Adenosine A1 receptor agonists inhibit trigeminovascular nociceptive transmission

Migraine signaling pathways: purine metabolites that regulate migraine and predispose migraineurs to headache

Migraine is a debilitating disorder that afflicts over 1 billion people worldwide, involving attacks that result in a throbbing and pulsating headache. Migraine is thought to be a neurovascular event associated with vasoconstriction, vasodilation, and neuronal activation. Understanding signaling in migraine pathology is central to the development of therapeutics for migraine prophylaxis and for mitigation of migraine in the prodrome phase before pain sets in. The fact that both vasoactivity and neural sensitization are involved in migraine indicates that agonists which promote these phenomena may very well be involved in migraine pathology. One such group of agonists is the purines, in particular, adenosine phosphates and their metabolites. This manuscript explores what is known about the relationship between these metabolites and migraine pathology and explores the potential for such relationships through their known signaling pathways. Reported receptor involvement in vasoaction and nociception.

Adenosine Receptors as Potential Therapeutic Analgesic Targets

Pain represents an international burden and a major socio-economic public health problem. New findings, detailed in this review, suggest that adenosine plays a significant role in neuropathic and inflammatory pain, by acting on its metabotropic adenosine receptors (A1AR, A2AAR, A2BAR, A3AR). Adenosine receptor ligands have a practical translational potential based on the favorable efficacy and safety profiles that emerged from clinical research on various agonists and antagonists for different pathologies. The present review collects the latest studies on selected adenosine receptor ligands in different pain models. Here, we also covered the many hypothesized pathways and the role of newly synthesized allosteric adenosine receptor modulators. This review aims to present a summary of recent research on adenosine receptors as prospective therapeutic targets for a range of pain-related disorders.

Migraine Treatment: Towards New Pharmacological Targets

Migraine is a debilitating neurological condition affecting millions of people worldwide. Until a few years ago, preventive migraine treatments were based on molecules with pleiotropic targets, developed for other indications, and discovered by serendipity to be effective in migraine prevention, although often burdened by tolerability issues leading to low adherence. However, the progresses in unravelling the migraine pathophysiology allowed identifying novel putative targets as calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP). Nevertheless, despite the revolution brought by CGRP monoclonal antibodies and gepants, a significant percentage of patients still remains burdened by an unsatisfactory response, suggesting that other pathways may play a critical role, with an extent of involvement varying among different migraine patients. Specifically, neuropeptides of the CGRP family, such as adrenomedullin and amylin; molecules of the secretin family, such as pituitary adenylate cyclase-activating peptide (PACAP) and vasoactive intestinal peptide (VIP); receptors, such as transient receptor potential (TRP) channels; intracellular downstream determinants, such as potassium channels, but also the opioid system and the purinergic pathway, have been suggested to be involved in migraine pathophysiology. The present review provides an overview of these pathways, highlighting, based on preclinical and clinical evidence, as well as provocative studies, their potential role as future targets for migraine preventive treatment.

CGRP physiology, pharmacology, and therapeutic targets: migraine and beyond

Calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) is a neuropeptide with diverse physiological functions. Its two isoforms (α and β) are widely expressed throughout the body in sensory neurons as well as in other cell types, such as motor neurons and neuroendocrine cells. CGRP acts via at least two G protein-coupled receptors that form unusual complexes with receptor activity-modifying proteins. These are the CGRP receptor and the AMY1 receptor; in rodents, additional receptors come into play. Although CGRP is known to produce many effects, the precise molecular identity of the receptor(s) that mediates CGRP effects is seldom clear. Despite the many enigmas still in CGRP biology, therapeutics that target the CGRP axis to treat or prevent migraine are a bench-to-bedside success story. This review provides a contextual background on the regulation and sites of CGRP expression and CGRP receptor pharmacology. The physiological actions of CGRP in the nervous system are discussed, along with updates on CGRP actions in the cardiovascular, pulmonary, gastrointestinal, immune, hematopoietic, and reproductive systems and metabolic effects of CGRP in muscle and adipose tissues. We cover how CGRP in these systems is associated with disease states, most notably migraine. In this context, we discuss how CGRP actions in both the peripheral and central nervous systems provide a basis for therapeutic targeting of CGRP in migraine. Finally, we highlight potentially fertile ground for the development of additional therapeutics and combinatorial strategies that could be designed to modulate CGRP signaling for migraine and other diseases.

Novel Therapeutic Targets for Migraine

Migraine, a primary headache disorder involving a dysfunctional trigeminal vascular system, remains a major debilitating neurological condition impacting many patients' quality of life. Despite the success of multiple new migraine therapies, not all patients achieve significant clinical benefits. The success of CGRP pathway-targeted therapy highlights the importance of translating the mechanistic understanding toward effective therapy. Ongoing research has identified multiple potential mechanisms in migraine signaling and nociception. In this narrative review, we discuss several potential emerging therapeutic targets, including pituitary adenylate cyclase-activating polypeptide (PACAP), adenosine, δ-opioid receptor (DOR), potassium channels, transient receptor potential ion channels (TRP), and acid-sensing ion channels (ASIC). A better understanding of these mechanisms facilitates the discovery of novel therapeutic targets and provides more treatment options for improved clinical care.

The role of adenosine receptor ligands on inflammatory pain: possible modulation of TRPV1 receptor function

Chronic pain has a debilitating consequences on health and lifestyle. The currently available analgesics are often ineffective and accompanied by undesirable adverse effects. Although adenosine receptors (AR) activation can affect nociceptive, inflammatory, and neuropathic pain states, the specific regulatory functions of its subtypes (A₁, A_2A, A_2B and A₃ ARs) are not fully understood. The aim of this study was to investigate the role of different AR ligands on inflammatory pain. The von Frey filament test was used to assess the anti-nociceptive effects of adenosine ligands on Complete Freund's Adjuvant (CFA)-induced mechanical allodynia in (180-220 g) adult male Sprague Dawley rats (expressed as paw withdrawal threshold, PWT). Neither the A_2AAR selective agonist CGS 21680 hydrochloride (0.1, 0.32 and 1 mg/kg) nor the A_2BAR selective agonist BAY 60-6583 (0.1, 0.32 and 1 mg/kg) produced any significant reversal of the PWT. However, the A₁AR selective agonist ( ±)-5'-Chloro-5'-deoxy-ENBA, the A₃AR selective agonist 2-Cl-IB-MECA, the A_2AAR selective antagonist ZM 241385 and the A_2BAR selective antagonist PSB 603 produced a significant reversal of the PWT at the highest dose of 1 mg/kg. Co-administration of the selective antagonists of A₁AR and A₃AR PSB36 (1 mg/ml) and MRS-3777 (1 mg/ml); respectively, significantly reversed the anti-nociceptive effects of their corresponding agonists. Furthermore, calcium imaging studies reveled that the effective AR ligands in the behavioral assay also significantly inhibit capsaicin-evoked calcium responses in cultured rat dorsal root ganglia (DRG) neurons. In conclusion, modulating the activity of the transient receptor potential vanilloid 1 (TRPV1) receptor by ARs ligands could explain their anti-nociceptive effects observed in vivo. Therefore, the cross talk between ARs and TRPV1 receptor may represent a promising targets for the treatment of inflammatory pain conditions.

