1
|
Sandberg M, Cohen A, Escott M, Temple D, Marie-Costa C, Rodriguez R, Gordon A, Rong A, Andres-Robusto B, Roebuck EH, Whitman W, Webb CJ, Stratta RJ, Assimos D, Wood K, Mirzazadeh M. Bladder Stones in Renal Transplant Patients: Presentation, Management, and Follow-up. Urol Int 2024:1-7. [PMID: 38684150 DOI: 10.1159/000539091] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/17/2024] [Accepted: 04/24/2024] [Indexed: 05/02/2024]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION The study aim was to analyze the presentation, management, and follow-up of renal transplant patients developing bladder calculi. METHODS Patients who underwent renal transplant with postoperative follow-up at our institution were retrospectively analyzed (1984-2023) to assess for the development of posttransplant bladder stones. All bladder stones were identified by computerized tomography imaging and stone size was measured using this imaging modality. RESULTS The prevalence of bladder calculi post-renal transplantation during the study window was 0.22% (N = 20/8,835) with a median time to bladder stone diagnosis of 13 years posttransplant. Of all bladder stone patients, 6 (30%) received deceased donor and 14 (70%) living donor transplants. There were 11 patients with known bladder stone composition available; the most common being calcium oxalate (N = 6). Eleven (55%) patients had clinical signs or symptoms (most commonly microhematuria). Fourteen of the bladder stone cohort patients (70%) underwent treatment including cystolitholapaxy in 12 subjects. Of these 14 patients, 9 (64%) were found to have nonabsorbable suture used for their ureteroneocystostomy closure. CONCLUSIONS The prevalence of bladder stones post-renal transplant is low. The utilization of nonabsorbable suture for ureteral implantation was the main risk factor identified in our series. This technique is no longer used at our institution. Other factors contributing to bladder stone formation in this population warrant identification.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maxwell Sandberg
- Department of Urology, Atrium Health Wake Forest Baptist Medical Center, Winston Salem, North Carolina, USA
| | - Adam Cohen
- Department of Urology, Atrium Health Wake Forest Baptist Medical Center, Winston Salem, North Carolina, USA
| | - Megan Escott
- Department of Urology, Atrium Health Wake Forest Baptist Medical Center, Winston Salem, North Carolina, USA
| | - Davis Temple
- Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston Salem, North Carolina, USA
| | - Claudia Marie-Costa
- Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston Salem, North Carolina, USA
| | - Rainer Rodriguez
- Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston Salem, North Carolina, USA
| | - Alex Gordon
- Edward Via College of Osteopathic Medicine, Blacksburg, Virginia, USA
| | - Anita Rong
- Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston Salem, North Carolina, USA
| | | | - Emily H Roebuck
- Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston Salem, North Carolina, USA
| | - Wyatt Whitman
- Department of Urology, Atrium Health Wake Forest Baptist Medical Center, Winston Salem, North Carolina, USA
| | - Christopher J Webb
- Section of Transplantation, Department of Surgery, Atrium Health Wake Forest Baptist Medical Center, Winston Salem, North Carolina, USA
| | - Robert J Stratta
- Section of Transplantation, Department of Surgery, Atrium Health Wake Forest Baptist Medical Center, Winston Salem, North Carolina, USA
| | - Dean Assimos
- Department of Urology, Atrium Health Wake Forest Baptist Medical Center, Winston Salem, North Carolina, USA
- Department of Urology, University of Alabama Birmingham Medical Center, Birmingham, Alabama, USA
| | - Kyle Wood
- Department of Urology, University of Alabama Birmingham Medical Center, Birmingham, Alabama, USA
| | - Maajid Mirzazadeh
- Department of Urology, Atrium Health Wake Forest Baptist Medical Center, Winston Salem, North Carolina, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Kanbay M, Copur S, Bakir CN, Hatipoglu A, Sinha S, Haarhaus M. Management of de novo nephrolithiasis after kidney transplantation: a comprehensive review from the European Renal Association CKD-MBD working group. Clin Kidney J 2024; 17:sfae023. [PMID: 38410685 PMCID: PMC10896178 DOI: 10.1093/ckj/sfae023] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/31/2023] [Indexed: 02/28/2024] Open
Abstract
