1
|
Weiss S, Lamy P, Rusan M, Nørgaard M, Ulhøi BP, Knudsen M, Kassentoft CG, Farajzadeh L, Jensen JB, Pedersen JS, Borre M, Sørensen KD. Exploring the tumor genomic landscape of aggressive prostate cancer by whole-genome sequencing of tissue or liquid biopsies. Int J Cancer 2024; 155:298-313. [PMID: 38602058 DOI: 10.1002/ijc.34949] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/15/2023] [Revised: 01/19/2024] [Accepted: 03/12/2024] [Indexed: 04/12/2024]
Abstract
Treatment resistance remains a major issue in aggressive prostate cancer (PC), and novel genomic biomarkers may guide better treatment selection. Circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) can provide minimally invasive information about tumor genomes, but the genomic landscape of aggressive PC based on whole-genome sequencing (WGS) of ctDNA remains incompletely characterized. Thus, we here performed WGS of tumor tissue (n = 31) or plasma ctDNA (n = 10) from a total of 41 aggressive PC patients, including 11 hormone-naïve, 15 hormone-sensitive, and 15 castration-resistant patients. Across all variant types, we found progressively more altered tumor genomic profiles in later stages of aggressive PC. The potential driver genes most frequently affected by single-nucleotide variants or insertions/deletions included the known PC-related genes TP53, CDK12, and PTEN and the novel genes COL13A1, KCNH3, and SENP3. Etiologically, aggressive PC was associated with age-related and DNA repair-related mutational signatures. Copy number variants most frequently affected 14q11.2 and 8p21.2, where no well-recognized PC-related genes are located, and also frequently affected regions near the known PC-related genes MYC, AR, TP53, PTEN, and BRCA1. Structural variants most frequently involved not only the known PC-related genes TMPRSS2 and ERG but also the less extensively studied gene in this context, PTPRD. Finally, clinically actionable variants were detected throughout all stages of aggressive PC and in both plasma and tissue samples, emphasizing the potential clinical applicability of WGS of minimally invasive plasma samples. Overall, our study highlights the feasibility of using liquid biopsies for comprehensive genomic characterization as an alternative to tissue biopsies in advanced/aggressive PC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Simone Weiss
- Department of Molecular Medicine, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
- Department of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Philippe Lamy
- Department of Molecular Medicine, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Maria Rusan
- Department of Molecular Medicine, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
- Department of Clinical Immunology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Maibritt Nørgaard
- Department of Molecular Medicine, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
- Department of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark
| | | | - Michael Knudsen
- Department of Molecular Medicine, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
| | | | | | - Jørgen Bjerggaard Jensen
- Department of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark
- Department of Urology, Gødstrup Hospital, Gødstrup, Denmark
| | - Jakob Skou Pedersen
- Department of Molecular Medicine, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
- Department of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark
- Bioinformatics Research Centre, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Michael Borre
- Department of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark
- Department of Urology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Karina Dalsgaard Sørensen
- Department of Molecular Medicine, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
- Department of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Kluge K, Einspieler H, Haberl D, Spielvogel C, Amereller D, Egger G, Kramer G, Grubmüller B, Shariat S, Hacker M, Kenner L, Haug A. Comparison of discovery rates and prognostic utility of [ 68Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT and circulating tumor DNA in prostate cancer-a cross-sectional study. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2024; 51:2833-2842. [PMID: 38693454 PMCID: PMC11224100 DOI: 10.1007/s00259-024-06698-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/06/2024] [Accepted: 03/20/2024] [Indexed: 05/03/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Circulating-tumor DNA (ctDNA) and prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) ligand positron-emission tomography (PET) enable minimal-invasive prostate cancer (PCa) detection and survival prognostication. The present study aims to compare their tumor discovery abilities and prognostic values. METHODS One hundred thirty men with confirmed PCa (70.5 ± 8.0 years) who underwent [68Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT (184.8 ± 19.7 MBq) imaging and plasma sample collection (March 2019-August 2021) were included. Plasma-extracted cell-free DNA was subjected to whole-genome-based ctDNA analysis. PSMA-positive tumor lesions were delineated and their quantitative parameters extracted. ctDNA and PSMA PET/CT discovery rates were compared, and the prognostic value for overall survival (OS) was evaluated. RESULTS PSMA PET discovery rates according to castration status and PSA ranges did differ significantly (P = 0.013, P < 0.001), while ctDNA discovery rates did not (P = 0.311, P = 0.123). ctDNA discovery rates differed between localized and metastatic disease (P = 0.013). Correlations between ctDNA concentrations and PSMA-positive tumor volume (PSMA-TV) were significant in all (r = 0.42, P < 0.001) and castration-resistant (r = 0.65, P < 0.001), however not in hormone-sensitive patients (r = 0.15, P = 0.249). PSMA-TV and ctDNA levels were associated with survival outcomes in the Logrank (P < 0.0001, P < 0.0001) and multivariate Cox regression analysis (P = 0.0023, P < 0.0001). CONCLUSION These findings suggest that PSMA PET imaging outperforms ctDNA analysis in detecting prostate cancer across the whole spectrum of disease, while both modalities are independently highly prognostic for survival outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kilian Kluge
- Department of Biomedical Imaging and Image-Guided Therapy, Division of Nuclear Medicine, Medical University of Vienna, Währinger Gürtel 18-20, 1090, Vienna, Austria
- Christian Doppler Laboratory for Applied Metabolomics (CDL AM), Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Holger Einspieler
- Department of Biomedical Imaging and Image-Guided Therapy, Division of Nuclear Medicine, Medical University of Vienna, Währinger Gürtel 18-20, 1090, Vienna, Austria
| | - David Haberl
- Department of Biomedical Imaging and Image-Guided Therapy, Division of Nuclear Medicine, Medical University of Vienna, Währinger Gürtel 18-20, 1090, Vienna, Austria
- Christian Doppler Laboratory for Applied Metabolomics (CDL AM), Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Clemens Spielvogel
- Department of Biomedical Imaging and Image-Guided Therapy, Division of Nuclear Medicine, Medical University of Vienna, Währinger Gürtel 18-20, 1090, Vienna, Austria
- Christian Doppler Laboratory for Applied Metabolomics (CDL AM), Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Dominik Amereller
- Department of Biomedical Imaging and Image-Guided Therapy, Division of Nuclear Medicine, Medical University of Vienna, Währinger Gürtel 18-20, 1090, Vienna, Austria
| | - Gerda Egger
- Department of Pathology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Gero Kramer
- Department of Urology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Bernhard Grubmüller
- Department of Urology and Andrology, University Hospital Krems, Krems, Austria
- Karl Landsteiner University of Health Sciences, Krems, Austria
| | - Shahrokh Shariat
- Department of Urology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
- Karl Landsteiner Institute of Urology and Andrology, Vienna, Austria
- Department of Urology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA
- Department of Special Surgery, Division of Urology, The University of Jordan, Amman, Jordan
- Department of Urology, Second Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic
- Department of Urology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA
| | - Marcus Hacker
- Department of Biomedical Imaging and Image-Guided Therapy, Division of Nuclear Medicine, Medical University of Vienna, Währinger Gürtel 18-20, 1090, Vienna, Austria
| | - Lukas Kenner
- Christian Doppler Laboratory for Applied Metabolomics (CDL AM), Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
- Department of Pathology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Alexander Haug
- Department of Biomedical Imaging and Image-Guided Therapy, Division of Nuclear Medicine, Medical University of Vienna, Währinger Gürtel 18-20, 1090, Vienna, Austria.
