The Risk of Skin Necrosis Following Hyaluronic Acid Filler Injection in Patients With a History of Cosmetic Rhinoplasty

A narrative-style review of non-surgical rhinoplasty: Indications, outcomes, and limitations

The aim of this narrative-style review was to evaluate non-surgical rhinoplasty in terms of indications, outcomes, and limitations. Both 'PubMed' and 'Science Direct' were reviewed by all authors, in order to reach consensus with regard to the chosen studies. Studies published from 1980 to 2023 were searched using the key terms "non-surgical rhinoplasty", "dermal filler", "thread lifting", and "botulinum toxin", and relevant papers were selected. Non-surgical rhinoplasty refers to the use of injectable temporary fillers to augment selected areas of the nose, in order to achieve improved appearance or function in select patients. It includes the use of dermal fillers, thread lifting, and botulinum toxin injections. The perfect dermal filler would be inexpensive, safe, painless to inject, hypoallergenic, and long lasting. In addition, it should produce consistent and predictable results, feel natural under the skin, take little time to inject, be ready to use, exert no downtime on the patient, and have a low risk of complications. Regions of the nose treated with filler injections include the frontonasal angle, dorsum, nasolabial angle, and columella. Thread lifting and botulinum toxin injection are the other methods of non-surgical rhinoplasty. Dermal fillers, thread lifting, and botulinum toxin injections can be used as non-surgical rhinoplasty. Dermal fillers and botulinum neurotoxin can be used alongside each other to allow minimally invasive resculpting of the nasal region and midface, compensating for a reduction in tissue volume and the formation of rhytides.

Subcutaneous injection of hyaluronic acid leading to emboliom and recanalization process monitored in real time by three-dimensional photoacoustic imaging

This study describes a method for real-time examination of the microvascular system based on the three-dimensional photoacoustic imaging system to prevent arterial complications, especially vascular embolism, during hyaluronic acid (HA) injections. Chicken embryos were used to simulate the superficial blood vessels of human skin, and then the target area was imaged by the photoacoustic imaging system for three-dimensional vascular imaging, and then the syringe and blood vessels were monitored, and the syringe angle and penetration depth were adjusted in time using an injection device to avoid puncturing the arterial vasculature and clogging the blood vessels. HA was then injected into smaller vessels on the dorsum of the tongue in mice and into thicker vessels on the dorsal portion of the tongue in rats to mimic embolization, and the post-operative recovery was reflected by the changes in the pixel dots of the extracted part of the blocked blood vessels, and it was observed that the blood flow in the area of the fine vessels was restored in about 3 days, whereas blood flow in the area of the large vessels was restored in only about 1 h. The method presented in this paper allows precise guidance of injectable filler HA, which has good application prospects in improving the safety of injection micro-plastic surgery and reducing the experience requirements for medical personnel.

The Use of Hyaluronic Acid in Non-surgical Rhinoplasty: A Systematic Review of Complications, Clinical, and Patient-Reported Outcomes

INTRODUCTION

In cosmetic practices, non-surgical rhinoplasty using filler injections has become increasingly common. Nevertheless, the outcome and overall complications have not been studied as a systematic review in the literature. This study provides a high-quality systematic review of studies reporting clinical and patient-reported outcomes following non-surgical rhinoplasty with hyaluronic acid (HA) to further guide practitioners.

METHODS

This systematic review was conducted in accordance with PRISMA guidelines and was registered in PROSPERO. The search was conducted using MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane. The literature retrieval was conducted by three independent reviewers, and the remaining articles were screened by two independent reviewers. The quality of included articles was assessed using the MINORS and methodological quality and synthesis of case series and case reports tools.

RESULTS

A total of 874 publications were found based on the search criteria. A total of 3928 patients were reviewed for this systematic review from 23 full-text articles. For non-surgical rhinoplasty, Juvéderm ultra was the most commonly used HA filler. The nasal tip was most commonly injected (13 studies), followed by the columella (12 studies). Nasal hump deformities are the most common reason for non-surgical rhinoplasty. All studies showed high patient satisfaction. Among all patients reviewed, eight developed major complications.

CONCLUSION

Non-surgical rhinoplasty performed with HA has minimal side effects and a short recovery period. Furthermore, non-surgical rhinoplasty with HA results in high satisfaction. To strengthen the presently available evidence, further well-designed RCTs are needed.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE III

This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors https://www.springer.com/00266.

Post-rhinoplasty complications with previous hyaluronic acid injection history: Cerebral infarction and vision loss

BACKGROUND

Rhinoplasty is becoming increasingly frequent as the pursuit of aesthetics by people accelerates. In recent years, the proportion of people opting for rhinoplasty injections has gradually increased. This has led to numerous reports citing catastrophic postoperative complications such as skin necrosis, cerebral infarction, and visual impairment.

