I.v. ketoprofen for analgesia after tonsillectomy: comparison of pre- and post-operative administration

Pre-emptive and preventive NSAIDs for postoperative pain in adults undergoing all types of surgery

BACKGROUND

Postoperative pain is a common consequence of surgery and can have many negative perioperative effects. It has been suggested that the administration of analgesia before a painful stimulus may improve pain control. We defined pre-emptive nonsteroidal anti-inflammatories (NSAIDs) as those given before surgery but not continued afterwards and preventive NSAIDs as those given before surgery and continued afterwards. These were compared to a control group given the NSAIDs after surgery instead of before surgery.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the efficacy of preventive and pre-emptive NSAIDs for reducing postoperative pain in adults undergoing all types of surgery.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched the following electronic databases: CENTRAL, MEDLINE, Embase, AMED and CINAHL (up to June 2020). In addition, we searched for unpublished studies in three clinical trial databases, conference proceedings, grey literature databases, and reference lists of retrieved articles. We did not apply any restrictions on language or date of publication.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We included parallel-group randomized controlled trials (RCTs) only. We included adult participants undergoing any type of surgery. We defined pre-emptive NSAIDs as those given before surgery but not continued afterwards and preventive NSAIDs as those given before surgery and continued afterwards. These were compared to a control group given the NSAIDs after surgery instead of before surgery. We included studies that gave the medication by any route but not given on the skin.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

We used the standard methods expected by Cochrane, as well as a novel publication bias test developed by our research group. We used GRADE to assess the certainty of the evidence for each outcome. Outcomes included acute postoperative pain (minimal clinically important difference (MCID): 1.5 on a 0-10 scale), adverse events of NSAIDs, nausea and vomiting, 24-hour morphine consumption (MCID: 10 mg reduction), time to analgesic request (MCID: one hour), pruritus, sedation, patient satisfaction, chronic pain and time to first bowel movement (MCID: 12 hours).

MAIN RESULTS

We included 71 RCTs. Seven studies are awaiting classification. We included 45 studies that evaluated pre-emptive NSAIDs and 26 studies that evaluated preventive NSAIDs. We considered only four studies to be at low risk of bias for most domains. The operations and NSAIDs used varied, although most studies were conducted in abdominal, orthopaedic and dental surgery. Most studies were conducted in secondary care and in low-risk participants. Common exclusions were participants on analgesic medications prior to surgery and those with chronic pain. Pre-emptive NSAIDs compared to post-incision NSAIDs For pre-emptive NSAIDs, there is probably a decrease in early acute postoperative pain (MD -0.69, 95% CI -0.97 to -0.41; studies = 36; participants = 2032; I2 = 96%; moderate-certainty evidence). None of the included studies that reported on acute postoperative pain reported adverse events as an outcome. There may be little or no difference between the groups in short-term (RR 1.00, 95% CI 0.34 to 2.94; studies = 2; participants = 100; I2 = 0%; low-certainty evidence) or long-term nausea and vomiting (RR 0.85, 95% CI 0.52 to 1.38; studies = 5; participants = 228; I2 = 29%; low-certainty evidence). There may be a reduction in late acute postoperative pain (MD -0.22, 95% CI -0.44 to 0.00; studies = 28; participants = 1645; I2 = 97%; low-certainty evidence). There may be a reduction in 24-hour morphine consumption with pre-emptive NSAIDs (MD -5.62 mg, 95% CI -9.00 mg to -2.24 mg; studies = 16; participants = 854; I2 = 99%; low-certainty evidence) and an increase in the time to analgesic request (MD 17.04 minutes, 95% CI 3.77 minutes to 30.31 minutes; studies = 18; participants = 975; I2 = 95%; low-certainty evidence). There may be little or no difference in opioid adverse events such as pruritus (RR 0.40, 95% CI 0.09 to 1.76; studies = 4; participants = 254; I2 = 0%; low-certainty evidence) or sedation (RR 0.51, 95% CI 0.16 to 1.68; studies = 4; participants = 281; I2 = 0%; low-certainty evidence), although the number of included studies for these outcomes was small. No study reported patient satisfaction, chronic pain or time to first bowel movement for pre-emptive NSAIDs. Preventive NSAIDs compared to post-incision NSAIDs For preventive NSAIDs, there may be little or no difference in early acute postoperative pain (MD -0.14, 95% CI -0.39 to 0.12; studies = 18; participants = 1140; I2 = 75%; low-certainty evidence). One study reported adverse events from NSAIDs (reoperation for bleeding) although the events were low which did not allow any meaningful conclusions to be drawn (RR 1.95; 95% CI 0.18 to 20.68). There may be little or no difference in rates of short-term (RR 1.26, 95% CI 0.49 to 3.30; studies = 1; participants = 76; low-certainty evidence) or long-term (RR 0.85, 95% CI 0.52 to 1.38; studies = 5; participants = 456; I2 = 29%; low-certainty evidence) nausea and vomiting. There may be a reduction in late acute postoperative pain (MD -0.33, 95% CI -0.59 to -0.07; studies = 21; participants = 1441; I2 = 81%; low-certainty evidence). There is probably a reduction in 24-hour morphine consumption (MD -1.93 mg, 95% CI -3.55 mg to -0.32 mg; studies = 16; participants = 1323; I2 = 49%; moderate-certainty evidence). It is uncertain if there is any difference in time to analgesic request (MD 8.51 minutes, 95% CI -31.24 minutes to 48.27 minutes; studies = 8; participants = 410; I2 = 98%; very low-certainty evidence). As with pre-emptive NSAIDs, there may be little or no difference in other opioid adverse events such as pruritus (RR 0.56, 95% CI 0.09 to 3.35; studies = 3; participants = 211; I2 = 0%; low-certainty evidence) and sedation (RR 0.84, 95% CI 0.44 to 1.63; studies = 5; participants = 497; I2 = 0%; low-certainty evidence). There is probably little or no difference in patient satisfaction (MD -0.42; 95% CI -1.09 to 0.25; studies = 1; participants = 72; moderate-certainty evidence). No study reported on chronic pain. There is probably little or no difference in time to first bowel movement (MD 0.00; 95% CI -15.99 to 15.99; studies = 1; participants = 76; moderate-certainty evidence).

