1
|
Van Meerhaeghe T, Murakami N, Le Moine A, Brouard S, Sprangers B, Degauque N. Fine-tuning tumor- and allo-immunity: advances in the use of immune checkpoint inhibitors in kidney transplant recipients. Clin Kidney J 2024; 17:sfae061. [PMID: 38606169 PMCID: PMC11008728 DOI: 10.1093/ckj/sfae061] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/19/2023] [Indexed: 04/13/2024] Open
Abstract
Cancer is a common complication after kidney transplantation. Kidney transplant recipients (KTR) have a 2- to 4-fold higher risk of developing cancer compared to the general population and post-transplant malignancy is the third most common cause of death in KTR. Moreover, it is well known that certain cancer types are overrepresented after transplantation, especially non-melanoma skin cancer. Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) have revolutionized the treatment of cancer, with remarkable survival benefit in a subgroup of patients. ICI are monoclonal antibodies that block the binding of specific co-inhibitory signaling molecules. Cytotoxic T lymphocyte-associated antigen-4 (CTLA-4), programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1), and its ligand programmed cell death ligand 1 (PD-L1) are the main targets of ICI. Solid organ transplant recipients (SOTR) have been excluded from clinical trials owing to concerns about tumor response, allo-immunity, and risk of transplant rejection. Indeed, graft rejection has been estimated as high as 48% and represents an emerging problem. The underlying mechanisms of organ rejection in the context of treatment with ICI are poorly understood. The search for restricted antitumoral responses without graft rejection is of paramount importance. This review summarizes the current knowledge of the use of ICI in KTR, the potential mechanisms involved in kidney graft rejection during ICI treatment, potential biomarkers of rejection, and how to deal with rejection in clinical practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tess Van Meerhaeghe
- Departement of Nephrology, Hôpital Erasme, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium
- Nantes Université, INSERM, Center for Research in Transplantation and Translational Immunology (CR2TI), UMR 1064, Nantes, France
| | - Naoka Murakami
- Division of Renal Medicine, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, USA
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, USA
| | - Alain Le Moine
- Departement of Nephrology, Hôpital Erasme, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Sophie Brouard
- Nantes Université, INSERM, Center for Research in Transplantation and Translational Immunology (CR2TI), UMR 1064, Nantes, France
| | - Ben Sprangers
- Biomedical Research Institute, Department of Immunology and Infection, UHasselt, Diepenbeek, Belgium
- Department of Nephrology, Ziekenhuis Oost Limburg, Genk, Belgium
| | - Nicolas Degauque
- Nantes Université, INSERM, Center for Research in Transplantation and Translational Immunology (CR2TI), UMR 1064, Nantes, France
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Wong G, Lim WH. Prior cancer history and suitability for kidney transplantation. Clin Kidney J 2023; 16:1908-1916. [PMID: 37915927 PMCID: PMC10616492 DOI: 10.1093/ckj/sfad141] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/06/2023] [Indexed: 11/03/2023] Open
Abstract
Kidney transplantation is the optimal treatment for most patients with kidney failure. For patients with a prior history of treated cancers, listing and transplant eligibility decisions are complex. Patients and health professionals are obliged to consider the time-periods between cancer cure and transplantation, the risk of cancer recurrence under the influence of immunosuppression and anti-cancer treatment options if the disease recurs. Cancer recurrence is associated with a high mortality rate, thus potentially reduces the projected survival benefit of transplantation, and dampens the utility of scarce organs. In view of the uncertain risk of harms, clinicians may consider transplantation for candidates with prior cancer history only after an extended period of cancer-free interval, as the fear of disease recurrence and shortened life expectancy may outweigh the benefits of receiving a kidney transplant compared with dialysis. Over the past decade, the evolution of novel anti-cancer therapies coupled with improved understanding of cancer genomics have led to considerable improvement in cancer-free survival. It is therefore