Does Adjunctive Clindamycin Have a Role in Staphylococcus aureus Bacteremia? A Protocol for the Adjunctive Treatment Domain of the Staphylococcus aureus Network Adaptive Platform (SNAP) Randomized Controlled Trial

BACKGROUND

The use of adjunctive antibiotics directed against exotoxin production in Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia (SAB) is widespread, and it is recommended in many guidelines, but this is based on limited evidence. Existing guidelines are based on the theoretical premise of toxin suppression, as many strains of S. aureus produce toxins such as leukocidins (eg, Panton-Valentine leukocidin, toxic shock syndrome toxin 1, exfoliative toxins, and various enterotoxins). Many clinicians therefore believe that limiting exotoxin production release by S. aureus could reduce its virulence and improve clinical outcomes. Clindamycin, a protein synthesis inhibitor antibiotic, is commonly used for this purpose. We report the domain-specific protocol, embedded in a large adaptive, platform trial, seeking to definitively answer this question.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

The Staphylococcus aureus Network Adaptive Platform (SNAP) trial is a pragmatic, randomized, multicenter adaptive platform trial that aims to compare different SAB therapies, simultaneously, for 90-day mortality rates. The adjunctive treatment domain aims to test the effectiveness of adjunctive antibiotics, initially comparing clindamycin to no adjunctive antibiotic, but future adaptations may include other agents. Individuals will be randomized to receive either 5 days of adjunctive clindamycin (or lincomycin) or no adjunctive antibiotic therapy alongside standard-of-care antibiotics. Most participants with SAB (within 72 hours of index blood culture and with no contraindications) will be eligible to participate in this domain. Prespecified analyses are defined in the statistical appendix to the core protocol, and domain-specific secondary analyses will be adjusted for resistance to clindamycin, disease phenotype (complicated or uncomplicated SAB) and Panton-Valentine leukocidin-positive isolate.

Fever of Unknown Origin: A Case Report of Hepatic Phlegmon in an Immunocompetent Patient

Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) hepatic phlegmon is a rare cause of fever of unknown origin (FUO) in an immunocompetent patient from a high-income country (HIC). MRSA hepatic phlegmon is typically linked to protein malnutrition and chronic gastrointestinal infections in low- to middle-income countries while immunodeficiencies such as chronic granulomatous disease (CGD) are a more common cause in a HIC. Clinical manifestations of hepatic phlegmon can be vague and nonspecific making a complete FUO workup critical during evaluation. We report a case of MRSA hepatic phlegmon in an immunocompetent patient with a nonspecific history and physical exam findings. A 14-year-old male presented with an 11-day history of fever with mild bilateral upper quadrant abdominal pain. The patient also has mild upper quadrant pain with palpation. The patient was diagnosed with a hepatic phlegmon on abdominal ultrasound and computed tomography (CT) of the abdomen. He was started on antibiotics and Interventional Radiology placed drains into the phlegmon and performed vancomycin drain washes. Inflammatory markers were initially elevated and trended down with interventions. The patient did well with treatment and was back to baseline during outpatient follow-up with the Infectious Disease team. This case illustrates the importance of a complete workup in patients with FUO.

Current and emerging drug treatment strategies to tackle invasive community-associated methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) infection: what are the challenges?

INTRODUCTION

Community-acquired methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (CA-MRSA) infections represent a leading cause of purulent skin and soft tissue infections in some geographical regions. Traditionally, 'old antibiotics' such as trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole, tetracyclines, clindamycin, chloramphenicol,vancomycin, and teicoplanin have been used to treat these infections, but these were often associated with low efficacy and excessive side effects and toxicity, especially nephrotoxicity. Along with the development of new compounds, the last decade has seen substantial improvements in the management of CA-MRSA infections.

AREAS COVERED

In this review, the authors discuss the current and emerging drug treatment strategies to tackle invasive CA-MRSA infections. Articles reported in this review were selected from through literature searches using the PubMed database.

EXPERT OPINION

The availability of new drugs showing a potent in vitro activity against CA-MRSA represents a unique opportunity to face the threat of resistance while potentially reducing toxicity. All these compounds represent promising options to enhance our antibiotic armamentarium. However, data regarding the use of these new drugs in real-life studies are limited and their best placement in therapy and in terms of optimization of medical resources and balance of cost-effectiveness requires further investigation.

OUP accepted manuscript

Background

Combination antibiotic therapy with an antitoxin agent, such as clindamycin, is included in some guidelines for severe, toxin-mediated Staphylococcus aureus infections. The evidence to support this practice is currently limited to in vitro, animal and observational human case-series data, with no previous randomized controlled trials (RCTs).

Objectives

This pilot RCT aimed to determine the feasibility of conducting a clinical trial to examine if adjunctive clindamycin with standard therapy has greater efficacy than standard therapy alone for S. aureus infections.