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

There was some evidence that pre-emptive and preventive NSAIDs reduce both pain and morphine consumption, although this was not universal for all pain and morphine consumption outcomes. Any differences found were not clinically significant, although we cannot exclude this in more painful operations. Moreover, without any evidence of reductions in opioid adverse effects, the clinical significance of these results is questionable although few studies reported these outcomes. Only one study reported clinically significant adverse events from NSAIDs administered before surgery and, therefore, we have very few data to assess the safety of either pre-emptive or preventive NSAIDs. Therefore, future research should aim to adhere to the highest methodology and be adequately powered to assess serious adverse events of NSAIDs and reductions in opioid adverse events.

Safety and Efficacy of Single-Dose Ketorolac for Postoperative Pain Management After Primary Palatoplasty: A Prospective Cohort Study With Historical Controls

OBJECTIVE

To analyze safety and efficacy of single-dose ketorolac after primary palatoplasty (PP).

DESIGN

Consecutive cohort of patients undergoing PP, comparing to historical controls. Setting: A large academic children's hospital.

PATIENTS, PARTICIPANTS

A consecutive cohort of 111 patients undergoing PP (study n = 47) compared to historical controls (n = 64).

INTERVENTIONS

All patients received intraoperative acetaminophen, dexmedetomidine, and opioids while the study group received an additional single dose of ketorolac (0.5 mg/kg) at the conclusion of PP.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Safety of ketorolac was measured by significant bleeding complications and need for supplementary oxygen. Efficacy was assessed through bleeding, Face Legs Activity Cry Consolability (FLACC) scale, and opioid dose.

RESULTS

Length of stay was similar for both groups (control group 38.5 hours [95% CI: 3.6-43.3] versus study group 37.6 hours [95% CI: 31.3-44.0], P = .84). There were no significant differences in all postoperative FLACC scales. The mean dose of opioid rescue medication measured as morphine milligram equivalents did not differ between groups (P = .56). Significant postoperative hemorrhage was not observed.

CONCLUSIONS

This is the first prospective study to evaluate the safety and efficacy of single-dose ketorolac after PP. Although lack of standardization between study and historical control groups may have precluded observation of an analgesic benefit, analysis demonstrated a single dose of ketorolac after PP is safe. Further investigations with more patients and different postoperative regimens may clarify the role of ketorolac in improving pain after PP.

Systematic review of analgesics and dexamethasone for post-tonsillectomy pain in adults

BACKGROUND

Intense pain can last several days after tonsillectomy. It is often undertreated and improved analgesic strategies that can be safely used at home are needed.

METHODS

We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis on the effectiveness of systemic medications used for post-tonsillectomy pain in adult and adolescent (13 yr old) patients. Studies were identified from PubMed, the Cochrane Library, and by hand searching reference lists from studies and review articles. Randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled studies reporting on pain intensity or use of rescue analgesia were included.

RESULTS

Twenty-nine randomised controlled trials representing 1816 subjects met the inclusion criteria. Follow-up time was ≤24 h in 15 studies, in which the majority were taking nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs. Thirteen studies were suitable for meta-analysis. In pooled analysis, paracetamol, dexamethasone, and gabapentinoids reduced pain intensity on the day of operation. In individual studies, ketoprofen, ibuprofen, lornoxicam, parecoxib, rofecoxib, indomethacin and dextromethorphan reduced pain intensity, need for rescue analgesics, or both on the day of operation. Oral celecoxib for 2 postoperative weeks or i.v. ketamine on the day of operation were not effective at the studied doses. Dexamethasone in multiple doses provided analgesia beyond 1 postoperative day. Pain was moderate to strong in both study and control groups during the first postoperative week.

CONCLUSIONS

Single analgesics and dexamethasone provide only a weak to moderate effect for post-tonsillectomy pain on the day of operation and thus a multimodal analgesic strategy is recommended. Short follow-up times and clinical heterogeneity of studies limit the usefulness of results.

Absorption of ibuprofen orodispersible tablets in early postoperative phase - a pharmacokinetic study

OBJECTIVE

Patient-controlled oral analgesia has gained popularity in postoperative pain management. Anesthesia and surgery delay gastrointestinal tract function and this may therefore decrease bioavailability of drugs taken by mouth. To hasten absorption, an orodispersible ibuprofen tablet has been developed. In this study, we evaluated the pharmacokinetics and feasibility of orodispersible ibuprofen tablets in spine surgery patients.

