Real-World Outcomes of Lip Augmentation Using a Hyaluronic Acid-Based Filler With Low 1,4-Butanediol Diglycidyl Ether Content: A Prospective, Open-Label, Multicenter, Post-marketing Study

Background 1,4-butanediol diglycidyl ether (BDDE) is the most common cross-linker used to produce hyaluronic acid (HA)-based dermal fillers. However, BDDE may have cytotoxic and potentially mutagenic effects, raising safety concerns. Consequently, manufacturers are developing new HA filler formulations with reduced BDDE levels to mitigate potential biological risks. Here, we sought to evaluate the clinical outcomes of lip augmentation performed using an HA-based filler with a reduced BDDE content (Agex Fill Volume®; Biodue SpA, Barberino Tavarnelle, Italy) in a real-world clinical setting. Methods This was a prospective, open-label, multicenter, post-marketing study conducted over six months. Thirty adult subjects (29 women and one man) who desired a ≥1-point improvement on the validated Lip Fullness Scale 2 (LFS2) were enrolled. The primary efficacy endpoint was the post-procedural increase in the investigator-reported LFS2 compared to baseline. Other endpoints included self-perceived happiness assessed using the Happiness Measure Scale (HMS) and safety. Results Of the study participants, 73% (22/30) demonstrated an improvement of at least one point in their LFS2 scores immediately after treatment compared to baseline, thus qualifying as responders. Six months later, the responder rate, based on LFS2 scores, remained steady at 66.7% (20/30). Importantly, these aesthetic improvements were consistently associated with a positive impact on subject-reported HMS, with a significant difference (p < 0.001) between post-treatment and baseline scores. All adverse events (AEs) reported after treatment were mild. Conclusions Agex Fill Volume®, a HA filler with low BDDE content, provides a safe and effective option for enhancing lip volume in real-world aesthetic settings.

Delayed Granulomas as a Complication Secondary to Lip Augmentation with Dermal Fillers: A Systematic Review

Introduction  Lip augmentation with dermal filler is rising in popularity. There are generally minimal side effects that are mild and transient. However, long-term complications may occur and include lumps, bumps, nodules, or granulomas. To better understand this uncommon but challenging outcome, we aim to perform a thorough systematic review of the published literature related to nodule or granuloma formation after cosmetic soft tissue augmentation of the lips.

Methods  A search of published literature was conducted in accordance with PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines in April 2021 and included PubMed, ScienceDirect, Embase, Google Scholar, and Cochrane databases. The Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) terms used included the following terms: “lip filler,” “hyaluronic acid,” “lip injection,” “lip augmentation,” “silicone,” “poly-L-lactic acid,” “calcium hydroxyapatite,” “polymethylmethacrylate,” “complications,” “reaction,” “granuloma,” and “nodule.” All studies were reviewed by two independent reviewers. Any discrepancies were resolved by a third reviewer.

Results  The initial search for filler-related nodules or granulomas yielded 2,954 articles and 28 were included in the final analysis containing 66 individual cases of lip nodules. All but one patient was female. The mean age was 50 years. Nodules presented on average 35.2 months or 2.9 years after initial treatment. Thirty-seven nodules underwent histological analysis, the majority of which identified the presence of a foreign-body granuloma. Silicone was the most reported filler used followed by hyaluronic acid. Most cases resolved following multiple treatments including oral antibiotics or steroids followed by surgical excision.

Conclusion  Understanding the sequelae of lip augmentation with filler products allows clinicians to provide safe and effective treatment. Nodules that present months to years following dermal treatment may represent a foreign-body granuloma. A combination of oral antibiotics, intralesional or oral steroids, and surgical excision successfully treated the majority of cases in our study.

A minimalistic approach for effective lip augmentation-A case report

BACKGROUND

Lip augmentation using dermal fillers is a widely performed procedure, which gives immediate and gratifying results. However, the cost associated with it is a major concern and reservation for a lot of patients. An innovative minimalistic technique can be used to enhance the lips using minimal amount of filler to provide maximum results, especially in aging lips. Though a simple and effective method, this technique has not yet gained popularity worldwide.

AIM

To present a case demonstrating a new and innovative technique for lip augmentation as a part of lower face rejuvenation.

METHOD

A 55-year-old female patient underwent augmentation of lips using the described technique. Since she had a limited budget, treatment was planned to rejuvenate her face in just 1 ml of filler. Areas on the face which would give maximum impact with minimal amount of filler were treated. Treatment was done using Juvederm Ultra Plus XC (JUV_X+ ; 24 mg/ml) dermal filler.

