1
|
Sellers KK, Cohen JL, Khambhati AN, Fan JM, Lee AM, Chang EF, Krystal AD. Closed-loop neurostimulation for the treatment of psychiatric disorders. Neuropsychopharmacology 2024; 49:163-178. [PMID: 37369777 PMCID: PMC10700557 DOI: 10.1038/s41386-023-01631-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/07/2023] [Revised: 05/31/2023] [Accepted: 06/02/2023] [Indexed: 06/29/2023]
Abstract
Despite increasing prevalence and huge personal and societal burden, psychiatric diseases still lack treatments which can control symptoms for a large fraction of patients. Increasing insight into the neurobiology underlying these diseases has demonstrated wide-ranging aberrant activity and functioning in multiple brain circuits and networks. Together with varied presentation and symptoms, this makes one-size-fits-all treatment a challenge. There has been a resurgence of interest in the use of neurostimulation as a treatment for psychiatric diseases. Initial studies using continuous open-loop stimulation, in which clinicians adjusted stimulation parameters during patient visits, showed promise but also mixed results. Given the periodic nature and fluctuations of symptoms often observed in psychiatric illnesses, the use of device-driven closed-loop stimulation may provide more effective therapy. The use of a biomarker, which is correlated with specific symptoms, to deliver stimulation only during symptomatic periods allows for the personalized therapy needed for such heterogeneous disorders. Here, we provide the reader with background motivating the use of closed-loop neurostimulation for the treatment of psychiatric disorders. We review foundational studies of open- and closed-loop neurostimulation for neuropsychiatric indications, focusing on deep brain stimulation, and discuss key considerations when designing and implementing closed-loop neurostimulation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kristin K Sellers
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA
- Weill Institute for Neurosciences, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Joshua L Cohen
- Weill Institute for Neurosciences, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Ankit N Khambhati
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA
- Weill Institute for Neurosciences, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Joline M Fan
- Weill Institute for Neurosciences, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA
- Department of Neurology, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - A Moses Lee
- Weill Institute for Neurosciences, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Edward F Chang
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA
- Weill Institute for Neurosciences, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Andrew D Krystal
- Weill Institute for Neurosciences, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA.
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Khambhati AN. Utility of Chronic Intracranial Electroencephalography in Responsive Neurostimulation Therapy. Neurosurg Clin N Am 2024; 35:125-133. [PMID: 38000836 DOI: 10.1016/j.nec.2023.09.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2023]
Abstract
Responsive neurostimulation (RNS) therapy is an effective treatment for reducing seizures in some patients with focal epilepsy. Utilizing a chronically implanted device, RNS involves monitoring brain activity signals for user-defined patterns of seizure activity and delivering electrical stimulation in response. Devices store chronic data including counts of detected activity patterns and brief recordings of intracranial electroencephalography signals. Data platforms for reviewing stored chronic data retrospectively may be used to evaluate therapy performance and to fine-tune detection and stimulation settings. New frontiers in RNS research can leverage raw chronic data to reverse engineer neurostimulation mechanisms and improve therapy effectiveness.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ankit N Khambhati
- Department of Neurosurgery, Weill Institute for Neurosciences, University of California, San Francisco, Joan and Sanford I. Weill Neurosciences Building, 1651 4th Street, 671C, San Francisco, CA 94158, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Sellers KK, Khambhati AN, Stapper N, Fan JM, Rao VR, Scangos KW, Chang EF, Krystal AD. Closed-Loop Neurostimulation for Biomarker-Driven, Personalized Treatment of Major Depressive Disorder. J Vis Exp 2023. [PMID: 37486114 DOI: 10.3791/65177] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 07/25/2023] Open
Abstract
Deep brain stimulation involves the administration of electrical stimulation to targeted brain regions for therapeutic benefit. In the context of major depressive disorder (MDD), most studies to date have administered continuous or open-loop stimulation with promising but mixed results. One factor contributing to these mixed results may stem from when the stimulation is applied. Stimulation administration specific to high-symptom states in a personalized and responsive manner may be more effective at reducing symptoms compared to continuous stimulation and may avoid diminished therapeutic effects related to habituation. Additionally, a lower total duration of stimulation per day is advantageous for reducing device energy consumption. This protocol describes an experimental workflow using a chronically implanted neurostimulation device to achieve closed-loop stimulation for individuals with treatment-refractory MDD. This paradigm hinges on determining a patient-specific neural biomarker that is related to states of high symptoms and programming the device detectors, such that stimulation is triggered by this read-out of symptom state. The described procedures include how to obtain neural recordings concurrent with patient symptom reports, how to use these data in a state-space model approach to differentiate low- and high-symptom states and corresponding neural features, and how to subsequently program and tune the device to deliver closed-loop stimulation therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kristin K Sellers
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of California, San Francisco; Weill Institute for Neurosciences, University of California, San Francisco;
| | - Ankit N Khambhati
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of California, San Francisco; Weill Institute for Neurosciences, University of California, San Francisco
| | - Noah Stapper
- Weill Institute for Neurosciences, University of California, San Francisco; Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of California, San Francisco
| | - Joline M Fan
- Weill Institute for Neurosciences, University of California, San Francisco; Department of Neurology, University of California, San Francisco
| | - Vikram R Rao
- Weill Institute for Neurosciences, University of California, San Francisco; Department of Neurology, University of California, San Francisco
| | - Katherine W Scangos
- Weill Institute for Neurosciences, University of California, San Francisco; Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of California, San Francisco
| | - Edward F Chang
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of California, San Francisco; Weill Institute for Neurosciences, University of California, San Francisco
| | - Andrew D Krystal
- Weill Institute for Neurosciences, University of California, San Francisco; Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of California, San Francisco
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Fan JM, Lee AM, Sellers KK, Woodworth K, Makhoul GS, Liu TX, Henderson C, Astudillo Maya DA, Martinez R, Zamanian H, Speidel BA, Khambhati AN, Rao VR, Sugrue LP, Scangos KW, Chang EF, Krystal AD. Intracranial electrical stimulation of corticolimbic sites modulates arousal in humans. Brain Stimul 2023; 16:1072-1082. [PMID: 37385540 PMCID: PMC10634663 DOI: 10.1016/j.brs.2023.06.017] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/31/2023] [Revised: 06/23/2023] [Accepted: 06/26/2023] [Indexed: 07/01/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Humans routinely shift their sleepiness and wakefulness levels in response to emotional factors. The diversity of emotional factors that modulates sleep-wake levels suggests that the ascending arousal network may be intimately linked with networks that mediate mood. Indeed, while animal studies have identified select limbic structures that play a role in sleep-wake regulation, the breadth of corticolimbic structures that directly modulates arousal in humans remains unknown. OBJECTIVE We investigated whether select regional activation of the corticolimbic network through direct electrical stimulation can modulate sleep-wake levels in humans, as measured by subjective experience and behavior. METHODS We performed intensive inpatient stimulation mapping in two human participants with treatment resistant depression, who underwent intracranial implantation with multi-site, bilateral depth electrodes. Stimulation responses of sleep-wake levels were measured by subjective surveys (i.e. Stanford Sleepiness Scale and visual-analog scale of energy) and a behavioral arousal score. Biomarker analyses of sleep-wake levels were performed by assessing spectral power features of resting-state electrophysiology. RESULTS Our findings demonstrated three regions whereby direct stimulation modulated arousal, including the orbitofrontal cortex (OFC), subgenual cingulate (SGC), and, most robustly, ventral capsule (VC). Modulation of sleep-wake levels was frequency-specific: 100Hz OFC, SGC, and VC stimulation promoted wakefulness, whereas 1Hz OFC stimulation increased sleepiness. Sleep-wake levels were correlated with gamma activity across broad brain regions. CONCLUSIONS Our findings provide evidence for the overlapping circuitry between arousal and mood regulation in humans. Furthermore, our findings open the door to new treatment targets and the consideration of therapeutic neurostimulation for sleep-wake disorders.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joline M Fan
- Department of Neurology, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA; Weill Institute for Neurosciences, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA.
| | - A Moses Lee
- Weill Institute for Neurosciences, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA; Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Kristin K Sellers
- Weill Institute for Neurosciences, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA; Department of Neurosurgery, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Kai Woodworth
- Weill Institute for Neurosciences, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA; Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Ghassan S Makhoul
- Weill Institute for Neurosciences, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA; Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Tony X Liu
- Weill Institute for Neurosciences, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA; Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Catherine Henderson
- Weill Institute for Neurosciences, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA; Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Daniela A Astudillo Maya
- Weill Institute for Neurosciences, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA; Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Rebecca Martinez
- Weill Institute for Neurosciences, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA; Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Hashem Zamanian
- Weill Institute for Neurosciences, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA; Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Benjamin A Speidel
- Department of Neurology, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA; Weill Institute for Neurosciences, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Ankit N Khambhati
- Weill Institute for Neurosciences, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA; Department of Neurosurgery, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Vikram R Rao
- Department of Neurology, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA; Weill Institute for Neurosciences, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Leo P Sugrue
- Weill Institute for Neurosciences, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA; Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA; Department of Radiology, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Katherine W Scangos
- Weill Institute for Neurosciences, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA; Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Edward F Chang
- Weill Institute for Neurosciences, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA; Department of Neurosurgery, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Andrew D Krystal
- Weill Institute for Neurosciences, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA; Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Sellers KK, Stapper N, Astudillo Maya DA, Henderson C, Khambhati AN, Fan JM, Rao VR, Scangos KW, Chang EF, Krystal AD. Changes in intracranial neurophysiology associated with acute COVID-19 infection. Clin Neurophysiol 2023; 148:29-31. [PMID: 36791656 PMCID: PMC9896881 DOI: 10.1016/j.clinph.2023.01.012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/26/2023] [Accepted: 01/28/2023] [Indexed: 02/05/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Kristin K Sellers
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA; Weill Institute for Neurosciences, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA.