justifiable to make individualized transplant suitability decisions based the joint effects of cancer biology, available therapeutic options and prognostic covariates on clinical outcomes. In this review, we first summarized the cancer epidemiology in kidney transplant recipients. We then explored how the probability of cancer cure, risk of recurrence and outcomes in candidates with a prior cancer history may influence the decisions to transplant. Finally, the role of shared decision-making between health professionals and patients regarding the optimal management options, and considerations of patients' preferences and values are discussed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Germaine Wong
- Sydney School of Public Health, University of Sydney, Camperdown, NSW, Australia
- Centre for Kidney Research, Kids Research Institute, The Children's Hospital at Westmead, NSW, Sydney, Australia
- Centre for Kidney and Transplantation Research, Westmead Hospital, NSW, Sydney, Australia
| | - Wai H Lim
- Department of Renal and Transplantation Medicine, Sir Charles Gairdner Hospital, WA, Perth, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Ros J, Baraibar I, Saoudi N, Rodriguez M, Salvà F, Tabernero J, Élez E. Immunotherapy for Colorectal Cancer with High Microsatellite Instability: The Ongoing Search for Biomarkers. Cancers (Basel) 2023; 15:4245. [PMID: 37686520 PMCID: PMC10486610 DOI: 10.3390/cancers15174245] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/28/2023] [Revised: 08/22/2023] [Accepted: 08/23/2023] [Indexed: 09/10/2023] Open
Abstract
Microsatellite instability (MSI) is a biological condition associated with inflamed tumors, high tumor mutational burden (TMB), and responses to immune checkpoint inhibitors. In colorectal cancer (CRC), MSI tumors are found in 5% of patients in the metastatic setting and 15% in early-stage disease. Following the impressive clinical activity of immune checkpoint inhibitors in the metastatic setting, associated with deep and long-lasting responses, the development of immune checkpoint inhibitors has expanded to early-stage disease. Several phase II trials have demonstrated a high rate of pathological complete responses, with some patients even spared from surgery. However, in both settings, not all patients respond and some responses are short, emphasizing the importance of the ongoing search for accurate biomarkers. While various biomarkers of response have been evaluated in the context of MSI CRC, including B2M and JAK1/2 mutations, TMB, WNT pathway mutations, and Lynch syndrome, with mixed results, liver metastases have been associated with a lack of activity in such strategies. To improve patient selection and treatment outcomes, further research is required to identify additional biomarkers and refine existing ones. This will allow for the development of personalized treatment approaches and the integration of novel therapeutic strategies for MSI CRC patients with liver metastases.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Javier Ros
- Medical Oncology Department, Vall d’Hebron University Hospital, 08035 Barcelona, Spain; (J.R.); (I.B.); (N.S.); (M.R.); (F.S.); (J.T.)
- Vall d’Hebron Institute of Oncology, 08035 Barcelona, Spain
| | - Iosune Baraibar
- Medical Oncology Department, Vall d’Hebron University Hospital, 08035 Barcelona, Spain; (J.R.); (I.B.); (N.S.); (M.R.); (F.S.); (J.T.)
- Vall d’Hebron Institute of Oncology, 08035 Barcelona, Spain
| | - Nadia Saoudi
- Medical Oncology Department, Vall d’Hebron University Hospital, 08035 Barcelona, Spain; (J.R.); (I.B.); (N.S.); (M.R.); (F.S.); (J.T.)
- Vall d’Hebron Institute of Oncology, 08035 Barcelona, Spain
| | - Marta Rodriguez
- Medical Oncology Department, Vall d’Hebron University Hospital, 08035 Barcelona, Spain; (J.R.); (I.B.); (N.S.); (M.R.); (F.S.); (J.T.)
- Vall d’Hebron Institute of Oncology, 08035 Barcelona, Spain
| | - Francesc Salvà
- Medical Oncology Department, Vall d’Hebron University Hospital, 08035 Barcelona, Spain; (J.R.); (I.B.); (N.S.); (M.R.); (F.S.); (J.T.)
- Vall d’Hebron Institute of Oncology, 08035 Barcelona, Spain
| | - Josep Tabernero
- Medical Oncology Department, Vall d’Hebron University Hospital, 08035 Barcelona, Spain; (J.R.); (I.B.); (N.S.); (M.R.); (F.S.); (J.T.)
- Vall d’Hebron Institute of Oncology, 08035 Barcelona, Spain
| | - Elena Élez
- Medical Oncology Department, Vall d’Hebron University Hospital, 08035 Barcelona, Spain; (J.R.); (I.B.); (N.S.); (M.R.); (F.S.); (J.T.)
