The association of acute kidney injury on outcomes in cancer patients receiving immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Development and validation of a nomogram for predicting the occurrence of renal dysfunction after treatment of immune checkpoint inhibitor: a retrospective case-control study

PURPOSE

The administration of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) may lead to renal adverse events, notably including renal dysfunction. To early predict the probability of renal dysfunction after ICIs therapy, a retrospective case-control study was conducted.

METHODS

Clinical information on ICIs-treated patients was collected. Multivariable logistic regression was applied to identify risk factors for renal dysfunction after ICIs treatment. Moreover, a nomogram model was developed and validated internally.

RESULTS

A total of 442 patients were included, among which 35 (7.9%) experienced renal dysfunction after ICIs treatment. Lower baseline estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) (OR 0.941; 95% CI 0.917 to 0.966; p<0.001), concurrent exposure of platinum(OR 4.014; 95% CI 1.557 to 10.346; p=0.004), comorbidities of hypertension (OR 3.478; 95% CI 1.600 to 7.562; p=0.002) and infection (OR 5.402; 95% CI 1.544 to 18.904; p=0.008) were found to be independent associated with renal dysfunction after ICIs treatment. To develop a predictive nomogram for the occurrence of renal dysfunction after ICIs treatment, the included cases were divided into training and validation groups in a ratio of 7:3 randomly. The above four independent risk factors were included in the model. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curves of the predictiive model were 0.822 (0.723-0.922) and 0.815 (0.699-0.930) in the training and validation groups, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Lower baseline eGFR, platinum exposure, comorbidities of hypertension and infection were predictors of renal dysfunction in ICIs-treated patients with cancer. A nomogram was developed to predict the probability of renal dysfunction after ICIs treatment, which might be operable and valuable in clinical practice.

Cancer drugs and acute kidney injury: new therapies and new challenges

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Cancer therapies continue to evolve at a rapid pace and although novel treatments, including immunotherapies and targeted therapies have allowed for substantial improvements in cancer survival, they carry associated risks of acute kidney injury (AKI). We aim to summarize the existing literature on AKI associated with the spectrum of systemic cancer treatments, including conventional chemotherapies, newer immunotherapies, and the growing number of targeted cancer therapies, which may be associated with both AKI and 'pseudo-AKI'.

RECENT FINDINGS

Conventional cytotoxic chemotherapies (e.g. cisplatin and other platinum-based agents, methotrexate, pemetrexed, ifosfamide, etc.) with well recognized nephrotoxicities (predominantly tubulointerstitial injury) remain in widespread use. Immunotherapies (e.g., immune checkpoint inhibitors and CAR-T therapies) may be associated with kidney immune-related adverse events, most often acute interstitial nephritis, and rarely, glomerular disease. Recently, multiple targeted cancer therapies have been associated with reduced renal tubular secretion of creatinine, causing elevations in serum creatinine and apparent 'pseudo-AKI'. To complicate matters further, these agents have had biopsy-proven, 'true' kidney injury attributed to them in numerous case reports.

SUMMARY

Clinicians in nephrology and oncology must be aware of the various potential kidney risks with these agents and recognize those with clinically meaningful impact on both cancer and kidney outcomes.

Association of Proton Pump Inhibitor Use and Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor-Mediated Acute Kidney Injury: A Meta-Analysis and a Review of Related Outcomes

INTRODUCTION

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have revolutionized cancer treatment. However, they pose the risk of immune-related adverse events, including ICI-mediated acute kidney injury (ICI-AKI). Recent studies have implicated proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) as potential contributors to ICI-AKI development. This meta-analysis examines the association between PPI use and ICI-AKI, exploring a potential modifiable risk factor in ICI therapy while also reviewing the possible outcomes of ICI-AKI.

METHODS

We conducted a comprehensive systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies, assessing the risk of ICI-AKI in cancer patients concurrently using PPIs and potential outcomes. Odds ratios (ORs) were pooled using random-effects models. Subgroup analyses and sensitivity analyses were performed to evaluate heterogeneity and potential biases.

