834-19) and GeparSixto (EudraCT 2011-000553-23).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bruno Valentin Sinn
- Department of Pathology, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, 10117, Berlin, Germany.
| | - Katharina Sychra
- Department of Pathology, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, 10117, Berlin, Germany
| | - Michael Untch
- Department of Gynecology, Helios Kliniken Berlin-Buch, Berlin, Germany
| | - Thomas Karn
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Goethe-University, Frankfurt, Germany
- UCT-University Cancer Center, Frankfurt-Marburg, Germany
| | | | - Jens Huober
- Breast Center St. Gallen, Kantonsspital St. Gallen, St. Gallen, Switzerland
| | - Wolfgang Schmitt
- Department of Pathology, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, 10117, Berlin, Germany
| | - Frederik Marmé
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Medical Faculty Mannheim, Heidelberg University, University Hospital Mannheim, Mannheim, Germany
| | | | - Christine Solbach
- Breast Center, Universitätsklinikum Frankfurt, Frankfurt, Germany
- UCT-University Cancer Center, Frankfurt-Marburg, Germany
| | - Elmar Stickeler
- Department of Gynecology, Uniklinik RWTH Aachen, Aachen, Germany
| | - Hans Tesch
- Centrum für Hämatologie und Onkologie Bethanien, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
| | - Peter A Fasching
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital Erlangen, Erlangen, Germany
| | | | - Volkmar Müller
- Department of Gynecology, Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | | | | | - Sibylle Loibl
- German Breast Group, Neu-Isenburg, Germany
- UCT-University Cancer Center, Frankfurt-Marburg, Germany
| | - Carsten Denkert
- Department of Pathology, Philipps-University Marburg and University Hospital Marburg (UKGM), Marburg, Germany
- UCT-University Cancer Center, Frankfurt-Marburg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Chin K, Landén AH, Kovács A, Wärnberg F, Ekholm M, Karlsson P, Olofsson Bagge R. Tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes as a predictor of axillary and primary tumor pathological response after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in patients with breast cancer: a retrospective cohort study. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2024; 207:49-63. [PMID: 38703286 PMCID: PMC11230953 DOI: 10.1007/s10549-024-07334-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/31/2023] [Accepted: 04/08/2024] [Indexed: 05/06/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE Tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) can predict complete pathological response (pCR) of tumor in the breast but not so well-defined in the axilla after neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Since axillary surgery is being increasingly de-escalated after NACT, we aimed to investigate the relationship between TILs and pCR in the axilla and breast, as well as survival amongst NACT patients. METHODS Clinicopathological data on patients who underwent NACT between 2013 and 2020 were retrospectively examined. Specifically, pre-TILs (before NACT), post-TILs (after NACT) and ΔTIL (changes in TILs) were assessed. Primary endpoint was pCR and secondary endpoints were breast cancer-free interval (BCFI) and overall survival (OS). RESULTS Two hundred and twenty patients with nodal metastases were included. Overall axillary and breast pCR rates were 42.7% (94/220) and 39.1% (86/220), respectively, whereas the combined pCR rate was 32.7% (72/220). High pre-TILs (OR 2.03, 95% CI 1.02-4.05; p = 0.04) predicted axillary pCR whereas, high post-TILs (OR 0.33, 95% CI 0.14-0.76; p = 0.009) and increased ΔTILs (OR 0.25, 95% CI 0.08-0.79; p = 0.02) predicted non-axillary pCR. TILs were not a significant predictor for BCFI and OS. CONCLUSIONS This study supports the potential use of pre-TILs to select initially node-positive patients for axillary surgical de-escalation after NACT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kian Chin
- Institute of Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy at Gothenburg University, Gothenburg, Sweden.
- Department of Surgery, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Region Västra Götaland, Gothenburg, Sweden.
| | - Amalia H Landén
- Department of Oncology, Institute of Clinical Sciences in Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - Anikó Kovács
- Department of Clinical Pathology, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - Fredrik Wärnberg
- Institute of Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy at Gothenburg University, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - Maria Ekholm
- Department of Oncology, Ryhov County Hospital, Jönköping, Sweden
- Department of Biomedical and Clinical Sciences, Division of Oncology, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden
| | - Per Karlsson
- Department of Oncology, Institute of Clinical Sciences in Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - Roger Olofsson Bagge
- Institute of Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy at Gothenburg University, Gothenburg, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Flippot R, Teixeira M, Rey-Cardenas M, Carril-Ajuria L, Rainho L, Naoun N, Jouniaux JM, Boselli L, Naigeon M, Danlos FX, Escudier B, Scoazec JY, Cassard L, Albiges L, Chaput N. B cells and the coordination of immune checkpoint inhibitor response in patients with solid tumors. J Immunother Cancer 2024; 12:e008636. [PMID: 38631710 PMCID: PMC11029261 DOI: 10.1136/jitc-2023-008636] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 03/31/2024] [Indexed: 04/19/2024] Open
Abstract
Immunotherapy profoundly changed the landscape of cancer therapy by providing long-lasting responses in subsets of patients and is now the standard of care in several solid tumor types. However, immunotherapy activity beyond conventional immune checkpoint inhibition is plateauing, and biomarkers are overall lacking to guide treatment selection. Most studies have focused on T cell engagement and response, but there is a growing evidence that B cells may be key players in the establishment of an organized immune response, notably through tertiary lymphoid structures. Mechanisms of B cell response include antibody-dependent cellular cytotoxicity and phagocytosis, promotion of CD4+ and CD8+ T cell activation, maintenance of antitumor immune memory. In several solid tumor types, higher levels of B cells, specific B cell subpopulations, or the presence of tertiary lymphoid structures have been associated with improved outcomes on immune checkpoint inhibitors. The fate of B cell subpopulations may be widely influenced by the cytokine milieu, with versatile roles for B-specific cytokines B cell activating factor and B cell attracting chemokine-1/CXCL13, and a master regulatory role for IL-10. Roles of B cell-specific immune checkpoints such as TIM-1 are emerging and could represent potential therapeutic targets. Overall, the expanding field of B cells in solid tumors of holds promise for the improvement of current immunotherapy strategies and patient selection.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ronan Flippot
- Department of Medical Oncology, Gustave Roussy, Université Paris Saclay, Villejuif, France
- Immunomonitoring Laboratory, CNRS3655 & INSERM US23, Université Paris-Saclay, Villejuif, France
| | - Marcus Teixeira
- Department of Medical Oncology, Gustave Roussy, Université Paris Saclay, Villejuif, France
- Immunomonitoring Laboratory, CNRS3655 & INSERM US23, Université Paris-Saclay, Villejuif, France
| | - Macarena Rey-Cardenas
- Department of Medical Oncology, Gustave Roussy, Université Paris Saclay, Villejuif, France
- Immunomonitoring Laboratory, CNRS3655 & INSERM US23, Université Paris-Saclay, Villejuif, France
| | - Lucia Carril-Ajuria
- Department of Medical Oncology, Gustave Roussy, Université Paris Saclay, Villejuif, France
- Immunomonitoring Laboratory, CNRS3655 & INSERM US23, Université Paris-Saclay, Villejuif, France
- Medical Oncology, CHU Brugmann, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Larissa Rainho
- Department of Medical Oncology, Gustave Roussy, Université Paris Saclay, Villejuif, France
- Immunomonitoring Laboratory, CNRS3655 & INSERM US23, Université Paris-Saclay, Villejuif, France
| | - Natacha Naoun
- Department of Medical Oncology, Gustave Roussy, Université Paris Saclay, Villejuif, France
| | - Jean-Mehdi Jouniaux
- Immunomonitoring Laboratory, CNRS3655 & INSERM US23, Université Paris-Saclay, Villejuif, France
| | - Lisa Boselli
- Immunomonitoring Laboratory, CNRS3655 & INSERM US23, Université Paris-Saclay, Villejuif, France
| | - Marie Naigeon
- Immunomonitoring Laboratory, CNRS3655 & INSERM US23, Université Paris-Saclay, Villejuif, France
| | - Francois-Xavier Danlos
- LRTI, INSERM U1015, Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France
- Drug Development Department, Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France
| | - Bernard Escudier
- Department of Medical Oncology, Gustave Roussy, Université Paris Saclay, Villejuif, France
| | | | - Lydie Cassard
- Immunomonitoring Laboratory, CNRS3655 & INSERM US23, Université Paris-Saclay, Villejuif, France
| | - Laurence Albiges
- Department of Medical Oncology, Gustave Roussy, Université Paris Saclay, Villejuif, France
- Immunomonitoring Laboratory, CNRS3655 & INSERM US23, Université Paris-Saclay, Villejuif, France
| | - Nathalie Chaput
- Immunomonitoring Laboratory, CNRS3655 & INSERM US23, Université Paris-Saclay, Villejuif, France
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
de Mello RA, Perez KR, Vazquez TP. Current and future trends in neoadjuvant immunotherapy for the treatment of triple-negative breast cancer. Immunotherapy 2024; 16:257-266. [PMID: 38197149 DOI: 10.2217/imt-2022-0277] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/11/2024] Open
Abstract
Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) comprises 15-20% of all breast cancers (BC). Lacking targeted therapy options, TNBC becomes the focal point of clinical investigations aiming not only to identify drugs with enhanced response potential but also to uncover new immunological and/or metabolic pathways conducive to more effective treatments. Currently, neoadjuvant treatment for TNBC relies on standard chemotherapy in conjunction with immunotherapy, given the improved response observed with this drug combination. This review delves into the latest therapeutic updates in TNBC treatment and explores potential advancements shaping the future landscape of this disease in the neoadjuvant setting.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ramon Andrade de Mello
- Department of Oncology, Oxford Cancer Center, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Churchill Hospital, OX3 7LE, Oxford, UK
- Department of Oncology, University of Oxford, OX3 7ER, Oxford, UK
- Post Graduation Program in Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Nine of July University, 015250-000, São Paulo, Brazil
| | - Kátia Roque Perez
- Post Graduation Program in Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Nine of July University, 015250-000, São Paulo, Brazil
- Instituto Nacional de Enfermedades Neoplasicas, Lima, Peru
| | - Thais Pérez Vazquez
- São Paulo Cancer Institute, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, 01246-000, Brazil
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Wang S, Zhang Y, Ma X, Feng Y. Function and mechanism of GBP1 in the development and progression of cervical cancer. J Transl Med 2024; 22:11. [PMID: 38167153 PMCID: PMC10763113 DOI: 10.1186/s12967-023-04837-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/09/2023] [Accepted: 12/26/2023] [Indexed: 01/05/2024] Open
Abstract
Guanylate binding protein 1 (GBP1) is the most concerned member of the GBP family, which has a series of effects such as anti-infection and anti-angiogenesis. Its role in malignant tumors including cervical cancer is still controversial. We aim to explore the effects of GBP1 on cervical cancer through bioinformatics and related experiments. In this study, we first found that GBP1 was generally expressed in cervical cancer in various online databases and was closely related to immune invasion. Secondly, we used multicolor immunofluorescence technology to verify the expression of GBP1 in cervical cancer tissues and its relationship with immune invasion, and explored its relationship with the prognosis of patients with cervical cancer. Knockdown and overexpression assays of GBP1 in vitro were used to prove GBP1 as a potential oncogene of cervical cancer, and its carcinogenicity was verified by in vivo experiment. In order to explore the potential mechanism of GBP1 in promoting cancer, RNA-seq was performed on GBP1 overexpression and knockdown expression cell lines, and GBP1 knockdown and overexpression were found to be associated with many RNA alternative splicing events, suggesting that GBP1 maybe a RNA binding protein (RBP) which affect the biological characteristics of cervical cancer cells through the alternative splicing pathway. However, the later RNA binding protein immunoprecipitation (RIP) assay proved that GBP1 was not a direct alternative splicing factor, while the co-immunoprecipitation (CoIP)-mass spectroscopy (MS) assay combined with protein protein interaction (PPI) analysis proved that 8 alternative splicing factors including Heterogeneous Nuclear Ribonucleoprotein K (HNRNPK) were interacting proteins of GBP1. Combined with the existing reports and the results of RNA-seq alternative splicing analysis, it is speculated that GBP1 may regulate the alternative splicing of CD44 protein by binding to interacting protein-HNRNPK, and thus play a role in promoting cancer in cervical cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Senyu Wang
- Clinical Laboratory Center, Cancer Hospital Affiliated to Xinjiang Medical University, Xinjiang, China
| | - Yajing Zhang
- Clinical Laboratory Center, Cancer Hospital Affiliated to Xinjiang Medical University, Xinjiang, China
| | - Xiumin Ma
- Clinical Laboratory Center, Cancer Hospital Affiliated to Xinjiang Medical University, Xinjiang, China.
| | - Yangchun Feng
- Clinical Laboratory Center, Cancer Hospital Affiliated to Xinjiang Medical University, Xinjiang, China.
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Capuozzo M, Celotto V, Santorsola M, Fabozzi A, Landi L, Ferrara F, Borzacchiello A, Granata V, Sabbatino F, Savarese G, Cascella M, Perri F, Ottaiano A. Emerging treatment approaches for triple-negative breast cancer. Med Oncol 2023; 41:5. [PMID: 38038783 DOI: 10.1007/s12032-023-02257-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/21/2023] [Accepted: 11/15/2023] [Indexed: 12/02/2023]
Abstract
Approximately, 15% of global breast cancer cases are diagnosed as triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC), identified as the most aggressive subtype due to the simultaneous absence of estrogen receptor, progesterone receptor, and HER2. This characteristic renders TNBC highly aggressive and challenging to treat, as it excludes the use of effective drugs such as hormone therapy and anti-HER2 agents. In this review, we explore standard therapies and recent emerging approaches for TNBC, including PARP inhibitors, immune checkpoint inhibitors, PI3K/AKT pathway inhibitors, and cytotoxin-conjugated antibodies. The mechanism of action of these drugs and their utilization in clinical practice is explained in a pragmatic and prospective manner, contextualized within the current landscape of standard therapies for this pathology. These advancements present a promising frontier for tailored interventions with the potential to significantly improve outcomes for TNBC patients. Interestingly, while TNBC poses a complex challenge, it also serves as a paradigm and an opportunity for translational research and innovative therapies in the field of oncology.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maurizio Capuozzo
- Pharmaceutical Department, ASL Napoli 3, Ercolano, 80056, Naples, Italy
| | - Venere Celotto
- Pharmaceutical Department, ASL Napoli 3, Ercolano, 80056, Naples, Italy
| | - Mariachiara Santorsola
- Istituto Nazionale Tumori di Napoli, IRCCS "G. Pascale", via M. Semmola, 80131, Naples, Italy
| | - Antonio Fabozzi
- Istituto Nazionale Tumori di Napoli, IRCCS "G. Pascale", via M. Semmola, 80131, Naples, Italy
| | - Loris Landi
- Sanitary District, Ds. 58 ASL Napoli 3, Pompei, 80045, Naples, Italy
| | - Francesco Ferrara
- Pharmaceutical Department, ASL Napoli 3, Via Dell'amicizia 22, Nola, 80035, Naples, Italy
| | - Assunta Borzacchiello
- Institute of Polymers, Composites and Biomaterials, National Research Council, IPCB-CNR, Naples, Italy
| | - Vincenza Granata
- Istituto Nazionale Tumori di Napoli, IRCCS "G. Pascale", via M. Semmola, 80131, Naples, Italy
| | - Francesco Sabbatino
- Oncology Unit, Department of Medicine, Surgery and Dentistry, University of Salerno, Baronissi, 84081, Salerno, Italy
| | - Giovanni Savarese
- AMES, Centro Polidiagnostico Strumentale Srl, Via Padre Carmine Fico 24, Casalnuovo Di, 80013, Naples, Italy
| | - Marco Cascella
- Istituto Nazionale Tumori di Napoli, IRCCS "G. Pascale", via M. Semmola, 80131, Naples, Italy
| | - Francesco Perri
- Istituto Nazionale Tumori di Napoli, IRCCS "G. Pascale", via M. Semmola, 80131, Naples, Italy
| | - Alessandro Ottaiano
- Istituto Nazionale Tumori di Napoli, IRCCS "G. Pascale", via M. Semmola, 80131, Naples, Italy.
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Castellano G, Giugliano F, Curigliano G, Marra A. Clinical utility of genomic signatures for the management of early and metastatic triple-negative breast cancer. Curr Opin Oncol 2023; 35:479-490. [PMID: 37621170 DOI: 10.1097/cco.0000000000000989] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 08/26/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW This comprehensive review aims to provide timely and relevant insights into the current therapeutic landscape for triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) and the molecular features underlying this subtype. It emphasizes the need for more reliable biomarkers to refine prognostication and optimize therapy, considering the aggressive nature of TNBC and its limited targeted treatment options. RECENT FINDINGS The review explores the multidisciplinary management of early TNBC, which typically involves systemic chemotherapy, surgery, and radiotherapy. It highlights the emergence of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitors, and antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs) as promising therapeutic strategies for TNBC. Recent clinical trials investigating the use of ICIs in combination with chemotherapy and the approval of pembrolizumab and atezolizumab for PD-L1-positive metastatic TNBC are discussed. The efficacy of PARP inhibitors and ADCs in treating TNBC patients with specific genetic alterations is also highlighted. SUMMARY The findings discussed in this review have significant implications for clinical practice and research in TNBC. The identification of distinct molecular subtypes through gene expression profiling has enabled a better understanding of TNBC heterogeneity and its clinical implications. This knowledge has the potential to guide treatment decisions, as different subtypes display varying responses to neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Furthermore, the review emphasizes the importance of developing reliable genomic and transcriptomic signatures as biomarkers to refine patient prognostication and optimize therapy selection in TNBC. Integrating these signatures into clinical practice may lead to more personalized treatment approaches, improving outcomes for TNBC patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Grazia Castellano
- Division of New Drugs and Early Drug Development, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS
- Department of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| | - Federica Giugliano
- Division of New Drugs and Early Drug Development, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS
- Department of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| | - Giuseppe Curigliano
- Division of New Drugs and Early Drug Development, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS
- Department of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| | - Antonio Marra
- Division of New Drugs and Early Drug Development, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Zhang J, Zhang M, Tian Q, Yang J. A novel model associated with tumor microenvironment on predicting prognosis and immunotherapy in triple negative breast cancer. Clin Exp Med 2023; 23:3867-3881. [PMID: 37219794 PMCID: PMC10618350 DOI: 10.1007/s10238-023-01090-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/24/2023] [Accepted: 05/11/2023] [Indexed: 05/24/2023]
Abstract
Triple negative breast cancer (TNBC) is the most aggressive and malignant subtype in breast cancer. Immunotherapy is a currently promising and effective treatment for TNBC, while not all patients are responsive. Therefore, it is necessary to explore novel biomarkers to screen sensitive populations for immunotherapy. All mRNA expression profiles of TNBC from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) database were clustered into two subgroups by analyzing tumor immune microenvironment (TIME) with single sample gene set enrichment analysis (ssGSEA). A risk score model was constructed based on differently expressed genes (DEGs) identified from two subgroups using Cox and Least Absolute Shrinkage and Selector Operation (LASSO) regression model. And it was validated by Kaplan-Meier analysis and Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) analysis in Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) and the Molecular Taxonomy of Breast Cancer International Consortium (METABRIC) databases. Multiplex immunofluorescence (mIF) and Immunohistochemical (IHC) staining were performed on clinical TNBC tissue samples. The relationship between risk score and immune checkpoint blockades (ICB) related signatures was further investigated, as well as the biological processes were performed by gene set enrichment analysis (GSEA). We obtained three DEGs positively related to prognosis and infiltrating immune cells in TNBC. Our risk score model could be an independent prognostic factor and the low risk group exhibited a prolonged overall survival (OS). Patients in low risk group were more likely to present a higher immune infiltration and stronger response to immunotherapy. GSEA revealed the model was associated with immune-related pathways. We constructed and validated a novel model based on three prognostic genes related to TIME in TNBC. The model contributed a robust signature that could predict the prognosis in TNBC, especially for the efficacy of immunotherapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Juan Zhang
- Cancer Center, The First Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an, China
- Precision Medicine Center, The First Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an, China
- Department of Medical Oncology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University, 277 Yanta Western Road, Xi'an, 710061, Shaanxi, China
| | - Mi Zhang
- Cancer Center, The First Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an, China
- Precision Medicine Center, The First Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an, China
- Department of Medical Oncology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University, 277 Yanta Western Road, Xi'an, 710061, Shaanxi, China
| | - Qi Tian
- Department of Medical Oncology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University, 277 Yanta Western Road, Xi'an, 710061, Shaanxi, China
| | - Jin Yang
- Cancer Center, The First Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an, China.
