1
|
Sar S, Mitra S, Panda P, Mandal SC, Ghosh N, Halder AK, Cordeiro MNDS. In Silico Modeling and Structural Analysis of Soluble Epoxide Hydrolase Inhibitors for Enhanced Therapeutic Design. Molecules 2023; 28:6379. [PMID: 37687207 PMCID: PMC10490281 DOI: 10.3390/molecules28176379] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/13/2023] [Revised: 08/17/2023] [Accepted: 08/28/2023] [Indexed: 09/10/2023] Open
Abstract
Human soluble epoxide hydrolase (sEH), a dual-functioning homodimeric enzyme with hydrolase and phosphatase activities, is known for its pivotal role in the hydrolysis of epoxyeicosatrienoic acids. Inhibitors targeting sEH have shown promising potential in the treatment of various life-threatening diseases. In this study, we employed a range of in silico modeling approaches to investigate a diverse dataset of structurally distinct sEH inhibitors. Our primary aim was to develop predictive and validated models while gaining insights into the structural requirements necessary for achieving higher inhibitory potential. To accomplish this, we initially calculated molecular descriptors using nine different descriptor-calculating tools, coupled with stochastic and non-stochastic feature selection strategies, to identify the most statistically significant linear 2D-QSAR model. The resulting model highlighted the critical roles played by topological characteristics, 2D pharmacophore features, and specific physicochemical properties in enhancing inhibitory potential. In addition to conventional 2D-QSAR modeling, we implemented the Transformer-CNN methodology to develop QSAR models, enabling us to obtain structural interpretations based on the Layer-wise Relevance Propagation (LRP) algorithm. Moreover, a comprehensive 3D-QSAR analysis provided additional insights into the structural requirements of these compounds as potent sEH inhibitors. To validate the findings from the QSAR modeling studies, we performed molecular dynamics (MD) simulations using selected compounds from the dataset. The simulation results offered crucial insights into receptor-ligand interactions, supporting the predictions obtained from the QSAR models. Collectively, our work serves as an essential guideline for the rational design of novel sEH inhibitors with enhanced therapeutic potential. Importantly, all the in silico studies were performed using open-access tools to ensure reproducibility and accessibility.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shuvam Sar
- Department of Pharmaceutical Technology, Jadavpur University, Kolkata 700032, India; (S.S.)
| | - Soumya Mitra
- Department of Pharmaceutical Technology, Jadavpur University, Kolkata 700032, India; (S.S.)
- Dr. B. C. Roy College of Pharmacy and Allied Health Sciences, Campus Dr. Meghnad Saha Sarani, Durgapur 713206, India
| | - Parthasarathi Panda
- Dr. B. C. Roy College of Pharmacy and Allied Health Sciences, Campus Dr. Meghnad Saha Sarani, Durgapur 713206, India
| | - Subhash C. Mandal
- Department of Pharmaceutical Technology, Jadavpur University, Kolkata 700032, India; (S.S.)
| | - Nilanjan Ghosh
- Department of Pharmaceutical Technology, Jadavpur University, Kolkata 700032, India; (S.S.)
| | - Amit Kumar Halder
- Dr. B. C. Roy College of Pharmacy and Allied Health Sciences, Campus Dr. Meghnad Saha Sarani, Durgapur 713206, India
- LAQV@REQUIMTE—Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry, Faculty of Sciences, University of Porto, 4169-007 Porto, Portugal
| | - Maria Natalia D. S. Cordeiro
- LAQV@REQUIMTE—Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry, Faculty of Sciences, University of Porto, 4169-007 Porto, Portugal
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Boublia A, Lemaoui T, Abu Hatab F, Darwish AS, Banat F, Benguerba Y, AlNashef IM. Molecular-Based Artificial Neural Network for Predicting the Electrical Conductivity of Deep Eutectic Solvents. J Mol Liq 2022. [DOI: 10.1016/j.molliq.2022.120225] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/31/2022]
|
3
|
Integrated Network Pharmacology Approach for Drug Combination Discovery: A Multi-Cancer Case Study. Cancers (Basel) 2022; 14:cancers14082043. [PMID: 35454948 PMCID: PMC9028433 DOI: 10.3390/cancers14082043] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/24/2022] [Revised: 04/04/2022] [Accepted: 04/13/2022] [Indexed: 12/20/2022] Open
Abstract
Despite remarkable efforts of computational and predictive pharmacology to improve therapeutic strategies for complex diseases, only in a few cases have the predictions been eventually employed in the clinics. One of the reasons behind this drawback is that current predictive approaches are based only on the integration of molecular perturbation of a certain disease with drug sensitivity signatures, neglecting intrinsic properties of the drugs. Here we integrate mechanistic and chemocentric approaches to drug repositioning by developing an innovative network pharmacology strategy. We developed a multilayer network-based computational framework integrating perturbational signatures of the disease as well as intrinsic characteristics of the drugs, such as their mechanism of action and chemical structure. We present five case studies carried out on public data from The Cancer Genome Atlas, including invasive breast cancer, colon adenocarcinoma, lung squamous cell carcinoma, hepatocellular carcinoma and prostate adenocarcinoma. Our results highlight paclitaxel as a suitable drug for combination therapy for many of the considered cancer types. In addition, several non-cancer-related genes representing unusual drug targets were identified as potential candidates for pharmacological treatment of cancer.
