Venous Thromboembolism in Aesthetic Surgery: Risk Optimization in the Preoperative, Intraoperative, and Postoperative Settings

An In-Depth Analysis of 1370 Consecutive Abdominoplasties: Fascial Plication Increases Risk of Venous Thromboembolism, and Scoring for Plication Improves the Caprini Risk Assessment Model

BACKGROUND

Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is the most dangerous complication of abdominoplasty. One relatively undefined risk factor is plication, which in theory increases VTE risk.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the thromboembolic risk of plication.

METHODS

A retrospective review of 1370 consecutive abdominoplasties by one surgeon was undertaken. Two groups were considered, plicated (n= 1089) and non-plicated (n = 281), and VTE rates were compared between these groups.

RESULTS

There were 25/1089 cases of VTE (2.3%) in plicated patients and 1/281 case of VTE (0.36%) in non-plicated patients, which was statistically significant (Fisher's exact test, p=0.028) despite the non-plicated group being a higher risk population. Case-Control matching yielded 225 pairs which differed statistically only by the presence or absence of plication; there were 12/225(5.3%) VTE events in the plicated group and 0/225 in the non-plicated group (McNemar's test, p=0.0015). Logistic regression demonstrated increased VTE risk with increasing age (OR 1.08, p<0.001), BMI (OR 1.34, p=0.002), Caprini score (OR 2.17, p<0.001), and especially plication (OR 16.76, p=0.008). Adding two points for plication to Caprini scores offered better risk stratification at a level of 7, with an improved combination of sensitivity/specificity (0.31/0.98 vs 0.69/0.96) and a 27% improvement over the 2005 Caprini RAM in the area under a Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) curve (0.826 vs 0.651, Z-value -3.596, p = 0.003).

CONCLUSIONS

Plication was shown to be a powerful risk factor for the development of VTE in abdominoplasty. Abdominal wall plication should be considered in risk assessment, and scoring for plication may improve the performance of the Caprini RAM.

Unfractionated Heparins, Low-Molecular-Weight Heparins, and Indirect Factor Xa Inhibitors in Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery: An Evidence-Based Review

SUMMARY

Venous thromboembolism can present with devastating complications and sequalae, particularly in the surgical patient. Current data support prophylactic anticoagulant use in high-risk hospitalized patients, defined as those with a Caprini Risk Assessment Model score of 7 or greater. The most frequently used chemoprophylaxis agents include unfractionated heparin, low-molecular-weight heparin, and indirect factor Xa inhibitors. The authors review the mechanisms of action, metabolism, reversal agents, indications, contraindications, advantages, and disadvantages of these medications in plastic and reconstructive surgery.

Literature Review: Venous Thromboembolism Prophylaxis in Plastic Surgery

Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is a postoperative complication experienced in all branches of surgery, including plastic surgery. Its occurrence can be lowered with adequate prophylaxis in the light of the patient's risk category and the type of surgery that will be performed. Nevertheless, thromboembolic prophylaxis is not routinely administered in plastic surgery. The prevention of VTE has gained significant attention in the past 5 years due to increased knowledge about the disease process and the alarming incidence rates. This literature review is specifically aimed at carrying out a synopsis of VTE prophylaxis trials conducted on plastic surgery patients. Antithrombotic agents have generally been avoided by plastic surgeons due to the increased risk of bleeding or hematomas; however, the prevalence of clinically important bleeding has not been found to increase with their use, as it emerges from numerous studies. VTE events can lead to increased morbidity and mortality rates, as well as a rise in healthcare costs. As it emerges from multiple studies, as a preventive measure against VTE, it is strongly advised to use mechanical prophylaxis along with low-molecular-weight heparin as the primary treatment option for plastic surgery patients who are at a greater risk. Up to date though, this practice is not commonly embraced by physicians. Preventing VTE is crucial, and measures to do so are necessary. However, there is no clear evidence to support the use of anticoagulation for plastic surgery patients, and some surgeons are hesitant to use it due to potential bleeding in extensive dissection areas.Level of Evidence III This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .

Clinical Evaluation of 310 Abdominoplasties and Measurement of Scar Level

BACKGROUND

Most published studies on abdominoplasty focus on methods to reduce the risk of seromas. These methods include limited dissection (lipoabdominoplasty), quilting sutures, and preservation of the Scarpa fascia. Quantitative evaluation of the aesthetic result has been lacking.

METHODS

A retrospective study was undertaken of all patients undergoing abdominoplasty in the author's practice from 2016 to 2022. A full abdominoplasty was performed, usually with liposuction (87%). All patients were treated under total intravenous anesthesia without paralysis or prone positioning. A single closed suction drain was removed 3 or 4 days after surgery. All procedures were performed as outpatients. Ultrasound surveillance was used to detect any deep venous thromboses. No patient received chemoprophylaxis. The operating table was flexed, often to 90°. Deep fascial anchoring sutures were used to attach the Scarpa fascia of the flap to the deep muscle fascia. Measurements of the scar level were made at intervals after surgery up to 1 year.

RESULTS

Three hundred ten patients were evaluated, including 300 women. The mean follow-up time was 1 year. The overall complication rate, which included minor scar deformities, was 35.8%. Five deep venous thromboses were detected. There were no hematomas. Fifteen patients (4.8%) developed seromas that were successfully treated by aspiration. The mean vertical scar level 1 month after surgery was 9.9 cm (range, 6.1-12.9 cm). There was no significant change in scar level at subsequent follow-up times up to 1 year. By comparison, the scar level in published studies ranged from 8.6 to 14.1 cm.

DISCUSSION

Avoidance of electrodissection reduces tissue trauma that causes seromas. Flexed patient positioning during surgery and deep fascial anchoring sutures are effective in keeping the scar low. By avoiding chemoprophylaxis, hematomas can be avoided. Limiting the dissection (lipoabdominoplasty), preserving the Scarpa fascia, and adding quilting (progressive tension) sutures are unnecessary.

CONCLUSIONS

Total intravenous anesthesia offers important safety advantages. Avoiding electrodissection is effective in keeping seroma rates at a tolerable level (5%), and the scar low and more easily concealed. Alternative methods present disadvantages that may contribute to a suboptimal aesthetic result and require additional operating time.

Undiagnosed Patent Foramen Ovale and Thrombophilic Gene Mutations Resulting in Pulmonary Embolism with Cryptogenic Stroke after Cosmetic Breast Surgery

Undiagnosed disorders or gene mutations can lead to life-threatening events even in cosmetic surgery. Herein, the authors present a case of a young and supposedly healthy 36-year-old woman who survived an episode of bilateral pulmonary embolism and cryptogenic stroke after cosmetic breast augmentation-mastopexy. Two days after cosmetic surgery, the patient presented at the emergency stroke unit after she collapsed at home, following frequent generalized seizures. After she was transferred to the intensive care unit, it was revealed that the patient had an undiagnosed patent foramen ovale and several thrombophilic gene mutations. During the stay, two episodes of active bleeding and beginning nipple-areola complex hypoperfusion led to bilateral implant removal. As a final result, the patient lost her breast implants and experienced persistent hypoesthesia of the entire left hemi body. However, this case might highlight deficits in current venous thromboembolism risk assessment and prophylaxis due to the missing considerations of undiagnosed disorders or gene mutations. Further, recommendations on dealing with implants or aesthetic outcome in crucial episodes should be introduced.

The Majority of Venous Thromboembolism Events Should Occur in Lower Risk Aesthetic Surgery Patients: A Simulation Study

Evidence-based venous thromboembolism (VTE) prevention among aesthetic patients is lacking. This study seeks to (1) quantify 2005 Caprini scores in primary breast augmentation patients, (2) determine the proportion of patients with potentially modifiable VTE risk factors, and (3) project, using Monte Carlo simulation, the expected distribution of Caprini scores among aesthetic surgery patients who develop VTE.

Methods

The observational study (part 1) screened consecutive primary breast augmentation patients for VTE risk using the 2005 Caprini score. Aggregate scores were compiled, and the proportion of patients with potentially modifiable risk factors were identified. Part 2 used Monte Carlo simulation to generate risk score distributions for VTE events predicted to occur among randomly sampled patient cohorts with baseline Caprini risk profiles derived from the part 1 data.