AIM

The aim of our report is to discuss the possible etiological factors for this post-rhinoplasty complication and provides a rationale for HA injection history as a risk factor in rhinoplasty.

METHODS

We report a rare case that received nasal HA injections in the past without any untoward incident. She opted for a second rhinoplasty 2 years after her initial nasal HA injections. This second intervention led to post-injection loss of vision in one eye and cerebral infarction. Following clinical and radiological examination, digital subtraction angiography (DSA) and superselective intra-arterial thrombolysis were performed.

RESULTS

The patient did not develop disuse exotropia or ocular atrophy, but the left eye remained without light perception, which implies that intra-arterial thrombolytic therapy may be a positive and effective method to maintain the normal appearance of the eye.

CONCLUSION

It is advisable for patient safety to maintain a long interval of time between hyaluronidase injection and repeat rhinoplasty. Clinicians should become familiar with the anatomical peculiarities of the patient and be gentle during the rhinoplasty procedure.

Vascular complications with necrotic lesions following filler injections: Literature systematic review

INTRODUCTION

Although the related risk of vascular necrosis due to filler injection is low, the outcomes can be severe when they occur. This systematic review aims to report the occurrence and treatment of vascular necrosis due to filler injection.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The systematic review was performed according to PRISMA guidelines.

RESULTS

The results showed the most used treatment is a combination of pharmacologic therapy and hyaluronidase application, which is efficacy when applied in the first 4 h. In addition, even though management recommendations are available in literature, proper guidelines are unavailable due to the low number of complications occurrence.

CONCLUSION

Clinical and high-quality studies on treatment and management of filler injection combination are necessary to provide scientific evidence on what to do in case of vascular complication occurrence.

Hyperbaric oxygenation therapy improve recovery in early or late vascular occlusion generates by tissue fillers

INTRODUCTION

Aesthetic medicine is characterized by the efficacy and safety of treatments. Although sometimes adverse events could be occurred, in this case vascular occlusion is the most serious of them. The tissue is deprived of oxygen and there is a possibility of necrosis, so it is necessary to remove the tissue filler and promote oxygenation.

OBJECTIVE

We propose the hyperbaric oxygenation treatment to oxygenate the tissue after vascular occlusion generated by a tissue filler such as Hyaluronic Acid.

RESULTS

We show how hyperbaric oxygenation treatment is an adjuvant therapy after vascular occlusion, improving tissue regeneration and prevent or limit scars or sequelae.

CONCLUSION

Hyperbaric oxygenation treatment is a safe and effective method to treat vascular accident, improving tissue oxygenation in early cases and improving tissue regeneration in cases with necrosis.

Soft Tissue Dermal Filler-Associated Necrosis and Impending Necrosis: A Systematic Review of the Literature

BACKGROUND

Cosmetic soft tissue fillers are a popular minimally invasive procedure. Necrosis is a rare yet devastating complication of soft tissue fillers. To date, the relationship between soft tissue fillers and necrosis has not been fully described.

OBJECTIVE

To systematically compile published cases of soft tissue fillers resulting in necrosis and collect data regarding the injection, treatment, and outcome.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Using PRISMA protocol, a comprehensive search for soft tissue filler necrosis was performed using no time constraints, resulting in 97 articles encompassing 192 cases of soft tissue filler necrosis containing individual-level data.

RESULTS

Of the cases analyzed, 66.1% had progressed to necrosis, whereas 33.9% of patients had impending necrosis. Necrosis most commonly resulted from injection of the nasolabial fold (32.4%, n = 88). The filler material most commonly used was hyaluronic acid (71.9%, n = 138). Hyaluronidase was used most frequently as an initial treatment agent (19.1%, n = 88). Forty-three patients (22.4%) with necrosis had a prior minor procedure or surgery.

CONCLUSION

This systematic review is an extensive overview of necrosis as a complication of soft tissue fillers. It serves as a reference tool for any clinician who injects soft tissue fillers and any provider who encounters soft tissue filler necrosis.

Expert recommendations on the assessment and management of complications due to hyaluronic acid soft tissue filler injections in Asians

BACKGROUND

The use of hyaluronic acid (HA) fillers for medical aesthetic purposes is increasing worldwide. Nonetheless, adverse events do occur because of patient-specific issues, injection technique, or product factors. It would be mandatory to consider cultural and anatomical features of Asians in preventing and managing the complications of HA injections.