Collapse
|
4
|
Serra A, Saarimäki LA, Pavel A, del Giudice G, Fratello M, Cattelani L, Federico A, Laurino O, Marwah VS, Fortino V, Scala G, Sofia Kinaret PA, Greco D. Nextcast: A software suite to analyse and model toxicogenomics data. Comput Struct Biotechnol J 2022; 20:1413-1426. [PMID: 35386103 PMCID: PMC8956870 DOI: 10.1016/j.csbj.2022.03.014] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/25/2021] [Revised: 03/16/2022] [Accepted: 03/16/2022] [Indexed: 11/28/2022] Open
Abstract
The recent advancements in toxicogenomics have led to the availability of large omics data sets, representing the starting point for studying the exposure mechanism of action and identifying candidate biomarkers for toxicity prediction. The current lack of standard methods in data generation and analysis hampers the full exploitation of toxicogenomics-based evidence in regulatory risk assessment. Moreover, the pipelines for the preprocessing and downstream analyses of toxicogenomic data sets can be quite challenging to implement. During the years, we have developed a number of software packages to address specific questions related to multiple steps of toxicogenomics data analysis and modelling. In this review we present the Nextcast software collection and discuss how its individual tools can be combined into efficient pipelines to answer specific biological questions. Nextcast components are of great support to the scientific community for analysing and interpreting large data sets for the toxicity evaluation of compounds in an unbiased, straightforward, and reliable manner. The Nextcast software suite is available at: ( https://github.com/fhaive/nextcast).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Angela Serra
- Faculty of Medicine and Health Technology, Tampere University, Tampere, Finland
- BioMediTech Institute, Tampere University, Tampere University, Tampere, Finland
- Finnish Hub for Development and Validation of Integrated Approaches (FHAIVE), Tampere, Finland
| | - Laura Aliisa Saarimäki
- Faculty of Medicine and Health Technology, Tampere University, Tampere, Finland
- BioMediTech Institute, Tampere University, Tampere University, Tampere, Finland
- Finnish Hub for Development and Validation of Integrated Approaches (FHAIVE), Tampere, Finland
| | - Alisa Pavel
- Faculty of Medicine and Health Technology, Tampere University, Tampere, Finland
- BioMediTech Institute, Tampere University, Tampere University, Tampere, Finland
- Finnish Hub for Development and Validation of Integrated Approaches (FHAIVE), Tampere, Finland
| | - Giusy del Giudice
- Faculty of Medicine and Health Technology, Tampere University, Tampere, Finland
- BioMediTech Institute, Tampere University, Tampere University, Tampere, Finland
- Finnish Hub for Development and Validation of Integrated Approaches (FHAIVE), Tampere, Finland
| | - Michele Fratello
- Faculty of Medicine and Health Technology, Tampere University, Tampere, Finland
- BioMediTech Institute, Tampere University, Tampere University, Tampere, Finland
- Finnish Hub for Development and Validation of Integrated Approaches (FHAIVE), Tampere, Finland
| | - Luca Cattelani
- Faculty of Medicine and Health Technology, Tampere University, Tampere, Finland
- BioMediTech Institute, Tampere University, Tampere University, Tampere, Finland
- Finnish Hub for Development and Validation of Integrated Approaches (FHAIVE), Tampere, Finland
| | - Antonio Federico
- Faculty of Medicine and Health Technology, Tampere University, Tampere, Finland
- BioMediTech Institute, Tampere University, Tampere University, Tampere, Finland
- Finnish Hub for Development and Validation of Integrated Approaches (FHAIVE), Tampere, Finland
| | | | - Veer Singh Marwah
- Faculty of Medicine and Health Technology, Tampere University, Tampere, Finland
- BioMediTech Institute, Tampere University, Tampere University, Tampere, Finland
| | - Vittorio Fortino
- Institute of Biomedicine, University of Eastern Finland, Kuopio, Finland
| | - Giovanni Scala
- Faculty of Medicine and Health Technology, Tampere University, Tampere, Finland
- BioMediTech Institute, Tampere University, Tampere University, Tampere, Finland
- Department of Biology, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy
| | - Pia Anneli Sofia Kinaret
- Faculty of Medicine and Health Technology, Tampere University, Tampere, Finland
- BioMediTech Institute, Tampere University, Tampere University, Tampere, Finland
- Finnish Hub for Development and Validation of Integrated Approaches (FHAIVE), Tampere, Finland
- Institute of Biotechnology, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland
| | - Dario Greco
- Faculty of Medicine and Health Technology, Tampere University, Tampere, Finland
- BioMediTech Institute, Tampere University, Tampere University, Tampere, Finland
