1
|
Zhao N, Lai C, Wang Y, Dai S, Gu H. Understanding the role of DNA methylation in colorectal cancer: Mechanisms, detection, and clinical significance. Biochim Biophys Acta Rev Cancer 2024; 1879:189096. [PMID: 38499079 DOI: 10.1016/j.bbcan.2024.189096] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/05/2023] [Revised: 02/18/2024] [Accepted: 03/13/2024] [Indexed: 03/20/2024]
Abstract
Colorectal cancer (CRC) is one of the deadliest malignancies worldwide, ranking third in incidence and second in mortality. Remarkably, early stage localized CRC has a 5-year survival rate of over 90%; in stark contrast, the corresponding 5-year survival rate for metastatic CRC (mCRC) is only 14%. Compounding this problem is the staggering lack of effective therapeutic strategies. Beyond genetic mutations, which have been identified as critical instigators of CRC initiation and progression, the importance of epigenetic modifications, particularly DNA methylation (DNAm), cannot be underestimated, given that DNAm can be used for diagnosis, treatment monitoring and prognostic evaluation. This review addresses the intricate mechanisms governing aberrant DNAm in CRC and its profound impact on critical oncogenic pathways. In addition, a comprehensive review of the various techniques used to detect DNAm alterations in CRC is provided, along with an exploration of the clinical utility of cancer-specific DNAm alterations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ningning Zhao
- Anhui Province Key Laboratory of Medical Physics and Technology, Institute of Health and Medical Technology, Hefei Institutes of Physical Science, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Hefei 230031, China; Hefei Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Hefei 230031, China
| | - Chuanxi Lai
- Division of Colorectal Surgery, Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, Zhejiang 310016, China
| | - Yunfei Wang
- Zhejiang ShengTing Biotech. Ltd, Hangzhou 310000, China
| | - Sheng Dai
- Division of Colorectal Surgery, Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, Zhejiang 310016, China.
| | - Hongcang Gu
- Anhui Province Key Laboratory of Medical Physics and Technology, Institute of Health and Medical Technology, Hefei Institutes of Physical Science, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Hefei 230031, China; Hefei Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Hefei 230031, China.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Jensen GL, Pourfarrokh N, Volz M, Morales LL, Walker K, Hammonds KP, El-Ghamry M, Wong L, Hodjat P, Castro E, Rao A, Jhavar SG. Improved Pathologic response to chemoradiation in MGMT methylated locally advanced rectal cancer. Clin Transl Radiat Oncol 2023; 42:100667. [PMID: 37560324 PMCID: PMC10406619 DOI: 10.1016/j.ctro.2023.100667] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/10/2022] [Revised: 06/11/2023] [Accepted: 07/23/2023] [Indexed: 08/11/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE With the growing interest in total neoadjuvant treatment for locally advanced rectal adenocarcinoma (LARC) there is an urgent unmet need to identify predictive markers of response to long-course neoadjuvant concurrent chemoradiotherapy (LCRT). O6-Methylguanine (O6-MG)-DNA-methyltransferase (MGMT) gene methylation has been associated in some malignancies with response to concurrent chemoradiotherapy. We attempted to find if pathologic response to LCRT was associated with MGMT promoter hypermethylation (MGMTh). MATERIALS AND METHODS Patients were identified with LARC, available pre-treatment biopsy specimens, and at least 1 year of follow-up who received LCRT followed by surgical resection within 6 months. Biopsies were tested for MGMTh using a Qiagen pyrosequencing kit (Catalog number 970061). The primary outcome of LCRT responsiveness was based on tumor regression grade (TRG), with grades of 0-1 considered to have excellent response and grades of 2-3 considered to be non-responders. Secondary outcomes included overall survival (OS) and recurrence free survival (RFS). RESULTS Of 96 patients who met inclusion criteria, 76 had samples which produced reliable assay results. MGMTh corresponded with higher grade and age of the biopsy specimen. The percentage of responders to LCRT was higher amongst the MGMTh patients than the MGMTn patients (60.0% vs 27.5%, p value = 0.0061). MGMTh was not significantly associated with improved OS (2-year OS of 96.0% vs 98.0%, p = 0.8102) but there was a trend for improved RFS (2-year RFS of 87.6% vs 74.2%, p = 0.0903). CONCLUSION Significantly greater tumor regression following LCRT was seen in MGMTh LARC. Methylation status may help identify good candidates for close observation without surgery following LCRT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Garrett L. Jensen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, USA
| | - Niloufar Pourfarrokh
- Departments of Pathology, Baylor Scott & White Health, 2401 S. 31 St., Temple, TX 76508, USA
| | - Marcus Volz
- Departments of Pathology, Baylor Scott & White Health, 2401 S. 31 St., Temple, TX 76508, USA
| | - Linden L. Morales
- Departments of Pathology, Baylor Scott & White Health, 2401 S. 31 St., Temple, TX 76508, USA
| | - Kimberly Walker
- Departments of Pathology, Baylor Scott & White Health, 2401 S. 31 St., Temple, TX 76508, USA
| | - Kendall P. Hammonds
- Biostatistics, Baylor Scott & White Health, 2401 S. 31 St., Temple, TX 76508, USA
| | - Moataz El-Ghamry
- Radiation Oncology, Baylor Scott & White Health, 2401 S. 31 St., Temple, TX 76508, USA
| | - Lucas Wong
- Medical Oncology, Baylor Scott & White Health, 2401 S. 31 St., Temple, TX 76508, USA
| | - Parsa Hodjat
- Department of Pathology and Genomic Medicine, Houston Methodist Hospital, Houston TX, USA
| | - Eduardo Castro
- Departments of Pathology, Baylor Scott & White Health, 2401 S. 31 St., Temple, TX 76508, USA
| | - Arundhati Rao
- Departments of Pathology, Baylor Scott & White Health, 2401 S. 31 St., Temple, TX 76508, USA
| | - Sameer G. Jhavar
- Radiation Oncology, Baylor Scott & White Health, 2401 S. 31 St., Temple, TX 76508, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Cecchini M, Zhang JY, Wei W, Sklar J, Lacy J, Zhong M, Kong Y, Zhao H, DiPalermo J, Devine L, Stein SM, Kortmansky J, Johung KL, Bindra RS, LoRusso P, Schalper KA. Quantitative DNA Repair Biomarkers and Immune Profiling for Temozolomide and Olaparib in Metastatic Colorectal Cancer. CANCER RESEARCH COMMUNICATIONS 2023; 3:1132-1139. [PMID: 37387791 PMCID: PMC10305782 DOI: 10.1158/2767-9764.crc-23-0045] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/21/2023] [Revised: 03/28/2023] [Accepted: 05/30/2023] [Indexed: 07/01/2023]
Abstract
Purpose O6-methylguanine DNA methyltransferase (MGMT)-silenced tumors reveal sensitivity to temozolomide (TMZ), which may be enhanced by PARP inhibitors. Approximately 40% of colorectal cancer has MGMT silencing and we aimed to measure antitumoral and immunomodulatory effects from TMZ and olaparib in colorectal cancer. Experimental Design Patients with advanced colorectal cancer were screened for MGMT promoter hypermethylation using methylation-specific PCR of archival tumor. Eligible patients received TMZ 75 mg/m2 days 1-7 with olaparib 150 mg twice daily every 21 days. Pretreatment tumor biopsies were collected for whole-exome sequencing (WES), and multiplex quantitative immunofluorescence (QIF) of MGMT protein expression and immune markers. Results MGMT promoter hypermethylation was detected in 18/51 (35%) patients, 9 received study treatment with no objective responses, 5/9 had stable disease (SD) and 4/9 had progressive disease as best response. Three patients had clinical benefit: carcinoembryonic antigen reduction, radiographic tumor regression, and prolonged SD. MGMT expression by multiplex QIF revealed prominent tumor MGMT protein from 6/9 patients without benefit, while MGMT protein was lower in 3/9 with benefit. Moreover, benefitting patients had higher baseline CD8+ tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes. WES revealed 8/9 patients with MAP kinase variants (7 KRAS and 1 ERBB2). Flow cytometry identified peripheral expansion of effector T cells. Conclusions Our results indicate discordance between MGMT promoter hypermethylation and MGMT protein expression. Antitumor activity seen in patients with low MGMT protein expression, supports MGMT protein as a predictor of alkylator sensitivity. Increased CD8+ TILs and peripheral activated T cells, suggest a role for immunostimulatory combinations. Significance TMZ and PARP inhibitors synergize in vitro and in vivo in tumors with MGMT silencing. Up to 40% of colorectal cancer is MGMT promoter hypermethylated, and we investigated whether TMZ and olaparib are effective in this population. We also measured MGMT by QIF and observed efficacy only in patients with low MGMT, suggesting quantitative MGMT biomarkers more accurately predict benefit to alkylator combinations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael Cecchini
- Department of Internal Medicine (Medical Oncology), Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut
| | - Janie Y. Zhang
- Department of Medicine, Division of Hematology/Oncology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| | - Wei Wei
- Department of Biostatistics, Yale School of Public Health, New Haven, Connecticut
| | - Jeffrey Sklar
- Department of Pathology, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut
| | - Jill Lacy
- Department of Internal Medicine (Medical Oncology), Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut
| | - Minghao Zhong
- Department of Pathology, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut
| | - Yong Kong
- Department of Biostatistics, Yale School of Public Health, New Haven, Connecticut
| | - Hongyu Zhao
- Department of Biostatistics, Yale School of Public Health, New Haven, Connecticut
| | - Jassim DiPalermo
- Department of Pathology, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut
| | - Lesley Devine
- Department of Laboratory Medicine, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut
| | - Stacey M. Stein
- Department of Internal Medicine (Medical Oncology), Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut
| | - Jeremy Kortmansky
- Department of Internal Medicine (Medical Oncology), Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut
| | - Kimberly L. Johung
- Department of Therapeutic Radiology, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut
| | - Ranjit S. Bindra
- Department of Therapeutic Radiology, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut
| | - Patricia LoRusso
- Department of Internal Medicine (Medical Oncology), Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut
| | - Kurt A. Schalper
- Department of Pathology, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Jensen LH, Rogatto SR, Lindebjerg J, Havelund B, Abildgaard C, do Canto LM, Vagn-Hansen C, Dam C, Rafaelsen S, Hansen TF. Precision medicine applied to metastatic colorectal cancer using tumor-derived organoids and in-vitro sensitivity testing: a phase 2, single-center, open-label, and non-comparative study. J Exp Clin Cancer Res 2023; 42:115. [PMID: 37143108 PMCID: PMC10161587 DOI: 10.1186/s13046-023-02683-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/01/2023] [Accepted: 04/24/2023] [Indexed: 05/06/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Patients with colorectal metastatic disease have a poor prognosis, limited therapeutic options, and frequent development of resistance. Strategies based on tumor-derived organoids are a powerful tool to assess drug sensitivity at an individual level and to suggest new treatment options or re-challenge. Here, we evaluated the method's feasibility and clinical outcome as applied to patients with no satisfactory treatment options. METHODS In this phase 2, single-center, open-label, non-comparative study (ClinicalTrials.gov, register NCT03251612), we enrolled 90 patients with metastatic colorectal cancer following progression on or after standard therapy. Participants were 18 years or older with an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0-2, adequate organ function, and metastasis available for biopsy. Biopsies from the metastatic site were cultured using organoids model. Sensitivity testing was performed with a panel of drugs with proven activity in phase II or III trials. At the discretion of the investigator considering toxicity, the drug with the highest relative activity was offered. The primary endpoint was the proportion of patients alive without disease progression at two months per local assessment. RESULTS Biopsies available from 82 to 90 patients were processed for cell culture, of which 44 successfully generated organoids with at least one treatment suggested. The precision cohort of 34 patients started treatment and the primary endpoint, progression-free survival (PFS) at two months was met in 17 patients (50%, 95% CI 32-68), exceeding the pre-defined level (14 of 45; 31%). The median PFS was 67 days (95% CI 51-108), and the median overall survival was 189 days (95% CI 103-277). CONCLUSIONS Patient-derived organoids and in-vitro sensitivity testing were feasible in a cohort of metastatic colorectal cancer. The primary endpoint was met, as half of the patients were without progression at two months. Cancer patients may benefit from functional testing using tumor-derived organoids. TRIAL REGISTRATION ClinicalTrials.gov, register NCT03251612.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lars Henrik Jensen
- Department of Oncology, University Hospital of Southern Denmark, Lillebaelt Hospital, Beriderbakken 4, Vejle, 7100, Denmark.
- Danish Colorectal Cancer Center South, University Hospital of Southern Denmark, Vejle, Denmark.
