Green chromatographic methods for determination of co-formulated lidocaine hydrochloride and miconazole nitrate along with an endocrine disruptor preservative and potential impurity

Recently, green analytical chemistry (GAC) is a key issue towards the idea of sustainability, the analytical community is focused on developing analytical methods that incorporate green chemistry principles to minimize adverse impacts on the environment and humans. Herein, we present 2 sustainable, selective, and validated chromatographic methods. Initially, lidocaine hydrochloride (LDC) and miconazole nitrate (MIC) with two preservatives; methyl paraben (MTP) and saccharin sodium (SAC) were chromatographed via TLC-densitometric method which employed ethyl acetate: methanol: formic acid (9:1:0.1, by volume) as the mobile phase with UV detection at 220.0 nm, good correlation was obtained in the range of 0.3-3.0 µg/band for MIC and LDC. Following that, RP-HPLC was successfully applied for separating quinary mixture of LDC, MIC, MTP, SAC along with LDC impurity; dimethyl aniline (DMA) using C18 column, and a gradient green mobile phase composed of methanol and phosphate buffer (pH 6.0) in different ratios with a flow rate 1.5 mL/min and UV detection at 210.0 nm, linearity ranges from 1.00 to 100.00 µg/mL for MIC, 2.00-100.00 µg/mL for LDC and 1.00--20.00 µg/mL for MTP and DMA. No records to date regarding the determination of the two drugs, besides MTP and DMA. The proposed methods were validated according to the ICH guidelines and applied successfully to the analysis of the compounds. The methods' results were statistically compared to those obtained by applying the reported one, indicating no significant difference regarding both accuracy and precision. The methods' greenness profiles have been assessed and compared with those of the reported method using different assessment tools.

Green spectrophotometric methods for the determination of a binary mixture of lidocaine hydrochloride and cetylpyridinium chloride in the presence of dimethylaniline

Three green, simple, precise, accurate and sensitive spectrophotometric methods were developed for the determination of a binary mixture of lidocaine hydrochloride (LDC) and cetylpyridinium chloride (CPC) in the presence of dimethylaniline (DMA). In the three methods, the interference of DMA spectrum is eliminated using the ratio subtraction method. Method (A) depended on determining LDC and CPC by measuring the first derivative of the ratio spectra (¹DD) at 271.0 and 268.4 nm, respectively. Method (B) was the ratio difference (RD), based on dividing the absorption spectrum of the binary mixture by a standard spectrum of CPC or LDC, then measuring the amplitude difference of the ratio spectra (∆P) between 231.2 and 240.0 nm for LDC and between 242.8 and 258.0 nm for CPC. Method (C) based on the application of dual wavelength coupled with the isoabsorptive point method. This was achieved by measuring the absorbance difference (∆A) between 243.0 and 268.6 nm for the determination of LDC, followed by application of isoabsorptive point method comprised of measurement the total content of the mixture of LDC and CPC at their isoabsorptive point at 240.0 nm. The content of CPC was obtained by subtraction. The specificity of the developed methods was investigated by analyzing laboratory prepared mixtures containing different ratios of LDC and CPC in presence of DMA. The proposed methods displayed useful analytical characteristics for the determination of LDC and CPC in bulk powder and their combined dosage form. The obtained results were statistically compared with those obtained by the official methods, showing no significant difference with respect to accuracy and precision.

Simultaneous Determination of Dexpanthenol, Lidocaine Hydrochloride, Mepyramine Maleate and their Related Substances by a RP-HPLC Method in Topical Dosage Forms

The pharmaceutical combination of dexpanthenol (DPA), lidocaine hydrochloride (LIH) and mepyramine maleate (MAM) is used for their anti-allergic, anti-inflammatory, anti-pruritic, anesthetic and antiseptic properties. The present study was aimed to develop and validate a new, first and rapid high performance liquid chromatographic method for simultaneous determination of DPA, LIH and MAM in the presence of their stress-induced degradation products in pharmaceutical gel/fluigel formulations. The chromatographic separation was performed on an Inertsil ODS-3 V, 250 × 4.6 mm (5 μm) column using a gradient mobile phase of an aqueous solution of ammonium acetate (0.01 M) and methanol mixture at gradient flow rates of 1.3 mL/min and 1.5 mL/min with detection at 230 nm. The retention times for DPA, LIH and MAM were ~3.28 min, 11.67 min and 12.99 min, respectively. The method was validated in accordance with International Conference on Harmonisation guidelines. Calibration curves were linear in the ranges of 9-54 μg/mL for MAM and LIH and 30-180 μg/mL for DPA with satisfactory correlation coefficients (R2 > 0.999). The mean % recoveries obtained were found to be 99.9% for MAM, 100.3% for LIH and 99.3% for DPA. Precision % RSD was <2. Robustness results were uniform, there were no marked changes, so method is highly validated. All drugs were subjected to stress conditions and degradation products were separated with acceptable peak tailing (T ≤ 2) and good resolution (Rs > 2). The validated method therefore can be adapted for quality control procedures of the drugs in pharmaceutical dosage forms and their stability studies.

