Development and Clinical Application of a Prednisolone/Cortisol Assay to Determine Adherence to Maintenance Oral Prednisolone in Severe Asthma

BACKGROUND

Nonadherence to oral prednisolone is an important driver of poor control in severe asthma, and its detection is warranted to guide management.

RESEARCH QUESTION

The goal of this study was to evaluate the utility of liquid chromatography and tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) in determining the adherence status to oral prednisolone in severe asthma.

STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS

Timeline serum levels of prednisolone, cortisol, and metabolites were measured by using a validated LC-MS/MS assay following observed intake of prednisolone in patients receiving maintenance oral prednisolone. Patterns of adherence and nonadherence were determined from analysis of peak blood levels. The performance of a spot test for adherence (detectable prednisolone and suppressed cortisol) was assessed in a second cohort of patients receiving maintenance prednisolone and a control group.

RESULTS

In the prednisolone absorption test, 27 patients (mean age, 38.6 years; age range, 17-63 years; 83% female) were included. We identified adherence in 13 (48%), nonadherence in 13 (48%), and malabsorption in one (3.7%). The median [interquartile range] peak serum assays of the adherent group compared with the nonadherent group were: cortisol, 36 [39.5] vs 295 [153] nmol/L; and prednisolone, 1,810 [590] vs 1,730 [727] nmol/L. The spot test cohort included 111 patients (67 on maintenance prednisolone and 44 control subjects); the mean age was 42.4 years, and 79% were female. Nonadherence was detected in 40.3% of patients; comparison of the adherent vs nonadherent groups revealed median [interquartile range] levels for cortisol of 27 [48] nmol/L vs 211 [130] nmol/L and for prednisolone of 259 [622] nmol/L vs < 20 nmol/L, respectively. Adherent patients had higher mean BMI (38.4 ± 8.7 vs 32 ± 7.5 kg/m²; P = .03), lower median blood eosinophils (0.09 [0.31] vs 0.51 [0.53] × 10⁹/L; P < .001), and a trend toward reduced mean annual severe exacerbations (3.0 ± 2.6 vs 4.3 ± 2.4; P = .3) than nonadherent patients.

INTERPRETATION

Nonadherence to oral prednisolone is common in severe asthma and can be reliably detected in the clinic by using the LC-MS/MS assay.

Twenty-four hour urinary cortisol excretion and the metabolic syndrome in prednisolone-treated renal transplant recipients

Chronic prednisolone treatment in renal transplant recipients (RTR) causes metabolic abnormalities, which cluster in the metabolic syndrome (MS). It also suppresses the hypothalamic-pituitaryadrenal (HPA)-axis. We investigated whether HPA-axis suppression, as measured by 24h urinary cortisol excretion, is associated with presence of the MS and its individual components, in outpatient RTR with a functioning graft for >1year. Urinary cortisol was measured in 24h urine, using LC-MS/MS (LOQ 0.30nmol/L). We included 563 RTR (age 51±12years; 54% male) at median 6.0 [IQR, 2.6-11.5] years post-transplantation. MS was present in 439/563 RTR (78%). Median 24h urinary cortisol excretion was 2.0 [IQR, 0.9-5.1]nmol/24h. Twenty-four hour urinary cortisol excretion was independently associated with MS presence (OR=0.80 [95% CI, 0.66-0.98], P=0.02). It was also independently associated with bodyweight (st.β=-0.11, P=0.007), waist circumference (st.β=-0.10, P=0.01), BMI (st.β=-0.14, P=0.001), fasting triglycerides (st.β=-0.15, P=0.001), diabetes (st.β=-0.12, P=0.005), and number of antihypertensives used (st.β=-0.13, P=0.003). Suppressed HPA-axis activity, as reflected by decreased 24h urinary cortisol excretion, is associated with higher prevalence of MS and its individual components (i.e. central obesity, dyslipidemia, diabetes, hypertension) in prednisolone-treated RTR. Assessment of 24h urinary cortisol excretion by LC-MS/MS may be a tool to monitor metabolic side-effects of prednisolone in RTR.

Pharmacokinetics of total and unbound prednisone and prednisolone in stable kidney transplant recipients with diabetes mellitus

BACKGROUND

The corticosteroid prednisone is an important component of posttransplantation immunosuppressive therapy. Pharmacokinetic parameters of prednisone or its pharmacologically active metabolite, prednisolone, are not well characterized in transplant recipients. The objective of this study was to compare the pharmacokinetics of total and unbound prednisone and prednisolone in diabetic and nondiabetic stable kidney transplant recipients and to evaluate the factors influencing plasma protein binding of prednisolone.

METHODS

Prednisone and prednisolone concentration-time profiles were obtained in 20 diabetic and 18 nondiabetic stable kidney transplant recipients receiving an oral dose of 5-10 mg prednisone per day. In addition to drug and metabolite exposures, factors influencing prednisolone protein binding were evaluated using a nonlinear mixed-effects modeling approach. This model takes into account the binding of prednisolone and cortisol to corticosteroid-binding globulin (CBG) in a saturable fashion and binding of prednisolone to albumin in a nonsaturable fashion. Finally, we have investigated the influence of several covariates including diabetes, glucose concentration, hemoglobin A1c, creatinine clearance, body mass index, gender, age, and time after transplantation on the affinity constant (K) between corticosteroids and their binding proteins.

RESULTS

In patients with diabetes, the values of dose-normalized area under the concentration-time curves were 27% and 23% higher for total and unbound prednisolone, respectively. Moreover, the ratio of total prednisolone to prednisone concentrations (active/inactive forms) was higher in diabetic subjects (P < 0.001). Modeling protein binding results revealed that the affinity constant of corticosteroid-binding globulin-prednisolone (KCBG,PL) was related to the patient's gender and diabetes status.

