Vaccine Coverage Associated With Ending a Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) Wave: A Retrospective Longitudinal Analysis

The effect of COVID-19 vaccination on 30-day mortality after cardiac surgery - Insights from the Israel national registries

Background

We compared the effect of perioperative COVID-19, before and after vaccination, on 30-day mortality after cardiac surgery.

Methods

Data was extracted from several national registries. The study period was March 1st, 2020-March 31st, 2022.

Results

2594 adult patients underwent cardiac surgery before the availability of a universal COVID-19 vaccine. 33 patients were diagnosed with COVID-19 prior to surgery (mean age 58.3±10.0, mean length of time 73.6±60.1 days) and 7 patients were diagnosed with COVID-19 0-14 days after surgery (age 66.4±7.6). These were compared to 4426 patients who underwent cardiac surgery after the availability of a universal vaccine: 469 patients were diagnosed with COVID-19 prior to surgery (age 62.1±10.1, length of time 175.8±158.2) and 32 patients diagnosed with COVID-19 0-14 days after surgery (age 60.8±14.5). In patients diagnosed with COVID-19 prior to surgery, there was no excess 30-day mortality either before or after vaccination (1 (3.0%) vs. 57 (2.2%), respectively, P<0.8, and 8 (1.7%) vs. 87 (2.2%), respectively, P<0.5). Patients diagnosed with COVID-19 after surgery, but before vaccination, had significantly higher 30-day mortality compared to COVID-19 negative patients (2 (28.6%) vs. 56 (2.2%) respectively, P<0.0001). This excess mortality disappeared after universal vaccination (1 (3.1%) vs. 94 (2.1%) respectively, P<0.7).

Conclusions

COVID-19, when diagnosed in the early post-operative period, was a risk factor for mortality before available vaccinations, but not after vaccination was widely available. Pre-surgery screening and post-surgical isolation is essential until vaccines are available. This data may be useful for patient management in future respiratory pandemics.

Review of Israel's action and response during the COVID-19 pandemic and tabletop exercise for the evaluation of readiness and resilience-lessons learned 2020-2021

Background

Reevaluating response plans is essential to ensuring consistent readiness and resilience to the COVID-19 pandemic. The "During Action Review" and Tabletop (DART) methodology provides a retrospective and prospective assessment to inform the adaptive response. Israel introduced COVID-19 vaccinations in December 2020 and was the first country to implement booster vaccination to address waning immunity and surges caused by new variants. We assessed Israel's readiness and resilience related to COVID-19 response while capturing the pre-vaccination and vaccination periods.

Methods

A DART analysis was conducted between December 2020 and August 2021 among experts involved in the management of the COVID-19 pandemic in Israel. During the retrospective stage, a role-based questionnaire and discussions were undertaken in a participant-led review of the response, focusing on epidemiology and surveillance, risk communication, and vaccines. The prospective stage included tabletop exercises to evaluate short to long-term simulated scenarios.

Results

Participants emphasized the pivotal role of Israel globally by sharing experiences with the pandemic, and vaccination. Perceived strengths included multi-sectoral collaboration between the Ministry of Health, healthcare providers, academia, military, and others, stretching capacities, expanding laboratory workload, and establishing/maintaining surveillance. The vaccine prioritization plan and strong infrastructure, including computerized databases, enabled real-life assessment of vaccine uptake and impact. Challenges included the need to change case definitions early on and insufficient staffing. Quarantine of patients and contacts was particularly challenging among underprivileged communities. Risk communication approaches need to focus more on creating norms in behavior. Trust issues and limited cooperation were noted, especially among ethnic and religious minorities. To ensure readiness and resiliency, participants recommended establishing a nationally deployed system for bringing in and acting upon feedback from the field, especially concerning risk communication and vaccines.

Conclusion

Our study appraised strengths and weaknesses of the COVID-19 pandemic response in Israel and led to concrete recommendations for adjusting responses and future similar events. An efficient response comprised multi-sectoral collaboration, policy design, infrastructure, care delivery, and mitigation measures, including vaccines, while risk communication, trust issues, and limited cooperation with minority groups were perceived as areas for action and intervention.