METHODS

The study design was a prospective clinical trial where each patient served as her/his own control. Fifteen patients aged 19-75 years were given two orodispersible ibuprofen 200 mg tablets the day before surgery and two more tablets immediately after surgery. Blood samples for ibuprofen concentrations were taken at intervals for 6 hours following pre- and postsurgical administration of ibuprofen.

RESULTS

The mean preoperative area under time-concentration curve for ibuprofen (AUC_0-360) was 4806 (SD 1104) min·mg/L, and after surgery it was 2141 (583) min·mg/L (mean difference 2664, 95% CI for difference 2003 to 3325, p < .001). The mean of the maximum preoperative plasma concentration of ibuprofen was three times higher, 26.7 (7.7) mg/L, than the postoperative value of 8.6 (2.1) mg/L (mean diff. 18.1, 95% CI 13.9 to 22.4, p < .001). Times to maximum concentration were similar pre- and postoperatively at 155 (58) minutes and 169 (113) minutes (p = .67). No serious or unexpected adverse events were recorded.

CONCLUSIONS

While orodispersible ibuprofen tablets were feasible, ibuprofen absorption decreased immediately after surgery compared to the day before surgery. Thus, further studies are needed to establish the adequate initial postoperative dose.

The effect of flurbiprofen oral spray and ibuprofen vs ibuprofen alone on postoperative tonsillectomy pain: An open, randomised, controlled trial

OBJECTIVE

This prospective clinical study was carried out to evaluate the analgesic efficacy and safety of oral spray form of flurbiprofen in the treatment of postoperative pain in tonsillectomy patients.

STUDY DESIGN

Open, randomised, controlled clinical study.

SETTING

Tertiary care training and research hospital.

PARTICIPANTS

One hundred (53 males, 47 females) with an age range of 18-53 years old (mean 27.4 ± 9.3 SD) undergoing tonsillectomy were enrolled in this prospective controlled study.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Patients receiving oral ibuprofen and flurbiprofen as spray form were enrolled as study group (53), whereas patients receiving only oral ibuprofen were enrolled as control group (47) in postoperative period. Postoperative pain was evaluated through visual analogue scale on 12th hour, first, third and seventh days after surgery.

RESULTS

The mean maximal pain score of patients who have received flurbiprofen spray and ibuprofen was 3.36 ± 1.93 SD that was statistically lower than the mean maximal pain score of patients who were medicated with only ibuprofen which was 4.06 ± 1.29 SD on postoperative seventh day (P = .013).

CONCLUSION

This study revealed that addition of flurbiprofen spray to oral ibuprofen is effective in the management of postoperative pain in tonsillectomy patients with no notable complications.

Laparoscopic surgery: a narrative review of pharmacotherapy in pain management

Laparoscopic surgery is widespread, and an increasing number of surgeries are performed laparoscopically. Early pain after laparoscopy can be similar or even more severe than that after open surgery. Thus, proactive pain management should be provided. Pain after laparoscopic surgery is derived from multiple origins; therefore, a single agent is seldom sufficient. Pain is most effectively controlled by a multimodal, preventive analgesia approach, such as combining opioids with non-opioid analgesics and local anaesthetics. Wound and port site local anaesthetic injections decrease abdominal wall pain by 1-1.5 units on a 0-10 pain scale. Inflammatory pain and shoulder pain can be controlled by NSAIDs or corticosteroids. In some patient groups, adjuvant drugs, ketamine and α2-adrenergic agonists can be helpful, but evidence on gabapentinoids is conflicting. In the present review, the types of pain that need to be taken into account while planning pain management protocols and the wide range of analgesic options that have been assessed in laparoscopic surgery are critically assessed. Recommendations to the clinician will be made regarding how to manage acute pain and how to prevent persistent postoperative pain. It is important to identify patients at the highest risk for severe and prolonged post-operative pain, and to have a proactive strategy in place for these individuals.

A Dose-Finding Study of Dexketoprofen in Patients Undergoing Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy: A Randomized Clinical Trial on Effects on the Analgesic Concentration of Oxycodone

Background

Dexketoprofen has been shown to provide efficient analgesia and an opioid-sparing effect after orthopedic surgery. In this dose-finding study, we evaluated the analgesic efficacy and opioid-sparing effect of dexketoprofen administered intravenously (i.v.) after laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LCC).

Methods

Twenty-four patients undergoing LCC were randomized to receive dexketoprofen 10 or 50 mg i.v. 15 min before the end of the surgery. Subjects were provided with 0.2 mg/kg of oxycodone at anesthesia induction. In the recovery room, pain was assessed with an 11-point numerical rating scale (NRS; score of 0 = no pain, score of 10 = most severe pain) every 10 min. When the NRS score was ≥3/10 at rest or ≥5/10 at wound compression, a plasma sample was taken for analysis of oxycodone [to determine the minimum effective concentration (MEC)], its metabolites, and dexketoprofen. After that, subjects were titrated with oxycodone 2 or 3 mg i.v. every 10 min until the NRS score was <3/10 at rest and <5/10 at wound compression. At this point, a second plasma sample was taken for analysis of oxycodone [minimum effective analgesic concentration (MEAC)], its metabolites, and dexketoprofen.