- Finnish Hub for Development and Validation of Integrated Approaches (FHAIVE), Tampere, Finland
- Institute of Biotechnology, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Halder AK, Delgado AHS, Cordeiro MNDS. First multi-target QSAR model for predicting the cytotoxicity of acrylic acid-based dental monomers. Dent Mater 2021; 38:333-346. [PMID: 34955234 DOI: 10.1016/j.dental.2021.12.014] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/30/2021] [Revised: 11/17/2021] [Accepted: 12/08/2021] [Indexed: 12/27/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Acrylic acid derivatives are frequently used as dental monomers and their cytotoxicity towards various cell lines is well documented. This study aims to probe the structural and physicochemical attributes responsible for higher toxicity of dental monomers, using quantitative structure-activity relationships (QSAR) modeling approaches. METHODS A regression-based linear single-target QSAR (st-QSAR) model was developed with a comparatively small dataset containing 39 compounds, the cytotoxicity of which has been assessed over the Hela S3 cell line. By contrast, a classification-based multi-target QSAR model was developed with 138 compounds, the cytotoxicity of which has been reported against 18 different cell lines. Both models were set up following rigorous validation protocols confirming their statistical significance and robustness. RESULTS The performance of the linear mt-QSAR model, developed with various feature selection and post-selection similarity searching-based schemes, superseded that of all non-linear models produced with six machine learning methods by hyperparameter optimization. The final derived st-QSAR and mt-QSAR linear models are shown to be highly predictive, as well as revealing the crucial structural and physicochemical factors responsible for higher cytotoxicity of the dental monomers. SIGNIFICANCE This study is the first attempt on unveiling the cytotoxicity of dental monomers over several cell lines by means of a single multi-target QSAR model. Further, such a model is ready to get widespread applicability in the screening of new monomers, judging from its almost accurate predictions over diverse experimental assay conditions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Amit Kumar Halder
- LAQV@REQUIMTE/Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry, Faculty of Sciences, University of Porto, Porto, Portugal; Dr. B. C. Roy College of Pharmacy and Allied Health Sciences, Dr. Meghnad Saha Sarani, Bidhannagar, Durgapur 713212, West Bengal, India
| | - António H S Delgado
- Division of Biomaterials and Tissue Engineering, UCL Eastman Dental Institute, London, UK; Centro de Investigação Interdisciplinar Egas Moniz (CiiEM), Monte de Caparica, Portugal.
| | - M Natália D S Cordeiro
- LAQV@REQUIMTE/Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry, Faculty of Sciences, University of Porto, Porto, Portugal.
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Density of Deep Eutectic Solvents: The Path Forward Cheminformatics-Driven Reliable Predictions for Mixtures. Molecules 2021; 26:molecules26195779. [PMID: 34641322 PMCID: PMC8510218 DOI: 10.3390/molecules26195779] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/26/2021] [Revised: 09/19/2021] [Accepted: 09/21/2021] [Indexed: 12/26/2022] Open
Abstract
Deep eutectic solvents (DES) are often regarded as greener sustainable alternative solvents and are currently employed in many industrial applications on a large scale. Bearing in mind the industrial importance of DES—and because the vast majority of DES has yet to be synthesized—the development of cheminformatic models and tools efficiently profiling their density becomes essential. In this work, after rigorous validation, quantitative structure-property relationship (QSPR) models were proposed for use in estimating the density of a wide variety of DES. These models were based on a modelling dataset previously employed for constructing thermodynamic models for the same endpoint. The best QSPR models were robust and sound, performing well on an external validation set (set up with recently reported experimental density data of DES). Furthermore, the results revealed structural features that could play crucial roles in ruling DES density. Then, intelligent consensus prediction was employed to develop a consensus model with improved predictive accuracy. All models were derived using publicly available tools to facilitate easy reproducibility of the proposed methodology. Future work may involve setting up reliable, interpretable cheminformatic models for other thermodynamic properties of DES and guiding the design of these solvents for applications.