- Precision Medicine Center, The First Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an, China.
- Department of Medical Oncology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University, 277 Yanta Western Road, Xi'an, 710061, Shaanxi, China.
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Geršak K, Geršak BM, Gazić B, Klevišar Ivančič A, Drev P, Ružić Gorenjec N, Grašič Kuhar C. The Possible Role of Anti- and Protumor-Infiltrating Lymphocytes in Pathologic Complete Response in Early Breast Cancer Patients Treated with Neoadjuvant Systemic Therapy. Cancers (Basel) 2023; 15:4794. [PMID: 37835488 PMCID: PMC10571934 DOI: 10.3390/cancers15194794] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/18/2023] [Revised: 09/20/2023] [Accepted: 09/27/2023] [Indexed: 10/15/2023] Open
Abstract
The tumor microenvironment, composed of pro- and antitumor immune cells, affects cancer cell behavior. We aimed to evaluate whether tumor-infiltrating lymphocyte (TIL) density and TIL subtypes in core biopsies at the diagnosis of breast cancer patients could predict a pathologic complete response (pCR; ypT0/is ypN0) from neoadjuvant systemic therapy (NST). The TIL subtypes were determined based on the proportions of presumably antitumor (CD8+, CXCL13+) and protumor (PD-1+, FOXP3+) immune cells. A prospective, noninterventional study, including 171 participants undergoing NST, was performed. The median TIL density for the entire cohort was 10% (IQR: 3.5-23.8), and 59 (35%) patients achieved pCR. TIL density was positively associated with pCR (univariately and multivariably). In the multivariable logistic regression model, TIL density was an independent predictor of pCR (p = 0.012, OR 1.27; 95% CI 1.05-1.54) when controlled for age (p = 0.232), Ki-67 (p = 0.001), node-negative status (p = 0.024), and HER2+/triple negative vs. luminal B-like subtype (p < 0.001). In our sample, higher proportions of PD-1+ TILs and FOXP3+ TILs were associated with a higher probability of pCR but the association was not statistically significant and we could not make any conclusions on the direction of associations in the model with all four biomarkers. In the exploratory multivariable analysis, we showed that only higher CD8+ TILs were associated with pCR. In conclusion, TIL density and its subtypes are associated with pCR.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Klara Geršak
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Ljubljana, Vrazov Trg 2, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia (B.G.); (A.K.I.); (C.G.K.)
- Division of Medical Oncology, Institute of Oncology Ljubljana, Zaloška Cesta 2, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia
| | - Blaž Matija Geršak
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Ljubljana, Vrazov Trg 2, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia (B.G.); (A.K.I.); (C.G.K.)
| | - Barbara Gazić
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Ljubljana, Vrazov Trg 2, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia (B.G.); (A.K.I.); (C.G.K.)
- Department of Pathology, Institute of Oncology Ljubljana, Zaloška Cesta 2, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia;
| | - Andreja Klevišar Ivančič
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Ljubljana, Vrazov Trg 2, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia (B.G.); (A.K.I.); (C.G.K.)
- Department of Pathology, Institute of Oncology Ljubljana, Zaloška Cesta 2, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia;
| | - Primož Drev
- Department of Pathology, Institute of Oncology Ljubljana, Zaloška Cesta 2, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia;
| | - Nina Ružić Gorenjec
- Institute for Biostatistics and Medical Informatics, Faculty of Medicine, University of Ljubljana, Vrazov Trg 2, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia;
| | - Cvetka Grašič Kuhar
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Ljubljana, Vrazov Trg 2, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia (B.G.); (A.K.I.); (C.G.K.)
- Division of Medical Oncology, Institute of Oncology Ljubljana, Zaloška Cesta 2, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Zhou S, Zheng J, Zhai W, Chen Y. Spatio-temporal heterogeneity in cancer evolution and tumor microenvironment of renal cell carcinoma with tumor thrombus. Cancer Lett 2023; 572:216350. [PMID: 37574183 DOI: 10.1016/j.canlet.2023.216350] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/12/2023] [Revised: 08/01/2023] [Accepted: 08/10/2023] [Indexed: 08/15/2023]
Abstract
Metastasis is the most fatal aspect of cancer, often preceded by a tumor thrombus (TT) which forms within the vascular system. Renal cell carcinoma (RCC), the predominant form of kidney cancer, witnesses a venous system invasion in 4-10% of cases, resulting in venous tumor thrombus (RCC-TT). This variant represents a formidable clinical challenge due to its escalated surgical complexity, heightened risk of progression and metastasis, and an adverse prognosis. However, recent trials addressing RCC-TT face significant barriers stemming from the profound inter- and intra-tumoral heterogeneity, patient-specific treatment variations, and distinct therapeutic resistance patterns between the primary tumor (PT) and the TT. This review delves into the unique evolutionary pathway of RCC-TT, the relationship between the staging and grading of RCC-TT invasion patterns, and the spatial molecular profiling of RCC-TT. Additionally, we assess the temporal heterogeneity among TT, PT, and distant metastases, as well as the functional phenotypes of TME components. An outlook for future research on RCC-TT is also provided.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sian Zhou
- Department of Urology, Renji Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, 200127, China.
| | - Junhua Zheng
- Department of Urology, Renji Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, 200127, China.
| | - Wei Zhai
- Department of Urology, Renji Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, 200127, China; Department of Urology, State Key Laboratory of Oncogenes and Related Genes, Renji Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, 200127, China.
| | - Yonghui Chen
- Department of Urology, Renji Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, 200127, China.
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Xi Y, Zhang Y, Zheng K, Zou J, Gui L, Zou X, Chen L, Hao J, Zhang Y. A chemotherapy response prediction model derived from tumor-promoting B and Tregs and proinflammatory macrophages in HGSOC. Front Oncol 2023; 13:1171582. [PMID: 37519793 PMCID: PMC10382026 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2023.1171582] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/23/2023] [Accepted: 06/27/2023] [Indexed: 08/01/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Most patients with high-grade serous ovarian cancer (HGSOC) experienced disease recurrence with cumulative chemoresistance, leading to treatment failure. However, few biomarkers are currently available in clinical practice that can accurately predict chemotherapy response. The tumor immune microenvironment is critical for cancer development, and its transcriptomic profile may be associated with treatment response and differential outcomes. The aim of this study was to develop a new predictive signature for chemotherapy in patients with HGSOC. Methods Two HGSOC single-cell RNA sequencing datasets from patients receiving chemotherapy were reinvestigated. The subtypes of endoplasmic reticulum stress-related XBP1+ B cells, invasive metastasis-related ACTB+ Tregs, and proinflammatory-related macrophage subtypes with good predictive power and associated with chemotherapy response were identified. These results were verified in an independent HGSOC bulk RNA-seq dataset for chemotherapy. Further validation in clinical cohorts used quantitative real-time PCR (qRT-PCR). Results By combining cluster-specific genes for the aforementioned cell subtypes, we constructed a chemotherapy response prediction model containing 43 signature genes that achieved an area under the receiver operator curve (AUC) of 0.97 (p = 2.1e-07) for the GSE156699 cohort (88 samples). A huge improvement was achieved compared to existing prediction models with a maximum AUC of 0.74. In addition, its predictive capability was validated in multiple independent bulk RNA-seq datasets. The qRT-PCR results demonstrate that the expression of the six genes has the highest diagnostic value, consistent with the trend observed in the analysis of public data. Conclusions The developed chemotherapy response prediction model can be used as a valuable clinical decision tool to guide chemotherapy in HGSOC patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yue Xi
- Department of Reproductive Medicine, Central Hospital Affiliated to Shandong First Medical University, Jinan, Shandong, China
| | - Yingchun Zhang
- Department of Reproductive Medicine, Central Hospital Affiliated to Shandong First Medical University, Jinan, Shandong, China
| | - Kun Zheng
- Department of Urology, Shanghai Sixth People’s Hospital Affiliated to Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China
| | - Jiawei Zou
- Institute of Clinical Science, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Lv Gui
- Department of Pathology, Jinshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Xin Zou
- Jinshan Hospital Center for Tumor Diagnosis & Therapy, Jinshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Liang Chen
- Department of Gynecological Oncology, Shandong Cancer Hospital Affiliated to Shandong University, Shandong Academy of Medical Sciences, Jinan, China
| | - Jie Hao
- Institute of Clinical Science, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Yiming Zhang
- Department of Reproductive Medicine, Central Hospital Affiliated to Shandong First Medical University, Jinan, Shandong, China
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Venetis K, Sajjadi E, Ivanova M, Peccatori FA, Fusco N, Guerini-Rocco E. Characterization of the immune environment in pregnancy-associated breast cancer. Future Oncol 2023. [PMID: 37376974 DOI: 10.2217/fon-2022-1321] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/29/2023] Open
Abstract
Pregnancy-associated breast cancer (PrBC) is a rare and clinically challenging condition. Specific immune mechanisms and pathways are involved in maternal-fetal tolerance and tumor-host immunoediting. The comprehension of the molecular processes underpinning this immune synergy in PrBC is needed to improve patients' clinical management. Only a few studies focused on the immune biology of PrBC and attempted to identify bona fide biomarkers. Therefore, clinically actionable information remains extremely puzzling for these patients. In this review article, we discuss the current knowledge on the immune environment of PrBC, in comparison with pregnancy-unrelated breast cancer and in the context of maternal immune changes during pregnancy. A particular emphasis is given to the actual role of potential immune-related biomarkers for PrBC clinical management.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Konstantinos Venetis
- Division of Pathology, IEO, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, 20141, Italy
| | - Elham Sajjadi
- Division of Pathology, IEO, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, 20141, Italy
- Department of Oncology & Hemato-Oncology, University of Milan, Milan, 20122, Italy
| | - Mariia Ivanova
- Division of Pathology, IEO, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, 20141, Italy
| | - Fedro Alessandro Peccatori
- Fertility & Procreation Unit, Division of Gynecologic Oncology, IEO, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, 20141, Italy
| | - Nicola Fusco
- Division of Pathology, IEO, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, 20141, Italy
- Department of Oncology & Hemato-Oncology, University of Milan, Milan, 20122, Italy
| | - Elena Guerini-Rocco
- Division of Pathology, IEO, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, 20141, Italy
- Department of Oncology & Hemato-Oncology, University of Milan, Milan, 20122, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Feng J, Wang L, Zhang K, Ni S, Li B, Liu J, Wang D. Identification and panoramic analysis of drug response-related genes in triple negative breast cancer using as an example NVP-BEZ235. Sci Rep 2023; 13:5984. [PMID: 37045929 PMCID: PMC10097725 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-023-32757-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/22/2022] [Accepted: 04/01/2023] [Indexed: 04/14/2023] Open
Abstract
Taking NVP-BEZ235 (BEZ235) as an example to screen drug response-related genes (DRRGs) and explore their potential value in triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC). Through high-throughput technique, multidimensional transcriptome expression data (mRNA, miRNA and lncRNA) of BEZ235-treated and -untreated MDA-MB-468 cell lines were obtained. Combined with transcriptome data of the MDA-MB-468 cells and TCGA-TNBC tissues, differential gene expression analysis and WGCNA were performed to identify DRRGs associated with tumor trait by simulating the drug response microenvironment (DRM) of BEZ235-treated patients. Based on DRRGs, we constructed a ceRNA network and verified the expression levels of three key molecules by RT-qPCR, which not only demonstrated the successful construction of a BEZ235-treated cell line model but also explained the antitumor mechanism of BEZ235. Four molecular subtypes related to the DRM with survival difference were proposed using cluster analysis, namely glycolysis subtype, proliferation depression subtype, immune-suppressed subtype, and immune-activated subtype. A novel prognostic signature consisting of four DRRGs was established by Lasso-Cox analysis, which exhibited outstanding performance in predicting overall survival compared with several excellent reported signatures. The high- and low-risk groups were characterized by enrichment of metabolism-related pathways and immune-related pathways, respectively. Of note, the low-risk group had a better response to immune checkpoint blockade. Besides, pRRophetic analysis found that patients in the low-risk group were more sensitive to methotrexate and cisplation, whereas more resistant to BEZ235, docetaxel and paclitaxel. In conclusion, the DRRGs exemplified by BEZ235 are potential biomarkers for TNBC molecular typing, prognosis prediction and targeted therapy. The novel DRRGs-guided strategy for predicting the subtype, survival and therapy efficacy, might be also applied to more cancers and drugs other than TNBC and BEZ235.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jia Feng
- Department of Clinical Laboratory, The Affiliated Hospital of Southwest Medical University, Luzhou, Sichuan, China
- Department of Clinical Laboratory, Sichuan Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Sichuan Cancer Hospital & Institute, Sichuan Cancer Center, Affiliated Cancer Hospital of University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu, Sichuan, China
| | - Luchang Wang
- Department of Clinical Laboratory, The Affiliated Hospital of Southwest Medical University, Luzhou, Sichuan, China
| | - Kaijiong Zhang
- Department of Clinical Laboratory, Sichuan Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Sichuan Cancer Hospital & Institute, Sichuan Cancer Center, Affiliated Cancer Hospital of University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu, Sichuan, China
| | - Sujiao Ni
- Department of Clinical Laboratory, Sichuan Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Sichuan Cancer Hospital & Institute, Sichuan Cancer Center, Affiliated Cancer Hospital of University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu, Sichuan, China
| | - Baolin Li
- Department of Clinical Laboratory, The Affiliated Hospital of Southwest Medical University, Luzhou, Sichuan, China
| | - Jinbo Liu
- Department of Clinical Laboratory, The Affiliated Hospital of Southwest Medical University, Luzhou, Sichuan, China.
| | - Dongsheng Wang
- Department of Clinical Laboratory, Sichuan Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Sichuan Cancer Hospital & Institute, Sichuan Cancer Center, Affiliated Cancer Hospital of University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu, Sichuan, China.
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Prognostic Implications of the Residual Tumor Microenvironment after Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Triple-Negative Breast Cancer Patients without Pathological Complete Response. Cancers (Basel) 2023; 15:cancers15030597. [PMID: 36765559 PMCID: PMC9913578 DOI: 10.3390/cancers15030597] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/05/2022] [Revised: 01/12/2023] [Accepted: 01/16/2023] [Indexed: 01/20/2023] Open
Abstract
With a high risk of relapse and death, and a poor or absent response to therapeutics, the triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) subtype is particularly challenging, especially in patients who cannot achieve a pathological complete response (pCR) after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC). Although the tumor microenvironment (TME) is known to influence disease progression and the effectiveness of therapeutics, its predictive and prognostic potential remains uncertain. This work aimed to define the residual TME profile after NAC of a retrospective cohort with 96 TNBC patients by immunohistochemical staining (cell markers) and chromogenic in situ hybridization (genetic markers). Kaplan-Meier curves were used to estimate the influence of the selected TME markers on five-year overall survival (OS) and relapse-free survival (RFS) probabilities. The risks of each variable being associated with relapse and death were determined through univariate and multivariate Cox analyses. We describe a unique tumor-infiltrating immune profile with high levels of lymphocytes (CD4, FOXP3) and dendritic cells (CD21, CD1a and CD83) that are valuable prognostic factors in post-NAC TNBC patients. Our study also demonstrates the value of considering not only cellular but also genetic TME markers such as MUC-1 and CXCL13 in routine clinical diagnosis to refine prognosis modelling.
Collapse
|
15
|
Zhu Y, Tzoras E, Matikas A, Bergh J, Valachis A, Zerdes I, Foukakis T. Expression patterns and prognostic implications of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes dynamics in early breast cancer patients receiving neoadjuvant therapy: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Front Oncol 2022; 12:999843. [PMID: 36531050 PMCID: PMC9749788 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2022.999843] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/21/2022] [Accepted: 11/14/2022] [Indexed: 08/06/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE High levels of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) are associated with better outcomes in early breast cancer and higher pathological response rates to neoadjuvant chemotherapy especially in the triple-negative (TNBC) and HER2+ subtypes. However, the dynamic changes in TILs levels after neoadjuvant treatment (NAT) are less studied. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to investigate the patterns and role of TILs dynamics change in early breast cancer patients receiving NAT. METHODS Medline, Embase, Web of Science Core Collection and PubMed Central databases were searched for eligible studies. Data were extracted independently by two researchers and discordances were resolved by a third. Pooled TILs rates pre- & post-treatment (overall and per subtype), pooled rates of ΔTILs and direction of change after NAT as well as correlation of ΔTILs with survival outcomes were generated in the outcome analysis. RESULTS Of 2116 identified entries, 34 studies fulfilled the criteria and provided adequate data for the outcomes of interest. A decreased level of TILs was observed after NAT in paired samples across all subtypes. The effect of NAT on TILs was most prominent in TNBC subtype with a substantial change, either increase or decrease, in 79.3% (95% CI 61.7-92.6%) of the patients as well as in HER2+ disease (14.4% increased vs 46.2% decreased). An increase in ΔTILs in TNBC was associated with better disease-free/relapse-free survival in pooled analysis (univariate HR = 0.59, 95% CI: 0.37-0.95, p = 0.03). CONCLUSION This meta-analysis illustrates the TILs dynamics during NAT for breast cancer and indicates prognostic implications of ΔTILs in TNBC. The potential clinical utility of the longitudinal assessment of TILs during neoadjuvant therapy warrants further validation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yajing Zhu
- Department of Oncology-Pathology, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Evangelos Tzoras
- Department of Oncology-Pathology, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Alexios Matikas
- Department of Oncology-Pathology, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
- Breast Center, Theme Cancer, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Jonas Bergh
- Department of Oncology-Pathology, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
- Breast Center, Theme Cancer, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Antonios Valachis
- Department of Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and Health, Örebro University, Örebro, Sweden
| | - Ioannis Zerdes
- Department of Oncology-Pathology, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
- Breast Center, Theme Cancer, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Theodoros Foukakis
- Department of Oncology-Pathology, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
- Breast Center, Theme Cancer, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Immune-Related Gene Signatures to Predict the Effectiveness of Chemoimmunotherapy in Triple-Negative Breast Cancer Using Exploratory Subgroup Discovery. Cancers (Basel) 2022; 14:cancers14235806. [PMID: 36497286 PMCID: PMC9735620 DOI: 10.3390/cancers14235806] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/06/2022] [Revised: 11/23/2022] [Accepted: 11/23/2022] [Indexed: 11/26/2022] Open
Abstract
Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) is an aggressive subtype of breast cancer with limited therapeutic options. Although immunotherapy has shown potential in TNBC patients, clinical studies have only demonstrated a modest response. Therefore, the exploration of immunotherapy in combination with chemotherapy is warranted. In this project we identified immune-related gene signatures for TNBC patients that may explain differences in patients' outcomes after anti-PD-L1+chemotherapy treatment. First, we ran the exploratory subgroup discovery algorithm on the TNBC dataset comprised of 422 patients across 24 studies. Secondly, we narrowed down the search to twelve homogenous subgroups based on tumor mutational burden (TMB, low or high), relapse status (disease-free or recurred), tumor cellularity (high, low and moderate), menopausal status (pre- or post) and tumor stage (I, II and III). For each subgroup we identified a union of the top 10% of genotypic patterns. Furthermore, we employed a multinomial regression model to predict significant genotypic patterns that would be linked to partial remission after anti-PD-L1+chemotherapy treatment. Finally, we uncovered distinct immune cell populations (T-cells, B-cells, Myeloid, NK-cells) for TNBC patients with various treatment outcomes. CD4-Tn-LEF1 and CD4-CXCL13 T-cells were linked to partial remission on anti-PD-L1+chemotherapy treatment. Our informatics pipeline may help to select better responders to chemoimmunotherapy, as well as pinpoint the underlying mechanisms of drug resistance in TNBC patients at single-cell resolution.
