The WHO fungal priority pathogens list: a crucial reappraisal to review the prioritisation

In October, 2022, WHO published the first fungal priority pathogen list, which categorised 19 fungal entities into three priority groups (critical, high, and medium), for prioritisation of research efforts. The final ranking was determined via multiple criteria decision analysis, considering both research and development needs and perceived public health importance. In this Personal View, we discuss the positioning of the fungal pathogens, namely, Mucorales, Candida spp, Histoplasma spp, Coccidioides and Paracoccidioides spp, Fusarium spp, eumycetoma causative agents, Talaromyces marneffei, and Pneumocystis jirovecii, while expressing concerns about potential disparities between the WHO fungal priority pathogen list ranking and the actual disease burden associated with these pathogens. Finally, we propose a revised prioritisation list that also considers the regional disparities in the burden of fungal diseases.

Risk factors for Pneumocystis jirovecii pneumonia after kidney transplantation: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

Pneumocystis jirovecii pneumonia (PJP), an opportunistic infection, often leads to an increase in hospitalization time and mortality rates in kidney transplant (KT) recipients. However, the risk factors associated with PJP in KT recipients remain debatable. Therefore, we conducted this meta-analysis to identify risk factors for PJP, which could potentially help to reduce PJP incidence and improve outcome of KT recipients.

METHODS

We systematically retrieved relevant studies in PubMed, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library up to November 2023. Pooled odds ratios (ORs) or mean differences (MDs) and the corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated to assess the impact of potential risk factors on the occurrence of PJP.

RESULTS

27 studies including 42383 KT recipients were included. In this meta-analysis, age at transplantation (MD = 3.48; 95% CI = .56-6.41; p = .02), cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection (OR = 4.00; 95% CI = 2.53-6.32; p = .001), BK viremia (OR = 3.38; 95% CI = 1.70-6.71; p = .001), acute rejection (OR = 3.66; 95% CI = 2.44-5.49; p = .001), ABO-incompatibility (OR = 2.51; 95% CI = 1.57-4.01; p = .001), estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) (MD = -14.52; 95% CI = -25.37- (-3.67); p = .009), lymphocyte count (MD = -.54; 95% CI = -.92- (-.16); p = .006) and anti-PJP prophylaxis (OR = .53; 95% CI = .28-.98; p = .04) were significantly associated with PJP occurrence.

CONCLUSION

Our findings suggest that transplantation age greater than 50 years old, CMV infection, BK viremia, acute rejection, ABO-incompatibility, decreased eGFR and lymphopenia were risk factors for PJP.

Beyond the First Year: Epidemiology and Management of Late-Onset Opportunistic Infections After Kidney Transplantation

Late opportunistic infections (OI) occurring beyond the first year after kidney transplantation (KT) are poorly described and not targeted by prophylactic strategies. We performed a ten-year retrospective monocentric cohort study describing epidemiology, risk factors and impact of late OI occurring 1 year after KT. We included clinically symptomatic OI requiring treatment besides BK virus nephropathy. Control groups included early OI occurring in the first year after KT, and KT recipients without OI since KT and alive with a functional allograft at 1 year. Among 1066 KT recipients, 185 (19.4%) presented a first episode of OI 21.0 (8.0-45.0) months after KT: 120 late OI (64.9%) and 65 early OI (35.1%). Late OI were mainly viral (N = 83, 69.2%), mostly herpes zoster (HZ) (N = 36, 43.4%). Pneumocystis represented most late fungal infections (N = 12/25, 48%). Compared to early OI, we reported more pneumocystis (p = 0.002) and less invasive aspergillosis (p = 0.01) among late OI. Patients with late OI were significatively younger at KT (54.0 ± 13.3 vs. 60.2 ± 14.3 years, p = 0.05). Patient and allograft survival rates between late OI and control groups were similar. Only age was independently associated with mortality. While late OI were not associated with higher mortality or graft loss, implementing prophylactic strategies might prevent such infections.

Trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole significantly reduces the risk of nocardiosis in solid organ transplant recipients: systematic review and individual patient data meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Whether trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (TMP-SMX) prophylaxis prevents nocardiosis in solid organ transplant (SOT) recipients is controversial.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the effect of TMP-SMX in the prevention of nocardiosis after SOT, its dose-response relationship, its effect on preventing disseminated nocardiosis, and the risk of TMP-SMX resistance in case of breakthrough infection.