- Christian Doppler Laboratory for Applied Metabolomics (CDL AM), Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Myers MA, Arnold BJ, Bansal V, Balaban M, Mullen KM, Zaccaria S, Raphael BJ. HATCHet2: clone- and haplotype-specific copy number inference from bulk tumor sequencing data. Genome Biol 2024; 25:130. [PMID: 38773520 PMCID: PMC11110434 DOI: 10.1186/s13059-024-03267-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/13/2023] [Accepted: 05/03/2024] [Indexed: 05/24/2024] Open
Abstract
Bulk DNA sequencing of multiple samples from the same tumor is becoming common, yet most methods to infer copy-number aberrations (CNAs) from this data analyze individual samples independently. We introduce HATCHet2, an algorithm to identify haplotype- and clone-specific CNAs simultaneously from multiple bulk samples. HATCHet2 extends the earlier HATCHet method by improving identification of focal CNAs and introducing a novel statistic, the minor haplotype B-allele frequency (mhBAF), that enables identification of mirrored-subclonal CNAs. We demonstrate HATCHet2's improved accuracy using simulations and a single-cell sequencing dataset. HATCHet2 analysis of 10 prostate cancer patients reveals previously unreported mirrored-subclonal CNAs affecting cancer genes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Matthew A Myers
- Department of Computer Science, Princeton University, Princeton, USA
| | - Brian J Arnold
- Center for Statistics and Machine Learning, Princeton University, Princeton, USA
| | - Vineet Bansal
- Princeton Research Computing, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ, USA
| | - Metin Balaban
- Department of Computer Science, Princeton University, Princeton, USA
| | - Katelyn M Mullen
- Human Oncology & Pathogenesis Program, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Simone Zaccaria
- Computational Cancer Genomics Research Group, University College London Cancer Institute, London, UK.
| | | |
Collapse
|
4
|
Sogbe M, Bilbao I, Marchese FP, Zazpe J, De Vito A, Pozuelo M, D’Avola D, Iñarrairaegui M, Berasain C, Arechederra M, Argemi J, Sangro B. Prognostic value of ultra-low-pass whole-genome sequencing of circulating tumor DNA in hepatocellular carcinoma under systemic treatment. Clin Mol Hepatol 2024; 30:177-190. [PMID: 38163441 PMCID: PMC11016491 DOI: 10.3350/cmh.2023.0426] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/24/2023] [Revised: 12/14/2023] [Accepted: 12/27/2023] [Indexed: 01/03/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND/AIMS New prognostic markers are needed to identify patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) who carry a worse prognosis. Ultra-low-pass whole-genome sequencing (ULP-WGS) (≤0.5× coverage) of cell-free DNA (cfDNA) has emerged as a low-cost promising tool to assess both circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) fraction and large structural genomic alterations. Here, we studied the performance of ULP-WGS of plasma cfDNA to infer prognosis in patients with HCC. METHODS Plasma samples were obtained from patients with HCC prior to surgery, locoregional or systemic therapy, and were analyzed by ULP-WGS of cfDNA to an average genome-wide fold coverage of 0.3x. ctDNA and copy number alterations (CNA) were estimated using the software package ichorCNA. RESULTS Samples were obtained from 73 HCC patients at different BCLC stages (BCLC 0/A: n=37, 50.7%; BCLC B/C: n=36, 49.3%). ctDNA was detected in 18 out of 31 patients who received systemic treatment. Patients with detectable ctDNA showed significantly worse overall survival (median, 13.96 months vs not reached). ctDNA remained an independent predictor of prognosis after adjustment by clinical-pathologic features and type of systemic treatment (hazard ratio 7.69; 95%, CI 2.09-28.27). Among ctDNA-positive patients under systemic treatments, the loss of large genomic regions in 5q and 16q arms was associated with worse prognosis after multivariate analysis. CONCLUSION ULP-WGS of cfDNA provides clinically relevant information about the tumor biology. The presence of ctDNA and the loss of 5q and 16q arms in ctDNA-positive patients are independent predictors of worse prognosis in patients with advanced HCC receiving systemic therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Miguel Sogbe
- Clinica Universidad de Navarra, Liver Unit, Pamplona, Spain
| | - Idoia Bilbao
- Clinica Universidad de Navarra, Liver Unit, Pamplona, Spain
| | - Francesco P. Marchese
- University of Navarra, Center for Applied Medical Research (CIMA), Computational Biology and Translational Genomics Program, Pamplona, Spain
- Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria de Navarra (IdiSNA), Pamplona, Spain
| | - Jon Zazpe
- University of Navarra, Center for Applied Medical Research (CIMA), Computational Biology and Translational Genomics Program, Pamplona, Spain
- Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria de Navarra (IdiSNA), Pamplona, Spain
| | - Annarosaria De Vito
