Advances in the management of generalized convulsive status epilepticus: what have we learned?

Early and established status epilepticus: The impact of timing of intervention, treatment escalation and dosing on outcome

OBJECTIVE

We investigated the management and outcome of early and established status epilepticus including timing, dosing and selection of benzodiazepines along with the timing and efficacy of second line treatments.

METHODS

Retrospective single tertiary centre observational cohort study to identify all cases of SE between January 2019 and February 2022.

RESULTS

252 cases were identified. Seizures terminated spontaneously in 136 (54%) cases. 116 (46%) were given benzodiazepines, of which 29 (25%) were given at least one benzodiazepine by family/carers, and 72 (62.1%) received benzodiazepines by ambulance services. Benzodiazepines terminated seizures in 83 (71.6%) cases. The commonest benzodiazepine used was buccal midazolam (35.5%). Median time to first benzodiazepine was 14.5 (6-27) minutes. There was a positive correlation between time to first benzodiazepine and time to seizure cessation, progression to second- and third-line treatment, and respiratory complications (p<0.05). 73 (62.9%) cases received a correct benzodiazepine dose. Benzodiazepine underdosing was associated with longer seizure duration (p<0.05). 33 (28.4%) cases progressed to second-line treatment where mean time to treatment was 59.4 min (±32.3 min). The commonest second-line treatment was Levetiracetam (53.8%), followed by Phenytoin (43.6%) with SE termination in 57.5% cases. 14 (12.1%) cases progressed to third-line treatment; mean time to treatment was 60.6 min (±22.24 min). Respiratory complications occurred in 17 (6.75%) cases; none due to benzodiazepines. There were two deaths in refractory SE.

CONCLUSION

Early administration of benzodiazepines and optimal dosing is associated with a higher rate of SE termination. Levetiracetam was the most commonly used second line treatment.

Management of convulsive status epilepticus: recent updates

Convulsive status epilepticus (SE) is a medical emergency associated with high morbidity and mortality. Recently, clinical trials and meta-analyses investigating medical treatment of SE have been published. Benzodiazepine is well known as the first-line treatment for SE. Recent evidence suggests the equivalence of intravenous fosphenytoin, valproate, and levetiracetam for treatment of established SE. There is lack of evidence regarding treatment for refractory SE. Intravenous midazolam is commonly used, and recent evidence supports the use of ketamine. Additional studies are needed to improve the management of convulsive SE.

The etiology and mortality of new-onset refractory status epilepticus (NORSE) in adults: A systematic review and meta-analysis

New-onset refractory status epilepticus (NORSE) is a devastating neurological presentation. There is a paucity of large studies on NORSE as it is a relatively new clinical syndrome. The aim of this review was to summarize the etiologies and establish a mortality rate for NORSE. Two independent authors systematically searched the following electronic databases from January 1, 2005 April 20, 2021: PubMed, Embase, OVID, Scopus, Web of Science, "Clinicaltrials.gov," and the International Standard Randomised Controlled Trial Number (ISRCTN) registry. We included all primary research studies of NORSE in adults and excluded commentaries, reviews, pre-clinical studies, and pediatric populations. Etiology was extracted from all studies meeting eligibility criteria, whereas data relating to treatments, hospital stay, functional outcomes, and mortality were extracted from studies with sample size ≥5. We conducted a random-effects meta-analysis of mortality rate with meta-regression testing for significant covariates. Of 1482 studies, 109 case reports and case series met our criteria, comprising 395 cases of NORSE. The most common etiology was cryptogenic in 197 cases (49.9%), followed by autoimmune in 143 cases (36.2%). The pooled mortality rate was 22% (95% confidence interval 17%-27%; N studies  = 15), with low heterogeneity ( I 2  = 0%). Meta-regression revealed that year of study, treatment with ketogenic diet or immunotherapy, percentage of cryptogenic cases, and length of intensive care unit stay were not significant covariates for mortality. Common treatments included antiseizure medications (median 5), general anesthesia, and immunotherapy such as corticosteroids, intravenous immunoglobulin, and plasma exchange. Mean length of intensive care admission was 33.4 days, with 52% of cases diagnosed with epilepsy on discharge. Neurocognitive impairment was a common sequela of NORSE. NORSE is associated with a high mortality. Half of cases remain cryptogenic, which presents a diagnostic challenge. Future focus should be on elucidating the underlying neurobiology and determining the most effective therapeutic interventions.