Results

One hundred patients had mean age of 35.7 years and mean body mass index of 23.8 kg/m2. Median 2005 Caprini score was 3 (range, 2-8), with the majority (96%) having scores of ≤6. Twenty-eight percent of patients had at least one potentially modifiable risk factor or risk factor potentially benefiting from further investigation. Monte Carlo simulations demonstrated that for a population with 96% Caprini ≤6 (and 4% Caprini ≥7), 80% of VTE events would be expected to occur in patients with Caprini scores ≤6.

Conclusions

The majority of breast augmentation patients in this study (96%) have 2005 Caprini scores ≤6. Twenty-eight percent of patients have potentially modifiable risk factors. The majority of patients with VTE after aesthetic surgery are expected to have lower Caprini risk scores.

Venous Thromboembolism Prophylaxis in Plastic Surgery Patients Undergoing Facelift

Background

In 2011, the American Society of Plastic Surgeons approved the Venous Thromboembolism (VTE) Task Force Report, which recommended the use of the Caprini scoring system, which has been adopted for VTE prophylaxis by most surgical societies in America.

Objectives

The aim of this study is to investigate the incidence of deep vein thrombosis (DVT) and pulmonary embolism (PE) in patients undergoing facelifts at a single institution who did not undergo VTE chemoprophylaxis based on the Caprini scoring system.

Methods

A retrospective chart review was conducted of patients who underwent facelift at a single institution. Patients were included if they were operated on between 2016 and 2021 by the lead surgeon and excluded if they received VTE prophylaxis. Descriptive statistics were conducted to analyze the collected data.

Results

In total, 136 patients were isolated after chart review, and no patients were found to have had DVT or VTE. The average Caprini score was 5.625 and ranged from 3 to 10. There were 3 patients with evidence of postoperative hematoma (Caprini score = 5, 5, 7). The overall hematoma percentage was 2.21%.

Conclusions

Based on the average Caprini score for the patients, all patients should have received VTE chemoprophylaxis. The authors found no VTE-related events in the patients without chemoprophylaxis. This study suggests that while the Caprini scoring system is a critical diagnostic tool for certain surgical procedures, it might not be optimal in predicting VTE in aesthetic patients undergoing surgical procedures.

Level of Evidence: 4

A Roadmap to Implementing Venous Thromboembolism Risk Stratification and Mitigation

INTRODUCTION

Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is a life-threatening postoperative complication that carries high morbidity and mortality for plastic surgery patients. In 2011, the American Society of Plastic Surgeons recommended the adoption of a VTE risk stratification and mitigation; however, successful implementation of VTE prophylaxis protocols has not been well described. To address and reduce the VTE burden at our academic center, a risk assessment protocol was implemented for patients undergoing outpatient plastic surgery procedures.

METHOD

All patients who received outpatient plastic surgery between August 2018 and July 2019 were eligible for the VTE modified Caprini risk assessment screening. Sampling of practice patterns was done by chart review from the first week of each month. The study was divided into 3 phases to assess the relationship of screening compliance rates with each protocol change. Compliance was defined as completion of VTE Caprini screening with documentation in patients' charts.

RESULTS

Over the 12-month study period, 277 patients met the inclusion criteria. From August to November 2018 (phase 1), patients were screened at the initial clinic visit with an average compliance rate of 11.1%. In December 2018 (phase 2), patients were screened on the day of surgery, with an average compliance rate of 47.1%. From January to July 2019 (phase 3), surgeons recorded the numerical Caprini score into the patient's electronic medical record with a subsequent compliance rate of 61.3%. The overall compliance during the 12 months was 44.8%. The median calculated Caprini score for this population was 4 (range, 1-7).

CONCLUSIONS

Standardization of VTE risk assessment is vital for patient safety and outcomes. Successful implementation and long-term protocol sustainability are not a simple goal. In this study, protocol compliance greatly improved after tailoring the guidelines to the specific institutional needs and workflow. These results reinforce the importance of continuous protocol review and modification to ensure optimal departmental buy-in and sustainability.

