β-Blockers, Tachycardia, and Survival Following Sepsis: An Observational Cohort Study

Impact of premorbid use of beta‑blockers on survival outcomes of patients with sepsis: A systematic review and meta‑analysis

It is unclear if premorbid use of beta-blockers affects sepsis outcomes. The present systematic review aimed to assess the impact of premorbid beta-blocker use on mortality and the need for mechanical ventilation in patients with sepsis. Embase, Scopus, PubMed and Web of Science were searched for studies comparing outcomes of patients with sepsis based on the premorbid use of beta-blockers. The primary outcome was mortality, and the secondary outcome was the need for mechanical ventilation. The results were reported as odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). A total of 17 studies including 64,586 patients with sepsis were included. Of them, 8,665 patients received premorbid beta-blockers and 55,921 patients were not treated with premorbid beta-blockers and served as a control group. Pooled analysis of mortality rates revealed that premorbid use of beta-blockers did not affect in-hospital mortality (OR: 0.96; 95% CI: 0.78, 1.18; and I2=63%) but significantly reduced one-month mortality rates (OR: 0.83; 95% CI: 0.72, 0.96; and I2=63%). Combined analysis of adjusted data showed that premorbid beta-blockers were associated with a significant survival advantage in patients with sepsis (OR: 0.81; 95% CI: 0.72, 0.92; and I2=70%). However, there was no effect of premorbid use of beta-blockers on the need for mechanical ventilation (OR: 0.93; 95% CI: 0.66, 1.30); and I2=72%). The results of the present study indicated that premorbid use of beta-blockers is associated with improved survival in patients with sepsis. However, it does not impact the need for mechanical ventilation. The results should be interpreted with caution as the data is observational and unadjusted.

Heart rate/temperature ratio: A practical prognostic indicator for critically ill patients with sepsis

Background

We hypothesize that the heart rate/temperature ratio can predict intensive care unit (ICU) mortality in critical ill patients with sepsis. We aimed to explore the association between the heart rate/temperature ratio and ICU mortality in patients with sepsis.

Methods

We conducted this study utilizing a comprehensive critical care medicine database. The primary endpoint assessed was ICU mortality. A multivariable logistic regression model was employed to determine the independent impact of the heart rate to temperature ratio on ICU mortality.

Results

The study included 12,321 patients. A nonlinear relationship was observed between the heart rate/temperature ratio and ICU mortality, with an inflection point identified at 2.22. The results from the Multivariable logistic regression analysis revealed that the heart rate/temperature ratio independently contributed to the risk of ICU mortality. In model II, there was a 55 % higher ICU mortality rate with a heart rate/temperature ratio greater than 2.22 than with that less than 2.22 (odds ratio [OR] = 1.55, 95 % confidence interval [CI] 1.35-1.77). Moreover, an elevated heart rate/temperature ratio as a continuous variable showed a positive association with ICU mortality (OR = 2.14; 95 % CI: 1.87-2.45). The impact of the heart rate/temperature ratio on ICU mortality remained consistent across all subgroup variables. The sensitivity analysis results consistently supported the primary outcome, with an E value of 2.47. This suggests that the influence of unmeasured confounders on the observed outcomes was minimal, thereby confirming the robustness of the findings.

Conclusions

The heart rate/temperature ratio is a readily available and convenient indicator in a clinical setting. Elevated heart rate/temperature ratios, particularly those exceeding 2.22, are strongly linked to a high ICU mortality rate among critically ill sepsis patients.

Association between the β-blocker use and patients with sepsis: a cohort study

Objective

This study aimed to assess whether β-blockers are associated with mortality in patients with sepsis.

Method

We conducted a retrospective cohort study of patients with sepsis using the Medical Information Market for Intensive Care (MIMIC)-IV and the emergency intensive care unit (eICU) databases. The primary outcome was the in-hospital mortality rate. The propensity score matching (PSM) method was adopted to reduce confounder bias. Subgroup and sensitivity analyses were performed to test the stability of the conclusions.

Results

We included a total of 61,751 patients with sepsis, with an overall in-hospital mortality rate of 15.3% in MIMIC-IV and 13.6% in eICU. The inverse probability-weighting model showed that in-hospital mortality was significantly lower in the β-blockers group than in the non-β-blockers group [HR = 0.71, 95% CI: 0.66-0.75, p < 0.001 in MIMIC-IV, and HR = 0.48, 95% CI: 0.45-0.52, p < 0.001 in eICU]. In subgroups grouped according to sex, age, heart rate, APSIII, septic shock, and admission years, the results did not change.