RESULTS

Using this technique, we were able to demonstrate that a small quantity of filler when used suitably with an understanding of the areas of concern could provide an impact on the overall rejuvenation.

CONCLUSION

The described technique is an effective method of lip enhancement with minimal cost, especially in aging patients. Skillful application of a suitable injection technique is required to achieve a desired esthetic outcome.

Evaluating safety in hyaluronic acid lip injections

INTRODUCTION

Soft tissue filler augmentation has become increasingly popular due to its perceived ease and impressive results. Unfortunately, although the results are impressive, so are the reported complications. This article describes complications specific to peri-oral soft tissue filler injection and then discusses evidence-based, anatomic prevention and treatment guidelines.

AREAS COVERED

The authors aimed at providing an overview of the complications associated with peri-oral soft tissue filler. Hyaluronic Acid (H.A) fillers may have devastating complications which are oft undisclosed or published. This narrative review aims to describe the various complications and provide preventative strategies.

EXPERT OPINION

Given the paucity of prospective, randomized clinical trials on the subject and in light of complication underreporting, the authors believe that efficacy and safety literature on the subject is lacking. Injectors must rely on the one strength which exists in the lip literature to date, that is anatomy. The basis of all successful injections is a mandatory understanding of normal as well as variations of vital structures in an area, combined with meticulous injection techniques, deposition of small aliquots of product and the ability to recognize unwanted adverse events early enough to act on them.

Hyaluronic Acid Is an Effective Dermal Filler for Lip Augmentation: A Meta-Analysis

Introduction: The lips and the mouth play an indispensable role in vocalization, mastication and face aesthetics. Various noxious factors may alter and destruct the original structure, and appearance of the lips and the anatomical area surrounding the mouth. The application of hyaluronic acid (HA) may serve as a safe method for lip regeneration. Although a number of studies exist for HA effectiveness and safety, its beneficial effect is not well-established. Aim: The present meta-analysis and systematic review was performed to investigate the effectiveness of HA on lip augmentation. We also investigated the types and nature of adverse effects (AEs) of HA application. Methods: We reported our meta-analysis in accordance with the PRISMA Statement. PROSPERO protocol registration: CRD42018102899. We performed the systematic literature search in CENTRAL, Embase, and MEDLINE. Randomized controlled trials, cohort studies, case series and case reports were included. The untransformed proportion (random-effects, DerSimonian-Laird method) of responder rate to HA injection was calculated. For treatment related AEs descriptive statistics were used. Results: The systematic literature search yielded 32 eligible records for descriptive statistics and 10 records for quantitative synthesis. The results indicated that the overall estimate of responders (percentage of subjects with increased lip fullness by one point or higher) was 91% (ES = 0.91, 95% CI:0.85-0.96) 2 months after injection. The rate of responders was 74% (ES = 0.74, 95% CI:0.66-0.82) and 46% (ES = 0.46, 95% CI:0.28-0.65) after 6 and 12 months, respectively. We included 1,496 participants for estimating the event rates of AEs. The most frequent treatment-related AEs were tenderness (88.8%), injection site swelling (74.3%) and bruising (39.5%). Rare AEs included foreign body granulomas (0.6%), herpes labialis (0.6%) and angioedema (0.3%). Conclusion: Our meta-analysis revealed that lip augmentation with injectable HA is an efficient method for increasing lip fullness for at least up to 6 months after augmentation. Moreover, we found that most AEs of HA treatment were mild or moderate, but a small number of serious adverse effects were also found. In conclusion, further well-designed RCTs are still needed to make the presently available evidence stronger.

Male lip filler-Aesthetic enhancement is not just limited to females: A case report

BACKGROUND

Lips play an important role in facial aesthetics. Hyaluronic acid fillers have been widely used for lip augmentation in females but very few men seek this treatment due to the fear of feminization of lips. However, there are very few case reports published for correction of lips using fillers in men.

AIM

To assess the effectiveness of hyaluronic acid dermal fillers for enhancement of lips in males.

METHOD

A 52-year-old male underwent two sessions of treatment for inturned lips. In the first session, 2 ml hyaluronic acid dermal filler (Juvederm Ultra Plus-JUP) with 27G × 8 mm needle via bolus and retrograde linear thread technique was used. Assessment of lips was done after one week. Second session of treatment was done after 30 months of first treatment with 1 ml of filler.

RESULTS

Injection of filler not only led to a significant improvement in vermillion show, but also improved the overall facial appearance. The results of this treatment were long lasting and even after 30 months from the first treatment the patients' vermillion body still showed ten per cent improvement from the original.