- Institute of Regional Health Research, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark.
| | - Silvia Regina Rogatto
- Danish Colorectal Cancer Center South, University Hospital of Southern Denmark, Vejle, Denmark
- Institute of Regional Health Research, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark
- Clinical Genetics Department, University Hospital of Southern Denmark, Lillebaelt Hospital, Vejle, Denmark
| | - Jan Lindebjerg
- Danish Colorectal Cancer Center South, University Hospital of Southern Denmark, Vejle, Denmark
- Department of Pathology, University Hospital of Southern Denmark, Lillebalt Hospital, Vejle, Denmark
| | - Birgitte Havelund
- Department of Oncology, University Hospital of Southern Denmark, Lillebaelt Hospital, Beriderbakken 4, Vejle, 7100, Denmark
- Danish Colorectal Cancer Center South, University Hospital of Southern Denmark, Vejle, Denmark
| | - Cecilie Abildgaard
- Clinical Genetics Department, University Hospital of Southern Denmark, Lillebaelt Hospital, Vejle, Denmark
| | - Luisa Matos do Canto
- Clinical Genetics Department, University Hospital of Southern Denmark, Lillebaelt Hospital, Vejle, Denmark
| | - Chris Vagn-Hansen
- Department of Pathology, University Hospital of Southern Denmark, Lillebalt Hospital, Vejle, Denmark
| | - Claus Dam
- Department of Pathology, University Hospital of Southern Denmark, Lillebalt Hospital, Vejle, Denmark
| | - Søren Rafaelsen
- Danish Colorectal Cancer Center South, University Hospital of Southern Denmark, Vejle, Denmark
- Institute of Regional Health Research, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark
- Department of Radiology, University Hospital of Southern Denmark, Lillebalt Hospital, Vejle, Denmark
| | - Torben Frøstrup Hansen
- Department of Oncology, University Hospital of Southern Denmark, Lillebaelt Hospital, Beriderbakken 4, Vejle, 7100, Denmark
- Danish Colorectal Cancer Center South, University Hospital of Southern Denmark, Vejle, Denmark
- Institute of Regional Health Research, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Ban X, Mo S, Lu Z, Jia C, Shao H, Chang X, Mao X, Zhang Y, Pang J, Zhang Y, Yu S, Chen J. Expression and methylation status of MMR and MGMT in well-differentiated pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors and potential clinical applications. Endocrine 2022; 77:538-545. [PMID: 35708896 DOI: 10.1007/s12020-022-03102-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/17/2022] [Accepted: 05/27/2022] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Recent studies claim that immune checkpoint inhibitors are effective in defective mismatch repair (dMMR) cancers. This raises the question of whether similar therapies are effective in PanNETs (pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors); however, in general, assessment of MMR status in PanNETs has been inconsistent in previous studies. MGMT (O6-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase) is potentially important for guiding temozolomide (TMZ) therapy in glioblastoma. The number of reports on MGMT expression and promoter methylation in PanNETs are limited. METHODS In this study we assessed the expression of MGMT and MMR proteins MSH2, MSH6, MLH1 and PMS2 in a series of PanNETs by IHC. The methylation status of MGMT and MMR genes in a subset of PanNETs was further assessed by MS-MLPA analysis. Survival curves were constructed using the Kaplan-Meier method, and differences were assessed using the log-rank test. Multivariate Cox proportional hazards regression models were used to determine the prognostic value of the variables. RESULTS According to evaluation criteria for mismatch repair defects, none of PanNETs shown nuclear staining loss for MSH2, MSH6, MLH1, and PMS2. MGMT low-intensity PanNETs were more commonly found in higher grade, higher Ki67 index and non-functional tumors (P < 0.05). In multivariate analysis, stage III-IV and low-intensity MGMT were shown to be independent risk factors for progression of PanNETs in the entire cohort, non-functioning subgroup and G2 subgroup (P < 0.05 for all). MGMT promoter methylation tended to be higher in the group with low expression of MGMT, However, methylation of MGMT did not statistically correlate with low expression of MGMT (P = 0.153). CONCLUSIONS In conclusion, our study suggests that decreased expression of MGMT but not MMR is associated with a higher risk of progression of pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xinchao Ban
- Department of Pathology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
- Department of Pathology, Tianjin Medical University, Tianjin, China
- Department of Pathology, Tianjin Medical University General Hospital, Tianjin, China
| | - Shengwei Mo
- Department of Pathology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Zhaohui Lu
- Department of Pathology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Congwei Jia
- Department of Pathology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Huilin Shao
- Department of Pathology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Xiaoyan Chang
- Department of Pathology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Xinxin Mao
- Department of Pathology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Yue Zhang
- Department of Pathology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Junyi Pang
- Department of Pathology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Yuhan Zhang
- Department of Pathology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Shuangni Yu
- Department of Pathology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China.
| | - Jie Chen
- Department of Pathology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China.
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Crisafulli G, Sartore-Bianchi A, Lazzari L, Pietrantonio F, Amatu A, Macagno M, Barault L, Cassingena A, Bartolini A, Luraghi P, Mauri G, Battuello P, Personeni N, Zampino MG, Pessei V, Vitiello PP, Tosi F, Idotta L, Morano F, Valtorta E, Bonoldi E, Germano G, Di Nicolantonio F, Marsoni S, Siena S, Bardelli A. Temozolomide Treatment Alters Mismatch Repair and Boosts Mutational Burden in Tumor and Blood of Colorectal Cancer Patients. Cancer Discov 2022; 12:1656-1675. [PMID: 35522273 PMCID: PMC9394384 DOI: 10.1158/2159-8290.cd-21-1434] [Citation(s) in RCA: 49] [Impact Index Per Article: 24.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/01/2021] [Revised: 04/16/2022] [Accepted: 05/04/2022] [Indexed: 01/07/2023]
Abstract
The majority of metastatic colorectal cancers (mCRC) are mismatch repair (MMR) proficient and unresponsive to immunotherapy, whereas MMR-deficient (MMRd) tumors often respond to immune-checkpoint blockade. We previously reported that the treatment of colorectal cancer preclinical models with temozolomide (TMZ) leads to MMR deficiency, increased tumor mutational burden (TMB), and sensitization to immunotherapy. To clinically translate these findings, we designed the ARETHUSA clinical trial whereby O6-methylguanine-DNA-methyltransferase (MGMT)-deficient, MMR-proficient, RAS-mutant mCRC patients received priming therapy with TMZ. Analysis of tissue biopsies and circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) revealed the emergence of a distinct mutational signature and increased TMB after TMZ treatment. Multiple alterations in the nucleotide context favored by the TMZ signature emerged in MMR genes, and the p.T1219I MSH6 variant was detected in ctDNA and tissue of 94% (16/17) of the cases. A subset of patients whose tumors displayed the MSH6 mutation, the TMZ mutational signature, and increased TMB achieved disease stabilization upon pembrolizumab treatment. SIGNIFICANCE MMR-proficient mCRCs are unresponsive to immunotherapy. We provide the proof of concept that inactivation of MMR genes can be achieved pharmacologically with TMZ and molecularly monitored in the tissue and blood of patients with mCRC. This strategy deserves additional evaluation in mCRC patients whose tumors are no longer responsive to standard-of-care treatments. See related commentary by Willis and Overman, p. 1612. This article is highlighted in the In This Issue feature, p. 1599.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Giovanni Crisafulli
- Department of Oncology, University of Torino, Candiolo, Italy.,Candiolo Cancer Institute, FPO - IRCCS, Candiolo, Italy
| | - Andrea Sartore-Bianchi
- Niguarda Cancer Center, Grande Ospedale Metropolitano Niguarda, Milan, Italy.,Department of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, Università degli Studi di Milano, Milan, Italy
| | - Luca Lazzari
- The FIRC Institute of Molecular Oncology, Milan, Italy
| | - Filippo Pietrantonio
- Department of Medical Oncology, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy
| | - Alessio Amatu
- Niguarda Cancer Center, Grande Ospedale Metropolitano Niguarda, Milan, Italy
| | - Marco Macagno
- Candiolo Cancer Institute, FPO - IRCCS, Candiolo, Italy
| | - Ludovic Barault
- Department of Oncology, University of Torino, Candiolo, Italy.,Candiolo Cancer Institute, FPO - IRCCS, Candiolo, Italy
| | - Andrea Cassingena
- Niguarda Cancer Center, Grande Ospedale Metropolitano Niguarda, Milan, Italy
| | | | - Paolo Luraghi
- The FIRC Institute of Molecular Oncology, Milan, Italy
| | - Gianluca Mauri
- Department of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, Università degli Studi di Milano, Milan, Italy.,The FIRC Institute of Molecular Oncology, Milan, Italy
| | - Paolo Battuello
- Department of Oncology, University of Torino, Candiolo, Italy
| | - Nicola Personeni
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Pieve Emanuele, Milan, Italy.,Medical Oncology and Hematology Unit, Humanitas Cancer Center, IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Rozzano, Milan, Italy
| | - Maria Giulia Zampino
- Division of Gastrointestinal Medical Oncology and Neuroendocrine Tumors, European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | | | - Pietro Paolo Vitiello
- Department of Oncology, University of Torino, Candiolo, Italy.,Candiolo Cancer Institute, FPO - IRCCS, Candiolo, Italy
| | - Federica Tosi
- Niguarda Cancer Center, Grande Ospedale Metropolitano Niguarda, Milan, Italy
| | - Laura Idotta
- Niguarda Cancer Center, Grande Ospedale Metropolitano Niguarda, Milan, Italy
| | - Federica Morano
- Department of Medical Oncology, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy
| | - Emanuele Valtorta
- Niguarda Cancer Center, Grande Ospedale Metropolitano Niguarda, Milan, Italy
| | - Emanuela Bonoldi
- Niguarda Cancer Center, Grande Ospedale Metropolitano Niguarda, Milan, Italy
| | - Giovanni Germano
- Department of Oncology, University of Torino, Candiolo, Italy.,Candiolo Cancer Institute, FPO - IRCCS, Candiolo, Italy
| | - Federica Di Nicolantonio
- Department of Oncology, University of Torino, Candiolo, Italy.,Candiolo Cancer Institute, FPO - IRCCS, Candiolo, Italy
| | | | - Salvatore Siena
- Niguarda Cancer Center, Grande Ospedale Metropolitano Niguarda, Milan, Italy.,Department of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, Università degli Studi di Milano, Milan, Italy
| | - Alberto Bardelli
- Department of Oncology, University of Torino, Candiolo, Italy.,Candiolo Cancer Institute, FPO - IRCCS, Candiolo, Italy.,Corresponding Author: Alberto Bardelli, University of Turin, Department of Oncology, Candiolo Cancer Institute, FPO - IRCCS, Str.Prov.le 142, km 3.95, 10060, Candiolo, Torino, Italy. Phone/Fax: 39-011-993-3235; E-mail:
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Niger M, Nichetti F, Casadei-Gardini A, Morano F, Pircher C, Tamborini E, Perrone F, Canale M, Lipka DB, Vingiani A, Agnelli L, Dobberkau A, Hüllein J, Korell F, Heilig CE, Pusceddu S, Corti F, Droz M, Ulivi P, Prisciandaro M, Antista M, Bini M, Cattaneo L, Milione M, Glimm H, Köhler BC, Pruneri G, Hübschmann D, Fröhling S, Mazzaferro V, Pietrantonio F, Di Bartolomeo M, de Braud F. MGMT inactivation as a new biomarker in patients with advanced biliary tract cancers. Mol Oncol 2022; 16:2733-2746. [PMID: 35621918 PMCID: PMC9297767 DOI: 10.1002/1878-0261.13256] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/31/2022] [Revised: 05/09/2022] [Accepted: 05/25/2022] [Indexed: 11/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Biliary tract cancers (BTCs) have poor prognosis and limited therapeutic options. The impact of O6 -methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase (MGMT) inactivation in advanced BTC patients is not established. We investigated the prevalence, prognostic and predictive impact of MGMT inactivation in two multicenter cohorts. MGMT inactivation was assessed through PCR and immunohistochemistry (IHC) in an Italian cohort; the results were then externally validated using RNA sequencing (RNA-seq) data from the BTC subcohort of the MASTER (Molecularly Aided Stratification for Tumor Eradication Research) precision oncology program of the National Center for Tumor Diseases Heidelberg and the German Cancer Consortium. Among 164 Italian cases, 18% presented MGMT promoter hypermethylation (>14%) and 73% had negative MGMT protein expression. Both were associated with worse overall survival (OS) (HR 2.31; p<.001 and HR 1.99, p=0.012, respectively). In the MASTER cohort, patients with lower MGMT mRNA expression showed significantly poorer OS (mOS 20.4 vs 31.7 months, unadjusted HR 1.89; p=0.043). Our results suggest that MGMT inactivation is a frequent epigenetic alteration in BTC, with a significant prognostic impact, and provide the rationale to explore DNA-damaging agents in MGMT-inactivated BTCs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Monica Niger
- Medical Oncology Department, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori di Milano, Milan, Italy
| | - Federico Nichetti
- Medical Oncology Department, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori di Milano, Milan, Italy.,Computational Oncology Group, Molecular Precision Oncology Program, National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT) and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Im Neuenheimer Feld 280, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Andrea Casadei-Gardini
- Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy.,Department of Medical Oncology, San Raffaele Scientific Institute IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Federica Morano
- Medical Oncology Department, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori di Milano, Milan, Italy