METHODS

A systematic review and individual patient data meta-analysis.

DATA SOURCES

MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, Web of Science Core Collection, and Scopus up to 19 September 2023.

STUDY ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA

(a) Risk of nocardiosis between SOT recipients with and without TMP-SMX prophylaxis, or (b) sufficient details to determine the rate of TMP-SMX resistance in breakthrough nocardiosis.

PARTICIPANTS

SOT recipients.

INTERVENTION

TMP-SMX prophylaxis versus no prophylaxis.

ASSESSMENT OF RISK OF BIAS

Risk Of Bias In Non-randomized Studies-of Exposure (ROBINS-E) for comparative studies; dedicated tool for non-comparative studies.

METHODS OF DATA SYNTHESIS

For our primary outcome (i.e. to determine the effect of TMP-SMX on the risk of nocardiosis), a one-step mixed-effects regression model was used to estimate the association between the outcome and the exposure. Univariate and multivariable unconditional regression models were used to adjust for the potential confounding effects. Certainty of evidence was assessed using Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) approach.

RESULTS

Individual data from three case-control studies were obtained (260 SOT recipients with nocardiosis and 519 uninfected controls). TMP-SMX prophylaxis was independently associated with a significantly decreased risk of nocardiosis (adjusted OR = 0.3, 95% CI 0.18-0.52, moderate certainty of evidence). Variables independently associated with an increased risk of nocardiosis were older age, current use of corticosteroids, high calcineurin inhibitor concentration, recent acute rejection, lower lymphocyte count, and heart transplant. Breakthrough infections (66/260, 25%) were generally susceptible to TMP-SMX (pooled proportion 98%, 95% CI 92-100).

CONCLUSIONS

In SOT recipients, TMP-SMX prophylaxis likely reduces the risk of nocardiosis. Resistance appears uncommon in case of breakthrough infection.

CMV Infection and Lymphopenia: Warning Markers of Pneumocystis Pneumonia in Kidney Transplant Recipients

Pneumocystis pneumonia (PcP) remains life-threatening in kidney transplant recipients (KTR). Our study investigated risk factors one-year before PcP. We conducted a monocentric, case-control study including all KTR at the Dijon University Hospital (France) with a diagnosis of PcP between 2005 and 2022 (cases), and matched control KTR with no history of PcP (3 controls/case). Among all 1,135 KTR, 57 cases (5%) and 169 matched-controls were included. PcP was associated with 18% mortality. Compared to controls, cases were older, with a higher immunological risk, and CMV infection was more frequent in the year preceding the occurrence of PcP (23% vs. 4%; p < 0.001). As early as 1 year before PcP, lymphocyte counts were lower and serum creatinine levels were higher in cases, but immunosuppressive regimens were not significantly different. Multivariable analysis identified lymphocyte count, serum creatinine level, being treated by immunosuppressive therapy other than anti-rejection drugs, and CMV infection in the year preceding the time PcP as independently associated with the occurrence of PcP. PcP was associated with an increased risk of subsequent chronic rejection (27% vs. 3%; p = 0.001) and return to dialysis (20% vs. 3%; p = 0.002). The occurrence of CMV infection and a low lymphocyte count could redefine the indications for continuation or reinitiation of anti-Pneumocystis prophylaxis.

Clinical characteristics and risk factors for late-onset pneumocystis jirovecii pneumonia in kidney transplantation recipients

BACKGROUND

Pneumocystis jirovecii pneumonia (PJP) is a common and troublesome complication of kidney transplantation. In the era of prophylaxis, the peak incidence of PJP after kidney transplantation and specific characteristics of late-onset PJP have always been debated.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective study by analysing the data of post-transplantation pneumonia in adult kidney transplantation recipients between March 2014 and December 2021 in The Affiliated First Hospital of University of Science and Technology of China (USTC). A total of 361 patients were included and divided into early-onset PJP, late-onset PJP and non-PJP groups. The characteristics of each group and related risk factors for the late-onset patients were investigated.