Global Epidemiology, Clinical Features, Diagnosis and Current Therapeutic Novelties in Migraine Therapy and their Prevention: A Narrative Review

INTRODUCTION

The current article reviews the latest information on epidemiology, clinical features, diagnosis, recent advancements in clinical management, current therapeutic novelties, and the prevention of migraines. In a narrative review, all studies as per developed MeSH terms published until February 2023, excluding those irrelevant, were identified through a PubMed literature search.

METHODS

Overall, migraine affects more than a billion people annually and is one of the most common neurological illnesses. A wide range of comorbidities is associated with migraines, including stress and sleep disturbances. To lower the worldwide burden of migraine, comprehensive efforts are required to develop and enhance migraine treatment, which is supported by informed healthcare policy. Numerous migraine therapies have been successful, but not all patients benefit from them.

RESULTS

CGRP pathway-targeted therapy demonstrates the importance of translating mechanistic understanding into effective treatment. In this review, we discuss clinical features, diagnosis, and recently approved drugs, as well as a number of potential therapeutic targets, including pituitary adenylate cyclase-activating polypeptide (PACAP), adenosine, opioid receptors, potassium channels, transient receptor potential ion channels (TRP), and acid-sensing ion channels (ASIC).

CONCLUSION

In addition to providing more treatment options for improved clinical care, a better understanding of these mechanisms facilitates the discovery of novel therapeutic targets.

Involvement of adenosine signaling pathway in migraine pathophysiology: a systematic review of preclinical studies

Background

Adenosine is a purinergic signaling molecule with a wide range of physiological functions including anti- and pronociceptive properties. Adenosine receptors are expressed in the trigeminovascular system, and adenosine receptor antagonist, caffeine, relieves migraine headache. We performed a systematic review of the literature of preclinical data addressing the role of adenosine in migraine pathophysiology.

Methods

PubMed and EMBASE were searched for pre-clinical studies on the role of adenosine in migraine pathophysiology on September 5^th, 2021.

Results

A total of 2510 studies were screened by title and abstract. Of these, thirteen pre-clinical studies evaluating adenosine, adenosine A1, A2A and A3 receptors were included.

These studies showed that adenosine signaling pathway is involved in controlling vascular tone. Furthermore, electrical stimulation of the trigeminal ganglion modulates the expression of adenosine A₁ and A_2A receptors in the trigeminal ganglion and trigeminal nucleus caudalis implicating adenosine signaling pathway in pain transmission.

Conclusion

Preclinical studies showed that adenosine has a dual effect on vasodilation and trigeminal pain pathway due to different receptor activation, suggesting a possible role of adenosine in migraine pathophysiology. Studies investigating pharmacological characteristics of subtypes of adenosine receptors are needed to further elucidate their role as a potential target for migraine treatment.

Involvement of adenosine signaling pathway in migraine pathophysiology: A systematic review of clinical studies

OBJECTIVE

To systematically review clinical studies investigating the involvement of adenosine and its receptors in migraine pathophysiology.

BACKGROUND

Adenosine is a purinergic signaling molecule, clinically used in cardiac imaging during stress tests. Headache is a frequent adverse event after intravenous adenosine administration. Migraine headache relief is reported after intake of adenosine receptor antagonist, caffeine. These findings suggest a possible involvement of adenosine signaling in migraine pathophysiology and its potential as a drug target.

METHODS

A search through PubMed and EMBASE was undertaken for clinical studies investigating the role of adenosine and its receptors in migraine, published until September 2021.

RESULTS

A total of 2510 studies were screened by title and abstract. Of these, seven clinical studies were included. The main findings were that adenosine infusion induced headache, and plasma adenosine levels were elevated during ictal compared to interictal periods in migraine patients.

CONCLUSION

The present systematic review emphasizes a potentially important role of adenosine signaling in migraine pathogenesis. Further randomized and placebo-controlled clinical investigations applying adenosine receptors modulators in migraine patients are needed to further understand the adenosine involvement in migraine.

Caffeine and Primary (Migraine) Headaches-Friend or Foe?

Background: The actions of caffeine as an antagonist of adenosine receptors have been extensively studied, and there is no doubt that both daily and sporadic dietary consumption of caffeine has substantial biological effects on the nervous system. Caffeine influences headaches, the migraine syndrome in particular, but how is unclear. Materials and Methods: This is a narrative review based on selected articles from an extensive literature search. The aim of this study is to elucidate and discuss how caffeine may affect the migraine syndrome and discuss the potential pathophysiological pathways involved. Results: Whether caffeine has any significant analgesic and/or prophylactic effect in migraine remains elusive. Neither is it clear whether caffeine withdrawal is an important trigger for migraine. However, withdrawal after chronic exposure of caffeine may cause migraine-like headache and a syndrome similar to that experienced in the prodromal phase of migraine. Sensory hypersensitivity however, does not seem to be a part of the caffeine withdrawal syndrome. Whether it is among migraineurs is unknown. From a modern viewpoint, the traditional vascular explanation of the withdrawal headache is too simplistic and partly not conceivable. Peripheral mechanisms can hardly explain prodromal symptoms and non-headache withdrawal symptoms. Several lines of evidence point at the hypothalamus as a locus where pivotal actions take place. Conclusion: In general, chronic consumption of caffeine seems to increase the burden of migraine, but a protective effect as an acute treatment or in severely affected patients cannot be excluded. Future clinical trials should explore the relationship between caffeine withdrawal and migraine, and investigate the effects of long-term elimination.