| | - Chiara Pircher
- Medical Oncology Department, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori di Milano, Milan, Italy
| | - Elena Tamborini
- Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori di Milano, Milan, Italy
| | - Federica Perrone
- Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori di Milano, Milan, Italy
| | - Matteo Canale
- Biosciences Laboratory, IRCCS Istituto Romagnolo per lo Studio dei Tumori "Dino Amadori" (IRST), 47014, Meldola, Italy
| | - Daniel B Lipka
- Section Translational Cancer Epigenomics, Division of Translational Medical Oncology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ) & National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT) Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.,German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Heidelberg and partner sites
| | - Andrea Vingiani
- Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori di Milano, Milan, Italy
| | - Luca Agnelli
- Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori di Milano, Milan, Italy
| | - Anna Dobberkau
- Section Translational Cancer Epigenomics, Division of Translational Medical Oncology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ) & National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT) Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.,German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Heidelberg and partner sites
| | - Jennifer Hüllein
- Computational Oncology Group, Molecular Precision Oncology Program, National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT) and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Im Neuenheimer Feld 280, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Felix Korell
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Heidelberg and partner sites.,Department of Hematology & Oncology, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Christoph E Heilig
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Heidelberg and partner sites.,Division of Translational Medical Oncology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ) & National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT) Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Sara Pusceddu
- Medical Oncology Department, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori di Milano, Milan, Italy
| | - Francesca Corti
- Medical Oncology Department, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori di Milano, Milan, Italy
| | - Michele Droz
- Department of Surgery, Division of HPB, General Surgery and Liver Transplantation, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale Tumori di Milano, Milan, Italy
| | - Paola Ulivi
- Biosciences Laboratory, IRCCS Istituto Romagnolo per lo Studio dei Tumori "Dino Amadori" (IRST), 47014, Meldola, Italy
| | - Michele Prisciandaro
- Medical Oncology Department, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori di Milano, Milan, Italy.,Department of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| | - Maria Antista
- Medical Oncology Department, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori di Milano, Milan, Italy
| | - Marta Bini
- Medical Oncology Department, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori di Milano, Milan, Italy
| | - Laura Cattaneo
- Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori di Milano, Milan, Italy
| | - Massimo Milione
- Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori di Milano, Milan, Italy
| | - Hanno Glimm
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Heidelberg and partner sites.,Department of Translational Medical Oncology, National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT) Dresden and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Dresden, Germany.,Center for Personalized Oncology, National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT) Dresden and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus Dresden at TU Dresden, Dresden, Germany
| | - Bruno C Köhler
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Heidelberg and partner sites.,Department of Medical Oncology, National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT) Heidelberg, University Hospital Heidelberg.,Liver Cancer Center Heidelberg, University Hospital Heidelberg, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Giancarlo Pruneri
- Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori di Milano, Milan, Italy
| | - Daniel Hübschmann
- Computational Oncology Group, Molecular Precision Oncology Program, National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT) and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Im Neuenheimer Feld 280, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany.,German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Heidelberg and partner sites.,Heidelberg Institute for Stem Cell Technology and Experimental Medicine, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Stefan Fröhling
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Heidelberg and partner sites
| | - Vincenzo Mazzaferro
- Department of Surgery, Division of HPB, General Surgery and Liver Transplantation, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale Tumori di Milano, Milan, Italy.,Department of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| | - Filippo Pietrantonio
- Medical Oncology Department, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori di Milano, Milan, Italy
| | - Maria Di Bartolomeo
- Medical Oncology Department, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori di Milano, Milan, Italy
| | - Filippo de Braud
- Medical Oncology Department, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori di Milano, Milan, Italy.,Department of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Rossini D, Germani MM, Lonardi S, Pietrantonio F, Dell'Aquila E, Borelli B, Allegrini G, Maddalena G, Randon G, Marmorino F, Zaniboni A, Buonadonna A, Boccaccino A, Conca V, Antoniotti C, Passardi A, Masi G, Cremolini C. Treatments after second progression in metastatic colorectal cancer: A pooled analysis of the TRIBE and TRIBE2 studies. Eur J Cancer 2022; 170:64-72. [PMID: 35594613 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2022.04.019] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/11/2022] [Revised: 04/11/2022] [Accepted: 04/16/2022] [Indexed: 12/31/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The availability of new drugs in the chemo-refractory setting opened the way to the concepts of treatment sequencing in mCRC. However, the impact of later line options in the therapeutic route of metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) patients and the attrition rate across subsequent lines of therapy are not well established. METHODS We performed a pooled analysis of treatments administered after the 2nd disease progression in 1187 mCRC patients enrolled in the randomized phase III TRIBE and TRIBE2 studies, where upfront FOLFOXIRI/bev was compared with FOLFOX or FOLFIRI/bev. Per each line, we assessed the attrition rate, treatment choices and clinical outcomes. RESULTS 625 (53%), 326 (27%) and 136 (11%) patients received a systemic treatment after the 2nd, 3rd and 4th disease progression, respectively. PFS and objective response rate decreased along each line. RAS/BRAF wild-type patients received more likely a 3rd line (75%) compared with RAS (66%, p = 0.005) and BRAF (66%, p = 0.11) mutants. In 3rd line, 67% of RAS/BRAF wild-type patients received anti-EGFRs, achieving longer PFS with respect to other therapies (6.4 vs 3.9 months, p = 0.02). A trend towards longer 3rd line OS was observed in TRIBE patients (9.9 vs 7.2 months, p = 0.05). CONCLUSIONS A relevant attrition rate across subsequent lines of therapy is evident, and more pronounced in RAS and BRAF mutated patients, thus highlighting the relevance of the choice of the upfront treatment. The efficacy of anti-EGFR agents among RAS/BRAF wild-type patients unexposed to anti-EGFRs is higher than other options. The reintroduction of chemotherapy remains frequent in clinical practice. TRIAL REGISTRATION Clinicaltrials. gov Identifiers NCT00719797, NCT02339116.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daniele Rossini
- Department of Translational Research and New Technologies in Medicine, University of Pisa, Via Roma 67, 56127, Pisa, Italy; Unit of Medical Oncology 2, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Pisana, Via Roma 67, 56127, Pisa, Italy
| | - Marco M Germani
- Department of Translational Research and New Technologies in Medicine, University of Pisa, Via Roma 67, 56127, Pisa, Italy; Unit of Medical Oncology 2, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Pisana, Via Roma 67, 56127, Pisa, Italy
| | - Sara Lonardi
- Medical Oncology Unit 3, Veneto Institute of Oncology IOV - IRCCS, Via Gattamelata, 64, 35128, Padua, Italy
| | - Filippo Pietrantonio
- Department of Medical Oncology, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale Dei Tumori, Via Giacomo Venezian, 1, 20133, Milan, Italy
| | - Emanuela Dell'Aquila
- Department of Medical Oncology, University Campus Biomedico, Via Álvaro Del Portillo, 21, 00128, Rome, Italy; Medical Oncology 1, IRCCS Regina Elena National Cancer Institute, Via Elio Chianesi, 53, 0144, Rome, Italy
| | - Beatrice Borelli
- Department of Translational Research and New Technologies in Medicine, University of Pisa, Via Roma 67, 56127, Pisa, Italy; Unit of Medical Oncology 2, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Pisana, Via Roma 67, 56127, Pisa, Italy
| | - Giacomo Allegrini
- Department of Oncology, Division of Medical Oncology, Azienda Toscana Nord Ovest, Viale Vittorio Alfieri, 36, 57124, Livorno, Italy
| | - Giulia Maddalena
- Medical Oncology Unit 3, Veneto Institute of Oncology IOV - IRCCS, Via Gattamelata, 64, 35128, Padua, Italy; Department of Surgery, Oncology and Gastroenterology, University of Padua, Padua, Italy
| | - Giovanni Randon
- Department of Medical Oncology, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale Dei Tumori, Via Giacomo Venezian, 1, 20133, Milan, Italy
| | - Federica Marmorino
- Department of Translational Research and New Technologies in Medicine, University of Pisa, Via Roma 67, 56127, Pisa, Italy; Unit of Medical Oncology 2, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Pisana, Via Roma 67, 56127, Pisa, Italy
| | - Alberto Zaniboni
- Medical Oncology Unit, Poliambulanza Foundation, Via Bissolati, 57, 25124, Brescia, Italy
| | - Angela Buonadonna
- Medical Oncology Unit, Centro di Riferimento Oncologico di Aviano, Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico, Via Franco Gallini, 2, 33081, Aviano, Italy
| | - Alessandra Boccaccino
- Department of Translational Research and New Technologies in Medicine, University of Pisa, Via Roma 67, 56127, Pisa, Italy; Unit of Medical Oncology 2, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Pisana, Via Roma 67, 56127, Pisa, Italy
| | - Veronica Conca
- Department of Translational Research and New Technologies in Medicine, University of Pisa, Via Roma 67, 56127, Pisa, Italy; Unit of Medical Oncology 2, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Pisana, Via Roma 67, 56127, Pisa, Italy
| | - Carlotta Antoniotti
- Department of Translational Research and New Technologies in Medicine, University of Pisa, Via Roma 67, 56127, Pisa, Italy; Unit of Medical Oncology 2, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Pisana, Via Roma 67, 56127, Pisa, Italy
| | - Alessandro Passardi
- Department of Medical Oncology, IRCCS Istituto Romagnolo per Lo Studio Dei Tumori (IRST) "Dino Amadori", Via Piero Maroncelli, 40, 47014, Meldola, Italy
| | - Gianluca Masi
- Department of Translational Research and New Technologies in Medicine, University of Pisa, Via Roma 67, 56127, Pisa, Italy; Unit of Medical Oncology 2, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Pisana, Via Roma 67, 56127, Pisa, Italy
| | - Chiara Cremolini
- Department of Translational Research and New Technologies in Medicine, University of Pisa, Via Roma 67, 56127, Pisa, Italy; Unit of Medical Oncology 2, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Pisana, Via Roma 67, 56127, Pisa, Italy.
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Huyghe N, Benidovskaya E, Stevens P, Van den Eynde M. Biomarkers of Response and Resistance to Immunotherapy in Microsatellite Stable Colorectal Cancer: Toward a New Personalized Medicine. Cancers (Basel) 2022; 14:2241. [PMID: 35565369 PMCID: PMC9105843 DOI: 10.3390/cancers14092241] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/08/2022] [Revised: 04/25/2022] [Accepted: 04/27/2022] [Indexed: 11/28/2022] Open
Abstract
Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors (ICIs) are well recognized as a major immune treatment modality for multiple types of solid cancers. However, for colorectal cancer (CRC), ICIs are only approved for the treatment of Mismatch-Repair-Deficient and Microsatellite Instability-High (dMMR/MSI-H) tumors. For the vast majority of CRC, that are not dMMR/MSI-H, ICIs alone provide limited to no clinical benefit. This discrepancy of response between CRC and other solid cancers suggests that CRC may be inherently resistant to ICIs alone. In translational research, efforts are underway to thoroughly characterize the immune microenvironment of CRC to better understand the mechanisms behind this resistance and to find new biomarkers of response. In the clinic, trials are being set up to study biomarkers along with treatments targeting newly discovered immune checkpoint molecules or treatments combining ICIs with other existing therapies to improve response in MSS CRC. In this review, we will focus on the characteristics of response and resistance to ICIs in CRC, and discuss promising biomarkers studied in recent clinical trials combining ICIs with other therapies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nicolas Huyghe
- Institut de Recherche Clinique et Expérimentale (Pole MIRO), UCLouvain, 1200 Brussels, Belgium; (N.H.); (E.B.); (P.S.)
| | - Elena Benidovskaya
- Institut de Recherche Clinique et Expérimentale (Pole MIRO), UCLouvain, 1200 Brussels, Belgium; (N.H.); (E.B.); (P.S.)
| | - Philippe Stevens
- Institut de Recherche Clinique et Expérimentale (Pole MIRO), UCLouvain, 1200 Brussels, Belgium; (N.H.); (E.B.); (P.S.)
| | - Marc Van den Eynde
- Institut de Recherche Clinique et Expérimentale (Pole MIRO), UCLouvain, 1200 Brussels, Belgium; (N.H.); (E.B.); (P.S.)
