Immune checkpoint inhibitor use in patients with end-stage kidney disease: an analysis of reported cases and literature review

How to deal with renal toxicities from immune-based combination treatments in metastatic renal cell carcinoma. A nephrological consultation for Oncologists

We are witnessing a revolution in the treatment of metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC). Indeed, several immune-based combinations (ICI [immune checkpoint inhibitor] + ICI, or ICI + antiangiogenic agents) have been approved as first-line therapy for mRCC after demonstrating superior efficacy over the previous standard. Despite all the improvements made, safety remains a critical issue, adverse events (AEs) being the main reason for drug discontinuations or dose reductions, ultimately resulting in an increased risk of losing efficacy. Thus, a good understanding of the AEs associated with the use of immune-based combinations, their prevention, and management, are key in order to maximize therapeutic effectiveness. Among these AEs, renal ones are relatively frequent, but always difficult to be diagnosed, not to take into account that it is often difficult to determine which drug is to blame for such toxicities. Chronic kidney disease (CKD) is a common finding in patients with RCC, either as a pre-existing condition and/or as a consequence of cancer and its treatment; furthermore, CKD, especially in advanced stages and in patients undergoing dialysis, may influence the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics properties of anticancer agents. Finally, managing cancer therapy in kidney transplanted patients is another challenge. In this review, we discuss the therapy management of immune-based combinations in patients with CKD, on dialysis, or transplanted, as well as their renal toxicities, with a focus on their prevention, detection and practical management, taking into account the crucial role of the consulting nephrologist within the multidisciplinary care of these patients.

A case of complete response to avelumab plus axitinib combination therapy for metastatic clear cell renal cell carcinoma in a kidney undergoing dialysis

Introduction

Combination therapies of immune checkpoint and tyrosine kinase inhibitors for end-stage kidney disease and patients on hemodialysis need careful consideration as few case reports provide suitable management decisions.

Case presentation

A 70-year-old man who had undergone hemodialysis for 6 years due to nephrosclerosis. Avelumab plus axitinib combination therapy was performed for repeated lung metastasis, and a complete response was achieved without major side effects.

Conclusion

A complete response was achieved after Ave plus Axi combination therapy for clear cell renal cell carcinoma in a patient undergoing dialysis. This suggests that Ave plus Axi combination therapy may be safe and effective for dialysis patients.

Maintenance avelumab therapy for urothelial carcinoma in a hemodialysis patient: a case report

In recent years, immune checkpoint inhibitors have attracted attention in treatment for urothelial carcinoma. However, many clinical trials included only patients who had adequate renal function. The efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors for hemodialysis patients had not been well-documented. Herein, we report a case of a 73-years-old male with metastatic urothelial carcinoma. He was on maintenance hemodialysis, because he underwent total urinary tract resection for treatment of the urothelial carcinoma in his sixties. He was introduced to our hospital with metastases of lung and pubic bone, and was treated with chemotherapy including gemcitabine and paclitaxel. After two cycles, although his metastases decreased in size, he experienced severe anemia, diarrhea, and duodenitis. Therefore, he transitioned to maintenance therapy with avelumab earlier than initially planned. The treatment achieved 10 months disease control, without significant adverse events. To our best knowledge, this is the first case in which avelumab maintenance therapy achieved disease control of metastatic urothelial carcinoma in a hemodialysis patient.

Immunotherapy in oncology and the kidneys: a clinical review of the evaluation and management of kidney immune-related adverse events

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) are now widely used in the treatment of many cancers, and currently represent the standard of care for multiple malignancies. These agents enhance the T cell immune response to target cancer tissues, and have demonstrated considerable benefits for cancer outcomes. However, despite these improved outcomes, there are important kidney immune-related adverse events (iRAEs) associated with ICI. Acute tubulo-interstitial nephritis remains the most frequent kidney iRAE, however glomerular lesions and electrolytes disturbances are increasingly being recognized and reported. In this review, we summarize clinical features and identify risk factors for kidney iRAEs, and discuss the current understanding of pathophysiologic mechanisms. We highlight the evidence basis for guideline-recommended management of ICI-related kidney injury as well as gaps in current knowledge. We advocate for judicious use of kidney biopsy to identify ICI-associated kidney injury, and early use of corticosteroid treatment where appropriate. Selected patients may also be candidates for re-challenge with ICI therapy after a kidney iRAE, in view of current data on recurrent rates of kidney injury. Risk of benefits of re-challenge must be considered on an individual considering patient preferences and prognosis. Lastly, we review current knowledge of ICI use in the setting of patients with end-stage kidney disease, including kidney transplant recipients and those receiving dialysis, which suggest that these patients should not be summarily excluded from the potential benefits of these cancer therapies.

