Invasive candidiasis in critical care: challenges and future directions

Invasive candidiasis is the most common critical care-associated fungal infection with a crude mortality of ~ 40-55%. Important factors contributing to risk of invasive candidiasis in ICU include use of broad-spectrum antimicrobials, immunosuppressive drugs, and total parenteral nutrition alongside iatrogenic interventions which breach natural barriers to infection [vascular catheters, renal replacement therapy, extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO), surgery]. This review discusses three key challenges in this field. The first is the shift in Candida epidemiology across the globe to more resistant non-albicans species, in particular, the emergence of multi-resistant Candida glabrata and Candida auris, which pose significant treatment and infection control challenges in critical care. The second challenge lies in the timely and appropriate initiation and discontinuation of antifungal therapy. Early antifungal strategies (prophylaxis, empirical and pre-emptive) using tools such as the Candida colonisation index, clinical prediction rules and fungal non-culture-based tests have been developed: we review the evidence on implementation of these tools in critical care to aid clinical decision-making around the prescribing and cessation of antifungal therapy. The third challenge is selection of the most appropriate antifungal to use in critical care patients. While guidelines exist to aid choice, this heterogenous and complex patient group require a more tailored approach, particularly in cases of acute kidney injury, liver impairment and for patients supported by extracorporeal membrane oxygenation. We highlight key research priorities to overcome these challenges in the future.

The Presence of (1→3)-β-D-Glucan as Prognostic Marker in Patients After Major Abdominal Surgery

BACKGROUND

While the serological detection of (1→3)-β-D-glucan (BDG) can indicate invasive fungal disease (IFD), false positivity occurs. Nevertheless, the presence of BDG can still be recognized by the host's innate immune system and persistent BDG antigenemia, in the absence of IFD, can result in deleterious proinflammatory immune responses.

METHODS

During the XXX (INTENSE) study into the preemptive use of micafungin to prevent invasive candidiasis (IC) after abdominal surgery, the serum burden of BDG was determined to aid diagnosis of IC. Data from the INTENSE study were analyzed to determine whether BDG was associated with organ failure and patient mortality, while accounting for the influences of IC and antifungal therapy.

RESULTS

A BDG concentration >100 pg/mL was associated with a significantly increased Sequential Organ Failure Assessment score (≤100 pg/mL: 2 vs >100 pg/mL: 5; P < .0001) and increased rates of mortality (≤100 pg/mL: 13.7% vs >100 pg/mL: 39.0%; P = .0002). Multiple (≥2) positive results >100 pg/mL or a BDG concentration increasing >100 pg/mL increased mortality (48.1%). The mortality rate in patients with IC and a BDG concentration >100 pg/mL and ≤100 pg/mL was 42.3% and 25.0%, respectively. The mortality rate in patients without IC but a BDG concentration >100 pg/mL was 37.3%. The use of micafungin did not affect the findings.

CONCLUSIONS

The presence of persistent or increasing BDG in the patient's circulation is associated with significant morbidity and mortality after abdominal surgery, irrespective of IC. The potential lack of a specific therapeutic focus has consequences when trying to manage these patients, and when designing clinical trials involving patients where host-associated BDG concentrations may be elevated.

CLINICAL TRIALS REGISTRATION

NCT01122368.