Kisspeptin has an independent and direct effect on the pituitary gland in the mare

To more clearly understand the equine gonadotrope response to kisspeptin and gonadotropin releasing hormone (GnRH), peripheral LH and FSH were quantified in diestrous mares after treatment with either equine kisspeptide (eKp-10, 0.5 mg iv), GnRH (25 μg iv), or a combination thereof every 4 h for 3 days. The following observations were made: 1) a diminished LH and FSH response to eKp-10 and GnRH was observed by Day 3, but was not different by treatment, 2) a decrease in basal LH concentration was observed from Day 1 to Day 3 for the eKp-10, but not the GnRH treated mares, 3) there was no change in basal FSH with either treatment. Additionally, pre-treatment with GnRH antagonist (antide 1.0 mg iv) eliminated any measurable change in LH after eKp-10 (1.0 mg iv) treatment. Both GnRH and kisspeptin are Gα_q/11 coupled receptors, therefore quantifying the rise in intracellular calcium following treatment with cognate ligand allows simultaneous assessment of receptor activation. Direct stimulation of equine primary pituitary cells with GnRH and/or eKp-10 demonstrates three distinct populations of pituitary cells: one population responded to both eKp-10 and GnRH, a second, independent population, responded to only eKp-10, and a third population responded only to GnRH. These populations were confirmed using co-immunofluorescence of hemipituitaries from mares in diestrus. Although the rise in peripheral LH concentration elicited by eKp-10 is dependent on GnRH, this work suggests that kisspeptin also has a specific and direct effect on the equine gonadotrope, independent of GnRH.

History of Maternal Recognition of Pregnancy

The mechanism for signaling pregnancy recognition is highly variable among species, and the signaling molecule itself varies between estrogens in pigs to chorionic gonadotrophin in primates. This chapter provides insight into the menstrual cycle of women and estrous cycles of rodents, dog, cat, pigs, sheep, rabbits, and marsupials, as well as the hormones required for pregnancy recognition. Pregnancy recognition involves specific hormones such as prolactin in rodents or interferons in ruminants and estrogens in pigs that in their own way ensure the maintenance of the corpus luteum and its secretion of progesterone which is the hormone of pregnancy. However, these pregnancy recognition signals may also modify gene expression in a cell-specific and temporal manner to ensure the growth and development of the conceptus. This chapter provides some historical aspects of the development of understanding of mechanisms for the establishment and maintenance of pregnancy in several species of mammals.

Inter-relationships between the secretory dynamics of thyrotrophin-releasing hormone, thyrotrophin and prolactin in periovulatory mares: effect of hypothyroidism

We used our nonsurgical technique for collecting pituitary venous blood to relate the dynamics of thyrotrophin-releasing hormone (TRH) secretion to the secretion patterns of both prolactin and thyrotrophin in periovulatory mares, either euthyroid (n = 5) or made hypothyroid by treatment with propyl-thiouracil (n = 5). Pituitary venous blood was collected continuously and divided into 1-min aliquots for 4 h. To test the effect of dopamine on the relationship between secretion patterns, sulpiride, a selective D2 receptor antagonist, was given i.m. after 2 h of sampling. Thorough testing of the model and blood collection procedure revealed no sites of TRH loss. Hypothyroidism increased the mean secretion rates of TRH (P = 0.04) and thyrotrophin (P < 0.0001) but not prolactin. Sulpiride increased prolactin secretion rates in hypothyroid (P < 0.0001) and control (P = 0.007) mares, but did not alter TRH or thyrotrophin secretion rates. In both groups of mares, all three hormones were secreted episodically but not rhythmically. In both groups, the secretion pattern of TRH was almost always significantly related to that of thyrotrophin, as assessed by cross correlation and cross approximate entropy (ApEn) analysis. However, the degree of linear correlation was weak, with only 14% (hypothyroid) or 8% (controls) of the variation in thyrotrophin secretion rates attributable to TRH. Prolactin and TRH secretion patterns before sulpiride were coupled on cross ApEn analysis in both groups, and the minute-to-minute secretion rates of the two hormones were correlated in four hypothyroid and three euthyroid mares. Overall, the small, but significant, degree of association between TRH and prolactin was similar to that between TRH and thyrotrophin. In hypothyroid mares, sulpiride increased (P = 0.02) the synchrony between TRH and prolactin patterns. We conclude that in horses: (i) little TRH degradation occurs during passage through the pituitary or in blood after 1 h at 37 degrees C; (ii) TRH is not the major factor controlling minute-to-minute fluctuations in either thyrotrophin or prolactin; and (iii) reducing two strongly inhibitory inputs (i.e. dopamine and thyroid hormones) may magnify the stimulatory effect of TRH on prolactin secretion.