METHODS

Literature search of studies looking at current evidence and guidelines on the management of complications following HA filler injections in Asian patients was conducted. This was followed by an expert group discussion that was convened to reach consensus recommendations on the best clinical practices.

RESULTS

The expert panel provided specific recommendations focusing on the safe use of soft tissue fillers in Asian patients, including early identification of adverse events and how to prevent and comprehensively manage these outcomes.

CONCLUSIONS

Here, we provide consensus statements of Asian experts in dermatology, plastic surgery, ophthalmology, and aesthetic medicine mainly focusing on AEs with higher risk for Asians and can be used to guide physicians in treating Asian population.

Vasculature of the Nasal Cartilage Region Related to Filler Injection

BACKGROUND

A filler injection in the nose can be essential but is also dangerous, especially in the nasal cartilage region. To safely and accurately perform a filler injection, surgeons must have detailed knowledge of nasal anatomy.

OBJECTIVES

Associated the vessel branches and the characteristics of different nasal regions to provide suggestions for more suitable injection sites.

METHODS

Fifty specimens underwent computed tomography (CT) after contrast infusion. Qualified specimens were selected for 3D CT reconstruction. Dissection was performed to confirm the accuracy of the CT data.

RESULTS

The branches of arteries with large diameters, the dorsal nasal artery (DNA) and the lateral nasal artery (LNA) were distributed within the superficial musculoaponeurotic system layer. The DNA was seen in only 58% of specimens. The artery crossed the midline over the upper lateral cartilage in 16% of specimens. The LNA was a constant branch that traversed the nasal tip. The LNA crossed the midline to the contralateral side in 18% of patients. We divided the nasal cartilage dorsum into two regions for easy handling: the supratip region (STR) and the nasal tip region (NTR). The branches distributed in the STR mostly originated from the DNA (81.6%, 40/49), while those in the NTR mostly originated from the LNA.

CONCLUSIONS

The vasculature of the nasal cartilage region observed in this study is similar to that observed in previous studies. However, we found that the STR was an advantageous area for filler injection. At the same time, we provided suggestions for more suitable injection methods.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE IV

This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .

Application of Nonsurgical Modalities in Improving Facial Aging

Objective. This review aims to summarize different kinds of applications of minimally invasive surgery in improving facial aging to provide a comprehensive and accurate introduction on the issue of esthetic treatment of facial skin. Overview. In the twentieth century, facial rejuvenation has become a new beauty trend. Facial cosmetology has entered a period of antiaging and rejuvenation therapies and microplastic surgery. The pursuit of beauty has promoted the development of minimally invasive plastic surgery. This review introduces the possible causes of facial aging and its related topics with a focus on facial injectable drugs, such as botulinum toxin, main filler materials (hyaluronic acid, calcium hydroxyapatite, poly L-lactic acid, collagen, autologous fat, and polymethyl methacrylate), and some current antiwrinkle technologies, such as thread lift and radiofrequency rhytidectomy. Conclusions. Despite the difference in mechanisms of action, each technique can address facial aging involving the loss of collagen, displacement and enlargement of fat, and muscle relaxation. Combinations of these treatments can provide patients with reasonable, comprehensive, and personalized treatment plans.

Complications of Nonpermanent Facial Fillers: A Systematic Review

Background:

A variety of complications after injection of nonpermanent fillers for facial rejuvenation have been reported so far. However, to date, the overall complication rate is still a matter of debate. The aim of this study was to perform a systematic review of literature to assess the type and severity of associated complications following injections in different anatomical regions of the face.

Methods:

The entire PubMed/Medline database was screened to identify case reports and clinical studies describing complications that have occurred after injection of nonpermanent fillers in the face. These complications have been reviewed and analyzed according to their occurrence in different anatomical regions of the face.

Results:

Forty-six articles including a total of 164 patients reported on a total of 436 complications during the time period between January 2003 and February 2020. The majority of the complications were reported after injections to the nose and the nasolabial fold (n = 230), the forehead and the eyebrows (n = 53), and the glabellar region (n = 36). Out of 436 complications, 163 have been classified as severe or permanent including skin necrosis (n = 46), loss of vision (n = 35), or encephalitis (n = 1), whereas 273 complications were classified as mild or transient, such as local edema (n = 74), skin erythema (n = 69), and filler migration (n = 2). The most severe complications were observed in treatments of nose, glabella, and forehead.

Conclusions:

Nonpermanent facial fillers are associated with rare but potentially severe complications. Severity and impact of complications depend on the anatomical region of the face and eventually require profound knowledge of facial anatomy.

