1
|
Desbiens LC, Bargman JM, Chan CT, Nadeau-Fredette AC. Integrated home dialysis model: facilitating home-to-home transition. Clin Kidney J 2024; 17:i21-i33. [PMID: 38846416 PMCID: PMC11151120 DOI: 10.1093/ckj/sfae079] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/03/2023] [Indexed: 06/09/2024] Open
Abstract
Peritoneal dialysis (PD) and home hemodialysis (HHD) are the two home dialysis modalities offered to patients. They promote patient autonomy, enhance independence, and are generally associated with better quality of life compared to facility hemodialysis. PD offers some advantages (enhanced flexibility, ability to travel, preservation of residual kidney function, and vascular access sites) but few patients remain on PD indefinitely due to peritonitis and other complications. By contrast, HHD incurs longer and more intensive training combined with increased upfront health costs compared to PD, but is easier to sustain in the long term. As a result, the integrated home dialysis model was proposed to combine the advantages of both home-based dialysis modalities. In this paradigm, patients are encouraged to initiate dialysis on PD and transfer to HHD after PD termination. Available evidence demonstrates the feasibility and safety of this approach and some observational studies have shown that patients who undergo the PD-to-HHD transition have clinical outcomes comparable to patients who initiate dialysis directly on HHD. Nevertheless, the prevalence of PD-to-HHD transfers remains low, reflecting the multiple barriers that prevent the full uptake of home-to-home transitions, notably a lack of awareness about the model, home-care "burnout," clinical inertia after a transfer to facility HD, suboptimal integration of PD and HHD centers, and insufficient funding for home dialysis programs. In this review, we will examine the conceptual advantages and disadvantages of integrated home dialysis, present the evidence that underlies it, identify challenges that prevent its success and finally, propose solutions to increase its adoption.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Louis-Charles Desbiens
- Department of Medicine, Université de Montréal, Montreal, Canada
- Department of Medicine, Hôpital Maisonneuve-Rosemont, Montreal, Canada
| | - Joanne M Bargman
- Toronto General Hospital, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Christopher T Chan
- Toronto General Hospital, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Annie-Claire Nadeau-Fredette
- Department of Medicine, Université de Montréal, Montreal, Canada
- Department of Medicine, Hôpital Maisonneuve-Rosemont, Montreal, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Nel H, Debbie F, Narelle H, Sean R, Aron C. A retrospective clinical and economic analysis of an assisted automated peritoneal dialysis programme in Western Australia . Perit Dial Int 2024; 44:203-210. [PMID: 37635394 DOI: 10.1177/08968608231190772] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 08/29/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Assisted peritoneal dialysis (aPD) represents an alternative kidney replacement therapy for dialysis-dependent patients whose only other options are prolonged hospitalisations or transfer to in-centre haemodialysis (HD). Most programmes have not examined the role of temporary aPD, and there is limited data surrounding the economic implications of temporary aPD programmes. The main aim of this study was to describe the cost-effectiveness of an assisted automated peritoneal dialysis (aAPD) programme, for patients whose only reason to stay in hospital was the temporary inability to independently perform PD at home. METHODS Retrospective, single-centre analysis of 45 referrals for aAPD from November 2015 to May 2021. Two groups of patients were enrolled in the study: respite patients already established on PD (to facilitate discharge or prevent admission) and new patients who were not yet trained (to facilitate discharge). To calculate the cost differential, patients were allocated to either staying in hospital or transferring to centre-based HD with comparison to costs on aAPD. Costs were calculated using a healthcare system perspective over the duration of aAPD assistance. Clinical outcomes including peritonitis rate, hospitalisation and mortality were also assessed. RESULTS Overall, 1349 episodes of aAPD care were delivered. One thousand forty-two episodes (77%) were for respite patients and 307 episodes (23%) were for new patients awaiting training. The mean duration of assistance was 18 days for pretraining patients and 37 days for respite patients. Overall, the mean length of stay on the programme was 30 days with a range of 1-263 days (SD 43) and 73% of patients graduated to self-care PD. The cost of the aAPD programme was $242 per visit, with an average cost $7260 per patient-episode. The aAPD programme was significantly cheaper than the alternatives, with average hospitalization costs $46,170 per episode, and in-centre HD costs of $9667. $1.497 million was saved over the course of the study. Eleven hospitalisations occurred and the peritonitis rate was 0.8 episodes per patient-year. Two patients died while on aAPD. CONCLUSION This study provides the first detailed description of an aAPD respite programme in Australia. We conclude that the implementation of a temporary aAPD programme could lead to a significant reduction in healthcare costs, however peritonitis rates were high.