| | - Noah Stapper
- Weill Institute for Neurosciences, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA; Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Daniela A Astudillo Maya
- Weill Institute for Neurosciences, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA; Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Catherine Henderson
- Weill Institute for Neurosciences, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA; Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Ankit N Khambhati
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA; Weill Institute for Neurosciences, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Joline M Fan
- Weill Institute for Neurosciences, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA; Department of Neurology, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Vikram R Rao
- Weill Institute for Neurosciences, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA; Department of Neurology, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Katherine W Scangos
- Weill Institute for Neurosciences, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA; Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Edward F Chang
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA; Weill Institute for Neurosciences, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Andrew D Krystal
- Weill Institute for Neurosciences, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA; Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Fan JM, Khambhati AN, Sellers KK, Stapper N, Maya DA, Kunwar E, Henderson C, Sugrue LP, Scangos KW, Chang EF, Rao VR, Krystal AD. Epileptiform discharges triggered with direct electrical stimulation for treatment-resistant depression: Factors that modulate risk and treatment considerations. Brain Stimul 2023; 16:462-465. [PMID: 36773780 PMCID: PMC10627048 DOI: 10.1016/j.brs.2023.02.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/01/2022] [Accepted: 02/05/2023] [Indexed: 02/11/2023] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Joline M Fan
- Department of Neurology, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA; Weill Institute for Neurosciences, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA.
| | - Ankit N Khambhati
- Weill Institute for Neurosciences, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA; Department of Neurosurgery, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Kristin K Sellers
- Weill Institute for Neurosciences, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA; Department of Neurosurgery, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Noah Stapper
- Department of Psychiatry, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | | | - Elysha Kunwar
- Department of Psychiatry, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | | | - Leo P Sugrue
- Weill Institute for Neurosciences, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA; Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Katherine W Scangos
- Weill Institute for Neurosciences, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA; Department of Psychiatry, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Edward F Chang
- Weill Institute for Neurosciences, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA; Department of Neurosurgery, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Vikram R Rao
- Department of Neurology, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA; Weill Institute for Neurosciences, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Andrew D Krystal
- Weill Institute for Neurosciences, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA; Department of Psychiatry, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Bijanzadeh M, Khambhati AN, Desai M, Wallace DL, Shafi A, Dawes HE, Sturm VE, Chang EF. Decoding naturalistic affective behaviour from spectro-spatial features in multiday human iEEG. Nat Hum Behav 2022; 6:823-836. [PMID: 35273355 DOI: 10.1038/s41562-022-01310-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/28/2021] [Accepted: 01/18/2022] [Indexed: 02/04/2023]
Abstract
The neurological basis of affective behaviours in everyday life is not well understood. We obtained continuous intracranial electroencephalography recordings from the human mesolimbic network in 11 participants with epilepsy and hand-annotated spontaneous behaviours from 116 h of multiday video recordings. In individual participants, binary random forest models decoded affective behaviours from neutral behaviours with up to 93% accuracy. Both positive and negative affective behaviours were associated with increased high-frequency and decreased low-frequency activity across the mesolimbic network. The insula, amygdala, hippocampus and anterior cingulate cortex made stronger contributions to affective behaviours than the orbitofrontal cortex, but the insula and anterior cingulate cortex were most critical for differentiating behaviours with observable affect from those without. In a subset of participants (N = 3), multiclass decoders distinguished amongst the positive, negative and neutral behaviours. These results suggest that spectro-spatial features of brain activity in the mesolimbic network are associated with affective behaviours of everyday life.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maryam Bijanzadeh
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Ankit N Khambhati
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Maansi Desai
- Department of Communication Sciences and Disorders, Moody College of Communication, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX, USA
| | - Deanna L Wallace
- Department of Mechanical Engineering, Psychology and Neurology, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX, USA
| | - Alia Shafi
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Heather E Dawes
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Virginia E Sturm
- Department of Neurology, UCSF Weill Institute for Neurosciences, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Edward F Chang
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Scheid BH, Bernabei JM, Khambhati AN, Mouchtaris S, Jeschke J, Bassett DS, Becker D, Davis KA, Lucas T, Doyle W, Chang EF, Friedman D, Rao VR, Litt B. Intracranial electroencephalographic biomarker predicts effective responsive neurostimulation for epilepsy prior to treatment. Epilepsia 2022; 63:652-662. [PMID: 34997577 PMCID: PMC9887634 DOI: 10.1111/epi.17163] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/07/2021] [Revised: 11/22/2021] [Accepted: 12/27/2021] [Indexed: 02/03/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Despite the overall success of responsive neurostimulation (RNS) therapy for drug-resistant focal epilepsy, clinical outcomes in individuals vary significantly and are hard to predict. Biomarkers that indicate the clinical efficacy of RNS-ideally before device implantation-are critically needed, but challenges include the intrinsic heterogeneity of the RNS patient population and variability in clinical management across epilepsy centers. The aim of this study is to use a multicenter dataset to evaluate a candidate biomarker from intracranial electroencephalographic (iEEG) recordings that predicts clinical outcome with subsequent RNS therapy. METHODS We assembled a federated dataset of iEEG recordings, collected prior to RNS implantation, from a retrospective cohort of 30 patients across three major epilepsy centers. Using ictal iEEG recordings, each center independently calculated network synchronizability, a candidate biomarker indicating the susceptibility of epileptic brain networks to RNS therapy. RESULTS Ictal measures of synchronizability in the high-γ band (95-105 Hz) significantly distinguish between good and poor RNS responders after at least 3 years of therapy under the current RNS therapy guidelines (area under the curve = .83). Additionally, ictal high-γ synchronizability is inversely associated with the degree of therapeutic response. SIGNIFICANCE This study provides a proof-of-concept roadmap for collaborative biomarker evaluation in federated data, where practical considerations impede full data sharing across centers. Our results suggest that network synchronizability can help predict therapeutic response to RNS therapy. With further validation, this biomarker could facilitate patient selection and help avert a costly, invasive intervention in patients who are unlikely to benefit.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Brittany H. Scheid
- Department of Bioengineering, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA,Center for Neuroengineering and Therapeutics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - John M. Bernabei
- Department of Bioengineering, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA,Center for Neuroengineering and Therapeutics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Ankit N. Khambhati
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA,Department of Neurology and Weill Institute for Neurosciences, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA
| | - Sofia Mouchtaris
- Department of Bioengineering, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA,Center for Neuroengineering and Therapeutics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Jay Jeschke
- Comprehensive Epilepsy Center, NYU Langone Health, New York, New York, USA
| | - Dani S. Bassett
- Department of Bioengineering, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA,Department of Neurology, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA,Department of Physics and Astronomy, College of Arts and Sciences, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA,Department of Electrical and Systems Engineering, School of Engineering and Applied Science, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA,Department of Psychiatry, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA,Santa Fe Institute, Santa Fe, New Mexico, USA
| | - Danielle Becker
- Center for Neuroengineering and Therapeutics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA,Department of Neurology, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Kathryn A. Davis
- Department of Bioengineering, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA,Center for Neuroengineering and Therapeutics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA,Department of Neurology, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Timothy Lucas
- Center for Neuroengineering and Therapeutics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA,Department of Neurosurgery, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Werner Doyle
- Department of Neurosurgery, NYU Langone, New York, New York, USA
| | - Edward F. Chang
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA,Department of Neurology and Weill Institute for Neurosciences, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA
| | - Daniel Friedman
- Comprehensive Epilepsy Center, NYU Langone Health, New York, New York, USA,Department of Neurology, NYU Langone, New York, New York, USA
| | - Vikram R. Rao
- Department of Neurology, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA
| | - Brian Litt
- Department of Bioengineering, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA,Center for Neuroengineering and Therapeutics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA,Department of Neurology, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Scangos KW, Khambhati AN, Daly PM, Owen LW, Manning JR, Ambrose JB, Austin E, Dawes HE, Krystal AD, Chang EF. Distributed Subnetworks of Depression Defined by Direct Intracranial Neurophysiology. Front Hum Neurosci 2021; 15:746499. [PMID: 34744662 PMCID: PMC8566975 DOI: 10.3389/fnhum.2021.746499] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/23/2021] [Accepted: 09/02/2021] [Indexed: 12/30/2022] Open
Abstract
Major depressive disorder is a common and disabling disorder with high rates of treatment resistance. Evidence suggests it is characterized by distributed network dysfunction that may be variable across patients, challenging the identification of quantitative biological substrates. We carried out this study to determine whether application of a novel computational approach to a large sample of high spatiotemporal resolution direct neural recordings in humans could unlock the functional organization and coordinated activity patterns of depression networks. This group level analysis of depression networks from heterogenous intracranial recordings was possible due to application of a correlational model-based method for inferring whole-brain neural activity. We then applied a network framework to discover brain dynamics across this model that could classify depression. We found a highly distributed pattern of neural activity and connectivity across cortical and subcortical structures that was present in the majority of depressed subjects. Furthermore, we found that this depression signature consisted of two subnetworks across individuals. The first was characterized by left temporal lobe hypoconnectivity and pathological beta activity. The second was characterized by a hypoactive, but hyperconnected left frontal cortex. These findings have applications toward personalization of therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Katherine Wilson Scangos
- Department of Psychiatry, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, United States
- Weill Institute for Neurosciences, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, United States
| | - Ankit N. Khambhati
- Weill Institute for Neurosciences, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, United States
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, United States
| | - Patrick M. Daly
- Department of Psychiatry, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, United States
- Weill Institute for Neurosciences, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, United States
| | - Lucy W. Owen
- Department of Psychological and Brain Sciences, Dartmouth College, Hanover, NH, United States
| | - Jeremy R. Manning
- Department of Psychological and Brain Sciences, Dartmouth College, Hanover, NH, United States
| | - Josiah B. Ambrose
- Kaiser Permanente Redwood City Medical Center, Redwood City, CA, United States
| | - Everett Austin
- Kaiser Permanente Redwood City Medical Center, Redwood City, CA, United States
| | - Heather E. Dawes
- Weill Institute for Neurosciences, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, United States
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, United States
| | - Andrew D. Krystal
- Department of Psychiatry, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, United States
- Weill Institute for Neurosciences, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, United States
| | - Edward F. Chang
- Weill Institute for Neurosciences, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, United States
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, United States
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Scangos KW, Khambhati AN, Daly PM, Makhoul GS, Sugrue LP, Zamanian H, Liu TX, Rao VR, Sellers KK, Dawes HE, Starr PA, Krystal AD, Chang EF. Closed-loop neuromodulation in an individual with treatment-resistant depression. Nat Med 2021; 27:1696-1700. [PMID: 34608328 DOI: 10.1038/s41591-021-01480-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 147] [Impact Index Per Article: 49.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/03/2021] [Accepted: 07/23/2021] [Indexed: 11/09/2022]
Abstract
Deep brain stimulation is a promising treatment for neuropsychiatric conditions such as major depression. It could be optimized by identifying neural biomarkers that trigger therapy selectively when symptom severity is elevated. We developed an approach that first used multi-day intracranial electrophysiology and focal electrical stimulation to identify a personalized symptom-specific biomarker and a treatment location where stimulation improved symptoms. We then implanted a chronic deep brain sensing and stimulation device and implemented a biomarker-driven closed-loop therapy in an individual with depression. Closed-loop therapy resulted in a rapid and sustained improvement in depression. Future work is required to determine if the results and approach of this n-of-1 study generalize to a broader population.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Katherine W Scangos
- Weill Institute for Neurosciences, University of California, San Francsico, CA, USA.