Society for Immunotherapy of Cancer (SITC) clinical practice guideline on immunotherapy for the treatment of gynecologic cancer

Advanced gynecologic cancers have historically lacked effective treatment options. Recently, immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have been approved by the US Food and Drug Administration for the treatment of cervical cancer and endometrial cancer, offering durable responses for some patients. In addition, many immunotherapy strategies are under investigation for the treatment of earlier stages of disease or in other gynecologic cancers, such as ovarian cancer and rare gynecologic tumors. While the integration of ICIs into the standard of care has improved outcomes for patients, their use requires a nuanced understanding of biomarker testing, treatment selection, patient selection, response evaluation and surveillance, and patient quality of life considerations, among other topics. To address this need for guidance, the Society for Immunotherapy of Cancer (SITC) convened a multidisciplinary panel of experts to develop a clinical practice guideline. The Expert Panel drew on the published literature as well as their own clinical experience to develop evidence- and consensus-based recommendations to provide guidance to cancer care professionals treating patients with gynecologic cancer.

Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor-Associated AKI: Debates in Diagnosis, Management, and Rechallenge

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) are now established treatments for advanced cancer and their use is now ubiquitous. The high upside of ICIs is tempered by their toxicity profile affecting almost every organ, including the kidneys. Although acute interstitial nephritis is the major kidney-related adverse effect of checkpoint inhibitors, other manifestations such as electrolyte abnormalities and renal tubular acidosis have been described. With increasing awareness and recognition of these events, the focus has shifted to non-invasive identification of ICI-acute interstitial nephritis, with sophisticated approaches involving biomarkers and immunologic signatures being studied. Although the management of immune-related adverse events with corticosteroids is straightforward, there now are more data to help guide immunosuppressive regimens, ICI rechallenge, and delineate risk and efficacy in special populations such as individuals on dialysis or those who have received a transplant.

Severe hematuria in a patient receiving bevacizumab and pembrolizumab for metastatic cervical cancer: a case report

BACKGROUND

Bevacizumab is a monoclonal antibody drug targeting Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor (VEGF), which binds to VEGF receptors to inhibit vascular endothelial cell proliferation and angiogenesis, thus inhibiting tumorigenesis. Pembrolizumab is a monoclonal antibody that can bind to the programmed death-1 (PD-1) receptor, which can block the binding of the PD-1 receptor to its ligands PD-L1 and PD-L2, and release PD-1 pathway-mediated suppression of immune responses. By blocking the activity of PD-1, the purpose of inhibiting tumor growth is achieved.

CASE PRESENTATION

We report a severe hematuria of bevacizumab plus pembrolizumab, in a 58-year-old woman with metastatic cervical cancer. After three cycles every three weeks of consolidation chemotherapy (carboplatin, paclitaxel, bevacizumab) and following three cycles consolidation chemotherapy (carboplatin, paclitaxel, bevacizumab, pembrolizumab), the patient presented a worsening state. Manifested as massive gross hematuria with blood clots. After stopping chemotherapy, cefoxitin, tranexamic acid and hemocoagulase atrox therapy was administered resulting in rapid clinical improvement. The patient was a cervical cancer with bladder metastasis that increases the risk of development of hematuria. Inhibition of VEGF, which has anti-apoptotic, anti-inflammatory, and pro-survival influences on endothelial cells, weakens their regenerative capacity and increases expression of proinflammatory genes leading to weakened supporting layers of blood vessels and, hence, to damaged vascular integrity. In our patient, the development of hematuria may result from the anti-VEGF effect of bevacizumab. In addition, pembrolizumab may also cause bleeding, and the mechanism of bleeding caused by pembrolizumab is currently unclear, which may be related to immune mediation.