RESULTS

Some patients developed PJP 9 months later with a second higher occurrence between month 10 and 15 after transplantation. Compared with non-PJP, ABO-incompatible and cytomegalovirus (CMV) viremia were significantly associated with late onset of PJP in multivariate analysis. The use of tacrolimus, CMV viremia, elevated CD8(+) T cell percent and hypoalbuminemia were risk factors for late PJP. Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis demonstrated that a combination of those factors could increase the sensitivity of prediction remarkably, with an area under the curve of 0.82, a sensitivity of 80% and a specificity of 83%.

CONCLUSIONS

PJP could occur months after kidney transplantation. ABO-incompatible transplant recipients are at high risk of PJP. In the later stages of transplantation, CMV viremia, T lymphocyte subsets percentage and serum albumin levels should be monitored in patients using tacrolimus.

Successful management of concurrent COVID-19 and Pneumocystis Jirovecii Pneumonia in kidney transplant recipients: a case series

BACKGROUND

Pneumocystis pneumonia (PCP) is a life-threatening pulmonary fungal infection that predominantly affects immunocompromised individuals, including kidney transplant recipients. Recent years have witnessed a rising incidence of PCP in this vulnerable population, leading to graft loss and increased mortality. Immunosuppression, which is essential in transplant recipients, heightens susceptibility to viral and opportunistic infections, magnifying the clinical challenge. Concurrently, the global impact of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), caused by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), has been profound. Kidney transplant recipients have faced severe outcomes when infected with SARS-CoV-2, often requiring intensive care. Co-infection with COVID-19 and PCP in this context represents a complex clinical scenario that requires precise management strategies, involving a delicate balance between immunosuppression and immune activation. Although there have been case reports on management of COVID-19 and PCP in kidney transplant recipients, guidance on how to tackle these infections when they occur concurrently remains limited.

CASE PRESENTATIONS

We have encountered four kidney transplant recipients with concurrent COVID-19 and PCP infection. These patients received comprehensive treatment that included adjustment of their maintenance immunosuppressive regimen, anti-pneumocystis therapy, treatment for COVID-19 and other infections, and symptomatic and supportive care. After this multifaceted treatment strategy, all of these patients improved significantly and had favorable outcomes.

CONCLUSIONS

We have successfully managed four kidney transplant recipients co-infected with COVID-19 and PCP. While PCP is a known complication of immunosuppressive therapy, its incidence in patients with COVID-19 highlights the complexity of dual infections. Our findings suggest that tailored immunosuppressive regimens, coupled with antiviral and antimicrobial therapies, can lead to clinical improvement in such cases. Further research is needed to refine risk assessment and therapeutic strategies, which will ultimately enhance the care of this vulnerable population.

Indication for a Pneumocystis Prophylaxis Therapy in Patients with Vascular Anomalies Treated with PIK3/AKT/mTOR Pathway Inhibitors: Experts' Opinion and Systematic Review from the Literature

BACKGROUND

Vascular anomalies (VAs) are increasingly being treated with PI3K/AKT/mTOR pathway inhibitors. These drugs have immunosuppressive properties and thus theoretically overexpose patients to opportunistic infections, especially Pneumocystis jirovecii pneumonia (PJP). PJP prophylaxis use lacks consensus. We aimed to investigate the prevalence of PJP in patients receiving mTOR/PI3K/AKT inhibitors for VAs and determine any indication for pneumocystis prophylaxis in this population.

METHODS

The study was conducted in 2 parts: (1) we sent a survey to a panel of international experts of VAs asking about their use of pneumocystis prophylaxis drugs and (2) we performed a systematic review of the literature of all published cases of patients receiving these drugs for VA to estimate the prevalence of PJP in this population.

RESULTS

Answers from 68 experts were analyzed: 21 (30.9%) answered they always add PJP prophylaxis when prescribing mTOR inhibitors, 20 (29.4%) case-by-case, and 27 (39.7%) never. For the systematic review, among 3,053 reports screened, 217 were included involving 1,189 patients (1,143 received sirolimus, 38 everolimus, 4 alpelisib, 4 miransertib). Among the 1,189 cases, 2 (0.2%) PJP were reported: one under sirolimus and one under everolimus. Thus, the prevalence of PJP was estimated at 0.88 cases/1,000 patients under sirolimus (95% CI: -0.84 to 2.59) and 26.31 cases/1,000 under everolimus (95% CI: -24.58 to 77.18). Patients with PJP never received prophylaxis drugs. We found no PJP cases under alpelisib and miransertib. PJP prophylaxis was given in 218 (18.3%) cases, more frequently for children (91.3 vs. 77.2% in the non-prophylaxis group, p = 0.012), mostly trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (186 patients, 85.3%).