Conclusion

β-blocker use is associated with lower in-hospital mortality in patients with sepsis, further randomized trials are required to confirm this association.

Effect of β-blockers on mortality in patients with sepsis: A propensity-score matched analysis

Objectives

We aimed to evaluate the association between β-blocker therapy and mortality in patients with sepsis.

Methods

Patients with sepsis were selected from the Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care (MIMIC)-III. Propensity score matching (PSM) was used to balance the baseline differences. A multivariate Cox regression model was used to assess the relationship between β-blocker therapy and mortality. The primary outcome was the 28-day mortality.

Results

A total of 12,360 patients were included in the study, involving 3,895 who received β-blocker therapy and 8,465 who did not. After PSM, 3,891 pairs of patients were matched. The results showed that β-blockers were associated with improved 28- (hazards ratio (HR) 0.78) and 90-day (HR 0.84) mortality. Long-acting β-blockers were associated with improved 28-day survival (757/3627 [20.9%] vs. 583/3627 [16.1%], P &lt; 0.001, HR0.76) and 90-day survival (1065/3627 [29.4%] vs.921/3627 [25.4%], P &lt; 0.001, HR 0.77). Short-acting β-blocker treatment did not reduce the 28-day and 90-day mortality (61/264 [23.1%] vs. 63/264 [23.9%], P = 0.89 and 83/264 [31.4%] vs. 89/264 [31.7%], P = 0.8, respectively).

Conclusions

β-blockers were associated with improved 28- and 90-day mortality in patients with sepsis and septic shock. Long-acting β-blocker therapy may have a protective role in patients with sepsis, reducing the 28-day and 90-day mortality. However, short-acting β-blocker (esmolol) treatment did not reduce the mortality in sepsis.

Premorbid beta blockade in sepsis is associated with a lower risk of a lactate concentration above the lactate threshold, a retrospective cohort study

Sepsis and septic shock represent a significant worldwide mortality burden. A lactate greater than 4 mmol/L is associated with increased mortality in septic patients. This is the concentration at the "lactate threshold" where serum lactate concentrations rise markedly with increased workload in exercise. Hyperlactatemia in both sepsis and exercise is contributed to by adrenergic agonism which stimulates aerobic glycolysis, increasing lactate production and decreasing lactate clearance. Our hypothesis is that in patients with sepsis, treatment with beta blockers in the community will be associated with a lower probability of initial lactate ≥ 4 mmol/L. This was single centre retrospective cohort study. We used an in-house SQL Database for all admissions to ICU/HDU for the 2017-2020 calendar years. The dataset was filtered for an APACHE III Diagnosis of sepsis. T-tests were used for continuous data, Chi squared and Fisher's exact test were used as appropriate to compare proportions. Logistic regression was used to investigate covariate effects. Of the 160 patient records analysed, 49 were prescribed beta blockers. A greater proportion of patients not prescribed beta blockers in the community had a first lactate ≥ 4 mmol/L (p = 0.049). This was robust to regression analysis. There was no difference in the proportion of patients with lactate ≥ 2 mmol/L (p = 0.52). In our cohort patients previously prescribed beta blockers were less likely to have a lactate of ≥ 4 mmol/mL. This supports the proposed mechanism that treatment with beta blockers increases the lactate threshold in sepsis. Further study is warranted.

Beta-blocker treatment in the critically ill: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Critical illness may lead to activation of the sympathetic system. The sympathetic stimulation may be further increased by exogenous catecholamines, such as vasopressors and inotropes. Excessive adrenergic stress has been associated with organ dysfunction and higher mortality. β-Blockers may reduce the adrenergic burden, but they may also compromise perfusion to vital organs thus worsening organ dysfunction. To assess the effect of treatment with β-blockers in critically ill adults, we conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We conducted a search from three major databases: Ovid Medline, the Cochrane Central Register for Controlled Trials and Scopus database. Two independent reviewers screened, selected, and assessed the included articles according to prespecified eligibility criteria. We assessed risk of bias of eligible articles according to the Cochrane guidelines. Quality of evidence was assessed using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) approach.

RESULTS

Sixteen randomized controlled trials comprising 2410 critically ill patients were included in the final review. A meta-analysis of 11 trials including 2103 patients showed a significant reduction in mortality in patients treated with β-blockers compared to control (risk ratio 0.65, 95%CI 0.53-0.79; p < .0001). There was no significant difference in mean arterial pressure or vasopressor load. Quality of life, biventricular ejection fraction, blood lactate levels, cardiac biomarkers and mitochondrial function could not be included in meta-analysis due to heterogenous reporting of outcomes.

