1
|
Bass GA, Kaplan LJ, Ryan ÉJ, Cao Y, Lane-Fall M, Duffy CC, Vail EA, Mohseni S. The snapshot audit methodology: design, implementation and analysis of prospective observational cohort studies in surgery. Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg 2023; 49:5-15. [PMID: 35840703 PMCID: PMC10606835 DOI: 10.1007/s00068-022-02045-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/07/2022] [Accepted: 06/30/2022] [Indexed: 11/03/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE For some surgical conditionns and scientific questions, the "real world" effectiveness of surgical patient care may be better explored using a multi-institutional time-bound observational cohort assessment approach (termed a "snapshot audit") than by retrospective review of administrative datasets or by prospective randomized control trials. We discuss when this might be the case, and present the key features of developing, deploying, and assessing snapshot audit outcomes data. METHODS A narrative review of snapshot audit methodology was generated using the Scale for the Assessment of Narrative Review Articles (SANRA) guideline. Manuscripts were selected from domains including: audit design and deployment, statistical analysis, surgical therapy and technique, surgical outcomes, diagnostic testing, critical care management, concomitant non-surgical disease, implementation science, and guideline compliance. RESULTS Snapshot audits all conform to a similar structure: being time-bound, non-interventional, and multi-institutional. A successful diverse steering committee will leverage expertise that includes clinical care and data science, coupled with librarian services. Pre-published protocols (with specified aims and analyses) greatly helps site recruitment. Mentored trainee involvement at collaborating sites should be encouraged through manuscript contributorship. Current funding principally flows from medical professional organizations. CONCLUSION The snapshot audit approach to assessing current care provides insights into care delivery, outcomes, and guideline compliance while generating testable hypotheses.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gary A Bass
- Division of Trauma, Surgical Critical Care, and Emergency Surgery, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, 51 N. 39th Street, MOB 1, Suite 120, Philadelphia, PA, 19104, USA.
- Division of Trauma and Emergency Surgery, Orebro University Hospital and Faculty of School of Medical Sciences, Orebro University, 702 81, Orebro, Sweden.
- Penn Implementation Science Center at the Leonard Davis Institute of Health Economics (PISC-LDI), University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
- Center for Perioperative Outcomes Research and Transformation (CPORT), University of Pennsylvania, 3400 Spruce St, 5 Dulles, Philadelphia, PA, 19104, USA.
| | - Lewis J Kaplan
- Division of Trauma, Surgical Critical Care, and Emergency Surgery, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, 51 N. 39th Street, MOB 1, Suite 120, Philadelphia, PA, 19104, USA
- Corporal Michael J. Crescenz Veterans Affairs Medical Center, 3900 Woodland Avenue, Philadelphia, PA, 19104, USA
| | - Éanna J Ryan
- Division of Trauma and Emergency Surgery, Orebro University Hospital and Faculty of School of Medical Sciences, Orebro University, 702 81, Orebro, Sweden
- Department of Surgery, Tallaght University Hospital, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Yang Cao
- Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Orebro University, Orebro, Sweden
| | - Meghan Lane-Fall
- Penn Implementation Science Center at the Leonard Davis Institute of Health Economics (PISC-LDI), University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
- Center for Perioperative Outcomes Research and Transformation (CPORT), University of Pennsylvania, 3400 Spruce St, 5 Dulles, Philadelphia, PA, 19104, USA
- Department of Anesthesia and Critical Care, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, 423 Guardian Drive, 309 Blockley Hall, Philadelphia, PA, 19104, USA
| | - Caoimhe C Duffy
- Penn Implementation Science Center at the Leonard Davis Institute of Health Economics (PISC-LDI), University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
- Center for Perioperative Outcomes Research and Transformation (CPORT), University of Pennsylvania, 3400 Spruce St, 5 Dulles, Philadelphia, PA, 19104, USA
- Department of Anesthesia and Critical Care, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, 423 Guardian Drive, 309 Blockley Hall, Philadelphia, PA, 19104, USA