Tissue Fillers for the Nasolabial Fold Area: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Clinical Trials

Abstract

Tissue fillers injections remain to be one of the most commonly performed cosmetic procedures. The aim of this meta-analysis was to systematize and present available data on the aesthetic outcomes and safety of treating the nasolabial fold area with tissue fillers. We conducted a systematic review of randomized clinical trials that report outcomes concerning treatment of nasolabial fold area with tissue fillers. We searched the MEDLINE/PubMed, ScienceDirect, EMBASE, BIOSIS, SciELO, Scopus, Cochrane Controlled Register of Trials, CNKI and Web of Science databases. Primary outcomes included aesthetic improvement measured using the Wrinkle Severity Rating Scale score and Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale. Secondary outcomes were incidence rates of complications occurring after the procedure. At baseline, the pooled mean WSRS score was 3.23 (95% CI: 3.20–3.26). One month after the procedure, the pooled WSRS score had reached 1.79 (95% CI: 1.74–1.83). After six months it was 2.02 (95% CI: 1.99–2.05) and after 12 months it was 2.46 (95% CI: 2.4–2.52). One month after the procedure, the pooled GAIS score had reached 2.21 (95% CI: 2.14–2.28). After six months, it was 2.32 (95% CI: 2.26–2.37), and after 12 months, it was 1.27 (95% CI: 1.12–1.42). Overall, the pooled incidence of all complications was 0.58 (95% CI: 0.46–0.7). Most common included lumpiness (43%), tenderness (41%), swelling (34%) and bruising (29%). Tissue fillers used for nasolabial fold area treatment allow achieving a satisfying and sustainable improvement. Most common complications include tenderness, lumpiness, swelling, and bruising.

Level of Evidence II

"This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors  www.springer.com/00266."

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00266-021-02439-5.

Hyaluronic Acid Is an Effective Dermal Filler for Lip Augmentation: A Meta-Analysis

Introduction: The lips and the mouth play an indispensable role in vocalization, mastication and face aesthetics. Various noxious factors may alter and destruct the original structure, and appearance of the lips and the anatomical area surrounding the mouth. The application of hyaluronic acid (HA) may serve as a safe method for lip regeneration. Although a number of studies exist for HA effectiveness and safety, its beneficial effect is not well-established. Aim: The present meta-analysis and systematic review was performed to investigate the effectiveness of HA on lip augmentation. We also investigated the types and nature of adverse effects (AEs) of HA application. Methods: We reported our meta-analysis in accordance with the PRISMA Statement. PROSPERO protocol registration: CRD42018102899. We performed the systematic literature search in CENTRAL, Embase, and MEDLINE. Randomized controlled trials, cohort studies, case series and case reports were included. The untransformed proportion (random-effects, DerSimonian-Laird method) of responder rate to HA injection was calculated. For treatment related AEs descriptive statistics were used. Results: The systematic literature search yielded 32 eligible records for descriptive statistics and 10 records for quantitative synthesis. The results indicated that the overall estimate of responders (percentage of subjects with increased lip fullness by one point or higher) was 91% (ES = 0.91, 95% CI:0.85-0.96) 2 months after injection. The rate of responders was 74% (ES = 0.74, 95% CI:0.66-0.82) and 46% (ES = 0.46, 95% CI:0.28-0.65) after 6 and 12 months, respectively. We included 1,496 participants for estimating the event rates of AEs. The most frequent treatment-related AEs were tenderness (88.8%), injection site swelling (74.3%) and bruising (39.5%). Rare AEs included foreign body granulomas (0.6%), herpes labialis (0.6%) and angioedema (0.3%). Conclusion: Our meta-analysis revealed that lip augmentation with injectable HA is an efficient method for increasing lip fullness for at least up to 6 months after augmentation. Moreover, we found that most AEs of HA treatment were mild or moderate, but a small number of serious adverse effects were also found. In conclusion, further well-designed RCTs are still needed to make the presently available evidence stronger.

Revisit, Reform, and Redesign: A Novel Dissection Approach for Demonstrating Anatomy of the Orbit for Continuing Professional Development Education

Advanced postgraduate medical education for health-care professionals is constantly evolving. Understanding facial anatomy and especially its vascular system is crucial when performing soft tissue filler injections to avoid adverse events including tissue loss or irreversible blindness. Standard anatomical resources often fall short of elucidating clinically relevant concepts in more highly specialized areas of interest. A novel dissection approach for demonstrating the anatomy of the lateral orbit was presented at scientific meetings to participants from dermatology, plastic surgery, and general practice. Results from the post-course online survey (n = 52) were analyzed. The results of the survey reveal a high educational impact and a high clinical relevance of the novel dissection approach. In addition, the majority of respondents (97.7%; n = 51) felt that the exposed anatomical structure of the orbit and face improved their ability to safely perform cosmetic procedures on the face. More experienced respondents who had previously attended at least five cadaveric dissections were more likely to strongly agree that reviewing anatomy through this novel dissection approach increased their confidence in avoiding periorbital vascular danger zones. As minimally invasive outpatient procedures continue to evolve, practicing physicians and mid-level providers often face the challenge of having to reconcile preexisting anatomical knowledge with new clinical practice. Skills required to navigate high impact anatomy include visualization of structures that form the navigational landscape and avoidance of key danger zones. The novel dissection approach to the lateral orbit reflects the increasing focus on revisiting, reforming, and redesigning anatomy for continuing professional development activities.