Optimal Dosing of Prophylactic Enoxaparin after Surgical Procedures: Results of the Double-Blind, Randomized, Controlled FIxed or Variable Enoxaparin (FIVE) Trial

BACKGROUND

The accepted "one-size-fits-all" dose strategy for prophylactic enoxaparin may not optimize the medication's risks and benefits after surgical procedures. The authors hypothesized that weight-based administration might improve the pharmacokinetics of prophylactic enoxaparin when compared to fixed-dose administration.

METHODS

The FIxed or Variable Enoxaparin (FIVE) trial was a randomized, double-blind trial that compared the pharmacokinetic and clinical outcomes of patients assigned randomly to postoperative venous thromboembolism prophylaxis using enoxaparin 40 mg twice daily or enoxaparin 0.5 mg/kg twice daily. Patients were randomized after surgery and received the first enoxaparin dose at 8 hours after surgery. Primary hypotheses were (1) weight-based administration is noninferior to a fixed dose for avoiding underanticoagulation (anti-factor Xa <0.2 IU/ml) and (2) weight-based administration is superior to fixed-dose administration for avoiding overanticoagulation (anti-factor Xa >0.4 IU/ml). Secondary endpoints were 90-day venous thromboembolism and bleeding.

RESULTS

In total, 295 patients were randomized, with 151 assigned to fixed-dose and 144 to weight-based administration of enoxaparin. For avoidance of under anticoagulation, weight-based administration had a greater effectiveness (79.9 percent versus 76.6 percent); the 3.3 percent (95 percent CI, -7.5 to 12.5 percent) greater effectiveness achieved statistically significant noninferiority relative to the a priori specified -12 percent noninferiority margin (p = 0.004). For avoidance of overanticoagulation, weight-based enoxaparin administration was superior to fixed-dose administration (90.6 percent versus 82.2 percent); the 8.4 percent (95 percent CI, 0.1 to 16.6 percent) greater effectiveness showed significant safety superiority (p = 0.046). Ninety-day venous thromboembolism and major bleeding were not different between fixed-dose and weight-based cohorts (0.66 percent versus 0.69 percent, p = 0.98; 3.3 percent versus 4.2 percent, p = 0.72, respectively).

CONCLUSION

Weight-based administration showed superior pharmacokinetics for avoidance of underanticoagulation and overanticoagulation in postoperative patients receiving prophylactic enoxaparin.

CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic, I.

A Novel Artificial Intelligence-assisted Risk Assessment Model for Preventing Complications in Esthetic Surgery

Prevention of complications to reduce morbidity and mortality, and improve patient satisfaction is of paramount importance to plastic surgeons. This study aimed to evaluate the predictive risk factors for complications and to validate a novel risk assessment model, using artificial intelligence.

METHODS

A retrospective review of esthetic surgery procedures performed by the author between 2015 and 2020 was conducted. The Pearson correlation test was used to analyze the risk factors and complications. Differences in the mean risk scores among the three risk groups were tested using one-way analysis of variance. Risk scoring was validated using a machine learning process with a support vector machine in a Google Colaboratory environment.

RESULTS

Of the 372 patients, 28 (7.5%) experienced complications. The Pearson correlation coefficients between the risk score and body mass index (BMI: 0.99), age (0.97), and Caprini score of 5 or more (0.98) were statistically significant (P < 0.01). The correlations between the risk scores and sex (-0.16, P = 0.58), smoking habit (-0.16, P = 0.58), or combined procedures (-0.16, P = 0.58) were not significant. Necrosis was significantly correlated with dehiscence (0.92, P = 0.003) and seroma (0.77, P = 0.041). The accuracy of the predictive model was 100% for the training sample and 97.3% for the test sample.

CONCLUSIONS

Body mass index, age, and the Caprini score were risk factors for complications following esthetic surgery. The proposed risk assessment system is a valid tool for improving eligibility and preventing complications.