Collapse
|
7
|
Saarimäki LA, Federico A, Lynch I, Papadiamantis AG, Tsoumanis A, Melagraki G, Afantitis A, Serra A, Greco D. Manually curated transcriptomics data collection for toxicogenomic assessment of engineered nanomaterials. Sci Data 2021; 8:49. [PMID: 33558569 PMCID: PMC7870661 DOI: 10.1038/s41597-021-00808-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/23/2020] [Accepted: 12/16/2020] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
Toxicogenomics (TGx) approaches are increasingly applied to gain insight into the possible toxicity mechanisms of engineered nanomaterials (ENMs). Omics data can be valuable to elucidate the mechanism of action of chemicals and to develop predictive models in toxicology. While vast amounts of transcriptomics data from ENM exposures have already been accumulated, a unified, easily accessible and reusable collection of transcriptomics data for ENMs is currently lacking. In an attempt to improve the FAIRness of already existing transcriptomics data for ENMs, we curated a collection of homogenized transcriptomics data from human, mouse and rat ENM exposures in vitro and in vivo including the physicochemical characteristics of the ENMs used in each study.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Laura Aliisa Saarimäki
- Faculty of Medicine and Health Technology, Tampere University, Tampere, Finland
- BioMediTech Institute, Tampere University, Tampere, Finland
| | - Antonio Federico
- Faculty of Medicine and Health Technology, Tampere University, Tampere, Finland
- BioMediTech Institute, Tampere University, Tampere, Finland
| | - Iseult Lynch
- School of Geography, Earth and Environmental Sciences, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, B15 2TT, Birmingham, United Kingdom
| | - Anastasios G Papadiamantis
- School of Geography, Earth and Environmental Sciences, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, B15 2TT, Birmingham, United Kingdom
- NovaMechanics Ltd, P.O Box 26014 1666, Nicosia, Cyprus
| | | | | | | | - Angela Serra
- Faculty of Medicine and Health Technology, Tampere University, Tampere, Finland
- BioMediTech Institute, Tampere University, Tampere, Finland
| | - Dario Greco
- Faculty of Medicine and Health Technology, Tampere University, Tampere, Finland.
- BioMediTech Institute, Tampere University, Tampere, Finland.
- Institute of Biotechnology, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland.
- Finnish Centre for Alternative Methods (FICAM), Faculty of Medicine and Heath Technology, Tampere University, Tampere, Finland.
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Lambrinidis G, Tsantili-Kakoulidou A. Multi-objective optimization methods in novel drug design. Expert Opin Drug Discov 2020; 16:647-658. [PMID: 33353441 DOI: 10.1080/17460441.2021.1867095] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/23/2022]
Abstract
Introduction: In multi-objective drug design, optimization gains importance, being upgraded to a discipline that attracts its own research. Current strategies are broadly classified into single - objective optimization (SOO) and multi-objective optimization (MOO).Areas covered: Starting with SOO and the ways used to incorporate multiple criteria into it, the present review focuses on MOO techniques, their comparison, advantages, and restrictions. Pareto analysis and the concept of dominance stand in the core of MOO. The Pareto front, Pareto ranking, and limitations of Pareto-based methods, due to high dimensions and data uncertainty, are outlined. Desirability functions and the weighted sum approaches are described as stand-alone techniques to transform the MOO problem to SOO or in combination with pareto analysis and evolutionary algorithms. Representative applications in different drug research areas are also discussed.Expert opinion: Despite their limitations, the use of combined MOO techniques, as well as being complementary to SOO or in conjunction with artificial intelligence, contributes dramatically to efficient drug design, assisting decisions and increasing success probabilities. For multi-target drug design, optimization is supported by network approaches, while applicability of MOO to other fields like drug technology or biological complexity opens new perspectives in the interrelated fields of medicinal chemistry and molecular biology.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- George Lambrinidis
- Division of Pharmaceutical Chemistry, Department of Pharmacy, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Panepistimiopolis, Zografou, Athens, Greece
| | - Anna Tsantili-Kakoulidou
- Division of Pharmaceutical Chemistry, Department of Pharmacy, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Panepistimiopolis, Zografou, Athens, Greece
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Abstract
Artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning, in particular, have gained significant interest in many fields, including pharmaceutical sciences. The enormous growth of data from several sources, the recent advances in various analytical tools, and the continuous developments in machine learning algorithms have resulted in a rapid increase in new machine learning applications in different areas of pharmaceutical sciences. This review summarizes the past, present, and potential future impacts of machine learning technologies on different areas of pharmaceutical sciences, including drug design and discovery, preformulation, and formulation. The machine learning methods commonly used in pharmaceutical sciences are discussed, with a specific emphasis on artificial neural networks due to their capability to model the nonlinear relationships that are commonly encountered in pharmaceutical research. AI and machine learning technologies in common day-to-day pharma needs as well as industrial and regulatory insights are reviewed. Beyond traditional potentials of implementing digital technologies using machine learning in the development of more efficient, fast, and economical solutions in pharmaceutical sciences are also discussed.