Results

At the onset of pain, the plasma oxycodone concentrations (MEC) were similar in the two groups: median 60 ng/mL (range 37–73) in the 10 mg group and median 52 ng/mL (range 24–79) in the 50 mg group. At the time of pain relief, the MEACs were 98 ng/mL (range 59–150) in the 10 mg group and 80 ng/mL (range 45–128) in the 50 mg group. The total doses of oxycodone needed to achieve pain relief were similar: 0.11 mg/kg (range 0–0.33) in the 10 mg group and 0.08 mg/kg (range 0–0.24) in the 50 mg group. Eleven subjects developed mild desaturation or a decreased respiratory rate after oxycodone titration.

Conclusion

In the present double-blinded, randomized clinical trial, the need for a rescue opioid analgesic, oxycodone, was similar with the two dose levels of dexketoprofen—10 and 50 mg i.v.—after LCC.

A 2013 updated systematic review & meta-analysis of 36 randomized controlled trials; no apparent effects of non steroidal anti-inflammatory agents on the risk of bleeding after tonsillectomy

BACKGROUND

Although the literature suggests that non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) are effective in controlling post-operative pain in the paediatric population, physicians have been reluctant to utilise these medications after tonsillectomy due to concerns of increased bleeding rates. While many surgeons prescribe opioid analgesics postoperatively, these are associated with a number of potential adverse side-effects including nausea, vomiting, constipation, excessive sedation and respiratory compromise.

OBJECTIVE OF REVIEW

To compare bleeding rates and severity between recipients of NSAIDs versus placebo or opioid analgesics for tonsillectomy.

SEARCH STRATEGY

Two authors independently searched electronic databases including PubMed, OVID, EMBASE and Cochrane Review from inception to July 2012. The keywords used included: Adenotonsillectomy, Tonsillectomy, Analgesia, Bleeding, Perioperative and Postoperative. These were then combined in various combinations with specific NSAIDs.

EVALUATION METHOD

A systematic review and meta-analysis of all randomised control trials comparing bleeding rates and severity between NSAIDs versus placebo or opioids post-tonsillectomy.

RESULTS

A total of 36 studies met our inclusion criteria including 1747 children and 1446 adults. When all of the studies were combined in a meta-analysis using the most severe outcome, there was no increased risk of bleeding in those using NSAIDs after tonsillectomy. Use of NSAIDs in general [1.30 (0.90-1.88)] or in children [1.06 (0.65-1.74)] was not associated with increased risk of bleeding in general, most severe bleeding, secondary haemorrhage, readmission or need of reoperation due to bleeding. Similarly, there was no increased bleeding risk for specific NSAIDs in adults. In the studies looking at paediatric subjects, the overall odds ratio of bleeding was even lower than in the general population and not significant. This result is based on 18 studies, six of which had zero outcomes in either treatment arm. Similar to the general population analysis, there was no significant difference in any of the subanalyses: bleeds treated with reoperation, readmission or bleeds in children that could be managed conservatively. There were also no significant differences in the subanalyses of individual NSAIDs. Similarly, there was no significant difference in rates of bleeding in the subanalysis of studies that gave NSAIDs multiple times, for instance, both before and after surgery.

CONCLUSIONS

These results suggest that NSAIDs can be considered as a safe method of analgesia among children undergoing tonsillectomy.

Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and perioperative bleeding in paediatric tonsillectomy

BACKGROUND

Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) are used for pain relief following tonsillectomy in children. However, as they inhibit platelet aggregation and prolong bleeding time they could cause increased perioperative bleeding. The overall risk remains unclear. This review was originally published in 2005 and was updated in 2010 and in 2012.

OBJECTIVES

The primary objective of this review was to assess the effects of NSAIDs on bleeding with paediatric tonsillectomy. Our secondary outcome was to establish whether NSAIDs affect the incidence of other postoperative complications when compared to other forms of analgesia.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) (The Cochrane Library 2012, Issue 10); MEDLINE (inception until October 2012); EMBASE (inception until October 2012); Current Problems (produced by the UK Medicines Control Agency), MedWatch (produced by the US Food and Drug Administration) and the Australian Adverse Drug Reactions Bulletins (to May 2010). The original search was performed in August 2004. We also contacted manufacturers and researchers in the field.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We included randomized controlled trials assessing NSAIDs in children, up to and including 16 years of age, undergoing elective tonsillectomy or adenotonsillectomy.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two authors independently assessed trial quality and extracted the data. We contacted study authors for additional information, where necessary.

MAIN RESULTS

We included 15 studies that involved 1101 children in this updated review. One study was added as a result of our 2012 search, another previously included study was removed due to lack of randomization. Fourteen included studies compared NSAIDs with other analgesics or placebo and reported on bleeding requiring surgical intervention. The use of NSAIDs was associated with a non-significant increase in the risk of bleeding requiring surgical intervention: Peto odds ratio (OR) 1.69 (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.71 to 4.01). Ten studies involving 365 children reported perioperative bleeding requiring non-surgical intervention. NSAIDs did not significantly alter the number of perioperative bleeding events requiring non-surgical intervention: Peto OR 0.99 (95% CI 0.41 to 2.40) but the confidence intervals did not exclude an increased risk. Thirteen studies involving 1021 children reported postoperative vomiting. There was less vomiting when NSAIDs were used as part of the analgesic regime than when NSAIDs were not used: Mantel Haenszel (M-H) risk ratio (RR) 0.72 (95% CI 0.61 to 0.85).