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Henco Nel
- Renal Unit, Sir Charles Gairdner Hospital, Nedlands, Western Australia, Australia
- HomeLink Service, Sir Charles Gairdner Hospital, Nedlands, Western Australia, Australia
| | - Fortnum Debbie
- Renal Unit, Sir Charles Gairdner Hospital, Nedlands, Western Australia, Australia
| | - Hawkins Narelle
- HomeLink Service, Sir Charles Gairdner Hospital, Nedlands, Western Australia, Australia
| | - Randall Sean
- School of Population Health, Faculty of Health Sciences, Curtin University, Perth, Western Australia, Australia
| | - Chakera Aron
- Renal Unit, Sir Charles Gairdner Hospital, Nedlands, Western Australia, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Reyskens M, Abrahams AC, François K, van Eck van der Sluijs A. Assisted peritoneal dialysis in Europe: a strategy to increase and maintain home dialysis. Clin Kidney J 2024; 17:i34-i43. [PMID: 38846415 PMCID: PMC11151117 DOI: 10.1093/ckj/sfae078] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/23/2023] [Indexed: 06/09/2024] Open
Abstract
Peritoneal dialysis (PD) is a form of kidney replacement therapy with the major advantage that it can be performed at home. This has a positive impact on patients' autonomy and quality of life. However, the dialysis population is ageing and physical and/or cognitive impairments are common. These limitations often form a barrier to PD and contribute to the low incidence and prevalence of PD in Europe. Assisted PD can be a solution to this problem. Assisted PD refers to a patient being assisted by a person or device in performing all or part of their dialysis-related tasks, thereby making PD more accessible to elderly but also younger frail patients. In this way, offering an assisted PD program can help lower the threshold for initiating PD. In this review, we provide an overview of the epidemiology of assisted PD in Europe, we discuss the different categories and clinical outcomes of assisted PD, and we present how assisted PD can be implemented in clinical practice as a possible strategy to increase and maintain home dialysis in Europe.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Margot Reyskens
- Vrije Universiteit Brussel (VUB), Universitair Ziekenhuis Brussel (UZ Brussel), Division of Nephrology and Hypertension, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Alferso C Abrahams
- Department of Nephrology and Hypertension, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Karlien François
- Vrije Universiteit Brussel (VUB), Universitair Ziekenhuis Brussel (UZ Brussel), Division of Nephrology and Hypertension, Brussels, Belgium
| | | |
Collapse
|
4
|
Brown EA, Ekstrand A, Gallieni M, Gorrín MR, Gudmundsdottir H, Guedes AM, Heidempergher M, Kitsche B, Lobbedez T, Lundström UH, McCarthy K, Mellotte GJ, Moranne O, Petras D, Povlsen JV, Punzalan S, Wiesholzer M. Availability of assisted peritoneal dialysis in Europe: call for increased and equal access. Nephrol Dial Transplant 2022; 37:2080-2089. [PMID: 35671088 DOI: 10.1093/ndt/gfac193] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/31/2022] [Indexed: 11/14/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Availability of assisted PD (asPD) increases access to dialysis at home, particularly for the increasing numbers of older and frail people with advanced kidney disease. Although asPD has been widely used in some European countries for many years, it remains unavailable or poorly utilised in others. A group of leading European nephrologists have therefore formed a group to drive increased availability of asPD in Europe and in their own countries. METHODS Members of the group filled in a proforma with the following headings: personal experience, country experience, who are the assistants, funding of asPD, barriers to growth, what is needed to grow, and their top 3 priorities. RESULTS Only 5 of the 13 countries surveyed provided publicly funded reimbursement for asPD. The use of asPD depends on overall attitudes to PD with all respondents mentioning need for nephrology team education and/or patient education and involvement in dialysis modality decision making. CONCLUSION AND CALL TO ACTION Many people with advanced kidney disease would prefer to have their dialysis at home, yet if the frail patient chooses PD most healthcare systems cannot provide their choice. AsPD should be available in all countries in Europe and for all renal centres. The top priorities to make this happen are education of renal healthcare teams about the advantages of PD, education of and discussion with patients and their families as they approach the need for dialysis, and engagement with policy makers and healthcare providers to develop and support assistance for PD.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Edwina A Brown
- Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, Imperial College Renal and Transplant Centre, London, UK
| | - Agneta Ekstrand
- Helsinki University Hospital, Abdomen Center, Nephrology, Helsinki, Finland
| | - Maurizio Gallieni
- Department of Biomedical and Clinical Sciences, Università di Milano, Italy.,Nephrology and Dialysis Unit, ASST Fatebenefratelli Sacco, Milano, Italy
| | - Maite Rivera Gorrín
- Hospital Ramón y Cajal, Servicio de Nefrología. UAH. IRyCis. Carretera de Colmenar km 9, 100 28034 Madrid, Spain
| | | | - Anabela Malho Guedes
- Serviço de Nefrologia, Centro Hospitalar Universitário do Algarve, Faro, Portugal
| | | | - Benno Kitsche
- Kuratorium für Dialyse und Nierentransplantation e.V., Cologne.,NADia - Netzwerk assistierte Dialyse, Berlin, Germany
| | - Thierry Lobbedez
- Néphrologie, CHU CAEN, Avenue de la Côte de Nacre, CAEN CEDEX 9, France
| | - Ulrika Hahn Lundström
- Division of Renal Medicine, Department of Clinical Science, Intervention and Technology, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Kate McCarthy
- Baxter Healthcare Ltd, Wallingford, Compton, Newbury, UK
| | - George J Mellotte
- Trinity Health Kidney Centre, Tallaght University Hospital, Tallaght, Dublin NROA
| | - Olivier Moranne
- Department Nephrology-Dialysis-Apheresis, CHU Caremeau Nimes, France
| | - Dimitrios Petras
- Department of Nephrology, General Hospital 'Hippokration', Athens, Greece
| | - Johan V Povlsen
- Dept. Renal Medicine, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Sally Punzalan
- Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, Imperial College Renal and Transplant Centre, London, UK
| | - Martin Wiesholzer
- Clinical Department for Internal Medicine1, University Hospital St.Poelten, Austria, Karl Landsteiner University of Health Sciences
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
van Eck van der Sluijs A, van Jaarsveld BC, Allen J, Altabas K, Béchade C, Bonenkamp AA, Burkhalter F, Clause AL, Corbett RW, Dekker FW, Eden G, François K, Gudmundsdottir H, Lundström UH, de Laforcade L, Lambie M, Martin H, Pajek J, Panuccio V, Ros-Ruiz S, Steubl D, Vega A, Wojtaszek E, Davies SJ, Van Biesen W, Abrahams AC. Assisted peritoneal dialysis across Europe: Practice variation and factors associated with availability. Perit Dial Int 2021; 41:533-541. [PMID: 34672219 DOI: 10.1177/08968608211049882] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND In Europe, the number of elderly end-stage kidney disease patients is increasing. Few of those patients receive peritoneal dialysis (PD), as many cannot perform PD autonomously. Assisted PD programmes are available in most European countries, but the percentage of patients receiving assisted PD varies considerably. Hence, we assessed which factors are associated with the availability of an assisted PD programme at a centre level and whether the availability of this programme is associated with proportion of home dialysis patients. METHODS An online survey was sent to healthcare professionals of European nephrology units. After selecting one respondent per centre, the associations were explored by χ 2 tests and (ordinal) logistic regression. RESULTS In total, 609 respondents completed the survey. Subsequently, 288 respondents from individual centres were identified; 58% worked in a centre with an assisted PD programme. Factors associated with availability of an assisted PD programme were Western European and Scandinavian countries (OR: 5.73; 95% CI: 3.07-10.68), non-academic centres (OR: 2.01; 95% CI: 1.09-3.72) and centres with a dedicated team for education (OR: 2.87; 95% CI: 1.35-6.11). Most Eastern & Central European respondents reported that the proportion of incident and prevalent home dialysis patients was <10% (72% and 63%), while 27% of Scandinavian respondents reported a proportion of >30% for both incident and prevalent home dialysis patients. Availability of an assisted PD programme was associated with a higher incidence (cumulative OR: 1.91; 95% CI: 1.21-3.01) and prevalence (cumulative OR: 2.81; 95% CI: 1.76-4.47) of patients on home dialysis. CONCLUSIONS Assisted PD was more commonly offered among non-academic centres with a dedicated team for education across Europe, especially among Western European and Scandinavian countries where higher incidence and prevalence of home dialysis patients was reported.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Brigit C van Jaarsveld
