Alterations in regional myocardial distribution and arrhythmogenic effects of aprindine produced by coronary artery occlusion in the dog

Ventricular Arrhythmias in First Acute Myocardial Infarction: Epidemiology, Mechanisms, and Interventions in Large Animal Models

Ventricular arrhythmia and subsequent sudden cardiac death (SCD) due to acute myocardial infarction (AMI) is one of the most frequent causes of death in humans. Lethal ventricular arrhythmias like ventricular fibrillation (VF) prior to hospitalization have been reported to occur in more than 10% of all AMI cases and survival in these patients is poor. Identification of risk factors and mechanisms for VF following AMI as well as implementing new risk stratification models and therapeutic approaches is therefore an important step to reduce mortality in people with high cardiovascular risk. Studying spontaneous VF following AMI in humans is challenging as it often occurs unexpectedly in a low risk subgroup. Large animal models of AMI can help to bridge this knowledge gap and are utilized to investigate occurrence of arrhythmias, involved mechanisms and therapeutic options. Comparable anatomy and physiology allow for this translational approach. Through experimental focus, using state-of-the-art technologies, including refined electrical mapping equipment and novel pharmacological investigations, valuable insights into arrhythmia mechanisms and possible interventions for arrhythmia-induced SCD during the early phase of AMI are now beginning to emerge. This review describes large experimental animal models of AMI with focus on first AMI-associated ventricular arrhythmias. In this context, epidemiology of first AMI, arrhythmogenic mechanisms and various potential therapeutic pharmacological targets will be discussed.

Amiodarone Treatment in the Early Phase of Acute Myocardial Infarction Protects Against Ventricular Fibrillation in a Porcine Model

Ventricular fibrillation (VF) occurring in the first minutes to hours of acute myocardial infarction (AMI) is a frequent cause of death and treatment options are limited. The aim was to test whether early infusion of amiodarone 10 min after onset of AMI reduced the incidence of VF in a porcine model. Eighteen female Danish landrace pigs were randomized to a control and an amiodarone group. AMI was induced by ligation of the mid-left anterior descending artery for 120 min followed by 60 min of reperfusion. VF occurred in 0/8 pigs treated with amiodarone compared to 7/10 controls (P < 0.01). Amiodarone treatment prolonged RR intervals, reduced dispersion of action potential duration in the infarcted area and mean number of ectopic beats. No negative effects on cardiac output and blood pressure were observed with amiodarone. Amiodarone qualifies as a potential drug candidate to prevent VF in the first minutes to hours of AMI.

Aggravation of Arrhythmia by Antiarrhythmic Drugs (Proarrhythmia)

Arrhythmia aggravation by antiarrhythmic drugs (proarrhythmia) can be caused by worsening or a change of a preexisting arrhythmia, development of a new arrhythmia, or development of a bradyarrhythmia. Aggravation of arrhythmia usually occurs within several days of beginning an antiarrhythmic drug or increasing the dose of the drug. The time of occurrence is based on the particular drug and its pharmacokinetic properties. Although there are no ways to predict the patient at risk for developing arrhythmia aggravation with any specific agents, risk factors include QT interval prolongation, elevated serum levels of the drug, electrolyte abnormalities, presence of heart failure, a history of a sustained ventricular tachyarrhythmia, and underlying myocardial ischemia.

Arrhythmogenic Ion-Channel Remodeling in the Heart: Heart Failure, Myocardial Infarction, and Atrial Fibrillation

Rhythmic and effective cardiac contraction depends on appropriately timed generation and spread of cardiac electrical activity. The basic cellular unit of such activity is the action potential, which is shaped by specialized proteins (channels and transporters) that control the movement of ions across cardiac cell membranes in a highly regulated fashion. Cardiac disease modifies the operation of ion channels and transporters in a way that promotes the occurrence of cardiac rhythm disturbances, a process called “arrhythmogenic remodeling.” Arrhythmogenic remodeling involves alterations in ion channel and transporter expression, regulation and association with important protein partners, and has important pathophysiological implications that contribute in major ways to cardiac morbidity and mortality. We review the changes in ion channel and transporter properties associated with three important clinical and experimental paradigms: congestive heart failure, myocardial infarction, and atrial fibrillation. We pay particular attention to K+, Na+, and Ca2+channels; Ca2+transporters; connexins; and hyperpolarization-activated nonselective cation channels and discuss the mechanisms through which changes in ion handling processes lead to cardiac arrhythmias. We highlight areas of future investigation, as well as important opportunities for improved therapeutic approaches that are being opened by an improved understanding of the mechanisms of arrhythmogenic remodeling.