Methods

We performed an investigator-initiated, open-label, multicentre, pilot RCT (ACTRN12617001416381p) in adults and children with severe S. aureus infections, randomized to standard antibiotic therapy with or without clindamycin for 7 days.

Results

Over 28 months, across nine sites, 127 individuals were screened and 34 randomized, including 11 children (32%). The primary outcome—number of days alive and free of systemic inflammatory response syndrome ≤14 days—was similar between groups: clindamycin (3 days [IQR 1–6]) versus standard therapy (4 days [IQR 0–8]). The 90 day mortality was 0% (0/17) in the clindamycin group versus 24% (4/17) in the standard therapy group. Secondary outcomes—microbiological relapse, treatment failure or diarrhoea—were similar between groups.

Conclusions

As the first clinical trial assessing adjunctive clindamycin for S. aureus infections, this study indicates feasibility and that adults and children can be incorporated into one trial using harmonized endpoints, and there were no safety concerns. The CASSETTE trial will inform the definitive S. aureus Network Adaptive Platform (SNAP) trial, which includes an adjunctive clindamycin domain and participants with non-severe disease.

The eternal dilemma of antitoxin antibiotics for skin and soft tissue infection

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

In standard clinical practice, combined antibiotic treatment is used to treat severe skin and soft tissue infections (SSTIs), whereby one of the drugs is usually a protein synthesis inhibitor antibiotic. However, evidence for this practice is only based on data from 'in vitro' studies, animal models and case reports. There are no randomized controlled trials. In the light of several new drugs marketed for the treatment of these infections, there is a need to revise the state of the art.

RECENT FINDINGS

New reviews and systematic appraisals of the literature exist on the use of protein synthesis inhibitor antibiotics to treat severe SSTI. Several 'in vitro' studies have assessed the efficacy of some of the new drugs.

SUMMARY

Combination therapy, including an adjuvant protein synthesis inhibitor antibiotic for toxin suppression, should be used both in patients with severe SSTI and in those with moderate infection and risk factors for methicillin-resistant positive- or Panton-Valentine leukocidin positive-Staphylococcus aureus infection.

Demographic characteristics, clinical features, and optimal management of hospitalized patients with staphylococcal scalded skin syndrome

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES

Optimal management of staphylococcal scalded skin syndrome (SSSS) has not been established. Clindamycin may benefit patients via inhibition of ribosomal toxin production, but resistance patterns suggest penicillinase-resistant penicillins or cephalosporins should be the first line. Our goal was to describe demographic and clinical characteristics of SSSS patients at our institution, delineate bacterial resistance patterns, and examine outcomes of varying therapeutic strategies in SSSS.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective review of patients under the age of 18 with confirmed clinical SSSS diagnosis by the dermatology consult team at the University of North Carolina (UNC) Hospitals from January 2008 to April 2017. Median hospital and ICU length of stay (LOS) were compared using a Wilcoxon Rank Sum Test.

RESULTS

We found 59 SSSS patients. Coverage with clindamycin and vancomycin versus absence of that combination was associated with shorter ICU LOS. Although trending toward reduced hospital LOS, this was not significantly altered with the use of vancomycin and clindamycin after adjustment for multiple comparisons. Individual use of either clindamycin or vancomycin did not significantly alter overall hospital or ICU LOS. Among 24 patients with a pathogen identified on culture, 18 (75.0%) revealed resistance to clindamycin, and 2 (8.3%) revealed MRSA.

CONCLUSIONS

Clindamycin resistance is more prevalent in hospitalized SSSS patients compared to our pediatric outpatient population. The combination of vancomycin and clindamycin results in shorter ICU LOS. Individual use of clindamycin or vancomycin does not significantly reduce hospital or ICU LOS after adjustment for multiple comparisons.

Revisiting the inoculum effect for Streptococcus pyogenes with a hollow fibre infection model

Severe, invasive Streptococcus pyogenes (Strep A) infections result in greater than 500,000 deaths annually. First line treatment for such infections is benzylpenicillin, often with the addition of clindamycin, but treatment failure can occur with this regimen. This failure has been partially attributed to the inoculum effect, which presents as reduced antibiotic susceptibility during high bacterial density and plateau-phase growth. Hollow fibre infection models (HFIM) have been proposed as an in vitro alternative to in vivo research to study these effects. To re-evaluate the inoculum effect for benzylpenicillin, clindamycin, linezolid, and trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole using a Strep A HFIM. Differential antibiotic susceptibility of Strep A was measured in a HFIM starting from low- and high-density inocula with an average difference in bacterial concentration of 56-fold. Dynamic antibiotic concentrations were delivered over 48 h to simulate in vivo human pharmacokinetics in an in vitro model. Differences in antibiotic susceptibility were measured by plate count of colony-forming units over time. Inoculum effects were seen in benzylpenicillin and linezolid at 24 h, and benzylpenicillin, linezolid, and clindamycin at 48 h. The effect size was greatest for continuously infused benzylpenicillin at 48 h with a log₁₀-fold difference of 4.02 between groups. No inoculum effect was seen in trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole, with a maximal log₁₀-fold difference of 0.40. Inoculum effects were seen using benzylpenicillin, linezolid, and clindamycin, which may predict reduced clinical efficacy following treatment delay. The model has proven robust and largely in agreeance with published data, recommending it for further Strep A study.