- Department of Nephrology, 522567Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Research institute Amsterdam Cardiovascular Sciences, the Netherlands.,Diapriva Dialysis Centre, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Jennifer Allen
- Renal and Transplant Unit, 9820Nottingham University NHS Trust, UK
| | - Karmela Altabas
- Division of Nephrology and Dialysis, Clinical Hospital Centre Sestre Milosrdnice, Zagreb, Croatia
| | - Clémence Béchade
- Service Néphrologie-Dialyse-Transplantation, Normandie University, UNICAEN, CHU de Caen Normandie, Caen, France
| | - Anna A Bonenkamp
- Department of Nephrology, 522567Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Research institute Amsterdam Cardiovascular Sciences, the Netherlands
| | - Felix Burkhalter
- Division of Nephrology, University Clinic of Medicine, 367307Kantonsspital Baselland, Liestal, Switzerland
| | | | - Richard W Corbett
- Renal and Transplant Centre, Hammersmith Hospital, 8946Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, UK
| | - Friedo W Dekker
- Department of Clinical Epidemiology, Leiden University Medical Centre, the Netherlands
| | - Gabriele Eden
- Medical Clinic V (Nephrology, Rheumatology, Blood Purification), Academic Teaching Hospital Braunschweig, Germany
| | - Karlien François
- Division of Nephrology and Hypertension, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, 60201Universitair Ziekenhuis Brussel, Belgium
| | | | - Ulrika Hahn Lundström
- Division of Renal Medicine, 206106Department of Clinical Science, Intervention and Technology (CLINTEC), Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Louis de Laforcade
- Service d'Endocrinologie-Néphrologie, 377376Centre Hospitalier Pierre Oudot, Bourgoin-Jallieu, France
| | - Mark Lambie
- Faculty of Medicine and Health Science, Keele University, Stoke on Trent, UK
| | | | - Jernej Pajek
- Department of Nephrology, University Medical Centre Ljubljana, Slovenia and Medical Faculty, University of Ljubljana, Slovenia
| | - Vincenzo Panuccio
- Nephrology, Dialysis and Renal Transplant Unit, Grande Ospedale Metropolitano 'Bianchi Melacrino Morelli', Reggio Calabria, Italy
| | - Silvia Ros-Ruiz
- Department of Nephrology, Elche University General Hospital, Alicante, Spain
| | - Dominik Steubl
- Faculty of Medicine, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University Munich, Germany
| | - Almudena Vega
- Department of Nephrology, Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañón, Madrid, Spain
| | - Ewa Wojtaszek
- Department of Nephrology, Dialysis & Internal Diseases, The Medical University of Warsaw, Poland
| | - Simon J Davies
- Faculty of Medicine and Health Science, Keele University, Stoke on Trent, UK
| | - Wim Van Biesen
- Department of Nephrology, Ghent University Hospital, Belgium
| | - Alferso C Abrahams
- Department of Nephrology and Hypertension, 8124University Medical Centre Utrecht, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Häckl D, Kossack N, Schoenfelder T. [Prevalence, Costs of Medical Treatment and Modalities of Dialysis-dependent Chronic Renal Failure in Germany: Comparison of Dialysis Care of Nursing Home Residents and in Outpatient Units]. DAS GESUNDHEITSWESEN 2021; 83:818-828. [PMID: 33450773 PMCID: PMC8497075 DOI: 10.1055/a-1330-7152] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/09/2022]
Abstract
STUDY OBJECTIVES Current estimates on the prevalence of chronic renal failure and the costs of dialysis in Germany's population are not available. The aim of this study was to assess the prevalence of dialysis-dependent chronic renal failure and treatment costs of dialysis-dependent patients in Germany as well as differences between those residing in nursing homes and those treated in outpatient units. METHODS Health insurance claims from 4.5 million anonymized patients in the WIG2 research database were analyzed. Patients of all ages who had received outpatient dialysis treatment for chronic renal failure in 2017 (using uniform value scale code 13602) were included. These insurance claims were extrapolated to the German statutory health insurance population and, using official statistics, further to the entire population of Germany. Data on comorbidities, use of health resources, and costs were compared among patients residing in nursing homes and those treated in outpatient units. RESULTS In 2017, there were 87,255 dialysis-dependent statutory health insurance patients (≙1,054 person/1 million population, pmp), and 100,202 in Germany's whole