The Role of Adenosine Signaling in Headache: A Review

Migraine is the third most prevalent disease on the planet, yet our understanding of its mechanisms and pathophysiology is surprisingly incomplete. Recent studies have built upon decades of evidence that adenosine, a purine nucleoside that can act as a neuromodulator, is involved in pain transmission and sensitization. Clinical evidence and rodent studies have suggested that adenosine signaling also plays a critical role in migraine headache. This is further supported by the widespread use of caffeine, an adenosine receptor antagonist, in several headache treatments. In this review, we highlight evidence that supports the involvement of adenosine signaling in different forms of headache, headache triggers, and basic headache physiology. This evidence supports adenosine A_2A receptors as a critical adenosine receptor subtype involved in headache pain. Adenosine A_2A receptor signaling may contribute to headache via the modulation of intracellular Cyclic adenosine monophosphate (cAMP) production or 5' AMP-activated protein kinase (AMPK) activity in neurons and glia to affect glutamatergic synaptic transmission within the brainstem. This evidence supports the further study of adenosine signaling in headache and potentially illuminates it as a novel therapeutic target for migraine.

Nucleotide homeostasis and purinergic nociceptive signaling in rat meninges in migraine-like conditions

Extracellular ATP is suspected to contribute to migraine pain but regulatory mechanisms controlling pro-nociceptive purinergic mechanisms in the meninges remain unknown. We studied the peculiarities of metabolic and signaling pathways of ATP and its downstream metabolites in rat meninges and in cultured trigeminal cells exposed to the migraine mediator calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP). Under resting conditions, meningeal ATP and ADP remained at low nanomolar levels, whereas extracellular AMP and adenosine concentrations were one-two orders higher. CGRP increased ATP and ADP levels in meninges and trigeminal cultures and reduced adenosine concentration in trigeminal cells. Degradation rates for exogenous nucleotides remained similar in control and CGRP-treated meninges, indicating that CGRP triggers nucleotide release without affecting nucleotide-inactivating pathways. Lead nitrate-based enzyme histochemistry of whole mount meninges revealed the presence of high ATPase, ADPase, and AMPase activities, primarily localized in the medial meningeal artery. ATP and ADP induced large intracellular Ca(2+) transients both in neurons and in glial cells whereas AMP and adenosine were ineffective. In trigeminal glia, ATP partially operated via P2X7 receptors. ATP, but not other nucleotides, activated nociceptive spikes in meningeal trigeminal nerve fibers providing a rationale for high degradation rate of pro-nociceptive ATP. Pro-nociceptive effect of ATP in meningeal nerves was reproduced by α,β-meATP operating via P2X3 receptors. Collectively, extracellular ATP, which level is controlled by CGRP, can persistently activate trigeminal nerves in meninges which considered as the origin site of migraine headache. These data are consistent with the purinergic hypothesis of migraine pain and suggest new targets against trigeminal pain.

An Adenosine A2A Receptor Gene Haplotype is Associated with Migraine With Aura

The adenosine A2A receptor (A2AR) facilitates effects of calcitonin gene-related peptide and vasoactive intestinal peptide, two important neuropeptides in migraine pathophysiology, and is the molecular target of caffeine, which is used in migraine treatment. We therefore determined whether A2AR gene variation might influence migraine susceptibility Migraine patients ( n = 265) with or without aura and migraine-free controls ( n = 154) were assessed and genotyped for six genetic variants spanning the A2AR gene. A six-marker haplotype was more frequent in migraine patients with aura ( P < 0.01) but not in patients without aura, compared with the control group. This indicates that A2AR gene variation may contribute to the pathogenesis of migraine with aura.

Differences of Anti-Nociceptive Mechanisms of Migraine Drugs on the Trigeminal Pain Processing during and Outside Acute Migraine Attacks

The aim of this study was to investigate central anti-nociceptive mechanisms of i.v. acetylsalicylic acid (ASA) and oral zolmitriptan (ZOL) in migraine patients and healthy subjects using the ‘nociceptive’ blink reflex (nBR). Twenty-eight migraine patients received ASA ( n = 14, 1000 mg i.v) or ZOL ( n = 14, 5 mg p.o) during the acute migraine attack and interictally. Thirty healthy subjects received either ASA or ZOL vs. placebo using a double blind cross over design. nBR was recorded in all patients and subjects before, 60 and 90 min after treatment. ASA and ZOL did not inhibit nBR responses in healthy subjects. Both ASA and ZOL suppressed nBR responses (ASA by 68%, ZOL by 78%) only during the acute attack but not interictally. The data suggest, that the anti-nociceptive effects of migraine drugs on the trigeminal nociceptive processing are different during and outside an acute migraine attack.

Expression of calcitonin gene-related peptide, adenosine A2a receptor and adenosine A1 receptor in experiment rat migraine models

A migraine is a disabling neurovascular disorder characterized by a unilateral throbbing headache that lasts from 4 to 72 h. The headache is often accompanied by nausea, vomiting, phonophobia and photophobia, and may be worsened by physical exercise. The trigeminovascular system (TVS) is speculated to have an important role in migraines, although the pathophysiology of this disorder remains to be elucidated. Trigeminal ganglion (TG) and spinal trigeminal nucleus caudalis (TNC) are important components of the TVS. Several clinical cases have provided evidence for the involvement of the brainstem in migraine initiation. Electrical stimulation of the trigeminal ganglion (ESTG) in rats can activate TVS during a migraine attack. Calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) is an important vasoactive compound produced following TVS activation. Numerous studies have revealed that adenosine and its receptors have an important role in pain transmission and regulation process. However, only a few studies have examined whether adenosine A2a receptor (A2aR) and adenosine A1 receptor (A1R) are involved in migraine and nociceptive pathways. In the present study, CGRP, A2aR and A1R expression levels were detected in the TG and TNC of ESTG models through reverse transcription-quantitative polymerase chain reaction and western blot analysis. Tianshu capsule (TSC), a type of Chinese medicine, was also used in the ESTG rat models to examine its influence on the three proteins. Results demonstrated that CGRP, A2aR and A1R mediated pain transmission and the regulation process during migraine and the expression of the three proteins was regulated by TSC.

Nociception-specific blink reflex: pharmacology in healthy volunteers

BACKGROUND

The physiology and pharmacology of activation or perception of activation of pain-coding trigeminovascular afferents in humans is fundamental to understanding the biology of headache and developing new treatments.

METHODS

The blink reflex was elicited using a concentric electrode and recorded in four separate sessions, at baseline and two minutes after administration of ramped doses of diazepam (final dose 0.07 mg/kg), fentanyl (final dose 1.11 μg/kg), ketamine (final dose 0.084 mg/kg) and 0.9 % saline solution. The AUC (area under the curve, μV*ms) and the latency (ms) of the ipsi- and contralateral R2 component of the blink reflex were calculated by PC-based offline analysis. Immediately after each block of blink reflex recordings certain psychometric parameters were assessed.