- Department of Psychiatry, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA.
| | - Ankit N Khambhati
- Weill Institute for Neurosciences, University of California, San Francsico, CA, USA
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Patrick M Daly
- Weill Institute for Neurosciences, University of California, San Francsico, CA, USA
- Department of Psychiatry, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Ghassan S Makhoul
- Weill Institute for Neurosciences, University of California, San Francsico, CA, USA
- Department of Psychiatry, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Leo P Sugrue
- Weill Institute for Neurosciences, University of California, San Francsico, CA, USA
- Department of Radiology, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Hashem Zamanian
- Weill Institute for Neurosciences, University of California, San Francsico, CA, USA
- Department of Psychiatry, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Tony X Liu
- Weill Institute for Neurosciences, University of California, San Francsico, CA, USA
- Department of Psychiatry, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Vikram R Rao
- Weill Institute for Neurosciences, University of California, San Francsico, CA, USA
- Department of Neurology, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Kristin K Sellers
- Weill Institute for Neurosciences, University of California, San Francsico, CA, USA
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Heather E Dawes
- Weill Institute for Neurosciences, University of California, San Francsico, CA, USA
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Philip A Starr
- Weill Institute for Neurosciences, University of California, San Francsico, CA, USA
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Andrew D Krystal
- Weill Institute for Neurosciences, University of California, San Francsico, CA, USA
- Department of Psychiatry, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Edward F Chang
- Weill Institute for Neurosciences, University of California, San Francsico, CA, USA
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Silva AB, Khambhati AN, Speidel BA, Chang EF, Rao VR. Effects of anterior thalamic nuclei stimulation on hippocampal activity: Chronic recording in a patient with drug-resistant focal epilepsy. Epilepsy Behav Rep 2021; 16:100467. [PMID: 34458713 PMCID: PMC8379668 DOI: 10.1016/j.ebr.2021.100467] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/08/2021] [Revised: 06/24/2021] [Accepted: 06/26/2021] [Indexed: 11/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Devices for RNS and thalamic DBS were implanted in a single person with epilepsy. RNS electrocorticography enabled characterization of acute and chronic DBS effects. DBS caused acute, phasic, frequency-dependent responses in hippocampus and cortex. DBS modulated functional connectivity and suppressed epileptiform activity over time. Chronic electrocorticography elucidates progressive effects of thalamic stimulation.
Implanted neurostimulation devices are gaining traction as palliative treatment options for certain forms of drug-resistant epilepsy, but clinical utility of these devices is hindered by incomplete mechanistic understanding of their therapeutic effects. Approved devices for anterior thalamic nuclei deep brain stimulation (ANT DBS) are thought to work at a network level, but limited sensing capability precludes characterization of neurophysiological effects outside the thalamus. Here, we describe a patient with drug-resistant temporal lobe epilepsy who was implanted with a responsive neurostimulation device (RNS System), involving hippocampal and ipsilateral temporal neocortical leads, and subsequently received ANT DBS. Over 1.5 years, RNS System electrocorticography enabled multiscale characterization of neurophysiological effects of thalamic stimulation. In brain regions sampled by the RNS System, ANT DBS produced acute, phasic, frequency-dependent responses, including suppression of hippocampal low frequency local field potentials. ANT DBS modulated functional connectivity between hippocampus and neocortex. Finally, ANT DBS progressively suppressed hippocampal epileptiform activity in relation to the extent of hippocampal theta suppression, which informs stimulation parameter selection for ANT DBS. Taken together, this unique clinical scenario, involving hippocampal recordings of unprecedented chronicity alongside ANT DBS, sheds light on the therapeutic mechanism of thalamic stimulation and highlights capabilities needed in next-generation devices.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alexander B Silva
- Medical Scientist Training Program, University of California, San Francisco, USA
| | - Ankit N Khambhati
- Department of Neurological Surgery and Weill Institute for Neurosciences, University of California, San Francisco, USA
| | - Benjamin A Speidel
- Department of Neurology and Weill Institute for Neurosciences, University of California, San Francisco, United States
| | - Edward F Chang
- Department of Neurological Surgery and Weill Institute for Neurosciences, University of California, San Francisco, USA
| | - Vikram R Rao
- Department of Neurology and Weill Institute for Neurosciences, University of California, San Francisco, United States
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Khambhati AN, Shafi A, Rao VR, Chang EF. Long-term brain network reorganization predicts responsive neurostimulation outcomes for focal epilepsy. Sci Transl Med 2021; 13:13/608/eabf6588. [PMID: 34433640 DOI: 10.1126/scitranslmed.abf6588] [Citation(s) in RCA: 63] [Impact Index Per Article: 21.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/10/2020] [Revised: 03/12/2021] [Accepted: 06/15/2021] [Indexed: 12/21/2022]
Abstract
Responsive neurostimulation (RNS) devices, able to detect imminent seizures and to rapidly deliver electrical stimulation to the brain, are effective in reducing seizures in some patients with focal epilepsy. However, therapeutic response to RNS is often slow, is highly variable, and defies prognostication based on clinical factors. A prevailing view holds that RNS efficacy is primarily mediated by acute seizure termination; yet, stimulations greatly outnumber seizures and occur mostly in the interictal state, suggesting chronic modulation of brain networks that generate seizures. Here, using years-long intracranial neural recordings collected during RNS therapy, we found that patients with the greatest therapeutic benefit undergo progressive, frequency-dependent reorganization of interictal functional connectivity. The extent of this reorganization scales directly with seizure reduction and emerges within the first year of RNS treatment, enabling potential early prediction of therapeutic response. Our findings reveal a mechanism for RNS that involves network plasticity and may inform development of next-generation devices for epilepsy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ankit N Khambhati
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA 94143, USA.,Weill Institute for Neurosciences, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA 94143, USA
| | - Alia Shafi
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA 94143, USA.,Weill Institute for Neurosciences, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA 94143, USA
| | - Vikram R Rao
- Weill Institute for Neurosciences, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA 94143, USA. .,Department of Neurology, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA 94143, USA
| | - Edward F Chang
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA 94143, USA. .,Weill Institute for Neurosciences, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA 94143, USA
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Chiang S, Khambhati AN, Wang ET, Vannucci M, Chang EF, Rao VR. Evidence of state-dependence in the effectiveness of responsive neurostimulation for seizure modulation. Brain Stimul 2021; 14:366-375. [PMID: 33556620 PMCID: PMC8083819 DOI: 10.1016/j.brs.2021.01.023] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/17/2020] [Revised: 01/25/2021] [Accepted: 01/31/2021] [Indexed: 11/28/2022] Open
Abstract
Background: An implanted device for brain-responsive neurostimulation (RNS® System) is approved as an effective treatment to reduce seizures in adults with medically-refractory focal epilepsy. Clinical trials of the RNS System demonstrate population-level reduction in average seizure frequency, but therapeutic response is highly variable. Hypothesis: Recent evidence links seizures to cyclical fluctuations in underlying risk. We tested the hypothesis that effectiveness of responsive neurostimulation varies based on current state within cyclical risk fluctuations. Methods: We analyzed retrospective data from 25 adults with medically-refractory focal epilepsy implanted with the RNS System. Chronic electrocorticography was used to record electrographic seizures, and hidden Markov models decoded seizures into fluctuations in underlying risk. State-dependent associations of RNS System stimulation parameters with changes in risk were estimated. Results: Higher charge density was associated with improved outcomes, both for remaining in a low seizure risk state and for transitioning from a high to a low seizure risk state. The effect of stimulation frequency depended on initial seizure risk state: when starting in a low risk state, higher stimulation frequencies were associated with remaining in a low risk state, but when starting in a high risk state, lower stimulation frequencies were associated with transition to a low risk state. Findings were consistent across bipolar and monopolar stimulation configurations. Conclusion: The impact of RNS on seizure frequency exhibits state-dependence, such that stimulation parameters which are effective in one seizure risk state may not be effective in another. These findings represent conceptual advances in understanding the therapeutic mechanism of RNS, and directly inform current practices of RNS tuning and the development of next-generation neurostimulation systems.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sharon Chiang
- Department of Neurology and Weill Institute for Neurosciences, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, United States.