Oxidative Mediated Lipid Peroxidation Recapitulates Proarrhythmic Effects on Cardiac Sodium Channels

Sudden cardiac death attributable to ventricular tachycardia/fibrillation (VF) remains a catastrophic outcome of myocardial ischemia and infarction. At the same time, conventional antagonist drugs targeting ion channels have yielded poor survival benefits. Although pharmacological and genetic models suggest an association between sodium (Na + ) channel loss-of-function and sudden cardiac death, molecular mechanisms have not been identified that convincingly link ischemia to Na + channel dysfunction and ventricular arrhythmias. Because ischemia can evoke the generation of reactive oxygen species, we explored the effect of oxidative stress on Na + channel function. We show here that oxidative stress reduces Na + channel availability. Both the general oxidant tert-butyl-hydroperoxide and a specific, highly reactive product of the isoprostane pathway of lipid peroxidation, E 2 -isoketal, potentiate inactivation of cardiac Na + channels in human embryonic kidney (HEK)-293 cells and cultured atrial (HL-1) myocytes. Furthermore, E 2 -isoketals were generated in the epicardial border zone of the canine healing infarct, an arrhythmogenic focus where Na + channels exhibit similar inactivation defects. In addition, we show synergistic functional effects of flecainide, a proarrhythmic Na + channel blocker, and oxidative stress. These data suggest Na + channel dysfunction evoked by lipid peroxidation is a candidate mechanism for ischemia-related conduction abnormalities and arrhythmias.

Extracellular acidosis modulates drug block of Kv4.3 currents by flecainide and quinidine

INTRODUCTION

As a molecular model of the effect of ischemia on drug block of the transient outward potassium current, the effect of acidosis on the blocking properties of flecainide and quinidine on Kv4.3 currents was studied.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Kv4.3 channels were stably expressed in Chinese hamster ovary cells. Whole-cell, voltage clamp techniques were used to measure the effect of flecainide and quinidine on Kv4.3 currents in solutions of pH 7.4 and 6.0. Extracellular acidosis attenuated flecainide block of Kv4.3 currents, with the IC50 for flecainide (based on current-time integrals) increasing from 7.8 +/- 1.1 microM at pH 7.4 to 125.1 +/- 1.1 microM at pH 6.0. Similar effects were observed for quinidine (IC50 5.2 +/- 1.1 microM at pH 7.4 and 22.1 +/- 1.3 microM at pH 6.0). Following block by either drug, Kv4.3 channels showed a hyperpolarizing shift in the voltage sensitivity of inactivation and a slowing in the time to recover from inactivation/block that was unaffected by acidosis. In contrast, acidosis attenuated the effects on the time course of inactivation and the degree of tonic- and frequency-dependent block for both drugs.

CONCLUSION

Extracellular acidosis significantly decreases the potency of blockade of Kv4.3 by both flecainide and quinidine. This change in potency may be due to allosteric changes in the channel, changes in the proportion of uncharged drug, and/or changes in the kinetics of drug binding or unbinding. These findings are in contrast to the effects of extracellular acidosis on block of the fast sodium channel by these agents and provide a molecular mechanism for divergent modulation of drug block potentially leading to ischemia-associated proarrhythmia.

Treating electrical storm : sympathetic blockade versus advanced cardiac life support-guided therapy

BACKGROUND

Electrical storm (ES), defined as recurrent multiple ventricular fibrillation (VF) episodes, often occurs in patients with recent myocardial infarction. Because treating ES according to the Advanced Cardiac Life Support (ACLS) guidelines yields a poor outcome, we evaluated the efficacy of sympathetic blockade in treating ES patients and compared their outcome with that of patients treated according to the ACLS guidelines.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Forty-nine patients (36 men, 13 women, mean age 57+/-10 years) who had ES associated with a recent myocardial infarction were separated into 2 groups. Patients in group 1 (n=27) received sympathetic blockade treatment: 6 left stellate ganglionic blockade, 7 esmolol, and 14 propranolol. Patients in group 2 (n=22) received antiarrhythmic medication as recommended by the ACLS guidelines. Patient characteristics were similar in the 2 groups. The 1-week mortality rate was higher in group 2: 18 (82%) of the 22 patients died, all of refractory VF; 6 (22%) of the 27 group 1 patients died, 3 of refractory VF (P<0.0001). Patients who survived the initial ES event did well over the 1-year follow-up period: Overall survival in group 1 was 67%, compared with 5% in group 2 (P<0.0001).