CONCLUSION

Dermal lip filler treatment in men can be a very satisfying and rewarding procedure. Its awareness should be spread afar to increase its acceptability.

A prospective, open-label, multicentric, single-arm, post-marketing clinical study to evaluate effectiveness and safety of Cross-Linked Sodium Hyaluronate 24mg with Lidocaine 3mg Injection in subjects undergoing treatment for facial wrinkles and lip augmentation

BACKGROUND

Hyaluronic acid (HA) fillers are quite commonly used since several years for soft tissue augmentation.

AIM

The purpose of this study was to evaluate primarily the safety and secondarily the clinical effectiveness of Cross-Linked Sodium Hyaluronate 24 mg with Lidocaine 3 mg (Jeunesso 24L) injection, in subjects undergoing treatment for facial wrinkles and lip augmentation.

METHOD

Patients between the age groups of 18 and 75 years, who were seeking soft tissue augmentation treatment on the face and with wrinkle severity score (WSS) ≥2 for bilateral Nasolabial Folds (NLF), were included in the study. The appropriate quantity of the filler was injected at the treatment site. Clinical efficacy assessments were conducted independently at 3 and 6 months after baseline. Clinical efficacy was assessed using Wrinkle Severity Rating Scale (WSRS) and a Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale (GAIS).

RESULTS

The mean pain score was found to be 2.57 ± 2.06 immediately after injection which was reduced to 0.1 ± 0.675 at 15 min and this further subsided to "No Pain" in any of the participants at 60 min post the injection. WSRS mean score before treatment was 2.76, which were significantly reduced to 2.14, at 3 months. Majority of participants found an improvement in the marionette line severity. Also, significant improvements were seen in the perioral and lip areas. The Study filler was well-tolerated and no side effects were reported.

CONCLUSION

The study indicates that this particular filler, HA+L, is useful for cosmetic improvements in the nasolabial folds and for enhancement of the lips.

Lymphangioma Formation Following Hyaluronic Acid Injection for Lip Augmentation

Administration of hyaluronic acid (HA) filler for aesthetic lip augmentation is a routine and common procedure with a low rate of adverse reactions. This case report documents an extremely rare complication of lip augmentation with HA leading to the development of lymphangiomas.

Lymphangiomas are uncommon hamartomas of the lymphatic system. Although usually congenital, they can be acquired due to trauma, inflammation, or lymphatic blockage. They may be in the deep or superficial tissues, with superficial forms being either lymphangioma circumscriptum or acquired lymphangioma, also referred to as lymphangiectasia. Acquired lymphangiomas are typically formed by blockage of lymphatic drainage leading to dilation of the lymphatic channels. The diagnosis in our case report is acquired lymphangioma.

A 27-year-old female presented with a two-year history of linear swellings in her upper lip. These lumps followed the line where HA filler had been injected four years earlier. Hyaluronidase had previously been used unsuccessfully to remove these lumps. The patient was treated with surgery to excise the lesions. Five masses were excised, and histopathological analysis displayed the presence of variably ectatic lacunae, lined by cells with CD34 expression, a lymph-vascular-endothelial marker. There were also scattered macrophages with CD68 expression in the interstices. These are typical features of a lymphangioma. The patient was satisfied with the excellent aesthetic and functional outcome.

To our knowledge this is the first case of a lymphangioma following HA lip augmentation. Although rare, this complication can have aesthetic implications for the patient which may require further treatment or surgery to correct.

Lip Augmentation Using Hyaluronic Acid Filler and a 4-mm Needle: A Safer, More Natural, and Predictable Approach

Clinicians employ several techniques to augment lips with hyaluronic acid (HA) filler. To the best of our knowledge, however, no previous study has documented the use of a 4-mm 30-gauge needle in this context. This paper describes the anatomical rationale behind and practical application of such a needle applied very superficially in the vermillion border during lip augmentation. Using a 4-mm 30-gauge needle facilitates precise HA placement into the safer subcutaneous plane of the lip and lowers the pressure needed to extrude the filler, which might optimize patient comfort. This technique aims to increase the safety and predictability of lip augmentation with HA fillers. Credit is owed to Dr. Jean Louis Sebagh, who provided the inspiration to use the described needle for this evidence-based technique.

The use of botulinum toxin A in upper lip augmentation

BACKGROUND

Full lips are beauty standards. Botulinum toxin A (BTA) paralyzes the orbicularis oris muscle to achieve the eversion of the lip, and thus makes the lip look plump.

AIMS

This study presents three cases of BTA injection to the lip and evaluates the possible changes in the labial morphology and the lip surface area.