Clinical Management of Nasal Skin Necrosis Caused by Hyaluronic Acid Filler

ABSTRACT

Nose augmentation with Hyaluronic acid (HA) fillers has been considered the preferred technique for minimally invasive cosmetic procedures. Despite severe complications related to HA injection are rare, none of the existing treatment protocols has been established as standard. The aim of this report is to present an alternative approach to treat nasal skin necrosis related to HA injection. A high dose of hyaluronidase - 6000 IU was applied in the nose, for the purpose of reversing a necrotic process. The present findings suggest that a high dose of hyaluronidase could be a promising approach to treat severe nasal skin necrosis caused by HA filler.

Non-Surgical Rhinoplasty: The Ascending Technique and a 14-Year Retrospective Study of 2130 Cases

INTRODUCTION

Non-surgical rhinoplasty or liquid/filler rhinoplasty is one of the fastest-growing cosmetic procedures worldwide. While several papers have been published on this topic, there has been no standardization of the technique. Most techniques advise injection in a top-down manner, similar to a traditional rhinoplasty. We present our ascending technique performed in 2130 cases. This constitutes one of the largest series published on this subject.

METHODS

Patient records were retrospectively analysed from 2006 to 2019. All patients were injected with hyaluronic acid fillers. We employed an ascending approach which consisted of four sites: nasal tip, columellar base, dorsum (including supratip) and radix. The tip was first set at the appropriate projection and rotation and then the dorsum adjusted to meet it.

RESULTS

Since 2006, 2130 patients underwent non-surgical rhinoplasty; 2023 patients were female (95%), and 107 were male (5%). The proportions by site injected were tip 95%, columella 58%, dorsum 83%, radix 62%. Sixty-two percent (1321) repeated the procedure after 1 year. Two percent of patients had persistent tip redness which recovered. There was no skin necrosis or ocular complications.

CONCLUSIONS

In non-surgical rhinoplasty, all modifications are being done by pure addition, unlike surgical rhinoplasty. In this scenario, the risk of over-projecting the tip is higher. Hence, we believe it is important to set the tip at the desired projection and size and then raise the dorsum accordingly to match. Our high satisfaction rate over 2130 patients validates the efficacy of this ascending technique.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE IV

This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors - www.springer.com/00266 .

Non-surgical rhinoplasty using hyaluronic acid dermal fillers: A systematic review

BACKGROUND

Non-surgical rhinoplasty using hyaluronic acid dermal fillers is a cosmetic procedure that has been becoming increasingly popular among patients wanting to correct nasal deformities or nasal irregularities, in the recent years.

AIM

This systematic review aims to provide quality evidence about the success of non-surgical rhinoplasty procedures in terms of patient satisfaction and complications.

METHODS

A systematic electronic literature search using keywords and MESH search terms over the PubMed/Medline, Cochrane Central, Scopus, and EBSCO online databases was conducted from November 2005 to February 2021. Additionally, the reference lists of included systematic reviews were hand searched. Data collected included patient satisfaction and complications from prospective and experimental studies providing highest level of evidence. Articles were critically appraised, and MINORS scale was used to assess the risk of bias.

RESULTS

Based on the search criteria, 2896 citations were found. After removing duplicates and screening for relevance, 23 citations were finalized for full-text review, of which 12 articles were excluded and 11 articles were included in the study. The average satisfaction of patients amongst the studies was found to be >90%. In all the studies, transient edema and erythema, post-injection pain, and bruising were some temporary complications. Rare complications that were reported were vascular impairments and hematoma.

CONCLUSIONS

Non-surgical rhinoplasty is a good, minimally invasive alternative over conventional rhinoplasty. There is however a paucity of quality data in the form of experimental and prospective studies regarding the accuracy, effectiveness, and complications of non-surgical rhinoplasty.