population (≙1,210 pmp). About 8% of dialysis-dependent patients (n=7,676) were living in nursing homes. Our analyses predict an increase in dialysis-dependent patients of about 20-23% (up to 120,000-123,000), with an increase of dialysis-dependent nursing home residents of 37-44% (up to 10,500-11,000) by 2040. Almost all dialysis-dependent patients were treated with hemodialysis; peritoneal dialysis was rarely observed. The average annual treatment costs for dialysis-dependent patients residing in nursing homes amounted to 57,205 Euro and 53,996 Euro per patient respectively, with total annual statutory health insurance treatment costs amounting to about 4.73 billion Euro in 2017. CONCLUSION This study presents current estimates for dialysis-dependent chronic renal failure in Germany. Our findings on prevalence are comparable to data from other European countries and suggest a considerable increase in dialysis dependency by 2040, particularly for nursing home residents, resulting in a further increase in dialysis care costs. Hemodialysis was the most commonly used dialysis modality in patients living both in and out of nursing care facilities, with peritoneal dialysis rarely being used.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dennis Häckl
- Wissenschaftliches Institut für Gesundheitsökonomie und Gesundheitssystemforschung, (WIG2), Leipzig, Deutschland
| | - Nils Kossack
- Wissenschaftliches Institut für Gesundheitsökonomie und Gesundheitssystemforschung, (WIG2), Leipzig, Deutschland
| | - Tonio Schoenfelder
- Wissenschaftliches Institut für Gesundheitsökonomie und Gesundheitssystemforschung, (WIG2), Leipzig, Deutschland
- Technische Universität Dresden, Lehrstuhl für Gesundheitswissenschaften/Public Health, Dresden, Deutschland
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Portolés J, Vega A, Lacoba E, López-Sánchez P, Botella M, Yuste C, Martín Cleary C, Sanz Ballesteros S, González Sanchidrian S, Sánchez García L, Carreño A, Bajo MA, Janeiro D. Is peritoneal dialysis suitable technique CKD patients over 65 years? A prospective multicenter study. Nefrologia 2021; 41:529-538. [PMID: 36165135 DOI: 10.1016/j.nefroe.2021.11.012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/22/2020] [Accepted: 10/18/2020] [Indexed: 06/16/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Chronic kidney disease (CKD) is increasing in patients older than 65 years and is related to morbidity, frailty, and dependence. Peritoneal dialysis (PD) has classically been associated with young patients with an active life. HYPOTHESIS PD should be offered to patients over 65 years. We search for any unfavorable results that may advice not to recommend PD therapy for this group. OBJECTIVE To describe PD treatment and outcomes in patients > 65 years, to compare their results with patients < 65 years and to identify areas with room for improvement in a real-life study. STUDY Prospective, observational, and multicenter study performed in incident PD patients, from January 2003 until January 2018. RESULTS We included 2,435 PD patients, 31.9% were older than 65 years; there was a difference of 25 years between both groups. Median follow up was 2.1 years. Older than 65 years group had more comorbidity: Diabetes (29.5% vs 17.2%; p < 0.001), previous CV events 34.5% vs 14.0%; p < 0.001), Charlson index (3.8 vs 3.0; p < 0.001). We did not find differences in efficacy and PD adequacy objectives fulfillment, anaemia management or blood pressure during follow-up. Peritonitis rate was higher in older 65 years group (0.65 vs 0.45 episodes/patient/year; p < 0.001), but there was not differences in germs, admission rate and follow up. Mortality was higher in older 65 years group (28.4% vs 9.4%) as expected. PD permanence probability was similar (2.1 years). The main cause of PD withdrawal was transplant in group < 65 years (48.3%) and transfer to HD in group > 65 years. The main reason was caregiver or patient fatigue (20.2%), and not technique failure (7.3%). Multivariate Cox regression analysis showed a relation (HR [95%CI]) between mortality and age > 65 years 2.4 [1.9-3.0]; DM 1.6 [1.3-2.1]; CV events 2.1 [1.7-2.7]. Multivariate Cox regression analysis identify a relation between technique failure and age > 65 years 1.5 [1.3-1.9]; DM 1.6 [1.3-1.9] and previous transplant 1.5 [1.2-2.0]. CONCLUSION Patients older than 65 years fulfilled PD adequacy criteria during the follow up. We believe PD is a valid option for patients older 65 years. It is necessary to try to prevent infections and patient/caregiver fatigue, to avoid HD transfer for reasons not related to technique failure.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jose Portolés
- Servicio de Nefrología, H. Universitario Puerta de Hierro, Madrid, Spain; REDInREN RETIC ISCIII 016/009, Spain.