- Institut Roi Albert II, Department of Medical Oncology and Gastroenterology, Cliniques Universitaires St-Luc, 1200 Brussels, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Morano F, Raimondi A, Pagani F, Lonardi S, Salvatore L, Cremolini C, Murgioni S, Randon G, Palermo F, Antonuzzo L, Pella N, Racca P, Prisciandaro M, Niger M, Corti F, Bergamo F, Zaniboni A, Ratti M, Palazzo M, Cagnazzo C, Calegari MA, Marmorino F, Capone I, Conca E, Busico A, Brich S, Tamborini E, Perrone F, Di Maio M, Milione M, Di Bartolomeo M, de Braud F, Pietrantonio F. Temozolomide Followed by Combination With Low-Dose Ipilimumab and Nivolumab in Patients With Microsatellite-Stable, O 6-Methylguanine-DNA Methyltransferase-Silenced Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: The MAYA Trial. J Clin Oncol 2022; 40:1562-1573. [PMID: 35258987 PMCID: PMC9084437 DOI: 10.1200/jco.21.02583] [Citation(s) in RCA: 52] [Impact Index Per Article: 26.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
This is a multicenter, single-arm phase II trial evaluating the efficacy and safety of an immune-sensitizing strategy with temozolomide priming followed by a combination of low-dose ipilimumab and nivolumab in patients with microsatellite-stable (MSS) and O6-methylguanine–DNA methyltransferase (MGMT)–silenced metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). MAYA shows that temozolomide priming followed by Ipi/Nivo combo induces durable benefit in MSS/MGMT-silenced mCRC.![]()
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Federica Morano
- Department of Medical Oncology, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy
| | - Alessandra Raimondi
- Department of Medical Oncology, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy
| | - Filippo Pagani
- Department of Medical Oncology, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy
| | - Sara Lonardi
- Medical Oncology 3, Istituto Oncologico Veneto IOV-IRCSS, Padua, Italy
| | - Lisa Salvatore
- Comprehensive Cancer Center, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy.,Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy
| | - Chiara Cremolini
- Unit of Medical Oncology 2, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Pisana, Pisa, Italy.,Department of Translational Research and New Technology in Medicine and Surgery, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy
| | - Sabina Murgioni
- Medical Oncology 1, Istituto Oncologico Veneto IOV-IRCSS, Padua, Italy
| | - Giovanni Randon
- Department of Medical Oncology, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy
| | - Federica Palermo
- Department of Medical Oncology, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy
| | - Lorenzo Antonuzzo
- Clinical Oncology Unit, Careggi University Hospital, Florence, Italy.,Department of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, University of Florence, Florence, Italy
| | - Nicoletta Pella
- Department of Oncology, ASUFC University Hospital of Udine, Udine, Italy
| | - Patrizia Racca
- ColoRectal Cancer Unit, Department of Oncology, AOU Città della Salute e della Scienza di Torino, Turin, Italy
| | - Michele Prisciandaro
- Department of Medical Oncology, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy
| | - Monica Niger
- Department of Medical Oncology, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy
| | - Francesca Corti
- Department of Medical Oncology, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy
| | - Francesca Bergamo
- Medical Oncology 1, Istituto Oncologico Veneto IOV-IRCSS, Padua, Italy
| | | | - Margherita Ratti
- Department of Medical Oncology, Azienda Socio Sanitaria Territoriale of Cremona, Cremona, Italy
| | - Michele Palazzo
- Department of Medical Oncology, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy
| | - Celeste Cagnazzo
- Department of Public Health and Pediatric Sciences, University of Turin, Turin, Italy
| | - Maria Alessandra Calegari
- Comprehensive Cancer Center, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - Federica Marmorino
- Unit of Medical Oncology 2, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Pisana, Pisa, Italy.,Department of Translational Research and New Technology in Medicine and Surgery, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy
| | - Iolanda Capone
- Department of the Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori di Milano, Milan, Italy
| | - Elena Conca
- Department of the Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori di Milano, Milan, Italy
| | - Adele Busico
- Department of the Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori di Milano, Milan, Italy
| | - Silvia Brich
- Department of the Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori di Milano, Milan, Italy
| | - Elena Tamborini
- Department of the Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori di Milano, Milan, Italy
| | - Federica Perrone
- Department of the Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori di Milano, Milan, Italy
| | - Massimo Di Maio
- Department of Oncology, University of Turin, Division of Medical Oncology, Ordine Mauriziano Hospital, Turin, Italy
| | - Massimo Milione
- Department of the Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori di Milano, Milan, Italy
| | - Maria Di Bartolomeo
- Department of Medical Oncology, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy
| | - Filippo de Braud
- Department of Medical Oncology, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy
| | - Filippo Pietrantonio
- Department of Medical Oncology, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Germani MM, Moretto R. Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors in Mismatch Repair Proficient/Microsatellite Stable Metastatic Colorectal Cancer Patients: Insights from the AtezoTRIBE and MAYA Trials. Cancers (Basel) 2021; 14:cancers14010052. [PMID: 35008215 PMCID: PMC8750658 DOI: 10.3390/cancers14010052] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/30/2021] [Revised: 12/16/2021] [Accepted: 12/21/2021] [Indexed: 12/21/2022] Open
Abstract
Simple Summary Immune-checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) show modest activity and efficacy in microsatellite stable (MSS) metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) patients harbouring a proficient mismatch repair system (pMMR). Recently, two phase 2 trials -AtezoTRIBE and MAYA- have challenged this dogma through the administration of an intense first-line chemotherapy backbone consisting of FOLFOXIRI/bevacizumab in patients unselected for their microsatellite status, and immune priming with temozolomide in chemorefractory pMMR/MSS patients with silencing of O6-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase (MGMT), respectively, reporting promising results. We here present the founding biological rationale of these two studies and their main findings. At the same time, we stress their strengths and drawbacks and open questions still to be address in future clinical investigations. Abstract In metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC), remarkable advances have been achieved with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) targeting PD-1/PD-L1 and CTLA-4, only in a small subset of tumours (4–5%), harbouring a deficient mismatch repair system (dMMR)/microsatellite instability–high (MSI-H) or mutations in the catalytic subunit of polymerase epsilon (POLE). Within this framework, several combination strategies have been investigated to sensitize proficient mismatch repair (pMMR)/microsatellite stable (MSS) mCRC to ICIs, with disappointing results so far. However, at the last ESMO meeting, two phase II trials AtezoTRIBE and MAYA provided promising results in this field. In the comparative AtezoTRIBE trial, the addition of atezolizumab to FOLFOXIRI (5-fluoruracil, oxaliplatin and irinotecan) and bevacizumab led to a significant advantage in terms of progression free survival (PFS) in a population of untreated mCRC patients, not selected according to MMR/MSI status. In the single-arm MAYA trial, immune priming with temozolomide in pMMR/MSS chemo-resistant mCRC patients with silencing of O6-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase (MGMT) allowed reporting signals of sensitivity to the subsequent therapy with nivolumab and a low dose of ipilimumab in some patients. Here, we discuss the rationale, results, criticisms and research perspectives opened by these two studies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marco Maria Germani
- Unit of Medical Oncology 2, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Pisana, Via Roma, 67, 56126 Pisa, Italy;
- Department of Translational Research and New Technologies in Medicine and Surgery, University of Pisa, 56126 Pisa, Italy
| | - Roberto Moretto
- Unit of Medical Oncology 2, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Pisana, Via Roma, 67, 56126 Pisa, Italy;
- Correspondence: ; Tel.: +39-05-0992852; Fax: +39-05-0992069
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Choi MK, Cha Y, Baek JY. Retreatment of Irinotecan in Later Lines of Therapy for Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: A Retrospective Study. Oncology 2021; 99:665-672. [PMID: 34515197 DOI: 10.1159/000518041] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/26/2021] [Accepted: 06/22/2021] [Indexed: 11/19/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Due to few efficacious options in later lines of therapy in metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC), there has been considerable interest in the possibility of retreatment with previously administered agents. This study investigated the efficacy and safety of irinotecan retreatment (IRI2) in patients with refractory mCRC. METHODS We performed a retrospective analysis of patients with mCRC who were retreated with irinotecan-based regimens. The retreatment regimens with anti-epidermal growth factor receptor therapies were excluded. RESULTS A total of 64 patients were included. Patients had a median age of 56 years and were offered mainly in the setting of third- or fourth-line therapy with IRI2. The disease control rate was 78.2% including an objective response of 23.5%. Median progression-free survival and overall survival were 5.5 and 19.3 months, respectively. The most frequent grade 3 or higher toxicities were nausea/vomiting (27.9%) and neutropenia (25%). CONCLUSION IRI2 might be a reasonable option for heavily pretreated patients with mCRC who achieved disease control with prior irinotecan therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Moon Ki Choi
- Center for Colorectal Cancer, National Cancer Center, Goyang, Republic of Korea
| | - Yongjun Cha
- Center for Colorectal Cancer, National Cancer Center, Goyang, Republic of Korea
| | - Ji Yeon Baek
- Center for Colorectal Cancer, National Cancer Center, Goyang, Republic of Korea
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Ahmed M, Bayoumi B, Abdallah S, Elserafy M. MGMT Immunohistochemical Expression in Colorectal Carcinoma and its Correlation with Tumor Progression. Open Access Maced J Med Sci 2021. [DOI: 10.3889/oamjms.2021.5879] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/05/2022] Open
Abstract
Introduction: There is an urgent need to identify predictive features and markers for colorectal carcinoma (CRC) progression and treatment. This study aimed to assess O6-methylguanine DNA methyltransferase (MGMT) expression in CRC and correlate with the clinico-pathological aspects of the tumor, also to evaluate the relationship between different histopathologic parameters and tumor progression.
Material and Methods: The study was carried on 70 colectomy using formalin fixed paraffin embedded tumor tissue. Immunohistochemistry was used to detect MGMT expression, and clinico-pathologic aspects as well as Tumor budding, type of desmoplastic reaction, inflammatory lymphocytic milieu, pattern of invasive front and necrosis were assessed Then correlated with MGMT expression and tumor progression, using parametric and nonparametric statistical methods.
Results: MGMT Loss of expression was detected in 42.9% of CRC cases. MGMT expression status was significantly correlated with tumor stage and metastatic status (p<0.05), while it was not correlated with other clinic-pathologic features, (p>0.05). Desmoplastic reaction (DR), tumor budding, stromal tumor infiltrating lymphocytes (TIL-S) and necrosis were correlated with tumor stage (p<0.05). DR correlated with tumor budding (p<0.05). Both types of TIL and Crohn’s-like lymphoid reaction (CLR) showed a mutual correlation (p<0.05).
Conclusion: MGMT high expression and histopathologic parameters as DR, tumor budding, inflammatory lymphocytic milieu and necrosis could be correlated with CRC progression.
Collapse
|
14
|
Zhang X, Zhang W, Cao P. Advances in CpG Island Methylator Phenotype Colorectal Cancer Therapies. Front Oncol 2021; 11:629390. [PMID: 33718206 PMCID: PMC7952756 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2021.629390] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/18/2020] [Accepted: 01/18/2021] [Indexed: 01/05/2023] Open
Abstract
With the aging of the population, the incidence of colorectal cancer in China is increasing. One of the epigenetic alterations: CpG island methylator phenotype (CIMP) plays an important role in the incidence of colorectal cancer. Recent studies have shown that CIMP is closely related to some specific clinicopathological phenotypes and multiple molecular phenotypes in colorectal cancer. In this paper, the newest progress of CIMP colorectal cancer in chemotherapeutic drugs, targeted agents and small molecular methylation inhibitors are going to be introduced. We hope to provide potential clinical treatment strategies for personalized and precise treatment of colorectal cancer patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xiaofei Zhang
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dalian University Affiliated Xinhua Hospital, Dalian, China
| | - Wenjun Zhang
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Dalian University Affiliated Xinhua Hospital, Dalian, China
| | - Pingan Cao
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dalian University Affiliated Xinhua Hospital, Dalian, China
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Moreno-Manuel A, Calabuig-Fariñas S, Obrador-Hevia A, Blasco A, Fernández-Díaz A, Sirera R, Camps C, Jantus-Lewintre E. dPCR application in liquid biopsies: divide and conquer. Expert Rev Mol Diagn 2020; 21:3-15. [PMID: 33305634 DOI: 10.1080/14737159.2021.1860759] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
Introduction: Precision medicine is already a reality in oncology, since biomarker-driven therapies have clearly improved patient survival. Furthermore, a new, minimally invasive strategy termed 'liquid biopsy' (LB) has revolutionized the field by allowing comprehensive cancer genomic profiling through the analysis of circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA). However, its detection requires extremely sensitive and efficient technologies. A powerful molecular tool based on the principle of 'divide and conquer' has emerged to solve this problem. Thus, digital PCR (dPCR) allows absolute and accurate quantification of target molecules.Areas covered: In this review we will discuss the fundamentals of dPCR and the most common approaches used for partition of samples and quantification. The advantages and limitations of dPCR will be mentioned in the context of LB in oncology.Expert opinion: In our opinion, dPCR has proven to be one of the most sensitive methods available for LB analysis, albeit some aspects such as its capacity of multiplexing and protocol standardization still require further improvements. Furthermore, the increasing sensitivities and lower costs of next generation sequencing (NGS) methods position dPCR as a confirmatory and complementary technique for NGS results which will likely prove to be very useful for treatment monitoring and assessing minimal residual disease.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andrea Moreno-Manuel
- Molecular Oncology Laboratory, Fundación Para La Investigación del Hospital General Universitario De Valencia, Valencia, Spain.,Mixed Unit TRIAL, (Príncipe Felipe Research Centre & Fundación Para La Investigación Del Hospital General Universitario De Valencia), Valencia, Spain
| | - Silvia Calabuig-Fariñas
- Molecular Oncology Laboratory, Fundación Para La Investigación del Hospital General Universitario De Valencia, Valencia, Spain.,Mixed Unit TRIAL, (Príncipe Felipe Research Centre & Fundación Para La Investigación Del Hospital General Universitario De Valencia), Valencia, Spain.,Department of Pathology, Universitat de València, València, Spain.,CIBERONC, Madrid, Spain
| | - Antonia Obrador-Hevia
- Group of Advanced Therapies and Biomarkers in Clinical Oncology, Health Research Institute of the Balearic Islands (Idisba), Son Espases University Hospital, Palma, Spain.,Molecular Diagnosis Unit, Son Espases University Hospital, Palma, Spain
| | - Ana Blasco
- CIBERONC, Madrid, Spain.,Medical Oncology Department, General University Hospital of Valencia, Valencia, Spain
| | - Amaya Fernández-Díaz
- Medical Oncology Department, General University Hospital of Valencia, Valencia, Spain
| | - Rafael Sirera
- Mixed Unit TRIAL, (Príncipe Felipe Research Centre & Fundación Para La Investigación Del Hospital General Universitario De Valencia), Valencia, Spain.,CIBERONC, Madrid, Spain.,Department of Biotechnology, Universitat Politècnica De València, Valencia, Spain
| | - Carlos Camps
- Molecular Oncology Laboratory, Fundación Para La Investigación del Hospital General Universitario De Valencia, Valencia, Spain.,Mixed Unit TRIAL, (Príncipe Felipe Research Centre & Fundación Para La Investigación Del Hospital General Universitario De Valencia), Valencia, Spain.,CIBERONC, Madrid, Spain.,Medical Oncology Department, General University Hospital of Valencia, Valencia, Spain.,Department of Medicine, Universitat De València, Valencia, Spain
| | - Eloisa Jantus-Lewintre
- Molecular Oncology Laboratory, Fundación Para La Investigación del Hospital General Universitario De Valencia, Valencia, Spain.,Mixed Unit TRIAL, (Príncipe Felipe Research Centre & Fundación Para La Investigación Del Hospital General Universitario De Valencia), Valencia, Spain.,CIBERONC, Madrid, Spain.,Department of Biotechnology, Universitat Politècnica De València, Valencia, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Treatments after first progression in metastatic colorectal cancer. A literature review and evidence-based algorithm. Cancer Treat Rev 2020; 92:102135. [PMID: 33307331 DOI: 10.1016/j.ctrv.2020.102135] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/08/2020] [Revised: 11/17/2020] [Accepted: 11/18/2020] [Indexed: 12/23/2022]
Abstract
Prolonging survival, achieving symptoms palliation and preserving quality of life are the primary therapeutic goals of treatments administered after disease progression in mCRC. Even if the impact of these therapies on the prognosis of affected patients is less relevant than the impact of the upfront treatment, tailoring the optimal second-line therapy is increasingly important. Several therapeutic options are available, and different factors including not only patient- and disease-related characteristics, but also the first-line treatment received (i.e., type, timing of disease progression, observed outcome and reported toxicities) may drive this choice. Herein, we describe the current state of the art in the landscape of treatments after progression in mCRC. Based on a critical review of the literature, we built a patient-oriented therapeutic algorithm, aiming to guide clinicians in their daily decision-making.
