Safety of Inguinal Hernia Repair in the Elderly with Perioperative Continuation of Antithrombotic Therapy

Introduction

This study aimed to evaluate the safety of an inguinal hernia repair (IHR) under local anesthesia (LA) in the elderly with a perioperative continuation of antithrombotic therapy (AT).

Methods

A total of 120 patients undergoing elective primary IHR between August 2018 and August 2019 at the West China Hospital of China were prospectively studied, among which 60 patients also had coexisting cardiovascular diseases and had a continuation of AT perioperatively (antithrombotic group); the other 60 patients were not on any prior AT (control group). The primary endpoints were intra- and postoperative hemorrhagic complications, the required interventions for complications based on the Clavien-Dindo classification, and postoperative thromboembolic complications. The secondary endpoints were nonhemorrhagic complications, intraoperative duration, and postoperative length of stay (LOS).

Results

None of the patients in both groups had significant intraoperative bleeding >10 mL, and there were no significant differences between the 2 groups in terms of the postoperative hemorrhagic complications: bruising (2 vs. 0%, p = 1.000), serosanguinous soakage (7 vs. 3%, p = 0.679), and no hematoma was observed. Interventions required for encountered complications based on the Clavien-Dindo classification grade I (7 vs. 5%, p = 1.000) were assessed. There were no episodes of postoperative thromboembolic complications within 60 days in both groups. There were also no significant differences between the 2 groups in terms of nonhemorrhagic complications, intraoperative duration, and postoperative LOS (p > 0.05 in all).

Conclusions

The perioperative continuation of AT did not increase the risk of intra- and postoperative hemorrhagic complications following IHR in the elderly. Thus, IHR under LA seems to be safe and feasible in this setting.

Risk of perioperative coronary stent stenosis or occlusion in patients with previous percutaneous coronary intervention undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting surgery

OBJECTIVES

There is an ongoing discussion about how to treat coronary stents during bypass surgery: Should patent stents be left alone and the stented vessels be ungrafted, or should every stented coronary artery receive a bypass graft? This study aims to determine the relevance of perioperative stent stenosis or occlusion on postoperative outcomes up to 3 years postoperatively.

METHODS

Patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting surgery (CABG) (±concomitant procedures) with previous percutaneous coronary intervention from 4 centres were prospectively included in this observatory study between April 2015 and June 2017. A coronary angiography was conducted between the fifth and seventh postoperative days. The preoperative and postoperative angiograms were assessed in a core laboratory, assessing the patencies of coronary stents and bypass grafts. The core lab investigators were blinded to the patients' characteristics and perioperative course.

RESULTS

A total of 107 patients were included in the study. In the postoperative coronary angiography, 265 bypass grafts and 189 coronary stents were examined angiographically. Ninety-seven percent of preoperatively patent stents remained patent. New coronary stent stenoses were observed in 5 patients (4.7%). All 5 patients were asymptomatic and managed conservatively. Bypass stenoses were observed in 12 patients (11%), of whom were managed conservatively, 4 underwent percutaneous coronary intervention and 1 underwent redo-CABG. Two years postoperatively, 97% of patients were alive. Patients with new stent stenosis tended to have a better survival compared with patients with bypass stenosis (100% vs 73%; P = 0.09) up to 3 years postoperatively.

CONCLUSIONS

Perioperative coronary stent stenosis occurs rarely. It is safe to leave a patently stented coronary vessel without bypass grafting.

