1
|
Shahidi N, Pan M, Tran K, Crampin EJ, Nickerson DP. SBML to bond graphs: From conversion to composition. Math Biosci 2022; 352:108901. [PMID: 36096376 DOI: 10.1016/j.mbs.2022.108901] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/29/2022] [Revised: 08/15/2022] [Accepted: 09/05/2022] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
The Systems Biology Markup Language (SBML) is a popular software-independent XML-based format for describing models of biological phenomena. The BioModels Database is the largest online repository of SBML models. Several tools and platforms are available to support the reuse and composition of SBML models. However, these tools do not explicitly assess whether models are physically plausible or thermodynamically consistent. This often leads to ill-posed models that are physically impossible, impeding the development of realistic complex models in biology. Here, we present a framework that can automatically convert SBML models into bond graphs, which imposes energy conservation laws on these models. The new bond graph models are easily mergeable, resulting in physically plausible coupled models. We illustrate this by automatically converting and coupling a model of pyruvate distribution to a model of the pentose phosphate pathway.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Niloofar Shahidi
- Auckland Bioengineering Institute, University of Auckland, Auckland, 1010, New Zealand.
| | - Michael Pan
- Systems Biology Laboratory, School of Mathematics and Statistics, and Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, 3010, Victoria, Australia; School of Mathematics and Statistics, Faculty of Science, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, 3010, Victoria, Australia
| | - Kenneth Tran
- Auckland Bioengineering Institute, University of Auckland, Auckland, 1010, New Zealand
| | - Edmund J Crampin
- Systems Biology Laboratory, School of Mathematics and Statistics, and Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, 3010, Victoria, Australia; School of Mathematics and Statistics, Faculty of Science, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, 3010, Victoria, Australia; ARC Centre of Excellence in Convergent Bio-Nano Science and Technology, Faculty of Engineering and Information Technology, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, 3010, Victoria, Australia; School of Medicine, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, 3010, Victoria, Australia
| | - David P Nickerson
- Auckland Bioengineering Institute, University of Auckland, Auckland, 1010, New Zealand
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Shin W, Hellerstein JL. Isolating structural errors in reaction networks in systems biology. Bioinformatics 2021; 37:388-395. [PMID: 32790862 PMCID: PMC8058775 DOI: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btaa720] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/30/2019] [Revised: 07/10/2020] [Accepted: 08/07/2020] [Indexed: 11/14/2022] Open
Abstract
MOTIVATION The growing complexity of reaction-based models necessitates early detection and resolution of model errors. Considerable work has been done on the detection of mass balance errors, especially atomic mass analysis (AMA) (which compares the counts of atoms in the reactants and products) and Linear Programming analysis (which detects stoichiometric inconsistencies). This article extends model error checking to include: (i) certain structural errors in reaction networks and (ii) error isolation. First, we consider the balance of chemical structures (moieties) between reactants and products. This balance is expected in many biochemical reactions, but the imbalance of chemical structures cannot be detected if the analysis is done in units of atomic masses. Second, we improve on error isolation for stoichiometric inconsistencies by identifying a small number of reactions and/or species that cause the error. Doing so simplifies error remediation. RESULTS We propose two algorithms that address isolating structural errors in reaction networks. Moiety analysis finds imbalances of moieties using the same algorithm as AMA, but moiety analysis works in units of moieties instead of atomic masses. We argue for the value of checking moiety balance, and discuss two approaches to decomposing chemical species into moieties. Graphical Analysis of Mass Equivalence Sets (GAMES) provides isolation for stoichiometric inconsistencies by constructing explanations that relate errors in the structure of the reaction network to elements of the reaction network. We study the effectiveness of moiety analysis and GAMES on curated models in the BioModels repository. We have created open source codes for moiety analysis and GAMES. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION Our project is hosted at https://github.com/ModelEngineering/SBMLLint, which contains examples, documentation, source code files and build scripts used to create SBMLLint. Our source code is licensed under the MIT open source license. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Woosub Shin
- eScience Institute, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195-5061, USA.,Department of Bioinformatics - BiGCaT, NUTRIM, Maastricht University, 6229 ER Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | | |
Collapse
|
3
|
Troják M, Šafránek D, Mertová L, Brim L. Executable biochemical space for specification and analysis of biochemical systems. PLoS One 2020; 15:e0238838. [PMID: 32915842 PMCID: PMC7485897 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0238838] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/04/2020] [Accepted: 08/25/2020] [Indexed: 01/28/2023] Open