Effect of 2-deoxy-D-glucose on gonadotropins, prolactin and serum glucose concentrations in the mare

In a variety of species, glucoprivation results in the suppression of the reproductive axis. Two experiments were performed to test the hypothesis that blockade of glucose metabolism via administration of the glucose inhibitor 2-deoxy-D-glucose (2DG) to mares would cause a modification in gonadotropin and prolactin secretion. Long-term ovariectomized mares (Experiment 1, n=4) or ovary-intact mares during the follicular phase of a synchronized estrous cycle (Experiment 2, n=4 per dose) were treated with 2DG. The dose of 2DG used in Experiment 1 was 100mg 2DG/kg BW, but because severe behavioral responses occurred, lower doses (50, 25, and 12.5mg 2DG/kg BW) were used for Experiment 2. In addition to the effects of 2DG, the pituitary responsiveness after glucoprivation was determined by an injection of gonadotropin-releasing hormone (100 microg) 6h post-treatment. In both experiments, treatment with 2DG was unaccompanied by changes in gonadotropin secretion or pituitary responsiveness. Mares treated with 100 mg 2DG/kg BW exhibited a significant increase in prolactin and mares treated with 100mg 2DG or 50mg 2DG/kg BW exhibited a significant increase in serum glucose concentrations, suggesting that glucoprivation was detected at these doses. Lower doses of 2DG did not cause significant alterations in prolactin or glucose levels. These results indicate that 2DG inhibits glucose utilization, but short-term glucoprivation via this metabolic inhibitor does not alter gonadotropin secretion in the mare. This lack of response to glucoprivation may reflect species differences in the response to glucoprivation or may be due to metabolic responses to the inhibition of glucose availability.

Luteolysis: a neuroendocrine-mediated event

In many nonprimate mammalian species, cyclical regression of the corpus luteum (luteolysis) is caused by the episodic pulsatile secretion of uterine PGF2alpha, which acts either locally on the corpus luteum by a countercurrent mechanism or, in some species, via the systemic circulation. Hysterectomy in these nonprimate species causes maintenance of the corpora lutea, whereas in primates, removal of the uterus does not influence the cyclical regression of the corpus luteum. In several nonprimate species, the episodic pattern of uterine PGF2alpha secretion appears to be controlled indirectly by the ovarian steroid hormones estradiol-17beta and progesterone. It is proposed that, toward the end of the luteal phase, loss of progesterone action occurs both centrally in the hypothalamus and in the uterus due to the catalytic reduction (downregulation) of progesterone receptors by progesterone. Loss of progesterone action may permit the return of estrogen action, both centrally in the hypothalamus and peripherally in the uterus. Return of central estrogen action appears to cause the hypothalamic oxytocin pulse generator to alter its frequency and produce a series of intermittent episodes of oxytocin secretion. In the uterus, returning estrogen action concomitantly upregulates endometrial oxytocin receptors. The interaction of neurohypophysial oxytocin with oxytocin receptors in the endometrium evokes the secretion of luteolytic pulses of uterine PGF2alpha. Thus the uterus can be regarded as a transducer that converts intermittent neural signals from the hypothalamus, in the form of episodic oxytocin secretion, into luteolytic pulses of uterine PGF2alpha. In ruminants, portions of a finite store of luteal oxytocin are released synchronously by uterine PGF2alpha pulses. Luteal oxytocin in ruminants may thus serve to amplify neural oxytocin signals that are transduced by the uterus into pulses of PGF2alpha. Whether such amplification of episodic PGF2alpha pulses by luteal oxytocin is a necessary requirement for luteolysis in ruminants remains to be determined. Recently, oxytocin has been reported to be produced by the endometrium and myometrium of the sow, mare, and rat. It is possible that uterine production of oxytocin may act as a supplemental source of oxytocin during luteolysis in these species. In primates, oxytocin and its receptor and PGF2alpha and its receptor have been identified in the corpus luteum and/or ovary. Therefore, it is possible that oxytocin signals of ovarian and/or neural origin may be transduced locally at the ovarian level, thus explaining why luteolysis and ovarian cyclicity can proceed in the absence of the uterus in primates. However, it remains to be established whether the intraovarian process of luteolysis is mediated by arachidonic acid and/or its metabolite PGF2alpha and whether the central oxytocin pulse generator identified in nonprimate species plays a mediatory role during luteolysis in primates. Regardless of the mechanism, intraovarian luteolysis in primates (progesterone withdrawal) appears to be the primary stimulus for the subsequent production of endometrial prostaglandins associated with menstruation. In contrast, luteolysis in nonprimate species appears to depend on the prior production of endometrial prostaglandins. In primates, uterine prostaglandin production may reflect a vestigial mechanism that has been retained during evolution from an earlier dependence on uterine prostaglandin production for luteolysis.