Risk of non-cardiac surgery after percutaneous coronary intervention with drug-eluting stents

Elective non-cardiac surgery (NCS) should optimally be delayed one year after implantation of a drug-eluting stent (DES). Dual antiplatelet therapy or at least aspirin is recommended to be continued considering the relative risk of stent thrombosis especially during the 4 weeks after DES implantation. However, these recommendations were supported by insufficient evidence. We investigated predictors for postoperative major adverse cardiovascular and cerebral event (MACCE) in 1582 patients undergoing non-cardiac surgery after DES implantation. 96 patients (6.1%) developed postoperative MACCE. In the propensity score-matched analysis, aspirin maintenance was not associated with MACCE (odds ratio [OR] 0.78, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.48-1.27, P = 0.320) and was associated with increased risk of major bleeding (OR 1.84, 95% CI 1.02-3.32, P = 0.044). When patients who underwent NCS within one month after DES implantation were matched with those who underwent NCS thereafter, the risk of MACCE was higher when surgery was done within 30 days after PCI (OR 2.21, 95% CI 1.05-4.66, P = 0.036). Maintenance of aspirin did not decrease MACCE after NCS in patients with DES and only increased the risk of major bleeding. NCS within one month after DES implantation was associated with higher incidence of MACCE. However, prospective trials are required to validate our results.

Management of antiplatelet therapy in patients with coronary stents undergoing noncardiac surgery: association with adverse events

BACKGROUND

Perioperative discontinuation of antiplatelet therapy (APT) in patients with coronary stents has been associated with major adverse cardiac events. Our aim was to analyse the perioperative management of APT in such patients and its relationship to the incidence of major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (MACCE) and major bleeding events (MBE) in noncardiac surgery.

METHODS

We completed a prospective multicentre observational study of patients with coronary stents undergoing noncardiac surgery in 11 hospitals in Spain. The main objectives were to record perioperative events and prospectively analyse the management of APT, and to assess whether the different preoperative APT regimens were associated with MACCE and MBE.

RESULTS

Of 432 surgical procedures studied, 15% experienced a perioperative MACCE and 37% a MBE. Overall mortality was 3.0%. Presurgical APT was prescribed in 95% of procedures, and was preoperatively discontinued in 15%. Surgery was urgent or emergent in 22% of patients, 31% were ASA IV, and 38% had a Revised Cardiac Risk Index of IV. MACCE were related to recent myocardial infarction (P=0.038), chronic kidney disease (P<0.001), insulin-dependent diabetes (P=0.006) and no preoperative APT (P=0.018). MBE also increased MACCE risk (P<0.001). We found statin therapy (P=0.049) and obesity (P=0.016) to be protective factors for MACCE.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with coronary stents undergoing noncardiac surgery suffer a high incidence of perioperative adverse events, even with perioperative APT. Major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events are mainly related to previous medical conditions and perioperative major bleeingn events. Our findings should be treated with caution when applied to an elective surgery population.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION

NCT01171612.

Contemporary outcomes in vascular patients who require preoperative coronary stent

BACKGROUND

The documented risks of preoperative coronary revascularization prior to vascular surgery have led to a marked reduction in the role of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) during preoperative risk stratification. However, many patients with peripheral arterial disease are first identified immediately after a PCI for an acute coronary syndrome. We sought to determine the risks associated with these patients who then go on to have a peripheral arterial intervention (open operation or endovascular procedure). We hypothesized that there was no difference in outcomes in patients whose medical condition required PCI with coronary stent placement prior to a vascular operation compared with a control cohort of nonstented patients who underwent a vascular operation alone. We report the vascular operative outcomes in a contemporary cohort of vascular patients who had PCI with coronary stent placement for an acute event.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective cohort analysis, utilizing administrative data, of 3,678 vascular patients from 2005 to 2010 at a tertiary care hospital. Two groups were defined: patients with preoperative PCI and coronary stent placement within 1 year prior to vascular operation (N = 101, mean age 66 ± 1.22 years, 51.5% men); and patients with no PCI prior to vascular operation (N = 3,577, mean age 60 ± 0.27 years, 46.37% men). Cardiovascular risk factors and complications derived from ICD-9 codes were used to parse data after open peripheral vascular surgery, endovascular repair, or amputation. Primary outcomes were death, nonfatal myocardial infarction, major adverse cardiac event (MACE, defined as death, myocardial infarction, or subsequent coronary revascularization) or bleeding.