- University of Navarra, Center for Applied Medical Research (CIMA), Computational Biology and Translational Genomics Program, Pamplona, Spain
- Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria de Navarra (IdiSNA), Pamplona, Spain
| | - Marta Pozuelo
- University of Navarra, Center for Applied Medical Research (CIMA), Computational Biology and Translational Genomics Program, Pamplona, Spain
- Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria de Navarra (IdiSNA), Pamplona, Spain
| | - Delia D’Avola
- Clinica Universidad de Navarra, Internal Medicine Department, Madrid, Spain
- Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Enfermedades Hepáticas y Digestivas (CIBEREHD), Pamplona, Spain
| | - Mercedes Iñarrairaegui
- Clinica Universidad de Navarra, Liver Unit, Pamplona, Spain
- Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria de Navarra (IdiSNA), Pamplona, Spain
- Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Enfermedades Hepáticas y Digestivas (CIBEREHD), Pamplona, Spain
| | - Carmen Berasain
- Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Enfermedades Hepáticas y Digestivas (CIBEREHD), Pamplona, Spain
- University of Navarra, Center for Applied Medical Research (CIMA), Hepatology Laboratory, Solid Tumors Program, Pamplona, Spain
| | - Maria Arechederra
- Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria de Navarra (IdiSNA), Pamplona, Spain
- Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Enfermedades Hepáticas y Digestivas (CIBEREHD), Pamplona, Spain
- University of Navarra, Center for Applied Medical Research (CIMA), Hepatology Laboratory, Solid Tumors Program, Pamplona, Spain
| | - Josepmaria Argemi
- Clinica Universidad de Navarra, Liver Unit, Pamplona, Spain
- Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria de Navarra (IdiSNA), Pamplona, Spain
- Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Enfermedades Hepáticas y Digestivas (CIBEREHD), Pamplona, Spain
- University of Navarra, Center for Applied Medical Research (CIMA), Hepatology Laboratory, Solid Tumors Program, Pamplona, Spain
| | - Bruno Sangro
- Clinica Universidad de Navarra, Liver Unit, Pamplona, Spain
- Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria de Navarra (IdiSNA), Pamplona, Spain
- Clinica Universidad de Navarra, Liver Unit, Madrid, Spain
- Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Enfermedades Hepáticas y Digestivas (CIBEREHD), Pamplona, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Han JE, Cho HJ. Exploring the prognostic value of ultra-low-pass whole-genome sequencing of circulating tumor DNA in hepatocellular carcinoma. Clin Mol Hepatol 2024; 30:160-163. [PMID: 38414374 PMCID: PMC11016494 DOI: 10.3350/cmh.2024.0141] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/22/2024] [Accepted: 02/24/2024] [Indexed: 02/29/2024] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Ji Eun Han
- Department of Gastroenterology, Ajou University School of Medicine, Suwon, Korea
| | - Hyo Jung Cho
- Department of Gastroenterology, Ajou University School of Medicine, Suwon, Korea
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Vandekerkhove G, Giri VN, Halabi S, McNair C, Hamade K, Bitting RL, Wyatt AW. Toward Informed Selection and Interpretation of Clinical Genomic Tests in Prostate Cancer. JCO Precis Oncol 2024; 8:e2300654. [PMID: 38547422 PMCID: PMC10994438 DOI: 10.1200/po.23.00654] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/24/2023] [Revised: 12/15/2023] [Accepted: 02/07/2024] [Indexed: 04/02/2024] Open
Abstract
Clinical genomic testing of patient germline, tumor tissue, or plasma cell-free DNA can enable a personalized approach to cancer management and treatment. In prostate cancer (PCa), broad genotyping tests are now widely used to identify germline and/or somatic alterations in BRCA2 and other DNA damage repair genes. Alterations in these genes can confer cancer sensitivity to poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitors, are linked with poor prognosis, and can have potential hereditary cancer implications for family members. However, there is huge variability in genomic tests and reporting standards, meaning that for successful implementation of testing in clinical practice, end users must carefully select the most appropriate test for a given patient and critically interpret the results. In this white paper, we outline key pre- and post-test considerations for choosing a genomic test and evaluating reported variants, specifically for patients with advanced PCa. Test choice must be based on clinical context and disease state, availability and suitability of tumor tissue, and the genes and regions that are covered by the test. We describe strategies to recognize false positives or negatives in test results, including frameworks to assess low tumor fraction, subclonal alterations, clonal hematopoiesis, and pathogenic versus nonpathogenic variants. We assume that improved understanding among health care professionals and researchers of the nuances associated with genomic testing will ultimately lead to optimal patient care and clinical decision making.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gillian Vandekerkhove