CONCLUSIONS

Sympathetic blockade is superior to the antiarrhythmic therapy recommended by the ACLS guidelines in treating ES patients. Our study emphasizes the role of increased sympathetic activity in the genesis of ES. Sympathetic blockade-not class 1 antiarrhythmic drugs-should be the treatment of choice for ES.

Evolution, mechanisms, and classification of antiarrhythmic drugs: focus on class III actions

Since the use of cinchona bark to treat heart palpitations in the 1700s, antiarrhythmic drug therapy has developed with the discovery of new compounds and the identification of ionic, cellular, and tissue mechanisms of action. Classifications have been developed that organize the large amount of information available about antiarrhythmic drugs around groups of compounds with common mechanisms of action. Despite important and well-recognized limitations, antiarrhythmic drug classification is still widely used. In particularly broad use is the system developed by Singh and Vaughan Williams in the early 1970s and subsequently modified by Singh and Hauswirth and by Harrison. This classification divides drug actions into class I for sodium-channel blockade (with subclasses IA, IB and IC), class II for adrenergic antagonism, class III for action-potential prolongation, and class IV for calcium-channel blockade. The development of class I drugs was curtailed when studies showed that potent sodium-channel blockers (particularly IC agents) can increase mortality in patients with active coronary artery disease. The emphasis in drug development shifted to class III agents, but their use has been limited by the risk of ventricular tachyarrhythmia induction associated with QT prolongation. Current research focuses on the development of new class III drugs that may have improved safety by virtue of greater selectivity of action at faster rates (like those of arrhythmia) or for atrial tissue. Alternative approaches include the modification of existing molecules (like amiodarone) to maintain positive properties while removing undesirable ones, and treatments that target development of the arrhythmia substrate instead of the final electrical product.

Optimal management with Class I and Class III antiarrhythmic drugs should be done in the outpatient setting: protagonist

It has been suggested that patients be admitted for the initiation of Class I and Class III antiarrhythmic drugs to avoid serious proarrhythmic consequences. The most clinically significant proarrhythmic response to Class IC agents is likely due to an interaction with acute ischemia, and hospitalization for initiation of drug therapy has little predictive or preventive value. Amiodarone has a low risk of proarrhythmia, and any proarrhythmic reactions are generally delayed. Class IA and Class III antiarrhythmic drugs cause acquired long QT syndrome arrhythmias, which can occur soon after initiation of therapy; however, only about half of the arrhythmic events occur within 3 days of initiation of therapy. It could be argued that all patients should be hospitalized to begin Class IA or Class III drugs; however, this approach has a low yield and is extremely expensive. An alternative is to use Class IA and Class III drugs for patients at low risk of torsades de pointes (e.g., males without heart failure, ventricular tachyarrhythmias, or active coronary disease), in whom hospitalization for drug initiation is not warranted. Higher risk patients are probably better treated with other agents, such as Class IC drugs or amiodarone for women without organic heart disease and amiodarone for patients with heart failure, a history of ventricular tachycardia, or active coronary disease. When a Class IA or Class III drug is required for patient with an increased risk of torsades de pointes, hospital admission for drug initiation may be indicated.

