Effect of ambient temperature on analytical performance of self-monitoring blood glucose systems

BACKGROUND

The analytical quality of self-monitoring of blood glucose (SMBG) can be affected by environmental conditions such as temperature. The objective of this study was to determine the influence of (1) a shift in the ambient temperature immediately before measurement and (2) taking measurements in the lower and upper part of the operating temperature range.

METHODS

Nine different SMBG systems on the Norwegian market were tested with heparinized venous blood (4.8 and 19.0 mmol/L). To test the shift in ambient temperature effect, the glucometer and strips were equilibrated for 1 h at 5°C or 1 h at 30°C before the meter and strips were moved to room temperature, and measurements were performed after 0, 5, 10, 15, and 30 min. To test the lower and upper temperature range, measurements were performed at 10°C and at 39°C after 1 h for temperature equilibration of the glucometer and strips. All these measurements were compared with measurements performed simultaneously on a meter and strips kept at room temperature the whole time.

RESULTS

Six of nine SMBG systems overestimated and/or underestimated the results by more than 5% after moving meters and strips from 5°C or 30°C to room temperature immediately before the measurements. Two systems underestimated the results at 10°C. One system overestimated and another underestimated the results by more than 5% at 39°C.

CONCLUSIONS

The effect on analytical performance was most pronounced after a rapid shift in the ambient temperature. Therefore patients need to wait at least 15 min for temperature equilibration of affected meters and strips before measuring blood glucose.

Effect of ambient temperature and humidity on performance of blood glucose meters

The accuracy of four blood glucose meters (Accutrend, ExacTech Companion, Medisense Companion 2, and Glucometer III) was tested at temperatures ranging from 4 to 44 degrees C (control solutions) and 8 degrees C, 24 degrees C, and 36 degrees C (venous blood) and at humidities of 60% and 80%. Low and high temperatures resulted in a number of statistically significant changes in glucose readings with all meters. However, Accutrend, Medisense Companion 2, and Glucometer III were 100% clinically accurate at all temperatures. With the ExacTech Companion, only 70.8% of control solution and 55.6% of venous blood results were clinically accurate. The main errors were: (1) cold temperatures lowered the result so that euglycaemic levels erroneously read in the hypoglycaemic range and hyperglycaemic levels gave a better than actual result and (2) hot temperatures increased the result whereby hypoglycaemic levels falsely gave a euglycaemic result. Weather conditions at which blood glucose meters may be operated can affect results and potentially lead to errors in clinical decisions.

Variations in sample pH and pO2 affect ExacTech meter glucose measurements

A study was conducted to assess the effect of changes in sample pH and pO2 on the Accutrend, ExacTech Companion, Glucometer II, One Touch II, and Refloflux II blood glucose meters. Venous blood was tonometered after the addition of strong acid or alkali to produce 10 samples with a pH range of 6.54 to 7.73 but with a similar mean pO2 (9.09 +/- 0.096 (SEM) kPa) and pCO2 (5.52 +/- 0.024 kPa). The ExacTech showed a > 15% deviation from the value obtained at pH 7.40 below pH 6.95 and above pH 7.85 (r = 0.69, p = 0.026). Ten further samples were made with a pO2 range of 2.0 to 33.6 kPa but mean pH (7.28 +/- 0.012) and pCO2 (7.98 +/- 0.25 kPa) kept alike. The ExacTech was accurate at pO2 = 11.5 kPa but deviated by > 15% below pO2 = 5.8 kPa and above 22.9 kPa (r = -0.95, p = 0.00002). The Accutrend and One Touch II required a pO2 change of 42 and 45 kPa to achieve the same error (r = -0.82 and r = -0.67 respectively). Thus caution is required in the interpretation of ExacTech glucose measurements in severely acidotic or hypoxic patients.