The lifetime incidence of kidney stones is 6%-12% in the general population. Nephrolithiasis is a known cause of acute and chronic kidney injury, mediated via obstructive uropathy or crystal-induced nephropathy, and several modifiable and non-modifiable genetic and lifestyle causes have been described. Evidence for epidemiology and management of nephrolithiasis after kidney transplantation is limited by a low number of publications, small study sizes and short observational periods. Denervation of the kidney and ureter graft greatly reduces symptomatology of kidney stones in transplant recipients, which may contribute to a considerable underdiagnosis. Thus, reported prevalence rates of 1%-2% after kidney transplantation and the lack of adverse effects on allograft function and survival should be interpreted with caution. In this narrative review we summarize current state-of-the-art knowledge regarding epidemiology, clinical presentation, diagnosis, prevention and therapy of nephrolithiasis after kidney transplantation, including management of asymptomatic stone disease in kidney donors. Our aim is to strengthen clinical nephrologists who treat kidney transplant recipients in informed decision-making regarding management of kidney stones. Available evidence, supporting both surgical and medical treatment and prevention of kidney stones, is presented and critically discussed. The specific anatomy of the transplanted kidney and urinary tract requires deviation from established interventional approaches for nephrolithiasis in native kidneys. Also, pharmacological and lifestyle changes may need adaptation to the specific situation of kidney transplant recipients. Finally, we point out current knowledge gaps and the need for additional evidence from future studies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mehmet Kanbay
- Department of Medicine, Nephrology, Koc University School of Medicine, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Sidar Copur
- Department of Medicine, Koc University School of Medicine, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Cicek N Bakir
- Department of Medicine, Koc University School of Medicine, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Alper Hatipoglu
- Department of Medicine, Koc University School of Medicine, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Smeeta Sinha
- Department of Renal Medicine, Salford Royal NHS Institute, Northern Care Alliance NHS Foundation Trust, Salford, UK
| | - Mathias Haarhaus
- Division of Renal Medicine, Department of Clinical Science, Intervention and Technology, Karolinska University Hospital, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Oo MM, Proietti S, Gaboardi F, Giusti G. Clot stones in transplant kidneys. BMJ Case Rep 2024; 17:e256843. [PMID: 38182171 PMCID: PMC10773334 DOI: 10.1136/bcr-2023-256843] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/07/2024] Open
Abstract
We describe two cases of stones with unusual radiological characteristics in transplanted kidneys that originated from a blood clot as the nidus for lithogenesis. Both patients presented years after renal transplant, with gross haematuria. CT of the urinary tract showed a stone with a peripheral hyperdense shell (Hounsfield unit, HU >500) and a radiolucent centre (HU <100). Both patients underwent percutaneous nephrolithotomy successfully.Stone analysis showed that the outer shell was calcium oxalate monohydrate and further examination of the stone in the second case confirmed an inner layer of organised clot material. Although the management of these clot stones is similar to that of other types of stones, clinicians should be aware of such a phenomenon and investigate the patients for the possibility of stone formation after haematuria, especially in allograft kidneys.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mon Mon Oo
- Urology, San Raffaele Hospital, Milano, Lombardia, Italy
| | | | | | - Guido Giusti