RESULTS

Univariate analysis showed significant differences in both demographic and outcome analysis in patients with and without prior coronary stent. Patients with a recent PCI followed by a vascular procedure were more likely to undergo an endovascular procedure (75.3% vs. 64.5%, odds ratio = 1.67, P = 0.028). These patients also had 11 of 20 cardiovascular risk factors, significantly higher than in those without a prior PCI. Multivariate subgroup analysis indicated that patients with a prior coronary stent were more likely to have an episode of congestive heart failure (CHF) after 1 year of surgery (16.8%, P = 0.045). In addition, an acute cardiac ischemic event was more likely within 1 year (2.0%, P = 0.036) and beyond 1 year (4.0%, P = 0.022) of surgery. Importantly, there was no significant increase in death, myocardial infarction, MACE, or bleeding in patients with a preoperative coronary stent.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients who underwent PCI with coronary stent and then went on to require a vascular procedure had significantly more cardiovascular (CV) risk factors and were more likely to have an endovascular procedure than those patients without preoperative PCI. When controlling for CV risk factors and procedure type, there was no significant difference in death, MI, MACE, or bleeding complications between the groups.

In vitro effects of recombinant activated factor VII on thrombin generation and coagulation following inhibition of platelet procoagulant activity by prasugrel

INTRODUCTION

Prasugrel is a thienopyridyl P2Y12 antagonist with potent antiplatelet effects. At present, little is known about its effects on thrombin generation or what strategies may emergently reverse its anticoagulant effects. In the current study we evaluated whether recombinant activated factor VII may reverse prasugrel induced effects and increase thrombin generation in an in vitro model.

METHODS

The effect of prasugrel active metabolite, PAM (R-138727), was evaluated on platelet aggregation, thrombin generation, and rotational thromboelastometry parameters using blood from 20 healthy volunteers. Additionally, we evaluated the effects of adenosine diphosphate (ADP) and recombinant activated factor VII on restoring these parameters towards baseline values.

RESULTS

PAM reduced maximum platelet aggregation and led to platelet disaggregation. It also decreased peak thrombin, increased lag time, and increased time to peak thrombin. Treatment with recombinant activated factor VII restored all three parameters of thrombin generation towards baseline. ADP decreased lag time and time to peak thrombin, but had no effect on peak thrombin. When recombinant activated factor VII and ADP were combined they had a greater effect on thrombin parameters than either drug alone. PAM also increased thromboelastometric clotting time and clot formation time, but had no effect on maximum clot firmness. Treatment with either recombinant activated factor VII or ADP restored these values towards baseline.

CONCLUSIONS

Recombinant activated factor VII restores thrombin generation in the presence of PAM. In patients taking prasugrel with life-threatening refractory bleeding it has the potential to be a useful therapeutic approach. Additional clinical studies are needed to validate our findings.

The perioperative management of patients with coronary artery stents: surveying the clinical stakeholders and arriving at a consensus regarding optimal care

BACKGROUND

The perioperative management of patients with a coronary artery stent is a major patient safety issue currently confronting clinicians. Surgery on a patient on antiplatelet therapy creates the following dilemma: is it better to withdraw the drugs and reduce the hemorrhagic risk or to maintain them and reduce the risk of a myocardial ischemic event?

METHODS

An electronic survey was used to sample a cross-section of local clinicians regarding the perioperative management of patients with an indwelling coronary artery stent. The reiterative Consensus-Oriented Decision-Making model was applied by an institutional task force with representation from anesthesiology, cardiology, primary care medicine, and surgery.

RESULTS

Significant disagreement existed among the multidisciplinary survey respondents regarding various aspects of the perioperative management of patients with indwelling coronary artery stents.

CONCLUSIONS

We clarified the perioperative risk factors for coronary stent thrombosis and an alternate process for immediate access to a cardiac catheterization laboratory at our institution.