Collapse
|
10
|
Serra A, Fratello M, Cattelani L, Liampa I, Melagraki G, Kohonen P, Nymark P, Federico A, Kinaret PAS, Jagiello K, Ha MK, Choi JS, Sanabria N, Gulumian M, Puzyn T, Yoon TH, Sarimveis H, Grafström R, Afantitis A, Greco D. Transcriptomics in Toxicogenomics, Part III: Data Modelling for Risk Assessment. NANOMATERIALS (BASEL, SWITZERLAND) 2020; 10:E708. [PMID: 32276469 PMCID: PMC7221955 DOI: 10.3390/nano10040708] [Citation(s) in RCA: 30] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/10/2020] [Revised: 03/25/2020] [Accepted: 03/26/2020] [Indexed: 12/30/2022]
Abstract
Transcriptomics data are relevant to address a number of challenges in Toxicogenomics (TGx). After careful planning of exposure conditions and data preprocessing, the TGx data can be used in predictive toxicology, where more advanced modelling techniques are applied. The large volume of molecular profiles produced by omics-based technologies allows the development and application of artificial intelligence (AI) methods in TGx. Indeed, the publicly available omics datasets are constantly increasing together with a plethora of different methods that are made available to facilitate their analysis, interpretation and the generation of accurate and stable predictive models. In this review, we present the state-of-the-art of data modelling applied to transcriptomics data in TGx. We show how the benchmark dose (BMD) analysis can be applied to TGx data. We review read across and adverse outcome pathways (AOP) modelling methodologies. We discuss how network-based approaches can be successfully employed to clarify the mechanism of action (MOA) or specific biomarkers of exposure. We also describe the main AI methodologies applied to TGx data to create predictive classification and regression models and we address current challenges. Finally, we present a short description of deep learning (DL) and data integration methodologies applied in these contexts. Modelling of TGx data represents a valuable tool for more accurate chemical safety assessment. This review is the third part of a three-article series on Transcriptomics in Toxicogenomics.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Angela Serra
- Faculty of Medicine and Health Technology, Tampere University, FI-33014 Tampere, Finland; (A.S.); (M.F.); (L.C.); (A.F.); (P.A.S.K.)
- BioMediTech Institute, Tampere University, FI-33014 Tampere, Finland
| | - Michele Fratello
- Faculty of Medicine and Health Technology, Tampere University, FI-33014 Tampere, Finland; (A.S.); (M.F.); (L.C.); (A.F.); (P.A.S.K.)
- BioMediTech Institute, Tampere University, FI-33014 Tampere, Finland
| | - Luca Cattelani
- Faculty of Medicine and Health Technology, Tampere University, FI-33014 Tampere, Finland; (A.S.); (M.F.); (L.C.); (A.F.); (P.A.S.K.)
- BioMediTech Institute, Tampere University, FI-33014 Tampere, Finland
| | - Irene Liampa
- School of Chemical Engineering, National Technical University of Athens, 157 80 Athens, Greece; (I.L.); (H.S.)
| | - Georgia Melagraki
- Nanoinformatics Department, NovaMechanics Ltd., Nicosia 1065, Cyprus; (G.M.); (A.A.)
| | - Pekka Kohonen
- Institute of Environmental Medicine, Karolinska Institutet, 171 77 Stockholm, Sweden; (P.K.); (P.N.); (R.G.)
- Division of Toxicology, Misvik Biology, 20520 Turku, Finland
| | - Penny Nymark
- Institute of Environmental Medicine, Karolinska Institutet, 171 77 Stockholm, Sweden; (P.K.); (P.N.); (R.G.)
- Division of Toxicology, Misvik Biology, 20520 Turku, Finland
| | - Antonio Federico
- Faculty of Medicine and Health Technology, Tampere University, FI-33014 Tampere, Finland; (A.S.); (M.F.); (L.C.); (A.F.); (P.A.S.K.)
- BioMediTech Institute, Tampere University, FI-33014 Tampere, Finland
| | - Pia Anneli Sofia Kinaret
- Faculty of Medicine and Health Technology, Tampere University, FI-33014 Tampere, Finland; (A.S.); (M.F.); (L.C.); (A.F.); (P.A.S.K.)
- BioMediTech Institute, Tampere University, FI-33014 Tampere, Finland
- Institute of Biotechnology, University of Helsinki, 00014 Helsinki, Finland
| | - Karolina Jagiello
- QSAR Lab Ltd., Aleja Grunwaldzka 190/102, 80-266 Gdansk, Poland; (K.J.); (T.P.)
- University of Gdansk, Faculty of Chemistry, Wita Stwosza 63, 80-308 Gdansk, Poland
| | - My Kieu Ha
- Center for Next Generation Cytometry, Hanyang University, Seoul 04763, Korea; (M.K.H.); (J.-S.C.); (T.-H.Y.)