CONCLUSION

Our study shows that even if PJP is a rare event, it may occur in patients with VAs treated with an mTOR inhibitor. Although our results cannot allow for revising guidelines, prophylaxis with TMP-SMX might be appropriate for a subgroup of patients with risk factors for PJP.

Risk factors and outcomes of Pneumocystis pneumonia in solid organ transplant recipients: Impact of posttransplant lymphoproliferative disorder

BACKGROUND

Pneumocystis jirovecii pneumonia (PJP) is a potentially fatal infection afflicting the immunocompromised population, including solid organ transplant (SOT) recipients. Several risk factors have been described; however, little is known regarding the risk of PJP in SOT recipients with posttransplant lymphoproliferative disorder (PTLD).

METHODS

We performed a nested case-control study of SOT recipients diagnosed with PJP from 2000 to 2020. PJP was defined as positive microscopy or polymerase chain reaction testing with compatible symptoms and radiographic findings. Control patients were matched 2:1 by year of first transplant, first transplanted organ, transplant center, and sex. Multivariable conditional logistic regression was performed to test associations with PJP and Cox regression analyzed post-PJP outcomes.

RESULTS

Sixty-seven PJP cases were matched to 134 controls. The most common transplant was kidney (55.2%). Fourteen patients had a history of PTLD, 12 of whom developed PJP. After adjusting for age, acute rejection, cytomegalovirus infection, PJP prophylaxis, and lymphopenia (lymphocyte count < .5 × 109 /L), PTLD was independently associated with PJP (OR 14.0, 95% CI 1.7-114.5; p = .014). Lymphopenia was also a significant association (OR 8.2, 95% CI 3.2-20.7; p < .001). PJP was associated with mortality within 90 days of diagnosis (p < .001), but not after 90 days (p = .317). PJP was also associated with 90-day death-censored renal allograft loss (p = .026).

CONCLUSIONS

PTLD is independently associated with PJP after adjustment for recognized risk factors. This is likely influenced by PTLD-directed chemotherapy, particularly rituximab-containing regimens. PJP is associated with early mortality, but this effect is not persistent after 90 days. PJP prophylaxis should be considered in SOT recipients with PTLD.

Current Concepts in the Diagnosis and Management of Pneumocystis Pneumonia in Solid Organ Transplantation

Pneumocystis infection manifests predominantly as an interstitial pneumonia in immunocompromised patients. Diagnostic testing in the appropriate clinical context can be highly sensitive and specific and involves radiographic imaging, fungal biomarkers, nucleic acid amplification, histopathology, and lung fluid or tissue sampling. Trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole remains the first-choice agent for treatment and prophylaxis. Investigation continues to promote a deeper understanding of the pathogen's ecology, epidemiology, host susceptibility, and optimal treatment and prevention strategies in solid organ transplant recipients.

How to diagnose and treat a non-HIV patient with Pneumocystis jirovecii pneumonia (PCP)?

BACKGROUND

Pneumocystis jirovecii Pneumonia (PCP) incidence is increasing in non-HIV infected patients. In contrast to PCP in patients infected with HIV, diagnosis is often delayed, and illness is associated with an increased mortality.

OBJECTIVE

To provide a comprehensive review of clinical presentation, risk factors, diagnostic strategies, and treatment options of PCP in non-HIV-infected patients.

SOURCES

Web-based literature review on PCP for trials, meta-analyses and systematic reviews using PubMed. Restriction to English language was applied.

CONTENT

Common underlying conditions in non-HIV-infected patients with PCP are haematological malignancies, autoimmune and inflammatory diseases, solid organ or haematopoietic stem cell transplant and prior exposure to corticosteroids. New risk groups include patients receiving monoclonal antibodies and immunomodulating therapies. Non-HIV-infected patients with PCP present with rapid onset and progression of pneumonia, increased duration of hospitalization and a significantly higher mortality rate than patients infected with HIV. PCP is diagnosed by a combination of clinical symptoms, radiological and mycological features. Immunofluorescence microscopy from bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) or PCR testing CT imaging and evaluation of the clinical presentation are required. The established treatment regime consists of trimethoprim and sulfamethoxazole.