| | - Ankit N Khambhati
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, United States
| | - Emily T Wang
- Department of Statistics, Rice University, Houston, TX, United States
| | - Marina Vannucci
- Department of Statistics, Rice University, Houston, TX, United States
| | - Edward F Chang
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, United States
| | - Vikram R Rao
- Department of Neurology and Weill Institute for Neurosciences, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, United States
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Andrews JP, Ammanuel S, Kleen J, Khambhati AN, Knowlton R, Chang EF. Early seizure spread and epilepsy surgery: A systematic review. Epilepsia 2020; 61:2163-2172. [PMID: 32944952 DOI: 10.1111/epi.16668] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/31/2020] [Revised: 08/03/2020] [Accepted: 08/04/2020] [Indexed: 01/03/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE A fundamental question in epilepsy surgery is how to delineate the margins of cortex that must be resected to result in seizure freedom. Whether and which areas showing seizure activity early in ictus must be removed to avoid postoperative recurrence of seizures is an area of ongoing research. Seizure spread dynamics in the initial seconds of ictus are often correlated with postoperative outcome; there is neither a consensus definition of early spread nor a concise summary of the existing literature linking seizure spread to postsurgical seizure outcomes. The present study is intended to summarize the literature that links seizure spread to postoperative seizure outcome and to provide a framework for quantitative assessment of early seizure spread. METHODS A systematic review was carried out according to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. A Medline search identified clinical studies reporting data on seizure spread measured by intracranial electrodes, having at least 10 subjects and reporting at least 1-year postoperative outcome in the English literature from 1990 to 2019. Studies were evaluated regarding support for a primary hypothesis: Areas of early seizure spread represent cortex with seizure-generating potential. RESULTS The search yielded 4562 studies: 15 studies met inclusion criteria and 7 studies supported the primary hypothesis. The methods and metrics used to describe seizure spread were heterogenous. The timeframe of seizure spread associated with seizure outcome ranged from 1-14 seconds, with large, well-designed, retrospective studies pointing to 3-10 seconds as most likely to provide meaningful correlates of postoperative seizure freedom. SIGNIFICANCE The complex correlation between electrophysiologic seizure spread and the potential for seizure generation needs further elucidation. Prospective cohort studies or trials are needed to evaluate epilepsy surgery targeting cortex involved in the first 3-10 seconds of ictus.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- John P Andrews
- Department of Neurological Surgery, School of Medicine, University of California-San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA
| | - Simon Ammanuel
- Department of Neurological Surgery, School of Medicine, University of California-San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA
| | - Jonathan Kleen
- Department of Neurology, School of Medicine, University of California-San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA
| | - Ankit N Khambhati
- Department of Neurological Surgery, School of Medicine, University of California-San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA
| | - Robert Knowlton
- Department of Neurology, School of Medicine, University of California-San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA
| | - Edward F Chang
- Department of Neurological Surgery, School of Medicine, University of California-San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Stiso J, Khambhati AN, Menara T, Kahn AE, Stein JM, Das SR, Gorniak R, Tracy J, Litt B, Davis KA, Pasqualetti F, Lucas TH, Bassett DS. White Matter Network Architecture Guides Direct Electrical Stimulation through Optimal State Transitions. Cell Rep 2020; 28:2554-2566.e7. [PMID: 31484068 PMCID: PMC6849479 DOI: 10.1016/j.celrep.2019.08.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 71] [Impact Index Per Article: 17.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/01/2018] [Revised: 05/15/2019] [Accepted: 07/30/2019] [Indexed: 11/28/2022] Open
Abstract
Optimizing direct electrical stimulation for the treatment of neurological disease remains difficult due to an incomplete understanding of its physical propagation through brain tissue. Here, we use network control theory to predict how stimulation spreads through white matter to influence spatially distributed dynamics. We test the theory’s predictions using a unique dataset comprising diffusion weighted imaging and electrocorticography in epilepsy patients undergoing grid stimulation. We find statistically significant shared variance between the predicted activity state transitions and the observed activity state transitions. We then use an optimal control framework to posit testable hypotheses regarding which brain states and structural properties will efficiently improve memory encoding when stimulated. Our work quantifies the role that white matter architecture plays in guiding the dynamics of direct electrical stimulation and offers empirical support for the utility of network control theory in explaining the brain’s response to stimulation. Stiso et al. report evidence that network control theory can explain the propagation of electrical stimulation through the human brain and quantify how white matter connectivity is crucial for driving spatially distributed changes in activity. Furthermore, they use network control theory to predict stimulation outcome in specific cognitive contexts.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jennifer Stiso
- Department of Neuroscience, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA; Department of Bioengineering, School of Engineering and Applied Science, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA
| | - Ankit N Khambhati
- Department of Bioengineering, School of Engineering and Applied Science, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA
| | - Tommaso Menara
- Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of California, Riverside, Riverside, CA 92521, USA
| | - Ari E Kahn
- Department of Neuroscience, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA; Department of Bioengineering, School of Engineering and Applied Science, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA
| | - Joel M Stein
- Department of Radiology, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA
| | - Sandihitsu R Das
- Department of Neurology, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA
| | - Richard Gorniak
- Department of Radiology, Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, Philadelphia, PA 19107, USA
| | - Joseph Tracy
- Department of Neurology, Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, Philadelphia, PA 19107, USA
| | - Brian Litt
- Department of Neurology, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA; Penn Center for Neuroengineering and Therapeutics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA
| | - Kathryn A Davis
- Department of Neurology, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA; Penn Center for Neuroengineering and Therapeutics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA
| | - Fabio Pasqualetti
- Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of California, Riverside, Riverside, CA 92521, USA
| | - Timothy H Lucas
- Penn Center for Neuroengineering and Therapeutics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA; Department of Neurosurgery, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA
| | - Danielle S Bassett
- Department of Bioengineering, School of Engineering and Applied Science, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA; Department of Neurology, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA; Penn Center for Neuroengineering and Therapeutics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA; Department of Electrical and Systems Engineering, School of Engineering and Applied Science, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA; Department of Physics and Astronomy, College of Arts & Sciences, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA; Department of Psychiatry, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Kini LG, Bernabei JM, Mikhail F, Hadar P, Shah P, Khambhati AN, Oechsel K, Archer R, Boccanfuso J, Conrad E, Shinohara RT, Stein JM, Das S, Kheder A, Lucas TH, Davis KA, Bassett DS, Litt B. Virtual resection predicts surgical outcome for drug-resistant epilepsy. Brain 2020; 142:3892-3905. [PMID: 31599323 DOI: 10.1093/brain/awz303] [Citation(s) in RCA: 60] [Impact Index Per Article: 15.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/26/2019] [Revised: 07/11/2019] [Accepted: 08/08/2019] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Patients with drug-resistant epilepsy often require surgery to become seizure-free. While laser ablation and implantable stimulation devices have lowered the morbidity of these procedures, seizure-free rates have not dramatically improved, particularly for patients without focal lesions. This is in part because it is often unclear where to intervene in these cases. To address this clinical need, several research groups have published methods to map epileptic networks but applying them to improve patient care remains a challenge. In this study we advance clinical translation of these methods by: (i) presenting and sharing a robust pipeline to rigorously quantify the boundaries of the resection zone and determining which intracranial EEG electrodes lie within it; (ii) validating a brain network model on a retrospective cohort of 28 patients with drug-resistant epilepsy implanted with intracranial electrodes prior to surgical resection; and (iii) sharing all neuroimaging, annotated electrophysiology, and clinical metadata to facilitate future collaboration. Our network methods accurately forecast whether patients are likely to benefit from surgical intervention based on synchronizability of intracranial EEG (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.89) and provide novel information that traditional electrographic features do not. We further report that removing synchronizing brain regions is associated with improved clinical outcome, and postulate that sparing desynchronizing regions may further be beneficial. Our findings suggest that data-driven network-based methods can identify patients likely to benefit from resective or ablative therapy, and perhaps prevent invasive interventions in those unlikely to do so.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lohith G Kini
- Department of Bioengineering, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia PA 19104, USA.,Center for Neuroengineering and Therapeutics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia PA 19104, USA
| | - John M Bernabei
- Department of Bioengineering, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia PA 19104, USA.,Center for Neuroengineering and Therapeutics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia PA 19104, USA
| | - Fadi Mikhail
- Center for Neuroengineering and Therapeutics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia PA 19104, USA.,Department of Neurology, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia PA 19104, USA
| | - Peter Hadar
- Center for Neuroengineering and Therapeutics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia PA 19104, USA.,Department of Neurology, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia PA 19104, USA
| | - Preya Shah
- Department of Bioengineering, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia PA 19104, USA.,Center for Neuroengineering and Therapeutics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia PA 19104, USA
| | - Ankit N Khambhati
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco CA 94143, USA
| | - Kelly Oechsel
- Center for Neuroengineering and Therapeutics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia PA 19104, USA.,Department of Neurology, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia PA 19104, USA
| | - Ryan Archer
- Center for Neuroengineering and Therapeutics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia PA 19104, USA.,Department of Neurology, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia PA 19104, USA
| | - Jacqueline Boccanfuso
- Center for Neuroengineering and Therapeutics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia PA 19104, USA.,Department of Neurology, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia PA 19104, USA
| | - Erin Conrad
- Department of Neurology, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia PA 19104, USA
| | - Russell T Shinohara
- Department of Biostatistics, Epidemiology, and Informatics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia PA 19104, USA.,Center for Biomedical Image Computing and Analytics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia PA 19104, USA
| | - Joel M Stein
- Department of Radiology, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia PA 19104, USA
| | - Sandhitsu Das
- Department of Neurology, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia PA 19104, USA
| | - Ammar Kheder
- Department of Neurology, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia PA 19104, USA
| | - Timothy H Lucas
- Department of Neurosurgery, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia PA 19104, USA
| | - Kathryn A Davis
- Center for Neuroengineering and Therapeutics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia PA 19104, USA.,Department of Neurology, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia PA 19104, USA
| | - Danielle S Bassett
- Department of Bioengineering, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia PA 19104, USA.,Department of Electrical and Systems Engineering, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia PA 19104, USA.,Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia PA 19104, USA.,Department of Psychiatry, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia PA 19104, USA
| | - Brian Litt
- Department of Bioengineering, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia PA 19104, USA.,Center for Neuroengineering and Therapeutics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia PA 19104, USA.,Department of Neurology, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia PA 19104, USA.,Department of Neurosurgery, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia PA 19104, USA
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Kao CH, Khambhati AN, Bassett DS, Nassar MR, McGuire JT, Gold JI, Kable JW. Functional brain network reconfiguration during learning in a dynamic environment. Nat Commun 2020; 11:1682. [PMID: 32245973 PMCID: PMC7125157 DOI: 10.1038/s41467-020-15442-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/27/2019] [Accepted: 03/06/2020] [Indexed: 11/09/2022] Open
Abstract
When learning about dynamic and uncertain environments, people should update their beliefs most strongly when new evidence is most informative, such as when the environment undergoes a surprising change or existing beliefs are highly uncertain. Here we show that modulations of surprise and uncertainty are encoded in a particular, temporally dynamic pattern of whole-brain functional connectivity, and this encoding is enhanced in individuals that adapt their learning dynamics more appropriately in response to these factors. The key feature of this whole-brain pattern of functional connectivity is stronger connectivity, or functional integration, between the fronto-parietal and other functional systems. Our results provide new insights regarding the association between dynamic adjustments in learning and dynamic, large-scale changes in functional connectivity across the brain.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chang-Hao Kao
- Department of Psychology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, 19104, USA.