The molecular and ionic specificity of antiarrhythmic drug actions

Virtually all clinical antiarrhythmic agents act by reducing ion channel conductance, with sodium (Na+), potassium (K+), and calcium (Ca++) channels the primary targets. Na+ channel blockers increase the risk of ischemic ventricular fibrillation and are relatively contraindicated in the presence of active coronary heart disease. Ca++ channel blockers suppress AV nodal conduction and are used to terminate reentrant supraventricular arrhythmias and control the ventricular response to atrial fibrillation. K+ channels constitute the most diverse group of cardiac ion channels. They are the primary targets of Class III antiarrhythmic drugs, the category of such agents presently undergoing the most active development. The rapid delayed rectifier, IKr, plays a key role in repolarization of all cardiac tissues and is the most common (and often only) target of action potential-prolonging drugs. Unfortunately, because of the ubiquity of IKr and the reverse use-dependent action potential prolongation that results from blocking it, IKr blockers are likely to cause torsades de pointes ventricular proarrhythmia. K+ channel blockers, such as amiodarone and azimilide, that affect the slow delayed rectifier IKs as well as IKr, appear to produce a more desirable rate-dependent profile of Class III action. Recently, much has been learned about the molecular basis of K+ channels based on their role in the congenital long QT syndrome. The availability of molecular clones that encode many of the channels in the human heart allows for the rapid screening of many potential new drugs, making possible the development of "designer" antiarrhythmic drugs with specific profiles of channel-blocking selectivity.

Mechanisms and management of proarrhythmia

It is now well recognized that therapy with antiarrhythmic drugs can not only suppress cardiac arrhythmias, but also may increase their frequency or provoke new ones. Specific proarrhythmia syndromes, each with a distinct underlying mechanism and approach to therapy, have been described. The best-recognized examples are digitalis intoxication, proarrhythmia associated with sodium-channel block, and torsade de pointes occurring during QT-prolonging therapies. In the case of sodium-channel blockers, 2 forms of proarrhythmia are commonly recognized: slow atrial flutter with 1:1 atrioventricular conduction, and frequent ventricular tachycardia ([VT], most often found in patients with pre-existing VT reentrant circuits). In all cases, the best approach to therapy is to identify patients at risk (and thereby avoid therapy entirely), to recognize proarrhythmia when it occurs, to withdraw offending agent(s), and to use specific corrective therapies when available. Although most recognized episodes of proarrhythmia are thought to occur early in drug therapy, the increased mortality during chronic antiarrhythmic therapy demonstrated in large randomized trials suggests this phenomenon can also develop during long-term drug treatment. The recognition of proarrhythmia and the delineation of its underlying mechanisms should not only improve therapy with available drugs, but may also direct development of newer agents devoid of this potential.

Electrophysiological mechanisms for ventricular arrhythmias in patients with myocardial ischemia: anesthesiologic considerations, Pt II

This is the second half of a two-part review article that discusses ventricular tachyarrhythmias, either induced by acute ischemia or consequent to chronic myocardial ischemia, and their anesthestic implications. The first half of the article was published in the June 1997 Issue of The Journal.

Propafenone during acute myocardial ischemia in patients: a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled study

OBJECTIVES

The proarrhythmic risk of class I antiarrhythmic agents in combination with myocardial ischemia is mainly the result of their effects on ventricular repolarization. This study was designed to evaluate the effect of class Ic antiarrhythmic agents on QT dispersion during myocardial ischemia.

BACKGROUND

QT interval dispersion on the 12-lead electrocardiogram (ECG) has been suggested as a noninvasive marker of inhomogeneous ventricular repolarization and susceptibility to ventricular arrhythmias.

METHODS

In a randomized, double-blind study, 98 patients undergoing percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA) were pretreated with propafenone or placebo. QT dispersion was defined as a maximal minus minimal QT interval on the 12-lead ECG before and after PTCA. The power of the study to detect clinically meaningful differences in QT dispersion was 0.75, and a twofold increase in QT dispersion in the propafenone group compared with the placebo group was considered clinically relevant.

RESULTS

The QT and corrected QT (QTc) intervals increased significantly during occlusion of the left anterior descending coronary artery (LAD) (9% and 11%, respectively, p < 0.05), whereas occlusion of the circumflex and right coronary arteries had no effect. QTc dispersion increased significantly in the propafenone group during ischemia (+52%, p = 0.002, vs. +23%, p = 0.15). The most considerable effect on QT dispersion was observed during LAD occlusion and ischemia of the anterior wall (+74%, p = 0.025). Corrected JT dispersion (+57%, p = 0.017, vs. +24%, p = 0.23) and the QT dispersion ratio (+1.6%, p = 0.031, vs. 0.9%, p = 0.34) showed similar effects. Plasma levels of propafenone (522 +/- 165 micrograms/liter) did not influence the results.