IMPLICATIONS

While the number of patients immunosuppressed for other causes than HIV is increasing, a simultaneous rise in PCP incidence is observed. In the group of non-HIV-infected patients, a rapid onset of symptoms, a more complex course, and a higher mortality rate are recorded. Therefore, time to diagnosis must be as short as possible to initiate effective therapy promptly. This review aims to raise awareness of PCP in an increasingly affected at-risk group and provide clinicians with a practical guide for efficient diagnosis and targeted therapy. Furthermore, it intends to display current inadequacies in research on the topic of PCP.

Interest of a Commercialized Pneumocystis jirovecii Quantitative PCR to Discriminate Colonization from Pneumocystis Pneumonia according to the Revised EORTC/MSGERC Criteria

Quantitative PCR (qPCR) is highly sensitive to diagnose Pneumocystis jirovecii (Pj) pneumonia (PCP). However, differentiating PCP and colonization remains difficult. This study aimed to establish the performances of the commercialized qPCR MycoGENIE® Pj kit (Ademtech) to distinguish PCP and Pj colonization. Patients with a positive Pj qPCR on bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) or upper respiratory tract (URT) samples were prospectively included between May 2019 and December 2020 at Bordeaux University Hospital. They were classified in “PCP” or “Pj colonization” groups based on the revised EORTC/MSGERC criteria. The two groups’ results were compared; ROC curves were produced to determine the best thresholds. Excluding the low number of HIV-positive subjects, there were 100 PCP (32 BAL, 68 URT) and 70 Pj colonization (34 BAL, 36 URT). Pj loads were significantly higher in PCP compared to Pj colonization group (p ≤ 0.01). The best cut-offs for PCP diagnosis were 31.45 Cq/8275 copies/mL for BAL and 32.33 Cq/8130 copies/mL for URT (sensitivity = 59.4%, 63.3%, specificity = 82.4%, 88.9%, respectively). Fungal load quantification using MycoGENIE® Pj qPCR helps discriminating PCP from colonization, high fungal loads being indicative of probable PCP. Low load results should be interpreted with caution, in accordance with clinical and radiological signs.

A comprehensive clinical guide for Pneumocystis jirovecii pneumonia: a missing therapeutic target in HIV-uninfected patients

INTRODUCTION

Pneumocystis jirovecii is an opportunistic, human-specific fungus that causes Pneumocystis pneumonia (PCP). PCP symptoms are nonspecific. A patient with P. jirovecii and another lung infection faces a diagnostic challenge. It may be difficult to determine which of these agents is responsible for the clinical symptoms, preventing effective treatment. Diagnostic and treatment efforts have been made more difficult by the rising frequency with which coronavirus 2019 (COVID-19) and PCP co-occur.

AREAS COVERED

Herein, we provide a comprehensive review of clinical and pharmacological recommendations along with a literature review of PCP in immunocompromised patients focusing on HIV-uninfected patients.

EXPERT OPINION

PCP may be masked by identifying co-existing pathogens that are not necessarily responsible for the observed infection. Patients with severe form COVID-19 should be examined for underlying immunodeficiency, and co-infections must be considered as co-infection with P. jirovecii may worsen COVID-19's severity and fatality. PCP should be investigated in patients with PCP risk factors who come with pneumonia and suggestive radiographic symptoms but have not previously received PCP prophylaxis. PCP prophylaxis should be explored in individuals with various conditions that impair the immune system, depending on their PCP risk.

Comparison of early and late Pneumocystis jirovecii Pneumonia in kidney transplant patients: the Korean Organ Transplantation Registry (KOTRY) Study

Late Pneumocystis jirovecii pneumonia (PJP) is not rare in the era of universal prophylaxis after kidney transplantation. We aimed to determine the nationwide status of PJP prophylaxis in Korea and compare the incidence, risk factors, and outcomes of early and late PJP using data from the Korean Organ Transplantation Registry (KOTRY), a nationwide Korean transplant cohort. We conducted a retrospective analysis using data of 4,839 kidney transplant patients from KOTRY between 2014 and 2018, excluding patients who received multi-organ transplantation or were under 18 years old. Cox regression analysis was performed to determine risk factors for early and late PJP. A total of 50 patients developed PJP. The number of patients who developed PJP was same between onset before 6 months and onsets after 6 months. There were no differences in the rate, duration, or dose of PJP prophylaxis between early and late PJP. Desensitization, higher tacrolimus dose at discharge, and acute rejection were associated with early PJP. In late PJP, old age as well as acute rejection were significant risk factors. In conclusion late PJP is as common and risky as early PJP and requires individualized risk-based prophylaxis, such as prolonged prophylaxis for old patients with a history of rejection.