The Safe Practice of Female Genital Plastic Surgery

The purpose of this article is to guide surgeons in the safe practice of female genital plastic surgery when the number of such cases is steadily increasing. A careful review of salient things to look for in the patient's motivation, medical history, and physical examination can help the surgeon wisely choose best candidates. The anatomy is described, with particular attention given to the variations not generally described in textbooks or articles. Descriptions are included for labiaplasty, including clitoral hood reduction, majoraplasty, monsplasty, and perineoplasty with vaginoplasty. Reduction of anesthetic risks, deep venous thromboses, and pulmonary emboli are discussed, with special consideration for avoidance of nerve injury and compartment syndrome. Postoperative care of a variety of vulvovaginal procedures is discussed. Videos showing anatomic variations and surgical techniques of common female genital procedures with recommendations to reduce the complication rate are included in the article.

Post-Bariatric Abdominoplasty: Analysis of 406 Cases With Focus on Risk Factors and Complications

BACKGROUND

Post-bariatric patients present a surgical challenge within abdominoplasty because of residual obesity and major comorbidities. In this study, we analyzed complications following abdominoplasty in post-bariatric patients and evaluated potential risk factors associated with these complications.

OBJECTIVES

The authors sought to determine the complications and risk factors following abdominoplasty in post-bariatric patients.

METHODS

A retrospective study of patients who underwent abdominoplasty was performed from January 2009 to December 2018 at our institution. Variables analyzed were sex, age, body mass index (BMI), smoking, surgical technique, operative time, resection weight, drain output, and complications.

RESULTS

A total of 406 patients were included in this study (320 female and 86 male) with a mean age of 44.4 years and a BMI of 30.6 kg/m2. Abdominoplasty techniques consisted of traditional (64.3%), fleur-de-lis technique (27.3%), and panniculectomy without umbilical displacement (8.4%). Overall complications recorded were 41.9%, the majority of these being wound-healing problems (32%). Minor and major complications were found in 29.1% and 12.8% of patients, respectively. A BMI value of ≥30 kg/m2 was associated with an increased risk for wound-healing problems (P = 0.001). The frequency of total complications was significantly related to age (P = 0.007), BMI (P = 0.004), and resection weight (P = 0.001). Abdominoplasty technique tended to influence total complications.

CONCLUSIONS

This study demonstrates in a fairly large sample of post-bariatric patients (n = 406) that abdominoplasty alone can be performed safely, with an acceptable complication rate. Age, BMI, and resection weight are shown to be significant risk factors for total complications. The role of surgical technique needs to be evaluated further.

Level of Evidence: 4.

Venous Thromboembolism Prophylaxis in Aesthetic Surgery: A Survey of Plastic Surgeons' Practices

BACKGROUND

Deep venous thrombosis and pulmonary embolism, collectively known as venous thromboembolism (VTE), are among the most feared yet preventable surgical complications. Although many recommendations exist to reduce the risk of VTE, the actual VTE prophylaxis practices of aesthetic plastic surgeons remain unknown.

OBJECTIVES

The primary aim of this study was to elucidate plastic surgeons' experiences with VTE, preferred VTE prophylaxis practices, and areas in which VTE prevention may be improved.

METHODS

Members of The Aesthetic Society were queried via a 55-question electronic survey regarding their experience with VTE as well as their VTE prophylaxis practices. Anonymous responses were collected and analyzed by the Mayo Clinic Survey Research Center.

RESULTS

The survey was sent to 1729 of The Aesthetic Society members, of whom 286 responded. Fifty percent, 38%, and 6% of respondents reported having had a patient develop a deep venous thrombosis, pulmonary embolism, or death secondary to VTE, respectively. Procedures performed on the back or trunk were associated with the highest rate of VTE. Lower extremity procedures were associated with a significantly higher rate of VTE than expected. Over 90% of respondents reported utilizing a patient risk stratification assessment tool. Although at least one-half of respondents reported that the surgical facility in which they operate maintains some form of VTE prophylaxis protocol, 39% self-reported nonadherence with these protocols.