| | - Emily A Vail
- Penn Implementation Science Center at the Leonard Davis Institute of Health Economics (PISC-LDI), University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
- Center for Perioperative Outcomes Research and Transformation (CPORT), University of Pennsylvania, 3400 Spruce St, 5 Dulles, Philadelphia, PA, 19104, USA
- Department of Anesthesia and Critical Care, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, 423 Guardian Drive, 309 Blockley Hall, Philadelphia, PA, 19104, USA
| | - Shahin Mohseni
- Division of Trauma and Emergency Surgery, Orebro University Hospital and Faculty of School of Medical Sciences, Orebro University, 702 81, Orebro, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Prescott HC, Seelye S, Wang XQ, Hogan CK, Smith JT, Kipnis P, Barreda F, Donnelly JP, Pogue JM, Iwashyna TJ, Jones MM, Liu VX. Temporal Trends in Antimicrobial Prescribing During Hospitalization for Potential Infection and Sepsis. JAMA Intern Med 2022; 182:805-813. [PMID: 35759274 PMCID: PMC9237797 DOI: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2022.2291] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/10/2022] [Accepted: 04/28/2022] [Indexed: 12/19/2022]
Abstract
Importance Some experts have cautioned that national and health system emphasis on rapid administration of antimicrobials for sepsis may increase overall antimicrobial use even among patients without sepsis. Objective To assess whether temporal changes in antimicrobial timing for sepsis are associated with increasing antimicrobial use, days of therapy, or broadness of antimicrobial coverage among all hospitalized patients at risk for sepsis. Design, Setting, and Participants This is an observational cohort study of hospitalized patients at 152 hospitals in 2 health care systems during 2013 to 2018, admitted via the emergency department with 2 or more systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS) criteria. Data analysis was performed from June 10, 2021, to March 22, 2022. Exposures Hospital-level temporal trends in time to first antimicrobial administration. Outcomes Antimicrobial outcomes included antimicrobial use, days of therapy, and broadness of antibacterial coverage. Clinical outcomes included in-hospital mortality, 30-day mortality, length of hospitalization, and new multidrug-resistant (MDR) organism culture positivity. Results Among 1 559 523 patients admitted to the hospital via the emergency department with 2 or more SIRS criteria (1 269 998 male patients [81.4%]; median [IQR] age, 67 [59-77] years), 273 255 (17.5%) met objective criteria for sepsis. In multivariable models adjusted for patient characteristics, the adjusted median (IQR) time to first antimicrobial administration to patients with sepsis decreased by 37 minutes, from 4.7 (4.1-5.3) hours in 2013 to 3.9 (3.6-4.4) hours in 2018, although the slope of decrease varied across hospitals. During the same period, antimicrobial use within 48 hours, days of antimicrobial therapy, and receipt of broad-spectrum coverage decreased among the broader cohort of patients with SIRS. In-hospital mortality, 30-day mortality, length of hospitalization, new MDR culture positivity, and new MDR blood culture positivity decreased over the study period among both patients with sepsis and those with SIRS. When examining hospital-specific trends, decreases in antimicrobial use, days of therapy, and broadness of antibacterial coverage for patients with SIRS did not differ by hospital antimicrobial timing trend for sepsis. Overall, there was no evidence that accelerating antimicrobial timing for sepsis was associated with increasing antimicrobial use or impaired antimicrobial stewardship. Conclusions and Relevance In this multihospital cohort study, the time to first antimicrobial for sepsis decreased over time, but this trend was not associated with increasing antimicrobial use, days of therapy, or broadness of antimicrobial coverage among the broader population at-risk for sepsis, which suggests that shortening the time to antibiotics for sepsis is feasible without leading to indiscriminate antimicrobial use.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hallie C. Prescott
- Department of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor
- VA Center for Clinical Management Research, Ann Arbor, Michigan
| | - Sarah Seelye
- VA Center for Clinical Management Research, Ann Arbor, Michigan
| | - Xiao Qing Wang
- Department of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor
| | | | - Joshua T. Smith