Successful treatment of a kidney transplant patient with COVID-19 and late-onset Pneumocystis jirovecii pneumonia

Background

Solid transplant patients are susceptible to Pneumocystis jirovecii pneumonia (PJP). While the vast majority of PJP cases occur within the first 6 months after transplantation, very few PJP cases are seen beyond 1 year post-transplantation (late-onset PJP). PJP and coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19, caused by infection with SARS-CoV-2) share quite a few common clinical manifestations and imaging findings, making the diagnosis of PJP often underappreciated during the current COVID-19 pandemic. To date, only 1 case of kidney transplantation who developed COVID-19 and late-onset PJP has been reported, but this patient also suffered from many other infections and died from respiratory failure and multiple organ dysfunction syndrome. A successful treatment of kidney patients with COVID-19 and late-onset PJP has not been reported.

Case presentation

We present a case of a 55-year-old male kidney transplant patient with COVID-19 who also developed late-onset PJP. He received a combined treatment strategy, including specific anti-pneumocystis therapy, symptomatic supportive therapy, adjusted immunosuppressive therapy, and use of antiviral drugs/antibiotics, ending with a favorable outcome.

Conclusions

This case highlights the importance of prompt and differential diagnosis of PJP in kidney transplant patients with SARS-CoV-2 infection. Further studies are required to clarify if kidney transplant patients with COVID-19 could be prone to develop late-onset PJP and how these patients should be treated.

Current status of glucocorticoid usage in solid organ transplantation

Glucocorticoids (GCs) have been the mainstay of immunosuppressive therapy in solid organ transplantation (SOT) for decades, due to their potent effects on innate immunity and tissue protective effects. However, some SOT centers are reluctant to administer GCs long-term because of the various related side effects. This review summarizes the advantages and disadvantages of GCs in SOT. PubMed and Scopus databases were searched from 2011 to April 2021 using search syntaxes covering “transplantation” and “glucocorticoids”. GCs are used in transplant recipients, transplant donors, and organ perfusate solution to improve transplant outcomes. In SOT recipients, GCs are administered as induction and maintenance immunosuppressive therapy. GCs are also the cornerstone to treat acute antibody- and T-cell-mediated rejections. Addition of GCs to organ perfusate solution and pretreatment of transplant donors with GCs are recommended by some guidelines and protocols, to reduce ischemia-reperfusion injury peri-transplant. GCs with low bioavailability and high potency for GC receptors, such as budesonide, nanoparticle-mediated targeted delivery of GCs to specific organs, and combination use of dexamethasone with inducers of immune-regulatory cells, are new methods of GC application in SOT patients to reduce side effects or induce immune-tolerance instead of immunosuppression. Various side effects involving different non-targeted organs/tissues, such as bone, cardiovascular, neuromuscular, skin and gastrointestinal tract, have been noted for GCs. There are also potential drug-drug interactions for GCs in SOT patients.

Fungal pneumonia in kidney transplant recipients

Fungal pneumonia is a dreaded complication encountered after kidney transplantation, complicated by increased mortality and often associated with graft failure. Diagnosis can be challenging because the clinical presentation is non-specific and diagnostic tools have limited sensitivity and specificity in kidney transplant recipients and must be interpreted in the context of the clinical setting. Management is difficult due to the increased risk of dissemination and severity, multiple comorbidities, drug interactions and reduced immunosuppression which should be applied as an important adjunct to therapy. This review will focus on the main causes of fungal pneumonia in kidney transplant recipients including Pneumocystis, Aspergillus, Cryptococcus, mucormycetes and Histoplasma. Epidemiology, clinical presentation, laboratory and radiographic features, specific characteristics will be discussed with an update on diagnostic procedures and treatment.