| | - Ankit N Khambhati
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, CA, 94122, USA
| | - Danielle S Bassett
- Department of Bioengineering, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, 19104, USA.,Department of Neurology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, 19104, USA.,Department of Electrical & Systems Engineering, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, 19104, USA.,Department of Physics & Astronomy, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, 19104, USA.,Department of Psychiatry, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, 19104, USA.,Santa Fe Institute, Santa Fe, NM, 87501, USA
| | - Matthew R Nassar
- Department of Neuroscience, Brown University, Providence, RI, 02912, USA.,Robert J. and Nancy D. Carney Institute for Brain Science, Brown University, Providence, RI, 02912, USA
| | - Joseph T McGuire
- Department of Psychological and Brain Sciences, Boston University, Boston, MA, 02215, USA
| | - Joshua I Gold
- Department of Neuroscience, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, 19104, USA
| | - Joseph W Kable
- Department of Psychology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, 19104, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Ashourvan A, Pequito S, Khambhati AN, Mikhail F, Baldassano SN, Davis KA, Lucas TH, Vettel JM, Litt B, Pappas GJ, Bassett DS. Model-based design for seizure control by stimulation. J Neural Eng 2020; 17:026009. [PMID: 32103826 PMCID: PMC8341467 DOI: 10.1088/1741-2552/ab7a4e] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/19/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Current brain stimulation paradigms are largely empirical rather than theoretical. An opportunity exists to improve upon their modest effectiveness in closed-loop control strategies with the development of theoretically grounded, model-based designs. APPROACH Inspired by this need, here we couple experimental data and mathematical modeling with a control-theoretic strategy for seizure termination. We begin by exercising a dynamical systems approach to model seizures (n = 94) recorded using intracranial EEG (iEEG) from 21 patients with medication-resistant, localization-related epilepsy. MAIN RESULTS Although each patient's seizures displayed unique spatial and temporal patterns, their evolution can be parsimoniously characterized by the same model form. Idiosyncracies of the model can inform individualized intervention strategies, specifically in iEEG samples with well-localized seizure onset zones. Temporal fluctuations in the spatial profiles of the oscillatory modes show that seizure onset marks a transition into a regime in which the underlying system supports prolonged rhythmic and focal activity. Based on these observations, we propose a control-theoretic strategy that aims to stabilize ictal activity using static output feedback for linear time-invariant switching systems. Finally, we demonstrate in silico that our proposed strategy allows us to dampen the emerging focal oscillatory sources using only a small set of electrodes. SIGNIFICANCE Our integrative study informs the development of modulation and control algorithms for neurostimulation that could improve the effectiveness of implantable, closed-loop anti-epileptic devices.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Arian Ashourvan
- Department of Bioengineering, School of Engineering and Applied Science, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, United States of America. U.S. Army Research Laboratory, Aberdeen Proving Ground, MD 21005, United States of America
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
19
|
Stacey W, Kramer M, Gunnarsdottir K, Gonzalez-Martinez J, Zaghloul K, Inati S, Sarma S, Stiso J, Khambhati AN, Bassett DS, Smith RJ, Liu VB, Lopour BA, Staba R. Emerging roles of network analysis for epilepsy. Epilepsy Res 2020; 159:106255. [PMID: 31855828 PMCID: PMC6990460 DOI: 10.1016/j.eplepsyres.2019.106255] [Citation(s) in RCA: 33] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/28/2019] [Accepted: 12/08/2019] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
In recent years there has been increasing interest in applying network science tools to EEG data. At the 2018 American Epilepsy Society conference in New Orleans, LA, the yearly session of the Engineering and Neurostimulation Special Interest Group focused on emerging, translational technologies to analyze seizure networks. Each speaker demonstrated practical examples of how network tools can be utilized in clinical care and provide additional data to help care for patients with intractable epilepsy. The groups presented advances using tools from functional connectivity, control theory, and graph theory to analyze human EEG data. These tools have great potential to augment clinical interpretation of EEG signals.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- William Stacey
- Department of Neurology, Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Michigan, United States.