Collapse
|
17
|
Randon G, Pagani F, Pietrantonio F. MGMT Promoter Methylation as a Target In Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: Rapid Turnover and Use of Folates Alter its Study-Response. Clin Cancer Res 2020; 26:3495. [PMID: 32611628 DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-20-0817] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/01/2020] [Revised: 03/17/2020] [Accepted: 03/17/2020] [Indexed: 12/21/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Giovanni Randon
- Medical Oncology Department, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori di Milano, Milan, Italy
| | - Filippo Pagani
- Medical Oncology Department, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori di Milano, Milan, Italy
| | - Filippo Pietrantonio
- Medical Oncology Department, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori di Milano, Milan, Italy. .,Oncology and Hemato-oncology Department, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Cervena K, Siskova A, Buchler T, Vodicka P, Vymetalkova V. Methylation-Based Therapies for Colorectal Cancer. Cells 2020; 9:E1540. [PMID: 32599894 PMCID: PMC7349319 DOI: 10.3390/cells9061540] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/01/2020] [Revised: 06/22/2020] [Accepted: 06/23/2020] [Indexed: 02/08/2023] Open
Abstract
Colorectal carcinogenesis (CRC) is caused by the gradual long-term accumulation of both genetic and epigenetic changes. Recently, epigenetic alterations have been included in the classification of the CRC molecular subtype, and this points out their prognostic impact. As epigenetic modifications are reversible, they may represent relevant therapeutic targets. DNA methylation, catalyzed by DNA methyltransferases (DNMTs), regulates gene expression. For many years, the deregulation of DNA methylation has been considered to play a substantial part in CRC etiology and evolution. Despite considerable advances in CRC treatment, patient therapy response persists as limited, and their profit from systemic therapies are often hampered by the introduction of chemoresistance. In addition, inter-individual changes in therapy response in CRC patients can arise from their specific (epi)genetic compositions. In this review article, we summarize the options of CRC treatment based on DNA methylation status for their predictive value. This review also includes the therapy outcomes based on the patient's methylation status in CRC patients. In addition, the current challenge of research is to develop therapeutic inhibitors of DNMT. Based on the essential role of DNA methylation in CRC development, the application of DNMT inhibitors was recently proposed for the treatment of CRC patients, especially in patients with DNA hypermethylation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Klara Cervena
- Department of Molecular Biology of Cancer, Institute of Experimental Medicine, Videnska 1083, 14 200 Prague, Czech Republic; (K.C.); (A.S.); (P.V.)
- Institute of Biology and Medical Genetics, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Albertov 4, 128 00 Prague, Czech Republic
| | - Anna Siskova
- Department of Molecular Biology of Cancer, Institute of Experimental Medicine, Videnska 1083, 14 200 Prague, Czech Republic; (K.C.); (A.S.); (P.V.)
- Institute of Biology and Medical Genetics, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Albertov 4, 128 00 Prague, Czech Republic
| | - Tomas Buchler
- Department of Oncology, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and Thomayer Hospital, Videnska 800, 140 59 Prague, Czech Republic;
| | - Pavel Vodicka
- Department of Molecular Biology of Cancer, Institute of Experimental Medicine, Videnska 1083, 14 200 Prague, Czech Republic; (K.C.); (A.S.); (P.V.)
- Institute of Biology and Medical Genetics, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Albertov 4, 128 00 Prague, Czech Republic
- Biomedical Centre, Faculty of Medicine in Pilsen, Charles University, Alej Svobody 76, 323 00 Pilsen, Czech Republic
| | - Veronika Vymetalkova
- Department of Molecular Biology of Cancer, Institute of Experimental Medicine, Videnska 1083, 14 200 Prague, Czech Republic; (K.C.); (A.S.); (P.V.)
- Institute of Biology and Medical Genetics, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Albertov 4, 128 00 Prague, Czech Republic
- Biomedical Centre, Faculty of Medicine in Pilsen, Charles University, Alej Svobody 76, 323 00 Pilsen, Czech Republic
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Lai E, Liscia N, Donisi C, Mariani S, Tolu S, Pretta A, Persano M, Pinna G, Balconi F, Pireddu A, Impera V, Dubois M, Migliari M, Spanu D, Saba G, Camera S, Musio F, Ziranu P, Puzzoni M, Demurtas L, Pusceddu V, Dettori M, Massa E, Atzori F, Dessì M, Astara G, Madeddu C, Scartozzi M. Molecular-Biology-Driven Treatment for Metastatic Colorectal Cancer. Cancers (Basel) 2020; 12:E1214. [PMID: 32413973 PMCID: PMC7281737 DOI: 10.3390/cancers12051214] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/02/2020] [Revised: 05/03/2020] [Accepted: 05/07/2020] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Metastatic CRC (mCRC) is a molecular heterogeneous disease. The aim of this review is to give an overview of molecular-driven treatment of mCRC patients. METHODS A review of clinical trials, retrospective studies and case reports was performed regarding molecular biomarkers with therapeutic implications. RESULTS RAS wild-type status was confirmed as being crucial for anti-epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) monoclonal antibodies and for rechallenge strategy. Antiangiogenic therapies improve survival in first- and second-line settings, irrespective of RAS status, while tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) remain promising in refractory mCRC. Promising results emerged from anti-HER2 drugs trials in HER2-positive mCRC. Target inhibitors were successful for BRAFV600E mutant mCRC patients, while immunotherapy was successful for microsatellite instability-high/defective mismatch repair (MSI-H/dMMR) or DNA polymerase epsilon catalytic subunit (POLE-1) mutant patients. Data are still lacking on NTRK, RET, MGMT, and TGF-β, which require further research. CONCLUSION Several molecular biomarkers have been identified for the tailored treatment of mCRC patients and multiple efforts are currently ongoing to increase the therapeutic options. In the era of precision medicine, molecular-biology-driven treatment is the key to impro patient selection and patient outcomes. Further research and large phase III trials are required to ameliorate the therapeutic management of these patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eleonora Lai
- Medical Oncology Unit, University Hospital and University of Cagliari, 09042 Cagliari, Italy; (E.L.); (N.L.); (C.D.); (S.M.); (S.T.); (A.P.); (M.P.); (G.P.); (F.B.); (A.P.); (V.I.); (M.D.); (M.M.); (D.S.); (G.S.); (S.C.); (F.M.); (P.Z.); (M.P.); (L.D.); (V.P.); (E.M.); (F.A.); (M.D.); (G.A.); (C.M.)
| | - Nicole Liscia
- Medical Oncology Unit, University Hospital and University of Cagliari, 09042 Cagliari, Italy; (E.L.); (N.L.); (C.D.); (S.M.); (S.T.); (A.P.); (M.P.); (G.P.); (F.B.); (A.P.); (V.I.); (M.D.); (M.M.); (D.S.); (G.S.); (S.C.); (F.M.); (P.Z.); (M.P.); (L.D.); (V.P.); (E.M.); (F.A.); (M.D.); (G.A.); (C.M.)
- Medical Oncology Unit, Sapienza University of Rome, 00161 Rome, Italy
| | - Clelia Donisi
- Medical Oncology Unit, University Hospital and University of Cagliari, 09042 Cagliari, Italy; (E.L.); (N.L.); (C.D.); (S.M.); (S.T.); (A.P.); (M.P.); (G.P.); (F.B.); (A.P.); (V.I.); (M.D.); (M.M.); (D.S.); (G.S.); (S.C.); (F.M.); (P.Z.); (M.P.); (L.D.); (V.P.); (E.M.); (F.A.); (M.D.); (G.A.); (C.M.)
| | - Stefano Mariani
- Medical Oncology Unit, University Hospital and University of Cagliari, 09042 Cagliari, Italy; (E.L.); (N.L.); (C.D.); (S.M.); (S.T.); (A.P.); (M.P.); (G.P.); (F.B.); (A.P.); (V.I.); (M.D.); (M.M.); (D.S.); (G.S.); (S.C.); (F.M.); (P.Z.); (M.P.); (L.D.); (V.P.); (E.M.); (F.A.); (M.D.); (G.A.); (C.M.)
| | - Simona Tolu
- Medical Oncology Unit, University Hospital and University of Cagliari, 09042 Cagliari, Italy; (E.L.); (N.L.); (C.D.); (S.M.); (S.T.); (A.P.); (M.P.); (G.P.); (F.B.); (A.P.); (V.I.); (M.D.); (M.M.); (D.S.); (G.S.); (S.C.); (F.M.); (P.Z.); (M.P.); (L.D.); (V.P.); (E.M.); (F.A.); (M.D.); (G.A.); (C.M.)
- Medical Oncology Unit, Sapienza University of Rome, 00161 Rome, Italy
| | - Andrea Pretta
- Medical Oncology Unit, University Hospital and University of Cagliari, 09042 Cagliari, Italy; (E.L.); (N.L.); (C.D.); (S.M.); (S.T.); (A.P.); (M.P.); (G.P.); (F.B.); (A.P.); (V.I.); (M.D.); (M.M.); (D.S.); (G.S.); (S.C.); (F.M.); (P.Z.); (M.P.); (L.D.); (V.P.); (E.M.); (F.A.); (M.D.); (G.A.); (C.M.)
- Medical Oncology Unit, Sapienza University of Rome, 00161 Rome, Italy
| | - Mara Persano
- Medical Oncology Unit, University Hospital and University of Cagliari, 09042 Cagliari, Italy; (E.L.); (N.L.); (C.D.); (S.M.); (S.T.); (A.P.); (M.P.); (G.P.); (F.B.); (A.P.); (V.I.); (M.D.); (M.M.); (D.S.); (G.S.); (S.C.); (F.M.); (P.Z.); (M.P.); (L.D.); (V.P.); (E.M.); (F.A.); (M.D.); (G.A.); (C.M.)
| | - Giovanna Pinna
- Medical Oncology Unit, University Hospital and University of Cagliari, 09042 Cagliari, Italy; (E.L.); (N.L.); (C.D.); (S.M.); (S.T.); (A.P.); (M.P.); (G.P.); (F.B.); (A.P.); (V.I.); (M.D.); (M.M.); (D.S.); (G.S.); (S.C.); (F.M.); (P.Z.); (M.P.); (L.D.); (V.P.); (E.M.); (F.A.); (M.D.); (G.A.); (C.M.)
| | - Francesca Balconi
- Medical Oncology Unit, University Hospital and University of Cagliari, 09042 Cagliari, Italy; (E.L.); (N.L.); (C.D.); (S.M.); (S.T.); (A.P.); (M.P.); (G.P.); (F.B.); (A.P.); (V.I.); (M.D.); (M.M.); (D.S.); (G.S.); (S.C.); (F.M.); (P.Z.); (M.P.); (L.D.); (V.P.); (E.M.); (F.A.); (M.D.); (G.A.); (C.M.)
| | - Annagrazia Pireddu
- Medical Oncology Unit, University Hospital and University of Cagliari, 09042 Cagliari, Italy; (E.L.); (N.L.); (C.D.); (S.M.); (S.T.); (A.P.); (M.P.); (G.P.); (F.B.); (A.P.); (V.I.); (M.D.); (M.M.); (D.S.); (G.S.); (S.C.); (F.M.); (P.Z.); (M.P.); (L.D.); (V.P.); (E.M.); (F.A.); (M.D.); (G.A.); (C.M.)
- Medical Oncology Unit, Sapienza University of Rome, 00161 Rome, Italy
| | - Valentino Impera
- Medical Oncology Unit, University Hospital and University of Cagliari, 09042 Cagliari, Italy; (E.L.); (N.L.); (C.D.); (S.M.); (S.T.); (A.P.); (M.P.); (G.P.); (F.B.); (A.P.); (V.I.); (M.D.); (M.M.); (D.S.); (G.S.); (S.C.); (F.M.); (P.Z.); (M.P.); (L.D.); (V.P.); (E.M.); (F.A.); (M.D.); (G.A.); (C.M.)
- Medical Oncology Unit, Sapienza University of Rome, 00161 Rome, Italy
| | - Marco Dubois
- Medical Oncology Unit, University Hospital and University of Cagliari, 09042 Cagliari, Italy; (E.L.); (N.L.); (C.D.); (S.M.); (S.T.); (A.P.); (M.P.); (G.P.); (F.B.); (A.P.); (V.I.); (M.D.); (M.M.); (D.S.); (G.S.); (S.C.); (F.M.); (P.Z.); (M.P.); (L.D.); (V.P.); (E.M.); (F.A.); (M.D.); (G.A.); (C.M.)
| | - Marco Migliari
- Medical Oncology Unit, University Hospital and University of Cagliari, 09042 Cagliari, Italy; (E.L.); (N.L.); (C.D.); (S.M.); (S.T.); (A.P.); (M.P.); (G.P.); (F.B.); (A.P.); (V.I.); (M.D.); (M.M.); (D.S.); (G.S.); (S.C.); (F.M.); (P.Z.); (M.P.); (L.D.); (V.P.); (E.M.); (F.A.); (M.D.); (G.A.); (C.M.)
| | - Dario Spanu
- Medical Oncology Unit, University Hospital and University of Cagliari, 09042 Cagliari, Italy; (E.L.); (N.L.); (C.D.); (S.M.); (S.T.); (A.P.); (M.P.); (G.P.); (F.B.); (A.P.); (V.I.); (M.D.); (M.M.); (D.S.); (G.S.); (S.C.); (F.M.); (P.Z.); (M.P.); (L.D.); (V.P.); (E.M.); (F.A.); (M.D.); (G.A.); (C.M.)
| | - Giorgio Saba
- Medical Oncology Unit, University Hospital and University of Cagliari, 09042 Cagliari, Italy; (E.L.); (N.L.); (C.D.); (S.M.); (S.T.); (A.P.); (M.P.); (G.P.); (F.B.); (A.P.); (V.I.); (M.D.); (M.M.); (D.S.); (G.S.); (S.C.); (F.M.); (P.Z.); (M.P.); (L.D.); (V.P.); (E.M.); (F.A.); (M.D.); (G.A.); (C.M.)
| | - Silvia Camera
- Medical Oncology Unit, University Hospital and University of Cagliari, 09042 Cagliari, Italy; (E.L.); (N.L.); (C.D.); (S.M.); (S.T.); (A.P.); (M.P.); (G.P.); (F.B.); (A.P.); (V.I.); (M.D.); (M.M.); (D.S.); (G.S.); (S.C.); (F.M.); (P.Z.); (M.P.); (L.D.); (V.P.); (E.M.); (F.A.); (M.D.); (G.A.); (C.M.)
