Electroencephalographic patterns in a mechanically ventilated cat with permethrin intoxication

Case summary

A 1-year-old male castrated domestic shorthair cat was presented in a condition of status epilepticus following incidental permethrin spot-on administration by its owner. General anaesthesia and mechanical positive pressure control ventilation were necessary to control the epileptic seizures and a progressive condition of hypoventilation. The cat was managed with an intravenous constant rate infusion of midazolam, propofol and ketamine associated with a low-dose intravenous lipid emulsion. A condition of non-convulsive status epilepticus was detected by serial continuous electroencephalogram (cEEG) monitoring. Initial cEEG showed paroxysmal epileptiform discharges; thus, antiseizure treatment with phenobarbital was added and a bolus of hypertonic saline solution was administered to treat suspected intracranial hypertension. A second cEEG performed 24 h later showed the presence of rare spikes and a burst-suppression pattern, so the decision was made to discontinue propofol. A third cEEG, 72 h post-hospitalisation, showed a normal encephalographic pattern; therefore, anaesthetic drugs were progressively tapered, and the patient was extubated. Five days after admission the cat was discharged on phenobarbital treatment, which was gradually tapered during the following months.

Relevance and novel information

This is the first reported case to describe cEEG monitoring during hospitalisation for feline permethrin intoxication. cEEG should be encouraged in cats with altered mental status that have previously suffered cluster seizures or status epilepticus, which could guide clinicians in the choice of antiseizure drugs.

The Seizure-Associated Genes Across Species (SAGAS) database offers insights into epilepsy genes, pathways and treatments

OBJECTIVE

Decades of genetic studies on people with many different epilepsies, and on many nonhuman species, using many different technologies, have generated a huge body of literature about the genes associated with seizures/epilepsy. Collating these data can help uncover epilepsy genes, pathways, and treatments that would otherwise be overlooked. We aimed to collate and structure these data into a database, and use the database to identify novel epilepsy genes and pathways, and to prioritize promising treatments.

METHODS

We collated all the genes associated with all types of seizures/epilepsy in all species, and quantified the supporting evidence for each gene, by manually screening ~10 000 publications, and by extracting data from existing databases.

RESULTS

The largest published dataset of epilepsy genes includes only 977 genes, whereas our database (www.sagas.ac) includes 2876 genes, which demonstrates that the number of genes that can potentially contribute to seizures/epilepsy is much higher than previously envisaged. We use our database to identify 12 hitherto unreported polygenic epilepsy genes, 479 high-confidence monogenic epilepsy genes, and 394 more biological pathways than identified using the previously largest epilepsy gene dataset. We use a unique feature of Seizure-Associated Genes Across Species-the number of citations for each gene-to demonstrate that a drug is more likely to affect seizures if there is more evidence that the genes it affects are associated with seizures, and we use these data to identify promising candidate antiseizure drugs.

SIGNIFICANCE

This database offers insights into the causes of epilepsy and its treatments, and can accelerate future epilepsy research.

Potential drug-drug interactions when managing status epilepticus patients in intensive care: A cohort study

AIMS

The risk for drug-drug interactions (DDIs) associated with antiseizure drugs (ASDs) used to manage status epilepticus (SE) patients in the intensive care unit (ICU) has been poorly investigated. We aimed to quantify and describe those potential DDIs and determine SE patient risk profiles.

METHODS

We conducted an observational bi-centric cohort study including all SE patients admitted to the ICU in the period 2016-2020.

RESULTS

Overall, 431 SE patients were included and 5504 potential DDIs were identified including 1772 DDIs (33%) between ASDs, 2610 DDIs (47%) between ASDs and previous usual treatments (PUTs), and 1067 DDIs (20%) between ASDs and ICU treatments (ICUTs). DDIs were moderate (n = 4871), major (n = 562) or severe (n = 16). All patients exhibited potential DDIs, which were major-to-severe DDIs in 47% of the cases. DDIs were pharmacokinetic (n = 1972, 36%), mostly involving cytochrome P450 modulators, and pharmacodynamic (n = 3477, 64%), mainly leading to increased sedation. ASD/PUT DDIs were the most frequent and severe. Age, PUT and ASD drug numbers and length of ICU stay were significantly associated with increased DDI number. We identified four SE patient profiles with different DDI risks and outcomes including (1) epileptic or brain trauma patients, (2) withdrawal syndrome patients, (3) older patients with comorbidities and (4) self-poisoned patients with psychiatric disorders and/or past epilepsy.

