Fondaparinux Significantly Reduces Postoperative Venous Thromboembolism After Body Contouring Procedures Without an Increase in Bleeding Complications

An In-Depth Analysis of 1370 Consecutive Abdominoplasties: Fascial Plication Increases Risk of Venous Thromboembolism, and Scoring for Plication Improves the Caprini Risk Assessment Model

BACKGROUND

Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is the most dangerous complication of abdominoplasty. One relatively undefined risk factor is plication, which in theory increases VTE risk.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the thromboembolic risk of plication.

METHODS

A retrospective review of 1370 consecutive abdominoplasties by one surgeon was undertaken. Two groups were considered, plicated (n= 1089) and non-plicated (n = 281), and VTE rates were compared between these groups.

RESULTS

There were 25/1089 cases of VTE (2.3%) in plicated patients and 1/281 case of VTE (0.36%) in non-plicated patients, which was statistically significant (Fisher's exact test, p=0.028) despite the non-plicated group being a higher risk population. Case-Control matching yielded 225 pairs which differed statistically only by the presence or absence of plication; there were 12/225(5.3%) VTE events in the plicated group and 0/225 in the non-plicated group (McNemar's test, p=0.0015). Logistic regression demonstrated increased VTE risk with increasing age (OR 1.08, p<0.001), BMI (OR 1.34, p=0.002), Caprini score (OR 2.17, p<0.001), and especially plication (OR 16.76, p=0.008). Adding two points for plication to Caprini scores offered better risk stratification at a level of 7, with an improved combination of sensitivity/specificity (0.31/0.98 vs 0.69/0.96) and a 27% improvement over the 2005 Caprini RAM in the area under a Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) curve (0.826 vs 0.651, Z-value -3.596, p = 0.003).

CONCLUSIONS

Plication was shown to be a powerful risk factor for the development of VTE in abdominoplasty. Abdominal wall plication should be considered in risk assessment, and scoring for plication may improve the performance of the Caprini RAM.

Unfractionated Heparins, Low-Molecular-Weight Heparins, and Indirect Factor Xa Inhibitors in Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery: An Evidence-Based Review

SUMMARY

Venous thromboembolism can present with devastating complications and sequalae, particularly in the surgical patient. Current data support prophylactic anticoagulant use in high-risk hospitalized patients, defined as those with a Caprini Risk Assessment Model score of 7 or greater. The most frequently used chemoprophylaxis agents include unfractionated heparin, low-molecular-weight heparin, and indirect factor Xa inhibitors. The authors review the mechanisms of action, metabolism, reversal agents, indications, contraindications, advantages, and disadvantages of these medications in plastic and reconstructive surgery.

Literature Review: Venous Thromboembolism Prophylaxis in Plastic Surgery

Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is a postoperative complication experienced in all branches of surgery, including plastic surgery. Its occurrence can be lowered with adequate prophylaxis in the light of the patient's risk category and the type of surgery that will be performed. Nevertheless, thromboembolic prophylaxis is not routinely administered in plastic surgery. The prevention of VTE has gained significant attention in the past 5 years due to increased knowledge about the disease process and the alarming incidence rates. This literature review is specifically aimed at carrying out a synopsis of VTE prophylaxis trials conducted on plastic surgery patients. Antithrombotic agents have generally been avoided by plastic surgeons due to the increased risk of bleeding or hematomas; however, the prevalence of clinically important bleeding has not been found to increase with their use, as it emerges from numerous studies. VTE events can lead to increased morbidity and mortality rates, as well as a rise in healthcare costs. As it emerges from multiple studies, as a preventive measure against VTE, it is strongly advised to use mechanical prophylaxis along with low-molecular-weight heparin as the primary treatment option for plastic surgery patients who are at a greater risk. Up to date though, this practice is not commonly embraced by physicians. Preventing VTE is crucial, and measures to do so are necessary. However, there is no clear evidence to support the use of anticoagulation for plastic surgery patients, and some surgeons are hesitant to use it due to potential bleeding in extensive dissection areas.Level of Evidence III This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .

Efficacy and Safety Study of Low-Molecular-Weight Heparin and Fondaparinux Sodium After Hip Arthroplasty: A Retrospective Cohort Study

Background

Low molecular heparin(LMWH) and sodium sulfadiazine heparin(FPX) are commonly used to prevent deep vein thrombosis(DVT) after total hip arthroplasty(THA). In this study, we compared the role of these drugs in preventing DVT after THA.

Methods

Patients who underwent unilateral THA at the Sixth Affiliated Hospital of Xinjiang Medical University from April 2020 to December 2022 were retrospectively analyzed for inclusion in this study. According to the anticoagulant drugs used, the patients were divided into LMWH group (n=106) and FPX group (n=97). Changes in perioperative coagulation-related indices, hemoglobin, blood loss And the postoperative complications.

Results

The preoperative indexes of the two groups of patients, the difference was not statistically significant (P>0.05); the indexes of Intraoperative blood loss, Visible blood loss, Hidden blood loss, and Total blood loss of the two groups of patients were compared, and the difference was not significant (P>0.05); PT activity and INR in the LMWH group were significantly lower than those in the FPX group on the 1st and 5th postoperative days, and the differences were significant (P<0.05); Platelets, Hemoglobin, Hematocrit, D-dimer, and Fibrinogen were compared between the two groups on the 1st and 5th postoperative days, and the differences were not significant (P<0.05). The differences were not significant (P>0.05). The differences in blood transfusion rate and blood volume between the two groups were not significant (P>0.05); the total hospitalization cost of the LMWH group was significantly lower than that of the FPX group, and the difference was significant (P<0.05); and the differences in the incidence of postoperative complications between the two groups were not significant (P>0.05).

