Volatile anaesthetics antagonize nitrous oxide and morphine-induced analgesia in the rat

Antinociceptive Agents as General Anesthetic Adjuncts: Supra-additive and Infra-additive Interactions

The hypothesis "General anesthesia consists of producing both loss of consciousness and the inhibition of noxious stimuli reaching the brain and causing arousal" was used as a basis for the review of published data on general anesthetic interactions with antinociceptive agents: opioids, α 2 adrenergic agonists, and systemic sodium channel blockers. This review is focused on a specific type of anesthetic interaction-the transformation of antinociceptive agents into general anesthetic adjuncts. The primary aim is to answer 2 questions. First, how does an antinociceptive agent transform the effect of an anesthetic in providing a certain component of anesthesia-hypnosis, immobility, or hemodynamic response to noxious stimulation? Second, does a combination of an anesthetic with an adjunct result in a simple summation of their respective effects or in a supra-additive or infra-additive interaction? The Medline database was searched for data describing the interactions of antinociceptive agents and general anesthetics. The following classes of antinociceptive agents were considered: opioids, α 2 adrenergic agonists, and systemic sodium channel blockers. Drugs used in combination with antinociceptive agents were general anesthetics and benzodiazepines. The following terms related to drug interactions were used: anesthetic interactions, synergy, antagonism, isobolographic analysis, response surface analysis, and fractional analysis. The interactions of antinociceptive agents with general anesthetics result in a decrease of general anesthetic requirements, which differ for each of the components of general anesthesia: hypnosis, immobility, and hemodynamic response to noxious stimulation. Most studies of the nature of anesthetic interactions are related to opioid-general anesthetic combinations, and their conclusions usually confirm supra-additivity.

Effects of general anesthetics on substance P release and c-Fos expression in the spinal dorsal horn

BACKGROUND

The authors examined in vivo the effects of general anesthetics on evoked substance P release (primary afferent excitability) and c-Fos expression (neuronal activation) in superficial dorsal horn.

METHODS

Rats received saline, propofol (100 mg/kg), pentobarbital (50 mg/kg), isoflurane (2 minimum alveolar concentration), nitrous oxide (66%), or fentanyl (30 μg/kg). During anesthesia, rats received intraplantar 5% formalin (50 μl) to left hind paw. Ten minutes later, rats underwent transcardial perfusion with 4% paraformaldehyde. Substance P release from small primary afferents was assessed by incidence of neurokinin 1 receptor internalization in the superficial dorsal horn. In separate studies, rats were sacrificed after 2 h and c-Fos expression measured.

RESULTS

Intraplantar formalin-induced robust neurokinin 1 receptor internalization in ipsilateral dorsal horn (ipsilateral: 54 ± 6% [mean ± SEM], contralateral: 12 ± 2%; P < 0.05; n = 4). Fentanyl, but not propofol, pentobarbital, isoflurane, nor nitrous oxide alone inhibited neurokinin 1 receptor internalization. However, 2 minimum alveolar concentration isoflurane + nitrous oxide reduced neurokinin 1 receptor internalization (27 ± 3%; P < 0.05; n = 5). All agents reduced c-Fos expression (control: 34 ± 4, fentanyl: 8 ± 2, isoflurane: 12 ± 3, nitrous oxide: 11 ± 2, isoflurane + nitrous oxide: 12 ± 1, pentobarbital: 11 ± 2, propofol: 13 ± 3; P < 0.05; n = 3).

CONCLUSION

General anesthetics at anesthetic concentrations block spinal neuron activation through a mechanism that is independent of an effect on small primary afferent peptide release. The effect of fentanyl alone and the synergistic effect of isoflurane and nitrous oxide on substance P release suggest a correlative rationale for the therapeutic use of these anesthetic protocols by blocking nociceptive afferent transmitter release and preventing the initiation of cascade, which is immediately postsynaptic to the primary afferent.