| | - Almudena Vega
- Servicio de Nefrología, H. Universitario Gregorio Marañón, Madrid, Spain; REDInREN RETIC ISCIII 016/009, Spain
| | - Enrique Lacoba
- Servicio de Nefrología, H. Universitario Puerta de Hierro, Madrid, Spain; REDInREN RETIC ISCIII 016/009, Spain
| | | | - Mario Botella
- Servicio de Nefrología, H. Universitario Puerta de Hierro, Madrid, Spain
| | - Claudia Yuste
- REDInREN RETIC ISCIII 016/009, Spain; Servicio de Nefrología, H. Universitario Doce de Octubre, Madrid, Spain
| | - Catalina Martín Cleary
- REDInREN RETIC ISCIII 016/009, Spain; Servicio de Nefrología, Fundación Jiménez Díaz, Madrid, Spain
| | | | | | | | - Agustín Carreño
- Servicio de Nefrología, H. Universitario Ciudad Real, Ciudad Real, Spain
| | - M Auxiliadora Bajo
- REDInREN RETIC ISCIII 016/009, Spain; Servicio de Nefrología, H. Universitario La Paz, Madrid, Spain
| | - Darío Janeiro
- Servicio de Nefrología, H. Universitario Puerta de Hierro, Madrid, Spain; REDInREN RETIC ISCIII 016/009, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Mendu ML, Divino-Filho JC, Vanholder R, Mitra S, Davies SJ, Jha V, Damron KC, Gallego D, Seger M. Expanding Utilization of Home Dialysis: An Action Agenda From the First International Home Dialysis Roundtable. Kidney Med 2021; 3:635-643. [PMID: 34401729 PMCID: PMC8350829 DOI: 10.1016/j.xkme.2021.04.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/12/2023] Open
Abstract
In a groundbreaking meeting, leading global kidney disease organizations came together in the fall of 2020 as an International Home Dialysis Roundtable (IHDR) to address strategies to increase access to and uptake of home dialysis, both peritoneal dialysis and home hemodialysis. This challenge has become urgent in the wake of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, during which patients with advanced kidney disease, who are more susceptible to viral infections and severe complications, must be able to safely physically distance at home. To boost access to home dialysis on a global scale, IHDR members committed to collaborate, through the COVID-19 public health emergency and beyond, to promote uptake of home dialysis on a broad scale. Their commitments included increasing the reach and influence of key stakeholders with policy makers, building a cooperative of advocates and champions for home dialysis, working together to increase patient engagement and empowerment, and sharing intelligence about policy, education, and other programs so that such efforts can be operationalized globally. In the spirit of international cooperation, IHDR members agreed to document, amplify, and replicate established efforts shown to improve access to home dialysis and support new policies that facilitate access through procedures, innovation, and reimbursement.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mallika L. Mendu
- Division of Renal Medicine, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
- Department of the Chief Medical Officer, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, MA
| | - José Carolino Divino-Filho
- Division of Renal Medicine, CLINTEC, Karolinska Institute, Campus Flemingsberg, Stockholm, Sweden
- Latin America Chapter (LAC-DD)-International Society for Peritoneal Dialysis
| | - Raymond Vanholder
- Nephrology Section, Department of Internal Medicine and Pediatrics, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent
- European Kidney Health Alliance (EKHA), Brussels, Belgium
| | - Sandip Mitra
- Department of Renal Medicine, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester
- Manchester Academic Health Sciences Centre, University of Manchester, Manchester
- National Institute of Health Research MedTech and In-vitro Diagnostics Co-operative, Devices for Dignity, Sheffield
| | - Simon J. Davies
- Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Keele University, Keele, United Kingdom
| | - Vivekanand Jha
- George Institute for Global Health, University of New South Wales (UNSW), New Delhi, India
- School of Public Health, Imperial College, London, United Kingdom
- Prasanna School of Public Health, Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Manipal, India
| | | | | | | | - International Home Dialysis Roundtable Steering Committee
- Division of Renal Medicine, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
- Department of the Chief Medical Officer, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, MA
- Division of Renal Medicine, CLINTEC, Karolinska Institute, Campus Flemingsberg, Stockholm, Sweden
- Latin America Chapter (LAC-DD)-International Society for Peritoneal Dialysis
- Nephrology Section, Department of Internal Medicine and Pediatrics, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent
- European Kidney Health Alliance (EKHA), Brussels, Belgium
- Department of Renal Medicine, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester
- Manchester Academic Health Sciences Centre, University of Manchester, Manchester
- National Institute of Health Research MedTech and In-vitro Diagnostics Co-operative, Devices for Dignity, Sheffield
- Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Keele University, Keele, United Kingdom
- George Institute for Global Health, University of New South Wales (UNSW), New Delhi, India
- School of Public Health, Imperial College, London, United Kingdom
- Prasanna School of Public Health, Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Manipal, India
- National Kidney Foundation, New York, NY
- European Kidney Patients Federation, Vienna, Austria
- Venn Strategies, Washington, DC
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Schreiber MJ, Chatoth DK, Salenger P. Challenges and Opportunities in Expanding Home Hemodialysis for 2025. Adv Chronic Kidney Dis 2021; 28:129-135. [PMID: 34717858 DOI: 10.1053/j.ackd.2021.06.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
The Advancing American Kidney Health Initiative has set an aggressive target for home dialysis growth in the United States, and expanding both peritoneal dialysis and home hemodialysis (HHD) will be required. While there has been a growth in HHD across the United States in the last decade, its value in controlling specific risk factors has been underappreciated and as such its appropriate utilization has lagged. Repositioning how nephrologists incorporate HHD as a critical renal replacement therapy will require overcoming a number of barriers. Advancing education of both nephrology trainees and nephrologists in practice, along with increasing patient and family education on the benefits and requirements for HHD, is essential. Implementation of a transitional care unit design coupled with an intensive patient curriculum will increase patient awareness and comfort for HHD; patients on peritoneal dialysis reaching a modality transition point will benefit from Experience the Difference programs acclimating them to HHD. In addition, the potential link between HHD program size and patient outcomes will necessitate an increase in the size of the average HHD program to more consistently deliver quality dialysis results. Addressing the implications of the nursing shortage and need for designing in scope staffing models are necessary to safeguard HHD growth. Seemingly, certain government payment policy changes and physician documentation requirements deserve further examination. Future HHD innovations must result in decreasing the burden of care for HHD patients, optimize the level of device and biometric data flow, facilitate a more functional centralized patient management care approach, and leverage computerized clinical decision support for modality assignment.