Collapse
|
17
|
Gazinska P, Milton C, Iacovacci J, Ward J, Buus R, Alaguthurai T, Graham R, Akarca A, Lips E, Naidoo K, Wesseling J, Marafioti T, Cheang M, Gillett C, Wu Y, Khan A, Melcher A, Salgado R, Dowsett M, Tutt A, Roxanis I, Haider S, Irshad S. Dynamic Changes in the NK-, Neutrophil-, and B-cell Immunophenotypes Relevant in High Metastatic Risk Post Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy-Resistant Early Breast Cancers. Clin Cancer Res 2022; 28:4494-4508. [PMID: 36161312 PMCID: PMC9561554 DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-22-0543] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/19/2022] [Revised: 05/12/2022] [Accepted: 08/12/2022] [Indexed: 01/07/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE To identify potential immune targets in post-neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC)-resistant triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) and ER+HER2- breast cancer disease. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN Following pathology review, 153 patients were identified as having residual cancer burden (RCB) II/III disease (TNBC n = 80; ER+HER2-n = 73). Baseline pre-NAC samples were available for evaluation for 32 of 80 TNBC and 36 of 73 ER+HER2- cases. Bright-field hematoxylin and eosin assessment allowed for tumor-infiltrating lymphocyte (TIL) evaluation in all cases. Multiplexed immunofluorescence was used to identify the abundance and distribution of immune cell subsets. Levels of checkpoints including PD-1/PD-L1 expression were also quantified. Findings were then validated using expression profiling of cancer and immune-related genes. Cytometry by time-of-flight characterized the dynamic changes in circulating immune cells with NAC. RESULTS RCB II/III TNBC and ER+HER2- breast cancer were immunologically "cold" at baseline and end of NAC. Although the distribution of immune cell subsets across subtypes was similar, the mRNA expression profiles were both subtype- and chemotherapy-specific. TNBC RCB II/III disease was enriched with genes related to neutrophil degranulation, and displayed strong interplay across immune and cancer pathways. We observed similarities in the dynamic changes in B-cell biology following NAC irrespective of subtype. However, NAC induced changes in the local and circulating tumor immune microenvironment (TIME) that varied by subtype and response. Specifically, in TNBC residual disease, we observed downregulation of stimulatory (CD40/OX40L) and inhibitory (PD-L1/PD-1) receptor expression and an increase in NK cell populations (especially non-cytolytic, exhausted CD56dimCD16-) within both the local TIME and peripheral white cell populations. CONCLUSIONS This study identifies several potential immunologic pathways in residual disease, which may be targeted to benefit high-risk patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Patrycja Gazinska
- Breast Cancer Now Toby Robins Research Centre, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK
| | - Charlotte Milton
- School of Cancer and Pharmaceutical Sciences, King's College London, UK
| | - Jacopo Iacovacci
- Breast Cancer Now Toby Robins Research Centre, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK
| | - Joseph Ward
- Targeted Therapy Team, The Institute of Cancer Research, Chester Beatty Laboratories, London, UK
| | - Richard Buus
- Breast Cancer Now Toby Robins Research Centre, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK
| | - Thanussuyah Alaguthurai
- Breast Cancer Now Toby Robins Research Centre, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK
- Breast Cancer Now Research Unit, King's College London, London, UK
| | - Rosalind Graham
- School of Cancer and Pharmaceutical Sciences, King's College London, UK
| | - Ayse Akarca
- Department of Cellular Pathology, University College London, London, UK
| | - Esther Lips
- Division of Molecular Pathology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Kalnisha Naidoo
- Breast Cancer Now Toby Robins Research Centre, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK
| | - Jelle Wesseling
- Division of Molecular Pathology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
- Department of Pathology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | | | - Maggie Cheang
- Clinical Trials and Statistics Unit, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK
| | - Cheryl Gillett
- Breast Cancer Now Toby Robins Research Centre, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK
| | - Yin Wu
- School of Cancer and Pharmaceutical Sciences, King's College London, UK
| | - Aadil Khan
- Targeted Therapy Team, The Institute of Cancer Research, Chester Beatty Laboratories, London, UK
| | - Alan Melcher
- Division of Radiotherapy and Imaging, Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK
| | - Roberto Salgado
- Division of Research, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Australia; Department of Pathology, GZA-ZNA Hospitals, Antwerp, Belgium
| | - Mitch Dowsett
- Breast Cancer Now Toby Robins Research Centre, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK
- Ralph Lauren Centre for Breast Cancer Research, Royal Marsden Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Andrew Tutt
- Breast Cancer Now Toby Robins Research Centre, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK
- Breast Cancer Now Research Unit, King's College London, London, UK
- Oncology and Haematology Directorate, Guy's and St Thomas’ NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Ioannis Roxanis
- Breast Cancer Now Toby Robins Research Centre, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK
| | - Syed Haider
- Breast Cancer Now Toby Robins Research Centre, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK
| | - Sheeba Irshad
- School of Cancer and Pharmaceutical Sciences, King's College London, UK
- Breast Cancer Now Research Unit, King's College London, London, UK
- Oncology and Haematology Directorate, Guy's and St Thomas’ NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
- Cancer Research UK (CRUK) Clinician Scientist, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Wang B, Wang M, Ao D, Wei X. CXCL13-CXCR5 axis: Regulation in inflammatory diseases and cancer. Biochim Biophys Acta Rev Cancer 2022; 1877:188799. [PMID: 36103908 DOI: 10.1016/j.bbcan.2022.188799] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 12.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/16/2022] [Revised: 09/06/2022] [Accepted: 09/06/2022] [Indexed: 01/10/2023]
Abstract
Chemokine C-X-C motif ligand 13 (CXCL13), originally identified as a B-cell chemokine, plays an important role in the immune system. The interaction between CXCL13 and its receptor, the G-protein coupled receptor (GPCR) CXCR5, builds a signaling network that regulates not only normal organisms but also the development of many diseases. However, the precise action mechanism remains unclear. In this review, we discussed the functional mechanisms of the CXCL13-CXCR5 axis under normal conditions, with special focus on its association with diseases. For certain refractory diseases, we emphasize the diagnostic and therapeutic role of CXCL13-CXCR5 axis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Binhan Wang
- Laboratory of Aging Research and Cancer Drug Target, State Key Laboratory of Biotherapy, National Clinical Research Center for Geriatrics, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
| | - Manni Wang
- Laboratory of Aging Research and Cancer Drug Target, State Key Laboratory of Biotherapy, National Clinical Research Center for Geriatrics, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
| | - Danyi Ao
- Laboratory of Aging Research and Cancer Drug Target, State Key Laboratory of Biotherapy, National Clinical Research Center for Geriatrics, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
| | - Xiawei Wei
- Laboratory of Aging Research and Cancer Drug Target, State Key Laboratory of Biotherapy, National Clinical Research Center for Geriatrics, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Araujo JM, De la Cruz-Ku G, Cornejo M, Doimi F, Dyer R, Gomez HL, Pinto JA. Prognostic Capability of TNBC 3-Gene Score among Triple-Negative Breast Cancer Subtypes. Cancers (Basel) 2022; 14:cancers14174286. [PMID: 36077821 PMCID: PMC9454544 DOI: 10.3390/cancers14174286] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/15/2022] [Revised: 08/29/2022] [Accepted: 08/30/2022] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Background: Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) is a complex and molecularly heterogeneous entity, with the poorest outcome compared with other breast cancer subtypes. Previously, we developed a TNBC 3-gene score with a significant prognostic capability. This study aims to test the 3-gene score in the different TNBC subtypes. Methods: Data from 204 TNBC patients treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy were retrieved from public datasets and pooled (GSE25066, GSE58812, and GSE16446). After removing batch effects, cases were classified into Lehman’s TNBC subtypes and then the TNBC 3-gene score was used to evaluate the risk of distant recurrence in each subgroup. In addition, the association with tumor-infiltrating lymphocyte (TILs) levels was evaluated in a retrospective group of 72 TNBC cases. Results: The TNBC 3-gene score was able to discriminate patients with different risks within the pooled cohort (HR = 2.41 for high vs. low risk; 95%CI: 1.50−3.86). The score showed predictive capability in the immunomodulatory subtype (HR = 4.16; 95%CI: 1.63−10.60) and in the mesenchymal stem-like subtype (HR = 18.76; 95%CI: 1.68−208.97). In the basal-like 1, basal-like-2, and mesenchymal subtypes, the observed differential risk patterns showed no statistical significance. The score had poor predictive capability in the luminal androgen receptor subtype (p = 0.765). In addition, a low TNBC 3-gene score was related to a high level of TIL infiltration (p < 0.001). Conclusions: The TNBC 3-gene score is able to predict the risk of distant recurrence in TNBC patients, specifically in the immunomodulatory and mesenchymal stem-like subtype. Despite a small sample size in each subgroup, an improved prognostic capability was seen in TNBC subtypes with tumor-infiltrating components.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jhajaira M. Araujo
- Centro de Investigación Básica y Traslacional, AUNA Ideas, Lima 15036, Peru
- Escuela Profesional de Medicina Humana, Universidad Privada San Juan Bautista, Lima 15067, Peru
| | - Gabriel De la Cruz-Ku
- Department of Surgery, University of Massachusetts, Worcester, MA 01604, USA
- Universidad Cientifica del Sur, Lima 15067, Peru
| | - Melanie Cornejo
- Centro de Investigación Básica y Traslacional, AUNA Ideas, Lima 15036, Peru
| | - Franco Doimi
- Departamento de Patología, Oncosalud-AUNA, Lima 15036, Peru
| | - Richard Dyer
- Departamento de Patología, Oncosalud-AUNA, Lima 15036, Peru
| | - Henry L. Gomez
- Departamento de Medicina Oncológica, Oncosalud-AUNA, Lima 15036, Peru
| | - Joseph A. Pinto
- Centro de Investigación Básica y Traslacional, AUNA Ideas, Lima 15036, Peru
- Correspondence: ; Tel.: +51-1-5137900 (ext. 2231)
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Ribeiro R, Carvalho MJ, Goncalves J, Moreira JN. Immunotherapy in triple-negative breast cancer: Insights into tumor immune landscape and therapeutic opportunities. Front Mol Biosci 2022; 9:903065. [PMID: 36060249 PMCID: PMC9437219 DOI: 10.3389/fmolb.2022.903065] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/23/2022] [Accepted: 07/13/2022] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Abstract
Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) is a clinically aggressive subtype of breast cancer that represents 15-20% of breast tumors and is more prevalent in young pre-menopausal women. It is the subtype of breast cancers with the highest metastatic potential and recurrence at the first 5 years after diagnosis. In addition, mortality increases when a complete pathological response is not achieved. As TNBC cells lack estrogen, progesterone, and HER2 receptors, patients do not respond well to hormone and anti-HER2 therapies, and conventional chemotherapy remains the standard treatment. Despite efforts to develop targeted therapies, this disease continues to have a high unmet medical need, and there is an urgent demand for customized diagnosis and therapeutics. As immunotherapy is changing the paradigm of anticancer treatment, it arises as an alternative treatment for TNBC patients. TNBC is classified as an immunogenic subtype of breast cancer due to its high levels of tumor mutational burden and presence of immune cell infiltrates. This review addresses the implications of these characteristics for the diagnosis, treatment, and prognosis of the disease. Herein, the role of immune gene signatures and tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes as biomarkers in TNBC is reviewed, identifying their application in patient diagnosis and stratification, as well as predictors of efficacy. The expression of PD-L1 expression is already considered to be predictive of response to checkpoint inhibitor therapy, but the challenges regarding its value as biomarker are described. Moreover, the rationales for different formats of immunotherapy against TNBC currently under clinical research are discussed, and major clinical trials are highlighted. Immune checkpoint inhibitors have demonstrated clinical benefit, particularly in early-stage tumors and when administered in combination with chemotherapy, with several regimens approved by the regulatory authorities. The success of antibody-drug conjugates and research on other emerging approaches, such as vaccines and cell therapies, will also be addressed. These advances give hope on the development of personalized, more effective, and safe treatments, which will improve the survival and quality of life of patients with TNBC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rita Ribeiro
- CNC—Center for Neurosciences and Cell Biology, Center for Innovative Biomedicine and Biotechnology (CIBB), University of Coimbra, Faculty of Medicine (Polo 1), Coimbra, Portugal
- iMed.ULisboa—Research Institute for Medicines, Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Lisbon, Lisbon, Portugal
- Univ Coimbra—University of Coimbra, CIBB, Faculty of Pharmacy, Coimbra, Portugal
| | - Maria João Carvalho
- Univ Coimbra—University of Coimbra, CIBB, Faculty of Pharmacy, Coimbra, Portugal
- CHUC—Coimbra Hospital and University Centre, Department of Gynaecology, Coimbra, Portugal
- Univ Coimbra—University Clinic of Gynaecology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Coimbra, Coimbra, Portugal
- iCBR—Institute for Clinical and Biomedical Research Area of Environment Genetics and Oncobiology (CIMAGO), Faculty of Medicine, University of Coimbra, Coimbra, Portugal
- CACC—Clinical Academic Center of Coimbra, Coimbra, Portugal
| | - João Goncalves
- iMed.ULisboa—Research Institute for Medicines, Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Lisbon, Lisbon, Portugal
| | - João Nuno Moreira
- CNC—Center for Neurosciences and Cell Biology, Center for Innovative Biomedicine and Biotechnology (CIBB), University of Coimbra, Faculty of Medicine (Polo 1), Coimbra, Portugal
- Univ Coimbra—University of Coimbra, CIBB, Faculty of Pharmacy, Coimbra, Portugal
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Pinilla K, Drewett LM, Lucey R, Abraham JE. Precision Breast Cancer Medicine: Early Stage Triple Negative Breast Cancer-A Review of Molecular Characterisation, Therapeutic Targets and Future Trends. Front Oncol 2022; 12:866889. [PMID: 36003779 PMCID: PMC9393396 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2022.866889] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/31/2022] [Accepted: 05/23/2022] [Indexed: 11/29/2022] Open
Abstract
Personalised approaches to the management of all solid tumours are increasing rapidly, along with wider accessibility for clinicians. Advances in tumour characterisation and targeted therapies have placed triple-negative breast cancers (TNBC) at the forefront of this approach. TNBC is a highly heterogeneous disease with various histopathological features and is driven by distinct molecular alterations. The ability to tailor individualised and effective treatments for each patient is of particular importance in this group due to the high risk of distant recurrence and death. The mainstay of treatment across all subtypes of TNBC has historically been cytotoxic chemotherapy, which is often associated with off-target tissue toxicity and drug resistance. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy is commonly used as it allows close monitoring of early treatment response and provides valuable prognostic information. Patients who achieve a complete pathological response after neoadjuvant chemotherapy are known to have significantly improved long-term outcomes. Conversely, poor responders face a higher risk of relapse and death. The identification of those subgroups that are more likely to benefit from breakthroughs in the personalised approach is a challenge of the current era where several targeted therapies are available. This review presents an overview of contemporary practice, and promising future trends in the management of early TNBC. Platinum chemotherapy, DNA damage response (DDR) inhibitors, immune checkpoint inhibitors, inhibitors of the PI3K-AKT-mTOR, and androgen receptor (AR) pathways are some of the increasingly studied therapies which will be reviewed. We will also discuss the growing evidence for less-developed agents and predictive biomarkers that are likely to contribute to the forthcoming advances in this field. Finally, we will propose a framework for the personalised management of TNBC based upon the integration of clinico-pathological and molecular features to ensure that long-term outcomes are optimised.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Karen Pinilla
- Precision Breast Cancer Institute, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom
- Department of Oncology, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, United Kingdom
- Cancer Research UK Cambridge Centre, Cancer Research UK Cambridge Institute, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom
| | - Lynsey M. Drewett
- Precision Breast Cancer Institute, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom
- Department of Oncology, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, United Kingdom
| | - Rebecca Lucey
- Precision Breast Cancer Institute, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom
- Department of Oncology, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, United Kingdom
| | - Jean E. Abraham
- Precision Breast Cancer Institute, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom
- Department of Oncology, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, United Kingdom
- Cancer Research UK Cambridge Centre, Cancer Research UK Cambridge Institute, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Liu D, Hao Q, Li J, Li Q, Wang K, Geng Q, Wu Y, Vadgama JV, Wu Y. ZBED2 expression enhances interferon signaling and predicts better survival of estrogen receptor-negative breast cancer patients. Cancer Commun (Lond) 2022; 42:663-667. [PMID: 35486908 PMCID: PMC9257990 DOI: 10.1002/cac2.12296] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/30/2021] [Revised: 02/16/2022] [Accepted: 04/24/2022] [Indexed: 12/30/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Dingxie Liu
- Bluewater Biotech LLCNew ProvidenceNJ07974USA
| | - Qiongyu Hao
- Division of Cancer Research and TrainingDepartment of Internal MedicineCharles Drew University of Medicine and ScienceDavid Geffen UCLA School of Medicine and UCLA Jonsson Comprehensive Cancer CenterLos AngelesCA90095USA
| | - Jieqing Li
- Division of Cancer Research and TrainingDepartment of Internal MedicineCharles Drew University of Medicine and ScienceDavid Geffen UCLA School of Medicine and UCLA Jonsson Comprehensive Cancer CenterLos AngelesCA90095USA
- Department of Breast CancerCancer CenterGuangdong Provincial People's Hospital & Guangdong Academy of Medical SciencesGuangzhouGuangdong510080P. R. China
| | - Qun Li
- Department of OncologyShanghai East HospitalSchool of MedicineTongji UniversityShanghai200123P. R. China
| | - Kun Wang
- Department of Breast CancerCancer CenterGuangdong Provincial People's Hospital & Guangdong Academy of Medical SciencesGuangzhouGuangdong510080P. R. China
| | - Qing Geng
- Department of Thoracic SurgeryRenmin Hospital of Wuhan UniversityWuhanHubei430060P. R. China
| | - Yutong Wu
- Bluewater Biotech LLCNew ProvidenceNJ07974USA
| | - Jaydutt V. Vadgama
- Division of Cancer Research and TrainingDepartment of Internal MedicineCharles Drew University of Medicine and ScienceDavid Geffen UCLA School of Medicine and UCLA Jonsson Comprehensive Cancer CenterLos AngelesCA90095USA
| | - Yong Wu
- Division of Cancer Research and TrainingDepartment of Internal MedicineCharles Drew University of Medicine and ScienceDavid Geffen UCLA School of Medicine and UCLA Jonsson Comprehensive Cancer CenterLos AngelesCA90095USA
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Uchimiak K, Badowska-Kozakiewicz AM, Sobiborowicz-Sadowska A, Deptała A. Current State of Knowledge on the Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors in Triple-Negative Breast Cancer Treatment: Approaches, Efficacy, and Challenges. Clin Med Insights Oncol 2022; 16:11795549221099869. [PMID: 35721387 PMCID: PMC9201309 DOI: 10.1177/11795549221099869] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/07/2021] [Accepted: 04/19/2022] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) is the most aggressive breast cancer subtype with limited treatment options. Recently, there has been a growing interest in immunotherapy with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) in TNBC, leading to extensive preclinical and clinical research. This review summarizes the current state of knowledge on ICIs efficacy and their predictive markers in TNBC and highlights the areas where the data are still limited. Currently, the only approved ICI-based regimen for TNBC is pembrolizumab with chemotherapy. Its advantage over chemotherapy alone was confirmed for non-metastatic TNBC regardless of programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression (KEYNOTE-522) and for metastatic, PD-L1-positive TNBC (KEYNOTE-355). Pembrolizumab's efficacy was also evaluated in monotherapy, or in combination with niraparib and radiation therapy, showing potential efficacy and acceptable safety profile in phase 2 clinical trials. Atezolizumab + nab-paclitaxel increased the overall survival (OS) over placebo + nab-paclitaxel in early TNBC, regardless of PD-L1 status (IMpassion031). In IMpassion130 (untreated, advanced TNBC), the OS improvement was not statistically significant in the intention-to-treat population but clinically meaningful in the PD-L1 positive cohort. The durvalumab-anthracycline combination showed an increased response durability over placebo anthracycline in early TNBC (GeparNuevo). Several phase 1 clinical trials also showed a potential efficacy of atezolizumab and avelumab monotherapy in metastatic TNBC. ICIs appear to be applicable in both neoadjuvant and adjuvant settings, and are both pretreated and previously untreated patients. Further research is necessary to determine the most beneficial drug combinations and optimize patient selection. It is essential to identify the predictive markers for ICIs and factors affecting their expression.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Katarzyna Uchimiak
- Students’ Scientific Organization of
Cancer Cell Biology, Department of Cancer Prevention, Medical University of Warsaw,
Warsaw, Poland
| | | | - Aleksandra Sobiborowicz-Sadowska
- Students’ Scientific Organization of
Cancer Cell Biology, Department of Cancer Prevention, Medical University of Warsaw,
Warsaw, Poland
| | - Andrzej Deptała
- Department of Cancer Prevention,
Medical University of Warsaw, Warsaw, Poland
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Liu D, Hofman P. Expression of NOTCH1, NOTCH4, HLA-DMA and HLA-DRA is synergistically associated with T cell exclusion, immune checkpoint blockade efficacy and recurrence risk in ER-negative breast cancer. Cell Oncol (Dordr) 2022; 45:463-477. [PMID: 35543859 DOI: 10.1007/s13402-022-00677-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 04/20/2022] [Indexed: 11/26/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Reliable biomarkers to predict the outcome and treatment response of estrogen receptor (ER)-negative breast cancer (BC) are urgently needed. Since immune-related signaling plays an important role in the tumorigenesis of ER-negative BC, we asked whether Notch genes, alone or in combination with other immune genes, can be used to predict the clinical outcome and immune checkpoint blockade (ICB) for this type of cancer. METHODS We analyzed transcriptome data of 6918 BC samples from five independent cohorts, 81 xenograft triple-negative BC tumors that respond differently to ICB treatment and 754 samples of different cancer types from patients treated with ICB agents. RESULTS We found that among four Notch genes, the expression levels of NOTCH1 and NOTCH4 were positively associated with recurrence of ER-negative BC, and that combined expression of these two genes (named Notch14) further enhanced this association, which was comparable with that of the Notch pathway signature. Analysis of 1182 immune-related genes revealed that the expression levels of most HLA genes, particularly HLA-DMA and -DRA, were reversely associated with recurrence in ER-negative BC with low, but not high Notch14 expression. A combined expression signature of NOTCH1, NOTCH4, HLA-DMA and HLA-DRA was more prognostic for ER-negative and triple-negative BCs than previously reported immune-related signatures. Furthermore, we found that the expression levels of these four genes were also synergistically associated with T cell exclusion score, infiltration of specific T cells and ICB efficacy in ER-negative BC, thereby providing a potential molecular mechanism for the synergistic effect of these genes on BC. CONCLUSIONS Our data indicate that a gene signature composed of NOTCH1, NOTCH4, HLA-DMA and HLA-DRA may serve as a potential promising biomarker for predicting ICB therapy efficacy and recurrence in ER-negative/triple-negative BCs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dingxie Liu
- Bluewater Biotech LLC, PO Box 1010, New Providence, NJ, 07974, USA.