- Vall d’Hebron Institute of Oncology, 08035 Barcelona, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Ros J, Salva F, Dopazo C, López D, Saoudi N, Baraibar I, Charco R, Tabernero J, Elez E. Liver transplantation in metastatic colorectal cancer: are we ready for it? Br J Cancer 2023; 128:1797-1806. [PMID: 36879000 PMCID: PMC10147684 DOI: 10.1038/s41416-023-02213-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/01/2022] [Revised: 02/10/2023] [Accepted: 02/17/2023] [Indexed: 03/08/2023] Open
Abstract
Colorectal cancer (CRC) is a prevalent disease worldwide, with more than 50% of patients developing metastases to the liver. Five-year overall survival remains modest among patients with metastatic CRC (mCRC) treated with conventional therapies however, liver transplantation in a highly selected population can improve clinical outcomes with an impressive 5-year overall survival of 83%. Despite liver transplantation appearing to be a promising therapeutical option for well-selected patients with mCRC with the liver-limited disease, these data come from small monocentric trials which included a heterogeneous population. Currently, several clinical trials are evaluating liver transplantation in this scenario, aiming for a more accurate patient selection by integrating liquid biopsy, tissue profiling, and nuclear medicine to the already known clinical biomarkers that eventually may lead to a survival improvement. In this paper, the clinical outcomes and inclusion criteria from the most relevant clinical trials and clinical series involving liver transplantation in patients with liver-limited disease colorectal cancer are reviewed as well as the trials currently recruiting.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Javier Ros
- Department of Medical Oncology, Vall d'Hebron Institute of Oncology (VHIO), 08035, Barcelona, Spain.
- Medical Oncology, Department of Precision Medicine, Università degli Studi della Campania Luigi Vanvitelli, 80131, Naples, Italy.
| | - Francesc Salva
- Department of Medical Oncology, Vall d'Hebron Institute of Oncology (VHIO), 08035, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Cristina Dopazo
- Department of HPB Surgery and Transplants, Vall d'Hebron Hospital Universitari, Vall d'Hebron Institut de Recerca (VHIR), Vall d'Hebron Barcelona Hospital Campus, Universitat Autónoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Daniel López
- Department of Medical Oncology, Vall d'Hebron Institute of Oncology (VHIO), 08035, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Nadia Saoudi
- Department of Medical Oncology, Vall d'Hebron Institute of Oncology (VHIO), 08035, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Iosune Baraibar
- Department of Medical Oncology, Vall d'Hebron Institute of Oncology (VHIO), 08035, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Ramon Charco
- Department of HPB Surgery and Transplants, Vall d'Hebron Hospital Universitari, Vall d'Hebron Institut de Recerca (VHIR), Vall d'Hebron Barcelona Hospital Campus, Universitat Autónoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Josep Tabernero
- Department of Medical Oncology, Vall d'Hebron Institute of Oncology (VHIO), 08035, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Elena Elez
- Department of Medical Oncology, Vall d'Hebron Institute of Oncology (VHIO), 08035, Barcelona, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Lominadze Z, Hill K, Shaik MR, Canakis JP, Bourmaf M, Adams-Mardi C, Abutaleb A, Mishra L, Shetty K. Immunotherapy for Hepatocellular Carcinoma in the Setting of Liver Transplantation: A Review. Int J Mol Sci 2023; 24:ijms24032358. [PMID: 36768686 PMCID: PMC9917203 DOI: 10.3390/ijms24032358] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/01/2022] [Revised: 01/07/2023] [Accepted: 01/18/2023] [Indexed: 01/27/2023] Open
Abstract
The emerging field of immuno-oncology has brought exciting developments in the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). It has also raised urgent questions about the role of immunotherapy in the setting of liver transplantation, both before and after transplant. A growing body of evidence points to the safety and efficacy of immunotherapeutic agents as potential adjuncts for successful down-staging of advanced HCCs to allow successful transplant in carefully selected patients. For patients with recurrent HCC post-transplant, immunotherapy has a limited, yet growing role. In this review, we describe optimal regimens in the setting of liver transplantation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zurabi Lominadze
- Division of Gastroenterology & Hepatology, Department of Medicine, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 21201, USA
- Correspondence:
| | - Kareen Hill
- Department of Medicine, University of Maryland Medical Center, Baltimore, MD 21201, USA
| | - Mohammed Rifat Shaik
- Department of Medicine, University of Maryland Medical Center Midtown Campus, Baltimore, MD 21201, USA
| | - Justin P. Canakis
