Clinical Outcomes Among Patients With Drug-resistant Tuberculosis Receiving Bedaquiline- or Delamanid-Containing Regimens

Bedaquiline versus injectable containing regimens for rifampicin-resistant and multidrug-resistant tuberculosis in a reference center in Brazil - a real-world evidence study using a retrospective design

BACKGROUND

Drug resistance (DR) is one of the several challenges to global tuberculosis (TB) control. The implementation of bedaquiline (BED) for DR-TB after more than 40 years was expected to improve treatment outcomes as well as microbiologic conversion and adverse events (AE) occurrence.

METHODS

Retrospective cohort study based on secondary data of patients with rifampicin-resistant (RR) or multidrug-resistant (MDR) TB reported to the Outpatient Clinic of Mycobacterial Diseases of the Thorax Diseases Institute - Federal University of Rio de Janeiro - Brazil, between 2016 and 2023. We aimed to evaluate microbiologic conversion, AE and TB treatment outcomes and compare them according to the treatment regimen used for RR/MDR-TB patients under routine conditions [Injectable Containing Regimens (ICR) versus BED Containing Regimens (BCR)]. Logistic regression and survival analysis using Cox regression and Kaplan Meier curve were used for statistical analysis.

RESULTS

Of the 463 DR-TB patients notified during the study period, 297 (64.1%) were included for analysis (ICR = 197 and BCR = 100). Overall AEs were more frequent (83.7 vs. 16.3%, p < 0.001) and occurred earlier in the ICR group (15 days vs. 65 days, p = 0.003). There were no cases of cardiotoxicity requiring interruption of BED treatment. None of the regimens of treatment tested were associated with smear or culture conversion on Cox regression analysis (p = 0.60 and 0.88, respectively). BED-containing regimens were also associated with favorable outcomes in multivariable logistic regression [adjusted odds ratio (aOR) = 2.63, 95% confidence interval (CI)1.36-5.07, p = 0.004], as higher years of schooling, primary drug resistance, and no previous TB treatment. In the survival analysis, BCR was inversely associated with the occurrence of AE during treatment follow-up (aHR 0.24, 95% CI 0.14-0.41, p < 0.001). In addition, TB treatment regimens with BED were also associated with favorable outcomes (aHR 2.41, 95% CI 1.62-3.57, p < 0.001), along with no illicit drug use and primary drug resistance.

CONCLUSIONS

The implementation of a fully oral treatment for RR/MDR-TB in a reference center in Brazil was safe and associated with favorable outcomes under routine conditions, despite social, demographic, and behavioral factors that may influence TB treatment completion.

Impact of bedaquiline regimen on the treatment success rates of multidrug-resistant tuberculosis patients in Egypt

Bedaquiline (BDQ), an innovative anti-tuberculous (TB) agent, has attracted attention for its potential effectiveness against drug-resistant TB. This study investigated the impact of BDQ-containing regimens on treatment success rates among multi-drug resistant tuberculosis (MDR-TB) patients in Egypt. We conducted a prospective cohort study that included all adult non-pregnant patients treated in MDR-TB centers in Egypt from April 1, 2020, to June 30, 2021, with follow-up extended until December 31, 2022. The study compared patients prescribed BDQ according to national protocols with those receiving conventional treatments for MDR-TB. Treatment success rates, mortality rates, and adverse events were analyzed using descriptive statistics, chi-square tests, logistic regression, and Kaplan-Meier survival curves. Adjustment for potential confounders was conducted using propensity score matching and Cox-hazard regressions. A total of 84 patients were included in this study. The median age of the study participants was 39 years; 22.6% were women, 57.1% were unemployed or housewives, and 1.2% had human immunodeficiency virus (HIV). Regarding the treatment regimen, 67.8% were exposed to BDQ-based treatment. Among the 55 patients (65.5%) with treatment success, a significantly higher success rate was observed in the BDQ group (73.7%) compared to the conventional group (48.1%), P = 0.042. Additionally, the incidence of skin discoloration was significantly higher in the BDQ group compared to the conventional group (38.6% versus 0.0%, P < 0.001). Despite the lower mortality incidence in the BDQ-group (14.0% versus 22.2% in the conventional group), the Kaplan-Meier survival analysis revealed no excess mortality associated with the BDQ-group, with a hazard ratio (HR) of 0.62 (95% CI 0.21-1.78, P = 0.372). Propensity score matching, while considering factors such as lesion site, diabetes mellitus, hepatitis C virus, and smoking, revealed a significant increase in the success rate associated with BDQ inclusion, with an HR of 6.79 (95% CI 1.8-25.8). In conclusion, BDQ is an effective and tolerable medication for treating MDR-TB, associated with lower mortality rates compared to conventional treatment.