RESULTS

There was an effect due to DRUG on the ipsilateral (F 3,60 = 7.3, P < 0.001) AUC as well as on the contralateral (F 3,60 = 6.02, P < 0.001) AUC across the study. A significant decrement in comparison to placebo was observed only for diazepam, affecting the ipsilateral AUC. The scores of alertness, calmness, contentedness, reaction time and precision were not affected by the DRUG across the sessions.

CONCLUSION

Previous studies suggest central, rather than peripheral changes in nociceptive trigeminal transmission in migraine. This study demonstrates a robust effect of benzodiazepine receptor modulation of the nociception specific blink reflex (nBR) without any μ-opiate or glutamate NMDA receptor component. The nociception specific blink reflex offers a reproducible, quantifiable method of assessment of trigeminal nociceptive system in humans that can be used to dissect pharmacology relevant to primary headache disorders.

The role of purinergic signaling in the etiology of migraine and novel antimigraine treatment

Etiopathogenesis of migraine involves different structures of the central nervous system: the trigeminal nerve with nuclei located in the brain stem, vascular system, and the cerebral cortex as well as diverse mechanisms and pathological processes. The multidirectional action of purines in different cell types (blood vessels, neurons, and satellite glial cells) and through different types of purinergic receptors contributes to the etiopathogenesis of migraine pain. Adenosine triphosphate (ATP) and its derivatives are involved in initiation and propagation of migrenogenic signals in several ways: they participate in vasomotor mechanism, cortical spreading depression, and in fast transmission or cross-excitation based on the satellite glial cells in trigeminal ganglion. Contribution of purinergic signaling in the conduction of pain is realized through the activation of P1 and P2 receptors expressed widely in the central nervous system: on the neurons and glial cells as well as on the smooth muscles and endothelium in the vascular system. Therefore, the purinergic receptors can be an excellent target for pharmacologists constructing new antimigraine therapeutics. Moreover, the mechanisms facilitating ATP and adenosine degradation may prevent vasodilatation and thus avoid a secondary central sensitization during a migraine attack. Thus, agonists and antagonists of P receptors as well as ecto-enzymes metabolizing nucleotides/nucleosides could gain the growing attention as therapeutic agents.

Intravenous dextromethorphan/quinidine inhibits activity of dura-sensitive spinal trigeminal neurons in rats

BACKGROUND

Migraine is a chronic neurological disorder characterized by episodes of throbbing headaches. Practically all medications currently used in migraine prophylaxis have a number of substantial disadvantages and use limitations. Therefore, the further search for principally new prophylactic antimigraine agents remains an important task. The objective of our study was to evaluate the effects of a fixed combination of dextromethorphan hydrobromide and quinidine sulphate (DM/Q) on activity of the spinal trigeminal neurons in an electrophysiological model of trigemino-durovascular nociception.

METHODS

The study was performed in 15 male Wistar rats, which were anaesthetized with urethane/α-chloralose and paralysed using pipecuronium bromide. The effects of cumulative intravenous infusions of DM/Q (three steps performed 30 min apart, 15/7.5 mg/kg of DM/Q in 0.5 mL of isotonic saline per step) on ongoing and dural electrical stimulation-induced neuronal activities were tested in a group of eight rats over 90 min. Other seven animals received cumulative infusion of equal volumes of saline and served as control.

RESULTS

Cumulative administration of DM/Q produced steady suppression of both the ongoing activity of the spinal trigeminal neurons and their responses to electrical stimulation of the dura mater.

CONCLUSIONS

It is evident that the observed DM/Q-induced suppression of trigeminal neuron excitability can lead to a reduction in nociceptive transmission from meninges to higher centres of the brain. Since the same mechanism is believed to underlie the pharmacodynamics of many well-known antimigraine drugs, results of the present study enable us to anticipate the potential efficacy of DM/Q in migraine.

Headache and sleep: shared pathophysiological mechanisms

OBJECTIVE

The objective of the current article is to review the shared pathophysiological mechanisms which may underlie the clinical association between headaches and sleep disorders.

BACKGROUND

The association between sleep and headache is well documented in terms of clinical phenotypes. Disrupted sleep-wake patterns appear to predispose individuals to headache attacks and increase the risk of chronification, while sleep is one of the longest established abortive strategies. In agreement, narcoleptic patients show an increased prevalence of migraine compared to the general population and specific familial sleep disorders have been identified to be comorbid with migraine with aura.

CONCLUSION

The pathophysiology and pharmacology of headache and sleep disorders involves an array of neural networks which likely underlie their shared clinical association. While it is difficult to differentiate between cause and effect, or simply a spurious relationship the striking brainstem, hypothalamic and thalamic convergence would suggest a bidirectional influence.

Paranasal sinus nitric oxide and migraine: a new hypothesis on the sino rhinogenic theory

Migraine is a debilitating illness that has no exact bio molecule to explain its pathology. After reviewing the neurophysiological and biochemical basis of the research findings of nitric oxide and migraine, I present to the best of my knowledge the first para sinus nitric oxide mediated neurobiophysiological hypothesis for migraine of sino rhinogenic origin. The diffused paranasal sinus nitric oxide in the nasal mucosa could be the primary molecule that initiates migraine and is termed Sinus Hypoxic Nitric Oxide Theory. This hypothesis regards repetitive or intermittent activation of the trigeminal sensory nerve and blood vessels in the nasal mucosa. Production of paranasal sinus nitric oxide is mainly induced by hypoxia due to several independent factors and the diffusion of paranasal sinus nitric oxide depends on the vulnerable surface area in the nasal cavity. Apart from the known trigeminal nociceptive impulse in the migraine, two main peripheral trigeminal nerve activating mechanisms may induce migraine. First the nerve endings of the nasal mucosa which are directly stimulated by diffused paranasal sinus nitric oxide are indirectly stimulated by vasoactive substances released by antidromic activation of the nerve, parasympathetic efferent of the nerve and sterile neurogenic inflammation. Secondly, the perivascular nerve of nasal mucosal and the meningial blood vessels are directly stimulated by either diffused paranasal sinus nitric oxide or by shear stress mediation. The nerve impulses of the trigeminal sensory nerve, projected at trigeminal nucleus caudalis to the central nerve system and low plasma magnesium due to the consequence of shear stress gives rise to the symptoms of migraine. Moreover sino rhinogenic impulses may mediate to disruption of inhibitory sensitization modulated of sensory input and cause sensory hiperexcitability. In addition neuronal stimulation proposed by some migraine hypotheses could also give rise to migraine headache when the sino rhinogenic vulnerable factors induce the migraine pathophysiology. Indeed this article explains a new pathophysiological initiation between sino rhinogenic nitric oxide effects and migraine and provides an initial step for the obscured or neglected etiologically important neuro vascular impulse generating pathway. The patients who are clinically suspected of having headaches should receive comprehensive sino rhinological examination and evaluation based on the sinus hypoxic nitric oxide theory. A standard surgical and medical management of migraine that links with the sinus hypoxic nitric oxide theory may restore the hypoxic state or reduce or remove the paranasal sinus nitric oxide diffusing surface. It warrants clinical testing.