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

There is insufficient evidence to exclude an increased risk of bleeding when NSAIDs are used in paediatric tonsillectomy. They do however confer the benefit of a reduction in vomiting.

Comparison of analgesic effect between gabapentin and diclofenac on post-operative pain in patients undergoing tonsillectomy

Background

Tonsillectomy is a common procedure causing considerable postoperative pain. Postoperative pain intensity of 60 - 70 in the scale of visual analog scale (VAS) has been reported up to 3 - 4 days which could continue until 11 days after the surgery.

Objectives

The current study aimed to compare the analgesic effect of gabapentin and diclofenac on pain after tonsillectomy with the control group.

Patients and Methods

In this double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial, 90 patients aged 10-25 years, ASA classes I and II were randomly selected to receive 20 mg/kg oral gabapentin (n = 30), 1.0 mg / kg rectal diclofenac (n = 30) or placebo (n = 30) preoperatively. Pain was evaluated postoperatively on a visual analogue scale at 2, 6, 12 and 24 h. Opioid consumption in the first 24 h after surgery and the side effects were also recorded.

Results

There was no significant difference in terms of age, sex, and time of surgery in the three groups. Patients in the gabapentin and diclofenac groups had significantly lower pain scores at all-time intervals than those in the placebo group. The total meperidine consumed in the gabapentin (14.16 ± 6.97 P = 0.001) and diclofenac (16.66 ± 8.95, P = 0.004) groups was significantly less than that of the placebo (33.4 ± 13.97) group. The frequency of side effects such as vomiting, dizziness, and headache was not significantly different among the groups.

Conclusions

It can be concluded that gabapentin and diclofenac reduced postoperative pain and opioid consumption without obvious side effects.

Does 1 or 2 g paracetamol added to ketoprofen enhance analgesia in adult tonsillectomy patients?

BACKGROUND

We have evaluated whether co-administration of intravenous (i.v.) paracetamol could enhance the analgesic efficacy of ketoprofen (a non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug or NSAID) in patients undergoing a tonsillectomy.

METHODS

This prospective, randomized, double-blinded and placebo-controlled add-on study with three parallel groups included 114 patients, aged 16-50 years, and scheduled for elective tonsillectomy. All patients were given ketoprofen 1 mg/kg i.v. after surgery, followed 5 min later by paracetamol 1 or 2 g i.v., or normal saline as a placebo. The primary outcome measure was the proportion of patients requiring oxycodone for rescue analgesia over the first 6 h (pain score >30/100 mm at rest or >50/100 mm during swallowing) after surgery.

RESULTS

No difference was detected in the proportion of patients receiving oxycodone (31/37 in the paracetamol 1 g group, 29/39 in the paracetamol 2 g group and 30/38 in the ketoprofen-alone group) between the three groups. However, significantly less doses of rescue analgesia were provided in the paracetamol groups than in the ketoprofen-alone group (P=0.005); among those who required rescue analgesia, 27% less oxycodone was required in the paracetamol 1 g group (80 doses, P=0.023) and 38% less in the paracetamol 2 g group (64 doses, P=0.002) than in the ketoprofen-alone group (106 doses).

CONCLUSION

Combining paracetamol i.v. with ketoprofen at the end of tonsillectomy did not reduce the proportion of the patients requiring rescue analgesia, but the number of opioid doses was less in the add-on groups.

Management of outpatient ear, nose and throat surgery

In the year under review there have been steady advances in anaesthesia. Premedication in children is best achieved with oral midazolam formulated in flavoured syrups, and the inhalational induction of anaesthesia may be accomplished using sevoflurane. Pain management of the most common surgical procedure performed in children, tonsillectomy/adenoidectomy, is still sub-optimal, but combinations of opioids and non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs are helpful. There are, however, some concerns regarding the possible increases in postoperative blood loss after tonsillectomy when non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs are used. Middle ear surgery leads to a high incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting, and these are best managed by utilizing a total intravenous anaesthetic technique with propofol, the avoidance of nitrous oxide, and administration of dexamethasone and a 5-hydroxytryptamine receptor antagonist such as ondansetron.

The effect of gabapentin on post-operative pain following tonsillectomy in adults

BACKGROUND

The aim of the present study was to investigate whether a combination of rofecoxib and gabapentin could improve pain relief and reduce opioid requirements, compared with rofecoxib alone, during the first 5 days after tonsillectomy.

METHODS

In a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study, 49 patients received gabapentin 1200 mg pre-operatively, followed by gabapentin 2 x 600 mg on the day of operation and gabapentin 3 x 600 mg for the next 5 days, or placebo. Both groups were given rofecoxib 50 mg daily. In the post-operative care unit, intravenous morphine was administered in doses of 2.5 mg on request. From 4 h to 5 days post-operatively, ketobemidone was offered as escape drug. Pain at rest and during swallowing, and side-effects, were assessed using a four-point verbal rating scale.

RESULTS

As a result of the global withdrawal of rofecoxib, the study had to be terminated prematurely. This report comprises the results from 22 patients in the gabapentin group and 27 patients in the placebo group. Gabapentin reduced ketobemidone requirements during the first 24 h post-operatively [4.5 mg (standard deviation, 3.0 mg) in the placebo group vs. 2.0 mg (standard deviation, 2.0 mg) in the gabapentin group; P < 0.003]. Gabapentin induced more dizziness (P < 0.002), gait disturbance (P < 0.02) and vomiting (P < 0.05) during days 0-5 than placebo. No other statistically significant differences were observed.