- Department of Medicine, George Washington University School of Medicine and Health Sciences, Washington, DC 20037, USA
| | - Mohammad Bourmaf
- Department of Medicine, University of Maryland Medical Center, Baltimore, MD 21201, USA
| | - Cyrus Adams-Mardi
- Department of Medicine, George Washington University School of Medicine and Health Sciences, Washington, DC 20037, USA
| | - Ameer Abutaleb
- Department of Surgery, George Washington University School of Medicine and Health Sciences, Washington, DC 20037, USA
| | - Lopa Mishra
- Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, Feinstein Institutes for Medical Research, Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Northwell Health, Manhasset, NY 11030, USA
| | - Kirti Shetty
- Division of Gastroenterology & Hepatology, Department of Medicine, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 21201, USA
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
The Current Treatment Landscape of Cutaneous Squamous Cell Carcinoma. Am J Clin Dermatol 2023; 24:25-40. [PMID: 36512176 DOI: 10.1007/s40257-022-00742-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 11/09/2022] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
Non-melanoma skin cancers (NMSCs) are the most common form of skin cancer worldwide. The global incidence of cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma (CSCC) is rising, with an estimated 2.4 million cases diagnosed in 2019. Chronic exposure to ultraviolet (UV) radiation is a major risk factor for developing CSCC. Most early-stage CSCCs are treated successfully with surgery or radiotherapy; however, locally advanced or metastatic disease can be associated with significant morbidity or mortality. Recently, the treatment paradigm for advanced CSCC has been revolutionised by the introduction of immunotherapy, which can achieve a response rate of approximately 50% with durable cancer control, and significant improvement in quality of life. With the regulatory approval of programmed death-1 (PD-1)-targeting drugs since 2018, immunotherapy is now recognised as the standard of care for first-line systemic therapy in advanced or metastatic CSCC.
Collapse
|
7
|
Van Meerhaeghe T, Baurain J, Bechter O, Orte Cano C, Del Marmol V, Devresse A, Doubel P, Hanssens M, Hellemans R, Lienard D, Rutten A, Sprangers B, Le Moine A, Aspeslagh S. Cemiplimab for advanced cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma in kidney transplant recipients. FRONTIERS IN NEPHROLOGY 2022; 2:1041819. [PMID: 37675002 PMCID: PMC10479765 DOI: 10.3389/fneph.2022.1041819] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/11/2022] [Accepted: 10/06/2022] [Indexed: 09/08/2023]
Abstract
Background Kidney transplant recipients (KTR) are at increased risk of cancer due to chronic immunosuppression. Non-melanoma skin cancer has an excess risk of approximately 250 times higher than the general population. Moreover, in solid organ transplant recipients (SOTR) these cancers have a more aggressive behavior, with an increased risk of metastasis and death. Cemiplimab, a human monoclonal IgG4 antibody against programmed cell death (PD-1) has shown considerable clinical activity in metastatic and locally advanced cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma (cSCC) in patients for whom no widely accepted standard of care exists. Cemiplimab has therefore been approved since 2018 for the treatment of advanced cSCC. However, data regarding the use of cemiplimab in SOTR and particularly in KTR are scarce and based on published case reports and small case series. In this study, we report on the real-life outcome of cemiplimab use in a Belgian cohort of seven KTR suffering from advanced cSCC. Objective To report on the overall response rate (ORR) and safety of cemiplimab in KTR in Belgium. Results Seven patients suffering from advanced cSCC, treated with cemiplimab, between 2018 and 2022, in Belgium were identified. Three patients were on corticosteroid monotherapy, one patient on tacrolimus monotherapy and three patients were on at least 2 immunosuppressants at start of cemiplimab. The ORR was 42.8%, stable disease was seen in 14.3% and progressive disease was found in 42.8% of the patients, respectively. The median administered number of cycles was 12, interquartile range (IQR) 25-75 [3.5 - 13.5]. All patients were treated with surgery before administration of cemiplimab, 71.4% received additional radiotherapy and only 1 patient was treated with chemotherapy prior to receiving cemiplimab. Biopsy-proven acute renal allograft rejection was observed in one patient, who eventually lost his graft function but showed a complete tumor response to treatment. Low grade skin toxicity was seen in one patient of the cohort. Conclusion The present case series shows that the use of cemiplimab in KTR with advanced cSCC who failed to respond to previous surgery, chemo - and/or radiotherapy treatment is associated with an ORR of 42.8% with minimal risk of graft rejection (14.3%) and good tolerance.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- T. Van Meerhaeghe