Structural confirmation of sulconazole sulfoxide as the primary degradation product of sulconazole nitrate

Sulconazole has been reported to degrade into sulconazole sulfoxide via sulfur oxidation; however, structural characterization data was lacking and the potential formation of an N-oxide or sulfone could not be excluded. To clarify the degradation pathways and incorporate the impurity profile of sulconazole into the United States Pharmacopeia–National Formulary (USP–NF) monographs, a multifaceted approach was utilized to confirm the identity of the degradant. The approach combines stress testing of sulconazole nitrate, chemical synthesis of the degradant via a hydrogen peroxide-mediated oxidation reaction, semi-preparative HPLC purification, and structural elucidation by LC–MS/MS and NMR spectroscopy. Structural determination was primarily based on the comparison of spectroscopic data of sulconazole and the oxidative degradant. The mass spectrometric data have revealed a McLafferty-type rearrangement as the characteristic fragmentation pathway for alkyl sulfoxides with a β-hydrogen atom, and was used to distinguish the sulfoxide from N-oxide or sulfone derivatives. Moreover, the generated sulconazole sulfoxide was utilized as reference material for compendial procedure development and validation, which provides support for USP monograph modernization.

Chromatographic Determination of Aminoacridine Hydrochloride, Lidocaine Hydrochloride and Lidocaine Toxic Impurity in Oral Gel

Two sensitive and selective analytical methods were developed for simultaneous determination of aminoacridine hydrochloride and lidocaine hydrochloride in bulk powder and pharmaceutical formulation. Method A was based on HPLC separation of the cited drugs with determination of the toxic lidocaine-related impurity 2,6-dimethylaniline. The separation was achieved using reversed-phase column C18, 250 × 4.6 mm, 5 µm particle size and mobile phase consisting of 0.05 M disodium hydrogen phosphate dihydrate (pH 6.0 ± 0.2 adjusted with phosphoric acid) and acetonitrile (55 : 45, v/v). Quantitation was achieved with UV detection at 240 nm. Linear calibration curve was in the range of 1.00-10.00, 13.20-132.00 and 1.32-13.20 µg mL(-1) for aminoacridine hydrochloride, lidocaine hydrochloride and 2,6-dimethylaniline, respectively. Method B was based on TLC separation of the cited drugs followed by densitometric measurement at 365 nm on the fluorescent mode for aminoacridine hydrochloride and 220 nm on the absorption mode for lidocaine hydrochloride. The separation was carried out using ethyl acetate-methanol-acetic acid (65 : 30 : 5 by volume) as a developing system. The calibration curve was in the range of 25.00-250.00 ng spot(-1) and 0.99-9.90 µg spot(-1) for aminoacridine hydrochloride and lidocaine hydrochloride, respectively. The results obtained were statistically analyzed and compared with those obtained by applying the manufacturer's method.

Validated RP-HPLC and TLC-Densitometric Methods for Analysis of Ternary Mixture of Cetylpyridinium Chloride, Chlorocresol and Lidocaine in Oral Antiseptic Formulation

This work was concerned with development, optimization, application and validation of reversed phase high performance liquid chromatography (RP-HPLC) and thin layer chromatography (TLC)-densitometric methods for analysis of cetylpyridinium chloride, chlorocresol and lidocaine in Canyon(®) gel. The first developed RP-HPLC method depended on chromatographic separation on a ZORBAX Eclipse Plus C8 column, with elution with a mobile phase consisting of 0.05% phosphoric acid solution : acetonitrile : methanol (15 : 24 : 61, by volume), pumping the mobile phase at a flow rate of 1.00 mL min(-1), with ultraviolet detection at 220 nm. While in the subsequently developed method, the TLC-densitometric method, complete separation of the studied mixture was achieved using methanol : acetone : acetic acid (7 : 3 : 0.2, by volume) as a mobile phase, aluminum plates precoated with silica gel 60 F254 as a stationary phase and 215 nm as the scanning wavelength. Factors affecting the developed methods were studied and optimized; moreover, methods had been validated as per the International Conference of Harmonization guideline and the results indicated that the suggested methods were reproducible, reliable and applicable for rapid routine analysis. Statistical comparison of the two developed methods with the reported HPLC ones using F- and Student's t tests showed no significant difference.