Prodrug approaches to reduce hyperexcitation in the CNS

Hyperexcitation in the central nervous system is the root cause of a number of disorders of the brain ranging from acute injury to chronic and progressive diseases. The major limitation to treatment of these ailments is the miniscule, yet formidable blood-brain barrier. To deliver therapeutic agents to the site of desired action, a number of biomedical engineering strategies have been developed including prodrug formulations that allow for either passive diffusion or active transport across this barrier. In the case of prodrugs, once in the brain compartment, the active therapeutic agent is released. In this review, we discuss in some detail a number of factors related to treatment of central nervous system hyperexcitation including molecular targets, disorders, prodrug strategies, and focused case studies of a number of therapeutics that are at a variety of stages of clinical development.

Spinal trigeminal neurons demonstrate an increase in responses to dural electrical stimulation in the orofacial formalin test

Primary headaches are often associated with pain in the maxillofacial region commonly classified under the term “orofacial pain” (OFP). In turn, long-lasting OFP can trigger and perpetuate headache as an independent entity, which is able to persist after the resolution of the main disorder. A close association between OFP and headache complicates their cause and effect definition and leads to misdiagnosis. The precise mechanisms underlying this phenomenon are poorly understood, partly because of the deficiency of research-related findings. We combined the animal models of OFP and headache—the orofacial formalin test and the model of trigeminovascular nociception—to investigate the neurophysiological mechanisms underlying their comorbidity. In anesthetized rats, the ongoing activity of single convergent neurons in the spinal trigeminal nucleus was recorded in parallel to their responses to the electrical stimulation of the dura mater before and after the injection of formalin into their cutaneous receptive fields. Subcutaneous formalin resulted not only in the biphasic increase in the ongoing activity, but also in an enhancement of neuronal responses to dural electrical stimulation, which had similar time profile. These results demonstrated that under tonic pain in the orofacial region a nociceptive signaling from the dura mater to convergent trigeminal neurons is significantly enhanced apparently because of the development of central sensitization; this may contribute to the comorbidity of OFP and headache.

Animal models of headache: from bedside to bench and back to bedside

In recent years bench-based studies have greatly enhanced our understanding of headache pathophysiology, while facilitating the development of new headache medicines. At present, established animal models of headache utilize activation of pain-producing cranial structures, which for a complex syndrome, such as migraine, leaves many dimensions of the syndrome unstudied. The focus on modeling the central nociceptive mechanisms and the complexity of sensory phenomena that accompany migraine may offer new approaches for the development of new therapeutics. Given the complexity of the primary headaches, multiple approaches and techniques need to be employed. As an example, recently a model for trigeminal autonomic cephalalgias has been tested successfully, while by contrast, a satisfactory model of tension-type headache has been elusive. Moreover, although useful in many regards, migraine models are yet to provide a more complete picture of the disorder.

Advances in the pathophysiology of tension-type headache: from stress to central sensitization

Tension-type headache (TTH) is the most common and most socioeconomically costly headache. Yet our knowledge regarding TTH pathophysiological mechanisms is still in its early stages. Psychological stress and weak coping mechanisms may initiate and propagate physiological pain via activation of second messengers in downstream substrates involved in pain. It seems that peripheral mechanisms are predominant in the episodic type (ETTH), whereas central mechanisms are involved in the chronic type (CTTH) of tension headache. The conversion from ETTH to CTTH is most relevant to the clinician and the patient, as CTTH is the most debilitating. This paper focuses and summarizes our current understanding of central sensitization, the process by which this conversion occurs in TTH, and proposes an integrated model to explain how ETTH progresses into CTTH in genetically susceptible individuals.

Acute treatment of migraine

Acute treatment of migraine has benefited first from major advances in pharmacological science followed in short order, sometimes preceded, by an improved understanding of pathogenesis, especially of headache. This chapter reviews the mechanisms of migraine that provide an understanding of the pharmacology and therapeutic targets for acute migraine medications. General clinical approaches to acute therapy are reviewed, and indices of acceptable acute therapeutic outcomes are discussed. Currently the serotonin (5-HT) 1B/1D agonist group of drugs, triptans, forms the mainstay of acute therapeutic regimens. Other approaches to acute treatment such as simple analgesics, non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), ergots, and combination medications are reviewed. Finally, the newest acute treatments that are currently exploratory or under clinical investigation are discussed.

Pharmacology

Headache treatment has been based primarily on experiences with non-specific drugs such as analgesics, non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, or drugs that were originally developed to treat other diseases, such as beta-blockers and anticonvulsant medications. A better understanding of the basic pathophysiological mechanisms of migraine and other types of headache has led to the development over the past two decades of more target-specific drugs. Since activation of the trigeminovascular system and neurogenic inflammation are thought to play important roles in migraine pathophysiology, experimental studies modeling those events successfully predicted targets for selective development of pharmacological agents to treat migraine. Basically, there are two fundamental strategies for the treatment of migraine, abortive or preventive, based to a large degree on the frequency of attacks. The triptans, which exhibit potency towards selective serotonin (5-hydroxytryptamine, 5-HT) receptors expressed on trigeminal nerves, remain the most effective drugs for the abortive treatment of migraine. However, numerous preventive medications are currently available that modulate the excitability of the nervous system, particularly the cerebral cortex. In this chapter, the pharmacology of commercially available medications as well as drugs in development that prevent or abort headache attacks will be discussed.

An open pilot study assessing the benefits of quetiapine for the prevention of migraine refractory to the combination of atenolol, nortriptyline, and flunarizine

BACKGROUND

Migraine is a prevalent neurological disorder. Although prevention is the core of treatment for most, some patients are refractory to standard therapies. Accordingly, the aim of this study was to evaluate the use of Quetiapine (QTP) in the preventive treatment of refractory migraine, defined as previous unresponsiveness to the combination of atenolol, nortriptyline, and flunarizine.