- Department of Nephrology, Hôpital Erasme – Université Libre de Bruxelles (ULB), Brussels, Belgium
| | - J.F. Baurain
- Department of Oncology, Clinique Universitaire Saint-Luc – Université Catholique de Louvain (UCLouvain), Brussels, Belgium
| | - O. Bechter
- Department of Oncology, Universitair Ziekenhuis (UZ) Leuven – Katholieke Universiteit Leuven (KUL), Leuven, Belgium
| | - C. Orte Cano
- Department of Dermatology, Hôpital Erasme – Université Libre de Bruxelles (ULB), Brussels, Belgium
| | - V. Del Marmol
- Department of Dermatology, Hôpital Erasme – Université Libre de Bruxelles (ULB), Brussels, Belgium
| | - A. Devresse
- Department of Nephrology, Clinique Universitaire Saint-Luc – Université Catholique de Louvain (UCLouvain), Brussels, Belgium
| | - P. Doubel
- Department of Nephrology, Academisch Ziekenhuis (AZ) Groeninge, Kortrijk, Belgium
| | - M. Hanssens
- Department of Oncology, Academisch Ziekenhuis (AZ) Groeninge, Kortrijk, Belgium
| | - R. Hellemans
- Departement of Nephrology, Universitair Ziekenhuis (UZ) Antwerpen, Antwerpen, Belgium
| | - D. Lienard
- Department of Dermatology, Hôpital Erasme – Université Libre de Bruxelles (ULB), Brussels, Belgium
| | - A. Rutten
- Department of Oncology, GasthuisZuster, Antwerpen, Belgium
| | - B. Sprangers
- Department of Nephrology, Universitair Ziekenhuis (UZ) Leuven – Katholieke Universiteit Leuven (KUL), Leuven, Belgium
| | - A. Le Moine
- Department of Nephrology, Hôpital Erasme – Université Libre de Bruxelles (ULB), Brussels, Belgium
| | - S. Aspeslagh
- Department of Oncology, Universitair Ziekenhuis (UZ) Brussel – Vrije Universiteit Brussel (VUB), Brussels, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Okwundu N, Grossman D, Hu-Lieskovan S, Grossmann KF, Swami U. The dark side of immunotherapy. ANNALS OF TRANSLATIONAL MEDICINE 2021; 9:1041. [PMID: 34277841 PMCID: PMC8267325 DOI: 10.21037/atm-20-4750] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/16/2020] [Accepted: 10/28/2020] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
Immunotherapy has broadened the therapeutic scope and response for many cancer patients with drugs that are generally of higher efficacy and less toxicity than prior therapies. Multiple classes of immunotherapies such as targeted antibodies and immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI), cell-based immunotherapies, immunomodulators, vaccines, and oncolytic viruses have been developed to help the immune system target and destroy malignant tumors. ICI targeting programmed cell death protein-1 (PD-1) or its ligand (PD-L1) are among the most effective immunotherapy agents and are a major focus of current investigations. They have received approval for at least 16 different tumor types as well as for unresectable or metastatic tumors with microsatellite instability-high (MSI-H) or mismatch repair deficiency or with high tumor mutational burden (defined as ≥10 mutations/megabase). However, it is important to recognize that immunotherapy may be associated with significant adverse events. To summarize these events, we conducted a PubMed and Google Scholar database search through April 2020 for manuscripts evaluating treatment-related adverse events and knowledge gaps associated with the use of immunotherapy. Reviewed topics include immune-related adverse events (irAEs), toxicities on combining immunotherapy with other agents, disease reactivation such as tuberculosis (TB) and sarcoid-like granulomatosis, tumor hyperprogression (HPD), financial toxicity, challenges in special patient populations such as solid organ transplant recipients and those with auto-immune diseases. We also reviewed reports of worse or even lethal outcomes compared to other oncologic therapies in certain scenarios and summarized biomarkers predicting adverse events.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nwanneka Okwundu
- Huntsman Cancer Institute, University of Utah Health Sciences Center, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
| | - Douglas Grossman
- Huntsman Cancer Institute, University of Utah Health Sciences Center, Salt Lake City, UT, USA.,Department of Dermatology, University of Utah Health Sciences Center, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
| | - Siwen Hu-Lieskovan
- Huntsman Cancer Institute, University of Utah Health Sciences Center, Salt Lake City, UT, USA.,Department of Medicine, University of Utah Health Sciences Center, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
| | - Kenneth F Grossmann
- Huntsman Cancer Institute, University of Utah Health Sciences Center, Salt Lake City, UT, USA.,Department of Medicine, University of Utah Health Sciences Center, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
| | - Umang Swami