| | - Paul Hofman
- Laboratory of Clinical and Experimental Pathology, CHU Nice, FHU OncoAge, University Côte d'Azur, 06100, Nice, France.
- Team 4, IRCAN, UMR 7284 U10181, FHU OncoAge, Centre Antoine Lacassagne University Côte d'Azur, 06107, Nice, France.
- Hospital-Integrated Biobank (BB-0033-00025), CHU Nice, FHU OncoAge, University Côte d'Azur, 06100, Nice, France.
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Liang H, Huang J, Ao X, Guo W, Chen Y, Lu D, Lv Z, Tan X, He W, Jiang M, Xia H, Zhan Y, Guo W, Ye Z, Jiao L, Ma J, Wang C, Li H, Zhang X, Huang J. TMB and TCR Are Correlated Indicators Predictive of the Efficacy of Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Breast Cancer. Front Oncol 2021; 11:740427. [PMID: 34950580 PMCID: PMC8688823 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2021.740427] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/13/2021] [Accepted: 11/11/2021] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Abstract
Immune characteristics were reported correlated to benefit neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) in breast cancer, yet integration of comprehensive genomic alterations and T-cell receptors (TCR) to predict efficacy of NAC needs further investigation. This study simultaneously analyzed TMB (Tumor Mutation Burden), TCRs, and TILs (tumor infiltrating lymphocyte) in breast cancers receiving NAC was conducted in a prospective cohort (n = 22). The next-generation sequencing technology-based analysis of genomic alterations and TCR repertoire in paired breast cancer samples before and after NAC was conducted in a prospective cohort (n = 22). Fluorescent multiplex immunohistochemistry was used to stain CD4, CD8, PD1, TIM3, and cytokeratins simultaneously in those paired samples. TMB in pretreatment tumor tissues and TCR diversity index are higher in non-pCR patients than in pCR patients (10.6 vs. 2.3; p = 0.043) (2.066 vs. 0.467; p = 0.010). TMB and TCR diversity index had linear correlation (y = 5.587x − 0.881; r = 0.522, p = 0.012). Moreover, infiltrating T cells are significantly at higher presence in pCR versus non-pCR patients. Dynamically, the TMB reduced significantly after therapy in non-pCR patients (p = 0.010) but without TCR index change. The CDR3 peptide AWRSAGNYNEQF is the most highly expressed in pre-NAC samples of pCR patients and in post-NAC samples of non-pCR patients. In addition to pCR, high clonality of TCR and high level of CD8+ expression are associated with disease-free survival (DFS). TCR index and TMB have significant interaction and may guide neo-adjuvant treatment in operable breast cancers. Response to NAC in tumors with high TCR clonality may be attributable to high infiltration and expansion of tumor-specific CD8 positive effector cells.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hongling Liang
- Department of Breast Oncology, Affiliated Cancer Hospital & Institute of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Jia Huang
- School of Health Management, Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Xiang Ao
- Department of Breast Oncology, Affiliated Cancer Hospital & Institute of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Weibang Guo
- Guangdong Lung Cancer Institute, Cancer Center, Guangdong Provincial People’s Hospital, Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences, School of Medicine, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou, China
| | - Yu Chen
- Guangdong Lung Cancer Institute, Cancer Center, Guangdong Provincial People’s Hospital, Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences, School of Medicine, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou, China
| | - Danxia Lu
- Guangdong Lung Cancer Institute, Cancer Center, Guangdong Provincial People’s Hospital, Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences, School of Medicine, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou, China
| | - Zhiyi Lv
- Guangdong Lung Cancer Institute, Cancer Center, Guangdong Provincial People’s Hospital, Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences, School of Medicine, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou, China
| | - Xiaojun Tan
- Department of Pathology, Affiliated Cancer Hospital & Institute of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Weixing He
- Department of Breast Oncology, Affiliated Cancer Hospital & Institute of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Ming Jiang
- Department of Breast Oncology, Affiliated Cancer Hospital & Institute of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Haoming Xia
- Department of Breast Oncology, Affiliated Cancer Hospital & Institute of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Yongtao Zhan
- Department of Breast Oncology, Affiliated Cancer Hospital & Institute of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Weiling Guo
- Department of Breast Oncology, Affiliated Cancer Hospital & Institute of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Zhiqing Ye
- School of Health Management, Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Lei Jiao
- Panovue Biological Technology Co., Ltd, Beijing, China
| | - Jie Ma
- Panovue Biological Technology Co., Ltd, Beijing, China
| | | | - Hongsheng Li
- Department of Breast Oncology, Affiliated Cancer Hospital & Institute of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, China
- *Correspondence: Jianqing Huang, ; Xuchao Zhang, ; Hongsheng Li,
| | - Xuchao Zhang
- Guangdong Lung Cancer Institute, Cancer Center, Guangdong Provincial People’s Hospital, Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences, School of Medicine, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou, China
- *Correspondence: Jianqing Huang, ; Xuchao Zhang, ; Hongsheng Li,
| | - Jianqing Huang
- Department of Breast Oncology, Affiliated Cancer Hospital & Institute of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, China
- *Correspondence: Jianqing Huang, ; Xuchao Zhang, ; Hongsheng Li,
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Ma Q, Chen Y, Qin Q, Guo F, Wang YS, Li D. CXCL13 expression in mouse 4T1 breast cancer microenvironment elicits antitumor immune response by regulating immune cell infiltration. PRECISION CLINICAL MEDICINE 2021; 4:155-167. [PMID: 35693216 PMCID: PMC8982548 DOI: 10.1093/pcmedi/pbab020] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/30/2021] [Revised: 07/14/2021] [Accepted: 07/29/2021] [Indexed: 02/05/2023] Open
Abstract
Breast cancer is the most commonly diagnosed cancer type and the leading cause of cancer-related deaths among women worldwide. Previous studies have reported contradictory performance of chemokine CXC motif ligand 13 (CXCL13) in breast cancer. In this study, The Cancer Genome Atlas database analysis revealed that CXCL13 was overexpressed in various human cancers including breast carcinoma, and associated with good clinical prognosis in breast cancer. Flow cytometry detection also found upregulated intracellular CXCL13 expression in human breast cancer cell lines. To explore the possible role of CXCL13 in the breast cancer microenvironment, mouse triple negative breast cancer (TNBC) was lentivirally transfected to stably overexpress mouse CXCL13 (4T1-CXCL13). Both parental 4T1 and 4T1-CXCL13 strains showed no in vitro or in vivo endogenous cell surface CXCR5 expression. In immune-competent BALB/c mice, the in vivo tumor growth of 4T1-CXCL13 was significantly inhibited and even completely eradicated, accompanied with increased infiltrations of CD4+, CD8+ T lymphocytes and CD11b+CD11c+ DCs. Further investigations showed that CXCL13 expression in the 4T1 tumor microenvironment elicited long-term antitumor immune memory, and rejection of distal parental tumor. The antitumor activity of CXCL13 was remarkedly impaired in BALB/cA-nu nude mice, or in BALB/c mice with CD8+ T lymphocyte or NK cell depletion. Our investigation indicated that CXCL13 expression in TNBC triggered effective antitumor immunity by chemoattracting immune cell infiltrations and could be considered as a novel prognostic marker for TNBC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Qizhi Ma
- Department of Thoracic Oncology, State Key Laboratory of Biotherapy and Cancer Center, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610041, China
| | - Yue Chen
- Department of Thoracic Oncology, State Key Laboratory of Biotherapy and Cancer Center, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610041, China
| | - Qing Qin
- Department of Thoracic Oncology, State Key Laboratory of Biotherapy and Cancer Center, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610041, China
| | - Fuchun Guo
- Institute of Drug Clinical Trial, State Key Laboratory of Biotherapy and Cancer Center, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610041, China
| | - Yong-sheng Wang
- Institute of Drug Clinical Trial, State Key Laboratory of Biotherapy and Cancer Center, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610041, China
| | - Dan Li
- Institute of Respiratory Health, Frontiers Science Center for Disease-related Molecular Network, and Precision Medicine Center, Precision Medicine Key Laboratory of Sichuan Province, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610041, China
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Hossain F, Majumder S, David J, Miele L. Precision Medicine and Triple-Negative Breast Cancer: Current Landscape and Future Directions. Cancers (Basel) 2021; 13:cancers13153739. [PMID: 34359640 PMCID: PMC8345034 DOI: 10.3390/cancers13153739] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/15/2021] [Revised: 07/10/2021] [Accepted: 07/13/2021] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Simple Summary The implementation of precision medicine will revolutionize cancer treatment paradigms. Notably, this goal is not far from reality: genetically similar cancers can be treated similarly. The heterogeneous nature of triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) made it a suitable candidate to practice precision medicine. Using TNBC molecular subtyping and genomic profiling, a precision medicine-based clinical trial is ongoing. This review summarizes the current landscape and future directions of precision medicine and TNBC. Abstract Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) is an aggressive and heterogeneous subtype of breast cancer associated with a high recurrence and metastasis rate that affects African-American women disproportionately. The recent approval of targeted therapies for small subgroups of TNBC patients by the US ‘Food and Drug Administration’ is a promising development. The advancement of next-generation sequencing, particularly somatic exome panels, has raised hopes for more individualized treatment plans. However, the use of precision medicine for TNBC is a work in progress. This review will discuss the potential benefits and challenges of precision medicine for TNBC. A recent clinical trial designed to target TNBC patients based on their subtype-specific classification shows promise. Yet, tumor heterogeneity and sub-clonal evolution in primary and metastatic TNBC remain a challenge for oncologists to design adaptive precision medicine-based treatment plans.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fokhrul Hossain
- Department of Genetics, Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center (LSUHSC), New Orleans, LA 70112, USA; (S.M.); (L.M.)
- Stanley S. Scott Cancer Center, Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center (LSUHSC), New Orleans, LA 70112, USA
- Correspondence:
| | - Samarpan Majumder
- Department of Genetics, Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center (LSUHSC), New Orleans, LA 70112, USA; (S.M.); (L.M.)
- Stanley S. Scott Cancer Center, Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center (LSUHSC), New Orleans, LA 70112, USA
| | - Justin David
- School of Medicine, Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center (LSUHSC), New Orleans, LA 70112, USA;
| | - Lucio Miele
- Department of Genetics, Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center (LSUHSC), New Orleans, LA 70112, USA; (S.M.); (L.M.)
- Stanley S. Scott Cancer Center, Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center (LSUHSC), New Orleans, LA 70112, USA
- School of Medicine, Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center (LSUHSC), New Orleans, LA 70112, USA;
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
CXCL13 Signaling in the Tumor Microenvironment. ADVANCES IN EXPERIMENTAL MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY 2021; 1302:71-90. [PMID: 34286442 DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-62658-7_6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/05/2023]
Abstract
Chemokines have emerged as important players in tumorigenic process. An extensive body of literature generated over the last two or three decades strongly implicate abnormally activated or functionally disrupted chemokine signaling in liaising most-if not all-hallmark processes of cancer. It is well-known that chemokine signaling networks within the tumor microenvironment are highly versatile and context-dependent: exert both pro-tumoral and antitumoral activities. The C-X-C motif chemokine ligand 13 (CXCL13), and its cognate receptor CXCR5, represents an emerging example of chemokine signaling axes, which express the ability to modulate tumor growth and progression in either way. Collateral evidence indicate that CXCL13-CXCR5 axis may directly modulate tumor growth by inducing proliferation of cancer cells, as well as promoting invasive phenotypes and preventing their apoptosis. In addition, CXCL13-CXCR5 axis may also indirectly modulate tumor growth by regulating noncancerous cells, particularly the immune cells, within the tumor microenvironment. Here, we review the role of CXCL13, together with CXCR5, in the human tumor microenvironment. We first elaborate their patterns of expression, regulation, and biological functions in normal physiology. We then consider how their aberrant activity, as a result of differential overexpression or co-expression, may directly or indirectly modulate the growth of tumors through effects on both cancerous and noncancerous cells.