Noxious stimulation excites serotonergic neurons: a comparison between the lateral paragigantocellular reticular and the raphe magnus nuclei

The present study was designed to record electrophysiological responses to graded noxious thermal stimuli of serotonergic and nonserotonergic neurons in the lateral paragigantocellular reticular (LPGi) and the raphe magnus (RMg) nuclei in rats. All of the neurons recorded were juxtacellularly filled with neurobiotin and identified with double immunofluorescent labeling for both neurobiotin and serotonin. Under halothane anesthesia (0.75%), noxious thermal stimuli ⩾48°C activated almost all (88%) of the serotonergic neurons located within the LPGi (n=16). The increase in firing was clear (3.4±0.3spike/s: mean of responses above the population median) and sustained during the whole application of strong thermal noxious stimuli, with a high mean threshold (48.3±0.3°C) and large receptive fields. Recording of serotonergic neurons in the RMg (n=21) demonstrated that the proportion of strongly activated (>2spike/s) neurons (19% vs 59% for the LPGi) as well as the magnitude of the activation (2.1±0.4spike/s: mean of responses above the population median) to thermal noxious stimuli were significantly lower than in the LPGi (P<.05). Within the boundaries of both the LPGi and the RMg (B3 group), nonserotonergic neurons were also predominantly excited (75%) by noxious stimuli, and the resulting activation (7.9±1.2spike/s) was even greater than that of serotonergic neurons. Thermal noxious stimuli-induced activation of LPGi serotonergic cells probably plays a key role in serotonin-mediated modulations of cardiac baroreflex and transmission of nociceptive messages occurring under such intense noxious conditions.

Nitrous oxide acutely suppresses ethanol consumption in HAD and P rats

Nitrous oxide (N2O) has been reported to reduce post-withdrawal craving in alcoholic humans, aiding in their continued abstinence. This article assessed the ability of N2O to suppress alcohol drinking in genetically selected high alcohol-drinking (HAD) and alcohol-preferring (P) rats. Although water was available ad libitum, they were accustomed to a limited access (1 h/day) choice between 10% ethanol (EtOH) and water. When drinking stabilized, the rats were exposed for 30, 60, or 120 min to a mixture of N2O and pure oxygen, timed to end 1 h before the limited access. N2O suppressed EtOH consumption at 1, but not 25 h after exposure in both HAD and P rats. This result is consistent with the efficacy of N2O for acute reduction of EtOH drinking, and supports further research into the use of N2O as an adjunct to treatment.

Large concentrations of nitrous oxide decrease the isoflurane minimum alveolar concentration sparing effect of morphine in the rat

Many adjuvant drugs have demonstrated anesthetic-sparing properties when combined with volatile anesthetics. Nitrous oxide is combined with volatile anesthetics to reduce the concentrations of volatile anesthetics required to produce anesthesia. Analgesic doses of opioids clearly reduce the requirement for inhaled anesthetics in both human patients and experimental animals. We performed this study to determine whether the combination of nitrous oxide and morphine decreased isoflurane minimum alveolar anesthetic concentration (MAC) even further in the rat. Fifty-eight female rats were used. The rats were divided into 8 groups: isoflurane in 4 possible nitrous oxide concentrations (0%, 30%, 50%, or 70%) with saline or morphine (1 mg/kg). Then the MAC of isoflurane (MAC(ISO))was determined from alveolar gas samples at the time of tail clamp. The MAC of isoflurane was significantly different at each nitrous oxide concentration, and increasing nitrous oxide concentrations reduced anesthetic requirements for isoflurane. The administration of morphine reduced the MAC(ISO) when used with 0% or 30% nitrous oxide. This MAC(ISO) by morphine reduction was less with 50% nitrous oxide and nonexistent at 70% nitrous oxide. However, with morphine present the MAC(ISO) was independent of the nitrous oxide concentration in the 30%-70% range.

General anesthetics inhibit the nitrous-oxide-induced activation of corticotropin releasing factor containing neurons in rats

The activation of intracerebral corticotropin releasing factor (CRF) system is involved in nitrous oxide analgesia. We evaluated the effect of general anesthetics on nitrous-oxide-induced CRF activation and antinociception. Male Sprague-Dawley rats inhaled isoflurane (0%, 0.6%, 1.0% and 1.5%) or were administered with intravenous propofol (0, 0.1 and 0.2 mg/kg/min), with or without 75% nitrous oxide inhalation, for 90 min. The brain was fixed with fixative, and brain sections, including the paraventricular nucleus of the hypothalamus, were double immunostained with c-Fos and CRF antibodies to assess the activation of CRF-containing neurons. In other groups of rats, the effect of propofol on nitrous oxide antinociception was evaluated with tail flick latency tests. Both inhaled isoflurane and intravenous propofol inhibited nitrous-oxide-induced activation of CRF neurons, suggesting that these general anesthetics may inhibit one of the analgesic mechanisms of nitrous oxide. Indeed, propofol inhibited the antinociceptive action of nitrous oxide, as evaluated with tail flick latencies (TFL).

