Pain experiences among those living with hidradenitis suppurativa: a qualitative study

Factors Affecting Treatment Selection Among Patients With Hidradenitis Suppurativa

Importance

Despite the US Food and Drug Administration's approval of adalimumab for the treatment of hidradenitis suppurativa (HS), prescription rates remain low, indicating a critical gap between evidence-based guidelines and clinical practice. Understanding the medical decision-making process that these patients use when considering biologic agents and other HS therapies may uncover opportunities for improved patient-physician communication and HS disease control.

Objective

To elucidate factors that affect the medical decision-making process for patients with HS, with an emphasis on biologic therapies.

Design, Setting, and Participants

Open-ended semistructured interviews were conducted with English-speaking adults with HS (aged ≥18 years) recruited from 2 dermatology clinics that are part of Emory University School of Medicine in Atlanta, Georgia. All participants had an average 7-day pain score of 1 or higher on a 0- to 10-point numeric rating scale. Surveys were conducted between November 2019 and March 2020, and data were analyzed from December 2021 to August 2022. Data collection continued until thematic saturation was reached at 21 interviews.

Results

A total of 21 participants (median [IQR] age, 38.5 [27.9-43.4] years; 16 females [76%]) were included in the analysis. Almost all participants (96%) had Hurley stage II or III disease, and 15 (71%) had a history of adalimumab use. Suffering threshold, perceptions of treatment risk, treatment fatigue, disease understanding, and sources of information (included dermatologists, the internet, advertisements, and friends and loved ones) were identified as factors affecting participants' decisions to initiate new treatments for HS.

Conclusions and Relevance

Results of this qualitative study suggest that mitigating misconceptions about treatment risk, identifying gaps in disease knowledge, and emphasizing early treatment to prevent scarring and disease progression may empower patients with HS to engage in treatment planning and to try new therapies.

IRAK4 degrader in hidradenitis suppurativa and atopic dermatitis: a phase 1 trial

Toll-like receptor-driven and interleukin-1 (IL-1) receptor-driven inflammation mediated by IL-1 receptor-associated kinase 4 (IRAK4) is involved in the pathophysiology of hidradenitis suppurativa (HS) and atopic dermatitis (AD). KT-474 (SAR444656), an IRAK4 degrader, was studied in a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase 1 trial where the primary objective was safety and tolerability. Secondary objectives included pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics and clinical activity in patients with moderate to severe HS and in patients with moderate to severe AD. KT-474 was administered as a single dose and then daily for 14 d in 105 healthy volunteers (HVs), followed by dosing for 28 d in an open-label cohort of 21 patients. Degradation of IRAK4 was observed in HV blood, with mean reductions after a single dose of ≥93% at 600-1,600 mg and after 14 daily doses of ≥95% at 50-200 mg. In patients, similar IRAK4 degradation was achieved in blood, and IRAK4 was normalized in skin lesions where it was overexpressed relative to HVs. Reduction of disease-relevant inflammatory biomarkers was demonstrated in the blood and skin of patients with HS and patients with AD and was associated with improvement in skin lesions and symptoms. There were no drug-related infections. These results, from what, to our knowledge, is the first published clinical trial using a heterobifunctional degrader, provide initial proof of concept for KT-474 in HS and AD to be further confirmed in larger trials. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT04772885 .

Outcome Measures for the Evaluation of Treatment Response in Hidradenitis Suppurativa for Clinical Practice: A HiSTORIC Consensus Statement

Importance

Although several clinician- and patient-reported outcome measures have been developed for trials in hidradenitis suppurativa (HS), there is currently no consensus on which measures are best suited for use in clinical practice. Identifying validated and feasible measures applicable to the practice setting has the potential to optimize treatment strategies and generate generalizable evidence that may inform treatment guidelines.

Objective

To establish consensus on a core set of clinician- and patient-reported outcome measures recommended for use in clinical practice and to establish the appropriate interval within which these measures should be applied.

Evidence Review

Clinician- and patient-reported HS measures and studies describing their psychometric properties were identified through literature reviews. Identified measures comprised an item reduction survey and subsequent electronic Delphi (e-Delphi) consensus rounds. In each consensus round, a summary of outcome measure components and scoring methods was provided to participants. Experts were provided with feasibility characteristics of clinician measures to aid selection. Consensus was achieved if at least 67% of respondents agreed with use of a measure in clinical practice.

Findings

Among HS experts, response rates for item reduction, e-Delphi round 1, and e-Delphi round 2 surveys were 76.4% (42 of 55), 90.5% (38 of 42), and 92.9% (39 of 42), respectively; among patient research partners (PRPs), response rates were 70.8% (17 of 24), 100% (17 of 17), and 82.4% (14 of 17), respectively. The majority of experts across rounds were practicing dermatologists with 18 to 19 years of clinical experience. In the final e-Delphi round, most PRPs were female (12 [85.7%] vs 2 males [11.8%]) and aged 30 to 49 years. In the final e-Delphi round, HS experts and PRPs agreed with the use of the HS Investigator Global Assessment (28 [71.8%]) and HS Quality of Life score (13 [92.9%]), respectively. The most expert-preferred assessment interval in which to apply these measures was 3 months (27 [69.2%]).