CONCLUSION

Gabapentin reduced opioid requirements in the first 24 h after tonsillectomy. The benefits of the reduced opioid intake may be overshadowed by the drawbacks of side-effects.

Preoperative administration of rofecoxib versus ketoprofen for pain relief after tonsillectomy

OBJECTIVES

We evaluated the analgesic efficacy and the opioid-sparing effect of oral rofecoxib compared with intramuscular (IM) ketoprofen in tonsillectomy.

METHODS

Seventy-seven adult patients were randomized into 2 groups: group R (n = 39), which received a single oral preoperative dose of rofecoxib 50 mg, and group K (n = 38), which received 2 IM doses of ketoprofen 100 mg (before surgery and after 12 hours). In both groups, additional IM meperidine hydrochloride 1 mg/kg was given. All patients received general anesthesia. A pain score (visual analog scale, 0 to 100) was assessed both at rest and during swallowing at 30 minutes and at 4, 8, 12, 16, and 24 hours after operation. If the pain score exceeded 40, patients were given meperidine as rescue analgesia.

RESULTS

The pain scores during rest and swallowing in group R were significantly lower (p < .05) than those of group K at 4, 8, and 12 hours after operation. Meperidine was given as rescue medication in significantly more patients of group K (76%) than of group R (38%; p < .05).

CONCLUSIONS

Oral premedication with rofecoxib seems to be more effective than use of ketoprofen in decreasing postoperative pain and the need for opioid rescue medication after elective tonsillectomy. Both drugs seem to be relatively safe as far as postoperative bleeding is concerned.

A randomized, placebo-controlled study of rofecoxib with paracetamol in early post-tonsillectomy pain in adults

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

Effective and early treatment of postoperative pain and nausea have become pivotal for the early discharge of patients after tonsillectomy. Opioid-based analgesia is standard practice but the use of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs is discouraged due to their platelet inhibiting properties. The cyclo-oxygenase-2 selective non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs are effective analgesics and do not affect platelet function. We hypothesized that premedication with cyclo-oxygenase-2 selective non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug in addition to paracetamol would provide effective analgesia and decrease opioid consumption during early recovery from tonsillectomy.

METHODS

In a randomized, placebo-controlled study of adult tonsillectomy patients (n=40) one group (R-group; n=20) was premedicated with paracetamol 1.5 g and rofecoxib 50 mg and a control group (P-group; n=20) was premedicated with paracetamol 1.5 g and placebo. Morphine was used as rescue medication. Postoperative (24 h) pain scores (0--10), morphine consumption as well as intraoperative blood loss were recorded.

RESULTS

We found no overall difference in pain scores between the groups but significantly more patients in the placebo group had pain scores >5 within the first 8 h. The rofecoxib group consumed less morphine during the first 12 h. A lower intraoperative blood loss was observed in the rofecoxib group.

CONCLUSION

Our results suggest an early although clinically minor analgesic benefit of the addition of a cyclo-oxygenase-2 selective non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug to paracetamol as premedication for adult tonsillectomy.

Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and perioperative bleeding in paediatric tonsillectomy

BACKGROUND

Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) are used for pain relief following tonsillectomy in children. However, as they inhibit platelet aggregation and prolong bleeding time, they could cause increased perioperative bleeding. The overall risk remains unclear.

OBJECTIVES

The primary objective of this review was to assess the effects of NSAIDs on bleeding for paediatric tonsillectomy. There is good evidence (Kokki 2003; Romsing 1997) to show that NSAIDs are effective analgesics in children. It was not the remit of our review to question this, but rather to assess the risk of bleeding when NSAIDs are used for pain relief following paediatric tonsillectomy.

SEARCH STRATEGY

We searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) (The Cochrane Library, Issue 3, 2004); MEDLINE (inception until August 2004); EMBASE (from inception until August 2004), Current Problems (produced by the UK Medicines Control Agency); MedWatch (produced by the US Food and Drug Administration) and the Australian Adverse Drug Reactions Bulletin in December 2001. The Cochrane Anaesthesia Review Group's handsearch co-ordinator performed handsearching as required. We also contacted manufacturers and researchers in the field.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We included randomized controlled trials assessing NSAIDs in children up to and including 16 years of age, undergoing elective tonsillectomy or adenotonsillectomy.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two authors independently assessed trial quality and extracted the data. We contacted study authors where necessary for additional information. We also collected information on adverse effects from the trials.

MAIN RESULTS

We included 13 trials involving 955 children. All included trials compared NSAIDs with other analgesics or placebo and looked at bleeding requiring surgical intervention. NSAIDs did not significantly alter number of perioperative bleeding events requiring surgical intervention; Peto odds ratio 1.46 (95% confidence interval 0.49 to 4.40). Seven trials involving 471 children looked at bleeding not requiring surgical intervention. NSAIDs did not significantly alter number of perioperative bleeding events not requiring surgical intervention; Peto odds ratio 1.23 (95% confidence interval 0.44 to 3.43). Ten trials involving 837 children looked at post-operative nausea and vomiting. There was less nausea and vomiting when NSAIDs were used as part of the analgesic regime, compared to when NSAIDs were not used; Odds ratio 0.40 (95% confidence interval 0.23 to 0.72).

