Network connectivity predicts effectiveness of responsive neurostimulation in focal epilepsy

Circadian changes in aperiodic activity are correlated with seizure reduction in patients with mesial temporal lobe epilepsy treated with responsive neurostimulation

OBJECTIVES

Responsive neurostimulation (RNS) is an established therapy for drug-resistant epilepsy that delivers direct electrical brain stimulation in response to detected epileptiform activity. However, despite an overall reduction in seizure frequency, clinical outcomes are variable, and few patients become seizure-free. The aim of this retrospective study was to evaluate aperiodic electrophysiological activity, associated with excitation/inhibition balance, as a novel electrographic biomarker of seizure reduction to aid early prognostication of the clinical response to RNS.

METHODS

We identified patients with intractable mesial temporal lobe epilepsy who were implanted with the RNS System between 2015 and 2021 at the University of Utah. We parameterized the neural power spectra from intracranial RNS System recordings during the first 3 months following implantation into aperiodic and periodic components. We then correlated circadian changes in aperiodic and periodic parameters of baseline neural recordings with seizure reduction at the most recent follow-up.

RESULTS

Seizure reduction was correlated significantly with a patient's average change in the day/night aperiodic exponent (r = .50, p = .016, n = 23 patients) and oscillatory alpha power (r = .45, p = .042, n = 23 patients) across patients for baseline neural recordings. The aperiodic exponent reached its maximum during nighttime hours (12 a.m. to 6 a.m.) for most responders (i.e., patients with at least a 50% reduction in seizures).

SIGNIFICANCE

These findings suggest that circadian modulation of baseline broadband activity is a biomarker of response to RNS early during therapy. This marker has the potential to identify patients who are likely to respond to mesial temporal RNS. Furthermore, we propose that less day/night modulation of the aperiodic exponent may be related to dysfunction in excitation/inhibition balance and its interconnected role in epilepsy, sleep, and memory.

Neurostimulation targeting the epileptic focus: Current understanding and perspectives for treatment

For the one third of people with epilepsy whose seizures are not controlled with medications, targeting the seizure focus with neurostimulation can be an effective therapeutic strategy. In this focused review, we summarize a discussion of targeted neurostimulation modalities during a workshop held in Frankfurt, Germany in September 2023. Topics covered include: available devices for seizure focus stimulation; alternating current (AC) and direct current (DC) stimulation to reduce focal cortical excitability; modeling approaches to simulate DC stimulation; reconciling the efficacy of focal stimulation with the network theory of epilepsy; and the emerging concept of 'neurostimulation zones,' which are defined as cortical regions where focal stimulation is most effective for reducing seizures and which may or may not directly involve the seizure onset zone. By combining experimental data, modeling results, and clinical outcome analysis, rational selection of target regions and stimulation parameters is increasingly feasible, paving the way for a broader use of neurostimulation for epilepsy in the future.

Effective connectivity relates seizure outcome to electrode placement in responsive neurostimulation

Responsive neurostimulation is a closed-loop neuromodulation therapy for drug resistant focal epilepsy. Responsive neurostimulation electrodes are placed near ictal onset zones so as to enable detection of epileptiform activity and deliver electrical stimulation. There is no standard approach for determining the optimal placement of responsive neurostimulation electrodes. Clinicians make this determination based on presurgical tests, such as MRI, EEG, magnetoencephalography, ictal single-photon emission computed tomography and intracranial EEG. Currently functional connectivity measures are not being used in determining the placement of responsive neurostimulation electrodes. Cortico-cortical evoked potentials are a measure of effective functional connectivity. Cortico-cortical evoked potentials are generated by direct single-pulse electrical stimulation and can be used to investigate cortico-cortical connections in vivo. We hypothesized that the presence of high amplitude cortico-cortical evoked potentials, recorded during intracranial EEG monitoring, near the eventual responsive neurostimulation contact sites is predictive of better outcomes from its therapy. We retrospectively reviewed 12 patients in whom cortico-cortical evoked potentials were obtained during stereoelectroencephalography evaluation and subsequently underwent responsive neurostimulation therapy. We studied the relationship between cortico-cortical evoked potentials, the eventual responsive neurostimulation electrode locations and seizure reduction. Directional connectivity indicated by cortico-cortical evoked potentials can categorize stereoelectroencephalography electrodes as either receiver nodes/in-degree (an area of greater inward connectivity) or projection nodes/out-degree (greater outward connectivity). The follow-up period for seizure reduction ranged from 1.3-4.8 years (median 2.7) after responsive neurostimulation therapy started. Stereoelectroencephalography electrodes closest to the eventual responsive neurostimulation contact site tended to show larger in-degree cortico-cortical evoked potentials, especially for the early latency cortico-cortical evoked potentials period (10-60 ms period) in six out of 12 patients. Stereoelectroencephalography electrodes closest to the responsive neurostimulation contacts (≤5 mm) also had greater significant out-degree in the early cortico-cortical evoked potentials latency period than those further away (≥10 mm) (P < 0.05). Additionally, significant correlation was noted between in-degree cortico-cortical evoked potentials and greater seizure reduction with responsive neurostimulation therapy at its most effective period (P < 0.05). These findings suggest that functional connectivity determined by cortico-cortical evoked potentials may provide additional information that could help guide the optimal placement of responsive neurostimulation electrodes.