- Medical Oncology Unit, Sapienza University of Rome, 00161 Rome, Italy
| | - Francesca Musio
- Medical Oncology Unit, University Hospital and University of Cagliari, 09042 Cagliari, Italy; (E.L.); (N.L.); (C.D.); (S.M.); (S.T.); (A.P.); (M.P.); (G.P.); (F.B.); (A.P.); (V.I.); (M.D.); (M.M.); (D.S.); (G.S.); (S.C.); (F.M.); (P.Z.); (M.P.); (L.D.); (V.P.); (E.M.); (F.A.); (M.D.); (G.A.); (C.M.)
| | - Pina Ziranu
- Medical Oncology Unit, University Hospital and University of Cagliari, 09042 Cagliari, Italy; (E.L.); (N.L.); (C.D.); (S.M.); (S.T.); (A.P.); (M.P.); (G.P.); (F.B.); (A.P.); (V.I.); (M.D.); (M.M.); (D.S.); (G.S.); (S.C.); (F.M.); (P.Z.); (M.P.); (L.D.); (V.P.); (E.M.); (F.A.); (M.D.); (G.A.); (C.M.)
| | - Marco Puzzoni
- Medical Oncology Unit, University Hospital and University of Cagliari, 09042 Cagliari, Italy; (E.L.); (N.L.); (C.D.); (S.M.); (S.T.); (A.P.); (M.P.); (G.P.); (F.B.); (A.P.); (V.I.); (M.D.); (M.M.); (D.S.); (G.S.); (S.C.); (F.M.); (P.Z.); (M.P.); (L.D.); (V.P.); (E.M.); (F.A.); (M.D.); (G.A.); (C.M.)
| | - Laura Demurtas
- Medical Oncology Unit, University Hospital and University of Cagliari, 09042 Cagliari, Italy; (E.L.); (N.L.); (C.D.); (S.M.); (S.T.); (A.P.); (M.P.); (G.P.); (F.B.); (A.P.); (V.I.); (M.D.); (M.M.); (D.S.); (G.S.); (S.C.); (F.M.); (P.Z.); (M.P.); (L.D.); (V.P.); (E.M.); (F.A.); (M.D.); (G.A.); (C.M.)
| | - Valeria Pusceddu
- Medical Oncology Unit, University Hospital and University of Cagliari, 09042 Cagliari, Italy; (E.L.); (N.L.); (C.D.); (S.M.); (S.T.); (A.P.); (M.P.); (G.P.); (F.B.); (A.P.); (V.I.); (M.D.); (M.M.); (D.S.); (G.S.); (S.C.); (F.M.); (P.Z.); (M.P.); (L.D.); (V.P.); (E.M.); (F.A.); (M.D.); (G.A.); (C.M.)
| | - Manuela Dettori
- Medical Oncology Unit, Azienda Ospedaliera Brotzu, Ospedale Businco, 09134 Cagliari, Italy
| | - Elena Massa
- Medical Oncology Unit, University Hospital and University of Cagliari, 09042 Cagliari, Italy; (E.L.); (N.L.); (C.D.); (S.M.); (S.T.); (A.P.); (M.P.); (G.P.); (F.B.); (A.P.); (V.I.); (M.D.); (M.M.); (D.S.); (G.S.); (S.C.); (F.M.); (P.Z.); (M.P.); (L.D.); (V.P.); (E.M.); (F.A.); (M.D.); (G.A.); (C.M.)
| | - Francesco Atzori
- Medical Oncology Unit, University Hospital and University of Cagliari, 09042 Cagliari, Italy; (E.L.); (N.L.); (C.D.); (S.M.); (S.T.); (A.P.); (M.P.); (G.P.); (F.B.); (A.P.); (V.I.); (M.D.); (M.M.); (D.S.); (G.S.); (S.C.); (F.M.); (P.Z.); (M.P.); (L.D.); (V.P.); (E.M.); (F.A.); (M.D.); (G.A.); (C.M.)
| | - Mariele Dessì
- Medical Oncology Unit, University Hospital and University of Cagliari, 09042 Cagliari, Italy; (E.L.); (N.L.); (C.D.); (S.M.); (S.T.); (A.P.); (M.P.); (G.P.); (F.B.); (A.P.); (V.I.); (M.D.); (M.M.); (D.S.); (G.S.); (S.C.); (F.M.); (P.Z.); (M.P.); (L.D.); (V.P.); (E.M.); (F.A.); (M.D.); (G.A.); (C.M.)
| | - Giorgio Astara
- Medical Oncology Unit, University Hospital and University of Cagliari, 09042 Cagliari, Italy; (E.L.); (N.L.); (C.D.); (S.M.); (S.T.); (A.P.); (M.P.); (G.P.); (F.B.); (A.P.); (V.I.); (M.D.); (M.M.); (D.S.); (G.S.); (S.C.); (F.M.); (P.Z.); (M.P.); (L.D.); (V.P.); (E.M.); (F.A.); (M.D.); (G.A.); (C.M.)
| | - Clelia Madeddu
- Medical Oncology Unit, University Hospital and University of Cagliari, 09042 Cagliari, Italy; (E.L.); (N.L.); (C.D.); (S.M.); (S.T.); (A.P.); (M.P.); (G.P.); (F.B.); (A.P.); (V.I.); (M.D.); (M.M.); (D.S.); (G.S.); (S.C.); (F.M.); (P.Z.); (M.P.); (L.D.); (V.P.); (E.M.); (F.A.); (M.D.); (G.A.); (C.M.)
| | - Mario Scartozzi
- Medical Oncology Unit, University Hospital and University of Cagliari, 09042 Cagliari, Italy; (E.L.); (N.L.); (C.D.); (S.M.); (S.T.); (A.P.); (M.P.); (G.P.); (F.B.); (A.P.); (V.I.); (M.D.); (M.M.); (D.S.); (G.S.); (S.C.); (F.M.); (P.Z.); (M.P.); (L.D.); (V.P.); (E.M.); (F.A.); (M.D.); (G.A.); (C.M.)
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Petrelli F, Perego G, Ghidini A, Ghidini M, Borgonovo K, Scolari C, Nozza R, Rampulla V, Costanzo A, Varricchio A, Rausa E, Pietrantonio F, Zaniboni A. A systematic review of salvage therapies in refractory metastatic colorectal cancer. Int J Colorectal Dis 2020; 35:783-794. [PMID: 32219509 DOI: 10.1007/s00384-020-03571-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 03/13/2020] [Indexed: 02/04/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Established that the only approved agents in previously treated metastatic colorectal cancer (CRC) are trifluoridine/tipiracil and regorafenib, we conducted a systematic review of all the published phase 2-3 trials, with the scope to evaluate the benefit of any later-line regimens in refractory metastatic CRC. METHODS Phase 2-3 studies that enrolled patients with stage IV disease receiving salvage therapies for refractory CRC were identified using electronic databases (Pubmed, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library). Clinical outcomes were pooled using a point estimates for the weighted values of median overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), response rate (ORR), stable disease rate (SD), and 6-month and 1-year OS. RESULTS Overall, 7556 patients were included from 67 studies (n = 70 arms). Overall, the pooled ORR and SD were 15.4% (95% CI 13-18%) and 36.9% (95% CI 33.5-40.6%). Median PFS, 6-month and 1-year OS, and median OS were 3.2 (95% CI 2.9-3.3) months, 65.4% (95% CI 61.9-68.8%), 36% (95% CI 32.3-39.9%) and 8.8 (95% CI 8.3-9.2) months. Overall survival was different in the monochemotherapy, polychemotherapy, chemotherapy + targeted therapy, and targeted therapy alone arms (7.6, 9.5, 10.3, and 7.9 months, respectively, P for difference = 0.01). Median PFS were respectively 2.3, 3.9, 3.8, and 2.6, respectively (P for difference < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS Overall, combination therapy (polychemotherapy with or without targeted agents) is associated with a higher control of disease and better outcome than approved agents. Treatment, if possible, should be personalized according to the patients' conditions, physician preference and molecular profile of disease.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fausto Petrelli
- Oncology Unit, Medical Sciences Department, ASST Bergamo Ovest, Piazzale Ospedale 1, 24047, Treviglio, BG, Italy.
| | | | | | - Michele Ghidini
- Oncology Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda, Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Milan, Italy
| | - Karen Borgonovo
- Oncology Unit, Medical Sciences Department, ASST Bergamo Ovest, Piazzale Ospedale 1, 24047, Treviglio, BG, Italy
| | | | - Renata Nozza
- Pharmacy Unit, ASST Bergamo Ovest, Treviglio, BG, Italy
| | | | - Antonio Costanzo
- Surgical Oncology Unit, ASST Bergamo Ovest, Treviglio, BG, Italy
| | | | | | - Filippo Pietrantonio
- Oncology Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale Tumori di Milano, Milan, Italy
| | | |
Collapse
|
21
|
Oxidative Damage in Sporadic Colorectal Cancer: Molecular Mapping of Base Excision Repair Glycosylases in Colorectal Cancer Patients. Int J Mol Sci 2020; 21:ijms21072473. [PMID: 32252452 PMCID: PMC7177219 DOI: 10.3390/ijms21072473] [Citation(s) in RCA: 27] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/13/2020] [Revised: 03/30/2020] [Accepted: 03/31/2020] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Oxidative stress with subsequent premutagenic oxidative DNA damage has been implicated in colorectal carcinogenesis. The repair of oxidative DNA damage is initiated by lesion-specific DNA glycosylases (hOGG1, NTH1, MUTYH). The direct evidence of the role of oxidative DNA damage and its repair is proven by hereditary syndromes (MUTYH-associated polyposis, NTHL1-associated tumor syndrome), where germline mutations cause loss-of-function in glycosylases of base excision repair, thus enabling the accumulation of oxidative DNA damage and leading to the adenoma-colorectal cancer transition. Unrepaired oxidative DNA damage often results in G:C>T:A mutations in tumor suppressor genes and proto-oncogenes and widespread occurrence of chromosomal copy-neutral loss of heterozygosity. However, the situation is more complicated in complex and heterogeneous disease, such as sporadic colorectal cancer. Here we summarized our current knowledge of the role of oxidative DNA damage and its repair on the onset, prognosis and treatment of sporadic colorectal cancer. Molecular and histological tumor heterogeneity was considered. Our study has also suggested an additional important source of oxidative DNA damage due to intestinal dysbiosis. The roles of base excision repair glycosylases (hOGG1, MUTYH) in tumor and adjacent mucosa tissues of colorectal cancer patients, particularly in the interplay with other factors (especially microenvironment), deserve further attention. Base excision repair characteristics determined in colorectal cancer tissues reflect, rather, a disease prognosis. Finally, we discuss the role of DNA repair in the treatment of colon cancer, since acquired or inherited defects in DNA repair pathways can be effectively used in therapy.