Neurotoxicity evoked by organophosphates and available countermeasures

Organophosphorus compounds (OP) are a constant problem, both in the military and in the civilian field, not only in the form of acute poisoning but also for their long-lasting consequences. No antidote has been found that satisfactorily protects against the toxic effects of organophosphates. Likewise, there is no universal cure to avert damage after poisoning. The key mechanism of organophosphate toxicity is the inhibition of acetylcholinesterase. The overstimulation of nicotinic or muscarinic receptors by accumulated acetylcholine on a synaptic cleft leads to activation of the glutamatergic system and the development of seizures. Further consequences include generation of reactive oxygen species (ROS), neuroinflammation, and the formation of various other neuropathologists. In this review, we present neuroprotection strategies which can slow down the secondary nerve cell damage and alleviate neurological and neuropsychiatric disturbance. In our opinion, there is no unequivocal approach to ensure neuroprotection, however, sooner the neurotoxicity pathway is targeted, the better the results which can be expected. It seems crucial to target the key propagation pathways, i.e., to block cholinergic and, foremostly, glutamatergic cascades. Currently, the privileged approach oriented to stimulating GABA_AR by benzodiazepines is of limited efficacy, so that antagonizing the hyperactivity of the glutamatergic system could provide an even more efficacious approach for terminating OP-induced seizures and protecting the brain from permanent damage. Encouraging results have been reported for tezampanel, an antagonist of GluK1 kainate and AMPA receptors, especially in combination with caramiphen, an anticholinergic and anti-glutamatergic agent. On the other hand, targeting ROS by antioxidants cannot or already developed neuroinflammation does not seem to be very productive as other processes are also involved.

Has the mortality of status epilepticus changed over the past few decades?

Earlier and more aggressive treatment of status epilepticus has long been established orthodoxy. In addition to increasing therapeutic options, it is of critical importance to understand whether or not this has translated into improved prognosis. In this review, we examine the evidence as to whether the mortality of convulsive status epilepticus changed over the past few decades. In particular, we discuss a recent systematic review and meta-analysis examining this question and its implications. We discuss potential reasons why there is no evidence of improved prognosis in terms of mortality and ways in which this may be addressed. Finally, we advocate the urgent need for accurate data on functional outcomes in non-fatal cases of status epilepticus. This paper was presented at the 8th London-Innsbruck Colloquium on Status Epilepticus and Acute Seizures held in September 2022.

Optimal Management of Status Epilepticus in Children in the Emergency Setting: A Review of Recent Advances

Convulsive status epilepticus (CSE) is the most common neurological emergency in children and the second most common neurological emergency in adults. Mortality is low, but morbidity, including neuro-disability, learning difficulties, and a de-novo epilepsy, may be as high as 22%. The longer the duration of CSE, the more difficult it is to terminate, and the greater the risk of morbidity. Convulsive status epilepticus is usually managed using specific national or local algorithms. The first-line treatment is administered when a tonic-clonic or focal motor clonic seizure has lasted five minutes (impending or premonitory CSE). Second-line treatment is administered when the CSE has persisted after two doses of a first-line treatment (established CSE). Randomised clinical trial (RCT) evidence supports the use of benzodiazepines as a first-line treatment of which the most common are buccal or intra-nasal midazolam, rectal diazepam and intravenous lorazepam. Alternative drugs, for which there are considerably less RCT data, are intra-muscular midazolam and intravenous clonazepam. Up until 2019, phenobarbital and phenytoin (or fosphenytoin) were the preferred second-line treatments but with no good supporting RCT evidence. Robust RCT data are now available which has provided important information on second-line treatments, specifically phenytoin (or fosphenytoin), levetiracetam and sodium valproate. Lacosamide is an alternative second-line treatment but with no supporting RCT evidence. Current evidence indicates that first, buccal or intranasal midazolam or intravenous lorazepam are the most effective and the most patient and carer-friendly first-line anti-seizure medications to treat impending or premonitory CSE and second, that there is no difference in efficacy between levetiracetam, phenytoin (or fosphenytoin) or sodium valproate for the treatment of established CSE. Pragmatically, levetiracetam or sodium valproate are preferred to phenytoin (or fosphenytoin) because of their ease of administration and lack of serious adverse side-effects, including potentially fatal cardiac arrhythmias. Sodium valproate must be used with caution in children aged three and under because of the rare risk of hepatotoxicity and particularly if there is an underlying mitochondrial disorder.