METHODS

Thirty-four consecutive patients (30 women and 4 men) with migraine (ICHD-II), fewer than 15 days of headache per month, and not overusing symptomatic medications were studied. All participants had failed to the combination of atenolol (60 mg/day), nortriptyline (25 mg/day), and flunarizine (3 mg/day). Failure was defined as <50% reduction in attack frequency after 10 weeks of treatment. After other medications were discontinued, QTP was initiated at a single daily dose of 25 mg, and then titrated to 75 mg. After 10 weeks, headache frequency, consumption of rescue medications, and adverse events were analyzed.

RESULTS

Twenty-nine patients completed the study. Three patients withdrew and two were lost to follow-up. Among those who completed, 22 (75.9%; 64.7% of the intention-to-treat population) had greater than 50% headache reduction. The mean frequency of migraine days decreased from 10.2 to 6.2 per month. Use of rescue medications decreased from 2.3 to 1.2 days/week. Adverse events were reported by nine (31%) patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Although limited by the open design, this study provides pilot data to support the use of QTP in the preventive treatment of refractory migraine. Controlled studies are necessary to confirm these observations.

Sleep and headache

There is a strong interaction between sleep and headache. Sleep and headache disorders overlap epidemiologically, and share elements of anatomy and physiology. Perhaps as a result, their treatment is often mutually interdependent. Despite this, headache and sleep disorders tend to be treated separately, by different subspecialties of neurology. The headache disorders and their relationship to sleep, the commonalities of headache and sleep pathophysiology, and headache disorders that are particularly susceptible to sleep modulation (and vice versa) are reviewed. Practical management advice for sleep-modulated headaches is provided.

Effects of intravenous adenosine 5'-triphosphate on intraoperative hemodynamics and postoperative pain in patients undergoing major orofacial surgery: a double-blind placebo-controlled study

PURPOSE

We conducted a double-blind placebo-controlled study to investigate the effects of the intraoperative intravenous infusion of adenosine 5'-triphosphate (ATP) on intraoperative hemodynamics and postoperative pain in patients undergoing major orofacial surgery.

METHODS

Thirty patients (age, 16-42 years; 16 males/14 females) scheduled for sagittal split ramus osteotomy were assigned in a double-blind fashion to receive intraoperative intravenous infusion of ATP (n = 15) or saline (n = 15). Anesthesia was induced and maintained with propofol, fentanyl, and vecuronium. Local anesthesia was added for intraoperative analgesia. In the ATP group, ATP was infused at a rate of 160 microg.kg(-1).min(-1) throughout surgery. Postoperative pain was managed with intravenous patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) with morphine. The intensity of postoperative pain was assessed with a verbal numeric rating scale (NRS). Morphine consumption was also assessed.

RESULTS

There were no differences in demographic, anesthetic, and surgical data between the ATP and placebo groups. Intraoperatively, ATP effectively suppressed responses of blood pressure and heart rate to painful surgical stimuli. There were no differences in postoperative NRS scores between the two groups. However, postoperative morphine consumption was significantly less in the ATP group, compared with the placebo group, throughout the 72-h postoperative observation period. Cumulative morphine consumption for 72 h postoperatively was 47% less with ATP, compared with placebo. No adverse effect of ATP was observed.

CONCLUSION

Our data suggest that intraoperative ATP infusion can blunt hemodynamic responses to surgical stimuli and produce prolonged analgesia in patients undergoing major orofacial surgery.

Adenosine receptors and the central nervous system

The adenosine receptors (ARs) in the nervous system act as a kind of "go-between" to regulate the release of neurotransmitters (this includes all known neurotransmitters) and the action of neuromodulators (e.g., neuropeptides, neurotrophic factors). Receptor-receptor interactions and AR-transporter interplay occur as part of the adenosine's attempt to control synaptic transmission. A(2A)ARs are more abundant in the striatum and A(1)ARs in the hippocampus, but both receptors interfere with the efficiency and plasticity-regulated synaptic transmission in most brain areas. The omnipresence of adenosine and A(2A) and A(1) ARs in all nervous system cells (neurons and glia), together with the intensive release of adenosine following insults, makes adenosine a kind of "maestro" of the tripartite synapse in the homeostatic coordination of the brain function. Under physiological conditions, both A(2A) and A(1) ARs play an important role in sleep and arousal, cognition, memory and learning, whereas under pathological conditions (e.g., Parkinson's disease, Alzheimer's disease, amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, stroke, epilepsy, drug addiction, pain, schizophrenia, depression), ARs operate a time/circumstance window where in some circumstances A(1)AR agonists may predominate as early neuroprotectors, and in other circumstances A(2A)AR antagonists may alter the outcomes of some of the pathological deficiencies. In some circumstances, and depending on the therapeutic window, the use of A(2A)AR agonists may be initially beneficial; however, at later time points, the use of A(2A)AR antagonists proved beneficial in several pathologies. Since selective ligands for A(1) and A(2A) ARs are now entering clinical trials, the time has come to determine the role of these receptors in neurological and psychiatric diseases and identify therapies that will alter the outcomes of these diseases, therefore providing a hopeful future for the patients who suffer from these diseases.

Migraine

Migraine is a neurovascular disorder which affects one fifth of the general population. Disability due to migraine is severe and involves patients from infancy through senescence and it is aggravated by the fact there is no complete cure. However, various drugs for the symptomatic or prophylactic treatment of the disease are available. Recently, better knowledge of the neurobiological and pharmacological aspects of a subset of trigeminal primary sensory neurons has provided key information for the development of effective molecules that specifically target the activation of the trigeminovascular system and may represent a significant advancement in the treatment of the disease. These novel antagonists block the receptor for the sensory neuropeptide calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP), which upon release from peripheral terminals of trigeminal perivascular neurons dilates cranial arterial vessels. Whether neurogenic vasodilatation is the major contributing factor to generate the pain and the associated symptoms of the migraine attack or whether other sites of action of CGRP receptor antagonists are responsible for the antimigraine effect of these compounds is the subject of current and intense research.

Is migraine a neuropathic pain syndrome?