- Vancouver Prostate Centre, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
- Department of Medical Oncology, BC Cancer, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Veda N. Giri
- Yale School of Medicine and Yale Cancer Center, New Haven, CT
| | | | | | | | | | - Alexander W. Wyatt
- Vancouver Prostate Centre, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
- Michael Smith Genome Sciences Centre, BC Cancer, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Fonseca NM, Maurice-Dror C, Herberts C, Tu W, Fan W, Murtha AJ, Kollmannsberger C, Kwan EM, Parekh K, Schönlau E, Bernales CQ, Donnellan G, Ng SWS, Sumiyoshi T, Vergidis J, Noonan K, Finch DL, Zulfiqar M, Miller S, Parimi S, Lavoie JM, Hardy E, Soleimani M, Nappi L, Eigl BJ, Kollmannsberger C, Taavitsainen S, Nykter M, Tolmeijer SH, Boerrigter E, Mehra N, van Erp NP, De Laere B, Lindberg J, Grönberg H, Khalaf DJ, Annala M, Chi KN, Wyatt AW. Prediction of plasma ctDNA fraction and prognostic implications of liquid biopsy in advanced prostate cancer. Nat Commun 2024; 15:1828. [PMID: 38418825 PMCID: PMC10902374 DOI: 10.1038/s41467-024-45475-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/21/2023] [Accepted: 01/24/2024] [Indexed: 03/02/2024] Open
Abstract
No consensus strategies exist for prognosticating metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC). Circulating tumor DNA fraction (ctDNA%) is increasingly reported by commercial and laboratory tests but its utility for risk stratification is unclear. Here, we intersect ctDNA%, treatment outcomes, and clinical characteristics across 738 plasma samples from 491 male mCRPC patients from two randomized multicentre phase II trials and a prospective province-wide blood biobanking program. ctDNA% correlates with serum and radiographic metrics of disease burden and is highest in patients with liver metastases. ctDNA% strongly predicts overall survival, progression-free survival, and treatment response independent of therapeutic context and outperformed established prognostic clinical factors. Recognizing that ctDNA-based biomarker genotyping is limited by low ctDNA% in some patients, we leverage the relationship between clinical prognostic factors and ctDNA% to develop a clinically-interpretable machine-learning tool that predicts whether a patient has sufficient ctDNA% for informative ctDNA genotyping (available online: https://www.ctDNA.org ). Our results affirm ctDNA% as an actionable tool for patient risk stratification and provide a practical framework for optimized biomarker testing.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nicolette M Fonseca
- Vancouver Prostate Centre, Department of Urologic Sciences, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | | | - Cameron Herberts
- Vancouver Prostate Centre, Department of Urologic Sciences, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Wilson Tu
- Vancouver Prostate Centre, Department of Urologic Sciences, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - William Fan
- Department of Medical Oncology, BC Cancer, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Andrew J Murtha
- Vancouver Prostate Centre, Department of Urologic Sciences, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | | | - Edmond M Kwan
- Vancouver Prostate Centre, Department of Urologic Sciences, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
- Department of Medical Oncology, BC Cancer, Vancouver, BC, Canada
- Department of Medicine, School of Clinical Sciences; Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Karan Parekh
- Vancouver Prostate Centre, Department of Urologic Sciences, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Elena Schönlau
- Vancouver Prostate Centre, Department of Urologic Sciences, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Cecily Q Bernales
- Vancouver Prostate Centre, Department of Urologic Sciences, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Gráinne Donnellan
- Vancouver Prostate Centre, Department of Urologic Sciences, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Sarah W S Ng
- Vancouver Prostate Centre, Department of Urologic Sciences, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Takayuki Sumiyoshi
- Vancouver Prostate Centre, Department of Urologic Sciences, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
- Department of Urology, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan
| | - Joanna Vergidis
- Department of Medical Oncology, BC Cancer, Victoria, BC, Canada
| | - Krista Noonan
- Department of Medical Oncology, BC Cancer, Surrey, BC, Canada
| | - Daygen L Finch
- Department of Medical Oncology, BC Cancer, Kelowna, BC, Canada
| | | | - Stacy Miller
- Department of Radiation Oncology, BC Cancer, Prince George, BC, Canada
| | - Sunil Parimi