- Urology, San Raffaele Hospital, Milano, Lombardia, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Piana A, Basile G, Masih S, Bignante G, Uleri A, Gallioli A, Prudhomme T, Boissier R, Pecoraro A, Campi R, Di Dio M, Alba S, Breda A, Territo A. Kidney stones in renal transplant recipients: A systematic review. Actas Urol Esp 2024; 48:79-104. [PMID: 37574010 DOI: 10.1016/j.acuroe.2023.08.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/21/2023] [Accepted: 07/10/2023] [Indexed: 08/15/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Lithiasis in renal graft recipients might be a dangerous condition with a potential risk of organ function impairment. EVIDENCE ACQUISITION A systematic literature search was conducted through February 2023. The primary objective was to assess the incidence of lithiasis in kidney transplant (KT) recipients. The secondary objective was to assess the timing of stone formation, localization and composition of stones, possible treatment options, and the incidence of graft loss. EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS A total of 41 non-randomized studies comprising 699 patients met our inclusion criteria. The age at lithiasis diagnosis ranged between 29-53 years. Incidence of urolithiasis ranged from 0.1-6.3%, usually diagnosed after 12 months from KT. Most of the stones were diagnosed in the calyces or in the pelvis. Calcium oxalate composition was the most frequent. Different treatment strategies were considered, namely active surveillance, ureteroscopy, percutaneous/combined approach, or open surgery. 15.73% of patients were submitted to extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL), while 26.75% underwent endoscopic lithotripsy or stone extraction. 18.03% of patients underwent percutaneous nephrolithotomy whilst 3.14% to a combined approach. Surgical lithotomy was performed in 5.01% of the cases. Global stone-free rate was around 80%. CONCLUSIONS Lithiasis in kidney transplant is a rare condition usually diagnosed after one year after surgery and mostly located in the calyces and renal pelvis, more frequently of calcium oxalate composition. Each of the active treatments is associated with good results in terms of stone-free rate, thus the surgical technique should be chosen according to the patient's characteristics and surgeon preferences.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A Piana
- Servicio de Urología, Hospital Romolo, Rocca di Neto, Italy; Departamento de Urología, Universidad de Turín, Turín, Italy.
| | - G Basile
- Unidad de Uro-oncología y Trasplante Renal, Servicio de Urología, Fundación Puigvert, Universidad Autónoma de Barcelona (UAB), Barcelona, Spain
| | - S Masih
- Servicio de Urología, Centro Médico de la Universidad de Toledo, Toledo, OH, United States
| | - G Bignante
- Departamento de Urología, Universidad de Turín, Turín, Italy
| | - A Uleri
- Unidad de Uro-oncología y Trasplante Renal, Servicio de Urología, Fundación Puigvert, Universidad Autónoma de Barcelona (UAB), Barcelona, Spain
| | - A Gallioli
- Unidad de Uro-oncología y Trasplante Renal, Servicio de Urología, Fundación Puigvert, Universidad Autónoma de Barcelona (UAB), Barcelona, Spain
| | - T Prudhomme
- Servicio de Urología, Trasplante Renal y Andrología, Hospital Universitario de Rangueil, Toulouse, France
| | - R Boissier
- Servicio de Urología y Trasplante Renal, Hospital Universitario La Concepción, Marsella, France
| | - A Pecoraro
- Departmento de Medicina Experimental y Clínica, Universidad de Florencia, Florencia, Italy
| | - R Campi
- Departmento de Medicina Experimental y Clínica, Universidad de Florencia, Florencia, Italy
| | - M Di Dio
- Sección de Urología, Servicio de Cirugía, Hospital Annunziata, Cosenza, Italy
| | - S Alba
- Servicio de Urología, Hospital Romolo, Rocca di Neto, Italy
| | - A Breda
- Unidad de Uro-oncología y Trasplante Renal, Servicio de Urología, Fundación Puigvert, Universidad Autónoma de Barcelona (UAB), Barcelona, Spain
| | - A Territo
- Unidad de Uro-oncología y Trasplante Renal, Servicio de Urología, Fundación Puigvert, Universidad Autónoma de Barcelona (UAB), Barcelona, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Ganesan C, Holmes M, Liu S, Montez-Rath M, Conti S, Chang TC, Lenihan CR, Cheng XS, Chertow GM, Leppert JT, Pao AC. Kidney Stone Events after Kidney Transplant in the United States. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol 2023; 18:777-784. [PMID: 37071657 PMCID: PMC10278781 DOI: 10.2215/cjn.0000000000000176] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/24/2022] [Accepted: 04/05/2023] [Indexed: 04/19/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Kidney stone disease is common and can lead to complications such as AKI, urinary tract obstruction, and urosepsis. In kidney transplant recipients, complications from kidney stone events can also lead to rejection and allograft failure. There is limited information on the incidence of kidney stone events in transplant recipients. METHODS We identified 83,535 patients from the United