The understanding of migraine pathophysiology has evolved from the belief that migraine is a vascular disorder, to evidence that better defines migraine as a neurogenic disorder associated with secondary changes in brain perfusion. There is evidence to suggest that the early phase of migraine pain results from neurogenic inflammation affecting cranial blood vessels and dura. Allodynia, hyperalgesia, and expansion of nociceptive fields occur during most well-established migraine attacks. These clinical features of migraine are evocative of those traditionally associated with neuropathic pain. A hypothesis that defines migraine pain as a unique neuropathic pain disorder can imply the potential for neural plasticity and may provide insight into the mechanisms that underlie the transformation of episodic to chronic forms of migraine. The neuropathic pain model of migraine pathophysiology not only paves the way for mechanism-based treatment strategies that can improve the acute and preventive management of migraine attacks, but also opens the door for the discovery of novel therapeutic targets. It also lends momentum to an understanding of clinically intriguing topics such as opiate-induced hyperalgesia and medication-overuse headache (rebound headache), opioid resistance in the treatment of chronic headache, and disease modification in defending against the potential for migraine transformation.

Current and prospective pharmacological targets in relation to antimigraine action

Migraine is a recurrent incapacitating neurovascular disorder characterized by unilateral and throbbing headaches associated with photophobia, phonophobia, nausea, and vomiting. Current specific drugs used in the acute treatment of migraine interact with vascular receptors, a fact that has raised concerns about their cardiovascular safety. In the past, alpha-adrenoceptor agonists (ergotamine, dihydroergotamine, isometheptene) were used. The last two decades have witnessed the advent of 5-HT(1B/1D) receptor agonists (sumatriptan and second-generation triptans), which have a well-established efficacy in the acute treatment of migraine. Moreover, current prophylactic treatments of migraine include 5-HT(2) receptor antagonists, Ca(2+) channel blockers, and beta-adrenoceptor antagonists. Despite the progress in migraine research and in view of its complex etiology, this disease still remains underdiagnosed, and available therapies are underused. In this review, we have discussed pharmacological targets in migraine, with special emphasis on compounds acting on 5-HT (5-HT(1-7)), adrenergic (alpha(1), alpha(2,) and beta), calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP(1) and CGRP(2)), adenosine (A(1), A(2), and A(3)), glutamate (NMDA, AMPA, kainate, and metabotropic), dopamine, endothelin, and female hormone (estrogen and progesterone) receptors. In addition, we have considered some other targets, including gamma-aminobutyric acid, angiotensin, bradykinin, histamine, and ionotropic receptors, in relation to antimigraine therapy. Finally, the cardiovascular safety of current and prospective antimigraine therapies is touched upon.

Quetiapine for the prevention of migraine refractory to the combination of atenolol + nortriptyline + flunarizine: an open pilot study

BACKGROUND: Migraine is a prevalent neurological disorder. Although prevention is the mainstream treatment, some patients are refractory to standard therapies. AIM: To evaluate the use of quetiapine (QTP) in the preventive treatment of refractory migraine, defined as previous unresponsiveness to the combination atenolol + nortriptyline + flunarizine. METHOD: Thirty-four consecutive patients (30 women and 4 men) with migraine (ICHD-II) and headache attacks on less than 15 days per month not overusing symptomatic medications were studied. The main inclusion criterion was the lack of response (<50% reduction in attack frequency) after ten weeks to the combination of atenolol (60 mg/day) + nortriptyline (25 mg/day) + flunarizine (3 mg/day). The patients started on QTP as the sole treatment in a single daily dose of 25 mg, titrated to 75 mg. After ten weeks, headache frequency, consumption of rescue medications and adverse events were analyzed. RESULTS: Twenty nine patients completed the study. Among completers, 22 (75.9%; 64.7% of the intention-to-treat population) presented >50% headache reduction. The mean frequency of migraine days decreased from 10.2 to 6.2 and the average consumption of rescue medications decreased from 2.3 to 1.2 days/week. Adverse events were reported by 9 (31%) patients. CONCLUSION: Although limited by the open design, this study provides a pilot data to support the use of quetiapine in preventive treatment of refractory migraine.

Caffeine for the prevention and treatment of postdural puncture headache: debunking the myth

OBJECTIVE

Is caffeine effective in preventing and treating postdural puncture headache (PDPH)?

METHODS

The question was addressed with a structured evidence-based clinical neurologic practice review via videoconferencing between 3 academic institutions. Participants included consultant and resident neurologists, clinical epidemiologists, medical librarians, and clinical content experts. A critically appraised topic format was employed, starting with a clinical scenario and structured question. Participant groups at each of the 3 institutions independently devised search strategies, located and compiled the best evidence, performed critical appraisals, synthesized the results, summarized the evidence, provided commentary, and declared bottom-line conclusions.

RESULTS

Three directly relevant randomized controlled trial articles were selected as the best available evidence for the clinical questions. Two investigated caffeine [oral and intravenous (IV)] as PDPH prophylaxis and 1 (oral) as PDPH treatment. One additional quasirandomized trial (IV) and 1 open-label trial (IV) of caffeine for PDPH treatment were located by reviewing bibliographies. Articles describing the pharmacological basis for caffeine therapy were also identified. No valid pharmacological rationale for caffeine as an antinociceptive agent for PDPH exists. The clinical trials are few in number, small in sample size, methodologically weak or flawed, and either demonstrate no effectiveness, contradictory and conflicting results, or invalid answers.

CONCLUSIONS

The wide endorsement for caffeine to prevent and treat PDPH found in textbooks and review articles appears to be unwarranted and insufficiently supported by the available pharmacological and clinical evidence.

Multicentre evaluation of the adenosine agonist GR79236X in patients with dental pain after third molar extraction

BACKGROUND

Adenosine is analgesic in humans, and the selective adenosine A1 receptor agonist GR79236X has significant anti-nociceptive activity in an animal pain model of inflammatory pain.

METHODS

Seventy-nine patients with moderate pain after third molar extraction under general anaesthesia were randomized to receive a 15 min double-blind infusion containing either GR79236X 4 microg kg-1, GR79236X 10 microg kg-1, diclofenac 50 mg, or saline placebo. Rescue analgesia was promptly available to all patients.

RESULTS

Meaningful pain relief (mild or no pain) was attained by 9 (47%) patients in the placebo group, 12 (63%) patients in the GR79236 4 microg kg-1 group, 10 (48%) patients in the 10 microg kg-1 group, and 16 (80%) patients in the diclofenac 50 mg group. Neither dose of GR79236 produced a significant improvement over placebo, but diclofenac was superior to both placebo (P=0.036) and GR79236 10 microg kg-1 (P=0.034). Median times to rescue or additional analgesia were 62, 100, 60, and 363 min for patients receiving placebo, GR79236 4 microg kg-1, 10 microg kg-1, and diclofenac 50 mg, respectively (diclofenac significantly longer than placebo, P=0.002 log-rank test). Pain control was poor in the placebo group and in both GR79236 groups, with between 79 and 86% of patients having good pain control (i.e. mild or no pain) for <20% of the time compared with only 30% of patients who received diclofenac.