Collapse
|
22
|
Pietrantonio F, Randon G, Romagnoli D, Di Donato S, Benelli M, de Braud F. Biomarker-guided implementation of the old drug temozolomide as a novel treatment option for patients with metastatic colorectal cancer. Cancer Treat Rev 2020; 82:101935. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ctrv.2019.101935] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/05/2019] [Revised: 11/21/2019] [Accepted: 11/22/2019] [Indexed: 12/21/2022]
|
23
|
Pietrantonio F, Lobefaro R, Antista M, Lonardi S, Raimondi A, Morano F, Mosconi S, Rimassa L, Murgioni S, Sartore-Bianchi A, Tomasello G, Longarini R, Farina G, Petrelli F, Gori S, Randon G, Corallo S, Pagani F, Guarini V, Palermo F, Martinetti A, Macagno M, Barault L, Perrone F, Tamborini E, Milione M, Di Nicolantonio F, Di Maio M, Fucà G, Di Bartolomeo M, de Braud F. Capecitabine and Temozolomide versus FOLFIRI in RAS-Mutated, MGMT-Methylated Metastatic Colorectal Cancer. Clin Cancer Res 2019; 26:1017-1024. [PMID: 31740551 DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-19-3024] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/14/2019] [Revised: 10/16/2019] [Accepted: 11/13/2019] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE To determine whether second-line therapy with capecitabine and temozolomide was superior to irinotecan, leucovorin, and fluorouracil (FOLFIRI) in patients with RAS-mutated, methyl-guanine methyltransferase (MGMT)-methylated metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). PATIENTS AND METHODS In this randomized, phase II trial, we enrolled patients with RAS-mutated, MGMT-methylated mCRC after failure of oxaliplatin-based regimen. Patients with centrally confirmed MGMT methylation were stratified by first-line progression-free survival (PFS) and prior bevacizumab and randomized to either capecitabine plus temozolomide (arm A, CAPTEM) or FOLFIRI (arm B). The primary endpoint was PFS analyzed on intention-to-treat basis, with 90% power and one-sided significance level of 0.05 to detect an increase of median time from 2 months in arm B to 4 months in arm A. RESULTS Between November 2014 and May 2019, 86 patients were randomly assigned to arm A (n = 43) or arm B (n = 43). After a median follow-up of 30.5 months (interquartile range, 12.2-36.3), 79 disease progression or death events occurred. Superiority of arm A was not demonstrated (one-sided P = 0.223). Progression-free survival and overall survival were 3.5 (2.0-5.0) and 9.5 (8.2-25.8) in arm A versus 3.5 (2.3-6.1) and 10.6 (8.5-20.8) in arm B [HR = 1.19 (0.82-1.72) and HR = 0.97 (0.58-1.61)], respectively. Grade ≥3 treatment-related adverse events had higher incidence in arm B versus A (47.6% vs 16.3%), and quality of life was significantly worse in arm B. Patients with positive MGMT expression by IHC did not benefit from CAPTEM. CONCLUSIONS Temozolomide-based therapy warrants further investigation in molecularly hyperselected subgroups.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Filippo Pietrantonio
- Oncology and Hemato-oncology Department, University of Milan, Milan, Italy. .,Medical Oncology Department, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori di Milano, Milan, Italy
| | - Riccardo Lobefaro
- Medical Oncology Department, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori di Milano, Milan, Italy
| | - Maria Antista
- Medical Oncology Department, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori di Milano, Milan, Italy
| | - Sara Lonardi
- Medical Oncology 1 Unit, Department of Oncology, Istituto Oncologico Veneto IOV-IRCCS, Padua, Italy
| | - Alessandra Raimondi
- Medical Oncology Department, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori di Milano, Milan, Italy
| | - Federica Morano
- Medical Oncology Department, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori di Milano, Milan, Italy
| | - Stefania Mosconi
- Medical Oncology Unit, Department of Oncology and Hematology, Papa Giovanni XXIII Hospital, Bergamo, Italy
| | - Lorenza Rimassa
- Medical Oncology and Hematology Unit, Humanitas Cancer Center, Humanitas Clinical and Research Center-IRCCS, Rozzano, Milano, Italy.,Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Milan, Italy
| | - Sabina Murgioni
- Medical Oncology 1 Unit, Department of Oncology, Istituto Oncologico Veneto IOV-IRCCS, Padua, Italy
| | - Andrea Sartore-Bianchi
- Oncology and Hemato-oncology Department, University of Milan, Milan, Italy.,Niguarda Cancer Center, Grande Ospedale Metropolitano Niguarda, Milan, Italy
| | | | | | - Gabriella Farina
- Medical Oncology Department, Fatebenefratelli-Sacco Hospital, Milan, Italy
| | - Fausto Petrelli
- Medical Oncology Unit, Oncology Department, ASST Bergamo Ovest, Treviglio (BG), Italy
| | - Stefania Gori
- Medical Oncology Unit, IRCCS Ospedale Sacro Cuore Don Calabria, Negrar, Verona, Italy
| | - Giovanni Randon
- Medical Oncology Department, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori di Milano, Milan, Italy
| | - Salvatore Corallo
- Medical Oncology Department, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori di Milano, Milan, Italy
| | - Filippo Pagani
- Medical Oncology Department, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori di Milano, Milan, Italy
| | - Vincenzo Guarini
- Medical Oncology Department, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori di Milano, Milan, Italy
| | - Federica Palermo
- Medical Oncology Department, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori di Milano, Milan, Italy
| | - Antonia Martinetti
- Medical Oncology Department, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori di Milano, Milan, Italy
| | - Marco Macagno
- Candiolo Cancer Institute, FPO - IRCCS, Candiolo (TO), Italy
| | - Ludovic Barault
- Candiolo Cancer Institute, FPO - IRCCS, Candiolo (TO), Italy.,Oncology Department, University of Turin, Candiolo (TO), Italy
| | - Federica Perrone
- Pathology and Laboratory Medicine Department, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori di Milano, Milan, Italy
| | - Elena Tamborini
- Pathology and Laboratory Medicine Department, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori di Milano, Milan, Italy
| | - Massimo Milione
- Pathology and Laboratory Medicine Department, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori di Milano, Milan, Italy
| | - Federica Di Nicolantonio
- Candiolo Cancer Institute, FPO - IRCCS, Candiolo (TO), Italy.,Oncology Department, University of Turin, Candiolo (TO), Italy
| | - Massimo Di Maio
- Oncology Department, University of Turin, Ordine Mauriziano Hospital, Turin, Italy
| | - Giovanni Fucà
- Medical Oncology Department, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori di Milano, Milan, Italy
| | - Maria Di Bartolomeo
- Medical Oncology Department, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori di Milano, Milan, Italy
| | - Filippo de Braud
- Oncology and Hemato-oncology Department, University of Milan, Milan, Italy.,Medical Oncology Department, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori di Milano, Milan, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Taieb J, Jung A, Sartore-Bianchi A, Peeters M, Seligmann J, Zaanan A, Burdon P, Montagut C, Laurent-Puig P. The Evolving Biomarker Landscape for Treatment Selection in Metastatic Colorectal Cancer. Drugs 2019; 79:1375-1394. [PMID: 31347092 PMCID: PMC6728290 DOI: 10.1007/s40265-019-01165-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 35] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
Abstract
The approval of targeted therapies for metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) has led to important improvements in patient outcomes. However, it is still necessary to increase individualisation of treatments based on tumour genetic profiles to optimise efficacy, while minimising toxicity. As such, there is currently great focus on the discovery and validation of further biomarkers in mCRC, with many new potential prognostic and predictive markers being identified alongside developments in patient molecular profiling technologies. Here, we review data for validated and emerging biomarkers impacting treatment strategies in mCRC. We completed a structured literature search of the PubMed database to identify relevant publications, limiting for English-language publications published between 1 January 2014 and 11 July 2018. In addition, we performed a manual search of the key general oncology and CRC-focused congresses to identify abstracts reporting emerging mCRC biomarker data, and of ClinicalTrials.gov to identify ongoing clinical trials investigating emerging biomarkers in mCRC and/or molecular-guided clinical trials. There is solid evidence supporting the use of BRAF status as a prognostic biomarker and DYPD, UGT1A1, RAS, and microsatellite instability as predictive biomarkers in mCRC. There are a number of emerging biomarkers that may prove to be clinically relevant in the future to have prognostic (HPP1 methylation), predictive (HER3, microRNAs, anti-angiogenic markers, and CRC intrinsic subtypes), or both prognostic and predictive values (HER2, CpG island methylator phenotype, tumour mutational load, gene fusions, and consensus molecular subtypes). As such, new biomarker-led treatment strategies in addition to anti-epidermal growth factor receptor and anti-angiogenetic treatments are being explored. Biomarkers that are not recommended to be tested in clinical practice or are unlikely to be imminently clinically relevant for mCRC include thymidylate transferase, ERCC1, PIK3CA, and PTEN. We highlight the clinical utility of existing and emerging biomarkers in mCRC and provide recommended treatment strategies according to the biomarker status. An update on ongoing molecular-guided clinical trials is also provided.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Julien Taieb
- Sorbonne Paris Cité, Paris Descartes University, Georges Pompidou European Hospital, Paris, France.
| | - Andreas Jung
- Pathology Institute, Ludwig Maximilians University of Munich, Munich, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), partner site Munich and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Andrea Sartore-Bianchi
- Niguarda Cancer Center, Grande Ospedale Metropolitano Niguarda, Milan, Italy
- Department of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| | - Marc Peeters
- Department of Oncology, Antwerp University Hospital/Antwerp University, Edegem, Belgium
| | - Jenny Seligmann
- Division of Cancer Studies and Pathology, St James's Institute of Oncology, Leeds, UK
| | - Aziz Zaanan
- Sorbonne Paris Cité, Paris Descartes University, Georges Pompidou European Hospital, Paris, France
| | - Peter Burdon
- European Medical, Amgen (Europe) GmbH, Rotkreuz, Switzerland
| | - Clara Montagut
- Medical Oncology Department, Hospital del Mar-IMIM, CIBERONC, HM Delfos, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Pierre Laurent-Puig
- Sorbonne Paris Cité, Paris Descartes University, Georges Pompidou European Hospital, Paris, France
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Abstract
Twenty-five years ago, the cytotoxic drug irinotecan (IRT) was first approved in Japan for the treatment of cancer. For more than two decades, the IRT prodrug has largely contributed to the treatment of solid tumors worldwide. Nowadays, this camptothecin derivative targeting topoisomerase 1 remains largely used in combination regimen, like FOLFIRI and FOLFIRINOX, to treat metastatic or advanced solid tumors, such as colon, gastric and pancreatic cancers and others. This review highlights recent discoveries in the field of IRT and its derivatives, including analogues of the active metabolite SN38 (such as FL118), the recently approved liposomal form Nal-IRI and SN38-based immuno-conjugates currently in development (such as sacituzumab govitecan). New information about the IRT mechanism of action are presented, including the discovery of a new protein target, the single-stranded DNA-binding protein FUBP1. Significant progress has been made also to better understand and manage the main limiting toxicities of IRT, chiefly neutropenia and diarrhea. The role of drug-induced inflammation and dysbiosis is underlined and strategies to limit the intestinal toxicity of IRT are discussed (use of β-glucuronidase inhibitors, plant extracts, probiotics). The detailed knowledge of the metabolism of IRT has enabled the identification of potential biomarkers to guide patient selection and to limit drug-induced toxicities, but no robust IRT-specific therapeutic biomarker has been approved yet. IRT is a versatile chemotherapeutic agent which combines well with a variety of anticancer drugs. It offers a large range of drug combinations with cytotoxic agents, targeted products and immuno-active biotherapeutics, to treat a variety of advanced solid carcinoma, sarcoma and cancers with progressive central nervous system diseases. A quarter of century after its first launch, IRT remains an essential anticancer drug, largely prescribed, useful to many patients and scientifically inspiring.
Collapse
|
26
|
Zhu H, Yang X, Zhao Y, Yi C. Efficacy of anti-PD-1 antibody SHR-1210 as second-line treatment in hepatocellular carcinoma patient with sorafenib resistance: A case report. Medicine (Baltimore) 2019; 98:e15755. [PMID: 31096541 PMCID: PMC6531185 DOI: 10.1097/md.0000000000015755] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/05/2023] Open
Abstract
RATIONALE Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), one of the most common cancers worldwide, is an aggressive tumor with very poor prognosis. Regorafenib was the first agent to show a survival benefit over placebo in patients who showed progression while being treated with sorafenib, but it remains an unsatisfactory agent owing to its serious side effects. Therefore, more efficient and milder therapies are needed. PATIENT CONCERNS Herein, we report a patient with advanced HCC with many lung metastases who showed progression during sorafenib treatment. DIAGNOSES HCC with lung metastases (stage IVB). INTERVENTIONS SHR-1210 alone was used as second-line treatment. OUTCOMES Although the lung metastases did not decrease 3 months after the treatment, they decreased significantly at 6 months after the treatment and partially disappeared. The tumor response indicated partial response. Furthermore, all of the lung metastases continued to decrease at about 17 months after treatment. The alpha-fetoprotein levels showed a similar trend. After a follow up of 19 months, the patient remains in good health. LESSONS SHR-1210 alone as a second-line treatment for a patient with HCC showed excellent antitumor effects. We think that SHR-1210 may exert its antitumor effects through a late-onset model, which persist for a long time. The side effects were mild and well tolerated.
