Vaccination Rates and Family Barriers Among Children with Inflammatory Bowel Disease

Effect of anti-SARS-CoV-2 BNT162b2 mRNA vaccination on thrombin generation in children with inflammatory bowel disease

Background

Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) including Crohn's disease (CD) and ulcerative colitis (UC), are associated with higher thrombotic risk and enhanced thrombin generation (TG) in adults. Despite encouraging data reporting vaccine safety and low IBD flare rates in adults with IBD, vaccine hesitancy was demonstrated to be high in families of children with IBD. We aimed to find out whether TG is increased in children with IBD as compared to healthy controls and whether TG parameters show significant changes following SARS-CoV-2 mRNA vaccination.

Patients and methods

In this observational case-control study, 38 children with IBD (CD:18, UC: 20) aged 12-18 years and 62 healthy age-and sex-matched children were enrolled. Blood was collected before the first dose and 2-6 weeks after the second dose of BNT162b2 (Pfizer-BioNTech) mRNA vaccine dose. Blood cell counts, fibrinogen, inflammatory markers (hsCRP, ferritin), anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibody levels were investigated, TG assay was carried-out using platelet-poor plasma. Detailed clinical parameters including disease activity scores (PUCAI, PCDAI) were registered pre-and post- vaccination. A guided questionnaire was used to collect data on adverse reactions (AEs) post- vaccination.

Results

Baseline TG parameters did not differ between patients and controls. Endogenous thrombin potential showed a significant positive correlation with markers of inflammation and with PCDAI. Inflammatory parameters and TG did not increase in patients and controls post-vaccination. Vaccination significantly increased antibody levels in all three investigated groups, but post-vaccination anti-SARS-CoV-2 S IgG/IgM levels were below the 5th percentile value of healthy children in more than one third of patients. Those receiving TNFα inhibitor therapy presented significantly lower SARS-CoV-2 S IgG/IgM levels as compared to patients on other immunosuppressive regimens. Systemic AEs did not differ between patients and controls while lower rate of local symptoms was found post-vaccination in children with IBD. Only 2 IBD flares were detected 2-6 weeks after the second dose of vaccination.

Conclusion

Our study is the first to support the safety and efficacy of anti-SARS-CoV-2 BNT162b2 vaccination in children with IBD with detailed pre-and post-vaccination laboratory data including TG. Results of this study may further increase confidence and reduce vaccine hesitancy in caretakers of pediatric IBD patients.

Reasons for refusal of the human papillomavirus vaccine among young cancer survivors

BACKGROUND

Cancer survivors are at risk for developing subsequent human papillomavirus (HPV)-related malignancies. HPV vaccination rates among survivors remain low, and the reasons for refusal of the vaccine are unclear in this population.

METHODS

The authors conducted a secondary analysis of data from an open-label clinical trial evaluating the immunogenicity and safety of the HPV vaccine among vaccine-naive cancer survivors who were 9-26 years old and 1-5 years from the completion of their cancer treatment. Survivors/parents who declined trial participation were asked their reasons for declining. Refusal reasons were categorized, and multivariable logistic regression models were developed to identify associations between survivor characteristics and primary refusal reasons.

RESULTS

Among the 301 survivors who refused participation in the clinical trial, 215 (71.4%) refused for reasons related to the HPV vaccine. Reasons for vaccine-related refusal included safety concerns, vaccine hesitancy/disinterest, external influences, vaccine-related information deficits, and health beliefs/family decisional processes. Compared with males, females were more likely to refuse for reasons related to health beliefs/family decisional processes (odds ratio [OR], 2.08; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.12-3.93; p = .022) and were less likely to do so because of external influences (OR, 0.43; 95% CI, 0.19-0.92; p = .035). Survivors approached about participation during the latter years of the trial were more likely to refuse because of safety concerns (OR, 3.33; 95% CI, 1.55-7.69; p = .003).

CONCLUSIONS

Cancer survivors refused participation in an open-label trial evaluating the immunogenicity and safety of the HPV vaccine primarily because of vaccine-related concerns that were unrelated to the research study. Many of these concerns are potentially addressable by health care providers using evidence-based messages tailored to the cancer survivor population.

Safety of Immunizations for the Adult Patient With Inflammatory Bowel Disease-A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) have low vaccination rates for vaccine-preventable diseases. Fear of adverse reactions (AEs) appear to negatively affect vaccination efforts. We aimed to systemically review the risks for AEs following immunization for patients with IBD.

METHODS

We searched PubMed and Embase until April 15, 2020, for studies evaluating the safety of vaccinations among patients with IBD. The primary outcome was the incidence of systemic and local AEs among vaccinated patients. Secondary outcome was the rate of IBD flare following immunization. We utilized a random effects meta-analysis of proportions using the DerSimonian-Laird approach to estimate the safety of immunizations.

RESULTS

A total of 13 studies with 2116 patients was included in our analysis after fulfilling our inclusion criteria. Seven studies examined the influenza vaccine, 4 the pneumococcal vaccine, 1 the recombinant zoster vaccine, and 1 the hepatitis B vaccine. Follow-up of patients was up to 6 months. The majority of AEs were local, with a pooled incidence of 24% (95% CI, 9%-42%) for all vaccines. Systemic AEs were mostly mild, without resulting in hospitalizations or deaths, with a pooled incidence of 16% (95% CI, 6%-29%) for all vaccines. Flare of inflammatory bowel disease after vaccination found with a pooled incidence of 2% (95% CI, 1%-4%) and we include in the analysis data from all immunizations examined.

DISCUSSION

Our study demonstrated that AEs after vaccination are mainly local or mildly systemic and do not differ significantly from the expected AE after recommended immunizations for the general population. Thus, gastroenterologists should reinforce that vaccines are safe in patients with IBD.

Primary Care Professionals' Attitudes Towards Vaccination Recommendation for Patients With Inflammatory Bowel Disease

BACKGROUND

Immunization among patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) is suboptimal. We sought to characterize attitudes of US primary care professionals (PCPs) towards immunization practices for patients with IBD.

METHODS

Using a web-based opt-in panel of PCPs (DocStyles survey, spring 2021, cross-sectional study), we assessed likelihood of PCPs' recommending influenza, pneumococcal disease, herpes zoster, and human papilloma virus vaccinations for IBD patients by PCP characteristics and availability of clinical tools. Reasons for unlikelihood of recommending vaccines and approaches to improve vaccine recommendation were examined.

RESULTS

Among 1503 PCPs, 64% recommended all vaccines. Herpes zoster vaccine was most likely to be recommended (89.8%) and pneumococcal vaccine was least likely (74.0%). Clinical tools including decision support based on electronic health records (EHRs; 48.9%) and staff tracking of patients' vaccine needs (36.3%) were significantly associated with likelihood of recommending vaccines (P < .001). A greater likelihood of vaccine recommendation was observed for pediatricians vs other medical specialties, group outpatient clinic vs other worksites, and seeing >50 patients/week (P < .05). One-third of PCPs were unlikely to recommend ≥1 vaccine, and the top reason reported was unfamiliarity with vaccine guidelines for patients with IBD (48.0%). A review of guidelines or continued medical education (63.0%) and decision support from EHRs (51.2%) were the most frequently selected approaches identified to improve certainty of vaccine recommendation.

CONCLUSIONS

There is room for improvement of vaccination recommendations by PCPs. Promoting continuing education and use of clinical tools may help support PCP immunization practices for patients with IBD.