| | - Mark Kramer
- Department of Mathematics and Statistics, Center of Systems Neuroscience, Boston University, United States
| | | | | | - Kareem Zaghloul
- Surgical Neurology Branch, National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke, NIH, United States
| | - Sara Inati
- Office of the Clinical Director, National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke, NIH, United States
| | - Sridevi Sarma
- Department of Neurology, Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Michigan, United States
| | - Jennifer Stiso
- Department of Bioengineering, University of Pennsylvania, United States
| | - Ankit N Khambhati
- Department of Bioengineering, University of Pennsylvania, United States
| | | | - Rachel J Smith
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of California, Irvine, United States
| | - Virginia B Liu
- Department of Pediatrics, University of California, Irvine, United States; Department of Child Neurology, Children's Hospital of Orange County, CA, United States
| | - Beth A Lopour
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of California, Irvine, United States
| | - Richard Staba
- Department of Neurology, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, CA, United States
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Khambhati AN, Kahn AE, Costantini J, Ezzyat Y, Solomon EA, Gross RE, Jobst BC, Sheth SA, Zaghloul KA, Worrell G, Seger S, Lega BC, Weiss S, Sperling MR, Gorniak R, Das SR, Stein JM, Rizzuto DS, Kahana MJ, Lucas TH, Davis KA, Tracy JI, Bassett DS. Functional control of electrophysiological network architecture using direct neurostimulation in humans. Netw Neurosci 2019; 3:848-877. [PMID: 31410383 PMCID: PMC6663306 DOI: 10.1162/netn_a_00089] [Citation(s) in RCA: 40] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/02/2019] [Accepted: 04/14/2019] [Indexed: 01/30/2023] Open
Abstract
Chronically implantable neurostimulation devices are becoming a clinically viable option for treating patients with neurological disease and psychiatric disorders. Neurostimulation offers the ability to probe and manipulate distributed networks of interacting brain areas in dysfunctional circuits. Here, we use tools from network control theory to examine the dynamic reconfiguration of functionally interacting neuronal ensembles during targeted neurostimulation of cortical and subcortical brain structures. By integrating multimodal intracranial recordings and diffusion-weighted imaging from patients with drug-resistant epilepsy, we test hypothesized structural and functional rules that predict altered patterns of synchronized local field potentials. We demonstrate the ability to predictably reconfigure functional interactions depending on stimulation strength and location. Stimulation of areas with structurally weak connections largely modulates the functional hubness of downstream areas and concurrently propels the brain towards more difficult-to-reach dynamical states. By using focal perturbations to bridge large-scale structure, function, and markers of behavior, our findings suggest that stimulation may be tuned to influence different scales of network interactions driving cognition. Brain stimulation devices capable of perturbing the physiological state of neural systems are rapidly gaining popularity for their potential to treat neurological and psychiatric disease. A root problem is that underlying dysfunction spans a large-scale network of brain regions, requiring the ability to control the complex interactions between multiple brain areas. Here, we use tools from network control theory to examine the dynamic reconfiguration of functionally interacting neuronal ensembles during targeted neurostimulation of cortical and subcortical brain structures. We demonstrate the ability to predictably reconfigure patterns of interactions between functional brain areas by modulating the strength and location of stimulation. Our findings have high significance for designing stimulation protocols capable of modulating distributed neural circuits in the human brain.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ankit N Khambhati
- Department of Bioengineering, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Ari E Kahn
- Department of Bioengineering, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Julia Costantini
- Department of Bioengineering, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Youssef Ezzyat
- Department of Psychology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Ethan A Solomon
- Department of Bioengineering, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Robert E Gross
- Department of Neurosurgery, Emory University Hospital, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - Barbara C Jobst
- Department of Neurology, Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, NH, USA
| | - Sameer A Sheth
- Department of Neurosurgery, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Kareem A Zaghloul
- Surgical Neurology Branch, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | | | - Sarah Seger
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Texas, Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA
| | - Bradley C Lega
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Texas, Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA
| | - Shennan Weiss
- Department of Neurology, Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Michael R Sperling
- Department of Neurology, Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Richard Gorniak
- Department of Radiology, Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Sandhitsu R Das
- Department of Neurology, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Joel M Stein
- Department of Radiology, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Daniel S Rizzuto
- Department of Psychology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Michael J Kahana
- Department of Psychology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Timothy H Lucas
- Department of Neurosurgery, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Kathryn A Davis
- Department of Neurology, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Joseph I Tracy
- Department of Neurology, Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Danielle S Bassett
- Department of Bioengineering, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Corsi MC, Chavez M, Schwartz D, Hugueville L, Khambhati AN, Bassett DS, De Vico Fallani F. Integrating EEG and MEG Signals to Improve Motor Imagery Classification in Brain–Computer Interface. Int J Neural Syst 2019; 29:1850014. [DOI: 10.1142/s0129065718500144] [Citation(s) in RCA: 47] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/18/2022]
Abstract
We adopted a fusion approach that combines features from simultaneously recorded electroencephalogram (EEG) and magnetoencephalogram (MEG) signals to improve classification performances in motor imagery-based brain–computer interfaces (BCIs). We applied our approach to a group of 15 healthy subjects and found a significant classification performance enhancement as compared to standard single-modality approaches in the alpha and beta bands. Taken together, our findings demonstrate the advantage of considering multimodal approaches as complementary tools for improving the impact of noninvasive BCIs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marie-Constance Corsi
- Inria, Aramis project-team, F-75013, Paris, France
- Institut du Cerveau et de la Moelle épinière, ICM, F-75013, Paris, France
- Inserm, U 1127, F-75013, Paris, France
- CNRS, UMR 7225, F-75013, Paris, France
- Sorbonne Université, F-75013, Paris, France
| | | | - Denis Schwartz
- Centre de NeuroImagerie de Recherche — CENIR, Centre de Recherche de l’Institut du Cerveau et de la Moelle Epinère, Université Pierre et Marie Curie-Paris 6 UMR-S975, INSERM U975, CNRS UMR7225, Groupe Hospitalier Pitié-Salpêtrière, Paris, France
| | - Laurent Hugueville
- Centre de NeuroImagerie de Recherche — CENIR, Centre de Recherche de l’Institut du Cerveau et de la Moelle Epinère, Université Pierre et Marie Curie-Paris 6 UMR-S975, INSERM U975, CNRS UMR7225, Groupe Hospitalier Pitié-Salpêtrière, Paris, France
| | - Ankit N. Khambhati
- Department of Bioengineering, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA
| | - Danielle S. Bassett
- Department of Bioengineering, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA
- Department of Electrical and Systems Engineering, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA
- Department of Physics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA
- Department of Neurology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA
| | - Fabrizio De Vico Fallani
- Inria, Aramis project-team, F-75013, Paris, France
- Institut du Cerveau et de la Moelle épinière, ICM, F-75013, Paris, France
- Inserm, U 1127, F-75013, Paris, France
- CNRS, UMR 7225, F-75013, Paris, France
- Sorbonne Université, F-75013, Paris, France
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Khambhati AN, Sizemore AE, Betzel RF, Bassett DS. Modeling and interpreting mesoscale network dynamics. Neuroimage 2018; 180:337-349. [PMID: 28645844 PMCID: PMC5738302 DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2017.06.029] [Citation(s) in RCA: 63] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/30/2017] [Revised: 06/12/2017] [Accepted: 06/14/2017] [Indexed: 11/28/2022] Open
Abstract
Recent advances in brain imaging techniques, measurement approaches, and storage capacities have provided an unprecedented supply of high temporal resolution neural data. These data present a remarkable opportunity to gain a mechanistic understanding not just of circuit structure, but also of circuit dynamics, and its role in cognition and disease. Such understanding necessitates a description of the raw observations, and a delineation of computational models and mathematical theories that accurately capture fundamental principles behind the observations. Here we review recent advances in a range of modeling approaches that embrace the temporally-evolving interconnected structure of the brain and summarize that structure in a dynamic graph. We describe recent efforts to model dynamic patterns of connectivity, dynamic patterns of activity, and patterns of activity atop connectivity. In the context of these models, we review important considerations in statistical testing, including parametric and non-parametric approaches. Finally, we offer thoughts on careful and accurate interpretation of dynamic graph architecture, and outline important future directions for method development.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ankit N Khambhati
- Department of Bioengineering, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA; Center for Neuroengineering and Therapeautics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA
| | - Ann E Sizemore
- Department of Bioengineering, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA
| | - Richard F Betzel
- Department of Bioengineering, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA
| | - Danielle S Bassett
- Department of Bioengineering, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA; Center for Neuroengineering and Therapeautics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA; Department of Electrical and Systems Engineering, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Khambhati AN, Medaglia JD, Karuza EA, Thompson-Schill SL, Bassett DS. Correction: Subgraphs of functional brain networks identify dynamical constraints of cognitive control. PLoS Comput Biol 2018; 14:e1006420. [PMID: 30153248 PMCID: PMC6112641 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1006420] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/09/2023] Open
Abstract
[This corrects the article DOI: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1006234.].
Collapse
|
24
|
Khambhati AN, Medaglia JD, Karuza EA, Thompson-Schill SL, Bassett DS. Subgraphs of functional brain networks identify dynamical constraints of cognitive control. PLoS Comput Biol 2018; 14:e1006234. [PMID: 29979673 PMCID: PMC6056061 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1006234] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/10/2018] [Revised: 07/23/2018] [Accepted: 05/27/2018] [Indexed: 11/19/2022] Open
Abstract
Brain anatomy and physiology support the human ability to navigate a complex space of perceptions and actions. To maneuver across an ever-changing landscape of mental states, the brain invokes cognitive control-a set of dynamic processes that engage and disengage different groups of brain regions to modulate attention, switch between tasks, and inhibit prepotent responses. Current theory posits that correlated and anticorrelated brain activity may signify cooperative and competitive interactions between brain areas that subserve adaptive behavior. In this study, we use a quantitative approach to identify distinct topological motifs of functional interactions and examine how their expression relates to cognitive control processes and behavior. In particular, we acquire fMRI BOLD signal in twenty-eight healthy subjects as they perform two cognitive control tasks-a Stroop interference task and a local-global perception switching task using Navon figures-each with low and high cognitive control demand conditions. Based on these data, we construct dynamic functional brain networks and use a parts-based, network decomposition technique called non-negative matrix factorization to identify putative cognitive control subgraphs whose temporal expression captures distributed network structures involved in different phases of cooperative and competitive control processes. Our results demonstrate that temporal expression of the subgraphs fluctuate alongside changes in cognitive demand and are associated with individual differences in task performance. These findings offer insight into how coordinated changes in the cooperative and competitive roles of cognitive systems map trajectories between cognitively demanding brain states.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ankit N. Khambhati
- Department of Bioengineering, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States of America
| | - John D. Medaglia
- Department of Psychology, Drexel University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States of America
- Department of Neurology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States of America
| | - Elisabeth A. Karuza
- Department of Psychology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States of America
| | - Sharon L. Thompson-Schill
- Department of Psychology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States of America
| | - Danielle S. Bassett
- Department of Bioengineering, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States of America
- Department of Electrical & Systems Engineering, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States of America
- Department of Neurology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States of America
- Department of Physics & Astronomy, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States of America
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Tomlinson SB, Khambhati AN, Bermudez C, Kamens RM, Heuer GG, Porter BE, Marsh ED. Alterations of network synchrony after epileptic seizures: An analysis of post-ictal intracranial recordings in pediatric epilepsy patients. Epilepsy Res 2018; 143:41-49. [PMID: 29655171 DOI: 10.1016/j.eplepsyres.2018.04.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/13/2017] [Revised: 04/03/2018] [Accepted: 04/04/2018] [Indexed: 01/03/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Post-ictal EEG alterations have been identified in studies of intracranial recordings, but the clinical significance of post-ictal EEG activity is undetermined. The purpose of this study was to examine the relationship between peri-ictal EEG activity, surgical outcome, and extent of seizure propagation in a sample of pediatric epilepsy patients. METHODS Intracranial EEG recordings were obtained from 19 patients (mean age = 11.4 years, range = 3-20 years) with 57 seizures used for analysis (mean = 3.0 seizures per patient). For each seizure, 3-min segments were extracted from adjacent pre-ictal and post-ictal epochs. To compare physiology of the epileptic network between epochs, we calculated the relative delta power (Δ) using discrete Fourier transformation and constructed functional networks based on broadband connectivity (conn). We investigated differences between the pre-ictal (Δpre, connpre) and post-ictal (Δpost, connpost) segments in focal-network (i.e., confined to seizure onset zone) versus distributed-network (i.e., diffuse ictal propagation) seizures. RESULTS Distributed-network (DN) seizures exhibited increased post-ictal delta power and global EEG connectivity compared to focal-network (FN) seizures. Following DN seizures, patients with seizure-free outcomes exhibited a 14.7% mean increase in delta power and an 8.3% mean increase in global connectivity compared to pre-ictal baseline, which was dramatically less than values observed among seizure-persistent patients (29.6% and 47.1%, respectively). SIGNIFICANCE Post-ictal differences between DN and FN seizures correlate with post-operative seizure persistence. We hypothesize that post-ictal deactivation of subcortical nuclei recruited during seizure propagation may account for this result while lending insights into mechanisms of post-operative seizure recurrence.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Samuel B Tomlinson
- Department of Pediatrics, Division of Child Neurology, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA, 19104, United States; School of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY, 14642, United States.