- Department of Medical Oncology, BC Cancer, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | | | - Edward Hardy
- Tom McMurtry & Peter Baerg Cancer Centre, Vernon Jubilee Hospital, Vernon, BC, Canada
| | - Maryam Soleimani
- Department of Medical Oncology, BC Cancer, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Lucia Nappi
- Vancouver Prostate Centre, Department of Urologic Sciences, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
- Department of Medical Oncology, BC Cancer, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Bernhard J Eigl
- Department of Medical Oncology, BC Cancer, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | | | - Sinja Taavitsainen
- Prostate Cancer Research Center, Faculty of Medicine and Health Technology, Tampere University and Tays Cancer Center, Tampere, Finland
| | - Matti Nykter
- Prostate Cancer Research Center, Faculty of Medicine and Health Technology, Tampere University and Tays Cancer Center, Tampere, Finland
| | - Sofie H Tolmeijer
- Vancouver Prostate Centre, Department of Urologic Sciences, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
- Department of Medical Oncology, Research Institute for Medical Innovation, Radboud University, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Emmy Boerrigter
- Department of Pharmacy, Research Institute for Medical Innovation, Radboud University, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Niven Mehra
- Department of Medical Oncology, Research Institute for Medical Innovation, Radboud University, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Nielka P van Erp
- Department of Pharmacy, Research Institute for Medical Innovation, Radboud University, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Bram De Laere
- Department of Human Structure and Repair, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium
- Cancer Research Institute Ghent (CRIG), Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium
- Department of Medical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Johan Lindberg
- Department of Medical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Henrik Grönberg
- Department of Medical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Daniel J Khalaf
- Department of Medical Oncology, BC Cancer, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Matti Annala
- Vancouver Prostate Centre, Department of Urologic Sciences, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
- Prostate Cancer Research Center, Faculty of Medicine and Health Technology, Tampere University and Tays Cancer Center, Tampere, Finland.
| | - Kim N Chi
- Vancouver Prostate Centre, Department of Urologic Sciences, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
- Department of Medical Oncology, BC Cancer, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
| | - Alexander W Wyatt
- Vancouver Prostate Centre, Department of Urologic Sciences, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
- Michael Smith Genome Sciences Centre, BC Cancer, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Melton CA, Freese P, Zhou Y, Shenoy A, Bagaria S, Chang C, Kuo CC, Scott E, Srinivasan S, Cann G, Roychowdhury-Saha M, Chang PY, Singh AH. A Novel Tissue-Free Method to Estimate Tumor-Derived Cell-Free DNA Quantity Using Tumor Methylation Patterns. Cancers (Basel) 2023; 16:82. [PMID: 38201510 PMCID: PMC10777919 DOI: 10.3390/cancers16010082] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/07/2023] [Revised: 12/07/2023] [Accepted: 12/20/2023] [Indexed: 01/12/2024] Open
Abstract
Estimating the abundance of cell-free DNA (cfDNA) fragments shed from a tumor (i.e., circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA)) can approximate tumor burden, which has numerous clinical applications. We derived a novel, broadly applicable statistical method to quantify cancer-indicative methylation patterns within cfDNA to estimate ctDNA abundance, even at low levels. Our algorithm identified differentially methylated regions (DMRs) between a reference database of cancer tissue biopsy samples and cfDNA from individuals without cancer. Then, without utilizing matched tissue biopsy, counts of fragments matching the cancer-indicative hyper/hypo-methylated patterns within DMRs were used to determine a tumor methylated fraction (TMeF; a methylation-based quantification of the circulating tumor allele fraction and estimate of ctDNA abundance) for plasma samples. TMeF and small variant allele fraction (SVAF) estimates of the same cancer plasma samples were correlated (Spearman's correlation coefficient: 0.73), and synthetic dilutions to expected TMeF of 10-3 and 10-4 had estimated TMeF within two-fold for 95% and 77% of samples, respectively. TMeF increased with cancer stage and tumor size and inversely correlated with survival probability. Therefore, tumor-derived fragments in the cfDNA of patients with cancer can be leveraged to estimate ctDNA abundance without the need for a tumor biopsy, which may provide non-invasive clinical approximations of tumor burden.