Collapse
|
10
|
Portolés J, Vega A, Lacoba E, López-Sánchez P, Botella M, Yuste C, Martín Cleary C, Sanz Ballesteros S, González Sanchidrian S, Sánchez García L, Carreño A, Bajo MA, Janeiro D. Is peritoneal dialysis suitable technique CKD patients over 65 years? A prospective multicenter study. Nefrologia 2021. [PMID: 33610372 DOI: 10.1016/j.nefro.2020.10.010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/28/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Chronic kidney disease (CKD) is increasing in patients older than 65years and is related to morbidity, frailty, and dependence. Peritoneal dialysis (PD) has classically been associated with young patients with an active life. HYPOTHESIS PD should be offered to patients over 65years. We search for any unfavorable results that may advice not to recommend PD therapy for this group. OBJECTIVE To describe PD treatment and outcomes in patients >65years, to compare their results with patients <65years and to identify areas with room for improvement in a real-life study. STUDY Prospective, observational, and multicenter study performed in incident PD patients, from January 2003 until January 2018. RESULTS We included 2,435 PD patients, 31.9% were older than 65years; there was a difference of 25years between both groups. Median follow up was 2.1years. Older than 65years group had more comorbidity: Diabetes (29.5% vs 17.2%; p<0.001), previous CV events 34.5% vs 14.0%; p<0.001), Charlson index (3.8 vs 3.0; p<0.001). We did not find differences in efficacy and PD adequacy objectives fulfillment, anaemia management or blood pressure during follow-up. Peritonitis rate was higher in older 65years group (0.65 vs 0.45 episodes/patient/year; p<0.001), but there was not differences in germs, admission rate and follow up. Mortality was higher in older 65years group (28.4% vs 9.4%) as expected. PD permanence probability was similar (2.1years). The main cause of PD withdrawal was transplant in group <65years (48.3%) and transfer to HD in group >65years. The main reason was caregiver or patient fatigue (20.2%), and not technique failure (7.3%). Multivariate Cox regression analysis showed a relation (HR [95%CI]) between mortality and age>65years 2.4 [1.9-3.0]; DM 1.6 [1.3-2.1]; CV events 2.1 [1.7-2.7]. Multivariate Cox regression analysis identify a relation between technique failure and age>65years 1.5 [1.3-1.9]; DM 1.6 [1.3-1.9] and previous transplant 1.5 [1.2-2.0]. CONCLUSION Patients older than 65years fulfilled PD adequacy criteria during the follow up. We believe PD is a valid option for patients older 65years. It is necessary to try to prevent infections and patient/caregiver fatigue, to avoid HD transfer for reasons not related to technique failure.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jose Portolés
- Servicio de Nefrología, H. Universitario Puerta de Hierro, Madrid, España; REDInREN RETIC ISCIII 016/009, España.
