Is Piperacillin-Tazobactam Effective for the Treatment of Pyelonephritis Caused by Extended-Spectrum β-Lactamase-Producing Organisms?

Evaluation of piperacillin-tazobactam disks using contemporary Enterobacterales isolates suggests the need for disk potency optimization

Piperacillin-tazobactam (TZP) is a commonly used broad-spectrum agent. OXA-1 β-lactamases drive global Enterobacterales TZP resistance and raise MICs to the clinical breakpoints (8/4-16/4 µg/mL), making susceptibility testing challenging. Two TZP disks are used globally. The first with 100 µg piperacillin and 10 µg tazobactam, established in 1992, is used by laboratories following U.S. FDA and Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) standards. The second, with 30 µg piperacillin and 6 µg tazobactam, was developed by the European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing (EUCAST). When CLSI updated Enterobacterales TZP MIC breakpoints in 2022, it became apparent that the 100/10 µg disk may not accurately predict TZP resistance or susceptibility. In this study, we performed a disk mass titration study using 100 contemporary Enterobacterales isolates, including 40 harboring blaOXA-1. Relative to reference broth microdilution with CLSI breakpoints, categorical agreement (CA) for the 100/10 µg disk was 68% with 0.6% major errors (MEs) and 32% minor errors. The CA for the 30/6 µg disk against EUCAST breakpoints was 88% with 15% very major errors and 10% ME. A third disk developed in this study, 20/5 µg, yielded 81% CA with CLSI MIC breakpoints and disk breakpoints generated using the error-rate-bounded method. CA was 62.4%, 63.2%, and 70.9% for isolates with blaOXA-1 using the 100/10, 30/6, and 20/5 µg disks, respectively, whereas it was 71.6%, 86.9%, and 83.1% for isolates without blaOXA-1. Decreasing TZP disk potency improved the overall performance of disk diffusion and improved separation between susceptible and non-susceptible isolates, particularly those harboring OXA-1, but no disk yielded optimal results.

IMPORTANCE

In this article, we address major gaps in contemporary data for piperacillin-tazobactam (TZP) susceptibility testing and evaluate the performance of disk diffusion. TZP is the most common empiric broad-spectrum agent against Gram-negative pathogens and is used as a carbapenem-sparing regimen. OXA-1 β-lactamases drive global Enterobacterales TZP resistance and raise MICs to the clinical breakpoints, making susceptibility testing challenging. In 2022, CLSI revised the Enterobacterales TZP MIC breakpoints. Due to the lack of contemporary correlates, disk diffusion breakpoints were revised using outdated historical data from 1991 and 2003 and yielded unacceptable error rates. Additionally, there is a lack of global consensus on disk potency. The EUCAST TZP disks contain 30 μg piperacillin and 6 μg tazobactam. The CLSI disks, established after TZP approval in 1979 and prior to the widespread prevalence of ESBLs, contain 100 μg piperacillin and 10 μg tazobactam. Here, we evaluate disk diffusion using the 100/10 and 30/6 μg TZP disks with 100 contemporary Enterobacterales isolates, including 40 harboring blaOXA-1. We conducted a disk development study to determine if an alternative potency might address accuracy issues with TZP susceptibility testing. We demonstrate that decreasing TZP potency improves the performance of disk diffusion and improves separation between susceptible and non-susceptible isolates, particularly those harboring OXA-1, but no disk yielded optimal results. The alternative 20/5 μg disk yielded the lowest errors using CLSI MIC breakpoints and the best separation between susceptible isolates and isolates harboring blaOXA-1. Our study addresses an unmet need, shows that further optimization of the TZP disk potency is possible, and provides clinical laboratories with a better understanding of the performance of TZP disks using contemporary, challenging isolates. A larger, multicenter study is needed for further optimization but has been limited by a lack of funding for an off-patent antimicrobial. Our struggles in accessing funding underscore the frequent challenge with AST for older but heavily used antimicrobials.

Piperacillin/Tazobactam Susceptibility Test Interpretive Criteria for Enterobacterales: Recommendations From the United States Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing

The in vitro susceptibility testing interpretive criteria (STIC) for piperacillin/tazobactam (TZP) against Enterobacterales were recently updated by the US Food and Drug Administration, Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute, and European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing. The United States Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing (USCAST) also recently reviewed TZP STIC for Enterobacterales and arrived at different STIC for Enterobacterales. Here, we explain our recommendations and rationale behind them. Based on our review of the available data, USCAST does not recommend TZP STIC for certain Enterobacterales species that have a moderate to high likelihood of clinically significant AmpC production (Enterobacter cloacae, Citrobacter freundii, and Klebsiella aerogenes only) or for third-generation cephalosporin-nonsusceptible Enterobacterales. USCAST recommends a TZP susceptibility breakpoint of ≤ 16/4 mg/L for third-generation cephalosporin-susceptible Enterobacterales and only endorses the use of extended infusion TZP regimens for patients with infections due to these pathogens.

Evaluation of the Efficacy of Piperacillin/Tazobactam in Extended-Spectrum Beta-Lactamase-Producing Enterobacteriaceae Urinary Tract Infections: A Systematic Review of the Literature

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the efficacy of piperacillin/tazobactam (PTZ) for the treatment of extended-spectrum beta-lactamase-producing enterobacteriaceae (ESBL-PE) urinary tract infections (UTIs).

DATA SOURCES

A systematic review was conducted in accordance with Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) standards on PubMed, MEDLINE, Embase, Web of Science Core Collection, and Cochrane Central through July 2024.

STUDY SELECTION AND DATA EXTRACTION

Studies providing efficacy data associated with PTZ in patients ≥18 years old experiencing an ESBL-PE UTI that documented clinical and microbiological cure data were included.

DATA SYNTHESIS

A total of 577 articles were obtained for screening. After applying the inclusion and exclusion criteria, 7 studies comparing PTZ with carbapenems comprised of 1156 patient cases were analyzed. Piperacillin/tazobactam was found to be noninferior to carbapenems in the treatment of both uncomplicated and complicated UTI's caused by ESBL-PE. The observed noninferiority encompassed clinical response, clinical cure, and microbiological cure outcome metrics. Although not specifically evaluated in this systematic review, adverse effects associated with PTZ were found to be minimal and lesser in incidence than with the carbapenem comparators in aggregate.

RELEVANCE TO PATIENT CARE AND CLINICAL PRACTICE

While a definitive dosing strategy remains elusive, a PTZ total daily dose of 13.5 g infused over 3 to 4 hours may be appropriate for this indication.

CONCLUSION

Piperacillin/tazobactam may be an effective carbapenem-sparing agent for the treatment of ESBL-PE UTIs that show in-vitro susceptibility to PTZ. However, additional robust randomized clinical trials are still needed to validate the findings of this review and determine the best dosage regimen of PTZ for ESBL-PE UTIs.

The impact of meropenem shortage and post-prescription review and feedback on broad-spectrum antimicrobial use: An interrupted time-series analysis

Background

Meropenem (MEPM) holds significance in treating severe infections and drug-resistant bacteria. There are concerns that antimicrobial shortages may lead to the use of alternative antimicrobials that are less effective and safer. We have responded to the MEPM shortage with post-prescription monitoring and feedback (PPRF) with no restrictions on MEPM initiation. We aimed to assess the impact of the MEPM shortage and the PPRF on broad-spectrum antimicrobial use and mortality.

Methods

This retrospective study was conducted in a single hospital in Japan. The period from October 2021 to August 2022 was defined as the period before the MEPM shortage, and the period from September 2022 to March 2023 was defined as the period during the MEPM shortage. To support the appropriate use of antimicrobials during MEPM shortages, the antimicrobial stewardship team (AST) developed a list of alternatives to MEPM. An interrupted time series analysis was used to assess changes in use and mortality among patients receiving broad-spectrum antimicrobials over the study period.

Discussion

The shortage of MEPM and PPRF temporarily increased the use of alternative cefepime; however, the subsequent change in days of therapy and days of coverage of broad-spectrum antimicrobials suggests a decrease in the use of these antimicrobials. Despite these shifts, the mortality rates remained stable, suggesting that the response to the shortage did not adversely affect treatment outcomes.

Conclusion

In the context of antimicrobial shortages, AST support plays an important role in enabling physicians to make optimal use of antimicrobials.

Treatment of infections caused by multidrug-resistant Gram-negative bacilli: A practical approach by the Italian (SIMIT) and French (SPILF) Societies of Infectious Diseases

INTRODUCTION

The emergence of multidrug-resistant Gram-negative bacilli and the development of new antibiotics have complicated the selection of optimal regimens. International guidelines are valuable tools, but are limited by the scarcity of high-quality randomized trials in many situations.

METHODS

A panel of experts from the French and Italian Societies of Infectious Diseases aimed to address unresolved issues in clinical practice based on their experience, an updated literature review and open discussions.