CONCLUSIONS

During myocardial ischemia, particularly during LAD occlusion, propafenone results in a significant increase in QT dispersion. The results indicate that QT interval prolongation and enhanced QT dispersion reflect inhomogeneous ventricular repolarization generated by the ischemic anterior wall of the myocardium. These observations may demonstrate a clinically important interaction between myocardial ischemia, repolarization variables and propafenone.

Mechanism of lethal proarrhythmia observed in the Cardiac Arrhythmia Suppression Trial: role of adrenergic modulation of drug binding

A variety of recent in vivo studies have sought to clarify the mechanism underlying the proarrhythmic response of flecainide in the Cardiac Arrhythmia Suppression Trial (CAST). Increased inducibility of relatively stable ventricular arrhythmias in subacute and chronic postinfarction models has been universally observed. The arrhythmogenesis has been explained in part by drug induced modulation of anisotropic conduction in persistently ischemic tissue, increased durations of vulnerable windows, enhanced generation of unidirectional block with the introduction of extrastimuli, variability of repolarization within the ventricular wall, and the creation of stable reentrant circuits with narrow central zones of propagation. While these data explain arrhythmogenesis in general, malignant ventricular arrhythmia capable of producing the excess sudden or arrhythmic death mortality in the CAST trial have not been universally observed, nor have the proported beneficial effects of beta-blockade seen in the CAST trial and other studies been explained. Additional studies examining the adrenergic modulation of flecainide binding have shown reversal of flecainide effects in normal tissue, but paradoxical amplification of flecainide induced conduction slowing in depolarized tissue. This variable effect in normal versus abnormal tissue produces significant dispersions of conduction with an expected increased propensity for conduction failure in response to ectopy, increased liminal length for impulse propagation, enhanced vulnerability to premature extrastimuli, and completed reentrant circuits in regions of depressed membrane potentials. This, along with the decrease in action potential duration and accompanying refractoriness in the setting of adrenergic modulation may favor more malignant double wavelet or unstable ventricular arrhythmias.

Ionic mechanisms for prolongation of refractoriness and their proarrhythmic and antiarrhythmic correlates

Drugs that prolong cardiac refractoriness exert antiarrhythmic effects, probably by reducing dispersion of refractoriness and thereby reducing the likelihood of reentrant excitation. This electrophysiologic effect can be achieved in fast-response tissues by sodium channel block or by action potential prolongation; drugs with either attribute can exert antiarrhythmic effects. However, both types of drugs can also cause proarrhythmic effects. For sodium channel blockers, proarrhythmic actions can be attributed to conduction slowing and include increased frequency of episodes of ventricular tachycardia as well as slowing of atrial flutter with 1:1 atrioventricular conduction and increases in ventricular rate. In addition, sodium channel block has been implicated as the mechanism underlying increased mortality with sodium channel blockers in the Cardiac Arrhythmia Suppression Trial (CAST); some data suggest that intercurrent ischemia increases this risk. For drugs that prolong action potentials, torsades de pointes is the most common proarrhythmic syndrome, occurring most often with underlying bradyarrhythmias and hypokalemia. The mechanism(s) underlying normal refractoriness and its modulation by antiarrhythmic drugs, as well as the mechanism(s) underlying these proarrhythmic syndromes, are discussed.

Interaction of ischaemia and encainide/flecainide treatment: a proposed mechanism for the increased mortality in CAST I

OBJECTIVE

To determine whether an interaction between encainide or flecainide and intercurrent ischaemia could account for the observed increase in cardiac and sudden deaths in the study group in the Cardiac Arrhythmia Suppression Trial (CAST) I.

DESIGN

CAST I was a randomised, double blind, placebo controlled study in which patients received the drug which suppressed at least 6 premature ventricular contractions per minute by 80% or episodes of non-sustained ventricular tachycardia by 90%. Arrhythmic sudden death or aborted sudden death were the study end points. Measured secondary end points included recurrent myocardial infarction, new or increasing angina pectoris, congestive heart failure, and syncope. The CAST I database was analysed to determine which of three end points occurred first--cardiac death or cardiac arrest, angina pectoris, or non-fatal recurrent infarction. They were regarded as mutually exclusive end points. The triad of cardiac or sudden arrhythmic death plus congestive heart failure and syncope was similarly analysed.