- Department of Chemistry, College of Natural Sciences, Hanyang University, Seoul 04763, Korea
- Institute of Next Generation Material Design, Hanyang University, Seoul 04763, Korea
| | - Jang-Sik Choi
- Center for Next Generation Cytometry, Hanyang University, Seoul 04763, Korea; (M.K.H.); (J.-S.C.); (T.-H.Y.)
- Department of Chemistry, College of Natural Sciences, Hanyang University, Seoul 04763, Korea
- Institute of Next Generation Material Design, Hanyang University, Seoul 04763, Korea
| | - Natasha Sanabria
- National Institute for Occupational Health, Johannesburg 30333, South Africa; (N.S.); (M.G.)
| | - Mary Gulumian
- National Institute for Occupational Health, Johannesburg 30333, South Africa; (N.S.); (M.G.)
- Haematology and Molecular Medicine Department, School of Pathology, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg 2050, South Africa
| | - Tomasz Puzyn
- QSAR Lab Ltd., Aleja Grunwaldzka 190/102, 80-266 Gdansk, Poland; (K.J.); (T.P.)
- University of Gdansk, Faculty of Chemistry, Wita Stwosza 63, 80-308 Gdansk, Poland
| | - Tae-Hyun Yoon
- Center for Next Generation Cytometry, Hanyang University, Seoul 04763, Korea; (M.K.H.); (J.-S.C.); (T.-H.Y.)
- Department of Chemistry, College of Natural Sciences, Hanyang University, Seoul 04763, Korea
- Institute of Next Generation Material Design, Hanyang University, Seoul 04763, Korea
| | - Haralambos Sarimveis
- School of Chemical Engineering, National Technical University of Athens, 157 80 Athens, Greece; (I.L.); (H.S.)
| | - Roland Grafström
- Institute of Environmental Medicine, Karolinska Institutet, 171 77 Stockholm, Sweden; (P.K.); (P.N.); (R.G.)
- Division of Toxicology, Misvik Biology, 20520 Turku, Finland
| | - Antreas Afantitis
- Nanoinformatics Department, NovaMechanics Ltd., Nicosia 1065, Cyprus; (G.M.); (A.A.)
| | - Dario Greco
- Faculty of Medicine and Health Technology, Tampere University, FI-33014 Tampere, Finland; (A.S.); (M.F.); (L.C.); (A.F.); (P.A.S.K.)
- BioMediTech Institute, Tampere University, FI-33014 Tampere, Finland
- Institute of Biotechnology, University of Helsinki, 00014 Helsinki, Finland
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Afantitis A, Melagraki G, Isigonis P, Tsoumanis A, Varsou DD, Valsami-Jones E, Papadiamantis A, Ellis LJA, Sarimveis H, Doganis P, Karatzas P, Tsiros P, Liampa I, Lobaskin V, Greco D, Serra A, Kinaret PAS, Saarimäki LA, Grafström R, Kohonen P, Nymark P, Willighagen E, Puzyn T, Rybinska-Fryca A, Lyubartsev A, Alstrup Jensen K, Brandenburg JG, Lofts S, Svendsen C, Harrison S, Maier D, Tamm K, Jänes J, Sikk L, Dusinska M, Longhin E, Rundén-Pran E, Mariussen E, El Yamani N, Unger W, Radnik J, Tropsha A, Cohen Y, Leszczynski J, Ogilvie Hendren C, Wiesner M, Winkler D, Suzuki N, Yoon TH, Choi JS, Sanabria N, Gulumian M, Lynch I. NanoSolveIT Project: Driving nanoinformatics research to develop innovative and integrated tools for in silico nanosafety assessment. Comput Struct Biotechnol J 2020; 18:583-602. [PMID: 32226594 PMCID: PMC7090366 DOI: 10.1016/j.csbj.2020.02.023] [Citation(s) in RCA: 52] [Impact Index Per Article: 13.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/12/2019] [Revised: 02/18/2020] [Accepted: 02/29/2020] [Indexed: 01/26/2023] Open
Abstract
Nanotechnology has enabled the discovery of a multitude of novel materials exhibiting unique physicochemical (PChem) properties compared to their bulk analogues. These properties have led to a rapidly increasing range of commercial applications; this, however, may come at a cost, if an association to long-term health and environmental risks is discovered or even just perceived. Many nanomaterials (NMs) have not yet had their potential adverse biological effects fully assessed, due to costs and time constraints associated with the experimental assessment, frequently involving animals. Here, the available NM libraries are analyzed for their suitability for integration with novel nanoinformatics approaches and for the development of NM specific Integrated Approaches to Testing and Assessment (IATA) for human and environmental risk assessment, all within the NanoSolveIT cloud-platform. These established and well-characterized NM libraries (e.g. NanoMILE, NanoSolutions, NANoREG, NanoFASE, caLIBRAte, NanoTEST and the Nanomaterial Registry (>2000 NMs)) contain physicochemical characterization data as well as data for several relevant biological endpoints, assessed in part using harmonized Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) methods and test guidelines. Integration of such extensive NM information sources with the latest nanoinformatics methods will allow NanoSolveIT to model the relationships between NM structure (morphology), properties and their adverse effects and to predict the effects of other NMs for which less data is available. The project specifically addresses the needs of regulatory agencies and industry to effectively and rapidly evaluate the exposure, NM hazard and risk from nanomaterials and nano-enabled products, enabling implementation of computational 'safe-by-design' approaches to facilitate NM commercialization.