Can Determining the Minimum Alveolar Anesthetic Concentration of Volatile Anesthetic Be Used as an Objective Tool to Assess Antinociception in Animals?

We intended to evaluate the reliability of the minimum anesthetic alveolar concentration (MAC)-sparing effect as an objective measure of the antinociceptive properties of a drug. For this purpose, we tested different variables and analyzed the significance of the results obtained. In a first set of experiments, we studied rats under mechanical ventilation and sevoflurane anesthesia. Outcome variables such as gross purposeful movements consecutive to tail clamping, paw withdrawal consecutive to increasing pressure, and cardio-circulatory reactivity (MACBAR) after these stimuli were recorded. In a second set of experiment, sevoflurane-anesthetized rats under spontaneous breathing conditions were used. Thermal stimuli were compared with pressure. The MAC-sparing effect of several doses of sufentanil and clonidine was evaluated in both anesthetized and awake rodents. When considering the stimulus applied, larger concentrations of sevoflurane were required to suppress reactivity after tail clamp than after paw pressure or radiant heat (1.81 +/- 0.28 versus 1.45 +/- 0.22 and 1.53 +/- 0.26; P < 0.05). For the two first stimuli, no significant differences were noted between the concentrations that suppress motor or cardio-circulatory reactions. All doses of sufentanil tested significantly reduced (P < 0.05) the different MAC values except the smallest one (0.005 micro g x kg(-1) x min(-1)) that significantly increased MACBAR in ventilated animals and both MAC and MACBAR in spontaneously breathing rodents (P < 0.05). Clonidine, at its optimal dose (10 micro g/kg), significantly reduced both MAC and MACBAR to the same degree. In awake animals submitted to radiant heat or pressure challenge, none of the clonidine doses nor sufentanil doses (0.005 and 0.07) were active. In conclusion, the MAC-sparing effect provides several reliable and quantifiable variables that allow comparison between different analgesic substances. However, the observations made are not simply the result of antinociceptive effects of the tested drugs but rather that of complex interactions between these drugs and a halogenated vapor.

IMPLICATIONS

The MAC-sparing effect provides several variables that allow comparison between different analgesic substances. However, the observations made are not simply the result of the antinociceptive effects of the tested drugs but rather the result of complex interactions between these drugs and a halogenated vapor.

The importance of tail temperature monitoring during tail-flick test in evaluating the antinociceptive action of volatile anesthetics

BACKGROUND

Tail-flick (TF) latency can be influenced by tail-skin temperature (TT), and treatments that raise TT can mimic hyperalgesia on a TF test. As volatile anesthetics can raise TT via heat redistribution, their antinociceptive action can be hidden or obscured in a TF test. We tested the hypothesis that TT monitoring improves the efficiency of TF tests in evaluating the antinociceptive action of volatile anesthetics.

METHODS

The relationship between TT and TF latency was first explored under varied TTs in 12 rats. Then, TT and TF latency were measured before and during isoflurane exposure (1.2%). In the low temperature group (n=6), rats were prewarmed mildly to increase TT during isoflurane exposure. In the high temperature group (n=6), rats were prewarmed enough to prevent a TT increase during isoflurane exposure.

RESULTS

There was a highly significant correlation between TT and TF latency, that is, TF latency decreased as TT increased. In the low temperature group, there was a significant increase in TT during isoflurane exposure, while an increase in TF latency did not reach statistical significance. Tail-flick latency corrected by a change in TT showed a significant increase. In the high temperature group, TF latency increased significantly during isoflurane exposure without an increase in TT.

CONCLUSIONS

Isoflurane inhalation can induce an increase in TT, which can obscure its antinociceptive action as evaluated by a TF test. Monitoring TT during a TF test is important to efficiently evaluate the antinociceptive action of volatile anesthetics.

Neurobiology of nitrous oxide-induced antinociceptive effects

Nitrous oxide (N2O), or laughing gas, has been used for clinical anesthesia for more than a century and is still commonly used. While the anesthetic/hypnotic mechanisms of N2O remain largely unknown, the underlying mechanisms of its analgesic/antinociceptive effects have been elucidated during the last several decades. Evidence to date indicate that N2O induces opioid peptide release in the periaqueductal gray area of the midbrain leading to the activation of the descending inhibitory pathways, which results in modulation of the pain/nociceptive processing in the spinal cord. The types of opioid peptide induced by N2O and the subtypes of opioid receptors that mediate the antinociceptive effects of N2O appear to depend on various factors including the species and/or strain, the regions of the brain, and the paradigms of behavior testing used for the experiments. Among three types of descending inhibitory pathways, the descending noradrenergic inhibitory pathway seems to play the most prominent role. The specific elements involved are now being resolved.

