1
|
Salman FT, DiCristina C, Chain A, Afzal AS. Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of aprepitant for the prevention of postoperative nausea and vomiting in pediatric subjects. J Pediatr Surg 2019; 54:1384-1390. [PMID: 30381138 DOI: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2018.09.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/29/2018] [Revised: 08/06/2018] [Accepted: 09/07/2018] [Indexed: 10/28/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND/PURPOSE This multicenter, randomized, partially-blinded phase IIb study evaluated the pharmacokinetics (PK)/pharmacodynamics, safety, and tolerability of aprepitant in pediatric subjects for the prevention of postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV). METHODS Subjects aged birth to 17 years scheduled to undergo surgery and receive general anesthesia with ≥1 risk factor for PONV were randomly assigned to 1 of 3 aprepitant dose regimens (a single oral dose of aprepitant equivalent to adult doses of 10 mg, 40 mg, or 125 mg), or a control regimen of ondansetron before anesthesia. Assessments included PK, safety, and exploratory efficacy (complete response [CR; no emesis, retching, or dry heaves and no rescue therapy within 0-24 h following surgery] and no vomiting [NV; no emesis, retching, or dry heaves within 0-24 h following surgery]). RESULTS Of 220 randomized and treated subjects, 119 receiving a single aprepitant dose were sampled for PK analysis and had evaluable aprepitant plasma concentrations. A dose-dependent relationship in exposure (AUC0-8 h and Cmax) was observed. Aprepitant was generally well tolerated, and the CR and NV rates were high (>80%) across treatment groups. CONCLUSIONS PK, safety, and preliminary efficacy analyses support further clinical evaluation of aprepitant for PONV prophylaxis in pediatric patients. CLINICALTRIALS. GOV ID NCT01732458 LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic, Level I.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- F Tansu Salman
- Department of Pediatric Surgery, Istanbul Medical Faculty, Istanbul University, Capa, 34452 Fatih/Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Cara DiCristina
- Merck & Co., Inc., 2000 Galloping Hill Road, Kenilworth, NJ 07033, USA
| | - Anne Chain
- Merck & Co., Inc., 2000 Galloping Hill Road, Kenilworth, NJ 07033, USA
| | - Amna Sadaf Afzal
- Merck & Co., Inc., 2000 Galloping Hill Road, Kenilworth, NJ 07033, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Bourdaud N, François C, Jacqmarcq O, Guye ML, Jean J, Studer C, Engrand-Donal C, Devys JM, Boutin F, Guyot E, Bouazza N, Treluyer JM, Orliaguet GA. Addition of droperidol to prophylactic ondansetron and dexamethasone in children at high risk for postoperative vomiting. A randomized, controlled, double-blind study. Br J Anaesth 2018; 118:918-923. [PMID: 28505233 DOI: 10.1093/bja/aex099] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 03/22/2017] [Indexed: 11/14/2022] Open
Abstract
Background : The combination of dexamethasone (DEX), ondansetron (OND) and droperidol (DRO) is efficacious in preventing postoperative nausea and vomiting in adults, but has not been well assessed in children. Methods : Children undergoing elective surgery under general anaesthesia and considered at high risk for postoperative vomiting (POV) were randomly assigned to receive a combination of DEX, OND and placebo (Group A) or a combination of DEX, OND and DRO (Group B). The primary outcome was the incidence of POV during the first 24 hours after surgery. We hypothesized that the addition of DRO to the standard antiemetic prophylaxis would provide a further 15% reduction in the residual risk for POV. The secondary outcome considered was any adverse event occurring during the study. Results : One hundred and fifty-three children, aged three to 16 years, were randomized to Group A and 162 to Group B. The overall incidence of POV did not differ significantly between the two groups, with 16 patients in Group A (10.5%) and 18 in Group B (11.1%) presenting with one or more episodes of POV, P =0.86. Fewer patients presented with adverse events in Group A (2%) compared with Group B (8%), P =0.01. Drowsiness and headache were the principal adverse events reported. Conclusions : The addition of DRO to a combination of OND and DEX did not decrease POV frequency below that obtained with the two-drug combination in children at high risk of POV, but increased the risk of drowsiness. The combination of DEX and OND should be recommended in children with a high risk of POV. Clinical trial registration. NCT01739985.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- N Bourdaud
- Service d'Anesthésie Réanimation, Hôpital Universitaire Necker, Université Paris Descartes Sorbonne Paris Cité, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Paris, France
| | - C François