CONCLUSION

To our knowledge, this is the first case reporting on the development of severe hematuria during bevacizumab plus pembrolizumab treatment, which should alert the clinicians in case of bleeding adverse events onset in older patients under bevacizumab plus pembrolizumab therapy.

Onconephrology 2022: An Update

Onconephrology is an upcoming and expanding subspecialty that deals with the intersections between hematology/oncology and nephrology. With the paradigm shift in the understanding of cancer immunobiology and mechanisms of oncotherapeutic drug toxicities, it is important for a nephrologist to have a sound understanding of this field. Over the last 5 years, there have been immense developments in our understanding of kidney-related adverse events from various targeted, immuno- and cellular-based therapies. Pathogenic mechanisms of electrolyte imbalance, hypertension (oncohypertension), and AKI from multiple forms of cancer therapies have been explored. Significant research has also been conducted in the field of transplant onconephrology. In this review, we have tried to assimilate the most recent updates in the last 2 years in this ever-growing and fascinating field.

Two cases of nivolumab plus ipilimumab therapy for dialysis patients with advanced bone metastasis from renal cell carcinoma

Nivolumab and ipilimumab are immune checkpoint inhibitors. Combination therapy with these two drugs has been shown to improve the outcome of advanced renal cell carcinoma. However, data about the safety and the efficacy of combination therapy with these two drugs in hemodialysis patients are small. A 59-year-old male hemodialysis patient presented with bone metastasis from renal cell carcinoma, which was located at the right femur. He received nivolumab plus ipilimumab therapy. At 7 months after treatment, he was diagnosed with diabetes as an immune-related adverse event. He was managed with insulin therapy. At 11 months after treatment, CT revealed cytoreduction of metastasis. A 74-year-old male hemodialysis patient presented with bone metastasis of renal cell carcinoma located at the sacrum and left scapula. He received nivolumab plus ipilimumab therapy. At 6 months after treatment, CT showed no progression of metastasis. Nivolumab and ipilimumab therapy might be a viable treatment for hemodialysis patients with bone metastasis from renal cell carcinoma. However, close attention should be paid immune-related adverse events in such patients.

Hodgkin Lymphoma on Hemodialysis: A Review of Treatment and Recommendations

Chemotherapy for classic Hodgkin lymphoma (cHL) patients on hemodialysis (HD) is an extremely challenging situation because pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic studies of most chemotherapeutics are lacking for the HD patient, and the small amount of evidence available comes mostly from case reports and small case series. In this review, we provide recommendations based on treatment experience of cHL patients on HD in the literature. HD patients undergoing chemotherapy are at risk of overdose and toxicities because many drugs are significantly eliminated by the kidneys, and at the same time, are at risk of undertreatment because many drugs are removed by HD. Therefore, dose modifications and timing of drug administration in relation to HD sessions must be carefully planned according to the distinct traits of each chemotherapeutic. We carried out an exhaustive literature review of reports of actual administrations of chemotherapeutics to cHL on HD, and also extrapolated data from reports of the same chemotherapeutics that were administered to HD patients with malignancies other than cHL. We summarized the information found in the literature, and provide practical and balanced recommendations concerning dose modifications and optimal timing of drug administration in relation to HD sessions for each chemotherapeutic. Chemotherapy regimens and individual chemotherapeutics studied in this review include ABVD (doxorubicin + bleomycin + vinblastine + dacarbazine), BEACOPP (bleomycin + etoposide + doxorubicin + cyclophosphamide + vincristine + procarbazine + prednisolone), MOPP (mechlorethamine + vincristine + procarbazine + prednisolone), gemcitabine, vinorelbine, brentuximab vedotin, and PD-1 inhibitors (nivolumab and pembrolizumab).