CONCLUSIONS

Considerable variability exists in VTE prophylaxis practices among The Aesthetic Society responders. Future efforts should simplify guidelines and tailor prophylaxis recommendations to the aesthetic surgery population. Furthermore, education of plastic surgeons performing aesthetic surgery and more diligent surgical venue supervision is needed to narrow the gap between current recommendations and actual practices.

Safety in Female Genital Plastic Surgery

LEARNING OBJECTIVES

After studying this article, participants should be able to: (1) Identify the most appropriate type of anesthesia for the female genital plastic surgical patient and minimize risks of nerve injury and thromboembolic event through proper preoperative evaluation and knowledge of positioning. (2) Define the vulvovaginal anatomy, including common variants, and assess vulvovaginal tissues after childbirth and menopause. (3) Apply surgical techniques to minimize complications in female genital plastic surgery. (4) Classify the types of female genital mutilation/cutting and design methods of reconstruction after female genital mutilation/cutting.

SUMMARY

Female genital plastic surgery is growing in popularity and in numbers performed. This CME article covers several aspects of safety in the performance of these procedures. In choosing the best candidates, the impact of patient motivation, body mass index, parity, menopause and estrogen therapy is discussed. Under anesthesia, consideration for the risks associated with the dorsal lithotomy position and avoidance of compartment syndrome, nerve injury, deep venous thromboses, and pulmonary embolus are covered. Anatomical variations are discussed, as is the impact of childbirth on tissues and muscles. Surgical safety, avoidance of complications, and postoperative care of a variety of vulvovaginal procedures are discussed. Videos showing anatomical variations and surgical techniques of the most common female genital procedures with recommendations to reduce the complication rate are included in the article. Finally, female genital mutilation/cutting is defined, and treatment, avoidance of complications, and postoperative care are discussed.

Postoperative Venous Thromboembolism Prophylaxis Utilizing Enoxaparin Does Not Increase Bleeding Complications After Abdominal Body Contouring Surgery

BACKGROUND

Venous thromboembolism (VTE) chemoprophylaxis warrants an individualized, risk-stratified approach, and constitutes a relatively controversial topic in plastic surgery.

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study was to determine the safety of a 7-day postoperative enoxaparin regimen for VTE prophylaxis compared with a single preoperative dose of heparin in abdominal body contouring surgery.

METHODS

This single-institution pre-post study investigated the safety of a 7-day enoxaparin postoperative regimen in abdominal body contouring procedures performed by a single surgeon from 2007 to 2018. Four procedures were included: traditional panniculectomy, abdominoplasty, fleur-de-lis panniculectomy, and body contouring liposuction. Group I patients received a single dose of 5000 U subcutaneous heparin in the preoperative period, and no postoperative chemical prophylaxis was administered. Group II patients received 40 mg subcutaneous enoxaparin in the immediate preoperative period, then once daily for 7 days postoperatively.

RESULTS

A total of 195 patients were included in the study, 66 in Group I and 129 in Group II. The groups demonstrated statistically similar VTE risk profiles, based on the 2005 Caprini risk-assessment model. There were no statistically significant differences in the 2 primary outcomes: postoperative bleeding and VTE events. Group I patients had higher reoperation rates (22.7% vs 10.1%, P = 0.029), which was secondary to higher rates of revision procedures.

CONCLUSIONS

A 7-day postoperative course of once-daily enoxaparin for VTE risk reduction in abdominal body contouring surgery does not significantly increase the risk of bleeding. Implementation of this regimen for postdischarge chemoprophylaxis, when indicated following individualized risk stratification, is appropriate.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 4

Deep Venous Thrombosis Prophylaxis

Abdominoplasty is a commonly performed aesthetic procedure but has one of the highest risks for venous thromboembolism (VTE) events in aesthetic surgery. Surgeons can face challenging decisions when performing combination procedures and deciding on appropriate methods of VTE prophylaxis. This article summarizes the current evidence for the incidence of VTE events in abdominoplasty and abdominoplasty combined with other procedures, the current recommendations for risk stratification and management, and options available for mechanical and chemical VTE prophylaxis.