METHODS

Three patients received a total of 4U BTA injection at the vermilion border of the upper lip. Vectra® H1 3D imaging system was used to capture 3D photographs of the lips before injection and two weeks after injection. Eight linear distances and the upper lip surface area were measured. Anthropometric measurements before and after injection were compared.

RESULTS

Patients displayed a larger upper vermillion height (P = .038) and a smaller cutaneous upper lip height (P = .024). There was a trend for a larger upper lip surface area, but not statistically significant (P = .109). Symptoms of slight perioral muscular palsy and mouth incompetence lasted about one month in three patients.

CONCLUSION

BTA helps to enlarge the upper lip and shorten the philtrum. The BTA injection can be an option for lip enhancement with caution.

Multiple oral granulomatous nodules to hyaluronic acid filler

A 74-year-old Caucasian woman presented with a 2-week history of multiple nodules in both lips and perioral region that caused her mild discomfort while eating. The patient reported hyaluronic acid infiltration on both lips 5 months prior to presentation. The examination revealed multiple, well-defined, millimetric, and firm nodules on both lips and oral mucosa. An excisional biopsy of one of the nodules was performed under local anesthesia. Histopathological analysis demonstrated acute eosinophilic inflammation, fibrosis, and granulomas on mucoid material, positive for colloidal iron stain and Alcian blue stain, alongside a minor salivary gland showed mild atrophy, fibrosis, and fat infiltration. Enhancement of the aged lip using hyaluronic acid, to restore the bulkiness and elasticity that have been lost with age, is very common. Nevertheless, soft tissue fillers are used in a wide age range. Hyaluronic acid represents 78% of the dermal filler injections in the United States, been the second most popular nonsurgical cosmetic procedure after botulinum toxin injection. Foreign body granulomatous reaction is a rare delayed complication that has been well documented elsewhere and it has been associated with poor injection technique. Although it also has been related to hypersensitivity reactions that may be caused by impurities developed during the bacterial fermentation process, treatment of granulomatous reactions with hyaluronidase is recommended.

Hyaluronic acid fillers in lip augmentation procedure: a clinical and histological study

Several approaches have been proposed for soft tissue augmentation using injectable materials for lip and soft-tissue augmentation due to their physical and biological properties. Hyaluronic acid represents a natural component of the connective tissues, related to wound healing and skin regeneration. The aim of this research was to investigate the clinical and histological effectiveness of cross-linked hyaluronic acid for lip augmentation. A total of 8 patients were treated for lip augmentation with a clinical follow up of 60 days. After this period a histological evaluation was performed to evaluate the healing of the treated regions. The healing phase reported no inflammatory response, tissue contractions and no local flogistic evidence in the treated areas, where the filling volume appeared maintained. The 60 days histological evaluation showed evidence of filler resorption with few infiltrated inflammatory cells. The clinical and histological findings suggested that cross-linked hyaluronic acid represents a safe and effective tool for lip augmentation.

Serious complication as a result of lip augmentation with vitamin E

Nowadays lip augmentation with FDA-approved fillers is becoming popular. However, because of financial concerns many patients seek for unregistered materials. Here, we report two cases who use vitamin E for lip augmentation. They experience severe infiltration and discharge less than one month after injection. Biopsy revealed lipogranuloma formation. They were treated with incision and drainage, antibiotic, and corticosteroids. Although these complications are usually difficult to treat, the patients had good clinical response and no recurrence in 5-month follow-up.

Lip Measurements and Preferences in Asians and Hispanics: A Brief Review

Objective: Most literature regarding lip augmentation refers to Caucasian anthropometric measurements, but ethnic differences affect facial dimensions and the evaluation of beauty. Specifically with regard to Asians and Hispanics, dermatology does not have much literature on the subject. This review investigates the differences in lip measurements and preferences of Asians and Hispanics compared with those of Caucasians. Design: A literature search of other fields, including plastic surgery, maxillofacial surgery, orthodontics, and forensic anthropology, was conducted, and relevant articles were selected that applied to the discussion of lip measurements and preferences in Asians and Hispanics. Results: Lip measurements do appear to differ between Asians, Hispanics, and Caucasians, and ethnic background appears to influence lip preferences. Conclusions: It is inappropriate to use Caucasian measurements and generalizations in lip preferences when determining what is "ideal" when aesthetically augmenting lips among Asians and Hispanics. Ultimately, it is important to take into account the goals, anatomy, and ethnic background of each individual patient before performing lip augmentation.