| | - Almudena Vega
- Servicio de Nefrología, H. Universitario Gregorio Marañón, Madrid, España; REDInREN RETIC ISCIII 016/009, España
| | - Enrique Lacoba
- Servicio de Nefrología, H. Universitario Puerta de Hierro, Madrid, España; REDInREN RETIC ISCIII 016/009, España
| | | | - Mario Botella
- Servicio de Nefrología, H. Universitario Puerta de Hierro, Madrid, España
| | - Claudia Yuste
- REDInREN RETIC ISCIII 016/009, España; Servicio de Nefrología, H. Universitario Doce de Octubre, Madrid, España
| | - Catalina Martín Cleary
- REDInREN RETIC ISCIII 016/009, España; Servicio de Nefrología, Fundación Jiménez Díaz, Madrid, España
| | | | | | | | - Agustín Carreño
- Servicio de Nefrología, H. Universitario Ciudad Real, Ciudad Real, España
| | - M Auxiliadora Bajo
- REDInREN RETIC ISCIII 016/009, España; Servicio de Nefrología, H. Universitario La Paz, Madrid, España
| | - Darío Janeiro
- Servicio de Nefrología, H. Universitario Puerta de Hierro, Madrid, España; REDInREN RETIC ISCIII 016/009, España
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
11
|
Hofmeister M, Klarenbach S, Soril L, Scott-Douglas N, Clement F. A Systematic Review and Jurisdictional Scan of the Evidence Characterizing and Evaluating Assisted Peritoneal Dialysis Models. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol 2020; 15:511-520. [PMID: 32188636 PMCID: PMC7133129 DOI: 10.2215/cjn.11951019] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/07/2019] [Accepted: 02/20/2020] [Indexed: 01/19/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES Compared with hemodialysis, home peritoneal dialysis alleviates the burden of travel, facilitates independence, and is less costly. Physical, cognitive, or psychosocial factors may preclude peritoneal dialysis in otherwise eligible patients. Assisted peritoneal dialysis, where trained personnel assist with home peritoneal dialysis, may be an option, but the optimal model is unknown. The objective of this work is to characterize existing assisted peritoneal dialysis models and synthesize clinical outcomes. DESIGN, SETTING, PARTICIPANTS, & MEASUREMENTS A systematic review of MEDLINE, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trails, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, Embase, PsycINFO, and CINAHL was conducted (search dates: January 1995-September 2018). A focused gray literature search was also completed, limited to developed nations. Included studies focused on home-based assisted peritoneal dialysis; studies with the assist provided exclusively by unpaid family caregivers were excluded. All outcomes were narratively synthesized; quantitative outcomes were graphically depicted. RESULTS We included 34 studies, totaling 46,597 patients, with assisted peritoneal dialysis programs identified in 20 jurisdictions. Two categories emerged for models of assisted peritoneal dialysis on the basis of type of assistance: health care and non-health care professional assistance. Reported outcomes were heterogeneous, ranging from patient-level outcomes of survival, to resource use and transfer to hemodialysis; however, the comparative effect of assisted peritoneal dialysis was unclear. In two qualitative studies examining the patient experience, the maintenance of independence was identified as an important theme. CONCLUSIONS Reported outcomes and quality were heterogeneous, and relative efficacy of assisted peritoneal dialysis could not be determined from included studies. Although the patient voice was under-represented, suggestions to improve assisted peritoneal dialysis included using a person-centered model of care, ensuring continuity of nurses providing the peritoneal dialysis assist, and measures to support patient independence. Although attractive elements of assisted peritoneal dialysis are identified, further evidence is needed to connect assisted peritoneal dialysis outcomes with programmatic features and their associated funding models.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mark Hofmeister
- Department of Community Health Sciences, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.,Health Technology Assessment Unit, O'Brien Institute for Public Health, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
| | - Scott Klarenbach
- Department of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
| | - Lesley Soril
- Department of Community Health Sciences, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.,Health Technology Assessment Unit, O'Brien Institute for Public Health, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
| | | | - Fiona Clement
- Department of Community Health Sciences, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada; .,Health Technology Assessment Unit, O'Brien Institute for Public Health, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Slon Roblero MF, Borman N, Bajo Rubio MA. Integrated care: enhancing transition from renal replacement therapy options to home haemodialysis. Clin Kidney J 2019; 13:105-110. [PMID: 32082558 PMCID: PMC7025339 DOI: 10.1093/ckj/sfz140] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/21/2019] [Accepted: 09/09/2019] [Indexed: 12/18/2022] Open
Abstract
Transition is an intrinsic process in the life of a patient with kidney disease and should be planned and anticipated when possible. A single therapy option might not be adequate across a patient’s entire lifespan and many patients will require a switch in their treatment modality to adapt the treatment to their clinical and psychosocial needs. There are several reasons behind changing a patient’s treatment modality, and the consequences of each decision should be evaluated, considering both short- and long-term benefits and risks. Dialysis modality transition is not only to allow for technical optimization or improved patient survival, the patient’s experience associated with the transition should also be taken into account. Transition should not be considered as treatment failure, but rather as an expected progression in the patient’s treatment options.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maria Fernanda Slon Roblero
- Department of Nephrology, Complejo Hospitalario Navarra, Navarre, Spain.,Cardiovascular Department, IdisNa, Navarre, Spain
| | - Natalie Borman
- Wessex Renal and Transplantation Unit, Queen Alexandra Hospital, Portsmouth, Portsmouth, UK
| | - Maria Auxiliadora Bajo Rubio
- Department of Nephrology, Hospital Universitario La Paz, Madrid, Spain.,Department of Nephrology, IdiPAZ, Madrid, Spain
| |
Collapse
|