Abstract
Computational systems biology provides multiple formalisms for modelling of biochemical processes among which the rule-based approach is one of the most suitable. Its main advantage is a compact and precise mechanistic description of complex processes. However, state-of-the-art rule-based languages still suffer several shortcomings that limit their use in practice. In particular, the elementary (low-level) syntax and semantics of rule-based languages complicate model construction and maintenance for users outside computer science. On the other hand, mathematical models based on differential equations (ODEs) still make the most typical used modelling framework. In consequence, robust re-interpretation and integration of models are difficult, thus making the systems biology paradigm technically challenging. Though several high-level languages have been developed at the top of rule-based principles, none of them provides a satisfactory and complete solution for semi-automated description and annotation of heterogeneous biophysical processes integrated at the cellular level. We present the second generation of a rule-based language called Biochemical Space Language (BCSL) that combines the advantages of different approaches and thus makes an effort to overcome several problems of existing solutions. BCSL relies on the formal basis of the rule-based methodology while preserving user-friendly syntax of plain chemical equations. BCSL combines the following aspects: the level of abstraction that hides structural and quantitative details but yet gives a precise mechanistic view of systems dynamics; executable semantics allowing formal analysis and consistency checking at the level of the language; universality allowing the integration of different biochemical mechanisms; scalability and compactness of the specification; hierarchical specification and composability of chemical entities; and support for genome-scale annotation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Matej Troják
- Systems Biology Laboratory, Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic
| | - David Šafránek
- Systems Biology Laboratory, Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic
| | - Lukrécia Mertová
- Systems Biology Laboratory, Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic
| | - Luboš Brim
- Systems Biology Laboratory, Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Lang PF, Chebaro Y, Zheng X, P Sekar JA, Shaikh B, Natale DA, Karr JR. BpForms and BcForms: a toolkit for concretely describing non-canonical polymers and complexes to facilitate global biochemical networks. Genome Biol 2020; 21:117. [PMID: 32423472 PMCID: PMC7236495 DOI: 10.1186/s13059-020-02025-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/15/2019] [Accepted: 04/16/2020] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Non-canonical residues, caps, crosslinks, and nicks are important to many functions of DNAs, RNAs, proteins, and complexes. However, we do not fully understand how networks of such non-canonical macromolecules generate behavior. One barrier is our limited formats for describing macromolecules. To overcome this barrier, we develop BpForms and BcForms, a toolkit for representing the primary structure of macromolecules as combinations of residues, caps, crosslinks, and nicks. The toolkit can help omics researchers perform quality control and exchange information about macromolecules, help systems biologists assemble global models of cells that encompass processes such as post-translational modification, and help bioengineers design cells.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Paul F Lang
- Icahn Institute for Data Science and Genomic Technology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, 10029, NY, USA
- Department of Genetics and Genomic Sciences, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, 10029, NY, USA
- Department of Biochemistry, University of Oxford, South Parks Road, Oxford, OX1 3QU, UK
| | - Yassmine Chebaro
- Icahn Institute for Data Science and Genomic Technology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, 10029, NY, USA
- Department of Genetics and Genomic Sciences, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, 10029, NY, USA
- Institut de Génétique et de Biologie Moléculaire et Cellulaire, Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, Université de Strasbourg, Illkirch, 67404, France
| | - Xiaoyue Zheng
- Icahn Institute for Data Science and Genomic Technology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, 10029, NY, USA
- Department of Genetics and Genomic Sciences, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, 10029, NY, USA
| | - John A P Sekar
- Icahn Institute for Data Science and Genomic Technology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, 10029, NY, USA
- Department of Genetics and Genomic Sciences, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, 10029, NY, USA
| | - Bilal Shaikh
- Icahn Institute for Data Science and Genomic Technology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, 10029, NY, USA
- Department of Genetics and Genomic Sciences, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, 10029, NY, USA
| | - Darren A Natale
- Protein Information Resource, Georgetown University Medical Center, Washington, DC, 20007, USA
| | - Jonathan R Karr
- Icahn Institute for Data Science and Genomic Technology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, 10029, NY, USA.
