1
|
Masuishi T, Taniguchi H, Kotani D, Bando H, Komatsu Y, Shinozaki E, Nakajima TE, Satoh T, Nishina T, Esaki T, Wakabayashi M, Nomura S, Takahashi K, Ono H, Hirano N, Fujishiro N, Fuse N, Sato A, Ohtsu A, Yoshino T. Rationale and design of the BRAVERY study (EPOC1701): a multicentre phase II study of eribulin in patients with BRAF V600E mutant metastatic colorectal cancer. ESMO Open 2019; 4:e000590. [PMID: 31798981 PMCID: PMC6863665 DOI: 10.1136/esmoopen-2019-000590] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/06/2019] [Accepted: 09/10/2019] [Indexed: 11/04/2022] Open
Abstract
Background BRAF V600E mutations are associated with aggressive biology and limited response to standard chemotherapy, especially during second-line and beyond therapies. BRAF V600E mutant and wild-type colorectal cancers (CRCs) differ in their expression profiles, and preclinical evidence suggests that microtubule inhibitors have an antitumour effect on xenograft models of BRAF V600E mutant CRCs. Eribulin has the best growth inhibitory activity in vitro of the microtubule inhibitors. Also, we have evidenced a hint of activity for patients with BRAF V600E mutant metastatic CRC (mCRC) with tumour shrinkage following eribulin treatment. Trial design The BRAVERY study is a multicentre phase II study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of eribulin in patients with BRAF V600E mutant mCRC detected in either tumour tissues (primary analysis part) or circulating tumour DNA assays (liquid biopsy part). Key eligibility criteria are refractoriness and intolerance to at least one regimen (including irinotecan or oxaliplatin) containing fluoropyrimidine and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0-1. Eribulin is to be administered intravenously at a dose of 1.4 mg/m2 on days 1 and 8 and repeated every 21 days. The primary endpoint is the confirmed objective response rate (ORR) by investigator's assessment. We calculated the sample size of the primary analysis part at 27 patients using a two-stage design with 25% ORR deemed promising and 5% unacceptable (one-sided α, 0.05; β, 0.1). Secondary endpoints include disease control rate, progression-free survival, overall survival and adverse events. Moreover, we will collect pretreated tissue and serial blood samples for biomarker analyses, focusing on gene expression associated with BRAF mutant-like CRC to find predictive markers and acquired gene alterations to detect resistance mechanisms to eribulin. We initiated patient enrolment in March 2018, completed the primary analysis on May 2019, and are currently continuing with the liquid biopsy part. Trial registration number UMIN000031221 and 000031552.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Toshiki Masuishi
- Department of Clinical Oncology, Aichi Cancer Center Hospital, Nagoya, Japan
| | - Hiroya Taniguchi
- Department of Gastroenterology and Gastrointestinal Oncology, National Cancer Center Hospital East, Kashiwa, Japan
| | - Daisuke Kotani
- Department of Gastroenterology and Gastrointestinal Oncology, National Cancer Center Hospital East, Kashiwa, Japan
| | - Hideaki Bando
- Department of Clinical Oncology, Aichi Cancer Center Hospital, Nagoya, Japan
| | - Yoshito Komatsu
- Department of Cancer Chemotherapy, Hokkaido University Hospital Cancer Center, Sapporo, Japan
| | - Eiji Shinozaki
- Department of Gastrointestinal Chemotherapy, Cancer Institute Hospital of Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Takako Eguchi Nakajima
- Department of Clinical Oncology, St. Marianna University School of Medicine, Kawasaki, Japan
| | - Taroh Satoh
- Frontier Science for Cancer and Chemotherapy, Osaka University, Osaka, Japan
| | - Tomohiro Nishina
- Department of Gastrointestinal Medical Oncology, National Hospital Organization Shikoku Cancer Center, Matsuyama, Japan
| | - Taito Esaki
- Department of Gastrointestinal and Medical Oncology, National Hospital Organization Kyushu Cancer Center, Fukuoka, Japan
| | - Masashi Wakabayashi
- Clinical Research Support Office, National Cancer Center Hospital East, Kashiwa, Japan
| | - Shogo Nomura
- Clinical Research Support Office, National Cancer Center Hospital East, Kashiwa, Japan
| | - Koji Takahashi
- Clinical Research Support Office, National Cancer Center Hospital East, Kashiwa, Japan
| | - Hiromi Ono
- Clinical Research Support Office, National Cancer Center Hospital East, Kashiwa, Japan
| | - Nami Hirano
- Clinical Research Support Office, National Cancer Center Hospital East, Kashiwa, Japan
| | - Noriko Fujishiro
- Clinical Research Support Office, National Cancer Center Hospital East, Kashiwa, Japan
| | - Nozomu Fuse
- Clinical Research Support Office, National Cancer Center Hospital East, Kashiwa, Japan
| | - Akihiro Sato
- Clinical Research Support Office, National Cancer Center Hospital East, Kashiwa, Japan
| | - Atsushi Ohtsu
- Department of Gastroenterology and Gastrointestinal Oncology, National Cancer Center Hospital East, Kashiwa, Japan
| | - Takayuki Yoshino
- Department of Gastroenterology and Gastrointestinal Oncology, National Cancer Center Hospital East, Kashiwa, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Mulero-Sánchez A, Pogacar Z, Vecchione L. Importance of genetic screens in precision oncology. ESMO Open 2019; 4:e000505. [PMID: 31231569 PMCID: PMC6555615 DOI: 10.1136/esmoopen-2019-000505] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/18/2019] [Revised: 04/12/2019] [Accepted: 04/13/2019] [Indexed: 01/05/2023] Open
Abstract
Precision oncology aims to distinguish which patients are eligible for a specific treatment in order to achieve the best possible outcome. In the last few years, genetic screens have shown their potential to find the new targets and drug combinations as well as predictive biomarkers for response and/or resistance to cancer treatment. In this review, we outline how precision oncology is changing over time and describe the different applications of genetic screens. Finally, we present some practical examples that describe the utility and the limitations of genetic screens in precision oncology.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Antonio Mulero-Sánchez
- Division of Molecular Carcinogenesis, Oncode Institute, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Ziva Pogacar
- Division of Molecular Carcinogenesis, Oncode Institute, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Loredana Vecchione
- Charite Comprehensive Cancer Center, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| |
Collapse
|