Why won't it stop? The dynamics of benzodiazepine resistance in status epilepticus

Status epilepticus is a life-threatening neurological emergency that affects both adults and children. Approximately 36% of episodes of status epilepticus do not respond to the current preferred first-line treatment, benzodiazepines. The proportion of episodes that are refractory to benzodiazepines is higher in low-income and middle-income countries (LMICs) than in high-income countries (HICs). Evidence suggests that longer episodes of status epilepticus alter brain physiology, thereby contributing to the emergence of benzodiazepine resistance. Such changes include alterations in GABA_A receptor function and in the transmembrane gradient for chloride, both of which erode the ability of benzodiazepines to enhance inhibitory synaptic signalling. Often, current management guidelines for status epilepticus do not account for these duration-related changes in pathophysiology, which might differentially impact individuals in LMICs, where the average time taken to reach medical attention is longer than in HICs. In this Perspective article, we aim to combine clinical insights and the latest evidence from basic science to inspire a new, context-specific approach to efficiently managing status epilepticus.

Management of Status Epilepticus, Refractory Status Epilepticus, and Super-refractory Status Epilepticus

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Status epilepticus is a serious condition caused by disorders and diseases that affect the central nervous system. In status epilepticus, hypersynchronous epileptic activity lasts longer than the usual duration of isolated self-limited seizures (time t1), which causes neuronal damage or alteration of neuronal networks at a certain time point (time t2), depending on the type of and duration of status epilepticus. The successful management of status epilepticus includes both the early termination of seizure activity and the earliest possible identification of a causative etiology, which may require independent acute treatment. In nonconvulsive status epilepticus, patients present only with subtle clinical signs or even without any visible clinical manifestations. In these cases, EEG allows for the assessment of cerebral function and identification of patterns in need of urgent treatment.

RECENT FINDINGS

In 2015, the International League Against Epilepsy proposed a new definition and classification of status epilepticus, encompassing four axes: symptomatology, etiology, EEG, and age. Various validation studies determined the practical usefulness of EEG criteria to identify nonconvulsive status epilepticus. The American Clinical Neurophysiology Society has incorporated these criteria into their most recent critical care EEG terminology in 2021. Etiology, age, symptomatology, and the metabolic demand associated with an increasing duration of status epilepticus are the most important determinants of prognosis. The consequences of status epilepticus can be visualized in vivo by MRI studies.

SUMMARY

The current knowledge about status epilepticus allows for a more reliable diagnosis, earlier treatment, and improved cerebral imaging of its consequences. Outcome prediction is a soft tool for estimating the need for intensive care resources.

An Interplay Between Post-Traumatic Epilepsy and Associated Cognitive Decline: A Systematic Review

Background

Post-traumatic epilepsy (PTE) is a devastating neurological outcome of traumatic brain injury (TBI), which may negatively impact the quality of life of patients with TBI, and may impose a huge socioeconomic burden. This burden may be due to long-term functional outcomes associated with PTE, particularly cognitive dysfunction. To date, the relationship between TBI and PTE remains unclear, with little known about how the effect of their link on cognitive function as well.

Objective

Thus, this systematic review aimed at elucidating the relationship between PTE and cognitive impairment in adults after TBI based on available clinical studies, in hopes to aid in the development of therapeutic strategies for PTE.

Methods

A systematic literature search was performed using 6 databases; MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL, Psych INFO, Web of Science, and Cochrane to retrieve relevant clinical studies investigating the link between PTE and cognition in the context of TBI. The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) was used to assess the methodological quality of relevant studies.