Cancer Risk and Mortality in Patients With Kidney Disease: A Population-Based Cohort Study

RATIONALE & OBJECTIVE

Patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) may be at increased risk for cancer. CKD may also be associated with worse cancer outcomes. This study examined cancer incidence and mortality across the spectrum of CKD.

STUDY DESIGN

Population-based cohort study.

SETTING & PARTICIPANTS

All adult Ontario residents with data on estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) or who were receiving maintenance dialysis or had received a kidney transplant (2007-2016).

EXPOSURE

Patients were categorized as of the first date they had 2 eGFR assessments or were registered as receiving maintenance dialysis or having received a kidney transplant. eGFR levels were further categorized as ≥60, 45-59, 30-44, 15-29, and <15 mL/min/1.73 m²; the latter 4 groups are consistent with KDIGO (Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes) CKD categories G3a, G3b, G4, and G5, respectively.

OUTCOMES

Overall and site-specific cancer incidence and mortality.

ANALYTICAL APPROACH

Fine and Gray subdistribution hazard models.

RESULTS

Among 5,882,388 individuals with eGFR data, 29,809 receiving dialysis, and 4,951 having received a kidney transplant, there were 325,895 cancer diagnoses made during 29,993,847 person-years of follow-up. The cumulative incidence of cancer ranged between 10.8% and 15.3% in patients with kidney disease. Compared with patients with eGFR ≥60 mL/min/1.73 m², adjusted hazard ratios (AHRs) for a cancer diagnosis among patients with CKD G3a, G3b, G4, and G5 were 1.08 (95% CI, 1.07-1.10), 0.99 (95% CI, 0.97-1.01), 0.85 (95% CI, 0.81-0.88), and 0.81 (95% CI, 0.73-0.90), respectively. The AHRs for patients receiving dialysis and who had received a transplant were 1.01 (95% CI, 0.96-1.07) and 1.25 (95% CI, 1.12-1.39), respectively. Patients with kidney disease had higher proportions of stage 4 cancers at diagnosis. Patients with CKD G3a, G3b, and G4 and transplant recipients had increased risks of cancer-specific mortality (AHRs of 1.27 [95% CI, 1.23-1.32], 1.29 [95% CI, 1.24-1.35], 1.25 [95% CI, 1.18-1.33], and 1.48 [95% CI, 1.18-1.87], respectively). The risks of bladder and kidney cancers and multiple myeloma were particularly increased in CKD, and mortality from these malignancies increased with worsening kidney function.

LIMITATIONS

Possible unmeasured confounding and limited ability to infer causal associations.

CONCLUSIONS

Cancer incidence in the setting of kidney disease is substantial. Cancer risk was increased in mild to moderate CKD and among transplant recipients, but not in advanced kidney disease. Cancer-related mortality was significantly higher among patients with kidney disease, particularly urologic cancers and myeloma. Strategies to detect and manage these cancers in the CKD population are needed.

Diagnosis and management of immune checkpoint inhibitor-associated acute kidney injury

Since their introduction into clinical practice a decade ago, immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have had an overwhelming impact on cancer treatment. Use of these agents in oncology continues to grow; however, the increased use of these agents has been associated with a parallel increase in ICI-associated immune-related adverse events, which can affect virtually any organ, including the kidneys. ICI-associated acute kidney injury (ICI-AKI) occurs in 2-5% of patients treated with ICIs. Its occurrence can have important consequences, including the temporary or permanent discontinuation of ICIs or other concomitant anticancer therapies and the need for prolonged treatment with corticosteroids. Various mechanisms have been proposed to underlie the development of ICI-AKI, including loss of tolerance to self-antigens, reactivation of drug-specific effector T cells, and the production of kidney-specific autoantibodies. ICI-AKI most commonly manifests as acute tubulo-interstitial nephritis on kidney biopsy and generally shows a favourable response to early initiation of corticosteroids, with complete or partial remission achieved in most patients. The evaluation of patients with suspected ICI-AKI requires careful diagnostic work-up and kidney biopsy for patients with moderate-to-severe ICI-AKI to ensure accurate diagnosis and inform appropriate treatment.