- Department of Genetics and Genomic Sciences, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, 10029, NY, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Mısırlı G, Taylor R, Goñi-Moreno A, McLaughlin JA, Myers C, Gennari JH, Lord P, Wipat A. SBOL-OWL: An Ontological Approach for Formal and Semantic Representation of Synthetic Biology Information. ACS Synth Biol 2019; 8:1498-1514. [PMID: 31059645 DOI: 10.1021/acssynbio.8b00532] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/30/2022]
Abstract
Standard representation of data is key for the reproducibility of designs in synthetic biology. The Synthetic Biology Open Language (SBOL) has already emerged as a data standard to represent information about genetic circuits, and it is based on capturing data using graphs. The language provides the syntax using a free text document that is accessible to humans only. This paper describes SBOL-OWL, an ontology for a machine understandable definition of SBOL. This ontology acts as a semantic layer for genetic circuit designs. As a result, computational tools can understand the meaning of design entities in addition to parsing structured SBOL data. SBOL-OWL not only describes how genetic circuits can be constructed computationally, it also facilitates the use of several existing Semantic Web tools for synthetic biology. This paper demonstrates some of these features, for example, to validate designs and check for inconsistencies. Through the use of SBOL-OWL, queries can be simplified and become more intuitive. Moreover, existing reasoners can be used to infer information about genetic circuit designs that cannot be directly retrieved using existing querying mechanisms. This ontological representation of the SBOL standard provides a new perspective to the verification, representation, and querying of information about genetic circuits and is important to incorporate complex design information via the integration of biological ontologies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Göksel Mısırlı
- School of Computing and Mathematics, Keele University, Keele, Staffordshire ST5 5BG, UK
| | - Renee Taylor
- School of Computing and Mathematics, Keele University, Keele, Staffordshire ST5 5BG, UK
| | - Angel Goñi-Moreno
- School of Computing, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne NE4 5TG, UK
| | | | - Chris Myers
- Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah 84112, United States
| | - John H. Gennari
- Department of Biomedical Informatics and Medical Education, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington 98195, United States
| | - Phillip Lord
- School of Computing, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne NE4 5TG, UK
| | - Anil Wipat
- School of Computing, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne NE4 5TG, UK
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Neal ML, König M, Nickerson D, Mısırlı G, Kalbasi R, Dräger A, Atalag K, Chelliah V, Cooling MT, Cook DL, Crook S, de Alba M, Friedman SH, Garny A, Gennari JH, Gleeson P, Golebiewski M, Hucka M, Juty N, Myers C, Olivier BG, Sauro HM, Scharm M, Snoep JL, Touré V, Wipat A, Wolkenhauer O, Waltemath D. Harmonizing semantic annotations for computational models in biology. Brief Bioinform 2019; 20:540-550. [PMID: 30462164 PMCID: PMC6433895 DOI: 10.1093/bib/bby087] [Citation(s) in RCA: 33] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/15/2018] [Revised: 08/08/2018] [Accepted: 08/17/2018] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Life science researchers use computational models to articulate and test hypotheses about the behavior of biological systems. Semantic annotation is a critical component for enhancing the interoperability and reusability of such models as well as for the integration of the data needed for model parameterization and validation. Encoded as machine-readable links to knowledge resource terms, semantic annotations describe the computational or biological meaning of what models and data represent. These annotations help researchers find and repurpose models, accelerate model composition and enable knowledge integration across model repositories and experimental data stores. However, realizing the potential benefits of semantic annotation requires the development of model annotation standards that adhere to a community-based annotation protocol. Without such standards, tool developers must account for a variety of annotation formats and approaches, a situation that can become prohibitively cumbersome and which can defeat the purpose of linking model elements to controlled knowledge resource terms. Currently, no consensus protocol for semantic annotation exists among the larger biological modeling community. Here, we report on the landscape of current annotation practices among the COmputational Modeling in BIology NEtwork community and provide a set of recommendations for building a consensus approach to semantic annotation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maxwell Lewis Neal
- Seattle Children’s Research Institute, Center for Global Infectious Disease Research, Seattle, USA
| | - Matthias König
- Department of Biology, Humboldt-University Berlin, Institute for Theoretical Biology, Berlin, Germany
| | - David Nickerson
- Auckland Bioengineering Institute, University of Auckland, Auckland, NZ
| | - Göksel Mısırlı
- School of Computing and Mathematics, Keele University, Keele, UK
| | - Reza Kalbasi