CONCLUSIONS

Higher prednisolone exposure could potentially lead to the increased risk of corticosteroid-related complications in diabetic kidney transplant recipients.

High-performance liquid chromatographic analysis of corticosteroids

This review presents recent developments in high-performance liquid chromatographic (HPLC) analysis of corticosteroids for the determination of clinically important steroids in biological specimens. Various sample preparation techniques are described.

Cortisol pharmacodynamic response to long-term methylprednisolone in renal transplant recipients

STUDY OBJECTIVE

To examine the pharmacodynamic patterns of cortisol and pharmacokinetic values of long-term methylprednisolone in renal transplant recipients.

DESIGN

Twenty-four-hour pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic evaluation of patients who participated in a glucocorticoid-monitoring program.

SETTING

University-based renal transplant clinic.

PATIENTS

Fourteen renal transplant recipients studied during a clinically stable period.

INTERVENTIONS

The daily oral methylprednisolone dose for each patient was administered intravenously, and serial plasma cortisol and methylprednisolone samples were obtained over 24 hours.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

Methylprednisolone was analyzed by high-performance liquid chromatography. The baseline morning cortisol serum concentrations ranged from 9.8-210.7 ng/ml. After the drug was administered, cortisol declined in a linear fashion with a mean suppression half-life of 2.4 +/- 0.9 hours. The cortisol nadir was reached at 12-16 hours in 11 of 14 patients. The return cortisol area under the curve (AUC-Cret) was noted in all patients and ranged from 57-987 ng.hr/ml. The total cortisol area under the curve was greater in patients who had been transplanted for longer than 2 years (1676 +/- 252 vs 836 +/- 405 ng.hr/ml; p < 0.05) compared with more recently transplanted patients. Methylprednisolone clearance ranged from 100-1181 ml/hr/kg with a mean volume of distribution of 1.3 +/- 0.6 L/kg. The methylprednisolone half-life ranged from 1.2-4.7 hours. The correlation between AUC-Cret and methylprednisolone AUC was -0.64 (p < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

The pharmacodynamic response of cortisol in renal transplant recipients may be associated in part with long-term steroid exposure. However, the interrelationship between the endocrine and immune system may also affect cortisol's disposition and subsequent recovery patterns in this population. Considerable interpatient variability was apparent in both the cortisol pharmacodynamic response as well as the pharmacokinetics of methylprednisolone. These findings suggest a more individualized dosing method may be necessary to optimize the immunosuppressive effect of glucocorticoids and minimize clinical toxicity.

Impaired prednisolone sensitivities of the endocrine system and peripheral-blood lymphocytes are closely related to clinical incidence in renal transplantation

Endocrine- and immune-responses to prednisolone and their relation to clinical incidence were assessed in 19 renal transplant recipients. All of the patients were treated with prednisolone and cyclosporin. Response of the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal (HPA) system to prednisolone was evaluated by measuring serum cortisol concentration. Cortisol concentration before transplantation was 126.7 +/- 38.6 ng mL-1, while it decreased to 4.1 +/- 2.5 ng mL-1 within the period characterized by a cumulative dose of prednisolone from 300 to 700 mg. A statistically significant high incidence (P less than 0.01) of acute rejections was observed in low HPA responders; (mean cortisol concentration during prednisolone treatment exceeded 3.0 ng mL-1), 6 of 12 with a low HPA response to prednisolone showed signs of rejection, while none of the 7 with a high HPA response showed signs of rejection. The concentrations of prednisolone suppressing the in-vitro response of pretransplant lymphocytes to concanavalin A by 50% (ID50) were determined. Lymphocytes from 8 patients were extremely insensitive (ID50 greater than 500 ng mL-1), and 5 of the 8 showed signs of rejection. Lymphocytes from the other 11 patients showed high sensitivity (ID50 less than 500 ng mL-1), and only one of those showed signs of rejection. Thus, a significantly high incidence of rejection was observed in low lymphocyte-responders to prednisolone (P less than 0.05). The results suggest that an insensitive endocrine response to prednisolone correlates with an impaired lymphocyte response to the steroid, and that both of the indices are related to occurrence of rejection. Evaluation of these pharmacodynamic parameters in combination may serve as a guideline for successful immunosuppressive therapy in renal transplantation.

Role of altered prednisolone-specific lymphocyte sensitivity in chronic renal failure as a pharmacodynamic marker of acute allograft rejection after kidney transplantation

The effects of four immunosuppressive agents on the in vitro blastogenesis of peripheral blood lymphocytes activated by concanavalin A have been studied using cells from 26 healthy subjects, 34 patients with chronic renal failure (CRF) and 30 kidney transplant recipients. Differences in lymphocyte sensitivity to prednisolone between the healthy subjects and the CRF patients were statistically significant (P less than 0.0002), with impaired sensitivity in CRF. Impaired lymphocyte sensitivity occurred in 3.8% and 52.9% of the healthy and CRF subjects, respectively. Lymphocyte sensitivity to prednisolone, both preoperatively and 3 months post-operatively, was strongly correlated with early allograft rejection during co-administration of prednisolone with cyclosporin or azathioprine. Lymphocyte sensitivity to cyclosporin, azathioprine, and mizoribine in CRF was not significantly less than that in healthy subjects. Since the pharmacokinetics of prednisolone are little altered in renal transplantation, it is concluded that lymphocyte sensitivity specific to prednisolone may be a pharmacodynamic marker characteristic of successful graft survival in patients with histo-incompatibility and/or drug resistance.