CLIP: accurate prediction of disordered linear interacting peptides from protein sequences using co-evolutionary information

Zmiz1 is a novel regulator of brain development associated with autism and intellectual disability

Neurodevelopmental disorders (NDDs) are a class of pathologies arising from perturbations in brain circuit formation and maturation with complex etiological triggers often classified as environmental and genetic. Neuropsychiatric conditions such as autism spectrum disorders (ASD), intellectual disability (ID), and attention deficit hyperactivity disorders (ADHD) are common NDDs characterized by their hereditary underpinnings and inherent heterogeneity. Genetic risk factors for NDDs are increasingly being identified in non-coding regions and proteins bound to them, including transcriptional regulators and chromatin remodelers. Importantly, de novo mutations are emerging as important contributors to NDDs and neuropsychiatric disorders. Recently, de novo mutations in transcriptional co-factor Zmiz1 or its regulatory regions have been identified in unrelated patients with syndromic ID and ASD. However, the role of Zmiz1 in brain development is unknown. Here, using publicly available databases and a Zmiz1 mutant mouse model, we reveal that Zmiz1 is highly expressed during embryonic brain development in mice and humans, and though broadly expressed across the brain, Zmiz1 is enriched in areas prominently impacted in ID and ASD such as cortex, hippocampus, and cerebellum. We investigated the relationship between Zmiz1 structure and pathogenicity of protein variants, the epigenetic marks associated with Zmiz1 regulation, and protein interactions and signaling pathways regulated by Zmiz1. Our analysis reveals that Zmiz1 regulates multiple developmental processes, including neurogenesis, neuron connectivity, and synaptic signaling. This work paves the way for future studies on the functions of Zmiz1 and highlights the importance of combining analysis of mouse models and human data.

CoMemMoRFPred: Sequence-based Prediction of MemMoRFs by Combining Predictors of Intrinsic Disorder, MoRFs and Disordered Lipid-binding Regions

Molecular recognition features (MoRFs) are a commonly occurring type of intrinsically disordered regions (IDRs) that undergo disorder-to-order transition upon binding to partner molecules. We focus on recently characterized and functionally important membrane-binding MoRFs (MemMoRFs). Motivated by the lack of computational tools that predict MemMoRFs, we use a dataset of experimentally annotated MemMoRFs to conceptualize, design, evaluate and release an accurate sequence-based predictor. We rely on state-of-the-art tools that predict residues that possess key characteristics of MemMoRFs, such as intrinsic disorder, disorder-to-order transition and lipid-binding. We identify and combine results from three tools that include flDPnn for the disorder prediction, DisoLipPred for the prediction of disordered lipid-binding regions, and MoRFCHiBiLight for the prediction of disorder-to-order transitioning protein binding regions. Our empirical analysis demonstrates that combining results produced by these three methods generates accurate predictions of MemMoRFs. We also show that use of a smoothing operator produces predictions that closely mimic the number and sizes of the native MemMoRF regions. The resulting CoMemMoRFPred method is available as an easy-to-use webserver at http://biomine.cs.vcu.edu/servers/CoMemMoRFPred. This tool will aid future studies of MemMoRFs in the context of exploring their abundance, cellular functions, and roles in pathologic phenomena.

Comparative evaluation of AlphaFold2 and disorder predictors for prediction of intrinsic disorder, disorder content and fully disordered proteins

We expand studies of AlphaFold2 (AF2) in the context of intrinsic disorder prediction by comparing it against a broad selection of 20 accurate, popular and recently released disorder predictors. We use 25% larger benchmark dataset with 646 proteins and cover protein-level predictions of disorder content and fully disordered proteins. AF2-based disorder predictions secure a relatively high Area Under receiver operating characteristic Curve (AUC) of 0.77 and are statistically outperformed by several modern disorder predictors that secure AUCs around 0.8 with median runtime of about 20 s compared to 1200 s for AF2. Moreover, AF2 provides modestly accurate predictions of fully disordered proteins (F1 = 0.59 vs. 0.91 for the best disorder predictor) and disorder content (mean absolute error of 0.21 vs. 0.15). AF2 also generates statistically more accurate disorder predictions for about 20% of proteins that have relatively short sequences and a few disordered regions that tend to be located at the sequence termini, and which are absent of disordered protein-binding regions. Interestingly, AF2 and the most accurate disorder predictors rely on deep neural networks, suggesting that these models are useful for protein structure and disorder predictions.

Overview Update: Computational Prediction of Intrinsic Disorder in Proteins

There are over 100 computational predictors of intrinsic disorder. These methods predict amino acid-level propensities for disorder directly from protein sequences. The propensities can be used to annotate putative disordered residues and regions. This unit provides a practical and holistic introduction to the sequence-based intrinsic disorder prediction. We define intrinsic disorder, explain the format of computational prediction of disorder, and identify and describe several accurate predictors. We also introduce recently released databases of intrinsic disorder predictions and use an illustrative example to provide insights into how predictions should be interpreted and combined. Lastly, we summarize key experimental methods that can be used to validate computational predictions. © 2023 Wiley Periodicals LLC.

Computational Prediction of Protein Intrinsically Disordered Region Related Interactions and Functions

Intrinsically Disordered Proteins (IDPs) and Regions (IDRs) exist widely. Although without well-defined structures, they participate in many important biological processes. In addition, they are also widely related to human diseases and have become potential targets in drug discovery. However, there is a big gap between the experimental annotations related to IDPs/IDRs and their actual number. In recent decades, the computational methods related to IDPs/IDRs have been developed vigorously, including predicting IDPs/IDRs, the binding modes of IDPs/IDRs, the binding sites of IDPs/IDRs, and the molecular functions of IDPs/IDRs according to different tasks. In view of the correlation between these predictors, we have reviewed these prediction methods uniformly for the first time, summarized their computational methods and predictive performance, and discussed some problems and perspectives.