RESULTS

The panel reached consensus for the following 'first choices': (i) cefepime for ventilator-acquired pneumonia due to AmpC β-lactamase-producing Enterobacterales; (ii) the β-lactam/β-lactamase inhibitor combination most active in vitro, or cefiderocol combined with fosfomycin, and aerosolized colistin or aminoglycosides, for severe pneumonia due to Pseudomonas aeruginosa resistant to ceftolozane-tazobactam; (iii) high-dose piperacillin-tazobactam (including loading dose and continuous infusion) for complicated urinary tract infections (cUTIs) caused by extended-spectrum β-lactamase-producing Enterobacterales with piperacillin-tazobactam minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) ≤8 mg/L; (iv) high-dose cefepime for cUTIs due to AmpC β-lactamase-producing Enterobacterales other than Enterobacter spp. if cefepime MIC ≤2 mg/L; (v) ceftolozane-tazobactam or ceftazidime-avibactam plus metronidazole for intra-abdominal infections (IAIs) due to third-generation cephalosporin-resistant Enterobacterales; (vi) ceftazidime-avibactam plus aztreonam plus metronidazole for IAIs due to metallo-β-lactamase-producing Enterobacterales; (vii) ampicillin-sulbactam plus colistin for bloodstream infections (BSIs) caused by carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii; (viii) meropenem-vaborbactam for BSIs caused by Klebsiella pneumoniae carbapenemase-producing Enterobacterales; and (ix) ceftazidime-avibactam plus fosfomycin for neurological infections caused by carbapenem-resistant P. aeruginosa.

CONCLUSIONS

These expert choices were based on the necessary balance between antimicrobial stewardship principles and the need to provide optimal treatment for individual patients in each situation.

Impact of removing ESBL status labelling from culture reports on the use of carbapenems for non-bacteraemic patients diagnosed with ESBL-positive urinary tract infections

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate carbapenem prescribing rates for initial definitive treatment of urinary tract infections and clinical outcomes before and after removing ESBL status labels on antibiotic susceptibility reports.

METHODS

This was a retrospective cohort study of adult patients treated for at least 48 h for an ESBL-producing/ceftriaxone-resistant Enterobacterales urinary tract infection. ESBL status reporting ceased in September 2022 for a network of seven community hospitals within the USA. The primary endpoint was the rate of carbapenem prescribing for initial definitive treatment of urinary tract infections. Secondary endpoints included total days of therapy for initial definitive treatment with carbapenems, clinical cure rates, time to transition to oral antibiotic therapy for initial definitive treatment, rate of guideline-compliant therapy, rate of relapsed infection within 30 days, 30 day readmission rate, and 30 day all-cause in-hospital mortality.

RESULTS

Of 3055 patients screened, 199 were included in the pre group and 153 were included in the post group. The rate of carbapenem prescribing for initial definitive treatment was 156 patients (78%) in the pre group, compared with 93 patients (61%) in the post group (P = <0.01). Days of therapy for initial definitive therapy with carbapenem was 620 in the pre group compared with 372 in the post group (P < 0.01). There was no difference between other secondary outcomes.

CONCLUSIONS

Removing ESBL status labels from laboratory reports reduced carbapenem use for initial definitive treatment of urinary tract infections from 78% to 61% (P < 0.01) without impacting clinical outcomes.

Piperacillin-Tazobactam versus Cefotaxime as Empiric Treatment for Febrile Urinary Tract Infection in Hospitalized Children

BACKGROUND

According to international pediatric urinary tract infection (UTI) guidelines, selecting ampicillin/sulbactam or amoxicillin/clavulanate is recommended as the first-line treatment for pediatric UTI. In Korea, elevated resistance to ampicillin and ampicillin/sulbactam has resulted in the widespread use of third-generation cephalosporins for treating pediatric UTIs. This study aims to compare the efficacy of piperacillin-tazobactam (TZP) and cefotaxime (CTX) as first-line treatments in hospitalized children with UTIs.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The study, conducted at Jeju National University Hospital, retrospectively analyzed medical records of children hospitalized for febrile UTIs between 2014 and 2017. UTI diagnosis included unexplained fever, abnormal urinalysis, and the presence of significant uropathogens. Treatment responses, recurrence, and antimicrobial susceptibility were assessed.

RESULTS

Out of 323 patients, 220 met the inclusion criteria. Demographics and clinical characteristics were similar between TZP and CTX groups. For children aged ≥3 months, no significant differences were found in treatment responses and recurrence. Extended-spectrum beta-lactamase (ESBL)-positive strains were associated with recurrence in those <3 months.

CONCLUSION

In Korea, escalating resistance to empirical antibiotics has led to the adoption of broad-spectrum empirical treatment. TZP emerged as a viable alternative to CTX for hospitalized children aged ≥3 months with UTIs. Consideration of ESBL-positive strains and individualized approaches for those <3 months are crucial.

Evaluation of Oral Amoxicillin/Clavulanate for Urinary Tract Infections Caused by Ceftriaxone Non-Susceptible Enterobacterales

Urinary tract infections (UTIs) are one of the most common infections and are frequently caused by Gram-negative organisms. The rise of resistant isolates has prompted evaluation of alternative therapies, including amoxicillin-clavulanate which has potent activity against Ambler class A enzymes. This study sought to evaluate clinical outcomes of patients with ceftriaxone non-susceptible UTIs receiving amoxicillin-clavulanate or standard of care (SOC). This was a single-center, retrospective, cohort study of adult patients with urinary tract infections caused by a ceftriaxone non-susceptible pathogen who received amoxicillin-clavulanate or SOC. The primary outcome was clinical failure at 90 days. Secondary outcomes included time to failure, isolation of a resistant organism, and hospital length of stay. Fifty-nine patients met study inclusion: 26 received amoxicillin/clavulanate and 33 received SOC. Amoxicillin-clavulanate recipients did not have higher failure rates compared to SOC recipients. For patients requiring hospital admission, hospital length of stay was numerically shorter with amoxicillin-clavulanate. The frequency of amoxicillin-clavulanate and carbapenem-resistant organisms did not differ significantly between groups. Amoxicillin-clavulanate may be a useful alternative therapy for the treatment of ceftriaxone non-susceptible Enterobacterales UTIs.

Comparative Impact of an Optimized PK/PD Target Attainment of Piperacillin-Tazobactam vs. Meropenem on the Trend over Time of SOFA Score and Inflammatory Biomarkers in Critically Ill Patients Receiving Continuous Infusion Monotherapy for Treating Documented Gram-Negative BSIs and/or VAP

(1) Background: The advantage of using carbapenems over beta-lactam/beta-lactamase inhibitor combinations in critically ill septic patients still remains a debated issue. We aimed to assess the comparative impact of an optimized pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) target attainment of piperacillin-tazobactam vs. meropenem on the trend over time of both Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score and inflammatory biomarkers in critically ill patients receiving continuous infusion (CI) monotherapy with piperacillin-tazobactam or meropenem for treating documented Gram-negative bloodstream infections (BSI) and/or ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP). (2) Methods: We performed a retrospective observational study comparing critically ill patients receiving targeted treatment with CI meropenem monotherapy for documented Gram-negative BSIs or VAP with a historical cohort of critical patients receiving CI piperacillin-tazobactam monotherapy. Patients included in the two groups were admitted to the general and post-transplant intensive care unit in the period July 2021-September 2023 and fulfilled the same inclusion criteria. The delta values of the SOFA score between the baseline of meropenem or piperacillin-tazobactam treatment and those at 48-h (delta 48-h SOFA score) or at 7-days (delta 7-days SOFA) were selected as primary outcomes. Delta 48-h and 7-days C-reactive protein (CRP) and procalcitonin (PCT), microbiological eradication, resistance occurrence, clinical cure, multi-drug resistant colonization at 90-day, ICU, and 30-day mortality rate were selected as secondary outcomes. Univariate analysis comparing primary and secondary outcomes between critically ill patients receiving CI monotherapy with piperacillin-tazobactam vs. meropenem was carried out. (3) Results: Overall, 32 critically ill patients receiving CI meropenem monotherapy were compared with a historical cohort of 43 cases receiving CI piperacillin-tazobactam monotherapy. No significant differences in terms of demographics and clinical features emerged at baseline between the two groups. Optimal PK/PD target was attained in 83.7% and 100.0% of patients receiving piperacillin-tazobactam and meropenem, respectively. No significant differences were observed between groups in terms of median values of delta 48-h SOFA (0 points vs. 1 point; p = 0.89) and median delta 7-days SOFA (2 points vs. 1 point; p = 0.43). Similarly, no significant differences were found between patients receiving piperacillin-tazobactam vs. meropenem for any of the secondary outcomes. (4) Conclusion: Our findings may support the contention that in critically ill patients with documented Gram-negative BSIs and/or VAP, the decreases in the SOFA score and in the inflammatory biomarkers serum levels achievable with CI piperacillin-tazobactam monotherapy at 48-h and at 7-days may be of similar extent and as effective as to those achievable with CI meropenem monotherapy provided that optimization on real-time by means of a TDM-based expert clinical pharmacological advice program is granted.

Real-Time TDM-Guided Optimal Joint PK/PD Target Attainment of Continuous Infusion Piperacillin-Tazobactam Monotherapy Is an Effective Carbapenem-Sparing Strategy for Treating Non-Severe ESBL-Producing Enterobacterales Secondary Bloodstream Infections: Findings from a Prospective Pilot Study

(1) Objectives: To assess the impact of optimal joint pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) target attainment of continuous infusion (CI) piperacillin-tazobactam monotherapy on the microbiological outcome of documented ESBL-producing Enterobacterlaes secondary bloodstream infections (BSIs). (2) Methods: Patients hospitalized in the period January 2022-October 2023, having a documented secondary BSI caused by ESBL-producing Enterobacterales, and being eligible for definitive targeted CI piperacillin-tazobactam monotherapy according to specific pre-defined inclusion criteria (i.e., absence of septic shock at onset; favorable clinical evolution in the first 48 h after starting treatment; low-intermediate risk primary infection source) were prospectively enrolled. A real-time therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM)-guided expert clinical pharmacological advice (ECPA) program was adopted for optimizing (PK/PD) target attainment of CI piperacillin-tazobactam monotherapy. Steady-state plasma concentrations (Css) of both piperacillin and tazobactam were measured, and the free fractions (f) were calculated based on theoretical protein binding. The joint PK/PD target attainment was considered optimal whenever the piperacillin fCss/MIC ratio was >4 and the tazobactam fCss/target concentration (CT) ratio was >1 (quasi-optimal or suboptimal if only one or neither of the two thresholds were achieved, respectively). Univariate analysis was carried out for assessing variables potentially associated with failure in achieving the optimal joint PK/PD target of piperacillin-tazobactam and microbiological eradication. (3) Results: Overall, 35 patients (median age 79 years; male 51.4%) were prospectively included. Secondary BSIs resulted from urinary tract infections as a primary source in 77.2% of cases. The joint PK/PD target attainment was optimal in as many as 97.1% of patients (34/35). Microbiological eradication occurred in 91.4% of cases (32/35). Attaining the quasi-optimal/suboptimal joint PK/PD target of CI piperacillin-tazobactam showed a trend toward a higher risk of microbiological failure (33.3% vs. 0.0%; p = 0.08) (4) Conclusions: Real-time TDM-guided optimal joint PK/PD target attainment of CI piperacillin-tazobactam monotherapy may represent a valuable and effective carbapenem-sparing strategy when dealing with non-severe ESBL-producing Enterobacterales secondary BSIs.

From Epidemiology of Community-Onset Bloodstream Infections to the Development of Empirical Antimicrobial Treatment-Decision Algorithm in a Region with High Burden of Antimicrobial Resistance

Antimicrobial-resistant (AMR) infections have increased in community settings. Our objectives were to study the epidemiology of community-onset bloodstream infections (BSIs), identify risk factors for AMR-BSI and mortality-related factors, and develop the empirical antimicrobial treatment-decision algorithm. All adult, positive blood cultures at the emergency room and outpatient clinics were evaluated from 08/2021 to 04/2022. AMR was defined as the resistance of organisms to an antimicrobial to which they were previously sensitive. A total of 1151 positive blood cultures were identified. There were 450 initial episodes of bacterial BSI, and 114 BSIs (25%) were AMR-BSI. Non-susceptibility to ceftriaxone was detected in 40.9% of 195 E. coli isolates and 16.4% among 67 K. pneumoniae isolates. A treatment-decision algorithm was developed using the independent risk factors for AMR-BSI: presence of multidrug-resistant organisms (MDROs) within 90 days (aOR 3.63), prior antimicrobial exposure within 90 days (aOR 1.94), and urinary source (aOR 1.79). The positive and negative predictive values were 53.3% and 83.2%, respectively. The C-statistic was 0.73. Factors significantly associated with 30-day all-cause mortality were Pitt bacteremia score (aHR 1.39), solid malignancy (aHR 2.61), and urinary source (aHR 0.30). In conclusion, one-fourth of community-onset BSI were antimicrobial-resistant, and one-third of Enterobacteriaceae were non-susceptible to ceftriaxone. Treatment-decision algorithms may reduce overly broad antimicrobial treatment.

Study of antibiotic resistance and virulence genes in Escherichia coli isolated from urinary tract infection patients in Tanta University Hospitals

This study aimed to investigate the prevalence of antibiotic resistance genes CTX-M and Qnr, as well as the virulence genes HlyA, Pap, CNF1, and Afa, in uropathogenic Escherichia coli (UPEC) isolates from the Egyptian population. In this cross-sectional study, a total of 50 E. coli isolates were collected from urine samples from patients with urinary tract infections (UTIs) admitted to Tanta University Hospital from December 2020 to November 2021. The isolates were cultured, identified, and tested for antibiotic susceptibility by the disc diffusion method. The CTX-M, Qnr (QnrA, B, and S), Pap, CNF1, HlyA, and Afa genes were detected by polymerase chain reaction in UPEC isolates. The Pap, CNF1, HlyA, and Afa genes were found to be positive in 18%, 12%, 10%, and 2% of the isolates, respectively. In addition, CTX-M and QnrS were found to be positive in 44% and 8% of the isolates, while QnrA and B were not detected. Furthermore, positive Pap, CNF1, and HlyA genes were significantly associated with both upper and lower UTIs, increased frequency, urgency, and dysuria, and complicated UTIs, as well as pyuria over 100 white blood cells per high-power field. In conclusion, the prevalence of virulence and antibiotic resistance genes varies by population. At our hospital, the Pap gene is the most prevalent virulence gene and was strongly associated with complicated UTIs, while the CTX-M and QnrS genes were the most prevalent and related to antibiotic resistance. Our findings, however, should be interpreted with caution due to the small sample size.

Definitions of Urinary Tract Infection in Current Research: A Systematic Review

Defining urinary tract infection (UTI) is complex, as numerous clinical and diagnostic parameters are involved. In this systematic review, we aimed to gain insight into how UTI is defined across current studies. We included 47 studies, published between January 2019 and May 2022, investigating therapeutic or prophylactic interventions in adult patients with UTI. Signs and symptoms, pyuria, and a positive urine culture were required in 85%, 28%, and 55% of study definitions, respectively. Five studies (11%) required all 3 categories for the diagnosis of UTI. Thresholds for significant bacteriuria varied from 103 to 105 colony-forming units/mL. None of the 12 studies including acute cystitis and 2 of 12 (17%) defining acute pyelonephritis used identical definitions. Complicated UTI was defined by both host factors and systemic involvement in 9 of 14 (64%) studies. In conclusion, UTI definitions are heterogeneous across recent studies, highlighting the need for a consensus-based, research reference standard for UTI.

Assessing clinical cure of empirical piperacillin/tazobactam for ESBL urinary tract infections (ACCEPT-UTI)

Background

Data are limited regarding use of piperacillin/tazobactam for ESBL urinary tract infections (UTIs). The objective of this study was to compare clinical outcomes of patients treated empirically with piperacillin/tazobactam versus carbapenems for ESBL UTIs.

Methods

This retrospective, observational, propensity score-matched study evaluated adults with an ESBL on urine culture. Patients who had UTI symptoms or leukocytosis, and who received a carbapenem or piperacillin/tazobactam empirically for at least 48 h were included. The primary outcome was clinical success within 48 h, defined as resolution of temperature (36-38°C), resolution of symptoms or leukocytosis (WBC <12 × 10³/μL) in the absence of documented symptoms, and the absence of readmission for an ESBL UTI within 6 months. Secondary outcomes included time to clinical resolution, hospital length of stay, and in-hospital and 30 day all-cause mortality.

Results

Overall, 223 patients were included in the full cohort and 200 patients in the matched cohort (piperacillin/tazobactam = 100, carbapenem = 100). Baseline characteristics were similar between the groups. There was no difference in the primary outcome of clinical success between the carbapenem and piperacillin/tazobactam groups (58% versus 56%, respectively; P = 0.76). Additionally, there was no difference in median (IQR) time to clinical resolution [38.9 h (21.5, 50.9 h) versus 40.3 h (27.4, 57.5 h); P = 0.37], in-hospital all-cause mortality (3% versus 3%; P = 1.00), or 30 day all-cause mortality (4% versus 2%; P = 0.68) between the carbapenem and piperacillin/tazobactam groups, respectively.

Conclusions

There was no significant difference in clinical success for patients treated empirically with piperacillin/tazobactam compared with carbapenems for ESBL UTIs.

Re-evaluation of cefepime or piperacillin/tazobactam to decrease use of carbapenems in ESBL-producing Enterobacterales urinary tract infections (REDUCE-UTI)

Objectives

To re-examine the use of non-carbapenems (NCBPs), specifically piperacillin/tazobactam and cefepime, for ESBL-producing Enterobacterales (ESBL-E) urinary tract infections (UTIs).

Patients

Retrospective cohort study of adults hospitalized between January 2016 and June 2020 with pyuria on urinalysis, a urine culture positive for ESBL-E treated with a study antibiotic (meropenem, ertapenem, cefepime or piperacillin/tazobactam) and did not meet criteria for study exclusion.

Methods

To compare carbapenems (CBPs) with cefepime or piperacillin/tazobactam for the treatment of ESBL-E UTI. The primary outcome was clinical cure, defined as complete resolution of signs and symptoms of infection. Secondary outcomes included in-hospital mortality, recurrence within 30 days and resistance emergence within 30 days.

Results

One-hundred and thirty-three patients were included, based on definitive therapy received; 69 (51.9%) received CBP and 64 (48.1%) received NCBP therapy. Of the total patient population, 17 (12.8%) were admitted to the ICU, 84 (63.1%) had a complicated UTI and 64 (48.1%) had pyelonephritis. There was no difference in clinical cure between the CBP and NCBP groups (95.7% versus 96.9%, P = 0.999). Additionally, no differences in secondary outcomes were observed.

Conclusions

When compared with CBPs, cefepime and piperacillin/tazobactam resulted in similar clinical cure, in-hospital mortality, recurrence and resistance emergence in the treatment of ESBL-E UTI.

Efficacy of carbapenem vs non carbapenem β-lactam therapy as empiric antimicrobial therapy in patients with extended-spectrum β-lactamase-producing Enterobacterales urinary septic shock: a propensity-weighted multicenter cohort study

BACKGROUND

The rise in antimicrobial resistance is a global threat responsible for about 33,000 deaths in 2015 with a particular concern for extended-spectrum beta-lactamase-producing Enterobacterales (ESBL-E) and has led to a major increase in the use of carbapenems, last-resort antibiotics.

METHODS

In this retrospective propensity-weighted multicenter observational study conducted in 11 ICUs, the purpose was to assess the efficacy of non carbapenem regimen (piperacillin-tazobactam (PTZ) + aminoglycosides or 3rd-generation cephalosporin (3GC) + aminoglycosides) as empiric therapy in comparison with carbapenem in extended-spectrum β-lactamase-producing Enterobacterales (ESBL-E) urinary septic shock. The primary outcome was Day-30 mortality.

RESULTS

Among 156 patients included in this study, 69 received a carbapenem and 87 received non carbapenem antibiotics as empiric treatment. Baseline clinical characteristics were similar between the two groups. Patients who received carbapenem had similar Day-30 mortality (10/69 (15%) vs 6/87 (7%), OR = 1.99 [0.55; 5.34] p = 0.16), illness severity, resolution of septic shock, and ESBL-E infection recurrence rates than patients who received an empiric non carbapenem therapy. The rates of secondary infection with C. difficile were comparable.

CONCLUSIONS

In ESBL-E urinary septic shock, empiric treatment with a non carbapenem regimen, including systematically aminoglycosides, was not associated with higher mortality, compared to a carbapenem regimen.

A Systematic Review on the Occurrence of Antimicrobial-Resistant Escherichia coli in Poultry and Poultry Environments in Bangladesh between 2010 and 2021

Antimicrobial resistance (AMR) is a significant public health issue in Bangladesh like many other developing countries where data on resistance trends are scarce. Moreover, the existence of multidrug-resistant (MDR) Escherichia coli exerts an ominous effect on the poultry sector. Therefore, the current systematic review, following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines, was conducted to find out the AMR scenarios in E. coli isolates sourced from poultry and poultry environments in Bangladesh between 2010 and 2021. Following the PRISMA guidelines, a total of 17 published scientific articles were selected for this systematic review. This review revealed that 18 out of 64 districts in Bangladesh reported E. coli in poultry, having a higher prevalence (combined prevalence: 69.3%, 95% confidence interval, CI: 67.3-71%). Moreover, the prevalence ranged from 24.3% to 100%. This review found that E. coli isolates showed resistance to 14 antimicrobial classes and 45 different antimicrobial agents, including the last-line (reserve group) antibiotics and banned antimicrobial categories for the treatment of infections in agricultural animals. Phenotypic resistance of E. coli against penicillins and beta-lactamase inhibitors (20.2%-100%), cephalosporins (1.9%-100%), fluoroquinolones (5.98%-100%), aminoglycosides (6%-100%), tetracyclines (17.7%-100%), carbapenems (13.6%-72.7%), macrolides (11.8%-100%), polymyxins (7.9%-100%), phenicols (20%-97.2%), sulfa drugs (44.7%-100%), cephamycins (21.4%-48.8%), nitrofurans (21.4%-63.2%), monobactams (1.2%), and glycylcyclines (2.3%) was recorded in the last decades in Bangladesh. Also, 14 articles reported MDR E. coli in poultry, including a 100% MDR in nine articles and a 92.7% (95% CI: 91.2-94%) combined percentage of MDR E. coli isolates. Twenty-four different AMR genes encoding resistance to beta-lactams (bla _TEM, bla _CTX-M-1, bla _CTX-M-2, bla _CTX-M-9, bla _OXA-1, bla _OXA-47, bla _SHV, and CITM), colistin (mcr1 and mcr3), fluoroquinolones (qnrB and qnrS), tetracyclines (tetA, tetB, and tetC), sulfonamides (sulI and sulII), trimethoprim (dfrA1), aminoglycosides (rmtB), streptomycin (aadA1), gentamicin (aac-3-IV), erythromycin (ereA), and chloramphenicol (catA1 and cmlA) were detected in E. coli isolates. The presence of MDR E. coli and their corresponding resistance genes in poultry and poultry environments is an alarming issue for all health communities in Bangladesh. We suggest a regular antimicrobial surveillance program with a strong One Health approach to lessen the hazardous effects of AMR E. coli in poultry industries in Bangladesh.

Long Term Characteristics of Clinical Distribution and Resistance Trends of Carbapenem-Resistant and Extended-Spectrum β-Lactamase Klebsiella pneumoniae Infections: 2014-2022

Purpose

Through long-term and large sample size statistical analysis, we revealed the pattern of Klebsiella pneumoniae (KP) infection and drug resistance and provided epidemiological data for the treatment and prevention and control of multidrug-resistant bacterial infection in our hospital.

Patients and Methods

Strains were identified using the BD Phoenix^TM100 system, minimal inhibitory concentration of antibiotics were determined by the broth method, and data were statistically analyzed using WHONET 5.6 and SPSS27.0.

Results

The isolation rate of KP from Enterobacteriaceae (26.2%, 4547/17358) in our hospital showed an increasing annual trend, ranking second only to Escherichia coli. Carbapenem-resistant KP (CRKP) accounted for the highest proportion of carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae (72.2%, 431/597), showing an upward trend. Infected patients had a male-to-female ratio of approximately 2:1 and were mainly >60 years of age (66.2%), with intensive care units being the most commonly distributed department. Sputum was the most common specimen type (74.0%). Compared with spring and summer, autumn and winter were the main epidemic seasons for KP and extended-spectrum β-lactamase KP (ESBL-KP). The resistance rate of KP to common antibiotics was low, but all showed an increasing trend each year. ESBL-KP was >90% resistant to piperacillin, amoxicillin/clavulanic acid, and cefotaxime and less resistant to other common antibiotics, but showed an increasing trend in resistance to most antibiotics. CRKP resistance to common antibiotics was high, with resistance rates >90%, excluding amikacin (64.1%), gentamicin (87.4%), cotrimoxazole (44.3%), chloramphenicol (13.6%), and tetracycline (30.5%).

Conclusion

KP in our hospital mainly caused pulmonary infection in older men, which occurred frequently in autumn and winter, and the isolation and drug resistance rates showed an increasing trend. Age over 70 years, admission to intensive care unit, and urinary tract infection were found to be the risk factors for CRKP and ESBL-KP-resistance.

Pragmatic Comparison of Piperacillin/Tazobactam versus Carbapenems in Treating Patients with Nosocomial Pneumonia Caused by Extended-Spectrum β-Lactamase-Producing Klebsiella pneumoniae

The effectiveness of piperacillin/tazobactam for managing nosocomial pneumonia caused by extended-spectrum β-lactamase (ESBL)-producing Enterobacteriaceae is unknown. To answer this question, we conducted a retrospective cohort study in two tertiary teaching hospitals of patients admitted between January 2018 and July 2021 with a diagnosis of nosocomial pneumonia caused by ESBL-producing K. pneumoniae receiving either piperacillin/tazobactam or carbapenems within 24 h from the onset of pneumonia for at least 72 h. Clinical outcomes, including 28-day mortality and 14-day clinical and microbiological cure, were analyzed. Of the 136 total patients, 64 received piperacillin/tazobactam and 72 received carbapenems. The overall 28-day mortality was 19.1% (26/136). In the inverse probability of treatment weighted cohort, piperacillin/tazobactam therapy was not associated with worse clinical outcomes, as the 28-day mortality (OR, 0.82, 95% CI, 0.23–2.87, p = 0.748), clinical cure (OR, 0.94, 95% CI, 0.38–2.35, p = 0.894), and microbiological cure (OR, 1.10, 95% CI, 0.53–2.30, p = 0.798) were comparable to those of carbapenems. Subgroup analyses also did not demonstrate any statistical differences. In conclusion, piperacillin/tazobactam could be an effective alternative to carbapenems for treating nosocomial pneumonia due to ESBL-producing K. pneumoniae when the MICs are ≤8 mg/L.

Pharmacokinetics, efficacy and tolerance of cefoxitin in the treatment of cefoxitin-susceptible extended-spectrum beta-lactamase producing Enterobacterales infections in critically ill patients: a retrospective single-center study

BACKGROUND

Cefoxitin is active against some extended-spectrum beta-lactamase-producing Enterobacterales (ESBL-PE), but has not been evaluated so far in the intensive care unit (ICU) settings. Data upon its pharmacokinetics (PK), tolerance and efficacy in critical conditions are scanty. We performed a retrospective single-center study in a university hospital medical ICU, in subjects presenting with cefoxitin-susceptible ESBL-PE infection and treated with cefoxitin. The primary aim was to determine cefoxitin PK. Secondary endpoints were efficacy, tolerance, and emergence of cephamycin-resistance.

RESULTS

Forty-one patients were included in this study, mainly with ESBL-PE pneumonia (35 patients, 85%). Cefoxitin was administered during a median [interquartile range (IQR)] duration of 5 [4-7] days. Cefoxitin serum concentrations strongly depended on renal function. Target serum concentration (> 5 × minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) 24 h after cefoxitin onset was obtained in 34 patients (83%), using a median [IQR] daily dose of 6 [6-6] g with continuous administration. The standard dosage of 6 g/24 h was not sufficient to achieve the PK/PD target serum concentration for MIC up to 4-8 mg/L, except in patients with severe renal impairment and those treated with renal replacement therapy. Treatment failure occurred in 26 cases (63%), among whom 12 patients (29%) died, 13 patients (32%) were switched to alternative antibiotic therapy and 11 patients (27%) presented with relapse of infection with the same ESBL-PE. Serious adverse events attributed to cefoxitin occurred in 7 patients (17%). Acquisition of cephamycin-resistance with the same Enterobacterales was identified in 13 patients (32%), and was associated with underdosage.

CONCLUSION

Continuous administration of large doses of cefoxitin appears necessary to achieve the PK/PD target in patients with normal renal function. Renal status, MIC determination and therapeutic drug monitoring may be useful for treatment individualization in this setting. The treatment failure rate was 63%. The cefoxitin safety profile was favorable, but we observed a high rate of cephamycin-resistance emergence.

In Vitro Activity of Tebipenem against Various Resistant Subsets of Escherichia coli Causing Urinary Tract Infections in the United States (2018 to 2020)

This study investigated the activity of an oral carbapenem, tebipenem, against various molecularly characterized subsets of Escherichia coli. A total of 15.0% of E. coli isolates (360/2,035 isolates) met the MIC criteria for screening for β-lactamases. Most of those isolates (74.7% [269/360 isolates]) carried bla_CTX-M. The CTX-M distribution varied (50% to 86%) among Census Regions, as did that of plasmid AmpC genes (up to 41% among E. coli isolates from the New England Region). Tebipenem and intravenous carbapenems showed uniform activity against various E. coli subsets.

Pharmacodynamics of Piperacillin-Tazobactam/Amikacin Combination versus Meropenem against Extended-Spectrum β-Lactamase-Producing Escherichia coli in a Hollow Fiber Infection Model

Carbapenems are recommended for the treatment of urosepsis caused by extended-spectrum β-lactamase (ESBL)-producing, multidrug-resistant Escherichia coli; however, due to selection of carbapenem resistance, there is an increasing interest in alternative treatment regimens including the use of β-lactam-aminoglycoside combinations. We compared the pharmacodynamic activity of piperacillin-tazobactam and amikacin as mono and combination therapy versus meropenem monotherapy against extended-spectrum β-lactamase (ESBL)-producing, piperacillin-tazobactam resistant E. coli using a dynamic hollow fiber infection model (HFIM) over 7 days. Broth-microdilution was performed to determine the MIC of E. coli isolates. Whole genome sequencing was conducted. Four E. coli isolates were tested in HFIM with an initial inoculum of ~107 CFU/mL. Dosing regimens tested were piperacillin-tazobactam 4.5 g, 6-hourly, plus amikacin 30 mg/kg, 24-hourly, as combination therapy, and piperacillin-tazobactam 4.5 g, 6-hourly, amikacin 30 mg/kg, 24-hourly, and meropenem 1 g, 8-hourly, each as monotherapy. We observed that piperacillin-tazobactam and amikacin monotherapy demonstrated initial rapid bacterial killing but then led to amplification of resistant subpopulations. The piperacillin-tazobactam/amikacin combination and meropenem experiments both attained a rapid bacterial killing (~4-5 log10) within 24 h and did not result in any emergence of resistant subpopulations. Genome sequencing demonstrated that all ESBL-producing E. coli clinical isolates carried multiple antibiotic resistance genes including blaCTX-M-15, blaOXA-1, blaEC, blaTEM-1, and aac(6')-Ib-cr. These results suggest that the combination of piperacillin-tazobactam/amikacin may have a potential role as a carbapenem-sparing regimen, which should be tested in future urosepsis clinical trials.

A review of recent advances in the treatment of adults with complicated urinary tract infection

INTRODUCTION

Complicated urinary tract infections (cUTIs) entail diverse clinical conditions that could be managed differently and not necessarily with premature empiric therapy. Since multidrug-resistant organisms (MDROs) are widely spreading worldwide, the possibility of encountering these resistant bacteria is inevitably part of the daily life of physicians who manage cUTIs.

AREAS COVERED

The advances in the management of cUTIs are explored, illustrating: 1) a proposed therapeutical approach to cUTIs within the antimicrobial stewardship context; 2) evidence regarding novel antibiotics targeting MDROs. Evidence research has been performed through MEDLINE/PubMed using appropriate keywords and terms regarding cUTIs published before June 2022.

EXPERT OPINION

Novel antimicrobial drugs are available in the clinicians' armamentarium. Selecting the optimal therapy for suitable patients may be challenging given the multifaceted group of cUTIs. Carbapenems use is widely increasing, the role of old β-lactam/β-lactamase inhibitors is constantly revised, and novel drugs lack real-life studies. Understanding the different ranges of the complexity of patients affected by cUTIs may help select the most suitable antibiotic for every single case. More multicentric observational studies targeting cUTIs are needed to elucidate the appropriate drug based on patient characteristics and presentations, providing stronger recommendations for cases encountered in everyday clinical practice.

Antibiotics for multidrug-resistant gram-negative bacteria

Background: Increase in antimicrobial-resistant bacteria continues to be challenge to physicians. Particularly, multidrug-resistant (MDR) gram-negative bacilli (GNB), such as extended-spectrum beta-lactamase (ESBL)-producers and carbapenem-resistant pathogens, are becoming a major human health problem globally.Current Concepts: Gram-negative bacteria have developed resistance via mechanisms encoding AmpC beta-lactamases, ESBLs, and carbapenemases. The therapeutic options available for these pathogens are extremely limited. Infection by MDR bacteria is associated with ineffective antimicrobial therapy, which poses a major threat to the survival of patients with serious infections. Physicians should be familiar with the local epidemiology of MDR bacterial infections and the available therapeutic options. Carbapenems are considered as the drugs of choice for treating ESBL or AmpC-producers. However, increased use of carbapenems in response to an increased prevalence of MDR pathogens could be associated with the rapid emergence of carbapenem resistance. Therefore, there is an ongoing quest for carbapenem-sparing regimens for the treatment of MDR-GNB. Treatment of MDR-GNB infections need not be limited to carbapenems as novel antimicrobial agents are now available.Discussion and Conclusion: This comprehensive review aims to describe therapeutic options available for MDR-GNB infections in Korea, a country with a high prevalence of MDR pathogens. Recently developed antimicrobial agents that should be urgently introduced in Korea include ceftolozane-tazobactam, ceftazidime-avibactam, meropenem-vaborbactam, imipenem-relebactam, and cefiderocol. These drugs have been shown to be effective against carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales, carbapenem-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa, and Acinetobacter baumannii.

Pharmacodynamic evaluation of piperacillin/tazobactam versus meropenem against extended-spectrum β-lactamase-producing and non-producing Escherichia coli clinical isolates in a hollow-fibre infection model

BACKGROUND

Urosepsis caused by extended-spectrum β-lactamase (ESBL)-producing Escherichia coli is increasing worldwide. Carbapenems are commonly recommended for the treatment of ESBL infections; however, to minimize the emergence of carbapenem resistance, interest in alternative treatments has heightened.

OBJECTIVES

This study compared pharmacodynamics of piperacillin/tazobactam versus meropenem against ESBL-producing and non-producing E. coli clinical isolates.

METHODS

E. coli isolates, obtained from national reference laboratory in Bangladesh, were characterized by phenotypic tests, WGS, susceptibility tests and mutant frequency analysis. Three ESBL-producing and two non-producing E. coli were exposed to piperacillin/tazobactam (4.5 g, every 6 h and every 8 h, 30 min infusion) and meropenem (1 g, every 8 h, 30 min infusion) in a hollow-fibre infection model over 7 days.

RESULTS

Piperacillin/tazobactam regimens attained ∼4-5 log10 cfu/mL bacterial killing within 24 h and prevented resistance emergence over the experiment against ESBL-producing and non-producing E. coli. However, compared with 8 hourly meropenem, the 6 hourly piperacillin/tazobactam attained ∼1 log10 lower bacterial kill against one of three ESBL-producing E. coli (CTAP#173) but comparable killing for the other two ESBL-producing (CTAP#168 and CTAP#169) and two non-producing E. coli (CTAP#179 and CTAP#180). The 6 hourly piperacillin/tazobactam regimen attained ∼1 log10 greater bacterial kill compared with the 8 hourly regimen against CTAP#168 and CTAP#179 at 24 h.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study suggests piperacillin/tazobactam may be a potential alternative to carbapenems to treat urosepsis caused by ESBL-producing E. coli, although clinical trials with robust design are needed to confirm non-inferiority of outcome.

Pharmacodynamic evaluation of piperacillin/tazobactam against extended-spectrum β-lactamase-producing versus non-producing Escherichia coli in a hollow-fibre infection model

Extended-spectrum β-lactamase (ESBL)-producing Escherichia coli is a global public health concern. We evaluated the pharmacodynamic activity of piperacillin/tazobactam dosing regimens against ESBL-producing versus non-producing E. coli. E. coli clinical isolates were obtained from Bangladesh. Broth microdilution and WGS were performed on the 5 studied isolates. Three piperacillin/tazobactam susceptible ESBL-producing and two non-producing E. coli were exposed to piperacillin/tazobactam regimens (4.5 g, every 6 h and 4.5 g, every 8 h, as 30 min infusion) in a dynamic hollow-fibre infection model over 7 days. The extent of bacterial killing was ∼4-5 log₁₀ CFU/mL against ESBL-producing and non-producing E. coli with piperacillin/tazobactam, every 6 h and every 8 h regimens over the first 8 h. Bacterial killing was similar between two of three ESBL-producing (CTAP#168, CTAP169) and two non-ESBL-producing (CTAP#179, CTAP#180) E. coli over the experiment. ESBL-producing CTAP#173 E. coli was poorly killed (∼1 log) compared to two non-ESBL-producing E. coli over 168 h. WGS revealed, ESBL-producing E. coli isolates co-harboured multiple antibiotic resistance genes such as bla_CTX-M-15, bla_EC, bla_OXA-1, bla_TEM-1, aac(6')-Ib-cr5. Overall, piperacillin/tazobactam, every 6 h and every 8 h dosing regimens attained >3 log bacterial kill against all ESBL-producing or non-ESBL-producing E. coli within 24 h, maintained and prevented emergence of resistance over the end of experiment. To conclude, piperacillin/tazobactam standard regimens resulted in similar bacterial killing and prevented emergence of resistance against bla_CTX-M-15 type ESBL-producing and non-ESBL-producing E. coli clinical isolates.

Infectious Diseases Society of America 2022 Guidance on the Treatment of Extended-Spectrum β-lactamase Producing Enterobacterales (ESBL-E), Carbapenem-Resistant Enterobacterales (CRE), and Pseudomonas aeruginosa with Difficult-to-Treat Resistance (DTR-P. aeruginosa)

BACKGROUND

The Infectious Diseases Society of America (IDSA) is committed to providing up-to-date guidance on the treatment of antimicrobial-resistant infections. The initial guidance document on infections caused by extended-spectrum β-lactamase producing Enterobacterales (ESBL-E), carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales (CRE), and Pseudomonas aeruginosa with difficult-to-treat resistance (DTR-P. aeruginosa) was published on 17 September 2020. Over the past year, there have been a number of important publications furthering our understanding of the management of ESBL-E, CRE, and DTR-P. aeruginosa infections, prompting a rereview of the literature and this updated guidance document.

METHODS

A panel of 6 infectious diseases specialists with expertise in managing antimicrobial-resistant infections reviewed, updated, and expanded previously developed questions and recommendations about the treatment of ESBL-E, CRE, and DTR-P. aeruginosa infections. Because of differences in the epidemiology of resistance and availability of specific anti-infectives internationally, this document focuses on the treatment of infections in the United States.

RESULTS

Preferred and alternative treatment recommendations are provided with accompanying rationales, assuming the causative organism has been identified and antibiotic susceptibility results are known. Approaches to empiric treatment, duration of therapy, and other management considerations are also discussed briefly. Recommendations apply for both adult and pediatric populations.

CONCLUSIONS

The field of antimicrobial resistance is highly dynamic. Consultation with an infectious diseases specialist is recommended for the treatment of antimicrobial-resistant infections. This document is current as of 24 October 2021. The most current versions of IDSA documents, including dates of publication, are available at www.idsociety.org/practice-guideline/amr-guidance/.

Efficacy of Noncarbapenem β-Lactams Compared to Carbapenems for Extended-Spectrum β-Lactamase-Producing Enterobacterales Urinary Tract Infections

Background

Extended-spectrum β-lactamase (ESBL)-producing Enterobacterales are frequent causes of urinary tract infections (UTIs). Severe infections caused by ESBL Enterobacterales are often treated with carbapenems, but optimal treatment for less severe infections such as UTIs is unclear.

Methods

This retrospective cohort study included patients admitted to 4 hospitals in an academic healthcare system with an ESBL UTI treated with either a noncarbapenem β-lactam (NCBL) or a carbapenem for at least 48 hours from 1 April 2014 to 30 April 2018. Those who received an NCBL were compared to those receiving a carbapenem, with a primary outcome of hospital length of stay (LOS) and secondary outcomes of clinical and microbiological response, days until transition to oral therapy, rate of relapsed infection, and rate of secondary infections with a multidrug-resistant organism.

Results

Characteristics were similar among patients who received carbapenems (n = 321) and NCBLs (n = 171). There was no difference in LOS for the NCBL group compared to the carbapenem group (13 days vs 15 days, P = .66). The NCBL group had higher rates of microbiologic eradication (98% vs 92%, P = .002), shorter time to transition to oral therapy (5 days vs 9 days, P < .001), shorter overall durations of therapy (7 days vs 10 days, P < .001), and lower rates of relapsed infections (5% vs 42%, P = .0003).

Conclusions

Patients treated with NCBLs had similar LOS, higher rates of culture clearance, and shorter durations of antibiotic therapy compared to patients treated with carbapenems, suggesting that treatment for ESBL UTIs should not be selected solely based on phenotypic resistance.

Distribution and Antibiotic Susceptibility Pattern of Multidrug-Resistant Bacteria and Risk Factors Among Kidney Transplantation Recipients with Infections Over 13 Years: A Retrospective Study

Background

Infection ranks as the most common complication after kidney transplantation (KT) and threatens outcomes of kidney transplantation recipients (KTR). This study aimed to investigate the microbiological profile of infection, assess bacterial resistance and identify risk factors for multidrug-resistant (MDR) bacterial infection among KTR.

Methods

During the study period, 866 recipients underwent kidney transplant surgery. We studied the distribution of pathogens, resistance rate of MDR bacteria and the risk factors of MDR bacterial infection.

Results

Totally, 214 species of pathogens (110 species were MDR bacteria) were isolated in 119 KTR. Escherichia coli (E. coli) was the most common bacteria of the infection. MDR extended spectrum β-lactamase (ESBL)-producing Enterobacteriaceae (ESBL-E) were most resistant to ampicillin, cefazolin, ciprofloxacin and complex sulfamethoxazole, while quite sensitive to imipenem, amikacin and piperacillin/tazobactam (PIT). All MDR gram-positive bacteria were quite sensitive to linezolid and vancomycin, except that MDR Staphylococcus was also susceptible to rifampicin. Female gender (OR = 3.497, 95% CI = 1.445–8.467, P = 0.006), pathogen types > 1 (OR = 3.832, 95% CI = 1.429–10.273, P = 0.008) and postoperative time < 3 months (OR = 0.331, 95% CI = 0.137–0.799, P = 0.014) were independent risk factors for MDR bacterial infection.

Conclusion

PIT and amikacin may be an alternative choice of ESBL-E infection. Rifampicin can also be prescribed for MDR Staphylococcus infection. MDR bacterial infection was associated with female gender, pathogen types more than 1 and 3 months postoperative period.

The change of antibiotic susceptibility in febrile urinary tract infection in childhood and adolescence during the last decade

Purpose

The purpose of this study was to clarify the pattern of antibiotic resistance in pediatric urinary tract infections (UTIs).

Materials and Methods

We analyzed the data of entire urine culture tests and antibiotic susceptibility tests performed on hospitalized patients for febrile UTI at the Uijeongbu St. Mary’s Hospital during 2010–2020. A retrospective analysis was performed using medical records of urine culture results and antibiotic susceptibility results in patients with UTIs.

Results

We performed urine cultures from 2,491 patients, and identified bacterial types in 1,651 cases. We found that the resistance rates to ampicillin, ampicillin/sulbactam, cefazolin, gentamicin, piperacillin, tobramycin, and trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole were already over 20% in 2010. The resistance rates to many other antibiotics also steadily increased over time. Among the antibiotics tested in 2020, only amikacin, cefoxitin, imipenem, piperacillin/tazobactam, and tigecycline showed the resistance rates below 20%. Noticeably, ciprofloxacin also showed an increase in the resistance rate from 7.3% in 2010 (S 139 vs. R 11) to 27.78% in 2019 (S 104 vs. R 40) and even over 30% (33.96%) in 2020 (S 35 vs. R 18).

Conclusions

Antibiotic resistance is a serious problem in pediatric UTIs. In the treatment of pediatric UTIs, more caution is needed in the use of antibiotics. It may be necessary to apply appropriate antibiotic management programs such as antibiotics steward program for pediatric patients. Failure of a proper response strategy coping with antibiotic resistance may accelerate the resistance crisis.

Do weekly surveillance cultures contribute to antibiotic stewardship and correlate with outcome of HSCT in children - a multicentre real-world experience of 5 years from Indian subcontinent?

BACKGROUND

The utility of weekly rectal swab surveillance cultures (RSSC) as a resource to identify gut colonisation with Extended Spectrum Beta-Lactamase (ESBL)-producing E Coli or Klebsiella pneumoniae carbapenemase (KPC) producing organisms, to guide empirical antibiotic therapy in HSCT patients continues to be a subject of interest. There is urgency to assess and justify modifications to empirical antibiotics based upon regional epidemiology and patient groups.

OBJECTIVE

To study the utility of weekly rectal swab surveillance cultures (RSSC) to guide empirical antibiotics therapy and the impact of gut colonisation on transplant outcomes.

STUDY DESIGN

This is a retrospective analysis of 317 successive first transplants done in three pediatric bone marrow transplant centres in Indian sub-continent, mainly for hemoglobinopathies, between April 2016 and April 2021. Transplantation, infection control and febrile neutropenia management protocols are identical among the three centres. First line antibiotics were chosen based on RCCS reports i.e. meropenem and high dose meropenem with colistin for ESBL and carbapenemase resistant colonisation respectively for first half of the study and no adjustment was made in the second half. Clinical response to antibiotics, long term outcomes, antibiotic-resistant bacteraemia and acute GVHD were analysed. Log-rank test, Chi-squared test and Wilcoxon test were used to compare data using R Statistical software.

RESULTS

Of all 871 weekly RSSC done, 162 were positive for ESBL- or KPC-resistant organism. RCCS were ESBL-positive in 106 patients (33%) and KPC-positive in 10 patients (3%). Within 97 ESBL-positive patients for whom antimicrobial susceptibility testing (AST) report was available, only 22 (25%) demonstrated clinical resistance of Pip-Taz. Within the 10 KPC-positive patients' clinical resistance was observed only in 4 (40%) to Pip-Taz and 3 (30%) to meropenem. For ESBL-positive RSSC where 1st line empirical antibiotics were used, 66% of the patients responded clinically. Even within the 15 who were resistant to 1st line empirical antibiotics (Pip-Taz) on RSSC reports, 67% responded to Pip-Taz clinically. Within these patients 27 (56%) never needed any carbapenems. Using Pip-Taz empirically in ESBL-positive patients did not prolong meropenem use within 100 days of transplantation (p=0.18). For KPC-positive RSSC where 1st line empirical antibiotics were used, all patients clinically responded, including 4 who were resistant to Pip-Taz and 3 patients who were meropenem resistant on RCCS. Comparing patients who were ESBL-positive, KPC-positive and neither, no statistically significant difference was seen in overall survival (p=0.95), disease free survival (p=0.45), transplant related mortality (p=0.97), rejection (p=0.68) and rate of acute GVHD grade II-IV (p=0.78). Comparing the ESBL-positive patients who did and did not get higher-level empirical antibiotics, no statistical difference was seen in overall survival (p=0.32), disease free survival (p=0.64), transplant related mortality (p=0.65), rejection (p=0.46), acute GVHD grade II-IV (p=0.26) or antibiotic resistant bacteraemia (p=0.3).

CONCLUSIONS

In context of transplantation for non-malignant HSCTs, empiric antibiotic choice based on rectal swab surveillance cultures is not justified, even in regions with a high prevalence of antimicrobial resistance. Antimicrobial susceptibility testing (AST) reports in surveillance cultures did not correlate with in-vivo clinical response. Colonisation reported on weekly surveillance rectal swab cultures showed no correlation with clinical outcomes.

European Society of clinical microbiology and infectious diseases (ESCMID) guidelines for the treatment of infections caused by Multidrug-resistant Gram-negative bacilli (endorsed by ESICM -European Society of intensive care Medicine)

SCOPE

These ESCMID guidelines address the targeted antibiotic treatment of 3^rd generation cephalosporin-resistant Enterobacterales (3GCephRE) and carbapenem-resistant Gram-negative bacteria, focusing on the effectiveness of individual antibiotics and on combination vs. monotherapy.

METHODS

An expert panel was convened by ESCMID. A systematic review was performed including randomized controlled trials and observational studies, examining different antibiotic treatment regimens for the targeted treatment of infections caused by the 3GCephRE, carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales (CRE), carbapenem-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa (CRPA) and carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumanni (CRAB). Treatments were classified as head-to-head comparisons between individual antibiotics and monotherapy vs. combination therapy regimens, including defined monotherapy and combination regimens only. The primary outcome was all-cause mortality, preferably at 30 days and secondary outcomes included clinical failure, microbiological failure, development of resistance, relapse/recurrence, adverse events and length of hospital stay. The last search of all databases was conducted in December 2019, followed by a focused search for relevant studies up until ECCMID 2021. Data were summarized narratively. The certainty of the evidence for each comparison between antibiotics and between monotherapy vs. combination therapy regimens was classified by the GRADE recommendations. The strength of the recommendations for or against treatments was classified as strong or conditional (weak).

RECOMMENDATIONS

The guideline panel reviewed the evidence per pathogen, preferably per site of infection, critically appraising the existing studies. Many of the comparisons were addressed in small observational studies at high risk of bias only. Notably, there was very little evidence on the effects of the new, recently approved, beta-lactam beta-lactamase inhibitors on infections caused by carbapenem-resistant Gram-negative bacteria. Most recommendations are based on very-low and low certainty evidence. A high value was placed on antibiotic stewardship considerations in all recommendations, searching for carbapenem-sparing options for 3GCephRE and limiting the recommendations of the new antibiotics for severe infections, as defined by the sepsis-3 criteria. Research needs are addressed.

Klebsiella oxytoca Complex: Update on Taxonomy, Antimicrobial Resistance, and Virulence

Klebsiella oxytoca is actually a complex of nine species-Klebsiella grimontii, Klebsiella huaxiensis, Klebsiella michiganensis, K. oxytoca, Klebsiella pasteurii, Klebsiella spallanzanii, and three unnamed novel species. Phenotypic tests can assign isolates to the complex, but precise species identification requires genome-based analysis. The K. oxytoca complex is a human commensal but also an opportunistic pathogen causing various infections, such as antibiotic-associated hemorrhagic colitis (AAHC), urinary tract infection, and bacteremia, and has caused outbreaks. Production of the cytotoxins tilivalline and tilimycin lead to AAHC, while many virulence factors seen in Klebsiella pneumoniae, such as capsular polysaccharides and fimbriae, have been found in the complex; however, their association with pathogenicity remains unclear. Among the 5,724 K. oxytoca clinical isolates in the SENTRY surveillance system, the rates of nonsusceptibility to carbapenems, ceftriaxone, ciprofloxacin, colistin, and tigecycline were 1.8%, 12.5%, 7.1%, 0.8%, and 0.1%, respectively. Resistance to carbapenems is increasing alarmingly. In addition to the intrinsic bla_OXY, many genes encoding β-lactamases with varying spectra of hydrolysis, including extended-spectrum β-lactamases, such as a few CTX-M variants and several TEM and SHV variants, have been found. bla_KPC-2 is the most common carbapenemase gene found in the complex and is mainly seen on IncN or IncF plasmids. Due to the ability to acquire antimicrobial resistance and the carriage of multiple virulence genes, the K. oxytoca complex has the potential to become a major threat to human health.

The role of tazobactam-based combinations for the management of infections due to extended-spectrum β-lactamase-producing Enterobacterales: Insights from the Society of Infectious Diseases Pharmacists

Extended-spectrum β-lactamase (ESBL)-producing Enterobacterales are a global threat to public health due to their antimicrobial resistance profile and, consequently, their limited available treatment options. Tazobactam is a sulfone β-lactamase inhibitor with in vitro inhibitory activity against common ESBLs in Enterobacterales, including CTX-M. However, the role of tazobactam-based combinations in treating infections caused by ESBL-producing Enterobacterales remains unclear. In the United States, two tazobactam-based combinations are available, piperacillin-tazobactam and ceftolozane-tazobactam. We evaluated and compared the roles of tazobactam-based combinations against ESBL-producing organisms with emphasis on pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic exposures in relation to MIC distributions and established breakpoints, clinical outcomes data specific to infection site, and considerations for downstream effects with these agents regarding antimicrobial resistance development. While limited data with ceftolozane-tazobactam are encouraging for its potential role in infections due to ESBL-producing Enterobacterales, further evidence is needed to determine its place in therapy. Conversely, currently available microbiologic, pharmacokinetic, pharmacodynamic, and clinical data do not suggest a role for piperacillin-tazobactam, and we caution clinicians against its usage for these infections.

Non-carbapenem β-lactam/β-lactamase inhibitors versus carbapenems for urinary tract infections caused by extended-spectrum β-lactamase-producing Enterobacteriaceae: a systematic review

This systematic review was conducted to compare the efficacy of non-carbapenem β-lactam/β-lactamase inhibitors (BLBLIs) versus carbapenems for the treatment of urinary tract infections (UTIs) caused by extended-spectrum β-lactamase-producing Enterobacteriaceae (ESBL-PE). A comprehensive search of the Cochrane Library, PubMed and Embase was conducted from January 1979 to December 2020. Clinical success, microbiological success, clinical and microbiological success, and mortality were assessed as efficacy outcomes. Heterogeneity was assessed using the I² statistic, and a fixed-effects or random-effects model was applied for estimation of the risk ratio (RR). A total of 1612 patients from three randomised clinical trials (RCTs) and seven cohort studies were included in the meta-analysis. There was no statistically significant difference between BLBLIs and carbapenems in clinical success (RR = 0.99; P = 0.71), clinical and microbiological success (RR = 0.97; P = 0.46) and mortality (RR = 0.63; P = 0.22). A slightly higher rate of microbiological success was observed in BLBLI group (RR = 1.06; P = 0.01), which was mainly attributed to the efficacy of ceftazidime/avibactam based on a single RCT. BLBLIs were not inferior to carbapenems, with higher microbiological success, indicating an effective alternative non-carbapenem option for the treatment of UTIs caused by ESBL-PE. More high-quality and large-scale RCTs are required to further validate these findings. [Trial registration: PROSPERO ID: CRD42021233706].

An Evidence-Based Multidisciplinary Approach Focused at Creating Algorithms for Targeted Therapy of BSIs, cUTIs, and cIAIs Caused by Enterobacterales in Critically Ill Adult Patients

Prompt implementation of appropriate targeted antibiotic therapy represents a valuable approach in improving clinical and ecological outcome in critically septic patients. This multidisciplinary opinion article focused at developing evidence-based algorithms for targeted antibiotic therapy of bloodstream (BSIs), complicated urinary tract (cUTIs), and complicated intrabdominal infections (cIAIs) caused by Enterobacterales. The aim was to provide a guidance for intensive care physicians either in appropriately placing novel antibiotics or in considering strategies for sparing the broadest-spectrum antibiotics. A multidisciplinary team of experts (one intensive care physician, one infectious disease consultant, one clinical microbiologist and one MD clinical pharmacologist), performed several rounds of assessment to reach agreement in developing six different algorithms according to the susceptibility pattern (one each for multi-susceptible, extended-spectrum beta-lactamase-producing, AmpC beta-lactamase-producing, Klebsiella pneumoniae carbapenemase (KPC)-producing, OXA-48-producing, and Metallo-beta-lactamase (MBL)-producing Enterobacterales). Whenever multiple therapeutic options were feasible, a hierarchical scale was established. Recommendations on antibiotic dosing optimization were also provided. In order to retrieve evidence-based support for the therapeutic choices proposed in the algorithms, a comprehensive literature search was performed by a researcher on PubMed-MEDLINE from inception until March 2021. Quality and strength of evidence was established according to a hierarchical scale of the study design. Only articles published in English were included. It is expected that these algorithms, by allowing prompt revision of antibiotic regimens whenever feasible, appropriate place in therapy of novel beta-lactams, implementation of strategies for sparing the broadest-spectrum antibiotics, and pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic optimization of antibiotic dosing regimens, may be helpful either in improving clinical outcome or in containing the spread of antimicrobial resistance.

Piperacillin/tazobactam resistance in a clinical isolate of Escherichia coli due to IS26-mediated amplification of blaTEM-1B

A phenotype of Escherichia coli and Klebsiella pneumoniae, resistant to piperacillin/tazobactam (TZP) but susceptible to carbapenems and 3rd generation cephalosporins, has emerged. The resistance mechanism associated with this phenotype has been identified as hyperproduction of the β-lactamase TEM. However, the mechanism of hyperproduction due to gene amplification is not well understood. Here, we report a mechanism of gene amplification due to a translocatable unit (TU) excising from an IS26-flanked pseudo-compound transposon, PTn6762, which harbours blaTEM-1B. The TU re-inserts into the chromosome adjacent to IS26 and forms a tandem array of TUs, which increases the copy number of blaTEM-1B, leading to TEM-1B hyperproduction and TZP resistance. Despite a significant increase in blaTEM-1B copy number, the TZP-resistant isolate does not incur a fitness cost compared to the TZP-susceptible ancestor. This mechanism of amplification of blaTEM-1B is an important consideration when using genomic data to predict susceptibility to TZP.

Effectiveness of oral antibiotics for treating pyelonephritis caused by extended-spectrum beta-lactamase-producing Enterobacteriaceae: A case series

BACKGROUND

Recently, the spread of multidrug-resistant bacteria has become a global problem. Extended-spectrum beta-lactamase (ESBL)-producing Enterobacteriaceae (enterobacteria) is one example. The incidence of urinary tract infections caused by ESBL-producing enterobacteria has been increasing in some Japanese community settings. Currently, there is insufficient evidence on the effectiveness of oral antibiotics used for the treatment of pyelonephritis caused by ESBL-producing enterobacteria. We investigated the effectiveness of oral antibacterial agents against pyelonephritis caused by ESBL-producing Enterobacteriaceae.

METHODS

The records of patients who had been treated for pyelonephritis caused by ESBL-producing enterobacteria with oral antibiotics between April 1, 2014, and March 31, 2019, were reviewed retrospectively to assess the effectiveness of oral antibiotic treatment.

RESULTS

A total of seven cases were identified, including 1 patient with a positive blood culture and one patient with a Pitt bacteremia score of four points, indicating that the infections were severe. The antibiotics used to treat pyelonephritis were amoxicillin-clavulanic acid (n = 3), minocycline (n = 1), levofloxacin (n = 3), and sulfamethoxazole-trimethoprim with amoxicillin-clavulanic acid (n = 1). None of the patients had recurrence of pyelonephritis in the 60 days following oral antibiotic treatment, and there were no deaths during the 60-day follow-up period.

CONCLUSIONS

These antibiotics should be considered for oral treatment of pyelonephritis caused by ESBL-producing enterobacteria. However, as there is insufficient evidence available on the effectiveness of these antibiotics for the management of ESBL-producing enterobacterial infections, further large-scale prospective studies are needed.

Carbapenem-Sparing Strategies for ESBL Producers: When and How

Extended spectrum β-lactamase (ESBL)-producing bacteria are prevalent worldwide and correlated with hospital infections, but they have been evolving as an increasing cause of community acquired infections. The spread of ESBL constitutes a major threat for public health, and infections with ESBL-producing organisms have been associated with poor outcomes. Established therapeutic options for severe infections caused by ESBL-producing organisms are considered the carbapenems. However, under the pressure of carbapenem overuse and the emergence of resistance, carbapenem-sparing strategies have been implemented. The administration of carbapenem-sparing antibiotics for the treatment of ESBL infections has yielded conflicting results. Herein, the current available knowledge regarding carbapenem-sparing strategies for ESBL producers is reviewed, and the optimal conditions for the "when and how" of carbapenem-sparing agents is discussed. An important point of the review focuses on piperacillin-tazobactam as the agent arousing the most debate. The most available data regarding non-carbapenem β-lactams (i.e., ceftolozane-tazobactam, ceftazidime-avibactam, temocillin, cephamycins and cefepime) are also thoroughly presented as well as non β-lactams (i.e., aminoglycosides, quinolones, tigecycline, eravacycline and fosfomycin).