Immunotherapies and Renal Injury

Cancer immunotherapy represents a giant leap forward in the management of malignant diseases. An optimal anti-tumor immune response requires cancer antigen recognition by T-cells followed by an effector immune response. Suppression of T-cell activation prevents cancer cell clearance resulting in tumor proliferation. Recent clinical successes of immune checkpoint inhibitors and chimeric antigen receptor T cell therapies has transformed the landscape of cancer immunotherapy. The goal of immunotherapy is to boost host-protective anti-tumor immunity without concomitantly causing immune-related adverse events. However, immunotherapies can cause multiorgan dysfunction including acute kidney injury. Prompt recognition and management of immunotherapy-associated kidney injury is critical in preserving kidney function and improving patient outcomes.

Case Report: Safety and Efficacy of Enfortumab Vedotin in a Patient With Metastatic Urothelial Carcinoma Undergoing Peritoneal Dialysis

The clinical management of metastatic urothelial carcinoma has significantly evolved with the emergence of monoclonal antibodies and antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs). Enfortumab vedotin (EV) was granted approval by the FDA in 2021 for patients with locally advanced or metastatic urothelial carcinoma who have received prior immunotherapy and platinum-containing chemotherapy. Little to no data exist for the use of EV in patients with concurrent end-stage renal disease (ESRD) using either hemodialysis or peritoneal dialysis (PD). Here, we present the case of a patient with metastatic urothelial carcinoma on PD who failed multiple lines of treatment but demonstrated an impressive response to EV without significant toxicity. We discuss the possible impact of peritoneal dialysis on the pharmacokinetics of ADCs and the potential for safe administration based on known pharmacokinetic data.

Immunotherapy and the Spectrum of Kidney Disease: Should We Individualize the Treatment?

The new targeted cancer therapies including immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have been demonstrated to improve the survival of oncological patients, even in cases of metastatic cancer. In the past 5 years, several studies have revealed that ICI can produce several immune-mediated toxicities involving different organs, such as the skin, the gastrointestinal tract, the liver, and, of course, the kidney. The most frequent lesion of immunotoxicity in the kidney is acute interstitial nephritis (AIN), although other nephropathies have also been described as a consequence of the use of ICI, such as glomerulonephritis and acute thrombotic microangiopathy, among others. In addition, kidney rejection has also been reported in kidney transplant patients treated with ICI. Normally randomized clinical trials with ICI exclude patients with end-stage kidney disease, namely, patients undergoing dialysis and kidney transplant patients. Several important questions need to be addressed in relation to immunotherapy and patients with kidney disease: (a) when to start corticosteroid therapy in a patient with suspected acute kidney injury (AKI) related to ICI, (b) the moment of nephrologist referral and kidney biopsy indication, (c) management of ICI in patients undergoing dialysis, and (d) the effect of ICI in kidney transplantation, immunosuppressive personalized treatment, and risk of allograft rejection in kidney transplant patients. The objective of this review was to summarize the recently published literature on a wide spectrum of kidney disease patients with cancer and ICI. This review will address three main important groups of individuals with kidney disease and cancer immunotherapy, AKI associated with ICI, patients undergoing dialysis, and kidney transplant recipients. We believe that the information provided in this review will enlighten the personalized ICI treatment in individuals with a broader spectrum of kidney diseases.

Cancer Drug Dosing in Chronic Kidney Disease and Dialysis

Patients with malignancies have a high prevalence of kidney disease and are often treated with antineoplastic agents that undergo kidney metabolism or excretion or clearance via renal replacement therapies. Thus, the dosing of these agents, including classic chemotherapeutic drugs, targeted therapies, and immunotherapy, must take into account patients' kidney function. In this review, we will discuss the pitfalls of accurate measurement of kidney function and how kidney disease affects both pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic properties of drugs. Lastly, we will discuss specific agents and summarize current dosing strategies for use in patients with chronic kidney disease and end-stage kidney disease.