CONCLUSIONS

In this systematic review we found that β-blocker treatment reduced mortality in critical illness. Use of β-blockers in critical illness thus appears safe after initial hemodynamic stabilization. High-quality RCT's are needed to answer the questions concerning optimal target group of patients, timing of β-blocker treatment, choice of β-blocker, and choice of physiological and hemodynamic parameters to target during β-blocker treatment in critical illness.KEY MESSAGESA potential outcome benefit of β-blocker treatment in critical illness exists according to the current review and meta-analysis. Administration of β-blockers to resuscitated patients in the ICU seems safe in terms of hemodynamic stability and outcome, even during concomitant vasopressor administration. However, further studies, preferably large RCTs on β-blocker treatment in the critically ill are needed to answer the questions concerning timing and choice of β-blocker, patient selection, and optimal hemodynamic targets.

Beta Blockers can mask not only Hypoglycemia, but also Hypotension

Background:

Beta-adrenergic (β-AR) receptor blockers (BBs) are an essential class of drugs as they have numerous indications. On the other hand, they have numerous unwanted effects which decrease the compliance, adherence, and persistence of this very useful group of drugs.

Objective:

The paper aims to analyze the possibility that an unnoticed side effect may contribute to a less favorable pharmacologic profile of BBs, e.g., a diminished reaction to a sudden fall in BP.

Methods:

We searched two medical databases for abstracts and citations (Medline and SCOPUS). Moreover, we searched the internet for drug prescription leaflets (of the individual BBs).

Results:

Whichever cause of stress is considered, the somatic manifestations of stress will be (partially) masked if a patient takes BB. Stress–induced hypercatecholaminemia acts on β-AR of cardiomyocytes; it increases heart rate and contractility, effects suppressed by BBs. The answers of the organism to hypoglycemia and hypotension share the main mechanisms such as sympathetic nervous system activation and hypercatecholaminemia. Thus, there is a striking analogy: BBs can cover up symptoms of both hypoglycemia (which is widely known) and of hypotension (which is not recognized). It is widely known that BBs can cause hypotension. However, they can also complicate recovery by spoiling the defense mechanisms in hypotension as they interfere with the crucial compensatory reflex to increase blood pressure in hypotension.

Conclusion:

Beta blockers can cause hypotension, mask it, and make recovery more difficult. This is clinically important and deserves to be more investigated and probably to be stated as a warning.

Effect of Premorbid Beta-Blockers on Mortality in Patients With Sepsis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis to investigate the impact of premorbid beta-blockers on mortality in patients with sepsis.

DATA SOURCES

We searched EMBASE, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and MEDLINE for eligible studies. The protocol was registered at the PROSPERO (CRD42021256813).

STUDY SELECTION

Two authors independently evaluated the following inclusion criteria: (1) randomized controlled trials, cohort studies, cross-sectional studies; (2) patients with sepsis aged ≥18 years, and (3) premorbid beta-blocker use.

DATA EXTRACTION

Two authors extracted the patients' characteristics and outcomes independently. All analyses were performed using the random-effects models. The primary outcome was short-term mortality, defined as mortality within 30 days, in-hospital or intensive care unit mortality.

DATA SYNTHESIS

Ten studies (n = 24 748 patients) were included. The pooled odds ratio (OR) of short-term mortality associated with the premorbid use of beta-blockers was 0.85 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.69-1.04; P = .12; I² = 50%). Five studies reported an adjusted OR of short-term mortality. The pooled adjusted OR of short-term mortality associated with the premorbid use of beta-blockers was 0.73 (95% CI, 0.65-0.83; P < .001; I² = 0%).

CONCLUSION

Premorbid beta-blockers were associated with a lower short-term mortality in patients with sepsis.

Beta-Adrenergic Blockade in Critical Illness

Catecholamine upregulation is a core pathophysiological feature in critical illness. Sustained catecholamine β-adrenergic induction produces adverse effects relevant to critical illness management. β-blockers (βB) have proposed roles in various critically ill disease states, including sepsis, trauma, burns, and cardiac arrest. Mounting evidence suggests βB improve hemodynamic and metabolic parameters culminating in decreased burn healing time, reduced mortality in traumatic brain injury, and improved neurologic outcomes following cardiac arrest. In sepsis, βB appear hemodynamically benign after acute resuscitation and may augment cardiac function. The emergence of ultra-rapid βB provides new territory for βB, and early data suggest significant improvements in mitigating atrial fibrillation in persistently tachycardic septic patients. This review summarizes the evidence regarding the pharmacotherapeutic role of βB on relevant pathophysiology and clinical outcomes in various types of critical illness.