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

NSAIDs did not cause any increase in bleeding requiring a return to theatre. There was significantly less nausea and vomiting when NSAIDs were used compared to alternative analgesics.

Celecoxib and ketoprofen for pain management during tonsillectomy: a placebo-controlled clinical trial

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the efficacy and safety of celecoxib and ketoprofen in pain management during tonsillectomy in 120 patients.

STUDY DESIGN AND SETTING

The study was randomized, double-blind, and placebo-controlled with parallel groups. Sixty minutes before anesthesia induction and 12 hours after, the patients received a 200-mg celecoxib, a 100-mg ketoprofen, or a placebo capsule. After discharge, patients were prescribed either celecoxib or ketoprofen capsules to be taken every 12 hours.

RESULTS

During the first 24 hours, the need for rescue analgesic was less in the ketoprofen-group (5 [1-9]) doses (median [range]) than in the placebo-group (6 [1-13]) ( P = 0.021), but similar to the celecoxib-group (5 [2-14]). After discharge, the cessation of pain during eating occurred earlier in the celecoxib-treated patients, after 10 (1-17) days, than in the ketoprofen-treated patients, after 12 (1-21) days, ( P = 0.008). One celecoxib-treated patient and 6 ketoprofen-treated patients ( P = 0.013) needed electrocautery to stop postoperative bleeding.

CONCLUSION

Ketoprofen provided a better initial analgesic efficacy but after discharge the recovery with celecoxib was faster and the incidence of secondary hemorrhages was lower.

SIGNIFICANCE

Celecoxib seems to be more effective and safe than ketoprofen for pain management after discharge in patients with tonsillectomy.

Ketamine does not decrease postoperative pain after remifentanil-based anaesthesia for tonsillectomy in adults

BACKGROUND

There are conflicting results concerning the pre-emptive effect of ketamine on central sensitization following surgery. The aim of this prospective, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study was to assess the effect of the N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor antagonist ketamine on postoperative morphine consumption and pain score after remifentanil-based anaesthesia in adult patients scheduled for tonsillectomy.

METHODS

We studied 40 adult patients undergoing elective tonsillectomy. Total intravenous anaesthesia was induced and maintained with remifentanil (0.125-1.0 microg kg(-1) min(-1)) and propofol target-controlled infusion. Patients in group K received a bolus dose of ketamine 0.5 mg kg(-1) immediately after anaesthetic induction, followed by a continuous infusion of 2 microg kg(-1) min(-1). Saline was administered in the same sequence in group S. Propofol, remifentanil, and the study drug infusions were discontinued at the end of surgery.

RESULTS

Intraoperative remifentanil consumption (0.57 +/- 0.18 in group K vs. 0.55 +/- 0.14 microg kg(-1) min(-1) in group S), morphine requirement in the PACU (11 +/- 3 in group K vs. 9 +/- 4 mg in group S) and in the ward (22 +/- 11 in group K vs. 25 +/- 14 mg in group S), median time to first analgesia in the ward (338 +/- 126 in group K vs. 328 +/- 144 min in group S), and VAS pain scores were comparable in both groups.

CONCLUSION

Small-dose of ketamine does not seem to be a useful adjunct to remifentanil-based anaesthesia during short, painful surgical procedures.

What is the role of NSAIDs in pre-emptive analgesia?

NSAIDs inhibit the cyclo-oxygenase enzymes, and decrease peripheral and central prostaglandin production. In addition to reducing the inflammation that accompanies tissue injury, decreasing prostaglandin production attenuates the response of the peripheral and central components of the nervous system to noxious stimuli. Such a reduction in the response to pain can reduce the peripheral and central sensitisation induced by noxious stimuli, and reduce the pain experienced in response to subsequent noxious stimuli. These properties would seem to make NSAIDs ideal drugs to use in a pre-emptive fashion, where analgesics are administered prior to a noxious stimulus, such as surgery, with the expectation that reduction in peripheral and central sensitisation will lead to a decrease of pain.However, the available perioperative trials of pre-emptive NSAID use have yielded modest or equivocal results, and these may be due, in part, to controversy associated with the definition of pre-emptive analgesia and how to conduct the corresponding clinical trials. Although NSAIDs may have a limited ability by themselves to induce a pre-emptive analgesic effect, the available trials suggest how the perioperative use of these drugs may be made more effective. It is expected that NSAIDs will play an increasing role in multimodal analgesia and pain relief in general.

Nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs and the risk of operative site bleeding after tonsillectomy: a quantitative systematic review

The use of nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) for analgesia after tonsillectomy is controversial because NSAIDS, through platelet inhibition, may increase the risk of perioperative bleeding. We systematically searched for randomized, controlled trials that reported on the incidence of perioperative bleeding attributable to the use of NSAIDs in patients undergoing tonsillectomy. As secondary outcome measures, we analyzed the quality of pain relief and the incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting. Twenty-five studies with data from 970 patients receiving a NSAID and 883 receiving a non-NSAID treatment or a placebo were analyzed. Data were combined using a fixed-effect model. Of four bleeding end points (intraoperative blood loss, postoperative bleeding, hospital admission, and reoperation because of bleeding), only reoperation happened significantly more often with NSAIDs: Peto-odds ratio, 2.33 (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.12-4.83) and number-needed-to-treat, 60 (95% CI, 34-277). Compared with opioids, NSAIDs were equianalgesic, and the risk of emesis was significantly decreased (relative risk, 0.73; 95% CI, 0.63-0.85; numbers-needed-to-treat, 9; 95% CI, 5-19).