CONCLUSION

SE patients are subject to potential DDIs between ASDs, ASD/PUT and ASD/ICUT. Major-to-severe DDIs mostly occur between ASDs and PUTs. Physicians should pay attention to SE patient characteristics and history to limit DDI numbers and prevent their consequences.

Efficacy and tolerability of antiseizure drugs

Drug-resistant epilepsy occurs in 25-30% of patients. Furthermore, treatment with a first-generation antiseizure drug (ASD) fails in 30-40% of individuals because of their intolerable adverse effects. Over the past three decades, 20 newer- (second- and third-)generation ASDs with unique mechanisms of action and pharmacokinetic profiles have been introduced into clinical practice. This advent has expanded the therapeutic armamentarium of epilepsy and broadens the choices of ASDs to match the individual patient's characteristics. In recent years, research has been focused on defining the ASD of choice for different seizure types. In 2017, the International League Against Epilepsy published a new classification for seizure types and epilepsy syndrome. This classification has been of paramount importance to accurately classify the patient's seizure type(s) and prescribe the ASD that is appropriate. A year later, the American Academy of Neurology published a new guideline for ASD selection in adult and pediatric patients with new-onset and treatment-resistant epilepsy. The guideline primarily relied on studies that compare the first-generation and second-generation ASDs, with limited data for the efficacy of third-generation drugs. While researchers have been called for investigating those drugs in future research, epilepsy specialists may wish to share their personal experiences to support the treatment guidelines. Given the rapid advances in the development of ASDs in recent years and the continuous updates in definitions, classifications, and treatment guidelines for seizure types and epilepsy syndromes, this review aims to present a complete overview of the current state of the literature about the efficacy and tolerability of ASDs and provide guidance to clinicians about selecting appropriate ASDs for initial treatment of epilepsy according to different seizure types and epilepsy syndromes based on the current literature and recent US and UK practical guidelines.

Neuropharmacology of Antiseizure Drugs

BACKGROUND

Antiseizure drugs (ASDs) are the primary therapy for epilepsy, with more than 20 drugs introduced into clinical practice to date. These drugs are typically grouped by their mechanisms of action and therapeutic spectrum. This article aims to educate non-neurologists and medical students about the new frontiers in the pharmacology of ASDs and presents the current state of the literature on the efficacy and tolerability of these agents.

METHODS

Randomized controlled trials, observational studies, and evidence-based meta-analyses of ASD efficacy and tolerability as initial monotherapy for epileptic seizures and syndromes were identified in PubMed, EMBASE, the Cochrane Library, and Elsevier Clinical Pharmacology.

RESULTS

The choice of ASD varies primarily according to the seizure type. Practical guidelines for ASD selection in patients with new-onset and drug-resistant epilepsy were recently published. The guidelines have shown that the newer-generation drugs, which have unique mechanistic and pharmacokinetic properties, are better tolerated but have similar efficacy compared with the older drugs. Several ASDs are effective as first-line monotherapy in focal seizures, including lamotrigine, carbamazepine, phenytoin, levetiracetam, and zonisamide. Valproate remains the first-line drug for many patients with generalized and unclassified epilepsies. However, valproate should be avoided, if possible, in women of childbearing potential because of teratogenicity. Toxicity profile precludes several drugs from use as first-line treatment, for example, vigabatrin, felbamate, and rufinamide.

CONCLUSIONS

Antiseizure drugs have different pharmacologic profiles that should be considered when selecting and prescribing these agents for epilepsy. These include pharmacokinetic properties, propensity for drug-drug interactions, and adverse effects.