Efficacy and safety of bedaquiline containing regimens in patients of drug-resistant tuberculosis: An updated systematic review and meta-analysis

Background

Tuberculosis is an infectious disease caused by Mycobacterium tuberculosis and leads to serious complications if left untreated. Some strains of Mycobacterium tuberculosis are multi-drug resistant and require treatment with newer drugs. Bedaquiline based treatment regimens have been used in patients who are diagnosed with drug resistant tuberculosis. The aim of this study is to assess the efficacy and safety profile of bedaquiline-based treatment regimens using a systematic review of existing literature and meta-analysis.

Methods

In this study, an electronic search was carried out on PubMed, ScienceDirect, and Cochrane library to find relevant literature from March 2021 onwards. Random-effects model was used to assess pooled treatment success rate and 95 % CIs. p-value of <0.05 was suggestive of publication bias. The review is registered with PROSPERO: CRD42023432748.

Results

A total of 543 articles were retrieved by database searching, out of which 12 new studies met the inclusion criteria. The total number of articles included in the review was 41 including 36 observational studies (having a total of 9,934 patients) and 5 experimental studies (having a total of 468 patients). The pooled treatment success rate was 76.9 % (95 % CI, 72.9-80.4) in the observational studies and 81.7 % (95 % CI, 67.2-90.7) in the experimental studies. Further subgroup analysis was done on the basis of treatment regimens containing bedaquiline only and treatment regimens containing bedaquiline and delamanid. The pooled treatment success rate in the studies consisting of patients who were treated with regimens containing bedaquiline only was 78.4 % (95 % CI, 74.2-82.1) and 73.6 % (95 % CI, 64.6-81.0) in studies consisting of patients who were treated with regimens containing bedaquiline and delamanid. There was no evidence of publication bias.

Conclusions

In patients of drug resistant tuberculosis having highly resistant strains of Mycobacterium tuberculosis undergoing treatment with bedaquiline-based regimen demonstrate high rates of culture conversion and treatment success. Moreover, the safety profile of bedaquiline-based regimens is well-established in all studies.

New and Repurposed Drugs for the Treatment of Active Tuberculosis: An Update for Clinicians

Although tuberculosis (TB) is preventable and curable, the lengthy treatment (generally 6 months), poor patient adherence, high inter-individual variability in pharmacokinetics (PK), emergence of drug resistance, presence of comorbidities, and adverse drug reactions complicate TB therapy and drive the need for new drugs and/or regimens. Hence, new compounds are being developed, available drugs are repurposed, and the dosing of existing drugs is optimized, resulting in the largest drug development portfolio in TB history. This review highlights a selection of clinically available drug candidates that could be part of future TB regimens, including bedaquiline, delamanid, pretomanid, linezolid, clofazimine, optimized (high dose) rifampicin, rifapentine, and para-aminosalicylic acid. The review covers drug development history, preclinical data, PK, and current clinical development.

The Changing Paradigm of Drug-Resistant Tuberculosis Treatment: Successes, Pitfalls, and Future Perspectives

Drug-resistant tuberculosis (DR-TB) remains a global crisis due to the increasing incidence of drug-resistant forms of the disease, gaps in detection and prevention, models of care, and limited treatment options. The DR-TB treatment landscape has evolved over the last 10 years. Recent developments include the remarkable activity demonstrated by the newly approved anti-TB drugs bedaquiline and pretomanid against Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Hence, treatment of DR-TB has drastically evolved with the introduction of the short-course regimen for multidrug-resistant TB (MDR-TB), transitioning to injection-free regimens and the approval of the 6-month short regimens for rifampin-resistant TB and MDR-TB. Moreover, numerous clinical trials are under way with the aim to reduce pill burden and shorten the DR-TB treatment duration. While there have been apparent successes in the field, some challenges remain. These include the ongoing inclusion of high-dose isoniazid in DR-TB regimens despite a lack of evidence for its efficacy and the inclusion of ethambutol and pyrazinamide in the standard short regimen despite known high levels of background resistance to both drugs. Furthermore, antimicrobial heteroresistance, extensive cavitary disease and intracavitary gradients, the emergence of bedaquiline resistance, and the lack of biomarkers to monitor DR-TB treatment response remain serious challenges to the sustained successes. In this review, we outline the impact of the new drugs and regimens on patient treatment outcomes, explore evidence underpinning current practices on regimen selection and duration, reflect on the disappointments and pitfalls in the field, and highlight key areas that require continued efforts toward improving treatment approaches and rapid biomarkers for monitoring treatment response.