Collapse
|
29
|
Sinn BV, Loibl S, Hanusch CA, Zahm DM, Sinn HP, Untch M, Weber K, Karn T, Becker C, Marmé F, Schmitt WD, Müller V, Schem C, Treue D, Stickeler E, Klauschen F, Burchardi N, Furlanetto J, van Mackelenbergh M, Fasching PA, Schneeweiss A, Denkert C. Immune-related Gene Expression Predicts Response to Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy but not Additional Benefit from PD-L1 Inhibition in Women with Early Triple-negative Breast Cancer. Clin Cancer Res 2021; 27:2584-2591. [PMID: 33593886 DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-20-3113] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/31/2020] [Revised: 12/05/2020] [Accepted: 02/11/2021] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE We evaluated mRNA signatures to predict response to neoadjuvant PD-L1 inhibition in combination with chemotherapy in early triple-negative breast cancer. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN Targeted mRNA sequencing of 2,559 transcripts was performed in formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded samples from 162 patients of the GeparNuevo trial. We focused on validation of four predefined gene signatures and differential gene expression analyses for new predictive markers. RESULTS Two signatures [GeparSixto signature (G6-Sig) and IFN signature (IFN-Sig)] were predictive for treatment response in a multivariate model including treatment arm [G6-Sig: OR, 1.558; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.130-2.182; P = 0.008 and IFN-Sig: OR, 1.695; 95% CI, 1.234-2.376; P = 0.002), while the CYT metric predicted pathologic complete response (pCR) in the durvalumab arm, and the proliferation-associated gene signature in the placebo arm. Expression of PD-L1 mRNA was associated with better response in both arms, indicating that increased levels of PD-L1 are a general predictor of neoadjuvant therapy response. In an exploratory analysis, we identified seven genes that were higher expressed in responders in the durvalumab arm, but not the placebo arm: HLA-A, HLA-B, TAP1, GBP1, CXCL10, STAT1, and CD38. These genes were associated with cellular antigen processing and presentation and IFN signaling. CONCLUSIONS Immune-associated signatures are associated with pCR after chemotherapy, but might be of limited use for the prediction of response to additional immune checkpoint blockade. Gene expressions related to antigen presentation and IFN signaling might be interesting candidates for further evaluation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bruno V Sinn
- Department of Pathology, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institut of Health, Berlin, Germany.,Berlin Institute of Health (BIH), Berlin, Germany
| | - Sibylle Loibl
- German Breast Group Forschungs GmbH, Neu-Isenburg, Germany
| | - Claus A Hanusch
- Department of Gynecology, Rotkreuzklinikum München, Munich, Germany
| | - Dirk-Michael Zahm
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, SRH Waldklinikum Gera GmbH, Gera, Germany
| | - Hans-Peter Sinn
- Department of Pathology, Universitätsklinikum Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Michael Untch
- Department of Gynecology, Helios Kliniken Berlin-Buch, Berlin, Germany
| | - Karsten Weber
- German Breast Group Forschungs GmbH, Neu-Isenburg, Germany
| | - Thomas Karn
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Goethe-University, Frankfurt, Germany
| | - Clemens Becker
- Department of Pathology, Rotkreuzklinikum München, Munich, Germany
| | - Frederik Marmé
- Department of Gynecology, Universitätsklinikum Mannheim, Mannheim, Germany
| | - Wolfgang D Schmitt
- Department of Pathology, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institut of Health, Berlin, Germany
| | - Volkmar Müller
- Department of Gynecology, Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | | | - Denise Treue
- Department of Pathology, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institut of Health, Berlin, Germany
| | - Elmar Stickeler
- Department of Gynecology, Uniklinik RWTH Aachen, Aachen, Germany
| | - Frederik Klauschen
- Department of Pathology, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institut of Health, Berlin, Germany
| | | | | | | | - Peter A Fasching
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital Erlangen, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Andreas Schneeweiss
- Nationales Centrum für Tumorerkrankungen, Universitätsklinikum und Deutsches Krebsforschungszentrum Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Carsten Denkert
- Department of Pathology, Philipps-University Marburg and University Hospital Marburg (UKGM), Marburg, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Zhang Y, Liu J, Raj-Kumar PK, Sturtz LA, Praveen-Kumar A, Yang HH, Lee MP, Fantacone-Campbell JL, Hooke JA, Kovatich AJ, Shriver CD, Hu H. Development and validation of prognostic gene signature for basal-like breast cancer and high-grade serous ovarian cancer. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2020; 184:689-698. [PMID: 32880016 PMCID: PMC8916168 DOI: 10.1007/s10549-020-05884-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/06/2019] [Accepted: 08/13/2020] [Indexed: 12/31/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Molecular similarities have been reported between basal-like breast cancer (BLBC) and high-grade serous ovarian cancer (HGSOC). To date, there have been no prognostic biomarkers that can provide risk stratification and inform treatment decisions for both BLBC and HGSOC. In this study, we developed a molecular signature for risk stratification in BLBC and further validated this signature in HGSOC. METHODS RNA-seq data was downloaded from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) project for 190 BLBC and 314 HGSOC patients. Analyses of differentially expressed genes between recurrent vs. non-recurrent cases were performed using different bioinformatics methods. Gene Signature was established using weighted linear combination of gene expression levels. Their prognostic performance was evaluated using survival analysis based on progression-free interval (PFI) and disease-free interval (DFI). RESULTS 63 genes were differentially expressed between 18 recurrent and 40 non-recurrent BLBC patients by two different methods. The recurrence index (RI) calculated from this 63-gene signature significantly stratified BLBC patients into two risk groups with 38 and 152 patients in the low-risk (RI-Low) and high-risk (RI-High) groups, respectively (p = 0.0004 and 0.0023 for PFI and DFI, respectively). Similar performance was obtained in the HGSOC cohort (p = 0.0131 and 0.004 for PFI and DFI, respectively). Multivariate Cox regression adjusting for age, grade, and stage showed that the 63-gene signature remained statistically significant in stratifying HGSOC patients (p = 0.0005). CONCLUSION A gene signature was identified to predict recurrence in BLBC and HGSOC patients. With further validation, this signature may provide an additional prognostic tool for clinicians to better manage BLBC, many of which are triple-negative and HGSOC patients who are currently difficult to treat.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yi Zhang
- Chan Soon-Shiong Institute of Molecular Medicine at Windber, Windber, PA, USA
| | - Jianfang Liu
- Chan Soon-Shiong Institute of Molecular Medicine at Windber, Windber, PA, USA
| | | | - Lori A Sturtz
- Chan Soon-Shiong Institute of Molecular Medicine at Windber, Windber, PA, USA
| | | | - Howard H Yang
- Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, Rockville, MD, USA
| | - Maxwell P Lee
- Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, Rockville, MD, USA
| | - J Leigh Fantacone-Campbell
- Murtha Cancer Center Research Program, Bethesda, MD, USA
- Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Bethesda, MD, USA
- Walter Reed National Military Medical Center, Bethesda, MD, USA
- Henry M. Jackson Foundation for the Advancement of Military Medicine, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Jeffrey A Hooke
- Murtha Cancer Center Research Program, Bethesda, MD, USA
- Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Bethesda, MD, USA
- Walter Reed National Military Medical Center, Bethesda, MD, USA
- Henry M. Jackson Foundation for the Advancement of Military Medicine, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Albert J Kovatich
- Murtha Cancer Center Research Program, Bethesda, MD, USA
- Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Bethesda, MD, USA
- Walter Reed National Military Medical Center, Bethesda, MD, USA
- Henry M. Jackson Foundation for the Advancement of Military Medicine, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Craig D Shriver
- Murtha Cancer Center Research Program, Bethesda, MD, USA
- Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Bethesda, MD, USA
- Walter Reed National Military Medical Center, Bethesda, MD, USA
- Henry M. Jackson Foundation for the Advancement of Military Medicine, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Hai Hu
- Chan Soon-Shiong Institute of Molecular Medicine at Windber, Windber, PA, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Tu J, Kuang Z, Xie X, Wu S, Wu T, Chen S. Prognostic and predictive value of a mRNA signature in peripheral T-cell lymphomas: A mRNA expression analysis. J Cell Mol Med 2020; 25:84-95. [PMID: 33259129 PMCID: PMC7810961 DOI: 10.1111/jcmm.15851] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/25/2020] [Revised: 08/18/2020] [Accepted: 08/20/2020] [Indexed: 12/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Current international prognostic index is widely questioned on the risk stratification of peripheral T‐cell lymphoma and does not accurately predict the outcome for patients. We postulated that multiple mRNAs could combine into a model to improve risk stratification and helping clinicians make treatment decisions. In this study, the gene expression profiles were downloaded from the Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) database. Weighted gene co‐expression network analysis (WGCNA) was used to screening genes in selected module which most closely related to PTCLs, and then built a mRNA signature using a LASSO Cox regression model and validated the prognostic accuracy of it. Finally, a nomogram was constructed and the performance was assessed. A total of 799 WGCNA‐selected mRNAs in black module were identified, and a mRNA signature which based on DOCK2, GSTM1, H2AFY, KCNAB2, LAPTM5 and SYK for PTCLs was developed. Significantly statistical difference can be seen in overall survival of PTCLs between low‐risk group and high‐risk group (training set:hazard ratio [HR] 4.3, 95% CI 2.4‐7.4, P < .0001; internal testing set:hazard ratio [HR] 2.4, 95% CI 1.2‐4.8, P < .01; external testing set:hazard ratio [HR] 2.3, 95% CI 1.10‐4.7, P = .02). Furthermore, multivariate regression demonstrated that the signature was an independently prognostic factor. Moreover, the nomogram which combined the mRNA signature and multiple clinical factors suggesting that predicted survival probability agreed well with the actual survival probability. The signature is a reliable prognostic tool for patients with PTCLs, and it has the potential for clinicians to implement personalized therapeutic regimen for patients with PTCLs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jiannan Tu
- Department of Oncology, Nanping First Hospital Affiliated to Fujian Medical University, Nanping, China
| | - Zhixing Kuang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Nanping First Hospital Affiliated to Fujian Medical University, Nanping, China
| | - Xiaoliang Xie
- Department of Orthopedics, Shanghai Municipal Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Shanghai University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Shanghai, China
| | - Shizhen Wu
- Department of Oncology, Nanping First Hospital Affiliated to Fujian Medical University, Nanping, China
| | - Ting Wu
- Department of Oncology, Nanping First Hospital Affiliated to Fujian Medical University, Nanping, China
| | - Shengchi Chen
- Department of Oncology, Nanping First Hospital Affiliated to Fujian Medical University, Nanping, China
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Construction of circRNA-based ceRNA network to reveal the role of circRNAs in the progression and prognosis of metastatic clear cell renal cell carcinoma. Aging (Albany NY) 2020; 12:24184-24207. [PMID: 33223511 PMCID: PMC7762515 DOI: 10.18632/aging.104107] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/03/2020] [Accepted: 08/08/2020] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
CircRNAs are now under hot discussion as novel promising bio-markers for patients with clear cell renal cell carcinoma. The purpose of our study is to identify several circRNAs related to the metastasis and progression of clear cell renal cell carcinoma, and to further investigate the mechanism of their influence on tumor progression. The transcriptome data of ccRCC and clinical characteristics used in this study were downloaded from the The Cancer Genome Atlas and Gene Expression Omnibus database. A total of 114 circRNAs were found to be related to tumor initiation, progression and metastasis after the intersection. In addition, 14 miRNAs and 201 eligible mRNAs were selected as targets gene, respectively. CeRNA network was constructed based on 8 circRNAs, 14 miRNAs, and 201 mRNAs. Besides, another 6 hub genes were identified via the PPI network. It should be noted that only TRIM2 was confirmed as an independent prognostic factor, which was simultaneously significantly related to both clinical stage and pathological grade in clinical cohorts. Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes and Gene Ontology analysis indicated the possible function of TRIM2 in ccRCC progression, such as ubiquitin mediated protein hydrolysis, cell adhesion molecules, Th17 cell differentiation signaling pathway and so on. Gene set enrichment analysis analysis revealed that TRIM2 may be involved in ubiquitin mediated proteolysis, apoptosis, autophagy and citrate cycle TCA cycle. Hub circ_RNAs expressions were validated in ccRCC tissues and cell lines. Our study revealed that the hsa_circ_0002286 / has-mir-222-5p / TRIM2 axis played a critical role in the progression of ccRCC. Specifically, it may inhibit the metastasis and progression of ccRCC, which could serve as a potential therapeutic target.
Collapse
|
33
|
Wang Y, Luo M, Chen Y, Wang Y, Zhang B, Ren Z, Bao L, Wang Y, Wang JE, Fu YX, Luo W, Wang Y. ZMYND8 Expression in Breast Cancer Cells Blocks T-Lymphocyte Surveillance to Promote Tumor Growth. Cancer Res 2020; 81:174-186. [PMID: 33148660 DOI: 10.1158/0008-5472.can-20-1710] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/20/2020] [Revised: 10/05/2020] [Accepted: 10/30/2020] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Emerging studies indicate that DNA damage in cancer cells triggers antitumor immunity, but its intrinsic regulatory mechanism in breast cancer cells remains poorly understood. Here, we show that ZMYND8 is upregulated and inhibits micronucleus formation and DNA damage in breast cancer cells. Loss of ZMYND8 triggered activation of the DNA sensor cyclic guanosine monophosphate-adenosine monophosphate synthase in micronuclei, leading to further activation of the downstream signaling effectors stimulator of IFN genes and NF-κB, but not TANK-binding kinase 1 and IFN regulatory factor 3, thereby inducing the expression of IFNβ and IFN-stimulated genes (ISG) in breast cancer cells in vitro and tumors in vivo. ZMYND8 knockout (KO) in breast cancer cells promoted infiltration of CD4+ and CD8+ T cells, leading to tumor inhibition in syngeneic mouse models, which was significantly attenuated by treatment of anti-CD4/CD8-depleting antibodies or anti-IFNAR1 antibody and in immunodeficient Rag1 KO mice. In human breast tumors, ZMYND8 was negatively correlated with ISGs, CD4, CD8A, CD8B, and the tumor-lymphocyte infiltration phenotype. Collectively, these findings demonstrate that maintenance of genome stability by ZMYND8 causes breast cancer cells to evade cytotoxic T-lymphocyte surveillance, which leads to tumor growth. SIGNIFICANCE: These findings show that ZMYND8 is a new negative and intrinsic regulator of the innate immune response in breast tumor cells, and ZMYND8 may be a possible target for antitumor immunotherapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yong Wang
- Department of Pathology, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas
| | - Maowu Luo
- Department of Pathology, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas
| | - Yan Chen
- Department of Pathology, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas
| | - Yijie Wang
- Department of Pathology, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas
| | - Bo Zhang
- Department of Pathology, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas
| | - Zhenhua Ren
- Department of Pathology, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas
| | - Lei Bao
- Department of Pathology, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas
| | - Yanan Wang
- Department of Pathology, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas
| | - Jennifer E Wang
- Department of Pathology, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas
| | - Yang-Xin Fu
- Department of Pathology, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas
| | - Weibo Luo
- Department of Pathology, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas. .,Department of Pharmacology, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas
| | - Yingfei Wang
- Department of Pathology, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas. .,Department of Neurology, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Marra A, Trapani D, Viale G, Criscitiello C, Curigliano G. Practical classification of triple-negative breast cancer: intratumoral heterogeneity, mechanisms of drug resistance, and novel therapies. NPJ Breast Cancer 2020; 6:54. [PMID: 33088912 PMCID: PMC7568552 DOI: 10.1038/s41523-020-00197-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 155] [Impact Index Per Article: 38.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/29/2020] [Accepted: 09/17/2020] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) is not a unique disease, encompassing multiple entities with marked histopathological, transcriptomic and genomic heterogeneity. Despite several efforts, transcriptomic and genomic classifications have remained merely theoretic and most of the patients are being treated with chemotherapy. Driver alterations in potentially targetable genes, including PIK3CA and AKT, have been identified across TNBC subtypes, prompting the implementation of biomarker-driven therapeutic approaches. However, biomarker-based treatments as well as immune checkpoint inhibitor-based immunotherapy have provided contrasting and limited results so far. Accordingly, a better characterization of the genomic and immune contexture underpinning TNBC, as well as the translation of the lessons learnt in the metastatic disease to the early setting would improve patients' outcomes. The application of multi-omics technologies, biocomputational algorithms, assays for minimal residual disease monitoring and novel clinical trial designs are strongly warranted to pave the way toward personalized anticancer treatment for patients with TNBC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Antonio Marra
- Division of Early Drug Development for Innovative Therapies, IEO, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Via Ripamonti, 435, 20141 Milan, Italy
- Department of Oncology and Haemato-Oncology, University of Milano, Via Festa del Perdono, 7, 20122 Milan, Italy
| | - Dario Trapani
- Division of Early Drug Development for Innovative Therapies, IEO, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Via Ripamonti, 435, 20141 Milan, Italy
| | - Giulia Viale
- Division of Early Drug Development for Innovative Therapies, IEO, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Via Ripamonti, 435, 20141 Milan, Italy
| | - Carmen Criscitiello
- Division of Early Drug Development for Innovative Therapies, IEO, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Via Ripamonti, 435, 20141 Milan, Italy
| | - Giuseppe Curigliano
- Division of Early Drug Development for Innovative Therapies, IEO, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Via Ripamonti, 435, 20141 Milan, Italy
- Department of Oncology and Haemato-Oncology, University of Milano, Via Festa del Perdono, 7, 20122 Milan, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Liang H, Li H, Xie Z, Jin T, Chen Y, Lv Z, Tan X, Li J, Han G, He W, Qiu N, Jiang M, Zhou J, Xia H, Zhan Y, Cui L, Guo W, Huang J, Zhang X, Wu YL. Quantitative multiplex immunofluorescence analysis identifies infiltrating PD1 + CD8 + and CD8 + T cells as predictive of response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer. Thorac Cancer 2020; 11:2941-2954. [PMID: 32894006 PMCID: PMC7529566 DOI: 10.1111/1759-7714.13639] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/05/2020] [Revised: 08/09/2020] [Accepted: 08/10/2020] [Indexed: 12/31/2022] Open
Abstract
Background This study aimed to explore the potentially predictive role and dynamic changes of immune checkpoints on T cell subsets in patients with breast cancer receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapies. Methods Fluorescent multiplex immunohistochemistry (mIHC) was used to stain CD4, CD8, PD1, TIM3, and cytokeratins simultaneously in paired breast cancer samples before and after neoadjuvant therapies (NAT) in a prospective cohort (n = 50). Singleplex IHC was conducted to stain for CD3 in 100 cases with inclusion of extra retrospective 50 cases. Cell levels were correlated with clinicopathological parameters and pathological complete response (pCR). Results In pretreatment tumors, the percentages of infiltrating CD8+, PD1+, PD1+CD8+, and the ratio of PD1+CD8+/CD8+ cells, were higher in pCR than non‐pCR patients in either the stromal or intratumoral area, but PD1+CD4+, TIM3+CD4+, TIM3+CD8+ cells and CD4+/CD8+ ratio was not. Multivariate analyses showed that the percentage of intratumoral CD8+ cells (OR, 1.712; 95% CI: 1.052–2.786; P = 0.030) and stromal PD1+CD8+/CD8+ ratio (OR, 1.109; 95% CI: 1.009–1.218; P = 0.032) were significantly associated with pCR. Dynamically, reduction in the percentages of PD1+, CD8+ and PD1+CD8+ cells after therapy strongly correlated with pCR. Notably, incremental percentages of PD1+CD8+ cells, rather than TIM3+CD8+, were shown in tumors from non‐pCR patients after NAT. CD3 staining confirmed the percentage of T cells were associated with pCR. Conclusions PD1+CD8+ rather than TIM3+CD8+ cells are main predictive components within tumor‐infiltrating T cells in NAT breast cancer patients. Dynamically incremental levels of PD1+CD8+ cells occurred in non‐pCR cases after NAT, suggesting the combination of chemotherapy with PD1 inhibition might benefit these patients. Key points Significant findings of the study PD1+CD8+, rather than TIM3+CD8+, T cells are the main component to predict the response of neoadjuvant therapies in breast cancer.