RESULTS

A total of 14 studies involving 12,694 patients were included. In total, we analyzed 639 patients with all-cause AKI and 779 patients with ICI-AKI. The pooled OR for the overall incidence of AKI from all-causes was 1.57 (95% confidence interval [CI] 1.02-2.40) among patients on PPIs. Specifically, the risk of ICI-AKI associated with PPI use was significantly higher, with a pooled OR of 1.84 (95% CI 1.16-2.90). This indicates approximately 84% higher likelihood of developing ICI-AKI with concurrent use of PPIs. Additionally, among patients with ICI-AKI, 67% had complete or partial recovery of renal function, 32% progressed to chronic kidney disease (CKD), and about 36% died during a follow-up period of at least 3 months.

CONCLUSION

This meta-analysis highlights the importance of cautious PPI prescription in cancer patients undergoing ICI therapy. Clinicians are advised to evaluate the risks and benefits of PPI use and consider alternative therapies when feasible.

Nephrotoxicity in the Age of Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors: Mechanisms, Diagnosis, and Management

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) revolutionized cancer therapy by augmenting anti-tumor immunity via cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated protein 4 (CTLA-4) and programmed death-1/programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-1/PD-L1). However, this breakthrough is accompanied by immune-related adverse effects (irAEs), including renal complications. ICI-related nephritis involves complex mechanisms like auto-reactive T cells, auto-antibodies, reactivation of drug-specific T cells, and cytokine-driven inflammation culminating in AKI. ICI-AKI typically manifests weeks to months into treatment, often with other irAEs. Timely detection relies on monitoring creatinine levels and urine characteristics. Biomarkers, like soluble interleukin-2 receptor (sIL-2R) and urine cytokine levels, provide non-invasive insights, while renal biopsy remains the gold standard for confirmation. Management of ICI-AKI requires a balance between discontinuing ICI therapy and prompt immunosuppressive intervention, typically with corticosteroids. Some cases permit ICI therapy resumption, but varying renal recovery rates highlight the importance of vigilant monitoring and effective therapy. Beyond its clinical implications, the potential of irAEs to predict positive treatment responses in certain cancers raises intriguing questions. Data on nephritis-treatment response links are limited, and ongoing research explores this complex interaction. In summary, ICI therapy's transformative impact on cancer treatment is counterbalanced by irAEs, including nephritis. Early recognition and management are vital, with ongoing research refining diagnostic and treatment strategies.

The renal damage and mechanisms relevant to antitumoral drugs

Over the past few decades, significant progress has been made in the development of drugs to combat cancer. It is unfortunate that these drugs can also lead to various kidney injuries and imbalances in electrolyte levels. Nephrotoxicity caused by chemotherapy drugs can impact different parts of the kidneys, including the glomeruli, renal tubules, interstitium, or renal microvessels. Despite the existing knowledge, our understanding of the mechanisms underlying the renal damage caused by antitumoral drugs remains incomplete. In this review, we aim to provide a comprehensive overview of the specific types of kidney injury and the mechanisms responsible for the drug-mediated renal damage, and briefly discuss possible prevention and treatment measures. Sensitive blood and urine biomarkers can provide clinicians with more information about kidney injury detection and reference value for subsequent treatment options. In addition, we emphasize that both oncologists and nephrologists have a responsibility to remain vigilant against the potential nephrotoxicity of the drugs. It's crucial for experts in both fields to collaborate in early detection, monitoring and prevention of kidney damage.