Linezolid Exposure Is Associated with Cytopenias in Patients Treated for Multidrug-Resistant Tuberculosis

Although linezolid is effective for multidrug-resistant TB (MDR-TB) tuberculosis treatment, it is associated with cytopenias after 4 weeks of administration. Data on toxicities with long-term use of linezolid and drug pharmacodynamics in MDR-TB treatment are limited, and concerns about toxicity present barriers to wider implementation. This was a secondary analysis of a prospective cohort study of patients treated for MDR-TB in the country of Georgia from 2015 to 2017. Intensive blood sampling 4 to 6 weeks after treatment initiation with linezolid 600 mg daily was performed for pharmacokinetic (PK) analysis, including linezolid trough concentration (Cmin) and area under the curve from 0 to 24 hours (AUC0-24). Linezolid exposure was defined using literature-reported thresholds. Cytopenias were defined using an NIH adverse event (AE) scale. Logistic regression was used to evaluate the relationship between linezolid exposure and cytopenias. Among 76 patients receiving linezolid in their baseline treatment regimen and who had PK data available, cytopenia AEs occurred in 30 (39.5%) for an incidence rate of 46 per 100 person-years. The median duration of linezolid therapy was 526 days. No patients required dose reduction or interruption due to cytopenias. Median linezolid Cmin was 0.235 mg/L (interquartile range [IQR], 0.069 to 0.529), and median AUC0-24 was 89.6 mg·h/L (IQR, 69.2 to 116.2). Cytopenias were associated with linezolid PK parameters (Cmin > 2 mg/L and AUC0-24 > 160 mg·h/L). Cytopenias occurred frequently with long-term use of linezolid 600 mg/day and were associated with PK parameters but did not result in the need for treatment interruption in the management of a cohort of patients with MDR-TB.

Cycloserine and Linezolid for Tuberculosis Meningitis: Pharmacokinetic Evidence of Potential Usefulness

BACKGROUND

The ability of antituberculosis drugs to cross the blood-brain barrier and reach the central nervous system is critical to their effectiveness in treating tuberculosis meningitis (TBM). We sought to fill a critical knowledge gap by providing data on the ability of new and repurposed antituberculosis drugs to penetrate into the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF).

METHODS

We conducted a clinical pharmacology study among patients treated for TBM in Tbilisi, Georgia, from January 2019 until January 2020. Serial serum and CSF samples were collected while patients were hospitalized. CSF was collected from routine lumbar punctures with the timing of the lumbar puncture alternating between 2 and 6 hours to capture early and late CSF penetration.

RESULTS

A total of 17 patients treated for TBM (8 with confirmed disease) were included; all received linezolid, with a subset receiving cycloserine (5), clofazimine (5), delamanid (4), and bedaquiline (2). All CSF measurements of bedaquiline (12), clofazimine (24), and delamanid (19) were below the limit of detection. The median CSF concentrations of cycloserine at 2 and 6 hours were 15.90 and 15.10 µg/mL with adjusted CSF/serum ratios of 0.52 and 0.66. CSF concentrations of linezolid were 0.90 and 3.14 µg/mL at 2 and 6 hours, with adjusted CSF/serum ratios of 0.25 and 0.59, respectively. CSF serum linezolid concentrations were not affected by rifampin coadministration.

CONCLUSIONS

Based on moderate to high CSF penetration, linezolid and cycloserine may be effective drugs for TBM treatment, whereas the utility of bedaquiline, delamanid, and clofazimine is uncertain given their low CSF penetration.