Evaluation of the effect of phenobarbital administration on the biochemistry profile, with a focus on serum liver values, in epileptic cats

OBJECTIVES

Phenobarbital (PB) is the most common antiseizure drug (ASD) used for the management of feline epilepsy. In dogs, PB is known to cause serum liver enzyme induction and hepatotoxicity, especially after administration long term or in high concentrations. In cats, insufficient evidence is available to draw similar conclusions. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of PB administration on the serum biochemistry profile of epileptic cats. As an additional objective, other adverse effects arising, related to PB treatment, were recorded.

METHODS

Medical records of four veterinary centres were retrospectively reviewed for epileptic cats receiving PB treatment. Cats were included if they had a diagnosis of idiopathic epilepsy or structural epilepsy; a normal baseline serum biochemistry profile; at least one follow-up serum biochemistry profile; no concurrent disease or had not received medication that could possibly influence liver function or lead to serum liver enzyme induction. Alkaline phosphatase, alanine aminotransferase (ALT), aspartate transaminase and gamma-glutamyl transferase activities, and total bilirubin, bile acids, glucose, albumin, total protein, urea and creatinine concentrations before and during PB administration were recorded. PB serum concentration was also recorded, when available.

RESULTS

Thirty-three cats (24 males, nine females) with a median age of 3 years (range 2 months to 12 years) met the inclusion criteria. Idiopathic or structural epilepsy was diagnosed in 25 (76%) and eight (24%) cats, respectively. The follow-up period ranged from 9 to 62 months. This study found an increase in ALT in three cats, possibly related to a PB serum concentration >30 µg/ml. No statistically significant increase in serum liver enzymes or other evaluated biochemistry parameters was found by comparing pre- and post-treatment parameters.

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

PB administration did not result in hepatic enzyme induction or other biochemical abnormalities in cats. This strengthens the safety profile of PB as an ASD in cats.

Is the mechanism of action of antiseizure drugs a key element in the choice of treatment?

About 25 antiseizure drugs are available for the treatment of patients with epilepsy. The choice of the most suited drug for a specific patient is primarily based on the results of the pivotal randomized clinical trials and on the patient's characteristics and comorbidities. Whether or not the mechanism of action of the antiseizure drugs should be also taken into account to better predict the patient's response to the treatment remains a matter of debate. Despite the apparent complexity and diversity of antiseizure drug mechanisms of action, the reality unfortunately remains that they are very close, in particular with regard to their relationship with the pathophysiology of epilepsy. With the only exception of the association between lamotrigine and sodium valproate, there are no clinical data that formally support a synergistic association between certain antiseizure drugs in terms of efficacy. However, anticipating risk of adverse events by limiting as far as possible the combination of drugs, which share the same mechanisms of action, is undoubtedly an important driver of daily therapeutic decisions.

Novel seizure outcomes in patients with Lennox-Gastaut syndrome: Post hoc analysis of seizure-free days in rufinamide Study 303

OBJECTIVE

Drug development for patients with Lennox-Gastaut syndrome (LGS) is based on clinical trials that use drop seizure counts. However, such counts do not assess total seizure burden and affect a patient's quality of life (QoL). In this post hoc analysis, we evaluated two novel seizure efficacy parameters related to QoL in pediatric patients with LGS, using seizure diary data from rufinamide Study 303 (NCT01405053).

METHODS

Study 303 was a phase III, multicenter, randomized, controlled, open-label study involving patients aged ≥1 to <4 years with inadequately controlled LGS. Patients were randomized 2:1 to receive add-on therapy with rufinamide or any other approved antiseizure drug (ASD), in addition to their existing treatment of 1-3 ASDs, across a 106-week treatment phase. Seizure diaries, completed by parents or caregivers, recorded seizure occurrence, and were used in this post hoc analysis to evaluate two novel efficacy parameters comparing baseline vs postbaseline mean number of seizure-free days and assessing time to reach the number of prerandomization seizures for patients receiving rufinamide or any other ASD.