Staphylococcal Skin and Soft Tissue Infections

Staphylococcus aureus is the most common bacteria causing purulent skin and soft tissue infections. Many disease-causing S aureus strains are methicillin resistant; thus, empiric therapy should be given to cover methicillin-resistant S aureus. Bacterial wound cultures are important for characterizing local susceptibility patterns. Definitive antibiotic therapy is warranted, although there are no compelling data demonstrating superiority of any one antibiotic over another. Antibiotic choice is predicated by the infection severity, local susceptibility patterns, and drug-related safety, tolerability, and cost. Response to therapy is expected within the first days; 5 to 7 days of therapy is typically adequate to achieve cure.

Adjunctive protein synthesis inhibitor antibiotics for toxin suppression in Staphylococcus aureus infections: a systematic appraisal

Protein synthesis inhibitor antibiotics inhibit synthesis of new proteins, including exotoxins and other important virulence determinants in Staphylococcus aureus. A summary of the literature regarding the use of adjunctive protein synthesis inhibitors for toxin suppression in the setting of S. aureus infections is presented.

Antibiotics degradation in soil: A case of clindamycin, trimethoprim, sulfamethoxazole and their transformation products

Twelve different soil types that represent the soil compartments of the Czech Republic were fortified with three antibiotics (clindamycin (CLI), sulfamethoxazole (SUL), and trimethoprim (TRI)) to investigate their fate. Five metabolites (clindamycin sulfoxide (CSO), hydroxy clindamycin sulfoxide (HCSO), S-(SDC) and N-demethyl clindamycin (NDC), N₄-acetyl sulfamethoxazole (N₄AS), and hydroxy trimethoprim (HTR)) were detected and identified using HPLC/HRMS and HRPS in the soil matrix in this study. The identities of CSO and N₄AS were confirmed using commercially available reference standards. The parent compounds degraded in all soils. Almost all of the metabolites have been shown to be persistent in soils, with the exception of N₄AS, which was formed and degraded completely within 23 days of exposure. The rate of degradation mainly depended on the soil properties. The PCA results showed a high dependence between the soil type and behaviour of the pharmaceutical metabolites. The mentioned metabolites can be formed in soils, and the most persistent ones may be transported to the ground water and environmental water bodies. Because no information on the effects of those metabolites on living organism are available, more studies should be performed in the future to predict the risk to the environment.

Hot topics in the diagnosis and management of skin and soft-tissue infections

Eighteen hot topics regarding the diagnosis and management of skin and soft-tissue infections (SSTIs) were selected and reviewed by members of the SSTI Working Group of the International Society of Chemotherapy (ISC). Despite the large amount of literature available on the issue selected, there are still many unknowns with regard to many of them and further studies are required to answer these challenging issues that face clinicians on a daily basis.

Failure of outpatient antibiotics among patients hospitalized for acute bacterial skin infections: What is the clinical relevance?

BACKGROUND

Infectious Diseases Society of America guidelines recommend that patients hospitalized for acute bacterial skin infections after failure of outpatient antibiotic therapy be managed as "severe" infections; however, the clinical relevance of apparent failure of outpatient therapy is not clear.

METHODS

This was a secondary analysis of a multicenter, retrospective cohort of adults and children hospitalized for cellulitis, abscess, or wound infection. We compared clinical features, laboratory and microbiology findings, antibiotic treatment, and outcomes among patients who received outpatient antibiotics prior to admission and those who did not.

RESULTS

Of 533 patients, 179 (34%) received outpatient antibiotics prior to admission. Compared with those who did not, patients who received antibiotics prior to admission less frequently had fever (18% vs 26%, P=.04) and leukocytosis (33% vs 51%, P<.001). In the 202 cases where a microorganism was identified, Staphylococcus aureus was more common among those who received antibiotics prior to admission (75% vs 58%, P=.02), particularly methicillin-resistant S aureus (41% vs 27%, P=.049), whereas aerobic gram-negative bacilli were less common (3% vs 13%, P=.03). After hospitalization, clinical failure occurred with similar frequency between the 2 groups (12% vs 11%, P=.73).

CONCLUSIONS

Patients hospitalized with skin infections after apparently failing outpatient therapy had clinical features suggestive of less severe infection and similar outcomes compared with patients who did not receive antibiotics prior to admission. Our results suggest that inpatient treatment for patients not responding to outpatient therapy should focus on methicillin-resistant S aureus, not gram-negative pathogens.