Bedaquiline-containing regimens and multidrug-resistant tuberculosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Objective:

Multidrug-resistant tuberculosis (MDR-TB) is a life-threatening infectious disease. Treatment requires multiple antimicrobial agents used for extended periods of time. The present study sought to evaluate the treatment success rate of bedaquiline-based regimens in MDR-TB patients.

Methods:

This was a systematic review and meta-analysis of studies published up to March 15, 2021. The pooled treatment success rates and 95% CIs were assessed with the fixed-effect model or the random-effects model. Values of p < 0.05 were considered significant for publication bias.

Results:

A total of 2,679 articles were retrieved by database searching. Of those, 29 met the inclusion criteria. Of those, 25 were observational studies (including a total of 3,536 patients) and 4 were experimental studies (including a total of 440 patients). The pooled treatment success rate was 74.7% (95% CI, 69.8-79.0) in the observational studies and 86.1% (95% CI, 76.8-92.1; p = 0.00; I² = 75%) in the experimental studies. There was no evidence of publication bias (p > 0.05).

Conclusions:

In patients with MDR-TB receiving bedaquiline, culture conversion and treatment success rates are high even in cases of extensive resistance.

MDR Tuberculosis Treatment

Multidrug-resistant (MDR) tuberculosis (TB), resistant to isoniazid and rifampicin, continues to be one of the most important threats to controlling the TB epidemic. Over the last few years, there have been promising pharmacological advances in the paradigm of MDR TB treatment: new and repurposed drugs have shown excellent bactericidal and sterilizing activity against Mycobacterium tuberculosis and several all-oral short regimens to treat MDR TB have shown promising results. The purpose of this comprehensive review is to summarize the most important drugs currently used to treat MDR TB, the recommended regimens to treat MDR TB, and we also summarize new insights into the treatment of patients with MDR TB.

The pipeline of new molecules and regimens against drug-resistant tuberculosis

The clinical development and regulatory approval of bedaquiline, delamanid and pretomanid over the last decade brought about significant progress in the management of drug-resistant tuberculosis, providing all-oral regimens with favorable safety profiles. The Nix-TB and ZeNix trials of a bedaquiline - pretomanid - linezolid regimen demonstrated for the first time that certain forms of drug-resistant tuberculosis can be cured in the majority of patients within 6 months. Ongoing Phase 3 studies containing these drugs may further advance optimized regimen compositions. Investigational drugs in clinical development that target clinically validated mechanisms, such as second generation oxazolidinones (sutezolid, delpazolid, TBI-223) and diarylquinolines (TBAJ-876 and TBAJ-587) promise improved potency and/or safety compared to the first-in-class drugs. Compounds with novel targets involved in diverse bacterial functions such as cell wall synthesis (DrpE1, MmpL3), electron transport, DNA synthesis (GyrB), cholesterol metabolism and transcriptional regulation of ethionamide bioactivation pathways have advanced to early clinical studies with the potential to enhance antibacterial activity when added to new or established anti-TB drug regimens. Clinical validation of preclinical in vitro and animal model predictions of new anti-TB regimens may further improve the translational value of these models to identify optimal anti-TB therapies.

Efficacy of bedaquiline in the treatment of drug-resistant tuberculosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Drug-resistant tuberculosis (DR-TB) remains a major public health concern worldwide. Bedaquiline, a novel diarylquinoline, was added to the WHO-recommended all-oral regimen for patients with multidrug-resistant tuberculosis. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to determine the effect of bedaquiline on tuberculosis treatment outcomes.

METHODS

We searched the PubMed, Web of Science and EMBASE databases for relevant studies published up to March 12, 2021. We included studies in which some participants received bedaquiline and others did not. Stata version 16.0 (Stata Corp., College Station, Texas, USA) was used to analyze the results of the meta-analysis. Risk ratios (RRs) with 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs) were calculated to evaluate the effect of bedaquiline on drug-resistant tuberculosis. Between-study heterogeneity was examined by the I-squared test. Randomized controlled trials were assessed for quality using the Jadad scale, and cohort studies were assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa scale.

RESULTS

Eight studies, including 2 randomized controlled trials and 6 cohort studies involving a total of 21,836 subjects, were included. When compared with the control, bedaquiline treatment was associated with higher rates of culture conversion (risk ratio (RR):1.272 (1.165-1.389), P < 0.001). We found substantial evidence of a significant reduction in all-cause death (RR: 0.529 (0.454-0.616), P < 0.001)) in the bedaquiline treatment group. There was no significant reduction in treatment success (RR = 0.980 (0.948-1.013, P = 0.234)).