Transplant Onconephrology in Patients With Kidney Transplants

Cancer is a leading cause of death in patients with kidney transplantation. Patients with kidney transplants are 10- to 200-times more likely to develop cancers after transplant than the general population, depending on the cancer type. Recent advances in cancer therapies have dramatically improved survival outcomes; however, patients with kidney transplants face unique challenges of immunosuppression management, cancer screening, and recurrence of cancer after transplant. Patients with a history of cancer tend to be excluded from transplant candidacy or are required to have long cancer-free wait time before wait-listing. The strategy of pretransplant wait time management may need to be revisited as cancer therapies improve, which is most applicable to patients with a history of multiple myeloma. In this review, we discuss several important topics in transplant onconephrology: the current recommendations for pretransplant wait times for transplant candidates with cancer histories, cancer screening post-transplant, post-transplant lymphoproliferative disorder, strategies for transplant patients with a history of multiple myeloma, and novel therapies for patients with post-transplant malignancies. With emerging novel cancer treatments, it is critical to have multidisciplinary discussions involving patients, caregivers, transplant nephrologists, and oncologists to achieve patient-oriented goals.

Cemiplimab for Locally Advanced Cutaneous Squamous Cell Carcinoma: A Case Series of 3 Unique Scenarios

Cemiplimab, a monoclonal antibody directed against programmed death receptor 1 (PD-1), has shown promising results in cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma (cSCC). In a nonrandomized trial where cemiplimab 3 mg/kg was given every 2 weeks for up to 96 weeks, a 44% response rate was noted. This case series discusses 3 unique scenarios of patients with advanced cSCC treated with cemiplimab. The first case is of an end stage kidney disease (ESKD) patient with failed living donor kidney transplant who had developed recurrent cSCC despite several excisions and topical 5-flurouracil and acitretin therapy. He received 8 cycles of cemiplimab leading to resolution. This case serves as an example of the safety and efficacy of cemiplimab in a complex patient who is a kidney transplant recipient on hemodialysis. The second case describes an elderly gentleman with inoperable cSCC initially treated with radiotherapy who later received 9 cycles of cemiplimab for recurrent metastatic disease with excellent response. This case supports the safe and effective use of cemiplimab in an elderly patient. In the third case, cSCC presented itself as a large fungating mass that would have otherwise necessitated limb amputation and was successfully treated with 18 cycles of cemiplimab. This case highlights the dramatic response to cemiplimab obviating the need for surgical intervention and resulting in limb salvage.

OUP accepted manuscript

Cancer is the second leading cause of death in people with chronic kidney disease (CKD) after cardiovascular disease. The incidence of CKD in patients with cancer is higher than in the non-cancer population. Across various populations, CKD is associated with an elevated risk of cancer incidence and cancer death compared with people without CKD, although the risks are cancer site-specific. Higher risk of cancer is detectable in mild CKD [estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) 60-89 mL/min/1.73 m2], although this risk is more obvious if sensitive markers of kidney disease are used, such as cystatin C. Independent of eGFR, albuminuria is associated with increased risk of site-specific cancer incidence and death. Here, we explore the potential mechanisms for the increased risk of cancer observed in CKD, including patient factors (shared risks such as cardiometabolic disease, obesity, smoking, diet, lifestyle and environment), disease (genetic, inflammatory and infective) and treatment factors. In particular, we discuss the ways in which renal adverse events associated with conventional chemotherapies and newer systemic anti-cancer therapies (including targeted and immunotherapies) may contribute to worse cancer outcomes in people with CKD. Finally, we review the potential benefits of acknowledging increased risk of cancer in risk prediction tools used for the management of CKD.

Renal Cell Cancer and Chronic Kidney Disease

The association between chronic kidney disease (CKD) and renal cell carcinoma (RCC) is bidirectional and multifactorial. Risk factors such as hypertension, diabetes mellitus, obesity, and smoking increase the risk of both CKD and RCC. CKD can lead to RCC via an underlying cystic disease or oxidative stress. RCC can cause CKD because of the tumor itself, surgical reduction of renal mass (either partial or radical nephrectomy), and perioperative acute kidney injury. Medical therapies such as immune checkpoint inhibitors and vascular endothelial growth factor inhibitors can lead to acute kidney injury and resultant CKD. Clinicians need to be aware of the complex, bidirectional interplay between both diseases.