- Service d'Anesthésie Réanimation, Hôpital Universitaire Necker, Université Paris Descartes Sorbonne Paris Cité, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Paris, France
| | - O Jacqmarcq
- Service d'Anesthésie et de Réanimation Chirurgicale, Hôtel Dieu, CHU, 44093 Nantes, France
| | - M-L Guye
- Service d'Anesthésie et de Réanimation, Hôpital Armand Trousseau, APHP, Université Pierre et Marie Curie, Paris, France
| | - J Jean
- Département d'Anesthésie et de Réanimation, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire, Rouen, France
| | - C Studer
- Département d'Anesthésie et de Réanimation, Centre Hospitalier Régional Universitaire, Besançon, France
| | - C Engrand-Donal
- Département d'Anesthésie et de Réanimation, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire, Rennes, France
| | - J-M Devys
- Département d'Anesthésie et de Réanimation, Fondation Ophtalmologique Adolphe de Rothschild, Paris, France
| | - F Boutin
- Département d'Anesthésie et de Réanimation, Centre François Xavier Michelet, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire, Bordeaux, France
| | - E Guyot
- Département d'Anesthésie et de Réanimation, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire, Reims, France
| | - N Bouazza
- Unité de recherche Clinique, Hôpital Universitaire Necker-Enfants Malades, APHP, Université Paris Descartes, Paris, France
| | - J-M Treluyer
- Unité de recherche Clinique, Hôpital Universitaire Necker-Enfants Malades, APHP, Université Paris Descartes, Paris, France
| | - G A Orliaguet
- Service d'Anesthésie Réanimation, Hôpital Universitaire Necker, Université Paris Descartes Sorbonne Paris Cité, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Paris, France.,Unité de recherche Clinique, Hôpital Universitaire Necker-Enfants Malades, APHP, Université Paris Descartes, Paris, France
| | | |
Collapse
|
3
|
Kume K, Kasuya Y, Ozaki M. Effect of Goreisan, a traditional Japanese Kampo medicine, on postoperative nausea and vomiting in gynecological patients. JA Clin Rep 2018; 3:52. [PMID: 29457096 PMCID: PMC5804648 DOI: 10.1186/s40981-017-0122-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/28/2017] [Accepted: 09/22/2017] [Indexed: 01/25/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Goreisan, a traditional Japanese Kampo medicine, may prevent postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV). The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect of Goreisan on PONV in a high-risk population in a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled manner. Findings Patients undergoing gynecological surgery were randomly allocated to the Goreisan and the control groups. General anesthesia was induced with propofol and remifentanil. After endotracheal intubation, anesthesia was maintained with sevoflurane, fentanyl, and remifentanil. Goreisan 7.5 g dissolved in water (Goreisan group) or water (control group) in a volume of 20 ml was administered through a nasogastric tube approximately 1 h before completion of surgery. The primary outcome of this study was the incidence of PONV during the first 2 h after extubation. In the interim analysis, it was apparent that Goreisan has no effect. Therefore, we discontinued recruiting patients and present results based on data from 83 patients. The incidence of PONV during the first 2 h after extubation was 45% in the Goreisan group (n = 40) and 46.5% in the control group (n = 43) (p = 0.89). There was no significant difference in PONV incidence or severity during the first 24 h post-extubation. Conclusion Goreisan has little potency in preventing PONV in high-risk patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Keiko Kume
- Department of Anesthesiology, Tokyo Women's Medical University, 8-1, Kawada-cho, Shinjuku-ku, Tokyo, 162-8666 Japan
| | - Yusuke Kasuya
- Department of Anesthesiology, Tokyo Women's Medical University, 8-1, Kawada-cho, Shinjuku-ku, Tokyo, 162-8666 Japan
| | - Makoto Ozaki
- Department of Anesthesiology, Tokyo Women's Medical University, 8-1, Kawada-cho, Shinjuku-ku, Tokyo, 162-8666 Japan
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Lau Moon Lin M, Robinson PD, Flank J, Sung L, Dupuis LL. The Safety of Metoclopramide in Children: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Drug Saf 2017; 39:675-87. [PMID: 27003816 DOI: 10.1007/s40264-016-0418-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/22/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Metoclopramide is recommended for adults with breakthrough or refractory chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV) and for CINV prophylaxis in children. The drug regulatory agencies of Canada and the EU have revised the labelling of metoclopramide to contraindicate its use in children aged <1 year and to caution against its use in children aged <5 years and its duration of use beyond 5 days. OBJECTIVE This review describes the safety of metoclopramide in children when given for