Antisense oligonucleotides to N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor subunits attenuate formalin-induced nociception in the rat

Noxious peripheral stimuli increase the sensitivity of central nociceptive neurons to subsequent noxious stimuli. This occurs in part through activation of spinal N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) receptors. These receptors are heteromeric complexes of NMDA-R1 and NMDA-R2 A--D subunits. NMDA-R1 is necessary for the formation of functional NMDA receptors whereas the R2 subunits (A-D) modify the properties of the receptor. However, the role of the various receptor subtypes in nociception has not been established. In this study, we used intrathecally administered phosphodiester antisense oligonucleotides (ODEs) to examine the role of the NMDA-R1, NMDA-R2C and NMDA-R2D subunits in the mediation of formalin-induced nociception in the rat. The antisense ODEs against the NMDA-R1 and NMDAR-2C subunits reduced nociceptive behaviors whereas the corresponding sense ODEs had no effect. In contrast, nociception was unaffected by the antisense ODE to NMDAR-2D. Using an RNase protection assay, we also found that each antisense ODE selectively decreased the level of the corresponding mRNA in the lumbar spinal cord but that the sense ODEs had no such effect. Accordingly, these data provide evidence that the R1 and R2C subunits, but not R2D, of the NMDA receptor participate in the development of formalin-induced nociception.

Physiological properties of the lamina I spinoparabrachial neurons in the rat

Single-unit extracellular recordings of spino-parabrachial (spino-PB) neurons (n = 53) antidromically driven from the contralateral parabrachial (PB) area were performed in the lumbar cord in anesthetized rats. All the spino-PB neurons were located in the lamina I of the dorsal horn. Their axons exhibited conduction velocities between 2.8 and 27.8 m/s, in the thin myelinated fibers range. They had an extremely low spontaneous activity (median = 0. 064 Hz) and a small excitatory receptive field (</=2 toes or pads). They were all activated by both peripheral A (mainly Adelta) and C fibers after intense transcutaneous electrical stimulation. Their discharge always increased in response to noxious natural stimuli of increasing intensities. The great majority (75%) of spino-PB neurons were nociceptive specific, i.e., they were excited only by noxious stimuli. The remaining (25%) still were excited primarily by noxious stimuli but also responded moderately to innocuous stimuli. Almost all spino-PB neurons (92%, 49/53) were activated by both mechanical and heat noxious stimuli. Among them, 35% were in addition moderately activated by noxious cold (thresholds between +20 and -10 degrees C). Only (8%, 4/53) responded exclusively to noxious heat. Spino-PB neurons clearly encoded the intensity of mechanical (n = 39) and thermal (n = 38) stimuli in the noxious range, and most of the individual stimulus-response functions were monotonic and positive up to 40/60 N. cm(-2) and 50 degrees C, respectively. For the mechanical modality, the mean threshold was 11.5 +/- 1.25 N. cm(-2) (mean +/- SE), the response increased almost linearly with the logarithm of the pressure between 10 and 60 N. cm(-2), the mean p(50) (pressure evoking 50% of the maximum response) and the maximum responsiveness were: 30 +/- 2.4 N. cm(-2) and 40.5 +/- 5 Hz, respectively. For the thermal modality, the mean threshold was 43.6 +/- 0.5 degrees C, the mean curve had a general sigmoid aspect, the steepest portion being in the 46-48 degrees C interval, the mean t(50) and the maximum responsiveness were: 47.4 +/- 0.3 degrees C and 40 +/- 4.4 Hz, respectively. Most of the spino-PB neurons tested (13/16) had their noxiously evoked responses clearly inhibited by heterotopic noxious stimuli. The mean response to noxious stimuli during heterotopic stimuli was 31.7 +/- 6.1% of the control response. We conclude that the nociceptive properties of the lamina I spino-PB neurons are reflected largely by those of PB neurons that were suggested to be involved in autonomic and emotional/aversive aspects of pain.