RESULTS

It was assumed that recurrent non-fatal infarction and new or increasing angina pectoris were ischaemic in origin. The sum of these non-fatal ischaemic end points and sudden death were nearly identical in the placebo group (N = 129) and the treatment group (N = 131). The one year event rate in each group was 21%. However, the treatment group had a much greater fatality rate (55 v 17; P < 0.0001) than the placebo group. The same relation was found when the data were examined on the basis of drug exposure rather than intention to treat. The temporal and circadian events were similar in each group and were consistent with an ischaemic pattern. No such patterns emerged from analysis of the presumed non-ischaemic end points of congestive heart failure and syncope.

CONCLUSIONS

These data suggest that the interaction between active ischaemia and treatment with encainide or flecainide may have been responsible for the increased mortality seen in the treatment group in CAST I. This conversion of a non-fatal to a fatal event emphasises the need for future antiarrhythmic drugs to be screened in ischaemic models.

Determinants and mechanisms of flecainide-induced promotion of ventricular tachycardia in anesthetized dogs

BACKGROUND

Class IC antiarrhythmic agents such as flecainide are known to have potentially significant ventricular proarrhythmic actions, but the underlying mechanisms are incompletely understood. While some studies have reported proarrhythmia in both healthy dogs and dogs that previously have had a myocardial infarction (MI), there are no published, controlled studies comparing proarrhythmia in healthy dogs vs in dogs with MI. In addition, the concentration dependence of proarrhythmia is unknown and the electrophysiological changes associated with proarrhythmia are not well established.

METHODS

We administered successive loading and maintenance infusions of flecainide until ventricular tachyarrhythmia or death occurred in 13 healthy dogs and 19 dogs with 72-hour-old MIs (MI dogs). Ventricular proarrhythmia, defined as reproducible ventricular tachycardia absent under control conditions and occurring in the presence of flecainide, was observed in 4 of 13 healthy dogs (31%) and 15 of 19 MI dogs (79%, P = .02), and drug-induced spontaneous ventricular tachycardia occurred in 8 of 19 MI dogs but in no healthy dogs (P = .007). Activation data at the time of proarrhythmia were available for 11 MI dogs and provided evidence for reentry in 9, with a complete epicardial reentry circuit identified in 4 dogs and a partial circuit in 5. While flecainide slowed ventricular conduction in both the longitudinal and transverse directions, there were no significant differences between overall drug-induced conduction changes in MI dogs compared with healthy dogs. However, in 7 MI dogs for whom activation data were available during ventricular pacing at concentrations comparable to those causing proarrhythmia, flecainide induced a new arc of block in 6 of 7, whereas an arc of block was never observed in the absence of proarrhythmia. Conduction block was induced transverse to fiber orientation in a rate-dependent fashion and was caused by a regionally-specific effect of the drug. No differences were noted between refractory periods proximal and distal to the site of block.

CONCLUSIONS

Prior MI strongly predisposes dogs to flecainide proarrhythmia, which occurs in the majority of such dogs in a concentration-related way. In most cases, activation data suggest that anisotropic reentry around a localized arc of rate-dependent transverse conduction block underlies proarrhythmia. These results provide insights into the conditions and mechanisms underlying the ability of flecainide to promote the occurrence of ventricular tachycardia.

Time to arrhythmic, ischemic, and heart failure events: exploratory analyses to elucidate mechanisms of adverse drug effects in the Cardiac Arrhythmia Suppression Trial

In this study we investigated the time to the first arrhythmic, ischemic, or failure event for encainide-flecainide and moricizine versus their respective placebo comparison groups in the Cardiac Arrhythmia Suppression Trial. The purpose was to explore possible mechanisms for the excessive deaths associated with active therapy that have been previously reported. Differences were noted between the active drugs. In particular, encainide-flecainide appeared to convert an ischemic event into death in more cases and more promptly than moricizine. However, the excessive deaths noted on encainide-flecainide were as likely to occur subsequent to a failure event as an ischemic event; for both encainide-flecainide and moricizine, the vast majority of excess deaths appeared to be the result of an increase in arrhythmia events without any protective effect of the drug. We were unable to identify any specific mechanism to explain the adverse effect of encainide and flecainide.