any indication. METHODS We conducted electronic searches in MEDLINE and Embase as of 9 March 2015. All studies in English reporting adverse effects associated with the use of metoclopramide in children (aged ≤18 years) were included. Adverse effects that had a cumulative incidence of at least 1 % and were reported in prospective studies were synthesized. RESULTS A total of 108 (57 prospective) studies involving 2699 patients (2745 metoclopramide courses) were included. The most common adverse effects reported in prospective studies of metoclopramide in children were extrapyramidal symptoms (EPS; 9 %, 95 % confidence interval [CI] 5-17), diarrhea (6 %, 95 % CI 4-9), and sedation (multiple-dose studies: 6 %, 95 % CI 3-12). Dysrhythmia, respiratory distress/arrest, neuroleptic malignant syndrome, and tardive dyskinesia were rarely associated with metoclopramide use. LIMITATIONS The definitions of adverse effects reported in the included studies were heterogeneous, and the risk of bias in most studies was moderate. CONCLUSIONS The most commonly reported adverse effects associated with the use of metoclopramide in children-EPS, diarrhea, and sedation-were reversible and of no long-term significance. Adverse effects that were life threatening or slow to resolve were rarely associated with its use in children.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Paula D Robinson
- Pediatric Oncology Group of Ontario, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Jacqueline Flank
- Leslie Dan Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.,Department of Pharmacy, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Lillian Sung
- Department of Paediatrics, Division of Haematology/Oncology, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, ON, Canada.,Research Institute, The Hospital for Sick Children, 555 University Ave, Toronto, ON, M5G 1X8, Canada
| | - L Lee Dupuis
- Leslie Dan Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada. .,Department of Pharmacy, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, ON, Canada. .,Research Institute, The Hospital for Sick Children, 555 University Ave, Toronto, ON, M5G 1X8, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW Postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) has a high incidence in children and requires prophylactic and therapeutic strategies. RECENT FINDINGS PONV can be reduced by the avoidance of nitrous oxide, volatile anesthetics, and the reduction of postoperative opioids. The use of dexamethasone, 5-HT3 antagonists, or droperidol alone is potent, but combinations are even more effective to reduce PONV. Droperidol has a Food and Drug Administration warning. Hence, dexamethasone and 5-HT3 antagonists should be preferred as prophylactic drugs. It is further reasonable to adapt PONV prophylaxis to different risk levels. Prolonged surgery time, inpatients, types of surgery (e.g. strabismus and ear-nose-throat surgery), and patients with PONV in history should be treated as high risk, whereas short procedures and outpatients are to be treated as low risk. SUMMARY Concluding from the existing guidelines and data on the handling of PONV in children at least 3 years, the following recommendations are given: outpatients undergoing small procedures should receive a single prophylaxis, outpatients at high risk a double prophylaxis, inpatients with surgery time of more than 30 min and use of postoperative opioids should get double prophylaxis, and inpatients receiving a high-risk surgical procedure or with other risk factors a triple prophylaxis (two drugs and total intravenous anesthesia). Dimenhydrinate can be used as a second choice, whereas droperidol and metoclopramide can only be recommended as rescue therapy.
Collapse
|
6
|
Abstract
The present guidelines are the most recent data on postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) and an update on the 2 previous sets of guidelines published in 2003 and 2007. These guidelines were compiled by a multidisciplinary international panel of individuals with interest and expertise in PONV under the auspices of the Society for Ambulatory Anesthesia. The panel members critically and systematically evaluated the current medical literature on PONV to provide an evidence-based reference tool for the management of adults and children who are undergoing surgery and are at increased risk for PONV. These guidelines identify patients at risk for PONV in adults and children; recommend approaches for reducing baseline risks for PONV; identify the most effective antiemetic single therapy and combination therapy regimens for PONV prophylaxis, including nonpharmacologic approaches; recommend strategies for treatment of PONV when it occurs; provide an algorithm for the management of individuals at increased risk for PONV as well as steps to ensure PONV prevention and treatment are implemented in the clinical setting.