What this study adds Incremental levels of PD1+CD8+ T cells in non‐pCR post‐NAT tumors suggest PD1 inhibition might benefit in the neoadjuvant setting.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hongling Liang
- The Second School of Clinical Medicine, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China.,Department of Breast Oncology, Affiliated Cancer Hospital & Institute of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Hongsheng Li
- Department of Breast Oncology, Affiliated Cancer Hospital & Institute of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Zhi Xie
- Guangdong Lung Cancer Institute, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Translational Medicine in Lung Cancer, Guangdong Provincial People's Hospital, Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences, School of Medicine, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou, China
| | - Tianen Jin
- Guangzhou DaAn Clinical Laboratory Center, Guangzhou, China
| | - Yu Chen
- Guangdong Lung Cancer Institute, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Translational Medicine in Lung Cancer, Guangdong Provincial People's Hospital, Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences, School of Medicine, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou, China
| | - Zhiyi Lv
- Guangdong Lung Cancer Institute, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Translational Medicine in Lung Cancer, Guangdong Provincial People's Hospital, Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences, School of Medicine, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou, China
| | - Xiaojun Tan
- Department of Pathology, Affiliated Cancer Hospital & Institute of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Jia Li
- Graduate School of Arts and Science, Columbia University in the City of New York, New York, New York, USA
| | - Guodong Han
- Department of Breast Oncology, Affiliated Cancer Hospital & Institute of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Weixing He
- Department of Breast Oncology, Affiliated Cancer Hospital & Institute of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Ni Qiu
- Department of Breast Oncology, Affiliated Cancer Hospital & Institute of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Ming Jiang
- Department of Breast Oncology, Affiliated Cancer Hospital & Institute of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Jie Zhou
- Department of Breast Oncology, Affiliated Cancer Hospital & Institute of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Haoming Xia
- Department of Breast Oncology, Affiliated Cancer Hospital & Institute of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Yongtao Zhan
- Department of Breast Oncology, Affiliated Cancer Hospital & Institute of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Lulu Cui
- Department of Breast Oncology, Affiliated Cancer Hospital & Institute of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Weiling Guo
- Department of Breast Oncology, Affiliated Cancer Hospital & Institute of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Jianqing Huang
- Department of Breast Oncology, Affiliated Cancer Hospital & Institute of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Xuchao Zhang
- The Second School of Clinical Medicine, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China.,Guangdong Lung Cancer Institute, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Translational Medicine in Lung Cancer, Guangdong Provincial People's Hospital, Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences, School of Medicine, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou, China
| | - Yi-Long Wu
- The Second School of Clinical Medicine, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China.,Guangdong Lung Cancer Institute, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Translational Medicine in Lung Cancer, Guangdong Provincial People's Hospital, Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences, School of Medicine, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou, China
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Herrera Juarez M, Tolosa Ortega P, Sanchez de Torre A, Ciruelos Gil E. Biology of the Triple-Negative Breast Cancer: Immunohistochemical, RNA, and DNA Features. Breast Care (Basel) 2020; 15:208-216. [PMID: 32774214 DOI: 10.1159/000508758] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/26/2020] [Accepted: 05/19/2020] [Indexed: 12/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Background The triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) constitutes a heterogeneous disease with an aggressive behavior and a poor prognosis. A better understanding of its biology is required to identify new biomarkers and improve clinical outcomes. Summary To date, the definition and classification of TNBC depends on a multiomic approach including immunohistochemistry (IHC), genomic, and transcriptomic features, and the tumor immune landscape. The development of new technologies has allowed us to sequence the whole cancer genome. The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) and next-generation sequencing have led to a greater knowledge of DNA alterations such as TP53 or BRCA mutations, copy number variations, and DNA methylations. In addition, gene expression profiling has allowed to define a molecular intrinsic classification of TNBC based on mRNA. IHC and genomic profiling are also necessary to identify new immune biomarkers such as the presence of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes and the expression of immune checkpoint molecules. Key Messages This review aimed to provide recent knowledge of TNBC biology and classification focused on IHC, transcriptomics, genomic features, and the new immune biomarkers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mercedes Herrera Juarez
- Division of Gyneco-Oncology, Breast Cancer Unit, University Hospital 12 de Octubre, Madrid, Spain
| | - Pablo Tolosa Ortega
- Division of Gyneco-Oncology, Breast Cancer Unit, University Hospital 12 de Octubre, Madrid, Spain
| | - Ana Sanchez de Torre
- Division of Gyneco-Oncology, Breast Cancer Unit, University Hospital 12 de Octubre, Madrid, Spain
| | - Eva Ciruelos Gil
- Division of Gyneco-Oncology, Breast Cancer Unit, University Hospital 12 de Octubre, Madrid, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Wei LY, Zhang XJ, Wang L, Hu LN, Zhang XD, Li L, Gao JN. A Six-Epithelial-Mesenchymal Transition Gene Signature May Predict Metastasis of Triple-Negative Breast Cancer. Onco Targets Ther 2020; 13:6497-6509. [PMID: 32753890 PMCID: PMC7342558 DOI: 10.2147/ott.s256818] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/10/2020] [Accepted: 06/13/2020] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Pathological complete response (pCR) to neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) is associated with favourable outcomes of patients with triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC). However, a proportion of TNBC patients with the residual disease do not relapse and achieve long-term survival. The aim of this study was to identify biomarkers that predict clinical outcomes in these patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS A retrospective series of 10 TNBC patients who displayed non-pCR to NACT were included in the discovery cohort. Total RNA from pre-NACT core biopsies and paired surgical specimens were subjected to the Affymetrix Human Transcriptome Array. Gene set enrichment analysis (GSEA) was used to identify signal pathways and gene signatures associated with metastasis. The Cox proportional hazard model and Kaplan-Meier survival curves were employed to assess the prognostic value of the identified signature in two independent TNBC datasets included in Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO). RESULTS The epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT) pathway was markedly more enriched in pre- (NES = 1.92; p.adjust = 0.019) and post-NACT samples (NES = 2.02; p.adjust = 0.010) from patients who developed metastasis after NACT. A subset of 6 EMT genes including LUM, SFRP4, COL6A3, MMP2, CXCL12, and HTRA1 were expressed constantly at higher levels in samples from patients who progressed to metastatic disease. The potential of the 6-EMT gene signature to predict TNBC metastasis after NACT was validated with a GEO dataset (HR=0.36, p=0.0008, 95% CI: 0.200-0.658). Moreover, the signature appeared of predictive value in another GEO dataset of TNBC patients who received surgery followed by adjuvant chemotherapy (HR = 0.46, 95% CI: 0.225-0.937). CONCLUSION Expression analysis of the 6-EMT gene signature at diagnosis may be of predictive value for metastasis in TNCB patients who did not achieve pCR to NACT and for patients treated with surgery in combination with adjuvant therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Li Yuan Wei
- Department of Breast Surgery, Shanxi Bethune Hospital, Taiyuan, People’s Republic of China
| | - Xiao Jun Zhang
- Department of Breast Surgery, Shanxi Bethune Hospital, Taiyuan, People’s Republic of China
| | - Li Wang
- School of Basic Medicine Sciences, Academy of Medical Science, Zhengzhou University, Henan450053, People’s Republic of China
| | - Li Na Hu
- Department of Pathology, Shanxi Bethune Hospital, Taiyuan, People’s Republic of China
| | - Xu Dong Zhang
- Translational Research Institute, Henan Provincial People’s Hospital, Academy of Medical Science, Zhengzhou University, Henan450053, People’s Republic of China
- School of Biomedical Sciences and Pharmacy, The University of Newcastle, Callaghan, NSW, Australia
| | - Li Li
- Department of Pathology, Shanxi Bethune Hospital, Taiyuan, People’s Republic of China
| | - Jin Nan Gao
- Department of Breast Surgery, Shanxi Bethune Hospital, Taiyuan, People’s Republic of China
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
Identification of a prognostic LncRNA signature for ER-positive, ER-negative and triple-negative breast cancers. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2020; 183:95-105. [PMID: 32601968 DOI: 10.1007/s10549-020-05770-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/01/2019] [Accepted: 06/23/2020] [Indexed: 12/20/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE The development of multi-gene signatures has led to improvements in identification of breast cancer patients at high risk of recurrence. The prognostic power of commercially available gene signatures is mostly restricted to estrogen receptor (ER)-positive breast cancer. On the contrary, immune-related gene signatures predict prognosis only in ER-negative breast cancer. This study aimed to develop a better prognostic signature for breast cancer. METHODS The expressions of long non-coding RNA (lncRNA) genes from 30 independent microarray datasets with a total of 4813 samples were analyzed. A prognostic lncRNA signature was developed based on likelihood-ratio Cox regression analysis. Survival analysis was used to compare the prognostic efficiencies of our signature and 10 previously reported prognostic gene signatures. RESULTS Cox regression analysis on 30 independent datasets showed that the 6-lncRNA signature identified in this study performed as well as five commercially available signatures in recurrence prediction for ER-positive breast cancer. In ER-negative breast cancer, this lncRNA signature was as prognostic as three immune-related gene signatures. Moreover, our lncRNA signature also demonstrated a good capacity to predict recurrence risk for triple-negative breast cancer. Function analysis showed that several lncRNAs in this signature were probably involved in cell proliferation and immune processes. CONCLUSIONS A six-LncRNA signature was identified that is prognostic for ER-positive, ER-negative, and triple-negative breast cancers and thus deserves further validation in prospective studies.
Collapse
|
39
|
Priming the tumor immune microenvironment with chemo(radio)therapy: A systematic review across tumor types. Biochim Biophys Acta Rev Cancer 2020; 1874:188386. [PMID: 32540465 DOI: 10.1016/j.bbcan.2020.188386] [Citation(s) in RCA: 65] [Impact Index Per Article: 16.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/29/2020] [Revised: 06/05/2020] [Accepted: 06/08/2020] [Indexed: 12/23/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Chemotherapy (CT), radiotherapy (RT), and chemoradiotherapy (CRT) are able to alter the composition of the tumor immune microenvironment (TIME). Understanding the effect of these modalities on the TIME could aid in the development of improved treatment strategies. Our aim was to systematically review studies investigating the influence of CT, RT or CRT on different TIME markers. METHODS The EMBASE (Ovid) and PubMed databases were searched until January 2019 for prospective or retrospective studies investigating the dynamics of the local TIME in cancer patients (pts) treated with CT, RT or CRT, with or without targeted agents. Studies could either compare baseline and follow-up specimens - before and after treatment - or a treated versus an untreated cohort. Studies were included if they used immunohistochemistry and/or flow cytometry to assess the TIME. RESULTS In total we included 110 studies (n = 8850 pts), of which n = 89 (n = 6295 pts) compared pre-treatment to post-treatment specimens and n = 25 (n = 2555 pts) a treated versus an untreated cohort (4 studies conducted both comparisons). For several tumor types (among others; breast, cervical, esophageal, ovarian, rectal, lung mesothelioma and pancreatic cancer) remodeling of the TIME was observed, leading to a potentially more immunologically active microenvironment, including one or more of the following: an increase in CD3 or CD8 lymphocytes, a decrease in FOXP3 Tregs and increased PD-L1 expression. Both CT and CRT were able to immunologically alter the TIME. CONCLUSION The TIME of several tumor types is significantly altered after conventional therapy creating opportunities for concurrent or sequential immunotherapy.
Collapse
|
40
|
Diana A, Carlino F, Franzese E, Oikonomidou O, Criscitiello C, De Vita F, Ciardiello F, Orditura M. Early Triple Negative Breast Cancer: Conventional Treatment and Emerging Therapeutic Landscapes. Cancers (Basel) 2020; 12:E819. [PMID: 32235297 PMCID: PMC7225917 DOI: 10.3390/cancers12040819] [Citation(s) in RCA: 55] [Impact Index Per Article: 13.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/29/2020] [Revised: 03/19/2020] [Accepted: 03/27/2020] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Triple negative breast cancers (TNBCs) are characterized by worse prognosis, higher propensity to earlier metastases, and shorter survival after recurrence compared with other breast cancer subtypes. Anthracycline- and taxane-based chemotherapy is still the mainstay of treatment in early stages, although several escalation approaches have been evaluated to improve survival outcomes. The addition of platinum salts to standard neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) remains controversial due to the lack of clear survival advantage, and the use of adjuvant capecitabine represents a valid treatment option in TNBC patients with residual disease after NACT. Recently, several clinical trials showed promising results through the use of poly ADP-ribose polymerase (PARP) inhibitors and by incorporating immunotherapy with chemotherapy, enriching treatment options beyond conventional cytotoxic agents. In this review, we provided an overview on the current standard of care and a comprehensive update of the recent advances in the management of early stage TNBC and focused on the latest emerging biomarkers and their clinical application to select the best therapeutic strategy in this hard-to-treat population.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anna Diana
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Precision Medicine, School of Medicine, “Luigi Vanvitelli” University of Campania, 80131 Naples, Italy; (F.C.); (E.F.); (F.D.V.); (F.C.); (M.O.)
| | - Francesca Carlino
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Precision Medicine, School of Medicine, “Luigi Vanvitelli” University of Campania, 80131 Naples, Italy; (F.C.); (E.F.); (F.D.V.); (F.C.); (M.O.)
| | - Elisena Franzese
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Precision Medicine, School of Medicine, “Luigi Vanvitelli” University of Campania, 80131 Naples, Italy; (F.C.); (E.F.); (F.D.V.); (F.C.); (M.O.)
| | - Olga Oikonomidou
- Cancer Research UK, Edinburgh Centre, MRC Institute Genetics and Molecular Medicine, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh EH4 2XR, UK;
| | | | - Ferdinando De Vita
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Precision Medicine, School of Medicine, “Luigi Vanvitelli” University of Campania, 80131 Naples, Italy; (F.C.); (E.F.); (F.D.V.); (F.C.); (M.O.)
| | - Fortunato Ciardiello
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Precision Medicine, School of Medicine, “Luigi Vanvitelli” University of Campania, 80131 Naples, Italy; (F.C.); (E.F.); (F.D.V.); (F.C.); (M.O.)
| | - Michele Orditura
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Precision Medicine, School of Medicine, “Luigi Vanvitelli” University of Campania, 80131 Naples, Italy; (F.C.); (E.F.); (F.D.V.); (F.C.); (M.O.)
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
Pellegrino B, Musolino A, Llop-Guevara A, Serra V, De Silva P, Hlavata Z, Sangiolo D, Willard-Gallo K, Solinas C. Homologous Recombination Repair Deficiency and the Immune Response in Breast Cancer: A Literature Review. Transl Oncol 2020; 13:410-422. [PMID: 31901781 PMCID: PMC6948367 DOI: 10.1016/j.tranon.2019.10.010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 50] [Impact Index Per Article: 12.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/08/2019] [Accepted: 10/16/2019] [Indexed: 12/11/2022] Open
Abstract
The success of cancer immunotherapy with immune checkpoint blockade (ICB) has demonstrated the importance of targeting a preexisting immune response in a broad spectrum of tumors. This is particularly novel and relevant for less immunogenic tumors, such as breast cancer (BC), where the efficacy of ICB was more evident in the triple-negative (TNBC) subtype, in earlier stages, and in association with chemotherapy. Tumors harboring homologous recombination DNA repair (HRR) deficiency (HRD) are supposed to have a higher number of mutations, hence a higher tumor mutational burden, which could potentially make them more sensitive to immunotherapy. However, the mechanisms involved in ICB sensitivity and patient selection are still yet to be defined in BC: whether the innate system could play a role and how the adaptive immunity could be linked with HRR pathways are the two key points of debate that we will discuss in this article. The aim of this review was to close the loop between what was found in clinical trial results so far, go back to laboratory theory and preclinical results and point out what needs to be clarified from now on.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- B Pellegrino
- Medical Oncology and Breast Unit, University Hospital of Parma, Parma, Italy.
| | - A Musolino
- Medical Oncology and Breast Unit, University Hospital of Parma, Parma, Italy
| | - A Llop-Guevara
- Experimental Therapeutics Group, Vall D'Hebron Institute of Oncology, Barcelona, Spain
| | - V Serra
- Experimental Therapeutics Group, Vall D'Hebron Institute of Oncology, Barcelona, Spain
| | - P De Silva
- Molecular Immunology Unit, Institut Jules Bordet and Universitè Libre de Bruxelles, Bruxelles, Belgium
| | - Z Hlavata
- Medical Oncology Department, CHR Mons-Hainaut, Mons, Belgium
| | - D Sangiolo
- Department of Oncology, University of Torino, Torino, Italy; Candiolo Cancer Institute FPO-IRCCS, Candiolo, Torino, Italy
| | - K Willard-Gallo
- Molecular Immunology Unit, Institut Jules Bordet and Universitè Libre de Bruxelles, Bruxelles, Belgium
| | - C Solinas
- Molecular Immunology Unit, Institut Jules Bordet and Universitè Libre de Bruxelles, Bruxelles, Belgium; Regional Hospital of Valle D'Aosta, Aosta, Italy.
| |
Collapse
|
42
|
Badr N, Berditchevski F, Shaaban A. The Immune Microenvironment in Breast Carcinoma: Predictive and Prognostic Role in the Neoadjuvant Setting. Pathobiology 2019; 87:61-74. [DOI: 10.1159/000504055] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/13/2019] [Accepted: 10/09/2019] [Indexed: 11/19/2022] Open
|
43
|
Ochi T, Bianchini G, Ando M, Nozaki F, Kobayashi D, Criscitiello C, Curigliano G, Iwamoto T, Niikura N, Takei H, Yoshida A, Takei J, Suzuki K, Yamauchi H, Hayashi N. Predictive and prognostic value of stromal tumour-infiltrating lymphocytes before and after neoadjuvant therapy in triple negative and HER2-positive breast cancer. Eur J Cancer 2019; 118:41-48. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2019.05.014] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/01/2019] [Revised: 04/28/2019] [Accepted: 05/04/2019] [Indexed: 10/26/2022]
|
44
|
Kazanietz MG, Durando M, Cooke M. CXCL13 and Its Receptor CXCR5 in Cancer: Inflammation, Immune Response, and Beyond. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne) 2019; 10:471. [PMID: 31354634 PMCID: PMC6639976 DOI: 10.3389/fendo.2019.00471] [Citation(s) in RCA: 160] [Impact Index Per Article: 32.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/03/2019] [Accepted: 06/28/2019] [Indexed: 12/25/2022] Open
Abstract
It is well-established that the chemokine C-X-C motif ligand 13 (CXCL13) and its receptor, the G-protein coupled receptor (GPCR) CXCR5, play fundamental roles in inflammatory, infectious and immune responses. Originally identified as a B-cell chemoattractant, CXCL13 exerts important functions in lymphoid neogenesis, and has been widely implicated in the pathogenesis of a number of autoimmune diseases and inflammatory conditions, as well as in lymphoproliferative disorders. Current evidence also indicates that the CXCL13:CXCR5 axis orchestrates cell-cell interactions that regulate lymphocyte infiltration within the tumor microenvironment, thereby determining responsiveness to cytotoxic and immune-targeted therapies. In this review, we provide a comprehensive perspective of the involvement of CXCL13 and its receptor in cancer progression. Studies in recent years postulated novel roles for this chemokine in controlling the cancer cell phenotype, and suggest important functions in the growth and metastatic dissemination of solid tumors. Carcinogens have been found to induce CXCL13 production, and production of this chemokine within the tumor milieu has been shown to impact the proliferation, migration, and invasive properties of cancer cells. Thus, the complex networks of cellular interactions involving tumoral CXCL13 and CXCR5 integrate to promote cancer cell autonomous and non-autonomous responses, highlighting the relevance of autocrine and paracrine interactions in dictating the cancer phenotype. Dissecting the molecular and signaling events regulated by CXCL13 and how this chemokine dynamically controls the interaction between the cancer cell and the tumor microenvironment is key to identify novel effectors and therapeutic targets for cancer treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Mariana Cooke
- Department of Systems Pharmacology and Translational Therapeutics, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, United States
| |
Collapse
|
45
|
Marra A, Viale G, Curigliano G. Recent advances in triple negative breast cancer: the immunotherapy era. BMC Med 2019; 17:90. [PMID: 31068190 PMCID: PMC6507064 DOI: 10.1186/s12916-019-1326-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 232] [Impact Index Per Article: 46.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/12/2019] [Accepted: 04/15/2019] [Indexed: 12/26/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Several accomplishments have been achieved in triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) research over the last year. The phase III IMpassion130 trial comparing chemotherapy plus atezolizumab versus chemotherapy plus placebo brought breast cancer into the immunotherapy era. Nevertheless, despite encouraging results being obtained in this trial, many open questions remain. MAIN BODY A positive overall survival outcome was achieved only in PD-L1+ TNBC patients, suggesting a need to enrich the patient population more likely to benefit from an immunotherapeutic approach. Moreover, it remains unknown whether single-agent immunotherapy might be a good option for some patients. In this context, the discovery and implementation of novel and appropriate biomarkers are required. Focusing on the early onset of TNBC, neoadjuvant trials could represent excellent in vivo platforms to test immunotherapy agents and their potential combinations, allowing the performance of translational studies for biomarker implementation and improved patient selection. CONCLUSION The aim of our review is to present recent advances in TNBC treatment and to discuss open issues in order to better define potential future directions for immunotherapy in TNBC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Antonio Marra
- Division of Early Drug Development for Innovative Therapy, European Institute of Oncology (IEO), IRCCS, Milan, Italy.,Department of Oncology and Haematology, University of Milano, Milano, Italy
| | - Giulia Viale
- Division of Early Drug Development for Innovative Therapy, European Institute of Oncology (IEO), IRCCS, Milan, Italy.,Department of Oncology and Haematology, University of Milano, Milano, Italy
| | - Giuseppe Curigliano
- Division of Early Drug Development for Innovative Therapy, European Institute of Oncology (IEO), IRCCS, Milan, Italy. .,Department of Oncology and Haematology, University of Milano, Milano, Italy.