Collapse
Key Words
- (quantitative) Structure–activity relationships
- AI, Artificial Intelligence
- AOPs, Adverse Outcome Pathways
- API, Application Programming interface
- CG, coarse-grained (model)
- CNTs, carbon nanotubes
- Computational toxicology
- Engineered nanomaterials
- FAIR, Findable Accessible Inter-operable and Re-usable
- GUI, Graphical Processing Unit
- HOMO-LUMO, Highest Occupied Molecular Orbital Lowest Unoccupied Molecular Orbital
- Hazard assessment
- IATA, Integrated Approaches to Testing and Assessment
- Integrated approach for testing and assessment
- KE, key events
- MIE, molecular initiating events
- ML, machine learning
- MOA, mechanism (mode) of action
- MWCNT, multi-walled carbon nanotubes
- Machine learning
- NMs, nanomaterials
- Nanoinformatics
- OECD, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development
- PBPK, Physiologically Based PharmacoKinetics
- PC, Protein Corona
- PChem, Physicochemical
- PTGS, Predictive Toxicogenomics Space
- Predictive modelling
- QC, quantum-chemical
- QM, quantum-mechanical
- QSAR, quantitative structure-activity relationship
- QSPR, quantitative structure-property relationship
- RA, risk assessment
- REST, Representational State Transfer
- ROS, reactive oxygen species
- Read across
- SAR, structure-activity relationship
- SMILES, Simplified Molecular Input Line Entry System
- SOPs, standard operating procedures
- Safe-by-design
- Toxicogenomics
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | | | - Eugenia Valsami-Jones
- School of Geography, Earth and Environmental Sciences, University of Birmingham, B15 2TT Birmingham, UK
| | - Anastasios Papadiamantis
- School of Geography, Earth and Environmental Sciences, University of Birmingham, B15 2TT Birmingham, UK
| | - Laura-Jayne A. Ellis
- School of Geography, Earth and Environmental Sciences, University of Birmingham, B15 2TT Birmingham, UK
| | - Haralambos Sarimveis
- School of Chemical Engineering, National Technical University of Athens, 157 80 Athens, Greece
| | - Philip Doganis
- School of Chemical Engineering, National Technical University of Athens, 157 80 Athens, Greece
| | - Pantelis Karatzas
- School of Chemical Engineering, National Technical University of Athens, 157 80 Athens, Greece
| | - Periklis Tsiros
- School of Chemical Engineering, National Technical University of Athens, 157 80 Athens, Greece
| | - Irene Liampa
- School of Chemical Engineering, National Technical University of Athens, 157 80 Athens, Greece
| | - Vladimir Lobaskin
- School of Physics, University College Dublin, Belfield, Dublin 4, Ireland
| | - Dario Greco
- Faculty of Medicine and Health Technology, University of Tampere, FI-33014, Finland
| | - Angela Serra
- Faculty of Medicine and Health Technology, University of Tampere, FI-33014, Finland
| | | | | | - Roland Grafström
- Misvik Biology OY, Itäinen Pitkäkatu 4, 20520 Turku, Finland
- Karolinska Institute, Institute of Environmental Medicine, Nobels väg 13, 17177 Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Pekka Kohonen
- Misvik Biology OY, Itäinen Pitkäkatu 4, 20520 Turku, Finland
- Karolinska Institute, Institute of Environmental Medicine, Nobels väg 13, 17177 Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Penny Nymark
- Misvik Biology OY, Itäinen Pitkäkatu 4, 20520 Turku, Finland
- Karolinska Institute, Institute of Environmental Medicine, Nobels väg 13, 17177 Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Egon Willighagen
- Department of Bioinformatics – BiGCaT, School of Nutrition and Translational Research in Metabolism, Maastricht University, Universiteitssingel 50, 6229 ER Maastricht, the Netherlands
| | - Tomasz Puzyn
- QSAR Lab Ltd., Aleja Grunwaldzka 190/102, 80-266 Gdansk, Poland
- University of Gdansk, Faculty of Chemistry, Wita Stwosza 63, 80-308 Gdansk, Poland
| | | | - Alexander Lyubartsev
- Institutionen för material- och miljökemi, Stockholms Universitet, 106 91 Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Keld Alstrup Jensen