Collapse
|
7
|
Contopoulos-Ioannidis DG, Seto I, Hamm MP, Thomson D, Hartling L, Ioannidis JPA, Curtis S, Constantin E, Batmanabane G, Klassen T, Williams K. Empirical evaluation of age groups and age-subgroup analyses in pediatric randomized trials and pediatric meta-analyses. Pediatrics 2012; 129 Suppl 3:S161-84. [PMID: 22661763 DOI: 10.1542/peds.2012-0055j] [Citation(s) in RCA: 28] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/24/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND An important step toward improvement of the conduct of pediatric clinical research is the standardization of the ages of children to be included in pediatric trials and the optimal age-subgroups to be analyzed. METHODS We set out to evaluate empirically the age ranges of children, and age-subgroup analyses thereof, reported in recent pediatric randomized clinical trials (RCTs) and meta-analyses. First, we screened 24 RCTs published in Pediatrics during the first 6 months of 2011; second, we screened 188 pediatric RCTs published in 2007 in the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials; third, we screened 48 pediatric meta-analyses published in the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews in 2011. We extracted information on age ranges and age-subgroups considered and age-subgroup differences reported. RESULTS The age range of children in RCTs published in Pediatrics varied from 0.1 to 17.5 years (median age: 5; interquartile range: 1.8-10.2) and only 25% of those presented age-subgroup analyses. Large variability was also detected for age ranges in 188 RCTs from the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and only 28 of those analyzed age-subgroups. Moreover, only 11 of 48 meta-analyses had age-subgroup analyses, and in 6 of those, only different studies were included. Furthermore, most of these observed differences were not beyond chance. CONCLUSIONS We observed large variability in the age ranges and age-subgroups of children included in recent pediatric trials and meta-analyses. Despite the limited available data, some age-subgroup differences were noted. The rationale for the selection of particular age-subgroups deserves further study.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Despina G Contopoulos-Ioannidis
- Department of Pediatrics, Division of Infectious Diseases, Stanford Prevention Research Center, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California 94305, USA.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
8
|
Comparison of ondansetron and metoclopramide antiemetic prophylaxis in maxillofacial surgery patients. ACTA ACUST UNITED AC 2011; 111:275-7. [DOI: 10.1016/j.tripleo.2010.04.034] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/07/2010] [Revised: 04/11/2010] [Accepted: 04/22/2010] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
|
9
|
Le TP, Gan TJ. Update on the management of postoperative nausea and vomiting and postdischarge nausea and vomiting in ambulatory surgery. Anesthesiol Clin 2010; 28:225-249. [PMID: 20488392 DOI: 10.1016/j.anclin.2010.02.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 61] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/29/2023]
Abstract
Postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) continues to be one of the most common complaints following surgery, occurring in more than 30% of surgeries, or as high as 70% to 80% in certain high-risk populations without prophylaxis. The 5-hydroxytryptamine type 3 (5-HT(3)) receptor antagonists continue to be the mainstay of antiemetic therapy, but newer approaches, such as neurokinin-1 antagonists, a longer-acting serotonin receptor antagonist, multimodal management, and novel techniques for managing high-risk patients are gaining prominence. The related problem of postdischarge nausea and vomiting (PDNV) has received increasing attention from health care providers. The issues of PONV and PDNV are especially significant in the context of ambulatory surgeries, which comprise more than 60% of the combined 56.4 million ambulatory and inpatient surgery visits in the United States. Because of the relatively brief period that ambulatory patients spend in health care facilities, it is particularly important to prevent and treat PONV and PDNV swiftly and effectively.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tina P Le
- Department of Anesthesiology, Duke University Medical Center, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC 27710, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
10
|
Schwengel DA, Sterni LM, Tunkel DE, Heitmiller ES. Perioperative management of children with obstructive sleep apnea. Anesth Analg 2009; 109:60-75. [PMID: 19535696 DOI: 10.1213/ane.0b013e3181a19e21] [Citation(s) in RCA: 93] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/31/2022]
Abstract
Obstructive sleep apnea syndrome (OSA) affects 1%-3% of children. Children with OSA can present for all types of surgical and diagnostic procedures requiring anesthesia, with adenotonsillectomy being the most common surgical treatment for OSA in the pediatric age group. Thus, it is imperative that the anesthesiologist be familiar with the potential anesthetic complications and immediate postoperative problems associated with OSA. The significant implications that the presence of OSA imposes on perioperative care have been recognized by national medical professional societies. The American Academy of Pediatrics published a clinical practice guideline for pediatric OSA in 2002, and cited an increased risk of anesthetic complications, though specific anesthetic issues were not addressed. In 2006, the American Society of Anesthesiologists published a practice guideline for perioperative management of patients with OSA that noted the pediatric-related risk factor of obesity, and the increased perioperative risk associated with adenotonsillectomy in children younger than 3 yr. However, management of OSA in children younger than 1 yr-of-age was excluded from the guideline, as were other issues related specifically to the pediatric patient. Hence, many questions remain regarding the perioperative care of the child with OSA. In this review, we examine the literature on pediatric OSA, discuss its pathophysiology, current treatment options, and recognized approaches to perioperative management of these young and potentially high-risk patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Deborah A Schwengel
- Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Department of Anesthesiology/Critical Care Medicine, 600 North Wolfe St., Blalock 1412, Baltimore, MD 21287-8711, USA.
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|