- Auckland Bioengineering Institute, University of Auckland, Auckland, NZ
| | - Andreas Dräger
- Computational Systems Biology of Infection and Antimicrobial-Resistant Pathogens, Center for Bioinformatics Tübingen (ZBIT), University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
- Department of Computer Science, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Koray Atalag
- Auckland Bioengineering Institute, University of Auckland, Auckland, NZ
| | - Vijayalakshmi Chelliah
- European Molecular Biology Laboratory, European Bioinformatics Institute (EMBL-EBI), Wellcome Genome Campus, Hinxton, Cambridge, UK
| | - Michael T Cooling
- Auckland Bioengineering Institute, University of Auckland, Auckland, NZ
| | - Daniel L Cook
- Department of Physiology and Biophysics, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
- Department of Biomedical Informatics and Medical Education, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Sharon Crook
- School of Mathematical and Statistical Sciences, Arizona State University, Tempe, USA
| | - Miguel de Alba
- German Federal Institute for Risk Assessment, Berlin, Germany
| | | | - Alan Garny
- Auckland Bioengineering Institute, University of Auckland, Auckland, NZ
| | - John H Gennari
- Department of Biomedical Informatics and Medical Education, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Padraig Gleeson
- Department of Neuroscience, Physiology and Pharmacology, University College London, London, UK
| | - Martin Golebiewski
- Heidelberg Institute for Theoretical Studies (HITS gGmbH), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Michael Hucka
- Department of Computing and Mathematical Sciences, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA, USA
| | - Nick Juty
- European Molecular Biology Laboratory, European Bioinformatics Institute (EMBL-EBI), Wellcome Genome Campus, Hinxton, Cambridge, UK
| | - Chris Myers
- Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
| | - Brett G Olivier
- Systems Bioinformatics, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Modelling of Biological Processes, BioQUANT/COS, Heidelberg University, Germany
| | - Herbert M Sauro
- Department of Bioengineering, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Martin Scharm
- Department of Systems Biology and Bioinformatics, University of Rostock, Rostock, Germany
| | - Jacky L Snoep
- Department of Biochemistry, Stellenbosch University, Matieland, South Africa
- Department of Molecular Cell Physiology, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Manchester Institute for Biotechnology, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - Vasundra Touré
- Department of Biology, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway
| | - Anil Wipat
- School of Computing Science, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | - Olaf Wolkenhauer
- Department of Systems Biology and Bioinformatics, University of Rostock, Rostock, Germany
- Stellenbosch Institute for Advanced Study (STIAS), Stellenbosch, South Africa
| | - Dagmar Waltemath
- Department of Systems Biology and Bioinformatics, University of Rostock, Rostock, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Stanford NJ, Scharm M, Dobson PD, Golebiewski M, Hucka M, Kothamachu VB, Nickerson D, Owen S, Pahle J, Wittig U, Waltemath D, Goble C, Mendes P, Snoep J. Data Management in Computational Systems Biology: Exploring Standards, Tools, Databases, and Packaging Best Practices. Methods Mol Biol 2019; 2049:285-314. [PMID: 31602618 DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4939-9736-7_17] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
Computational systems biology involves integrating heterogeneous datasets in order to generate models. These models can assist with understanding and prediction of biological phenomena. Generating datasets and integrating them into models involves a wide range of scientific expertise. As a result these datasets are often collected by one set of researchers, and exchanged with others researchers for constructing the models. For this process to run smoothly the data and models must be FAIR-findable, accessible, interoperable, and reusable. In order for data and models to be FAIR they must be structured in consistent and predictable ways, and described sufficiently for other researchers to understand them. Furthermore, these data and models must be shared with other researchers, with appropriately controlled sharing permissions, before and after publication. In this chapter we explore the different data and model standards that assist with structuring, describing, and sharing. We also highlight the popular standards and sharing databases within computational systems biology.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Martin Scharm
- Department of Systems Biology and Bioinformatics, University of Rostock, Rostock, Germany
| | - Paul D Dobson
- School of Computer Science, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - Martin Golebiewski
- Heidelberg Institute for Theoretical Studies (HITS), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Michael Hucka
- Computing and Mathematical Sciences, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA, USA
| | | | - David Nickerson
- Auckland Bioengineering Institute, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand
| | - Stuart Owen
- School of Computer Science, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - Jürgen Pahle
- BIOMS/BioQuant, Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany.