The effects of subanesthetic concentrations of sevoflurane and nitrous oxide, alone and in combination, on analgesia, mood, and psychomotor performance in healthy volunteers

We studied the effects of subanesthetic concentrations of sevoflurane and nitrous oxide, alone and in combination, on analgesia, mood, and psychomotor performance in human volunteers. We hypothesized that nitrous oxide and sevoflurane would produce both opposing and potentiating effects within the same study. Over the course of three sessions, 20 subjects inhaled 0%, 0.2%, or 0.4% end-tidal sevoflurane for a 68-min period that was divided into four 17-min blocks. During either the second or fourth block, 30% end-tidal nitrous oxide was added to the concentration of sevoflurane being inhaled. Pain response, psychomotor performance, and mood were evaluated during the second and fourth blocks. Pain ratings were higher when sevoflurane and nitrous oxide were administered together than when nitrous oxide was administered alone, which indicates that sevoflurane attenuated the analgesic effects of nitrous oxide. Sevoflurane increased self-reported ratings of sleepiness, and the addition of nitrous oxide decreased these ratings. Nitrous oxide potentiated psychomotor impairment that was induced by sevoflurane. The combination of sevoflurane and nitrous oxide produced both opposing and potentiating effects within the same study. The results suggest that nitrous oxide and sevoflurane may act through different neurochemical mechanisms on some end points, such as analgesia and sleepiness.

IMPLICATIONS

Healthy volunteers inhaled subanesthetic concentrations of sevoflurane and nitrous oxide. Sevoflurane made nitrous oxide less effective as an analgesic, and nitrous oxide made sevoflurane less effective as a sedative. The two drugs may work at cross purposes on different end points of anesthesia.

Improved postoperative analgesia with isoflurane than with propofol anaesthesia

PURPOSE

The impact of hypnotic drugs on postoperative analgesia has not been evaluated. We compared the influence of the maintenance of anaesthesia with either propofol or isoflurane on postoperative pain.

METHODS

Forty ASA 1-2 women, undergoing cosmetic abdominoplasty were randomized to receive either 6-12 mg.kg-1.hr-1 propofol i.v. (P, n = 20) or MAC 1-1.5 isoflurane inhalation (Iso, n = 20). The lungs were ventilated with N2O 60% and O2 40%, and 1 microgram.kg-1 fentanyl i.v. provided intraoperative analgesia. Before surgical closure, 2 g propacetamol i.v. were administered. Postoperative analgesia was provided after hourly assessment of pain (VAS 0-100 mm), with 10 mg nalbuphine i.v. if VAS > or = 50 mm, during the eight hours after surgery. Sedation score (awake 0 to unrousable 4) was also recorded. Analgesia satisfaction score (nil 0 to excellent 4) obtained from the patient on discharge.

RESULTS

Sedation scores were similar in both groups except in the first postoperative hour, when it was higher in the Iso group. The VAS at rest (15.4 +/- 18.6 vs 29.7 +/- 19.8 mm, P = 0.0001) and nalbuphine requirements (0.13 +/- 0.35 vs 0.70 +/- 0.80 doses, P = 0.004) were lower in the Iso group during the first six hours, although emesis was more frequent than in P (60 vs 25%; P = 0.03). The incidence of analgesia satisfaction score (> or = 3) was similar between the two groups (P: 95; Iso: 75%).

CONCLUSION

These results suggested that isoflurane anaesthesia provides better analgesia than propofol anaesthesia in the first six hours after abdominoplasty.

Desflurane and nitrous oxide, but not nonimmobilizers, affect nociceptive responses

Nonimmobilizers (previously called nonanesthetics) do not prevent movement in response to a noxious stimulus, even at doses predicted to produce anesthesia. We hypothesized they would also lack antinociceptive effects. We tested this prediction using the tail-flick latency (TFL) test. As predicted, the two nonimmobilizers tested (1,2-dichlorohexafluorocyclobutane and perfluoropentane) did not alter TFL, whereas desflurane and nitrous oxide both lengthened TFL (nitrous oxide at a lower minimum alveolar anesthetic concentration [MAC]-multiple than desflurane). In addition, we found that 0.1 MAC desflurane had a hyperalgesic effect (shortened TFL).

IMPLICATIONS

We studied the response of animals inhaling anesthetics or nonimmobilizers (compounds predicted to be anesthetics from the Meyer-Overton relation) to painful stimuli. Nonimmobilizers had no effect on these responses; at a low partial pressure, desflurane was hyperalgesic; nitrous oxide and, at higher partial pressures, desflurane were antinociceptive.