| | - Ankit N Khambhati
- Department of Bioengineering, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, 19104, United States; Penn Center for Neuroengineering and Therapeutics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, 19104, United States
| | - Camilo Bermudez
- Department of Pediatrics, Division of Child Neurology, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA, 19104, United States
| | - Rebecca M Kamens
- Department of Pediatrics, Division of Child Neurology, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA, 19104, United States
| | - Gregory G Heuer
- Department of Pediatrics, Division of Neurosurgery, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA, 19104, United States
| | - Brenda E Porter
- Department of Neurology and Neurological Science, Stanford School of Medicine, Palo Alto, CA, 94304, United States
| | - Eric D Marsh
- Department of Pediatrics, Division of Child Neurology, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA, 19104, United States; Department of Neurology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, 19104, United States
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Khambhati AN, Mattar MG, Wymbs NF, Grafton ST, Bassett DS. Beyond modularity: Fine-scale mechanisms and rules for brain network reconfiguration. Neuroimage 2017; 166:385-399. [PMID: 29138087 DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2017.11.015] [Citation(s) in RCA: 33] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/05/2017] [Revised: 10/18/2017] [Accepted: 11/07/2017] [Indexed: 11/15/2022] Open
Abstract
The human brain is in constant flux, as distinct areas engage in transient communication to support basic behaviors as well as complex cognition. The collection of interactions between cortical and subcortical areas forms a functional brain network whose topology evolves with time. Despite the nontrivial dynamics that are germane to this networked system, experimental evidence demonstrates that functional interactions organize into putative brain systems that facilitate different facets of cognitive computation. We hypothesize that such dynamic functional networks are organized around a set of rules that constrain their spatial architecture - which brain regions may functionally interact - and their temporal architecture - how these interactions fluctuate over time. To objectively uncover these organizing principles, we apply an unsupervised machine learning approach called non-negative matrix factorization to time-evolving, resting state functional networks in 20 healthy subjects. This machine learning approach automatically groups temporally co-varying functional interactions into subgraphs that represent putative topological modes of dynamic functional architecture. We find that subgraphs are stratified based on both the underlying modular organization and the topographical distance of their strongest interactions: while many subgraphs are largely contained within modules, others span between modules and are expressed differently over time. The relationship between dynamic subgraphs and modular architecture is further highlighted by the ability of time-varying subgraph expression to explain inter-individual differences in module reorganization. Collectively, these results point to the critical role that subgraphs play in constraining the topography and topology of functional brain networks. More broadly, this machine learning approach opens a new door for understanding the architecture of dynamic functional networks during both task and rest states, and for probing alterations of that architecture in disease.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ankit N Khambhati
- Department of Bioengineering, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA
| | - Marcelo G Mattar
- Department of Bioengineering, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA; Department of Psychology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA
| | - Nicholas F Wymbs
- Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Johns Hopkins Medical Institution, Baltimore, MD 21205, USA
| | - Scott T Grafton
- Department of Psychological and Brain Sciences, University of California, Santa Barbara, CA 93106, USA
| | - Danielle S Bassett
- Department of Bioengineering, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA; Department of Electrical and Systems Engineering, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104 USA.
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Abstract
In this issue of Neuron, Grayson et al. (2016) report how inhibition of amygdala impacts amygdalocortical and corticocortical functional connectivity. Their study predicts changes in functional brain topology, induced by pharmacologic modulation of neuroanatomical circuits using designer receptors exclusively activated by designer drugs (DREADDs), through virtual lesioning of amygdala in structural brain networks.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ankit N Khambhati
- Department of Bioengineering, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA
| | - Danielle S Bassett
- Department of Bioengineering, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA; Department of Electrical and Systems Engineering, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Baldassano SN, Brinkmann BH, Ung H, Blevins T, Conrad EC, Leyde K, Cook MJ, Khambhati AN, Wagenaar JB, Worrell GA, Litt B. Crowdsourcing seizure detection: algorithm development and validation on human implanted device recordings. Brain 2017; 140:1680-1691. [PMID: 28459961 DOI: 10.1093/brain/awx098] [Citation(s) in RCA: 78] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/11/2016] [Accepted: 02/26/2017] [Indexed: 11/14/2022] Open
Abstract
There exist significant clinical and basic research needs for accurate, automated seizure detection algorithms. These algorithms have translational potential in responsive neurostimulation devices and in automatic parsing of continuous intracranial electroencephalography data. An important barrier to developing accurate, validated algorithms for seizure detection is limited access to high-quality, expertly annotated seizure data from prolonged recordings. To overcome this, we hosted a kaggle.com competition to crowdsource the development of seizure detection algorithms using intracranial electroencephalography from canines and humans with epilepsy. The top three performing algorithms from the contest were then validated on out-of-sample patient data including standard clinical data and continuous ambulatory human data obtained over several years using the implantable NeuroVista seizure advisory system. Two hundred teams of data scientists from all over the world participated in the kaggle.com competition. The top performing teams submitted highly accurate algorithms with consistent performance in the out-of-sample validation study. The performance of these seizure detection algorithms, achieved using freely available code and data, sets a new reproducible benchmark for personalized seizure detection. We have also shared a 'plug and play' pipeline to allow other researchers to easily use these algorithms on their own datasets. The success of this competition demonstrates how sharing code and high quality data results in the creation of powerful translational tools with significant potential to impact patient care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Steven N Baldassano
- Department of Bioengineering, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA.,Center for Neuroengineering and Therapeutics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA
| | - Benjamin H Brinkmann
- Mayo Systems Electrophysiology Laboratory, Departments of Neurology and Biomedical Engineering, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN 55905, USA.,Department of Neurology, Mayo Clinic and Mayo Foundation, Rochester, MN 55905, USA
| | - Hoameng Ung
- Department of Bioengineering, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA.,Center for Neuroengineering and Therapeutics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA
| | - Tyler Blevins
- Department of Bioengineering, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA.,Center for Neuroengineering and Therapeutics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA
| | - Erin C Conrad
- Department of Neurology, University of Pennsylvania, PA, USA
| | | | - Mark J Cook
- St. Vincent's Hospital, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.,Department of Medicine, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Ankit N Khambhati
- Department of Bioengineering, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA.,Center for Neuroengineering and Therapeutics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA
| | - Joost B Wagenaar
- Center for Neuroengineering and Therapeutics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA.,Department of Neurology, University of Pennsylvania, PA, USA
| | - Gregory A Worrell
- Mayo Systems Electrophysiology Laboratory, Departments of Neurology and Biomedical Engineering, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN 55905, USA.,Department of Neurology, Mayo Clinic and Mayo Foundation, Rochester, MN 55905, USA
| | - Brian Litt
- Department of Bioengineering, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA.,Center for Neuroengineering and Therapeutics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA.,Department of Neurology, University of Pennsylvania, PA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Abstract
Neuroengineering is faced with unique challenges in repairing or replacing complex neural systems that are composed of many interacting parts. These interactions form intricate patterns over large spatiotemporal scales and produce emergent behaviors that are difficult to predict from individual elements. Network science provides a particularly appropriate framework in which to study and intervene in such systems by treating neural elements (cells, volumes) as nodes in a graph and neural interactions (synapses, white matter tracts) as edges in that graph. Here, we review the emerging discipline of network neuroscience, which uses and develops tools from graph theory to better understand and manipulate neural systems from micro- to macroscales. We present examples of how human brain imaging data are being modeled with network analysis and underscore potential pitfalls. We then highlight current computational and theoretical frontiers and emphasize their utility in informing diagnosis and monitoring, brain-machine interfaces, and brain stimulation. A flexible and rapidly evolving enterprise, network neuroscience provides a set of powerful approaches and fundamental insights that are critical for the neuroengineer's tool kit.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Danielle S Bassett
- Department of Bioengineering, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19104
- Department of Electrical and Systems Engineering, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19104
| | - Ankit N Khambhati
- Department of Bioengineering, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19104
| | - Scott T Grafton
- UCSB Brain Imaging Center and Department of Psychological and Brain Sciences, University of California, Santa Barbara, California 93106
- Institute for Collaborative Biotechnologies, University of California, Santa Barbara, California 93106
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Abstract
Network science and engineering provide a flexible and generalizable tool set to describe and manipulate complex systems characterized by heterogeneous interaction patterns among component parts. While classically applied to social systems, these tools have recently proven to be particularly useful in the study of the brain. In this review, we describe the nascent use of these tools to understand human cognition, and we discuss their utility in informing the meaningful and predictable perturbation of cognition in combination with the emerging capabilities of neurofeedback. To blend these disparate strands of research, we build on emerging conceptualizations of how the brain functions (as a complex network) and how we can develop and target interventions or modulations (as a form of network control). We close with an outline of current frontiers that bridge neurofeedback, connectomics, and network control theory to better understand human cognition.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Danielle S. Bassett
- Department of BioengineeringUniversity of PennsylvaniaPhiladelphiaPennsylvania
- Department of Electrical and Systems EngineeringUniversity of PennsylvaniaPhiladelphiaPennsylvania
| | - Ankit N. Khambhati
- Department of BioengineeringUniversity of PennsylvaniaPhiladelphiaPennsylvania