RESULTS

Patients received rufinamide (n = 25) or any other ASD (n = 12). For rufinamide, mean number of seizure-free days was 42.2% greater postbaseline compared with baseline (P < 0.0001); only one rufinamide patient experienced a decrease in number of seizure-free days postbaseline. Median time to reach the baseline number of seizures increased by 10.5 days for rufinamide and 0.5 days for the any-other-ASD group during the treatment phase, to 46.0 and 54.0 days, respectively.

SIGNIFICANCE

Both of these novel and contrasting endpoints demonstrated potential improvements in seizure outcomes in patients receiving rufinamide postbaseline vs baseline. Although these parameters should be investigated in larger patient populations, our initial findings suggest that they could be applied as predefined primary endpoints for seizure assessment in future clinical trials for LGS drug development.

Lamotrigine pharmacokinetics following oral and stable-labeled intravenous administration in young and elderly adult epilepsy patients: Effect of age

OBJECTIVE

The objectives of this study were to investigate the effect of age on pharmacokinetic parameters of lamotrigine (LTG) and estimate parameter variability.

METHODS

Patients (>18 years old) who were already on a steady-state dose of LTG therapy with no interacting comedications were enrolled. Patients with significant cardiac disease, severe kidney dysfunction, or moderate-to-severe liver dysfunction were excluded. Fifty milligrams of a stable-labeled intravenous LTG formulation (SL-LTG) replaced 50 mg of a patient's normal daily oral LTG dose. Thirteen blood samples were collected in each person over 96 hours. SL-LTG and unlabeled LTG concentrations were measured simultaneously by gas chromatography-mass spectrometry. Concentration-time data were analyzed by nonlinear mixed-effects modeling (NONMEM version 7.3).

RESULTS

Twenty-eight patients representing 16 young (18-48 years old) and 12 elderly (63-87 years old) patients were included, yielding 382 unlabeled and 351 SL-LTG concentrations. A two-compartment model with first-order absorption and elimination adequately described the plasma concentration-time data. Bioavailability of oral LTG was approximately 74% and did not differ by age. LTG clearance was 27.2% lower in elderly than in young patients (1.80 L/h for a 70-kg patient).

SIGNIFICANCE

Although LTG bioavailability was not affected by age, LTG clearance was 27.2% lower in elderly versus young patients of comparable body weight, possibly indicating lower dosages being needed in this population.

Factors in Variability of Serial Gabapentin Concentrations in Elderly Patients with Epilepsy

OBJECTIVES

To characterize and quantify the variability of serial gabapentin concentrations in elderly patients with epilepsy.

METHODS

This study included 83 patients (age ≥ 60 yrs) from an 18-center randomized double-blind double-dummy parallel study from the Veterans Affairs Cooperative 428 Study. All patients were taking 1500 mg/day gabapentin. Within-person coefficient of variation (CV) in gabapentin concentrations, measured weekly to bimonthly for up to 52 weeks, then quarterly, was computed. Impact of patient characteristics on gabapentin concentrations (linear mixed model) and CV (linear regression) were estimated.

RESULTS

A total of 482 gabapentin concentration measurements were available for analysis. Gabapentin concentrations and intrapatient CVs ranged from 0.5 to 22.6 μg/ml (mean 7.9 μg/ml, standard deviation [SD] 4.1 μg/ml) and 2% to 79% (mean 27.9%, SD 15.3%), respectively, across all visits. Intrapatient CV was higher by 7.3% for those with a body mass index of ≥ 30 kg/m² (coefficient = 7.3, p=0.04). CVs were on average 0.5% higher for each 1-unit higher CV in creatinine clearance (coefficient = 0.5, p=0.03) and 1.2% higher for each 1-hour longer mean time after dose (coefficient = 1.2, p=0.04).

CONCLUSIONS

Substantial intrapatient variability in serial gabapentin concentration was noted in elderly patients with epilepsy. Creatinine clearance, time of sampling relative to dose, and obesity were found to be positively associated with variability.