Assessment of the Efficacy and Safety of Hyaluronic Acid Gel Injection in the Restoration of Fullness of the Upper Lips

BACKGROUND AND AIM

Lips have a significant role in face aesthetic perception, and lip augmentation is one of the most commonly requested aesthetic procedures. Non-permanent dermal fillers, such as hyaluronic acid (HA), are used for augmenting the lips. This article presents the results of Phase II, before - after designed study, assessing the safety and efficacy of a soft tissue HA filler, for upper lip augmentation.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Investigators treated 10 healthy adult women 28-45 years old, using a single injection of Hyamax Kiss soft tissue HA filler (a product from Hyamed Laboratories, Switzerland) for upper lip augmentation. The primary efficacy endpoint was an increase in lip fullness at least one grade on Medicis Lip Fullness Scale at 2, 12 and 24 weeks post-treatment. Furthermore, the effectiveness and durability of filler were assessed using a 5-point Investigator's Global Assessment (IGA). Adverse events and volunteers' satisfaction were reported using visual analog scale.

RESULTS

Response to treatment (as defined above) after 2, 12 and 24 weeks were observed in 80%, 70% and 80% of patients, respectively. No statistical difference was found in response to treatment rate between follow-up visits (P = 0.83). The mean value of IGA score in weeks 2, 12 and 24 were 3.4 ± 0.96, 3.3 ± 0.67 and 3.3 ± 0.67, respectively. The study subjects were almost all satisfied with their lip improvement. Reported adverse effects were temporary and mostly mild in severity.

CONCLUSION

Soft tissue HA filler tested in this study was well tolerated, efficient and durable when used for upper lip augmentation.

Complications of injected vitamin E as a filler for lip augmentation: case series and therapeutic approach

The strive for proficient cosmetic facial appearance is growing in the past decades. Fillers for tissue augmentation are gaining wide popularity. Uncertified products based on oleic solutions are applied by untrained staff, thus growing the risk for certain complications such as infections, allergic and irritant contact dermatitis, and lipogranuloma formation. We present a series of three cases lipogranuloma after liquid vitamin E injection for lip augmentation. In all cases, painful edema at the injected area followed the procedure. The patients were presented with erythema, firm indurations of the lips and the perioral skin, and tenderness. Histological examination of skin biopsies showed round-ovoid cavities of varying sizes, resulting in a Swiss cheese-like appearance, consistent with a lipogranuloma. In this paper, we propose a protocol for treatment of this specific complication with systemic corticosteroids and a broad spectrum antibiotics.

Paraffinoma of lips and oral mucosa: Case report and brief review of the literature

Interstitial application of paraffin in plastic and reconstructive surgery is obsolete due to the development of permanent and extensive foreign body granulomas at the site of application. These granulomas can cause severe physical impairment and develop their own prognostic worth. Furthermore, the disperse oil droplets are not a locally stable suspension. Therefore, the desired aesthetic aspect can get lost in the course of a potential dislocation of the suspension. In addition, the interstitial confluence of non-resorbable droplets to larger oil drops causes palpable and sometimes visible indurations of the skin, the correlate of chronic inflammation. This case report describes the efforts undertaken to release the patient at least temporarily from her paraffin granulomas and to improve her appearance. The relevant literature is briefly discussed. Furthermore, we present some immunohistochemical findings to specify the foreign body reaction associated with paraffin injections into connective tissues.

Lip augmentation dermal filler reactions, histopathologic features

Instances of perioral and labial foreign body reactions to a variety of injectable dermal fillers were selected from the oral and maxillofacial pathology and dermatopathology archives at Pacific Pathology Laboratory of San Diego with the objective being to engender a compilation of histopathologic characteristics that allow the pathologist to identify the inciting materials. All cases of foreign body reactions located in the lips and perioral regions were reviewed by four pathologists, retaining those cases with a history of injection lip augmentation as well as those with histologic features previously documented to represent dermal filler substances. In selected cases, Alcian blue pH 2.5 with and without hyaluronidase pretreatment was performed. Immunohistochemical markers for macrophages (CD 68), adipocytes (S-100) and keratinocytes (AE1/AE2) were undertaken. All instances presented as single or multiple submucosal plaques, nodules or swellings. Natural polymers including collagen, hyaluronate, hydroxyapatite, poly-L-lactate and synthetic polymers including carboxymethyl cellulose, dimethylpolysiloxane, and polyethyl methacrylate induce histologically unique features that allow for their identification. Host histopathologic responses included nodule without foreign body reaction, nodule with chronic inflammation, granuloma with epithelioid histiocytic and multinucleated giant cell reaction. Dermal filler foreign body host reactions in conjunction with the morphology of the foreign materials themselves are unique and can be differentiated from one another microscopically.