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Chai LR, Khambhati AN, Ciric R, Moore TM, Gur RC, Gur RE, Satterthwaite TD, Bassett DS. Evolution of brain network dynamics in neurodevelopment. Netw Neurosci 2017; 1:14-30. [PMID: 30793068 PMCID: PMC6330215 DOI: 10.1162/netn_a_00001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 76] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/01/2016] [Accepted: 10/20/2016] [Indexed: 01/08/2023] Open
Abstract
Cognitive function evolves significantly over development, enabling flexible control of human behavior. Yet, how these functions are instantiated in spatially distributed and dynamically interacting networks, or graphs, that change in structure from childhood to adolescence is far from understood. Here we applied a novel machine-learning method to track continuously overlapping and time-varying subgraphs in the brain at rest within a sample of 200 healthy youth (ages 8-11 and 19-22) drawn from the Philadelphia Neurodevelopmental Cohort. We uncovered a set of subgraphs that capture surprisingly integrated and dynamically changing interactions among known cognitive systems. We observed that subgraphs that were highly expressed were especially transient, flexibly switching between high and low expression over time. This transience was particularly salient in a subgraph predominantly linking frontoparietal regions of the executive system, which increases in both expression and flexibility from childhood to young adulthood. Collectively, these results suggest that healthy development is accompanied by an increasing precedence of executive networks and a greater switching of the regions and interactions subserving these networks.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lucy R. Chai
- Department of Bioengineering, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104 USA
| | - Ankit N. Khambhati
- Department of Bioengineering, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104 USA
| | - Rastko Ciric
- Brain Behavior Laboratory, Department of Psychiatry, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104 USA
| | - Tyler M. Moore
- Brain Behavior Laboratory, Department of Psychiatry, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104 USA
| | - Ruben C. Gur
- Brain Behavior Laboratory, Department of Psychiatry, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104 USA
| | - Raquel E. Gur
- Brain Behavior Laboratory, Department of Psychiatry, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104 USA
| | - Theodore D. Satterthwaite
- Brain Behavior Laboratory, Department of Psychiatry, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104 USA
| | - Danielle S. Bassett
- Department of Bioengineering, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104 USA
- Department of Electrical & Systems Engineering, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104 USA
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Khambhati AN, Bassett DS, Oommen BS, Chen SH, Lucas TH, Davis KA, Litt B. Recurring Functional Interactions Predict Network Architecture of Interictal and Ictal States in Neocortical Epilepsy. eNeuro 2017; 4:ENEURO.0091-16.2017. [PMID: 28303256 PMCID: PMC5343278 DOI: 10.1523/eneuro.0091-16.2017] [Citation(s) in RCA: 34] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/25/2016] [Revised: 01/09/2017] [Accepted: 01/10/2017] [Indexed: 01/10/2023] Open
Abstract
Human epilepsy patients suffer from spontaneous seizures, which originate in brain regions that also subserve normal function. Prior studies demonstrate focal, neocortical epilepsy is associated with dysfunction, several hours before seizures. How does the epileptic network perpetuate dysfunction during baseline periods? To address this question, we developed an unsupervised machine learning technique to disentangle patterns of functional interactions between brain regions, or subgraphs, from dynamic functional networks constructed from approximately 100 h of intracranial recordings in each of 22 neocortical epilepsy patients. Using this approach, we found: (1) subgraphs from ictal (seizure) and interictal (baseline) epochs are topologically similar, (2) interictal subgraph topology and dynamics can predict brain regions that generate seizures, and (3) subgraphs undergo slower and more coordinated fluctuations during ictal epochs compared to interictal epochs. Our observations suggest that seizures mark a critical shift away from interictal states that is driven by changes in the dynamical expression of strongly interacting components of the epileptic network.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ankit N. Khambhati
- Department of Bioengineering, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104
- Penn Center for Neuroengineering and Therapeutics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104
| | - Danielle S. Bassett
- Department of Bioengineering, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104
- Penn Center for Neuroengineering and Therapeutics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104
- Department of Electrical and Systems Engineering, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104
| | - Brian S. Oommen
- Penn Center for Neuroengineering and Therapeutics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104
- Department of Neurology, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104
| | - Stephanie H. Chen
- Penn Center for Neuroengineering and Therapeutics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104
- Department of Neurology, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104
| | - Timothy H. Lucas
- Penn Center for Neuroengineering and Therapeutics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104
- Department of Neurosurgery, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104
| | - Kathryn A. Davis
- Penn Center for Neuroengineering and Therapeutics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104
- Department of Neurology, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104
| | - Brian Litt
- Department of Bioengineering, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104
- Penn Center for Neuroengineering and Therapeutics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104
- Department of Neurology, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Khambhati AN, Davis KA, Lucas TH, Litt B, Bassett DS. Virtual Cortical Resection Reveals Push-Pull Network Control Preceding Seizure Evolution. Neuron 2016; 91:1170-1182. [PMID: 27568515 PMCID: PMC5017915 DOI: 10.1016/j.neuron.2016.07.039] [Citation(s) in RCA: 128] [Impact Index Per Article: 16.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/08/2016] [Revised: 05/31/2016] [Accepted: 07/22/2016] [Indexed: 12/17/2022]
Abstract
In ∼20 million people with drug-resistant epilepsy, focal seizures originating in dysfunctional brain networks will often evolve and spread to surrounding tissue, disrupting function in otherwise normal brain regions. To identify network control mechanisms that regulate seizure spread, we developed a novel tool for pinpointing brain regions that facilitate synchronization in the epileptic network. Our method measures the impact of virtually resecting putative control regions on synchronization in a validated model of the human epileptic network. By applying our technique to time-varying functional networks, we identified brain regions whose topological role is to synchronize or desynchronize the epileptic network. Our results suggest that greater antagonistic push-pull interaction between synchronizing and desynchronizing brain regions better constrains seizure spread. These methods, while applied here to epilepsy, are generalizable to other brain networks and have wide applicability in isolating and mapping functional drivers of brain dynamics in health and disease.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ankit N Khambhati
- Department of Bioengineering, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA; Center for Neuroengineering and Therapeutics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA
| | - Kathryn A Davis
- Center for Neuroengineering and Therapeutics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA; Department of Neurology, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA
| | - Timothy H Lucas
- Center for Neuroengineering and Therapeutics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA; Department of Neurosurgery, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA
| | - Brian Litt
- Department of Bioengineering, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA; Center for Neuroengineering and Therapeutics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA; Department of Neurology, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA
| | - Danielle S Bassett
- Department of Bioengineering, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA; Center for Neuroengineering and Therapeutics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA; Department of Electrical and Systems Engineering, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Khambhati AN, Davis KA, Oommen BS, Chen SH, Lucas TH, Litt B, Bassett DS. Dynamic Network Drivers of Seizure Generation, Propagation and Termination in Human Neocortical Epilepsy. PLoS Comput Biol 2015; 11:e1004608. [PMID: 26680762 PMCID: PMC4682976 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1004608] [Citation(s) in RCA: 129] [Impact Index Per Article: 14.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/02/2015] [Accepted: 10/16/2015] [Indexed: 12/16/2022] Open
Abstract
The epileptic network is characterized by pathologic, seizure-generating 'foci' embedded in a web of structural and functional connections. Clinically, seizure foci are considered optimal targets for surgery. However, poor surgical outcome suggests a complex relationship between foci and the surrounding network that drives seizure dynamics. We developed a novel technique to objectively track seizure states from dynamic functional networks constructed from intracranial recordings. Each dynamical state captures unique patterns of network connections that indicate synchronized and desynchronized hubs of neural populations. Our approach suggests that seizures are generated when synchronous relationships near foci work in tandem with rapidly changing desynchronous relationships from the surrounding epileptic network. As seizures progress, topographical and geometrical changes in network connectivity strengthen and tighten synchronous connectivity near foci-a mechanism that may aid seizure termination. Collectively, our observations implicate distributed cortical structures in seizure generation, propagation and termination, and may have practical significance in determining which circuits to modulate with implantable devices.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ankit N. Khambhati
- Department of Bioengineering, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States of America
- Penn Center for Neuroengineering and Therapeutics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States of America
| | - Kathryn A. Davis
- Penn Center for Neuroengineering and Therapeutics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States of America
- Department of Neurology, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States of America
| | - Brian S. Oommen
- Penn Center for Neuroengineering and Therapeutics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States of America
- Department of Neurology, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States of America
| | - Stephanie H. Chen
- Penn Center for Neuroengineering and Therapeutics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States of America
- Department of Neurology, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States of America
| | - Timothy H. Lucas
- Penn Center for Neuroengineering and Therapeutics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States of America
- Department of Neurosurgery, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States of America
| | - Brian Litt
- Department of Bioengineering, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States of America
- Penn Center for Neuroengineering and Therapeutics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States of America
- Department of Neurology, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States of America
| | - Danielle S. Bassett
- Department of Bioengineering, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States of America
- Penn Center for Neuroengineering and Therapeutics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States of America
- Department of Electrical and Systems Engineering, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States of America
| |
Collapse
|