The Effect of Sequential Compression Devices on Fibrinolysis in Plastic Surgery Outpatients: A Randomized Trial

BACKGROUND

Sequential compression devices are often considered a mainstay of prophylaxis against deep venous thromboses in surgical patients. The devices are believed to produce a milking action on the deep veins to prevent venous stasis. A systemic fibrinolytic effect has also been proposed, adding a second mechanism of action. The plasma levels of tissue plasminogen activator and plasminogen activator inhibitor-1 reflect fibrinolytic activity.

METHODS

A randomized trial was conducted among 50 consecutive plastic surgery outpatients undergoing cosmetic surgery performed by the author under total intravenous anesthesia and without paralysis. Patients were randomized to receive calf-length sequential compression devices or no sequential compression devices during surgery. Blood samples were obtained from the upper extremity preoperatively and at hourly intervals until the patient was discharged from the postanesthesia care unit. Tissue plasminogen activator and plasminogen activator inhibitor-1 levels were measured. Ultrasound surveillance was used in all patients. There was no outside funding for the study.

RESULTS

All patients agreed to participate (inclusion rate, 100 percent). No patient developed clinical signs or ultrasound evidence of a deep venous thrombosis. There were no significant changes in tissue plasminogen activator levels or plasminogen activator inhibitor-1 levels from the preoperative measurements at any hourly interval and no differences in levels comparing patients treated with or without sequential compression devices.

CONCLUSIONS

No significant change in systemic fibrinolytic activity occurs during outpatient plastic surgery under total intravenous anesthesia. Sequential compression devices do not affect tissue plasminogen activator or plasminogen activator inhibitor-1 levels, suggesting no fibrinolytic benefit.

CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic, I.

Searching for the Best Way to Assess the Risk of Thrombosis in Aesthetic Plastic Surgery; The Role of the Caprini/Pannucci Score

INTRODUCTION

There is concern regarding the high incidence of thrombosis in plastic surgery patients. For this reason, we wanted to compare the results of the Caprini/Pannucci score in patients with and without a past history of thrombosis admitted for aesthetic plastic surgery.

METHODS

This was a case-control study of 152 patients undergoing aesthetic plastic surgery procedures. We formed two groups: Group I had 70 patients who had thrombosis after aesthetic plastic surgery and group II had 82 patients without thrombosis. We studied the considered risk factors for thrombosis. We weighted the factors according to the OR and linear regressions. We then related them to the Caprini/Pannucci score.

RESULTS

Patients in group I had a score of 5.68 versus 3.45 in group II (p < 0.001). There was a 9.86% increase in thrombosis for each increased point in the rating. A higher effectiveness of the Caprini score was found in the high-score group; the greatest flaw was in the low-scoring group. The sensitivity was 75.71%, and the specificity was 70.73%. The factors with the greatest impact were the infiltration of fat in the buttocks, degree of obesity and time of surgery. There was an increased risk of thrombosis in patients with gluteal fat injections, varicose veins, obesity and immune disorders as well as those who had previously given birth.

CONCLUSION

To increase the effectiveness of the score and to use the score as a basis on which to decide upon prophylactic care, it is necessary to modify the score and add some factors.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE III

This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .

Venous thromboembolism in plastic surgery: the current state of evidence in risk assessment and chemoprophylactic options

The application of venous thromboembolism (VTE) prophylaxis has been the topic of intense debate in plastic surgery. The overall incidence of VTE is low in plastic surgery patients as compared to other surgical subspecialties but may be higher in the inpatient rather than outpatient plastic surgery populations. The Caprini Risk Assessment Model is the most highly studied and validated tool to assess VTE risk in plastic surgery patients. However, the Caprini model lacks procedure-specific risk assessment and patient-specific risk factor calculations. Due to these limitations, such as the low incidence and the heterogeneous nature of the specialty, trials lacked the power to capture proof of benefit, except in the highest-risk inpatient population. The emerging use of aspirin and novel oral anticoagulants may provide an alternative, as noninferiority in terms of efficacy and safety has been demonstrated in other fields. In this review, the authors intend to summarize the current state of evidence for prevention and explore the modalities available for prophylaxis, including novel oral anticoagulants.