Collapse
|
27
|
Cremolini C, Benelli M, Fontana E, Pagani F, Rossini D, Fucà G, Busico A, Conca E, Di Donato S, Loupakis F, Schirripa M, Lonardi S, Borelli B, Ongaro E, Eason K, Morano F, Casagrande M, Fassan M, Sadanandam A, de Braud F, Falcone A, Pietrantonio F. Benefit from anti-EGFRs in RAS and BRAF wild-type metastatic transverse colon cancer: a clinical and molecular proof of concept study. ESMO Open 2019; 4:e000489. [PMID: 30962964 PMCID: PMC6435314 DOI: 10.1136/esmoopen-2019-000489] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/08/2019] [Revised: 02/05/2019] [Accepted: 02/06/2019] [Indexed: 12/22/2022] Open
Abstract
Objective Primary tumour location is regarded as a reliable surrogate of colorectal cancer biology. Sensitivity to anti-EGFRs (Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor) of metastatic transverse colon cancers (mTCCs) has usually been assumed similar to right-sided tumours; however, evidence about the clinical behaviour of mTCC is limited. Thus, to verify sensitivity of mTCC to anti-EGFRs we conducted the present study. Methods Patients with RAS/BRAF wild-type microsatellite stable (MSS) mTCC receiving anti-EGFR monotherapy, or in combination with irinotecan if clearly irinotecan-refractory, were included. Hypothesising an overall response rate (ORR) of 35%, 11 patients, of whom at least 3 were responders, were necessary to be able to reject the null hypothesis of an ORR of 5%, with α and β errors of 0.05 and 0.20. PRESSING panel and consensus molecular subtypes (CMS) were assessed on tumour samples, whereas in-silico data were obtained from TCGA dataset. Results Among nine eligible patients, four and three achieved response and disease stabilisation (ORR 44%). At a median follow-up of 23.1 months, median progression-free survival and overall survival were 7.3 (95% CI 3.9 to NA) and 15.0 months (95% CI 10.0 to NA), respectively. A MET amplification and an ERBB4 S303F substitution were detected in patients with rapid disease progression, while others had PRESSING panel-negative tumours with CMS2 or CMS4 subtypes. Conclusions RAS/BRAF wild-type MSS mTCCs may be sensitive to anti-EGFRs, as confirmed by molecular analyses.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chiara Cremolini
- Unit of Medical Oncology 2, Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria Pisana, Pisa, Italy.,Department of Translational Research and New Technologies in Medicine and Surgery, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy
| | - Matteo Benelli
- Bioinformatics Unit, Oncology Department, Hospital of Prato, Prato, Italy
| | - Elisa Fontana
- Division of Molecular Pathology, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK.,Centre for Molecular Pathology, Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Filippo Pagani
- Medical Oncology Department, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milano, Italy
| | - Daniele Rossini
- Unit of Medical Oncology 2, Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria Pisana, Pisa, Italy.,Department of Translational Research and New Technologies in Medicine and Surgery, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy
| | - Giovanni Fucà
- Medical Oncology Department, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milano, Italy
| | - Adele Busico
- Department of Diagnostic Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy
| | - Elena Conca
- Department of Diagnostic Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy
| | - Samantha Di Donato
- Medical Oncology Unit, Oncology Department, Hospital of Prato, Prato, Italy
| | - Fotios Loupakis
- Unit of Medical Oncology 1, Department of Clinical and Experimental Oncology, IRCCS Istituto Oncologico Veneto, Padova, Italy
| | - Marta Schirripa
- Unit of Medical Oncology 1, Department of Clinical and Experimental Oncology, IRCCS Istituto Oncologico Veneto, Padova, Italy
| | - Sara Lonardi
- Unit of Medical Oncology 1, Department of Clinical and Experimental Oncology, IRCCS Istituto Oncologico Veneto, Padova, Italy
| | - Beatrice Borelli
- Unit of Medical Oncology 2, Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria Pisana, Pisa, Italy.,Department of Translational Research and New Technologies in Medicine and Surgery, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy
| | - Elena Ongaro
- Unit of Medical Oncology 2, Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria Pisana, Pisa, Italy.,Department of Translational Research and New Technologies in Medicine and Surgery, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy.,Department of Oncology, Azienda Sanitaria Universitaria Integrata di Udine, Udine, Italy
| | - Katherine Eason
- Division of Molecular Pathology, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK
| | - Federica Morano
- Medical Oncology Department, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milano, Italy
| | - Mariaelena Casagrande
- Department of Oncology, Azienda Sanitaria Universitaria Integrata di Udine, Udine, Italy
| | - Matteo Fassan
- Unit of Surgical Pathology, Department of Medicine, University of Padova, Padova, Italy
| | - Anguraj Sadanandam
- Division of Molecular Pathology, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK.,Centre for Molecular Pathology, Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Filippo de Braud
- Medical Oncology Department, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milano, Italy.,Department of Oncology and Hemato-oncology, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| | - Alfredo Falcone
- Unit of Medical Oncology 2, Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria Pisana, Pisa, Italy.,Department of Translational Research and New Technologies in Medicine and Surgery, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy
| | - Filippo Pietrantonio
- Medical Oncology Department, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milano, Italy.,Department of Oncology and Hemato-oncology, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Zhu H, Zhang C, Yang X, Yi C. Treatment with Brivanib alaninate as a second-line monotherapy after Sorafenib failure in hepatocellular carcinoma: A case report. Medicine (Baltimore) 2019; 98:e14823. [PMID: 30855507 PMCID: PMC6417557 DOI: 10.1097/md.0000000000014823] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/05/2023] Open
Abstract
RATIONALE Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is one of the most frequent causes of cancer-related death worldwide. Its poor prognosis is due to the high invasiveness of the disease and limited efficacy of available treatments. PATIENT CONCERNS We reported an HCC patient who developed lung metastases 1 year after HCC resection. Sorafenib was then initiated; however, disease progression was noted 3 months later. Sorafenib therapy was initially maintained due to lack of effective alternatives, but disease progression continued. DIAGNOSES HCC patient with lung metastases, and pulmonary portal, and mediastinal lymph node metastases (stage IVB). INTERVENTIONS Brivanib alaninate was used alone as second-line therapy. OUTCOMES All metastases showed increased size on radiographic imaging approximately 3 months after brivanib alaninate was initiated. However, 2.5 months later, the lung metastases significantly decreased in size or disappeared. The pulmonary portal, and mediastinal lymph node metastases also significantly decreased in size. At 9.5 months after brivanib alaninate initiation, the pulmonary portal, and mediastinal lymph node metastases nearly disappeared, and the lung metastases continued to decrease in size. Alpha fetoprotein (AFP) level showed the same change pattern as the tumor-response observed on radiographic imaging. The total duration of brivanib alaninate treatment was 11 months, which was stopped due to repeated grade 2 thrombocytopenia. The other side effects were tolerable. Fifteen months after initiation of brivanib alaninate, the patient remained in very good condition without evidence of disease progression. LESSONS Brivanib alaninate alone as second-line therapy showed excellent antitumor efficacy for an HCC patient with numerous lung and lymph node metastases. It may exert its antitumor effects in a delayed-onset fashion. We suggest that patients receive brivanib alaninate for a long duration to fully determine its efficacy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hong Zhu
- Department of Medical Oncology, Cancer Center, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu
| | - Chunyan Zhang
- Department of Medical Oncology, The People's Hospital of Ganzi Tibetan Autonomous Prefecture, Ganzi, Sichuan, P.R. China
| | - Xi Yang
- Department of Medical Oncology, Cancer Center, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu
| | - Cheng Yi
- Department of Medical Oncology, Cancer Center, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Schwartz S, Szeto C, Tian Y, Cecchi F, Corallo S, Calegari MA, Di Bartolomeo M, Morano F, Raimondi A, Fucà G, Martinetti A, De Pascalis I, Martini M, Belfiore A, Milione M, Orlandi A, Barault L, Barone C, de Braud F, Di Nicolantonio F, Benz S, Hembrough T, Pietrantonio F. Refining the selection of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer for treatment with temozolomide using proteomic analysis of O6-methylguanine-DNA-methyltransferase. Eur J Cancer 2019; 107:164-174. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2018.11.016] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/29/2018] [Revised: 11/08/2018] [Accepted: 11/11/2018] [Indexed: 12/21/2022]
|
30
|
Cha Y, Kim SY, Yeo HY, Baek JY, Choi MK, Jung KH, Dong SM, Chang HJ. Association of CHFR Promoter Methylation with Treatment Outcomes of Irinotecan-Based Chemotherapy in Metastatic Colorectal Cancer. Neoplasia 2018; 21:146-155. [PMID: 30562637 PMCID: PMC6297269 DOI: 10.1016/j.neo.2018.11.010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/03/2018] [Accepted: 11/27/2018] [Indexed: 02/08/2023] Open
Abstract
Aberrant promoter methylation plays a vital role in colorectal carcinogenesis. However, its role in treatment responses is unclear, especially for metastatic disease. Here, we investigated the association between promoter methylation and treatment outcomes of irinotecan-based chemotherapy in 102 patients with metastatic colorectal cancer. Promoter methylation was examined by methylation-specific polymerase chain reaction for three loci (CHFR, WRN, and SULF2) associated with chemotherapy response and five CpG island methylator phenotype (CIMP)–specific markers (CACNA1G, IGF2, NEUROG1, RUNX3, and SOCS1). Association between CHFR methylation and in vitro sensitivity to irinotecan was also evaluated. Promoter methylation of CHFR, WRN, and SULF2 was identified in 16 (15.7%), 24 (23.5%), and 33 (32.4%) patients, respectively. CIMP status was positive in 22 (21.6%) patients. CHFR methylation was associated with a significantly longer time to progression (TTP) (median: 8.77 vs. 4.43 months, P = .019), with trends favoring higher overall survival (OS) (median: 22.83 vs. 20.17 months, P = .300) and response rates (31.3% vs. 17.4%, P = .300). For patients with unmethylated CHFR, TTP (median: 5.60 vs. 3.53, P = .020) and OS (median: 20.57 vs. 9.23, P = .006) were significantly different according to CIMP status. Colorectal cancer cell lines with CHFR methylation demonstrated increased sensitivity to irinotecan. Both CHFR overexpression and combination with 5-aza-2′-deoxycytidine reversed irinotecan sensitivity in CHFR-methylated cell lines, whereas CHFR knockdown in unmethylated cells restored sensitivity to irinotecan. These data suggest that CHFR methylation may be associated with favorable treatment outcomes of irinotecan-based chemotherapy in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yongjun Cha
- Center for Colorectal Cancer, National Cancer Center, Goyang, Korea; Precision Medicine Branch, Division of Precision Medicine, Research Institute of National Cancer Center, Goyang, Korea
| | - Sun Young Kim
- Center for Colorectal Cancer, National Cancer Center, Goyang, Korea
| | - Hyun Yang Yeo
- Precision Medicine Branch, Division of Precision Medicine, Research Institute of National Cancer Center, Goyang, Korea
| | - Ji Yeon Baek
- Center for Colorectal Cancer, National Cancer Center, Goyang, Korea; Translational Research Branch, Division of Translational Science, Research Institute of National Cancer Center, Goyang, Korea
| | - Moon Ki Choi
- Center for Colorectal Cancer, National Cancer Center, Goyang, Korea
| | - Kyung Hae Jung
- Center for Colorectal Cancer, National Cancer Center, Goyang, Korea
| | - Seung Myung Dong
- Molecular Epidemiology Branch, Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Prevention, Research Institute of National Cancer Center, Goyang, Korea.
| | - Hee Jin Chang
- Center for Colorectal Cancer, National Cancer Center, Goyang, Korea; Precision Medicine Branch, Division of Precision Medicine, Research Institute of National Cancer Center, Goyang, Korea.
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Kiyuna T, Tome Y, Murakami T, Miyake K, Igarashi K, Kawaguchi K, Oshiro H, Higuchi T, Miyake M, Sugisawa N, Zhang Z, Razmjooei S, Wangsiricharoen S, Chmielowski B, Nelson SD, Russell TA, Dry SM, Li Y, Eckardt MA, Singh AS, Chawla S, Kanaya F, Eilber FC, Singh SR, Zhao M, Hoffman RM. A combination of irinotecan/cisplatinum and irinotecan/temozolomide or tumor-targeting Salmonella typhimurium A1-R arrest doxorubicin- and temozolomide-resistant myxofibrosarcoma in a PDOX mouse model. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 2018; 505:733-739. [PMID: 30292411 DOI: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2018.09.106] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/06/2018] [Accepted: 09/16/2018] [Indexed: 12/22/2022]
Abstract
Myxofibrosarcoma (MFS) is the most common sarcomas in elderly patients and is either chemo-resistant or recurs with metastasis after chemotherapy. This recalcitrant cancer in need of improved treatment. We have established a patient-derived orthotopic xenograft (PDOX) of MFS. The MFS PDOX model was established in the biceps femoris of nude mice and randomized into 7 groups of 7 mice each: control; doxorubicin (DOX); pazopanib (PAZ); temozolomide (TEM); Irinotecan (IRN); IRN combined with TEM; IRN combined with cisplatinum (CDDP) and Salmonella typhimurium A1-R (S. typhimurium A1-R). Treatment was evaluated by relative tumor volume and relative body weight. The MFS PDOX models were DOX, PAZ, and TEM resistant. IRN combined with TEM and IRN combined with CDDP were most effective on the MFS PDOX. S. typhimurium A1-R arrested the MFS PDOX tumor. There was no significant body weight loss in any group. The present study suggests that the combination of IRN with either TEM or CDDP, and S. typhimurium have clinical potential for MFS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tasuku Kiyuna
- AntiCancer Inc, San Diego, CA, USA; Department of Surgery, University of California, San Diego, CA, USA; Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, University of the Ryukyus, Okinawa, Japan
| | - Yasunori Tome
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, University of the Ryukyus, Okinawa, Japan.
| | - Takashi Murakami
- AntiCancer Inc, San Diego, CA, USA; Department of Surgery, University of California, San Diego, CA, USA
| | - Kentaro Miyake
- AntiCancer Inc, San Diego, CA, USA; Department of Surgery, University of California, San Diego, CA, USA
| | - Kentaro Igarashi
- AntiCancer Inc, San Diego, CA, USA; Department of Surgery, University of California, San Diego, CA, USA
| | - Kei Kawaguchi
- AntiCancer Inc, San Diego, CA, USA; Department of Surgery, University of California, San Diego, CA, USA
| | - Hiromichi Oshiro
- AntiCancer Inc, San Diego, CA, USA; Department of Surgery, University of California, San Diego, CA, USA
| | - Takashi Higuchi
- AntiCancer Inc, San Diego, CA, USA; Department of Surgery, University of California, San Diego, CA, USA
| | - Masuyo Miyake
- AntiCancer Inc, San Diego, CA, USA; Department of Surgery, University of California, San Diego, CA, USA
| | - Norihiko Sugisawa
- AntiCancer Inc, San Diego, CA, USA; Department of Surgery, University of California, San Diego, CA, USA
| | - Zhiying Zhang
- AntiCancer Inc, San Diego, CA, USA; Department of Surgery, University of California, San Diego, CA, USA
| | | | | | | | - Scott D Nelson
- Department of Pathology, University of California, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Tara A Russell
- Division of Surgical Oncology, University of California, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Sarah M Dry
- Department of Pathology, University of California, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Yunfeng Li
- Department of Pathology, University of California, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Mark A Eckardt
- Department of Surgery, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA
| | - Arun S Singh
- Div. of Hematology-Oncology, University of California, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Sant Chawla
- Sarcoma Oncology Center, Santa Monica, CA, USA.
| | - Fuminori Kanaya
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, University of the Ryukyus, Okinawa, Japan
| | - Fritz C Eilber
- Division of Surgical Oncology, University of California, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
| | - Shree Ram Singh
- Basic Research Laboratory, National Cancer Institute, Frederick, MD, USA.
| | | | - Robert M Hoffman
- AntiCancer Inc, San Diego, CA, USA; Department of Surgery, University of California, San Diego, CA, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Sartore-Bianchi A, Siena S. The right chance for temozolomide in metastatic colorectal cancer? Ann Oncol 2018; 29:1618-1619. [DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mdy223] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/14/2022] Open
|