CONCLUSIONS

This study demonstrated that compared with patients who do not receive bedaquiline, this drug has the potential to achieve a higher culture conversion rate and a lower mortality risk among drug-resistant tuberculosis cases.

Pharmacokinetics of bedaquiline, delamanid and clofazimine in patients with multidrug-resistant tuberculosis

BACKGROUND

Pharmacokinetic data are needed for newly implemented anti-tuberculosis drugs to help optimize their use.

OBJECTIVES

To help fill existing knowledge gaps, we evaluated the pharmacokinetic parameters of novel and repurposed anti-tuberculosis drugs among patients with drug-resistant pulmonary tuberculosis.

METHODS

A prospective cohort study among patients ≥16 years with confirmed pulmonary drug-resistant TB was conducted in Tbilisi, Georgia. Patients receiving bedaquiline, delamanid and/or clofazimine were included. Blood samples were collected 4-6 weeks after drug initiation, and serum concentrations were measured using validated liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry assays. A non-compartmental analysis was performed, and the association of exposure parameters with covariates was explored.

RESULTS

Among 99 patients, the average age and weight were 40 years and 65 kg, respectively. The median Cmin was 0.68 mg/L for bedaquiline, 0.17 mg/L for delamanid, and 0.52 mg/L for clofazimine. The median AUC0-24 was 30.6 mg·h/L for bedaquiline, 16.1 mg·h/L for clofazimine, and the AUC0-12 was 2.9 mg·h/L for delamanid. Among the significant covariates associated with drug exposure parameters were weight and sex for bedaquiline, alcohol use for delamanid, and weight for clofazimine.

CONCLUSIONS

We found a strong association of weight with bedaquiline and clofazimine exposure parameters, suggesting the need for weight-based dosing for those agents.

Long-Term Mortality and Active Tuberculosis Disease Among Patients Who Were Lost to Follow-Up During Second-Line Tuberculosis Treatment in 2011-2014: Population-Based Study in the Country of Georgia

BACKGROUND

High rates of loss to follow-up (LFU) exist among patients with multidrug and extensively drug-resistant tuberculosis (M/XDR TB). We aimed to identify long-term clinical outcomes of patients who were LFU during second-line TB treatment.

METHODS

We conducted a follow-up study among adults who received second-line TB treatment in the country of Georgia during 2011-2014 with a final outcome of LFU. We attempted to interview all LFU patients, administered a structured questionnaire, and obtained sputum samples. Active TB at follow-up was defined by positive sputum Xpert-TB/RIF or culture.

RESULTS

Follow-up information was obtained for 461 patients. Among these patients, 107 (23%) died and 177 (38%) were contacted. Of those contacted, 123 (69%) consented to participate and 92 provided sputum samples. Thirteen (14%) had active TB with an estimated infectious time period for transmitting drug-resistant TB in the community of 480 days (interquartile range = 803). In multivariable analysis, positive culture at the time of LFU was associated with active TB at the time of our study (adjusted risk ratio = 13.3; 95% confidence interval, 4.2-42.2).

CONCLUSIONS

Approximately one quarter of patients on second-line TB treatment who were LFU died. Among those LFU evaluated in our study, 1 in 7 remained in the community with positive sputum cultures. To reduce death and transmission of disease, additional strategies are needed to encourage patients to complete treatment.

Treatment Outcomes Among Pediatric Patients With Highly Drug-Resistant Tuberculosis: The Role of New and Repurposed Second-Line Tuberculosis Drugs

BACKGROUND

Among pediatric patients with multidrug-resistant tuberculosis (MDR-TB), limited data exist regarding treatment outcomes in the context of the new and repurposed second-line TB drugs (SLDs). We aimed to describe the treatment outcomes among pediatric MDR-TB patients receiving new and repurposed SLDs including the proportion who achieved favorable outcomes.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective cohort study among pediatric patients (age ≤18 years) treated for MDR-TB in the country of Georgia from 2009 to 2016. A "new and repurposed" SLD regimen was defined as a regimen that included linezolid, bedaquiline, and/or delamanid. Favorable treatment outcome was defined by treatment completion or documented microbial "cure" status at the end of treatment. We assessed the association between the use of the new and repurposed SLDs with MDR-TB treatment outcomes using bivariate analyses and log-binomial regression.