States Renal Data System who received their first kidney transplant between January 1, 2007, and December 31, 2018. We examined the incidence of kidney stone events and identified risk factors associated with a kidney stone event in the first 3 years after transplantation. RESULTS We found 1436 patients (1.7%) who were diagnosed with a kidney stone in the 3 years after kidney transplant. The unadjusted incidence rate for a kidney stone event was 7.8 per 1000 person-years. The median time from transplant to a kidney stone diagnosis was 0.61 (25%-75% range 0.19-1.46) years. Patients with a history of kidney stones were at greatest risk of a kidney stone event after transplant (hazard ratio [HR], 4.65; 95% confidence interval [CI], 3.82 to 5.65). Other notable risk factors included a diagnosis of gout (HR, 1.53; 95% CI, 1.31 to 1.80), hypertension (HR, 1.29; 95% CI, 1.00 to 1.66), and a dialysis of vintage of ≥9 years (HR, 1.48; 95% CI, 1.18 to 1.86; ref vintage ≤2.5 years). CONCLUSIONS Approximately 2% of kidney transplant recipients were diagnosed with a kidney stone in the 3 years after kidney transplant. Risk factors of a kidney stone event include a history of kidney stones and longer dialysis vintage.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Calyani Ganesan
- Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, Stanford University, Stanford, California
| | - Malorie Holmes
- Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, Stanford University, Stanford, California
| | - Sai Liu
- Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, Stanford University, Stanford, California
| | - Maria Montez-Rath
- Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, Stanford University, Stanford, California
| | - Simon Conti
- Department of Urology, Stanford University, Stanford, California
| | - Timothy C. Chang
- Department of Urology, Stanford University, Stanford, California
- Veterans Affairs Palo Alto Health Care System, Palo Alto, California
| | - Colin R. Lenihan
- Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, Stanford University, Stanford, California
| | - Xingxing S. Cheng
- Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, Stanford University, Stanford, California
| | - Glenn M. Chertow
- Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, Stanford University, Stanford, California
| | - John T. Leppert
- Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, Stanford University, Stanford, California
- Department of Urology, Stanford University, Stanford, California
- Veterans Affairs Palo Alto Health Care System, Palo Alto, California
| | - Alan C. Pao
- Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, Stanford University, Stanford, California
- Department of Urology, Stanford University, Stanford, California
- Veterans Affairs Palo Alto Health Care System, Palo Alto, California
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Aziz F, Jorgenson M, Garg N. Secondary oxalate nephropathy and kidney transplantation. Curr Opin Organ Transplant 2023; 28:15-21. [PMID: 36342385 DOI: 10.1097/mot.0000000000001035] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/09/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW Secondary hyperoxaluria is associated with poor kidney allograft outcomes after the kidney transplant. Calcium oxalate (CaOx) deposition is common in early allograft biopsies leading to acute tubular necrosis and poor kidney allograft function. Though treatment options for secondary hyperoxaluria are limited, it is crucial to identify patients at increased risk of oxalate nephropathy after the transplant. RECENT FINDINGS Recent data suggest that significant changes in renal replacement therapies and dietary modifications in high-risk patients can prevent kidney allograft damage from the calcium oxalate deposition leading to improve allograft outcomes. SUMMARY The accurate and timely diagnosis of secondary oxalate nephropathy in kidney transplant recipients is paramount to preserving graft function in the long-term. This review will discuss the incidence, risk factors, prevention, and management of oxalate nephropathy in the kidney allograft.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fahad Aziz
- Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health
| | - Margaret Jorgenson
- Department of Pharmacy, University of Wisconsin Hospital and Clinics, Madison, Wisconsin, USA
| | - Neetika Garg
- Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health
| |
Collapse
|