| |
Collapse
|
46
|
Ferreira MA, Gamazon ER, Al-Ejeh F, Aittomäki K, Andrulis IL, Anton-Culver H, Arason A, Arndt V, Aronson KJ, Arun BK, Asseryanis E, Azzollini J, Balmaña J, Barnes DR, Barrowdale D, Beckmann MW, Behrens S, Benitez J, Bermisheva M, Białkowska K, Blomqvist C, Bogdanova NV, Bojesen SE, Bolla MK, Borg A, Brauch H, Brenner H, Broeks A, Burwinkel B, Caldés T, Caligo MA, Campa D, Campbell I, Canzian F, Carter J, Carter BD, Castelao JE, Chang-Claude J, Chanock SJ, Christiansen H, Chung WK, Claes KBM, Clarke CL, Couch FJ, Cox A, Cross SS, Czene K, Daly MB, de la Hoya M, Dennis J, Devilee P, Diez O, Dörk T, Dunning AM, Dwek M, Eccles DM, Ejlertsen B, Ellberg C, Engel C, Eriksson M, Fasching PA, Fletcher O, Flyger H, Friedman E, Frost D, Gabrielson M, Gago-Dominguez M, Ganz PA, Gapstur SM, Garber J, García-Closas M, García-Sáenz JA, Gaudet MM, Giles GG, Glendon G, Godwin AK, Goldberg MS, Goldgar DE, González-Neira A, Greene MH, Gronwald J, Guénel P, Haiman CA, Hall P, Hamann U, He W, Heyworth J, Hogervorst FBL, Hollestelle A, Hoover RN, Hopper JL, Hulick PJ, Humphreys K, Imyanitov EN, Isaacs C, Jakimovska M, Jakubowska A, James PA, Janavicius R, Jankowitz RC, John EM, Johnson N, Joseph V, Karlan BY, Khusnutdinova E, Kiiski JI, Ko YD, Jones ME, Konstantopoulou I, Kristensen VN, Laitman Y, Lambrechts D, Lazaro C, Leslie G, Lester J, Lesueur F, Lindström S, Long J, Loud JT, Lubiński J, Makalic E, Mannermaa A, Manoochehri M, Margolin S, Maurer T, Mavroudis D, McGuffog L, Meindl A, Menon U, Michailidou K, Miller A, Montagna M, Moreno F, Moserle L, Mulligan AM, Nathanson KL, Neuhausen SL, Nevanlinna H, Nevelsteen I, Nielsen FC, Nikitina-Zake L, Nussbaum RL, Offit K, Olah E, Olopade OI, Olsson H, Osorio A, Papp J, Park-Simon TW, Parsons MT, Pedersen IS, Peixoto A, Peterlongo P, Pharoah PDP, Plaseska-Karanfilska D, Poppe B, Presneau N, Radice P, Rantala J, Rennert G, Risch HA, Saloustros E, Sanden K, Sawyer EJ, Schmidt MK, Schmutzler RK, Sharma P, Shu XO, Simard J, Singer CF, Soucy P, Southey MC, Spinelli JJ, Spurdle AB, Stone J, Swerdlow AJ, Tapper WJ, Taylor JA, Teixeira MR, Terry MB, Teulé A, Thomassen M, Thöne K, Thull DL, Tischkowitz M, Toland AE, Torres D, Truong T, Tung N, Vachon CM, van Asperen CJ, van den Ouweland AMW, van Rensburg EJ, Vega A, Viel A, Wang Q, Wappenschmidt B, Weitzel JN, Wendt C, Winqvist R, Yang XR, Yannoukakos D, Ziogas A, Kraft P, Antoniou AC, Zheng W, Easton DF, Milne RL, Beesley J, Chenevix-Trench G. Genome-wide association and transcriptome studies identify target genes and risk loci for breast cancer. Nat Commun 2019; 10:1741. [PMID: 30988301 PMCID: PMC6465407 DOI: 10.1038/s41467-018-08053-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 76] [Impact Index Per Article: 15.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/18/2018] [Accepted: 12/14/2018] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
Genome-wide association studies (GWAS) have identified more than 170 breast cancer susceptibility loci. Here we hypothesize that some risk-associated variants might act in non-breast tissues, specifically adipose tissue and immune cells from blood and spleen. Using expression quantitative trait loci (eQTL) reported in these tissues, we identify 26 previously unreported, likely target genes of overall breast cancer risk variants, and 17 for estrogen receptor (ER)-negative breast cancer, several with a known immune function. We determine the directional effect of gene expression on disease risk measured based on single and multiple eQTL. In addition, using a gene-based test of association that considers eQTL from multiple tissues, we identify seven (and four) regions with variants associated with overall (and ER-negative) breast cancer risk, which were not reported in previous GWAS. Further investigation of the function of the implicated genes in breast and immune cells may provide insights into the etiology of breast cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Manuel A Ferreira
- Department of Genetics and Computational Biology, QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute, Brisbane, QLD, 4006, Australia.
| | - Eric R Gamazon
- Division of Genetic Medicine, Department of Medicine, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, 37235, USA
- Clare Hall, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, CB3 9AL, UK
| | - Fares Al-Ejeh
- Department of Genetics and Computational Biology, QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute, Brisbane, QLD, 4006, Australia
| | - Kristiina Aittomäki
- Department of Clinical Genetics, Helsinki University Hospital, University of Helsinki, 00290, Helsinki, Finland
| | - Irene L Andrulis
- Fred A. Litwin Center for Cancer Genetics, Lunenfeld-Tanenbaum Research Institute of Mount Sinai Hospital, Toronto, ON, M5G 1X5, Canada
- Department of Molecular Genetics, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, M5S 1A8, Canada
| | - Hoda Anton-Culver
- Department of Epidemiology, Genetic Epidemiology Research Institute, University of California Irvine, Irvine, CA, USA, 92617
| | - Adalgeir Arason
- Department of Pathology, Landspitali University Hospital, 101, Reykjavik, Iceland
- BMC (Biomedical Centre), Faculty of Medicine, University of Iceland, 101, Reykjavik, Iceland
| | - Volker Arndt
- Division of Clinical Epidemiology and Aging Research, C070, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), 69120, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Kristan J Aronson
- Department of Public Health Sciences, and Cancer Research Institute, Queen's University, Kingston, ON, K7L 3N6, Canada
| | - Banu K Arun
- Department of Breast Medical Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, 77030, USA
| | - Ella Asseryanis
- Dept of OB/GYN and Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, 1090, Vienna, Austria
| | - Jacopo Azzollini
- Unit of Medical Genetics, Department of Medical Oncology and Hematology, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori (INT), 20133, Milan, Italy
| | - Judith Balmaña
- Oncogenetics Group, Vall dHebron Institute of Oncology (VHIO), 8035, Barcelona, Spain
- Department of Medical Oncology, Vall d'Hebron Institute of Oncology (VHIO), University Hospital, Vall d'Hebron, 08035, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Daniel R Barnes
- Centre for Cancer Genetic Epidemiology, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, CB1 8RN, UK
| | - Daniel Barrowdale
- Centre for Cancer Genetic Epidemiology, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, CB1 8RN, UK
| | - Matthias W Beckmann
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Comprehensive Cancer Center ER-EMN, University Hospital Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-University Erlangen-Nuremberg, 91054, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Sabine Behrens
- Division of Cancer Epidemiology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), 69120, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Javier Benitez
- Centro de Investigación en Red de Enfermedades Raras (CIBERER), 46010, Valencia, Spain
- Human Cancer Genetics Programme, Spanish National Cancer Research Centre (CNIO), 28029, Madrid, Spain
| | - Marina Bermisheva
- Institute of Biochemistry and Genetics, Ufa Federal Research Centre of Russian Academy of Sciences, 450054, Ufa, Russia
| | - Katarzyna Białkowska
- Department of Genetics and Pathology, Pomeranian Medical University, 71-252, Szczecin, Poland
| | - Carl Blomqvist
- Department of Oncology, Helsinki University Hospital, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, 00290, Finland
- Department of Oncology, Örebro University Hospital, 70185, Örebro, Sweden
| | - Natalia V Bogdanova
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hannover Medical School, 30625, Hannover, Germany
- Gynaecology Research Unit, Hannover Medical School, 30625, Hannover, Germany
- N.N. Alexandrov Research Institute of Oncology and Medical Radiology, 223040, Minsk, Belarus
| | - Stig E Bojesen
- Copenhagen General Population Study, Herlev and Gentofte Hospital, Copenhagen University Hospital, 2730, Herlev, Denmark
- Department of Clinical Biochemistry, Herlev and Gentofte Hospital, Copenhagen University Hospital, 2730, Herlev, Denmark
- Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, 2200, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Manjeet K Bolla
- Centre for Cancer Genetic Epidemiology, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, CB1 8RN, UK
| | - Ake Borg
- Department of Oncology, Lund University and Skåne University Hospital, 222 41, Lund, Sweden
| | - Hiltrud Brauch
- Dr. Margarete Fischer-Bosch-Institute of Clinical Pharmacology, 70376, Stuttgart, Germany
- University of Tübingen, 72074, Tübingen, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), 69120, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Hermann Brenner
- Division of Clinical Epidemiology and Aging Research, C070, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), 69120, Heidelberg, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), 69120, Heidelberg, Germany
- Division of Preventive Oncology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ) and National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), 69120, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Annegien Broeks
- Division of Molecular Pathology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute - Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, 1066 CX, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Barbara Burwinkel
- Molecular Epidemiology Group, C080, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), 69120, Heidelberg, Germany
- Molecular Biology of Breast Cancer, University Womens Clinic Heidelberg, University of Heidelberg, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Trinidad Caldés
- Molecular Oncology Laboratory, CIBERONC, Hospital Clinico San Carlos, IdISSC (Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria del Hospital Clínico San Carlos), 28040, Madrid, Spain
| | - Maria A Caligo
- Section of Molecular Genetics, Dept. of Laboratory Medicine, University Hospital of Pisa, 56126, Pisa, Italy
| | - Daniele Campa
- Division of Cancer Epidemiology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), 69120, Heidelberg, Germany
- Department of Biology, University of Pisa, 56126, Pisa, Italy
| | - Ian Campbell
- Research Department, Peter MacCallum Cancer Center, Melbourne, VIC, 3000, Australia
- Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, 3000, Australia
| | - Federico Canzian
- Genomic Epidemiology Group, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), 69120, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Jonathan Carter
- Department of Gynaecological Oncology, Chris O'Brien Lifehouse and The University of Sydney, Camperdown, NSW, 2050, Australia
| | - Brian D Carter
- Behavioral and Epidemiology Research Group, American Cancer Society, Atlanta, GA, USA, 30303
| | - Jose E Castelao
- Oncology and Genetics Unit, Instituto de Investigacion Sanitaria Galicia Sur (IISGS), Xerencia de Xestion Integrada de Vigo-SERGAS, 36312, Vigo, Spain
| | - Jenny Chang-Claude
- Division of Cancer Epidemiology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), 69120, Heidelberg, Germany
- Cancer Epidemiology Group, University Cancer Center Hamburg (UCCH), University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, 20246, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Stephen J Chanock
- Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Department of Health and Human Services, Bethesda, MD, 20850, USA
| | - Hans Christiansen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hannover Medical School, 30625, Hannover, Germany
| | - Wendy K Chung
- Departments of Pediatrics and Medicine, Columbia University, New York, NY, 10032, USA
| | | | - Christine L Clarke
- Westmead Institute for Medical Research, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, 2145, Australia
| | - Fergus J Couch
- Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, 55905, USA
| | - Angela Cox
- Sheffield Institute for Nucleic Acids (SInFoNiA), Department of Oncology and Metabolism, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, S10 2TN, UK
| | - Simon S Cross
- Academic Unit of Pathology, Department of Neuroscience, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, S10 2TN, UK
| | - Kamila Czene
- Department of Medical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Karolinska Institutet, 171 65, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Mary B Daly
- Department of Clinical Genetics, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, PA, 19111, USA
| | - Miguel de la Hoya
- Molecular Oncology Laboratory, CIBERONC, Hospital Clinico San Carlos, IdISSC (Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria del Hospital Clínico San Carlos), 28040, Madrid, Spain
| | - Joe Dennis
- Centre for Cancer Genetic Epidemiology, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, CB1 8RN, UK
| | - Peter Devilee
- Department of Pathology, Leiden University Medical Center, 2333 ZA, Leiden, The Netherlands
- Department of Human Genetics, Leiden University Medical Center, 2333 ZA, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Orland Diez
- Oncogenetics Group, Vall dHebron Institute of Oncology (VHIO), 8035, Barcelona, Spain
- Clinical and Molecular Genetics Area, University Hospital Vall dHebron, Barcelona, 08035, Spain
| | - Thilo Dörk
- Gynaecology Research Unit, Hannover Medical School, 30625, Hannover, Germany
| | - Alison M Dunning
- Centre for Cancer Genetic Epidemiology, Department of Oncology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, CB1 8RN, UK
| | - Miriam Dwek
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, Faculty of Science and Technology, University of Westminster, London, W1B 2HW, UK
| | - Diana M Eccles
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Southampton, Southampton, SO17 1BJ, UK
| | - Bent Ejlertsen
- Department of Oncology, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital, DK-2100, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Carolina Ellberg
- Department of Cancer Epidemiology, Clinical Sciences, Lund University, 222 42, Lund, Sweden
| | - Christoph Engel
- Institute for Medical Informatics, Statistics and Epidemiology, University of Leipzig, 04107, Leipzig, Germany
| | - Mikael Eriksson
- Department of Medical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Karolinska Institutet, 171 65, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Peter A Fasching
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Comprehensive Cancer Center ER-EMN, University Hospital Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-University Erlangen-Nuremberg, 91054, Erlangen, Germany
- David Geffen School of Medicine, Department of Medicine Division of Hematology and Oncology, University of California at Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, 90095, USA
| | - Olivia Fletcher
- The Breast Cancer Now Toby Robins Research Centre, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, SW7 3RP, UK
| | - Henrik Flyger
- Department of Breast Surgery, Herlev and Gentofte Hospital, Copenhagen University Hospital, 2730, Herlev, Denmark
| | - Eitan Friedman
- The Susanne Levy Gertner Oncogenetics Unit, Chaim Sheba Medical Center, 52621, Ramat Gan, Israel
- Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, 69978, Ramat Aviv, Israel
| | - Debra Frost
- Centre for Cancer Genetic Epidemiology, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, CB1 8RN, UK
| | - Marike Gabrielson
- Department of Medical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Karolinska Institutet, 171 65, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Manuela Gago-Dominguez
- Genomic Medicine Group, Galician Foundation of Genomic Medicine, Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria de Santiago de Compostela (IDIS), Complejo Hospitalario Universitario de Santiago, SERGAS, 15706, Santiago de Compostela, Spain
- Moores Cancer Center, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA, 92037, USA
| | - Patricia A Ganz
- Schools of Medicine and Public Health, Division of Cancer Prevention & Control Research, Jonsson Comprehensive Cancer Centre, UCLA, Los Angeles, CA, 90096-6900, USA
| | - Susan M Gapstur
- Behavioral and Epidemiology Research Group, American Cancer Society, Atlanta, GA, USA, 30303
| | - Judy Garber
- Cancer Risk and Prevention Clinic, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, 02215, USA
| | - Montserrat García-Closas
- Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Department of Health and Human Services, Bethesda, MD, 20850, USA
- Division of Genetics and Epidemiology, Institute of Cancer Research, London, SM2 5NG, UK
| | - José A García-Sáenz
- Medical Oncology Department, Hospital Clínico San Carlos, Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria San Carlos (IdISSC), Centro Investigación Biomédica en Red de Cáncer (CIBERONC), 28040, Madrid, Spain
| | - Mia M Gaudet
- Behavioral and Epidemiology Research Group, American Cancer Society, Atlanta, GA, USA, 30303
| | - Graham G Giles
- Cancer Epidemiology & Intelligence Division, Cancer Council Victoria, Melbourne, VIC, 3004, Australia
- Centre for Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, 3010, Australia
- Department of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, 3004, Australia
| | - Gord Glendon
- Fred A. Litwin Center for Cancer Genetics, Lunenfeld-Tanenbaum Research Institute of Mount Sinai Hospital, Toronto, ON, M5G 1X5, Canada
| | - Andrew K Godwin
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Kansas University Medical Center, Kansas City, KS, 66160, USA
| | - Mark S Goldberg
- Department of Medicine, McGill University, Montréal, QC, H4A 3J1, Canada
- Division of Clinical Epidemiology, Royal Victoria Hospital, McGill University, Montréal, QC, H4A 3J1, Canada
| | - David E Goldgar
- Department of Dermatology, Huntsman Cancer Institute, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, UT, 84112, USA
| | - Anna González-Neira
- Human Cancer Genetics Programme, Spanish National Cancer Research Centre (CNIO), 28029, Madrid, Spain
| | - Mark H Greene
- Clinical Genetics Branch, Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD, 20850-9772, USA
| | - Jacek Gronwald
- Department of Genetics and Pathology, Pomeranian Medical University, 71-252, Szczecin, Poland
| | - Pascal Guénel
- Cancer & Environment Group, Center for Research in Epidemiology and Population Health (CESP), INSERM, University Paris-Sud, University Paris-Saclay, 94805, Villejuif, France
| | - Christopher A Haiman
- Department of Preventive Medicine, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, 90033, USA
| | - Per Hall
- Department of Medical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Karolinska Institutet, 171 65, Stockholm, Sweden
- Department of Oncology, Södersjukhuset, 118 83, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Ute Hamann
- Molecular Genetics of Breast Cancer, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), 69120, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Wei He
- Department of Medical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Karolinska Institutet, 171 65, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Jane Heyworth
- School of Population and Global Health, The University of Western Australia, Perth, WA, 6009, Australia
| | - Frans B L Hogervorst
- Family Cancer Clinic, The Netherlands Cancer Institute - Antoni van Leeuwenhoek hospital, Amsterdam, 1066 CX, The Netherlands
| | - Antoinette Hollestelle
- Department of Medical Oncology, Family Cancer Clinic, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, 3015 CN, The Netherlands
| | - Robert N Hoover
- Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Department of Health and Human Services, Bethesda, MD, 20850, USA
| | - John L Hopper
- Centre for Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, 3010, Australia
| | - Peter J Hulick
- Center for Medical Genetics, NorthShore University HealthSystem, Evanston, IL, 60201, USA
- The University of Chicago Pritzker School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, 60637, USA
| | - Keith Humphreys
- Department of Medical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Karolinska Institutet, 171 65, Stockholm, Sweden
| | | | - Claudine Isaacs
- Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, Georgetown University, Washington, DC, 20007, USA
| | - Milena Jakimovska
- Research Centre for Genetic Engineering and Biotechnology 'Georgi D. Efremov', Macedonian Academy of Sciences and Arts, Skopje, 1000, Republic of Macedonia
| | - Anna Jakubowska
- Department of Genetics and Pathology, Pomeranian Medical University, 71-252, Szczecin, Poland
- Independent Laboratory of Molecular Biology and Genetic Diagnostics, Pomeranian Medical University, Szczecin, 71-252, Poland
| | - Paul A James
- Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, 3000, Australia
- Parkville Familial Cancer Centre, Peter MacCallum Cancer Center, Melbourne, VIC, 3000, Australia
| | - Ramunas Janavicius
- Hematology, oncology and transfusion medicine center, Dept. of Molecular and Regenerative Medicine, Vilnius University Hospital Santariskiu Clinics, Vilnius, 08410, Lithuania
| | - Rachel C Jankowitz
- Department of Medicine, Division of Hematology/Oncology, UPMC Hillman Cancer Center, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA, 15232, USA
| | - Esther M John
- Department of Medicine, Division of Oncology, Stanford Cancer Institute, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, 94304, USA
| | - Nichola Johnson
- The Breast Cancer Now Toby Robins Research Centre, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, SW7 3RP, UK
| | - Vijai Joseph
- Clinical Genetics Research Lab, Department of Cancer Biology and Genetics, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, 10065, USA
| | - Beth Y Karlan