Skin Necrosis and Vision Loss or Impairment After Facial Filler Injection

Purpose of the present study is to objectively evaluate the number of severe vascular complications, represented by skin necrosis and vision loss or impairment, following facial filler injection. The investigators implemented a review of the literature including articles published on PubMed database without limitation about year of publication, including all reports concerning skin necrosis and vision loss or impairment related to the injection of fillers for cosmetic uses. The search highlighted 45 articles and a total of 164 cases of skin necrosis and vision loss or impairment after injection of different substances. The injection site most frequently associated with complications was the nose (44.5%), followed by glabella (21%), nasolabial fold (15%), and forehead (10%). Results of the present study suggest that injectable filler can cause severe complications even in expertized hands. Treatments in the new defined "Dangerous triangle" must be carefully carried out. Despite our expectations, the highest rates of sever adverse events have been associated with autologous fat transfer practice.

Specific complications associated with non-surgical rhinoplasty

Non-surgical rhinoplasty is becoming an increasingly common procedure to alter the appearance and cosmesis of the nose. Although rare, complications with this procedure do exist, some of which can be devastating. Major complications include infection, vascular compromise, skin necrosis, and blindness. Here we discuss the nasal anatomy, complications associated with non-surgical rhinoplasty, and techniques to prevent these complications.

Complications Secondary to Nonsurgical Rhinoplasty: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

The popularity of nonsurgical rhinoplasty with injectable fillers continues to rise, and it is important to understand the scope of potential adverse outcomes. The purpose of our study is to determine the prevalence and types of adverse outcomes secondary to nonsurgical rhinoplasty.

DATA SOURCES

PubMed, Cochrane, Embase.

REVIEW METHODS

The data sources were explored using the following combination of terms: (("inject*" OR "nonsurgical" OR "augmentation" OR "filler") AND "rhinoplast*") AND ("complication" OR "adverse" OR "embol*"). Studies on human nonsurgical rhinoplasty using injectable fillers were included. A quantitative meta-analysis was performed on articles with low risk of bias.

RESULTS

The search yielded 37 publications for review, with 23 included cohort studies and 14 case reports with 8604 patients undergoing nonsurgical rhinoplasty with reported complications. The overall rate of adverse outcome across all cohort studies was 2.52%. The most commonly reported complications were bruising (1.58%) and hematoma (0.13%). While uncommon, there are several reports of major complications including 30 episodes of vessel occlusion (0.35%), 7 reports of skin necrosis (0.08%), 8 reports of vision loss (0.09%), and 6 reports of infection (0.07%).

CONCLUSION

Overall, nonsurgical rhinoplasty with injectable fillers is safe with low rates of complications. However, serious complications, such as vision loss, skin necrosis, and vessel occlusion, can occur. Further studies are needed to optimize delivery of injectable fillers in the nose to decrease the rate of adverse outcomes.

Adverse events in facial plastic surgery: Data-driven insights into systems, standards, and self-assessment

PURPOSE

Complications in facial plastic surgery can lead to pain, suffering, and permanent harm. Yet, the etiology and outcomes of adverse events are understudied. This study aims to determine the etiology and outcomes of adverse events reported in aesthetic facial plastic surgery and identify quality improvement opportunities.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A cross-sectional survey analysis was conducted using an anonymous 22-item questionnaire distributed to members of the American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery (AAO-HNS) and American Academy of Facial Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery (AAFPRS). Participants were queried on demographics, practice type, and adverse events related to aesthetic facial surgeries.

RESULTS

Two hundred fifty-three individuals participated; nearly half of respondents (49.0%) held membership in both AAO-HNS and AAFPRS. Of these, 40.8% of respondents reported at least one adverse event within the past 12 months of practice. A total of 194 adverse events were reported, most commonly related to facelift (n = 59/194, 30.4%), rhinoplasty (n = 55/194, 28.4%), and injection procedures (n = 38/194, 19.6%), with hematoma or seroma being the most commonly described. Most adverse events were self-limited, but approximately 68% resulted in further procedures. Surgeon error or poor judgement (n = 42) and patient non-adherence (n = 18) were the most commonly ascribed reasons for adverse events; 37.1% of participants reported a change in clinical practice after the incident.

CONCLUSIONS

Adverse events were not infrequent in facial plastic surgery. Understanding these adverse events can provide impetus for tracking outcomes, standardization, and engagement with lifelong learning, self-assessment, and evaluation of practice performance.