The Temporal Lobe Club: Newer Approaches to Treat Temporal Lobe Epilepsy

This brief review summarizes presentations at the Temporal Lobe Club Special Interest Group session held in December 2022 at the American Epilepsy Society meeting. The session addressed newer methods to treat temporal epilepsy, including methods currently in clinical use and techniques under investigation. Brief summaries are provided for each of 4 lectures. Dr Chengyuan Wu discussed ablative techniques such as laser interstitial thermal ablation, radiofrequency ablation, focused ultrasound; Dr Joon Kang reviewed neuromodulation techniques including electrical stimulation and focused ultrasound; Dr Julia Makhalova discussed network effects of the aforementioned techniques; and Dr Derek Southwell reviewed inhibitory interneuron transplantation. These summaries are intended to provide a brief overview and references are provided for the reader to learn more about each topic.

Utility of Chronic Intracranial Electroencephalography in Responsive Neurostimulation Therapy

Responsive neurostimulation (RNS) therapy is an effective treatment for reducing seizures in some patients with focal epilepsy. Utilizing a chronically implanted device, RNS involves monitoring brain activity signals for user-defined patterns of seizure activity and delivering electrical stimulation in response. Devices store chronic data including counts of detected activity patterns and brief recordings of intracranial electroencephalography signals. Data platforms for reviewing stored chronic data retrospectively may be used to evaluate therapy performance and to fine-tune detection and stimulation settings. New frontiers in RNS research can leverage raw chronic data to reverse engineer neurostimulation mechanisms and improve therapy effectiveness.

Unearthing the mechanisms of responsive neurostimulation for epilepsy

Responsive neurostimulation (RNS) is an effective therapy for people with drug-resistant focal epilepsy. In clinical trials, RNS therapy results in a meaningful reduction in median seizure frequency, but the response is highly variable across individuals, with many receiving minimal or no benefit. Understanding why this variability occurs will help improve use of RNS therapy. Here we advocate for a reexamination of the assumptions made about how RNS reduces seizures. This is now possible due to large patient cohorts having used this device, some long-term. Two foundational assumptions have been that the device's intracranial leads should target the seizure focus/foci directly, and that stimulation should be triggered only in response to detected epileptiform activity. Recent studies have called into question both hypotheses. Here, we discuss these exciting new studies and suggest future approaches to patient selection, lead placement, and device programming that could improve clinical outcomes.

Landscape and future directions of machine learning applications in closed-loop brain stimulation