- David Geffen School of Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of California at Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, 90095, USA
| | - Elza Khusnutdinova
- Institute of Biochemistry and Genetics, Ufa Federal Research Centre of Russian Academy of Sciences, 450054, Ufa, Russia
- Department of Genetics and Fundamental Medicine, Bashkir State Medical University, 450076, Ufa, Russia
| | - Johanna I Kiiski
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Helsinki University Hospital, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, 00290, Finland
| | - Yon-Dschun Ko
- Department of Internal Medicine, Evangelische Kliniken Bonn gGmbH, Johanniter Krankenhaus, Bonn, 53177, Germany
| | - Michael E Jones
- Division of Genetics and Epidemiology, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, SM2 5NG, UK
| | - Irene Konstantopoulou
- Molecular Diagnostics Laboratory, INRASTES, National Centre for Scientific Research 'Demokritos', Athens, 15310, Greece
| | - Vessela N Kristensen
- Department of Cancer Genetics, Institute for Cancer Research, Oslo University Hospital-Radiumhospitalet, Oslo, 0379, Norway
- Institute of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, 0450, Norway
| | - Yael Laitman
- The Susanne Levy Gertner Oncogenetics Unit, Chaim Sheba Medical Center, 52621, Ramat Gan, Israel
| | - Diether Lambrechts
- VIB Center for Cancer Biology, VIB, Leuven, 3001, Belgium
- Laboratory for Translational Genetics, Department of Human Genetics, University of Leuven, Leuven, 3000, Belgium
| | - Conxi Lazaro
- Molecular Diagnostic Unit, Hereditary Cancer Program, ICO-IDIBELL (Bellvitge Biomedical Research Institute, Catalan Institute of Oncology), CIBERONC, Barcelona, 08908, Spain
| | - Goska Leslie
- Centre for Cancer Genetic Epidemiology, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, CB1 8RN, UK
| | - Jenny Lester
- David Geffen School of Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of California at Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, 90095, USA
| | - Fabienne Lesueur
- Genetic Epidemiology of Cancer team, Inserm U900, Paris, 75005, France
- Institut Curie, Paris, 75005, France
- Mines ParisTech, Fontainebleau, 77305, France
| | - Sara Lindström
- Department of Epidemiology, University of Washington School of Public Health, Seattle, WA, 98195, USA
- Public Health Sciences Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA, 98109, USA
| | - Jirong Long
- Division of Epidemiology, Department of Medicine, Vanderbilt Epidemiology Center, Vanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center, Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville, TN, 37232, USA
| | - Jennifer T Loud
- Clinical Genetics Branch, Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD, 20850-9772, USA
| | - Jan Lubiński
- Department of Genetics and Pathology, Pomeranian Medical University, 71-252, Szczecin, Poland
| | - Enes Makalic
- Centre for Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, 3010, Australia
| | - Arto Mannermaa
- Translational Cancer Research Area, University of Eastern Finland, Kuopio, 70210, Finland
- Institute of Clinical Medicine, Pathology and Forensic Medicine, University of Eastern Finland, Kuopio, 70210, Finland
- Imaging Center, Department of Clinical Pathology, Kuopio University Hospital, Kuopio, 70210, Finland
| | - Mehdi Manoochehri
- Molecular Genetics of Breast Cancer, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), 69120, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Sara Margolin
- Department of Oncology, Södersjukhuset, 118 83, Stockholm, Sweden
- Department of Clinical Science and Education, Södersjukhuset, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, 118 83, Sweden
| | - Tabea Maurer
- Cancer Epidemiology Group, University Cancer Center Hamburg (UCCH), University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, 20246, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Dimitrios Mavroudis
- Department of Medical Oncology, University Hospital of Heraklion, Heraklion, 711 10, Greece
| | - Lesley McGuffog
- Centre for Cancer Genetic Epidemiology, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, CB1 8RN, UK
| | - Alfons Meindl
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University of Munich, Campus Großhadern, Munich, 81377, Germany
| | - Usha Menon
- MRC Clinical Trials Unit at UCL, Institute of Clinical Trials & Methodology, University College London, London, WC1V 6LJ, UK
| | - Kyriaki Michailidou
- Centre for Cancer Genetic Epidemiology, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, CB1 8RN, UK
- Department of Electron Microscopy/Molecular Pathology and The Cyprus School of Molecular Medicine, The Cyprus Institute of Neurology & Genetics, Nicosia, 1683, Cyprus
| | - Austin Miller
- NRG Oncology, Statistics and Data Management Center, Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Buffalo, NY, 14263, USA
| | - Marco Montagna
- Immunology and Molecular Oncology Unit, Veneto Institute of Oncology IOV - IRCCS, Padua, 35128, Italy
| | - Fernando Moreno
- Medical Oncology Department, Hospital Clínico San Carlos, Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria San Carlos (IdISSC), Centro Investigación Biomédica en Red de Cáncer (CIBERONC), 28040, Madrid, Spain
| | - Lidia Moserle
- Immunology and Molecular Oncology Unit, Veneto Institute of Oncology IOV - IRCCS, Padua, 35128, Italy
| | - Anna Marie Mulligan
- Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathobiology, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, M5S 1A8, Canada
- Laboratory Medicine Program, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, M5G 2C4, Canada
| | - Katherine L Nathanson
- Basser Center for BRCA, Abramson Cancer Center, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, 19066, USA
| | - Susan L Neuhausen
- Department of Population Sciences, Beckman Research Institute of City of Hope, Duarte, CA, 91010, USA
| | - Heli Nevanlinna
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Helsinki University Hospital, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, 00290, Finland
| | - Ines Nevelsteen
- Leuven Multidisciplinary Breast Center, Department of Oncology, Leuven Cancer Institute, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, 3000, Belgium
| | - Finn C Nielsen
- Center for Genomic Medicine, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital, Copenhagen, DK-2100, Denmark
| | | | - Robert L Nussbaum
- Cancer Genetics and Prevention Program, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, 94143-1714, USA
| | - Kenneth Offit
- Clinical Genetics Research Lab, Department of Cancer Biology and Genetics, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, 10065, USA
- Clinical Genetics Service, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, 10065, USA
| | - Edith Olah
- Department of Molecular Genetics, National Institute of Oncology, Budapest, 1122, Hungary
| | | | - Håkan Olsson
- Department of Cancer Epidemiology, Clinical Sciences, Lund University, 222 42, Lund, Sweden
| | - Ana Osorio
- Centro de Investigación en Red de Enfermedades Raras (CIBERER), 46010, Valencia, Spain
- Human Cancer Genetics Programme, Spanish National Cancer Research Centre (CNIO), 28029, Madrid, Spain
| | - Janos Papp
- Department of Molecular Genetics, National Institute of Oncology, Budapest, 1122, Hungary
| | | | - Michael T Parsons
- Department of Genetics and Computational Biology, QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute, Brisbane, QLD, 4006, Australia
| | - Inge Sokilde Pedersen
- Molecular Diagnostics, Aalborg University Hospital, Aalborg, 9000, Denmark
- Clinical Cancer Research Center, Aalborg University Hospital, Aalborg, 9000, Denmark
- Department of Clinical Medicine, Aalborg University, Aalborg, 9000, Denmark
| | - Ana Peixoto
- Department of Genetics, Portuguese Oncology Institute, Porto, 4220-072, Portugal
| | - Paolo Peterlongo
- Genome Diagnostics Program, IFOM - the FIRC (Italian Foundation for Cancer Research) Institute of Molecular Oncology, Milan, 20139, Italy
| | - Paul D P Pharoah
- Centre for Cancer Genetic Epidemiology, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, CB1 8RN, UK
- Centre for Cancer Genetic Epidemiology, Department of Oncology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, CB1 8RN, UK
| | - Dijana Plaseska-Karanfilska
- Research Centre for Genetic Engineering and Biotechnology 'Georgi D. Efremov', Macedonian Academy of Sciences and Arts, Skopje, 1000, Republic of Macedonia
| | - Bruce Poppe
- Centre for Medical Genetics, Ghent University, Gent, 9000, Belgium
| | - Nadege Presneau
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, Faculty of Science and Technology, University of Westminster, London, W1B 2HW, UK
| | - Paolo Radice
- Unit of Molecular Bases of Genetic Risk and Genetic Testing, Department of Research, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori (INT), Milan, 20133, Italy
| | - Johanna Rantala
- Clinical Genetics, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, 171 76, Sweden
| | - Gad Rennert
- Clalit National Cancer Control Center, Carmel Medical Center and Technion Faculty of Medicine, Haifa, 35254, Israel
| | - Harvey A Risch
- Chronic Disease Epidemiology, Yale School of Public Health, New Haven, CT, 06510, USA
| | | | - Kristin Sanden
- City of Hope Clinical Cancer Genetics Community Research Network, Duarte, CA, 91010, USA
| | - Elinor J Sawyer
- Research Oncology, Guy's Hospital, King's College London, London, SE1 9RT, UK
| | - Marjanka K Schmidt
- Division of Molecular Pathology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute - Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, 1066 CX, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Division of Psychosocial Research and Epidemiology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute - Antoni van Leeuwenhoek hospital, Amsterdam, 1066 CX, The Netherlands
| | - Rita K Schmutzler
- Center for Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, Cologne, 50937, Germany
- Center for Integrated Oncology (CIO), Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, 50937, Cologne, Germany
| | - Priyanka Sharma
- Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Oncology, University of Kansas Medical Center, Westwood, KS, 66205, USA
| | - Xiao-Ou Shu
- Division of Epidemiology, Department of Medicine, Vanderbilt Epidemiology Center, Vanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center, Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville, TN, 37232, USA
| | - Jacques Simard
- Genomics Center, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Québec - Université Laval, Research Center, Québec City, QC, G1V 4G2, Canada
| | - Christian F Singer
- Dept of OB/GYN and Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, 1090, Vienna, Austria
| | - Penny Soucy
- Genomics Center, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Québec - Université Laval, Research Center, Québec City, QC, G1V 4G2, Canada
| | - Melissa C Southey
- Precision Medicine, School of Clinical Sciences at Monash Health, Monash University, Clayton, VIC, 3168, Australia
- Department of Clinical Pathology, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, 3010, Australia
| | - John J Spinelli
- Population Oncology, BC Cancer, Vancouver, BC, V5Z 1G1, Canada
- School of Population and Public Health, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, V6T 1Z4, Canada
| | - Amanda B Spurdle
- Department of Genetics and Computational Biology, QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute, Brisbane, QLD, 4006, Australia
| | - Jennifer Stone
- Centre for Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, 3010, Australia
- The Curtin UWA Centre for Genetic Origins of Health and Disease, Curtin University and University of Western Australia, Perth, WA, 6000, Australia
| | - Anthony J Swerdlow
- Division of Genetics and Epidemiology, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, SM2 5NG, UK
- Division of Breast Cancer Research, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, SW7 3RP, UK
| | - William J Tapper
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Southampton, Southampton, SO17 1BJ, UK
| | - Jack A Taylor
- Epidemiology Branch, National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, NIH, Research Triangle Park, NC, 27709, USA
- Epigenetic and Stem Cell Biology Laboratory, National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, NIH, Research Triangle Park, NC, 27709, USA
| | - Manuel R Teixeira
- Department of Genetics, Portuguese Oncology Institute, Porto, 4220-072, Portugal
- Biomedical Sciences Institute (ICBAS), University of Porto, Porto, 4050-013, Portugal
| | - Mary Beth Terry
- Department of Epidemiology, Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University, New York, NY, 10032, USA
| | - Alex Teulé
- Genetic Counseling Unit, Hereditary Cancer Program, IDIBELL (Bellvitge Biomedical Research Institute),Catalan Institute of Oncology, CIBERONC, Barcelona, 08908, Spain
| | - Mads Thomassen
- Department of Clinical Genetics, Odense University Hospital, Odence C, 5000, Denmark
| | - Kathrin Thöne
- Cancer Epidemiology Group, University Cancer Center Hamburg (UCCH), University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, 20246, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Darcy L Thull
- Department of Medicine, Magee-Womens Hospital, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA, 15213, USA
| | - Marc Tischkowitz
- Program in Cancer Genetics, Departments of Human Genetics and Oncology, McGill University, Montréal, QC, H4A 3J1, Canada
- Department of Medical Genetics, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, CB2 0QQ, UK
| | - Amanda E Toland
- Department of Cancer Biology and Genetics, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, 43210, USA
| | - Diana Torres
- Molecular Genetics of Breast Cancer, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), 69120, Heidelberg, Germany
- Institute of Human Genetics, Pontificia Universidad Javeriana, Bogota, 110231, Colombia
| | - Thérèse Truong
- Cancer & Environment Group, Center for Research in Epidemiology and Population Health (CESP), INSERM, University Paris-Sud, University Paris-Saclay, 94805, Villejuif, France
| | - Nadine Tung
- Department of Medical Oncology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA, 02215, USA
| | - Celine M Vachon
- Department of Health Science Research, Division of Epidemiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, 55905, USA
| | - Christi J van Asperen
- Department of Clinical Genetics, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, 2333 ZA, The Netherlands
| | - Ans M W van den Ouweland
- Department of Clinical Genetics, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, 3015 CN, The Netherlands
| | | | - Ana Vega
- Fundación Pública galega Medicina Xenómica-SERGAS, Grupo de Medicina Xenómica-USC, CIBERER, IDIS, Santiago de Compostela, Spain
| | - Alessandra Viel
- Division of Functional onco-genomics and genetics, Centro di Riferimento Oncologico di Aviano (CRO), IRCCS, Aviano, 33081, Italy
| | - Qin Wang
- Centre for Cancer Genetic Epidemiology, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, CB1 8RN, UK
| | - Barbara Wappenschmidt
- Center for Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, Cologne, 50937, Germany
- Center for Integrated Oncology (CIO), Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, 50937, Cologne, Germany
| | | | - Camilla Wendt
- Department of Clinical Science and Education, Södersjukhuset, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, 118 83, Sweden
| | - Robert Winqvist
- Laboratory of Cancer Genetics and Tumor Biology, Cancer and Translational Medicine Research Unit, Biocenter Oulu, University of Oulu, Oulu, 90570, Finland
- Laboratory of Cancer Genetics and Tumor Biology, Northern Finland Laboratory Centre Oulu, Oulu, 90570, Finland
| | - Xiaohong R Yang
- Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Department of Health and Human Services, Bethesda, MD, 20850, USA
| | - Drakoulis Yannoukakos
- Molecular Diagnostics Laboratory, INRASTES, National Centre for Scientific Research 'Demokritos', Athens, 15310, Greece
| | - Argyrios Ziogas
- Department of Epidemiology, Genetic Epidemiology Research Institute, University of California Irvine, Irvine, CA, USA, 92617
| | - Peter Kraft
- Program in Genetic Epidemiology and Statistical Genetics, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, 02115, MA, USA
- Department of Epidemiology, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, 02115, USA
| | - Antonis C Antoniou
- Centre for Cancer Genetic Epidemiology, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, CB1 8RN, UK
| | - Wei Zheng
- Division of Epidemiology, Department of Medicine, Vanderbilt Epidemiology Center, Vanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center, Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville, TN, 37232, USA
| | - Douglas F Easton
- Centre for Cancer Genetic Epidemiology, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, CB1 8RN, UK
- Centre for Cancer Genetic Epidemiology, Department of Oncology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, CB1 8RN, UK
| | - Roger L Milne
- Cancer Epidemiology & Intelligence Division, Cancer Council Victoria, Melbourne, VIC, 3004, Australia
- Centre for Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, 3010, Australia
- Precision Medicine, School of Clinical Sciences at Monash Health, Monash University, Clayton, VIC, 3168, Australia
| | - Jonathan Beesley
- Department of Genetics and Computational Biology, QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute, Brisbane, QLD, 4006, Australia
| | - Georgia Chenevix-Trench
- Department of Genetics and Computational Biology, QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute, Brisbane, QLD, 4006, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
47
|
Luen SJ, Salgado R, Dieci MV, Vingiani A, Curigliano G, Gould RE, Castaneda C, D'Alfonso T, Sanchez J, Cheng E, Andreopoulou E, Castillo M, Adams S, Demaria S, Symmans WF, Michiels S, Loi S. Prognostic implications of residual disease tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes and residual cancer burden in triple-negative breast cancer patients after neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Ann Oncol 2019; 30:236-242. [PMID: 30590484 DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mdy547] [Citation(s) in RCA: 112] [Impact Index Per Article: 22.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND For primary triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC), higher pretreatment tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) correlates with increased pathologic complete response (pCR) rates, and improved survival. We evaluated the added prognostic value of residual disease (RD) TILs to residual cancer burden (RCB) in predicting survival post-NAC. PATIENTS AND METHODS We combined four TNBC NAC patient cohorts who did not achieve pCR. RD TILs were investigated for associations with recurrence-free survival (RFS), and overall survival (OS) using Cox models with stromal TILs as a continuous variable (per 10% increment). The likelihood ratio test was used to evaluate added prognostic value of RD TILs. RESULTS A total of 375 RD TNBC samples were evaluable for TILs and RCB. The median age was 50 years, with 62% receiving anthracycline/taxane chemotherapy. The RCB class after NAC was 11%, 50%, and 39% for I, II, and III, respectively. The median RD TIL level was 20% (IQR 10-40). There was a positive correlation between RD TIL levels and CD8+ T-cell density (ρ = 0.41). TIL levels were significantly lower with increasing post-NAC tumor (P = 0.005), nodal stage (P = 0.032), but did not differ by RCB class (P = 0.84). Higher RD TILs were significantly associated with improved RFS (HR: 0.86; 95% CI 0.79-0.92; P < 0.001), and improved OS (HR: 0.87; 95% CI 0.80-0.94; P < 0.001), and remained significant predictors in multivariate analysis (RFS P = 0.032; OS P = 0.038 for OS). RD TILs added significant prognostic value to multivariate models including RCB class (P < 0.001 for RFS; P = 0.021 for OS). The positive prognostic effect of RD TILs significantly differed by RCB class for RFS (PInt=0.003) and OS (PInt=0.008) with a greater magnitude of positive effect observed for RCB class II than class III. CONCLUSIONS TIL levels in TNBC RD are significantly associated with improved RFS and OS and add further prognostic information to RCB class, particularly in RCB class II.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- S J Luen
- Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
| | - R Salgado
- Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia; Department of Pathology, GZA-ZNA Hospitals, Antwerp, Belgium
| | - M V Dieci
- University of Padova, Padova, Italy; Veneto Institute of Oncology IOV - IRCCS, Padua, Italy
| | - A Vingiani
- European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - G Curigliano
- European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy; University of Milano, Milan, Italy
| | - R E Gould
- MD Anderson Cancer Centre, Houston, USA
| | - C Castaneda
- Instituto Nacional de Enfermedades Neoplasicas, Lima, Peru
| | - T D'Alfonso
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, USA
| | - J Sanchez
- Instituto Nacional de Enfermedades Neoplasicas, Lima, Peru
| | - E Cheng
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, USA
| | - E Andreopoulou
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, USA
| | - M Castillo
- Instituto Nacional de Enfermedades Neoplasicas, Lima, Peru
| | - S Adams
- New York University School of Medicine, New York, USA
| | - S Demaria
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, USA
| | | | - S Michiels
- Service de Biostatistique et d'Epidémiologie, Gustave Roussy, University Paris-Sud, University Paris-Saclay, Villejuif, France
| | - S Loi
- Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia.
| |
Collapse
|