Conclusion

In this study, we found that the efficacy and safety of FPX and LMWH in preventing VTE after THA were basically the same, and the total cost of hospitalization in the LMWH group was significantly lower than that in the FPX group; however, due to the limited inclusion of the sample size, high-quality, large-sample, long-term follow-up clinical studies are necessary.

The Majority of Venous Thromboembolism Events Should Occur in Lower Risk Aesthetic Surgery Patients: A Simulation Study

Evidence-based venous thromboembolism (VTE) prevention among aesthetic patients is lacking. This study seeks to (1) quantify 2005 Caprini scores in primary breast augmentation patients, (2) determine the proportion of patients with potentially modifiable VTE risk factors, and (3) project, using Monte Carlo simulation, the expected distribution of Caprini scores among aesthetic surgery patients who develop VTE.

Methods

The observational study (part 1) screened consecutive primary breast augmentation patients for VTE risk using the 2005 Caprini score. Aggregate scores were compiled, and the proportion of patients with potentially modifiable risk factors were identified. Part 2 used Monte Carlo simulation to generate risk score distributions for VTE events predicted to occur among randomly sampled patient cohorts with baseline Caprini risk profiles derived from the part 1 data.

Results

One hundred patients had mean age of 35.7 years and mean body mass index of 23.8 kg/m2. Median 2005 Caprini score was 3 (range, 2-8), with the majority (96%) having scores of ≤6. Twenty-eight percent of patients had at least one potentially modifiable risk factor or risk factor potentially benefiting from further investigation. Monte Carlo simulations demonstrated that for a population with 96% Caprini ≤6 (and 4% Caprini ≥7), 80% of VTE events would be expected to occur in patients with Caprini scores ≤6.

Conclusions

The majority of breast augmentation patients in this study (96%) have 2005 Caprini scores ≤6. Twenty-eight percent of patients have potentially modifiable risk factors. The majority of patients with VTE after aesthetic surgery are expected to have lower Caprini risk scores.

Safety of Rivaroxaban for Postoperative Venous Thromboembolism Prophylaxis Following Abdominal Body Contouring Surgery: 600 Patients

BACKGROUND

Reducing the incidence of venous thromboembolism (VTE) following abdominal body contouring surgery remains a top priority for patient safety. There is a lack of consensus regarding the optimal chemoprophylactic agent for postoperative VTE prophylaxis, and the role of oral anticoagulants warrants further investigation.

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this multisurgeon, single-institution study was to determine the safety and efficacy of a 7-day postoperative rivaroxaban regimen for VTE prophylaxis in abdominal body contouring surgery.

METHODS

A retrospective chart review was performed of all patients who underwent abdominoplasty, circumferential body lift, fleur-de-lis panniculectomy, or circumferential fleur-de-lis panniculectomy at our surgical center from August 2014 to November 2019. A 7-day postoperative course of once-daily 10 mg rivaroxaban, starting on postoperative day 1, was administered to every patient unless there was a contraindication. The 2 primary endpoints were the incidence of VTE and bleeding events.

RESULTS

A total of 600 patients were included in the study. There were no deaths. There were 4 (0.7%) incidents of VTE events: 2 (0.3%) patients suffered pulmonary embolus and 2 (0.3%) patients suffered a lower-extremity deep venous thrombosis. A total of 13 (2.2%) patients suffered complications related to bleeding. Of these, operative intervention for control and evacuation was required in 7 (1.2%) patients.

CONCLUSIONS

A 7-day postoperative course of once-daily rivaroxaban for VTE risk reduction in abdominal body contouring surgery is associated with a low incidence of VTE events and a low risk of bleeding complications.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 4

Standards and Trends in Lipoabdominoplasty

BACKGROUND

Lipoabdominoplasty has evolved over the last 6 decades through contributions from numerous luminaries in plastic and reconstructive surgery.

METHODS

The authors review historical perspective and provide a contemporary examination of trends in lipoabdominoplasty.

RESULTS

In 1967, Pitanguy popularized abdominoplasty (without liposuction) as a technique for augmenting ventral hernias repairs and subsequently for aesthetic improvement of the abdomen. After the introduction of suction assisted lipectomy by Illouz in 1983, abdominoplasty became a central tool in a diverse armamentarium of anterior and lateral abdominal wall contouring procedures. Liposuction was initially utilized with mini-abdominoplasty in order to improve contour. Subsequently, Matarasso advanced the safe combination of liposuction with full abdominoplasty. Additionally, he systematized the variety of cutaneous undermining, excision, and liposuction procedures utilized in abdominal contouring as indicated by the degree of skin laxity and musculofascial diastasis. Lockwood advocated high lateral tension closure of the superficial fascial system of the abdomen to improve the contour of the hips and flanks. Saldanha advanced selective undermining and anterior abdominal wall perforator preservation to minimize wound healing and seroma complications associated with lipoabdominoplasty procedures.

CONCLUSION

In abdominal contour surgery, surgeons can rely on classic techniques and algorithms that have withstood the test of time while modifying their approaches with advances backed by compelling and rigorously obtained evidence.