Collapse
|
9
|
Salachan PV, Ulhøi BP, Borre M, Sørensen KD. Association between copy number alterations estimated using low-pass whole genome sequencing of formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded prostate tumor tissue and cancer-specific clinical parameters. Sci Rep 2023; 13:22445. [PMID: 38105358 PMCID: PMC10725894 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-023-49811-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/22/2023] [Accepted: 12/12/2023] [Indexed: 12/19/2023] Open
Abstract
Copy number alterations (CNAs) are frequently observed in early-stage prostate cancer and are associated with disease recurrence and tumor aggressiveness. Cost-effective assessment of CNAs could enhance clinical utility of CNAs. Here, we combined the cost-effectiveness of low-pass (low coverage) whole genome sequencing (LPWGS) and the routine availability of formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE) tumor tissue for assessing CNAs in a cohort of 187 men with early-stage localised prostate cancer. We detected well known CNAs in 8p, 8q, 13q and 16q and recurrent gains of the oncogene MYC and losses of the tumor suppressor genes NKX3-1, PTEN and RB1, indicating assay reliability. The estimated burden of CNAs was significantly associated with Gleason score, pathological T stage, surgical margin status and biochemical recurrence. Further, genomic losses or gains in specific chromosomal arms were significantly associated with worse BCR-free survival. Copy number signatures extracted from the LPWGS data showed potential for risk stratifying patients, where signatures S1 and S2 showed significant association to worse BCR-free survival compared to S3. Our study provides clinical validation of the associations between CNAs and tumor aggressiveness in an independent and representative RP cohort, while demonstrating the feasibility of performing LPWGS of FFPE tumor tissue for cost-effective assessment of CNAs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Paul Vinu Salachan
- Department of Molecular Medicine, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus N, Denmark
- Department of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University, Aarhus N, Denmark
| | | | - Michael Borre
- Department of Urology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus N, Denmark
| | - Karina Dalsgaard Sørensen
- Department of Molecular Medicine, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus N, Denmark.
- Department of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University, Aarhus N, Denmark.
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Hansen EB, Karlsson Q, Merson S, Wakerell S, Rageevakumar R, Jensen JB, Borre M, Kote-Jarai Z, Eeles RA, Sørensen KD. Impact of germline DNA repair gene variants on prognosis and treatment of men with advanced prostate cancer. Sci Rep 2023; 13:19135. [PMID: 37932350 PMCID: PMC10628129 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-023-46323-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/09/2023] [Accepted: 10/30/2023] [Indexed: 11/08/2023] Open
Abstract
The clinical importance of germline variants in DNA repair genes (DRGs) is becoming increasingly recognized, but their impact on advanced prostate cancer prognosis remains unclear. A cohort of 221 newly diagnosed metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) patients were screened for pathogenic germline variants in 114 DRGs. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS) on first-line androgen signaling inhibitor (ARSI) treatment for mCRPC. Secondary endpoints were time to mCRPC progression on initial androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) and overall survival (OS). Twenty-seven patients (12.2%) carried a germline DRG variant. DRG carrier status was independently associated with shorter PFS on first-line ARSI [HR 1.72 (1.06-2.81), P = 0.029]. At initiation of ADT, DRG carrier status was independently associated with shorter progression time to mCRPC [HR 1.56, (1.02-2.39), P = 0.04] and shorter OS [HR 1.99, (1.12-3.52), P = 0.02]. Investigating the contributions of individual germline DRG variants on PFS and OS revealed CHEK2 variants to have little effect. Furthermore, prior taxane treatment was associated with worse PFS on first-line ARSI for DRG carriers excluding CHEK2 (P = 0.0001), but not for noncarriers. In conclusion, germline DRG carrier status holds independent prognostic value for predicting advanced prostate cancer patient outcomes and may potentially inform on optimal treatment sequencing already at the hormone-sensitive stage.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Emma B Hansen
- Department of Molecular Medicine (MOMA), Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
- Department of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Questa Karlsson
- Division of Genetics & Epidemiology, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK
| | - Susan Merson
- Division of Genetics & Epidemiology, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK
| | - Sarah Wakerell
- Division of Genetics & Epidemiology, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK
| | - Reshma Rageevakumar
- Division of Genetics & Epidemiology, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK
| | - Jørgen B Jensen
- Department of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark
- Department of Urology, Regional Hospital of West Jutland, Gødstrup Hospital, Gødstrup, Denmark
| | - Michael Borre
- Department of Urology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Zsofia Kote-Jarai
- Division of Genetics & Epidemiology, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK
| | - Rosalind A Eeles
- Division of Genetics & Epidemiology, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK
- Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Karina D Sørensen
- Department of Molecular Medicine (MOMA), Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark.