Immunotherapy in oncology and the kidneys: a clinical review of the evaluation and management of kidney immune-related adverse events

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) are now widely used in the treatment of many cancers, and currently represent the standard of care for multiple malignancies. These agents enhance the T cell immune response to target cancer tissues, and have demonstrated considerable benefits for cancer outcomes. However, despite these improved outcomes, there are important kidney immune-related adverse events (iRAEs) associated with ICI. Acute tubulo-interstitial nephritis remains the most frequent kidney iRAE, however glomerular lesions and electrolytes disturbances are increasingly being recognized and reported. In this review, we summarize clinical features and identify risk factors for kidney iRAEs, and discuss the current understanding of pathophysiologic mechanisms. We highlight the evidence basis for guideline-recommended management of ICI-related kidney injury as well as gaps in current knowledge. We advocate for judicious use of kidney biopsy to identify ICI-associated kidney injury, and early use of corticosteroid treatment where appropriate. Selected patients may also be candidates for re-challenge with ICI therapy after a kidney iRAE, in view of current data on recurrent rates of kidney injury. Risk of benefits of re-challenge must be considered on an individual considering patient preferences and prognosis. Lastly, we review current knowledge of ICI use in the setting of patients with end-stage kidney disease, including kidney transplant recipients and those receiving dialysis, which suggest that these patients should not be summarily excluded from the potential benefits of these cancer therapies.

Revisiting the role of acute kidney injury in patients on immune checkpoint inhibitors: a good prognosis renal event with a significant impact on survival

In the last decade, immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) have become a cornerstone in the treatment of a wide range of malignancies. It is well established that ICI are associated with multiple immune-related adverse events, a spectrum of autoimmune toxicities, that can also affect the kidney. In this issue of Clinical Kidney Journal, Kanbay et al. report the first meta-analysis and systematic review evaluating the impact of ICI-related acute kidney injury (ICI-AKI) on long-term kidney and patient outcomes (including mortality). The authors report a high incidence of ICI-AKI (mostly mild AKI episodes) with high rates of recovery resulting in a good kidney outcomes. However, the occurrence of ICI-AKI has a significant impact on mortality in ICI-treated patients probably related to temporary or definitive cessation of ICI. Additional studies are needed to establish the safety of ICI re-challenging in patients with ICI-AKI, and to determine the optimal treatment strategy for them.

Immune checkpoints inhibitors and its link to acute kidney injury and renal prognosis

BACKGROUND

Immunotherapy with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICPi) may cause acute kidney injury (AKI) and their use is increasing.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This is a single-center retrospective cohort study of patients receiving ICPi drugs for solid organ malignancies. ICPi-related AKI, the need for renal replacement therapy during or following ICPi treatment, and the associated mortality was studied.

RESULTS

Two hundred thirty five patients were included in the final analysis. Patients with (N = 40) and without (n = 195) AKI had similar age, sex, type of ICPi, baseline serum creatinine levels, comorbidities and mortality; while patients with AKI were more likely to be receiving a nephrotoxic agent or be treated for genitourinary malignancy. 18 patients had ICPi-related AKI; 7 of these patients underwent kidney biopsy, which showed acute interstitial nephritis while the remaining 11 were diagnosed on clinical parameters. 18 (45%) patients recovered kidney function after AKI. No differences were observed between patients with and without kidney function recovery, although patients without recovery had a numerical, but not statistically significant, higher mortality. Patients with biopsy-confirmed ICPi-induced AKI had an increased risk of mortality, as compared with the rest of the population-HR 1.83, 95% CI 1.22-2.74, p = 0.003.

CONCLUSION

Use of nephrotoxic drugs and the location of malignancy appear to be common drivers of AKI in patients receiving ICPis for solid organ malignancy. Whether nephrotoxic agents or urinary tract obstruction may favor ICPi-related autoimmunity should be further studied.

Onconephrology 2022: An Update

Onconephrology is an upcoming and expanding subspecialty that deals with the intersections between hematology/oncology and nephrology. With the paradigm shift in the understanding of cancer immunobiology and mechanisms of oncotherapeutic drug toxicities, it is important for a nephrologist to have a sound understanding of this field. Over the last 5 years, there have been immense developments in our understanding of kidney-related adverse events from various targeted, immuno- and cellular-based therapies. Pathogenic mechanisms of electrolyte imbalance, hypertension (oncohypertension), and AKI from multiple forms of cancer therapies have been explored. Significant research has also been conducted in the field of transplant onconephrology. In this review, we have tried to assimilate the most recent updates in the last 2 years in this ever-growing and fascinating field.