Results

A total of six eligible studies were included for critical appraisal in this review after performing the inclusion and exclusion criteria, which involved 1,100 individuals, from 1996 to 2021. The selected studies were derived from the civilian and military population, with a follow-up period that ranged from 6 months to 35 years. The average quality of the involved studies was moderate (6.6, SD = 1.89). Five out of six studies found poorer cognitive performance in people with PTE, compared with those without PTE. Although the association between PTE and cognitive impairment was insignificant after controlling for specific covariates, there was a statistical trend toward significance.

Conclusion

This systematic review suggests that there may be a possible link between PTE and cognitive decline in TBI patients, with the latter being reported to occur up to 35 years post injury. Variations in sample sizes, follow-up periods, and neuropsychological assessment tools may be the limitations affecting the interpretation and significance of this relationship. Therefore, future studies with standard cognitive assessment tools may be warranted to solidify the link between TBI-PTE-cognitive dysfunction, prior to the development of therapeutic strategies.

Systematic Review Registration:https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?ID=CRD42020221702, prospero identifier: CRD42020221702.

Potential drug-drug interactions when managing status epilepticus patients in intensive care: A cohort study

AIMS

The risk for drug-drug interactions (DDIs) associated with antiseizure drugs (ASDs) used to manage status epilepticus (SE) patients in the intensive care unit (ICU) has been poorly investigated. We aimed to quantify and describe those potential DDIs and determine SE patient risk profiles.

METHODS

We conducted an observational bi-centric cohort study including all SE patients admitted to the ICU in the period 2016-2020.

RESULTS

Overall, 431 SE patients were included and 5504 potential DDIs were identified including 1772 DDIs (33%) between ASDs, 2610 DDIs (47%) between ASDs and previous usual treatments (PUTs), and 1067 DDIs (20%) between ASDs and ICU treatments (ICUTs). DDIs were moderate (n = 4871), major (n = 562) or severe (n = 16). All patients exhibited potential DDIs, which were major-to-severe DDIs in 47% of the cases. DDIs were pharmacokinetic (n = 1972, 36%), mostly involving cytochrome P450 modulators, and pharmacodynamic (n = 3477, 64%), mainly leading to increased sedation. ASD/PUT DDIs were the most frequent and severe. Age, PUT and ASD drug numbers and length of ICU stay were significantly associated with increased DDI number. We identified four SE patient profiles with different DDI risks and outcomes including (1) epileptic or brain trauma patients, (2) withdrawal syndrome patients, (3) older patients with comorbidities and (4) self-poisoned patients with psychiatric disorders and/or past epilepsy.

CONCLUSION

SE patients are subject to potential DDIs between ASDs, ASD/PUT and ASD/ICUT. Major-to-severe DDIs mostly occur between ASDs and PUTs. Physicians should pay attention to SE patient characteristics and history to limit DDI numbers and prevent their consequences.

Permanent loss of independence in adult febrile-infection-related epilepsy syndrome survivors: an underestimated and unsolved challenge

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Febrile-infection-related epilepsy syndrome (FIRES) is an exceedingly rare and devastating subtype of new-onset refractory status epilepticus, which causes refractory epilepsy and permanent neurocognitive impairment.

METHODS

This was a long-term follow-up of adult FIRES survivors treated between 2005 and 2018 as part of the EpiCARE initiative, a European Reference Network for rare and complex epilepsies. Clinical, electroencephalography, imaging and functional outcome measures are described using the Scores of Independence for Neurologic and Geriatric Rehabilitation, the modified Rankin Scale and the Global Assessment of Severity of Epilepsy Scale.

RESULTS

Six patients with refractory epilepsy following FIRES were evaluated. Despite general improvement after intensive care unit discharge, disease severity was still high at follow-up in all patients. The functional outcome, as assessed by the modified Rankin Scale, was moderately impaired in 2/6 patients. In contrast, the Scores of Independence for Neurologic and Geriatric Rehabilitation indicated a loss of independence in 5/6, serious problems in memory and planning/problem-solving in 4/6 and serious attentional problems in 3/6 patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Febrile-infection-related epilepsy syndrome survivors may regain vital functions and mobility but experience a significant loss of independence and participation due to recurring seizures, structural brain damage and neurocognitive decline. Minimization of disastrous outcomes through the systematic evaluation of rescue therapies within a network of specialized centres is crucial.