- Huntsman Cancer Institute, University of Utah Health Sciences Center, Salt Lake City, UT, USA.,Department of Medicine, University of Utah Health Sciences Center, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Yetmar ZA, Beam E, O’Horo JC, Ganesh R, Bierle DM, Brumble L, Seville MT, Razonable RR. Monoclonal Antibody Therapy for COVID-19 in Solid Organ Transplant Recipients. Open Forum Infect Dis 2021; 8:ofab255. [PMID: 34631921 PMCID: PMC8494079 DOI: 10.1093/ofid/ofab255] [Citation(s) in RCA: 34] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/18/2021] [Accepted: 05/13/2021] [Indexed: 01/29/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Bamlanivimab and casirivimab-imdevimab are authorized for emergency use treatment of mild to moderate coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) in patients at high risk for developing severe disease or hospitalization. Their safety and efficacy have not been specifically evaluated in solid organ transplant recipients. METHODS We retrospectively reviewed solid organ transplant recipients who received monoclonal antibody infusion for COVID-19 at Mayo Clinic sites through January 23, 2021. Outcomes included emergency department visit, hospitalization, mortality, and allograft rejection. RESULTS Seventy-three patients were treated, most commonly with bamlanivimab (75.3%). The median age was 59 years, 63% were male, and the median Charlson comorbidity index was 5. Transplant type included 41 kidney (56.2%), 13 liver (17.8%), 11 heart (15.1%), 4 kidney-pancreas (5.5%), 2 lung (2.7%), 1 heart-liver, and 1 pancreas. Eleven (15.1%) patients had an emergency department visit within 28 days of infusion, including 9 (12.3%) who were hospitalized for a median of 4 days. One patient required intensive care unit admission for a nonrespiratory complication. No patients required mechanical ventilation, died, or experienced rejection. Ten adverse events occurred, with 1 seeking medical evaluation. Hypertension was associated with hospital admission (P < .05), while other baseline characteristics were similar. The median time from symptom onset to antibody administration was 4 days in nonhospitalized patients compared with 6 days among hospitalized patients (P < .05). CONCLUSIONS Monoclonal antibody treatment has favorable outcomes with minimal adverse effects in solid organ transplant recipients with mild to moderate COVID-19. Earlier administration of monoclonal antibody therapy appears to be more efficacious.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zachary A Yetmar
- Division of Infectious Diseases, Mayo
Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| | - Elena Beam
- Division of Infectious Diseases, Mayo
Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| | - John C O’Horo
- Division of Infectious Diseases, Mayo
Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
- Divison of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Mayo
Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| | - Ravindra Ganesh
- Division of General Internal Medicine, Mayo
Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| | - Dennis M Bierle
- Division of General Internal Medicine, Mayo
Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| | - Lisa Brumble
- Division of Infectious Diseases, Mayo
Clinic, Jacksonville, Florida, USA
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
10
|
Stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) for the treatment of primary lung cancer in recipients of lung transplant. Radiol Oncol 2020; 54:227-232. [PMID: 32310152 PMCID: PMC7276642 DOI: 10.2478/raon-2020-0022] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/21/2019] [Accepted: 02/29/2020] [Indexed: 12/25/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Lung transplantation is a life-saving treatment for patients with end stage lung disease. There may be a higher incidence of lung cancer in lung transplant recipients, and these cancers tend to be diagnosed at a more advanced stage. There is very little data on the safety and efficacy of stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) for lesions in the native lung in lung-transplant recipients. Patients and methods A retrospective chart review of all patients who have undergone lung transplantation and were treated with SBRT for lung cancer in the native lung in the Davidoff Cancer Center was performed. Results Four patients who were treated with SBRT to a total of 5 lesions were included. Two patients were treated without histological confirmation of malignancy. All cases were discussed in a multidisciplinary tumor board before being referred for radiotherapy. Standard SBRT dosing was used. Responses were assessed by imaging. Three lesions exhibited a complete response and two lesions had a partial response. The patients who had partial responses developed distant metastases and died shortly. No patient developed measurable toxicity. Conclusions SBRT is effective and safe for the management of lung cancer in lung-transplant patients. Standard dose and fractionation can be used.
Collapse
|
11
|
Gaudy-Marqueste C. Quoi de neuf en oncodermatologie ? Ann Dermatol Venereol 2019; 146:12S39-12S45. [DOI: 10.1016/s0151-9638(20)30105-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
|