CONCLUSION

We found no evidence of efficacy of GR79236 compared with placebo, but the active control diclofenac was effective. It is possible that a higher dose of GR79236 might have been effective or that i.v. administration of this drug does not achieve appropriate concentrations in the brain or peripheral nerves.

New Migraine and Pain Research

An understanding of the pathophysiology and pharmacology of migraine has been driven by astute clinical observations, elegant experimental medicine studies and importantly by the introduction of highly effective selective anti-migraine agents such as the Triptan 5-HT(1B/1D) agonists. New investigational migraine therapies such CGRP antagonists target key components of the trigeminal sensory neuroinflammatory response and show promise for the future. Cutting edge molecular profiling studies looking at gene expression during chronic pain are now being used to reveal the cell biology of pain and new potential therapeutic targets. Translational neuroimaging research can link the laboratory and the clinic and is now being used to help understand the neural systems biology of migraine. Research into migraine has generated sophisticated hypotheses that encompass primary CNS dysfunction, trigeminovascular activation, pain perception and activation of associated neural circuits involved in affective functions providing a rich framework within which to design and test future migraine treatment strategies.

New and future migraine therapy

Modern neuroscience advanced our understanding of putative migraine mechanisms, which led to improved therapeutics. Indeed, mechanism-based acute migraine therapy gained steam in the early 1990s after the introduction of the triptans (5-HT1B,D agonists). Post-triptans, novel targets such as calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) antagonists, inhibitors of excitatory glutamatergic receptors, and nitric oxide synthase (NOS) inhibitors are leading the pack in this exploding field of discovery research. In contrast, novel therapeutic targets for migraine prevention are lacking despite a hugely unmet need. To date, migraine prophylactic drugs are advanced based on expanded indications for already approved pharmaceuticals (e.g., topiramate, valproate, propranolol, and timolol). An improved understanding of the predisposition to an attack, genomic discoveries, valid and reliable biomarkers and surrogates, and predictive preclinical models likely will unravel the neuronal substrates for central hyperexcitability and nociceptive dysmodulation, hopefully leading us to better mechanism-based targets for prevention, and ultimately yielding drugs with optimal therapeutic ratios or indices.

The preventive treatment of migraine

BACKGROUND

Migraine is a common, chronic, and disabling disorder. The treatment of migraine includes a combination of nonpharmacologic and pharmacologic techniques. Pharmacologic approaches are subdivided in preventive therapies and acute care.

REVIEW SUMMARY

In this review article, we review the current approaches to the preventive treatment of migraine. Preventive treatment should be initiated in those with frequent or disabling headaches. The goals include (1) reducing attack frequency, intensity, and duration; (2) minimizing headache-related disability; (3) improving health-related quality of life; (4) avoiding headache escalation and medication misuse. In this article, we also discuss the principles of migraine prevention, as well as drugs available for this goal. We divide preventive medications on those of common use, nutraceutical compounds, and medications less frequently used. We close by briefly discussing some in-development potential preventive drugs.

CONCLUSION

Preventive therapies are well suitable for migraineurs with attack-related disability despite appropriate acute care.

Future pharmacologic targets for acute and preventive treatments of migraine

Advances in investigative research (e.g., functional magnetic resonance imaging) have made it possible to study putative migraine processes and better understand the pathophysiology of the disorder. Consequently, the apparent opposing vascular and neuronal theories of migraine are now reconciled into a neurovascular hypothesis that pieces together migrainous events and allows us to better target such events in the hope of providing safe and effective therapies. Parallel discoveries in the fields of pharmacology, physiology, genetics and other biomedical disciplines will lead to the development of optimal migraine therapeutics. Such discoveries have already yielded some major enhancement in acute migraine treatment with the development of sumatriptan (Imitrex, GlaxoSmithKline) and other triptans and the trajectory is likely to be exponential. Novel targets, such as calcitonin gene-related peptide antagonists and inhibitors of excitatory glutamatergic receptors, are leading the pack but many other promising targets are in development. The post-sumatriptan decades will witness treatment strategies that will improve the therapeutic index of acute therapies and others which will effectively and safely prevent migraine attacks.

Migraine: new treatment options from molecular biology

Migraine is a common, disabling, multifactorial, episodic neurovascular disorder of largely unknown etiology. The disease is typically characterized by recurrent attacks of headaches and associated autonomic and neurologic symptoms. Current acute and prophylactic treatment options are far from optimal and in many cases, empirically chosen. Clearly, improved treatment is desperately needed. New drug targets may emerge from molecular research as the unravelling of the molecular basis of migraine should improve our understanding of the disease, notably why patients experience attacks so frequently. The first two migraine genes discovered in families with hemiplegic migraine encode ion transporters, emphasising that dysfunction of ion transport may be an important factor in migraine. Therefore, ion transporters can be considered as novel targets for the development of future antimigraine drugs. Molecular biologic research will increasingly become important in understanding the pathophysiology of migraine and in identifying potential molecular targets for novel treatments.

Eletriptan in migraine

Migraine is a highly prevalent, chronic and disabling illness in which the gap between practice guideline recommendations and actual clinical practice remains wide. Eletriptan, similar to other triptans, is a potent 5-HT(1B/1D) receptor agonist with a high selectivity for cranial versus coronary artery constriction and favorable pharmacokinetic profile. An extensive program of double-blind, placebo-controlled, head-to-head comparator trials has demonstrated the superior efficacy of eletriptan compared with the combination of ergotamine and caffeine, and selected oral triptans for the acute treatment of migraine. Eletriptans tolerability profile makes it a good choice as a first-line treatment of migraine. An early treatment study suggests that treatment of mild headache is associated with unusually high sustained pain-free rates and a tolerability profile that is equivalent to placebo.

New targets in acute migraine treatment

Migraine is a common and highly disabling neurological problem, whose acute treatment was revolutionized by the triptans, serotonin 5-HT1B/1D receptor agonists. Some patients do not respond to triptans, while others are not suitable for them largely because of contraindications based on vascular disease. The exploration of nonvasoconstrictor treatments for acute migraine offers the prospect of dramatic improvements in patient care, as well as important insights into the mechanisms of migraine. Possibilities for such developments include, calcitonin gene-related peptide receptor antagonists, serotonin 5-HT1F and 5-HT1D receptor agonists, glutamate excitatory amino acid receptor antagonists, nitric oxide synthase inhibitors and adenosine A1 receptor agonists. Taken together, the future for migraine and affected patients is bright and promising.