| | - Ulrike Wittig
- Heidelberg Institute for Theoretical Studies (HITS), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Dagmar Waltemath
- Medical Informatics, University Medicine Greifswald, Greifswald, Germany
| | - Carole Goble
- School of Computer Science, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - Pedro Mendes
- Centre for Quantitative Medicine, University of Connecticut, Farmington, CT, USA
| | - Jacky Snoep
- School of Computer Science, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.,Biochemistry, Stellenbosch University, Stellenbosch, South Africa
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Waites W, Mısırlı G, Cavaliere M, Danos V, Wipat A. A Genetic Circuit Compiler: Generating Combinatorial Genetic Circuits with Web Semantics and Inference. ACS Synth Biol 2018; 7:2812-2823. [PMID: 30408409 PMCID: PMC6305556 DOI: 10.1021/acssynbio.8b00201] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/09/2023]
Abstract
A central strategy of synthetic biology is to understand the basic processes of living creatures through engineering organisms using the same building blocks. Biological machines described in terms of parts can be studied by computer simulation in any of several languages or robotically assembled in vitro. In this paper we present a language, the Genetic Circuit Description Language (GCDL) and a compiler, the Genetic Circuit Compiler (GCC). This language describes genetic circuits at a level of granularity appropriate both for automated assembly in the laboratory and deriving simulation code. The GCDL follows Semantic Web practice, and the compiler makes novel use of the logical inference facilities that are therefore available. We present the GCDL and compiler structure as a study of a tool for generating κ-language simulations from semantic descriptions of genetic circuits.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- William Waites
- School
of Informatics, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh EH8 9YL, U.K.,E-mail:
| | - Göksel Mısırlı
- School
of Computing and Mathematics, Keele University, Newcastle ST5 5BG, U.K.
| | - Matteo Cavaliere
- School
of Computing & Mathematics, Manchester
Metropolitan University, Manchester M15 6BH, U.K.
| | - Vincent Danos
- School
of Informatics, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh EH8 9YL, U.K.,École
Normale Supérieure, Paris, CNRS, 75005 Paris, France
| | - Anil Wipat
- School
of Computing Science, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne NE1
7RU, U.K.
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Harris LA, Hogg JS, Tapia JJ, Sekar JAP, Gupta S, Korsunsky I, Arora A, Barua D, Sheehan RP, Faeder JR. BioNetGen 2.2: advances in rule-based modeling. Bioinformatics 2016; 32:3366-3368. [PMID: 27402907 DOI: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btw469] [Citation(s) in RCA: 121] [Impact Index Per Article: 15.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/01/2015] [Accepted: 06/27/2016] [Indexed: 12/18/2022] Open
Abstract
: BioNetGen is an open-source software package for rule-based modeling of complex biochemical systems. Version 2.2 of the software introduces numerous new features for both model specification and simulation. Here, we report on these additions, discussing how they facilitate the construction, simulation and analysis of larger and more complex models than previously possible. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION Stable BioNetGen releases (Linux, Mac OS/X and Windows), with documentation, are available at http://bionetgen.org Source code is available at http://github.com/RuleWorld/bionetgen CONTACT: bionetgen.help@gmail.comSupplementary information: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Leonard A Harris
- Department of Computational and Systems Biology, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Justin S Hogg
- Department of Computational and Systems Biology, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - José-Juan Tapia
- Department of Computational and Systems Biology, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - John A P Sekar
- Department of Computational and Systems Biology, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Sanjana Gupta
- Department of Computational and Systems Biology, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Ilya Korsunsky
- Department of Computational and Systems Biology, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Arshi Arora
- Department of Computational and Systems Biology, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Dipak Barua
- Department of Computational and Systems Biology, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Robert P Sheehan
- Department of Computational and Systems Biology, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - James R Faeder
- Department of Computational and Systems Biology, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| |
Collapse
|