Brain stimulation (BStim) encompasses multiple modalities (e.g., deep brain stimulation, responsive neurostimulation) that utilize electrodes implanted in deep brain structures to treat neurological disorders. Currently, BStim is primarily used to treat movement disorders such as Parkinson's, though indications are expanding to include neuropsychiatric disorders like depression and schizophrenia. Traditional BStim systems are "open-loop" and deliver constant electrical stimulation based on manually-determined parameters. Advancements in BStim have enabled development of "closed-loop" systems that analyze neural biomarkers (e.g., local field potentials in the sub-thalamic nucleus) and adjust electrical modulation in a dynamic, patient-specific, and energy efficient manner. These closed-loop systems enable real-time, context-specific stimulation adjustment to reduce symptom burden. Machine learning (ML) has emerged as a vital component in designing these closed-loop systems as ML models can predict / identify presence of disease symptoms based on neural activity and adaptively learn to modulate stimulation. We queried the US National Library of Medicine PubMed database to understand the role of ML in developing closed-loop BStim systems to treat epilepsy, movement disorders, and neuropsychiatric disorders. Both neural and non-neural network ML algorithms have successfully been leveraged to create closed-loop systems that perform comparably to open-loop systems. For disorders in which the underlying neural pathophysiology is relatively well understood (e.g., Parkinson's, essential tremor), most work has involved refining ML models that can classify neural signals as aberrant or normal. The same is seen for epilepsy, where most current research has focused on identifying optimal ML model design and integrating closed-loop systems into existing devices. For neuropsychiatric disorders, where the underlying pathologic neural circuitry is still being investigated, research is focused on identifying biomarkers (e.g., local field potentials from brain nuclei) that ML models can use to identify onset of symptoms and stratify severity of disease.

Epileptic Tissue Localization through Skewness-Based Functional Connectivity in the High-Frequency Band of Intracranial EEG

Functional connectivity analysis of intracranial electroencephalography (iEEG) plays an important role in understanding the mechanism of epilepsy and seizure dynamics. However, existing connectivity analysis is only suitable for low-frequency bands below 80 Hz. High-frequency oscillations (HFOs) and high-frequency activity (HFA) in the high-frequency band (80-500 Hz) are thought to be specific biomarkers in epileptic tissue localization. However, the transience in duration and variability of occurrence time and amplitudes of these events pose a challenge for conducting effective connectivity analysis. To deal with this problem, we proposed skewness-based functional connectivity (SFC) in the high-frequency band and explored its utility in epileptic tissue localization and surgical outcome evaluation. SFC comprises three main steps. The first step is the quantitative measurement of amplitude distribution asymmetry between HFOs/HFA and baseline activity. The second step is functional network construction on the basis of rank correlation of asymmetry across time. The third step is connectivity strength extraction from the functional network. Experiments were conducted in two separate datasets which consist of iEEG recordings from 59 patients with drug-resistant epilepsy. Significant difference (p<0.001) in connectivity strength was found between epileptic and non-epileptic tissue. Results were quantified via the receiver operating characteristic curve and the area under the curve (AUC). Compared with low-frequency bands, SFC demonstrated superior performance. With respect to pooled and individual epileptic tissue localization for seizure-free patients, AUCs were 0.66 (95% confidence interval (CI): 0.63-0.69) and (0.63 95% CI 0.56-0.71), respectively. For surgical outcome classification, the AUC was 0.75 (95% CI 0.59-0.85). Therefore, SFC can act as a promising assessment tool in characterizing the epileptic network and potentially provide better treatment options for patients with drug-resistant epilepsy.

Responsive Neurostimulation for Seizure Control: Current Status and Future Directions

Electrocorticography (ECoG) data are commonly obtained during drug-resistant epilepsy (DRE) workup, in which subdural grids and stereotaxic depth electrodes are placed on the cortex for weeks at a time, with the goal of elucidating seizure origination. ECoG data can also be recorded from neuromodulatory devices, such as responsive neurostimulation (RNS), which involves the placement of electrodes deep in the brain. Of the neuromodulatory devices, RNS is the first to use recorded ECoG data to direct the delivery of electrical stimulation in order to control seizures. In this review, we first introduced the clinical management for epilepsy, and discussed the steps from seizure onset to surgical intervention. We then reviewed studies discussing the emergence and therapeutic mechanism behind RNS, and discussed why RNS may be underperforming despite an improved seizure detection mechanism. We discussed the potential utility of incorporating machine learning techniques to improve seizure detection in RNS, and the necessity to change RNS targets for stimulation, in order to account for the network theory of epilepsy. We concluded by commenting on the current and future status of neuromodulation in managing epilepsy, and the role of predictive algorithms to improve outcomes.

Prognostication of responsive neurostimulation system responsiveness using presurgical magnetoencephalography

This scientific commentary refers to 'Network connectivity predicts effectiveness of responsive neurostimulation in focal epilepsy', by Fan et al. (https://doi.org/10.1093/braincomms/fcac104).