Nonsurgical Rhinoplasty Using Injectable Fillers: A Safety Review of 2488 Procedures

Background: Injectable fillers are used worldwide to improve the appearance of the nose by nonsurgical methods. The procedure is not without risks, as blindness and skin necrosis have been reported as a consequence of filler injections in the nose. Objective: To determine an overall adverse event (AE) rate for the nonsurgical rhinoplasty (NSR) procedure and to assess whether previous surgical rhinoplasty increases the odds of an AE. Methods: A retrospective chart review of 2275 patients and 2488 NSR procedures for a 10-year period from a single physician injector was conducted. Results: The overall procedural AE rate was 7.6%, with five cases (0.20%) considered serious (ischemia and necrosis). Previous surgical rhinoplasty patients had a greater AE rate (10.8%) than those patients without previous surgery (7.4%), with a significant odds ratio of 1.51 (95% confidence interval: 1.03-2.18); p = 0.032. Injecting the tip and sidewall of the nose had the highest AE rates for both categories of patients. Conclusions: NSR is a relatively safe procedure with the majority of AEs common injection site reactions. Patients with previous surgical rhinoplasty demonstrated significantly increased odds of an AE potentially due to surgical changes in anatomy.

Managing intravascular complications following treatment with calcium hydroxylapatite: An expert consensus

BACKGROUND

Inadvertent intra-arterial injection of dermal fillers including calcium hydroxylapatite (CaHA) can result in serious adverse events including soft tissue necrosis, permanent scarring, visual impairment, and blindness. When intra-arterial injection occurs, immediate action is required for optimal outcomes, but the infrequency of this event means that many physicians may never have experienced this scenario. The aim of this document is to provide evidence-based and expert opinion recommendations for the recognition and management of vascular compromise following inadvertent injection of CaHA.

METHODS

An international group of experts with experience in injection of CaHA and management of vascular complications was convened to develop a consensus on the optimal management of vascular compromise following intra-arterial CaHA injection. The consensus members were asked to provide preventative advice for the avoidance of intravascular injection and to produce a treatment protocol for acute and delayed presentation. To ensure all relevant treatment options were included, the recommendations were supplemented with a PubMed search of the literature.

RESULTS

For prevention of intra-arterial CaHA injection, consensus members outlined the importance of a thorough knowledge of facial vascular anatomy and patient history, as well as highlighting potential risk zones and optimal injection techniques. Individual sections document how to recognize the symptoms of vascular occlusion leading to vision loss and tissue necrosis as well as detailed treatment protocols for the management of these events. For impending tissue necrosis, recommendations are provided for early and delayed presentations with treatment protocols for acute and follow-up treatment. A separate section details the treatment options for open and closed wounds.

CONCLUSIONS

All physicians should be prepared for the eventuality of intra-arterial injection of a dermal filler, despite its rarity. These consensus recommendations combine advice from aesthetic experts with the latest reports from the published literature to provide an up-to-date office-based protocol for the prevention and treatment of complications arising from intra-arterial CaHA injection.

Cannula versus needle in medical rhinoplasty: the nose knows

The use of hyaluronic acid (HA) fillers has become a popular alternative for nose remodeling, although poor understanding of the nasal anatomy has resulted in adverse events and generated some controversy. Among them, is the question of where and when to use cannulas vs needles. Through multiple cadaver dissections, clinical experience and the review of medical literature the authors conclude the use of needle over cannula is preferred, assuring a correct injection plane lying fully against the bone or cartilage. Although blunt in nature, cannulas may lead to difficulty in determining with precision the exact depth of product placement and contribute to more dissection of adjacent structures. Thorough knowledge of the highly variable nasal anatomy, including vessel depth location is of outmost importance in avoiding adverse events. Good patient selection is critical where most noses for augmentation rhinoplasty and some reduction rhinoplasty candidates where the goal is to camouflage the dorsal hump are amenable to medical rhinoplasty, unless there is reduced skin elasticity of nasal soft tissues or distortion of anatomy from surgery or trauma. Appropriate product selection is important for effective results. The authors suggest fillers with low cohesivity and high lifting capacity. Finally, we suggest a technique referred as Rhinosculpting base in the use the use of three conceptual elements: facial analysis, light reflection, and use of HA gel as a cartilage graft, in combination with the detailed injection technique presented in this article, which ensures a safer and satisfying treatment outcome.

Facial vascular danger zones for filler injections

Filler injections are widely used for facial rejuvenation. The technique is safe as long as some precautions are respected. In this review we will focus on vascular anatomy in the upper, middle and lower face. We performed a PUBMED research on "facial danger zones" and "filler injections" and "hyaluronic acid" and "vascular compromise" with a focus on the last decade. This is of particular importance since vascular compromise is one of the most severe adverse events possibly leading to tissue necrosis and in rare cases to loss of vision. We describe the danger zones in these esthetic units and provide recommendations how to avoid severe adverse events. We report on temporal region, glabella and nose, infraorbital region, nasolabial folds and nasal triangle, lips, and chin. Although we focus on hyaluronic acid fillers, our recommendations will also scope other filler types and autologous adipose tissue transfer. We also take a closer look on innovations to improve the safety of facial filler injections. Facial rejuvenation with hyaluronic acid fillers is a popular method. It is safe if the facial danger zones are recognized and proper injection techniques and fillers are used.