IMPLICATIONS

The evidence for nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs to increase the risk of bleeding after tonsillectomy is equivocal, and the risk-benefit ratio is not straightforward. There is some evidence for an increased likelihood of reoperation because of bleeding. The agenda must be one of further research rather than of clinical recommendations.

Current status of pre-emptive analgesia

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The controversy over preemptive analgesia continues unabated, with studies both supporting and refuting its efficacy. The timing of an analgesic intervention and presence of a placebo control may have significant impact on the interpretation of results and may have led to the premature conclusion that preemptive analgesia is of limited clinical utility. A review of the recent literature using strict definitions of preemptive and preventive analgesia is required in order to clarify the broader issue of the benefits of perioperative analgesia.

RECENT FINDINGS

A total of 27 studies, published from April 2001 to April 2002, were found to evaluate preemptive (n = 12) or preventive analgesia (n = 15). Evidence for a benefit of preventive analgesia was strong, with 60% of studies finding reduced pain or analgesic consumption beyond the clinical duration of action of the analgesic intervention. Evidence for a benefit of preemptive analgesia was equivocal, with 41.7% of studies demonstrating that preincisional treatment reduces pain or analgesic consumption to a greater extent than does postincisional treatment.

SUMMARY

Studies that used a preventive design had a greater likelihood of finding a beneficial effect. The application of preventive perioperative analgesia (not necessarily preincisional) is associated with a significant reduction in pain beyond the clinical duration of action of the analgesic agent, in particular for the N-methyl-D-aspartate antagonists. The classical definition of preemptive analgesia should be abandoned in favor of preventive analgesia. This will broaden the scope of inquiry from a narrow focus on preincisional versus postincisional interventions to one that aims to minimize postoperative pain and analgesic requirements by reducing peripheral and central sensitization arising from noxious preoperative, intraoperative and postoperative inputs.

Comparison of pre- and postoperative administration of ketoprofen for analgesia after tonsillectomy in children

BACKGROUND

Tonsillectomy is commonly performed in children, but unfortunately it is associated with intense postoperative pain. The use and optimal timing of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (e.g. ketoprofen) during tonsillectomy is controversial.

METHODS

We evaluated the safety and efficacy of ketoprofen in 109 children, aged 3-16 years, during and after tonsillectomy in 1998-2000. Standardized anaesthesia was used. Forty-seven children received ketoprofen 0.5 mg.kg-1 at induction (preketoprofen group) and 42 children after surgery (postketoprofen group), followed by continuous ketoprofen infusion of 3 mg.kg-1 over 24 h in both groups; 20 children received normal saline (placebo group). Oxycodone was used for rescue analgesia.

RESULTS

Pre- and postketoprofen groups did not differ in experienced pain or in opioid consumption in the first 24 h after surgery; demonstrating that ketoprofen did not have a pre-emptive effect. Patients in the placebo group received 30 more oxycodone doses than did patients in the ketoprofen groups, but the difference was not significant (P=0.074). Two patients (5) in the postketoprofen group had postoperative bleeding at 4 h and 26 h, respectively. Both patients required electrocautery to stop bleeding. Neither the incidence nor the severity of adverse events differed between study groups.

CONCLUSIONS

This study demonstrates that ketoprofen did not have a preemptive effect and, at the dose used, did not perform statistically significantly better than placebo.

Recovery after tonsillectomy in adults: a three-week follow-up study

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate recovery after tonsillectomy and safety and efficacy of ketoprofen in pain treatment after discharge.

STUDY DESIGN

A prospective, longitudinal study of 102 patients undergoing tonsillectomy.

METHODS

All patients underwent tonsillectomy (or adenotonsillectomy) under general anesthesia. In the hospital, 77 patients received a bolus of 0.5 mg/kg ketoprofen intravenously, followed by a 3-mg/kg continuous infusion over 24 hours, and oxycodone for rescue analgesia. Twenty-five patients received normal saline and oxycodone. At discharge, all patients were prescribed ketoprofen capsules at a dose of 3 to 5 mg/kg per day for postoperative pain control at home, with paracetamol-codeine tablets for rescue analgesia. At home, the patients recorded pain and analgesic consumption each day for the first week after surgery. At 3 weeks, patients recorded the total analgesic requirement, duration of pain, all adverse events during recovery, and return to normal daily activities.

RESULTS

No pre-emptive effect of ketoprofen was noticed because there was no significant difference in recovery after discharge between patients who had received ketoprofen or placebo during the first 24 hours after surgery. In the whole study group, the median of pain cessation was 11 days (range, 3-24 days) and the median of analgesic treatment was 12 days (range, 5-25 days). More than 50% of the patients needed 1 to 3 rescue analgesic doses daily during the first week after tonsillectomy. A return back to normal daily activities took place after 12 days (range, 2-24 days). Nine patients needed electrocautery to stop postoperative bleeding. No other serious adverse events occurred.

CONCLUSIONS

The main problem after tonsillectomy is significant pain that can last 11 to 12 days after surgery. Ketoprofen combined with paracetamol-codeine provided sufficient analgesia for most patients at home, but because ketoprofen may cause an increase in the secondary hemorrhage rate, it should be prescribed with caution.