RESULTS

There were 124 pediatric MDR-TB patients (median age: 13.7; interquartile range: 4.6-16.0) initiating treatment; 119 (96.0%) had a treatment outcome recorded and were included in our analyses. Eighteen (15.1%) patients received new and repurposed SLDs from 2015 or later. After adjusting for potential confounders, the proportion achieving favorable MDR-TB treatment outcomes was higher among patients treated with SLD regimens that included new and/or repurposed drugs when compared with those treated without (adjusted risk ratio: 1.17; 95% confidence interval: 0.51-2.72).

CONCLUSIONS

We observed a high proportion of favorable treatment outcomes among pediatric patients with MDR-TB receiving the new and repurposed SLDs. Further studies to evaluate the efficacy and children's tolerability of the new and repurposed SLDs are still warranted.

Population Pharmacokinetics of Linezolid in Tuberculosis Patients: Dosing Regimen Simulation and Target Attainment Analysis

The prolonged treatment duration for multidrug-resistant tuberculosis (MDR-TB) makes linezolid dosing difficult because of adverse effects associated with long-term use. We sought to find the optimal dosing regimen for linezolid across different MIC values. Pharmacokinetic (PK) data from TB patients were included from Brazil, Georgia, and two U.S. sites. Population PK modeling and simulation were performed. We used an fAUC (area under the unbound drug concentration-time curve)/MIC ratio of >119 as the PK/pharmacodynamic (PD) target and minimum (trough) concentrations of drug (C _mins) of 2 and 7 mg/liter as thresholds for toxicity. The PK/PD breakpoint was defined as the highest MIC at which the probability of target attainment is >90%. A total of 104 patients with pulmonary TB were included, with a median age and weight of 37 years and 60 kg. Eighty-one percent had drug-resistant TB. The PK data were best described by a one-compartment model. The PK/PD breakpoint was 0.125 mg/liter for a total daily dose of 300 mg, while daily doses of 450 to 600 mg and 900 to 1,200 mg had PK/PD breakpoints of 0.25 and 0.50 mg/liter, respectively. The probability of achieving a C _min of ≤2 mg/liter was higher when the dose was given at once than when dividing it into 2 doses. Linezolid at a daily dose of 300 mg may not be optimal. We predicted an excellent and comparable efficacy of linezolid using total daily doses of 900 and 1,200 mg for MICs of ≤0.5 mg/liter but with the potential for more toxicity than with 600 mg daily. The increase in C _min was noticeable when the daily dose was divided and may incur greater toxicity.

Interim treatment outcomes in multidrug-resistant tuberculosis using bedaquiline and/or delamanid in South Korea

PURPOSE

The Korea Centers for Disease Control & Prevention has implemented a review process for the approval of new drugs used to treat patients with multidrug-resistant tuberculosis (MDR-TB) since September 2016. Therefore, this study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of these new drugs bedaquiline (Bdq) and delamanid (Dlm).

METHODS

A total of 318 patients with MDR-TB were reviewed by the committee from September 2016 to February 2018; 282 (88.7%) of them were treated with the new drugs (Bdq, 107 patients; Dlm, 108 patients; and both concurrently or sequentially, 67 patients) and retrospectively evaluated. Culture conversion rates, interim treatment outcomes at 12 months, and predictors of unfavorable outcomes were analyzed. Treatment efficacy was also compared between Bdq and Dlm.

RESULTS

The mean age of the patients was 49.3 years, and 197 (69.9%) were male. Three patients were HIV seropositive and 151 (53.5%) were quinolone resistant. The culture conversion rates at 2 and 6 months were 57.4% (81/141) and 89.4% (126/141), respectively. A favorable outcome at 12 months was achieved in 84.8% of patients (239/282). Differences in the culture conversion rate or interim treatment outcomes were not statistically significant among the drug susceptibility test patterns or new drugs used. Multivariable analysis showed that age >60 years and body mass index of <18.5 kg/m² were significant risk factors for unfavorable outcomes at 12 months.

CONCLUSIONS

The use of new drugs resulted in satisfactory interim treatment results, without significant differences between them.