Treatment Algorithm for Hyaluronic Acid-Related Complication Based on a Systematic Review of Case Reports, Case Series, and Clinical Experience

Study Design

Systematic review of hyaluronic acid (HA)-related complications.

Objective

To systematically review all available literature including case reports and case series to identify a pattern for the management of vascular compromise resulting in facial skin ischemia and ocular manifestations following HA injection.

Methods

This review was based on a systematic search of 3 electronic databases PubMed, CINAHL, and Scopus for all available literature including case series and case reports from database inception to July 2019. Only a total of 52 case reports/series were eligible for review and included 107 patients.

Results

The reviewed literature available was comprised from case reports/series and indicated that management of both impending skin necrosis and visual disturbances is variable with no repetitive pattern of action. Yet, successful management is time dependent as early interventions stopped progression and, in some cases, even reversed adverse effects.

Conclusion

Results found no universal protocol for achieving optimal results for adverse effects and as such, we present a step-by-step algorithm for the emergency management of complications following HA injection.

Use of injectables in rhinoplasty retouching: Towards an evolution of surgical strategy? Literature review

BACKGROUND

Surgical revision rate of rhinoplasty is from 5% to 15% in literature.

OBJECTIVE OF REVIEW

In the context of post-rhinoplasty deformities, we aim to investigate the modalities of using injectables, their impacts on revision rate of rhinoplasty as well as their influences on the surgical strategy.

TYPE OF REVIEW

We realized an international literature review to collect informations on main studies reporting series of exclusive secondary medical rhinoplasties or mixed primary/secondary medical rhinoplasties, as well as per-operative injection.

SEARCH STRATEGY

The databases of the National Library of Medicine, Cochrane Library, Embase and Web of science were explored using the following Boolean string: (rhinoplasty OR nose) AND (injectable OR fillers OR hyaluronic acid OR calcium hydroxylapatite). The search was limited to the English language literature for studies published from 2007 up to December 2019.

RESULTS

Fifteen cohort studies were included. Hyaluronic acid was the most commonly used injectable for rhinoplasty revision. Patient satisfaction rates varied between 80% and 100%. Reinjections were necessary in about 20 to 50% of cases whatever the used injectables. Minor complications (swelling, bruising, erythema) were frequent after filler injections (4%). Severe complications such granulomas or vascular embolism causing skin necrosis/visual impairment were rare (0.4%). Their physiopathology, management and prevention are detailed.

CONCLUSIONS

The use of injectables seems to reduce the need of secondary surgical rhinoplasties. It can be expected that an evolution in surgical practices will result from injectables using, but it will be possible only if the technique is perfectly understood to avoid potentially serious vascular complications.

The Role of Hyaluronidase for the Skin Necrosis Caused by Hyaluronic Acid Injection-Induced Embolism: A Rabbit Auricular Model Study

BACKGROUND

Skin necrosis is considered the most serious complication of hyaluronic acid dermal filler injection procedures. To effectively treat skin necrosis, hyaluronidase injection is one of the essential preventative treatments, and yet optimal complication management remains an unmet need. Therefore, this paper investigates the effects of hyaluronidase injection timing on the treatment of skin necrosis.

METHODS

In an in vitro experiment, the carbazole method was used to determine the degradation time of hyaluronic acid gels in a large volume of hyaluronidase. In vivo experimental rabbit ear models were developed to simulate the skin necrosis caused by hyaluronic acid and the test animals distributed into five groups. Except one control group, the other four groups were injected with a large volume of hyaluronidase as treatment at 2 h, 4 h, 8 h and 16 h, respectively, after models were built. The necrosis degree of models was analyzed with necrotic area and histologic examination on the postoperative 7th day. Besides, temperatures of rabbit ears were observed to demonstrate the healing process of flap models.

RESULTS

The average necrotic area of flaps in the 2-h and 4-h injection groups showed a significant difference compared with that of the control group (p < 0.05; p < 0.05). The histologic examination showed that there were HA embolisms, vascular thrombolytic recanalization and arteriovenous thromboses in the survival area. In addition, the mean temperatures of the rabbit ear flaps fluctuated over time and showed clear differences between distal and proximal parts.

CONCLUSIONS

The area of flap necrosis positively correlates with injection timing of the large volume of hyaluronidase. More importantly, when injection timing is within 4 h, treatment effectiveness will be significantly improved.

NO LEVEL ASSIGNED

This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .