Impact of obesity on the evolution of outcomes in peritoneal dialysis patients

Patient screening and assessment for home dialysis therapies: A scoping review

BACKGROUND

Home dialysis therapies have limited uptake in most regions despite recognized benefits such as increasing patients' independence, and several domains of quality of life with cost savings in some systems.

OBJECTIVE

To perform a scoping review of published literature to identify tools and guides used in systematically screening and assessing patient suitability for home dialysis. A secondary objective was to explore barriers and enablers associated with the home dialysis assessment process. It is important to identify gaps in current research to pose pertinent questions for future work in the field.

DESIGN

Online databases Embase, Medline (Ovid), and CINAHL were used to identify articles published between January 2007 to May 2023. A total of 23 peer-reviewed primary and secondary studies that investigated screening or selection for patients > 18 years old with kidney failure for home dialysis met the study inclusion criteria.

RESULTS

The studies consisted of secondary studies (n = 10), observational studies (n = 8), and survey-based studies (n = 5). The major themes identified that influence patient screening and assessment for home dialysis candidacy included: screening tools and guidelines (n = 8), relative contraindications (n = 4), patient or program education (n = 9), and socioeconomic factors (n = 2).

LIMITATIONS

Consistent with the scoping review methodology, the methodological quality of included studies was not assessed. The possible omission of evidence in languages other than English is a limitation.

CONCLUSION

This scoping review identified tools and factors that potentially guide the assessment process for home dialysis candidacy. Patient screening and assessment for home dialysis requires a comprehensive evaluation of clinical, psychosocial, and logistical factors. Further research is required to validate and refine existing tools to establish standardized patient screening criteria and evaluation processes. Up-to-date training and education for healthcare providers and patients are needed to improve the utilization of home dialysis and ensure optimal outcomes.

The effect of body mass index on mortality, peritonitis, technique proficiency and residual renal function in peritoneal dialysis patients

BACKGROUND

The prevalence of obesity is increasing worldwide. Obesity is also increasing in the chronic kidney disease (CKD) population. There are conflicting data on complications such as mortality, peritonitis, and technique proficiency of peritoneal dialysis (PD) in underweight and obese patients according to body mass index (BMI). We aimed to present the data in our region to the literature by comparing the residual renal function (RRF), peritonitis, technique proficiency, and mortality rates of the patients we grouped according to BMI.

METHODS

The data of 404 patients who were started and followed up in our clinic between March 2005 and November 2021 were evaluated retrospectively. They were grouped as underweight, normal weight, overweight, and obese according to BMI. RRF, mortality, technique proficiency and peritonitis data of the groups were compared.

RESULTS

Of the 404 patients, 44 were underweight, 199 were normal weight, 110 were overweight, and 55 were obese. No difference was found between the groups in the technique survey and in the time to first peritonitis with Kaplan-Meier analysis (respectively; p = 0.610, p = 0.445). Multivariate Cox regression analysis showed that BMI did not affect mortality (HR 1.196 [95% CI 0.722-1.981] (p = 0.488)).

CONCLUSION

In conclusion, we report that BMI has no effect on RRF, peritonitis, technique proficiency, and mortality in patients undergoing PD, and that mortality may depend on additional factors such as mean albumin, time to first peritonitis, and loss of RRF.

Physical activity and exercise in peritoneal dialysis: International Society for Peritoneal Dialysis and the Global Renal Exercise Network practice recommendations

Life participation requiring physical activity and physical function is a key patient-reported outcome for people receiving peritoneal dialysis (PD). Clinician guidance is required from multidisciplinary sources regarding exercise and activity advice to address the specific needs of this group. From August 2020 through to June 2021, the Global Renal Exercise Network and the International Society for Peritoneal Dialysis reviewed the published literature and international clinical experience to develop a set of clinical practice points. A set of questions relevant to physical activity and exercise were developed from the perspective of a person receiving PD and were the basis for the practice point development. The GRADE framework was used to evaluate the quality of evidence and to guide clinical practice points. The review of the literature found sparse quality evidence, and thus the clinical practice points are generally based on the expert consensus of people receiving PD, PD exercise expert clinicians and experienced PD exercise researchers. Clinical practice points address timing of exercise and activity (post-catheter insertion, peritoneal space empty or full), the uptake of specific activities (work, sex, swimming, core exercise), potential adverse outcomes related to activity and exercise (exit site care, perspiration, cardiovascular compromise, fatigue, intra-abdominal pressure), the effect of exercise and activity on conditions of interest (mental health, obesity, frailty, low fitness) and exercise nutrition.

Dialysis of the Obese Patient: Meeting Needs for a Growing Epidemic

Increasing population obesity and associated metabolic consequences has led to increased number of obese patients with chronic kidney disease and end-stage renal disease. While obesity is associated with increased cardiovascular morbidity and mortality, obese dialysis patients present a seeming paradox for survival benefit, given other acute intervening illnesses for those on dialysis with loss of lean body mass overtime. Challenges remain in providing adequate renal replacement options and therapy for this growing segment of obese patients on dialysis which are discussed in this article.