Conclusions and Relevance

An international group of HS experts and PRPs achieved consensus on a core set of HS measures suitable for use in clinical practice. Consistent use of these measures may lead to more accurate assessments of HS disease activity and life outcomes, facilitating shared treatment decision-making in the practice setting.

Healthcare experiences among patients with hidradenitis suppurativa: a qualitative study

In this qualitative study, 21 adults living with hidradenitis suppurativa (HS) were interviewed about their healthcare experiences. Participants detailed how delay in diagnosis, lack of provider knowledge, inadequate pain management, poor access to care and stigmatization negatively affected their interactions with the healthcare system. Improving disease knowledge among providers, proactively addressing HS-related pain and coordinating access to multidisciplinary care may improve healthcare experiences among individuals living with HS.

The Influence of Pain on Reduced Quality of Life in Patients with Hidradenitis Suppurativa: A Single-Center Retrospective Study

BACKGROUND

Pain and itch are impactful and burdensome symptoms of hidradenitis suppurativa (HS). Elucidating factors associated with pain and itch severity may identify groups disproportionally affected by HS-related pain and itch and further our understanding of how pain and itch impact quality of life (QoL) in patients with HS.

OBJECTIVE

The objective of the study was to determine factors associated with pain severity, itch severity, and reduced QoL in patients with HS.

METHODS

This is a retrospective cross-sectional study of 257 adults with HS who received care in an HS Specialty Clinic from January 2019 to August 2021. Multivariable mixed-effects linear regression was used to determine the relationships between clinical and demographic patient factors and the outcomes of pain severity, itch severity, and skin-specific QoL.

RESULTS

Factors associated with reduced QoL were Hurley stage II (β = 19.66, 95% CI: 1.40-37.93) and III (β = 21.98, 95% CI: 1.57-42.39) disease as well as severity of pain (β = 13.74, 95% CI: 11.93-15.55), itch (β = 4.57, 95% CI: 2.59-6.55), anxiety (β = 2.55 95% CI: 1.29-3.81), and depression (β = 1.43, 95% CI: 0.30-2.56). Increasing HS pain severity was associated with Hurley stage III disease (β = 2.04, 95% Cl: 0.99-3.09), black race (β = 1.23, 95% Cl: 0.40, 2.06), depression severity (β = 0.08, 95% Cl: 0.02, 0.14), and anxiety severity (β = 0.10 95% Cl: 0.04, 0.17). Factors associated with HS itch severity were Hurley stage III disease (β = 2.23, 95% Cl: 1.19, 3.27), black race (β = 0.92, 95% Cl: 0.07, 1.78), depression severity (β = 0.09, 95% Cl: 0.04, 0.14), and anxiety severity (β = 0.07, 95% Cl: 0.01, 0.13).

CONCLUSION

Pain is one of the largest contributors to QoL in patients with HS; on a 0-10 numeric rating scale, a 2-point increase in HS pain had a similar independent effect on QoL as having Hurley stage III disease compared to Hurley stage I.

Understanding Hurley Stage III Hidradenitis Suppurativa Patients' Experiences With Pain: A Cross-Sectional Analysis

BACKGROUND

More than 90% of patients with hidradenitis suppurativa (HS) report that pain interferes with their quality of life (QoL) and pain may have a larger impact on QoL than disease severity alone.

OBJECTIVES

The purpose of this study was to understand the impact of pain on the daily lives of patients with Hurley stage III HS.

METHODS

This was a single-center, prospective cross-sectional study that was conducted at Beacon Dermatology in Calgary, AB. Patients ≥ 18 years old with Hurley stage III HS in at least one area of the body were prospectively invited to participate in this study. The study consisted of survey questions on patients' demographic information, past medical histories, HS-related pain histories, and previous therapies for pain management. Additionally, patients completed a series of standardized rating scales on their pain and overall QoL.

RESULTS

Of the 10 patients that participated in the study, 90% (9/10) expressed a desire for more counselling on pain management options. Many patients (8/10, 80%) reported routine use of over-the-counter pain medications and 70% (7/10) used complementary and alternative medicines (CAMs) to manage their pain. Patients' efficacy ratings of HS treatments in controlling their pain revealed that topical treatments provided minimal or no relief, while surgical interventions had the highest efficacy for reducing pain. Patients' average worst pain over the preceding 24 hrs was 6.3 +/- 2.5 (2-9) on the Numerical Rating Scale for pain and the mean Dermatology Life Quality Index score was 19.5 +/- 8.2 (5-29).

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with Hurley stage III HS report high levels of daily pain and QoL impairment and many individuals use over-the-counter treatments and CAMs to manage their pain. Physicians involved in the care of HS patients should consider implementing routine counselling on pain management into their clinical practices, especially for patients with severe HS.

Living with hidradenitis suppurativa: managing the pain

“extraordinarily debilitating. I can’t work, I can’t do school. I can’t function and....every day moving on with my life turns into the worst thing ever”. Only a hard-hearted clinician could read this quote from a woman living with Hidradenitis Suppurativa (HS) and not be moved. The qualitative study in this issue of pain experiences in HS reveals a disconnect between patients and practitioners and offers new insights that may help improve HS care.