- Department of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark.
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Myers MA, Arnold BJ, Bansal V, Mullen KM, Zaccaria S, Raphael BJ. HATCHet2: clone- and haplotype-specific copy number inference from bulk tumor sequencing data. BIORXIV : THE PREPRINT SERVER FOR BIOLOGY 2023:2023.07.13.548855. [PMID: 37502835 PMCID: PMC10370020 DOI: 10.1101/2023.07.13.548855] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 07/29/2023]
Abstract
Multi-region DNA sequencing of primary tumors and metastases from individual patients helps identify somatic aberrations driving cancer development. However, most methods to infer copy-number aberrations (CNAs) analyze individual samples. We introduce HATCHet2 to identify haplotype- and clone-specific CNAs simultaneously from multiple bulk samples. HATCHet2 introduces a novel statistic, the mirrored haplotype B-allele frequency (mhBAF), to identify mirrored-subclonal CNAs having different numbers of copies of parental haplotypes in different tumor clones. HATCHet2 also has high accuracy in identifying focal CNAs and extends the earlier HATCHet method in several directions. We demonstrate HATCHet2's improved accuracy using simulations and a single-cell sequencing dataset. HATCHet2 analysis of 50 prostate cancer samples from 10 patients reveals previously-unreported mirrored-subclonal CNAs affecting cancer genes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Matthew A. Myers
- Department of Computer Science, Princeton University, Princeton, USA
| | - Brian J. Arnold
- Center for Statistics and Machine Learning, Princeton University, Princeton, USA
| | - Vineet Bansal
- Princeton Research Computing, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ, USA
| | - Katelyn M. Mullen
- Human Oncology & Pathogenesis Program, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Simone Zaccaria
- Computational Cancer Genomics Research Group, University College London Cancer Institute, London, UK
| | | |
Collapse
|
12
|
Herberts C, Wyatt AW, Nguyen PL, Cheng HH. Genetic and Genomic Testing for Prostate Cancer: Beyond DNA Repair. Am Soc Clin Oncol Educ Book 2023; 43:e390384. [PMID: 37207301 DOI: 10.1200/edbk_390384] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/21/2023]
Abstract
Significant progress has been made in genetic and genomic testing for prostate cancer across the disease spectrum. Molecular profiling is increasingly relevant for routine clinical management, fueled in part by advancements in testing technology and integration of biomarkers into clinical trials. In metastatic prostate cancer, defects in DNA damage response genes are now established predictors of benefit to US Food and Drug Administration-approved poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitors and immune checkpoint inhibitors, and trials are actively investigating these and other targeted treatment strategies in earlier disease states. Excitingly, opportunities for molecularly informed management beyond DNA damage response genes are also maturing. Germline genetic variants (eg, BRCA2 or MSH2/6) and polygenic germline risk scores are being investigated to inform cancer screening and active surveillance in at-risk carriers. RNA expression tests have recently gained traction in localized prostate cancer, enabling patient risk stratification and tailored treatment intensification via radiotherapy and/or androgen deprivation therapy for localized or salvage treatment. Finally, emerging minimally invasive circulating tumor DNA technology promises to enhance biomarker testing in advanced disease pending additional methodological and clinical validation. Collectively, genetic and genomic tests are rapidly becoming indispensable tools for informing the optimal clinical management of prostate cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Cameron Herberts
- Vancouver Prostate Centre, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Alexander W Wyatt
- Vancouver Prostate Centre, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
- Michael Smith Genome Sciences Centre, BC Cancer, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Paul L Nguyen
- Harvard Medical School, Dana-Farber/Brigham and Women's Cancer Center, Boston, MA
| | - Heather H Cheng
- University of Washington, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, WA
| |
Collapse
|