- The National Research Center for the Work Environment, Lersø Parkallé 105, 2100 Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Jan Gerit Brandenburg
- Interdisciplinary Center for Scientific Computing, Heidelberg University, Germany
- Chief Digital Organization, Merck KGaA, Frankfurter Str. 250, 64293 Darmstadt, Germany
| | - Stephen Lofts
- UK Centre for Ecology and Hydrology, Library Ave, Bailrigg, Lancaster LA1 4AP, UK
| | - Claus Svendsen
- UK Centre for Ecology and Hydrology, MacLean Bldg, Benson Ln, Crowmarsh Gifford, Wallingford OX10 8BB, UK
| | - Samuel Harrison
- UK Centre for Ecology and Hydrology, Library Ave, Bailrigg, Lancaster LA1 4AP, UK
| | - Dieter Maier
- Biomax Informatics AG, Robert-Koch-Str. 2, 82152 Planegg, Germany
| | - Kaido Tamm
- Department of Chemistry, University of Tartu, Ülikooli 18, 50090 Tartu, Estonia
| | - Jaak Jänes
- Department of Chemistry, University of Tartu, Ülikooli 18, 50090 Tartu, Estonia
| | - Lauri Sikk
- Department of Chemistry, University of Tartu, Ülikooli 18, 50090 Tartu, Estonia
| | - Maria Dusinska
- NILU-Norwegian Institute for Air Research, Instituttveien 18, 2002 Kjeller, Norway
| | - Eleonora Longhin
- NILU-Norwegian Institute for Air Research, Instituttveien 18, 2002 Kjeller, Norway
| | - Elise Rundén-Pran
- NILU-Norwegian Institute for Air Research, Instituttveien 18, 2002 Kjeller, Norway
| | - Espen Mariussen
- NILU-Norwegian Institute for Air Research, Instituttveien 18, 2002 Kjeller, Norway
| | - Naouale El Yamani
- NILU-Norwegian Institute for Air Research, Instituttveien 18, 2002 Kjeller, Norway
| | - Wolfgang Unger
- Federal Institute for Material Testing and Research (BAM), Unter den Eichen 44-46, 12203 Berlin, Germany
| | - Jörg Radnik
- Federal Institute for Material Testing and Research (BAM), Unter den Eichen 44-46, 12203 Berlin, Germany
| | - Alexander Tropsha
- Eschelman School of Pharmacy, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, 100K Beard Hall, CB# 7568, Chapel Hill, NC 27955-7568, USA
| | - Yoram Cohen
- Samueli School Of Engineering, University of California, Los Angeles, 5531 Boelter Hall, Los Angeles, CA 90095, USA
| | - Jerzy Leszczynski
- Interdisciplinary Nanotoxicity Center, Jackson State University, 1400 J. R. Lynch Street, Jackson, MS 39217, USA
| | - Christine Ogilvie Hendren
- Center for Environmental Implications of Nanotechnologies, Duke University, 121 Hudson Hall, Durham, NC 27708-0287, USA
| | - Mark Wiesner
- Center for Environmental Implications of Nanotechnologies, Duke University, 121 Hudson Hall, Durham, NC 27708-0287, USA
| | - David Winkler
- La Trobe Institute of Molecular Sciences, La Trobe University, Plenty Rd & Kingsbury Dr, Bundoora, VIC 3086, Australia
- Monash Institute of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Monash University, Parkville 3052, Australia
- CSIRO Data61, Clayton 3168, Australia
- School of Pharmacy, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
| | - Noriyuki Suzuki
- National Institute for Environmental Studies, 16-2 Onogawa, Tsukuba, Ibaraki 305-0053, Japan
| | - Tae Hyun Yoon
- Department of Chemistry, College of Natural Sciences, Hanyang University, Seoul 04763, Republic of Korea
- Institute of Next Generation Material Design, Hanyang University, Seoul 04763, Republic of Korea
| | - Jang-Sik Choi
- Institute of Next Generation Material Design, Hanyang University, Seoul 04763, Republic of Korea
| | - Natasha Sanabria
- National Health Laboratory Services, 1 Modderfontein Rd, Sandringham, Johannesburg 2192, South Africa
| | - Mary Gulumian
- National Health Laboratory Services, 1 Modderfontein Rd, Sandringham, Johannesburg 2192, South Africa
- Haematology and Molecular Medicine, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa
| | - Iseult Lynch
- School of Geography, Earth and Environmental Sciences, University of Birmingham, B15 2TT Birmingham, UK
| |
Collapse
|