- Division of Research, Kaiser Permanente Northern California, Oakland
| | - Patricia Kipnis
- Division of Research, Kaiser Permanente Northern California, Oakland
| | - Fernando Barreda
- Division of Research, Kaiser Permanente Northern California, Oakland
| | - John P. Donnelly
- Department of Learning Health Sciences, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor
| | - Jason M. Pogue
- Department of Clinical Pharmacy, University of Michigan College of Pharmacy, Ann Arbor
| | - Theodore J. Iwashyna
- Department of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor
- VA Center for Clinical Management Research, Ann Arbor, Michigan
| | - Makoto M. Jones
- Salt Lake City VA Healthcare System, Salt Lake City, Utah
- Department of Medicine, University of Utah, Salt Lake City
| | - Vincent X. Liu
- Division of Research, Kaiser Permanente Northern California, Oakland
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Anderson DJ, Moehring RW, Parish A, David MZ, Hsueh K, Cressman L, Tolomeo P, Habrock-Bach T, Hill CL, Ryan M, O'Brien C, Lokhnygina Y, Dodds Ashley E. The Impact of CMS SEP-1 Core Measure Implementation on Antibacterial Utilization: a retrospective multicenter longitudinal cohort study with interrupted time-series analysis. Clin Infect Dis 2021; 75:503-511. [PMID: 34739080 DOI: 10.1093/cid/ciab937] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/12/2021] [Indexed: 11/14/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The impact of the U.S. Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) Severe Sepsis and Septic Shock: Management Bundle (SEP-1) Core Measure on overall antibacterial utilization is unknown. METHODS We performed a retrospective multicenter longitudinal cohort study with interrupted time series analysis to determine the impact of SEP-1 implementation on antibacterial utilization and patient outcomes. All adult patients admitted to 26 hospitals between October 1, 2014, and September 30, 2015 (the "SEP-1 preparation period") and between November 1, 2015, and October 31, 2016 (the "SEP-1 implementation period") were evaluated for inclusion.The primary outcome was total antibacterial utilization measured as days of therapy (DOT) per 1,000 patient days. RESULTS The study cohort included 701,055 eligible patient admissions and 4.2 million patient days. Overall antibacterial utilization increased 2% each month during SEP-1 preparation (RR=1.02 per month [95% CI 1.00-1.04]; p=0.02). Cumulatively, the mean monthly DOT/1,000 patient-days increased 24.4% [95% CI 18.0, 38.8] over the entire study period (October 2014-October 2016). The rate of sepsis diagnosis/1,000 patients increased 2% each month during SEP-1 preparation (RR=1.02 per month [95% CI 1.00-1.04]; p=0.04). The rate of all-cause mortality/1,000 patients decreased during the study period (SEP-1 preparation RR=0.95 [0.92-0.98]; p=0.001 and SEP-1 implementation RR=0.98 [95% CI 0.97-1.00]; p=0.01). Cumulatively, the monthly mean all-cause mortality/1,000 patients declined 38.5% [95% CI 25.9, 48.0] over the study period. CONCLUSIONS Announcement and implementation of the CMS SEP-1 process measure was associated with increased diagnosis of sepsis and antibacterial utilization and decreased mortality among hospitalized patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Deverick J Anderson
- Duke Center for Antimicrobial Stewardship and Infection Prevention, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Rebekah W Moehring
- Duke Center for Antimicrobial Stewardship and Infection Prevention, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Alice Parish
- Department of Biostatistics, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Michael Z David
- Department of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Kevin Hsueh
- Division of Infectious Diseases, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA
| | - Leigh Cressman
- Center for Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Pam Tolomeo
- Center for Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Tracey Habrock-Bach
- Division of Infectious Diseases, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA
| | - Cherie L Hill
- Division of Infectious Diseases, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA
| | - Matthew Ryan
- Duke Center for Antimicrobial Stewardship and Infection Prevention, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Cara O'Brien
- Department of Medicine, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Yuliya Lokhnygina
- Department of Biostatistics, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|