Interaction of baseline characteristics with the hazard of encainide, flecainide, and moricizine therapy in patients with myocardial infarction. A possible explanation for increased mortality in the Cardiac Arrhythmia Suppression Trial (CAST)

BACKGROUND

The Cardiac Arrhythmia Suppression Trial (CAST) was designed to test the hypothesis that suppression of ventricular ectopy with antiarrhythmic drugs after a myocardial infarction reduces the incidence of sudden arrhythmic death. Patients in whom ventricular ectopy could be suppressed with encainide, flecainide, or moricizine were randomly assigned to receive either active drug or placebo. The encainide and flecainide arms of the study were discontinued in 1989 (CAST-I) and the moricizine arm in 1991 (CAST-II) because of excess mortality. To explore the mechanisms of these adverse outcomes, we examined the interaction of baseline characteristics with the hazard of therapy with encainide, flecainide, or moricizine compared with their respective placebos.

METHODS AND RESULTS

CAST-I comprised 755 patients assigned to flecainide or encainide and 743 patients assigned to placebo, whereas in CAST-II, 502 patients received moricizine and 491 patients received placebo. Clinical and laboratory baseline variables of patients receiving active drug and those receiving placebo were similar. In CAST-I patients, there was a significant interaction of active therapy with both all-cause death/cardiac arrest and arrhythmic death/cardiac arrest for non-Q-wave myocardial infarction (total mortality hazard ratios, 1.8 versus 7.9 for Q-wave versus non-Q-wave infarction, P = .03). Ventricular premature depolarization (VPD) frequency > or = 50/h and heart rate > or = 74 beats per minute each interacted significantly with total mortality/cardiac arrest only. In the sicker CAST-II patients (ejection fraction < or = 40%), only diuretic use at baseline interacted significantly with moricizine use for both all-cause death/cardiac arrest and arrhythmic death/cardiac arrest (total mortality hazard ratios, 1.9 versus 0.7 for diuretic use versus no use, P = .01).

CONCLUSIONS

Although active treatment in CAST-I was associated with greater mortality than placebo with respect to almost all baseline variables, the therapeutic hazard was more than expected in patients with non-Q-wave myocardial infarction and (for total mortality) frequent premature VPDs and higher heart rates, suggesting that the adverse effect of encainide or flecainide therapy is greater when ischemic and electrical instability are present. The relative hazard of therapy with moricizine in the sicker CAST-II population was greater in those using diuretics. Thus, although these drugs have the common ability to suppress ventricular ectopy after myocardial infarction, their detrimental effects on survival may be mediated by different mechanisms in different populations, emphasizing the complex, poorly understood hazards associated with antiarrhythmic drug treatment.

Beta-blocker therapy in the Cardiac Arrhythmia Suppression Trial. CAST Investigators

The Cardiac Arrhythmia Suppression Trial (CAST) showed antiarrhythmic drug suppression of asymptomatic or mildly symptomatic ventricular arrhythmias in survivors of myocardial infarction to be harmful. This study retrospectively searched the CAST results for evidence of mortality and morbidity reduction in patients receiving optional beta-blocker therapy. All enrolled (n = 2,611) and suppressed main study (n = 1,735) CAST patients with an ejection fraction of < or = 40% were examined using univariate analysis, Kaplan-Meier curves, and a Cox proportional-hazards multivariate analysis with respect to optional beta-blocker therapy prescribed at baseline. CAST patients receiving beta-blocker therapy had significantly enhanced survival at 30 days, and at 1 and 2 years of follow-up against all-cause and arrhythmic death or nonfatal cardiac arrest. Multivariate analysis showed beta-blocker therapy to be independently associated with a one-third reduction in arrhythmic death or cardiac arrest (p = 0.036). In CAST patients with a history of congestive heart failure, beta-blocker therapy was independently associated with longer time to occurrence of new or worsened congestive heart failure (p = 0.015). This study supports the secondary preventive benefit of beta-blocker therapy in high-risk post-myocardial infarction patients, and calls attention to the possible preventive benefit of beta-blocker therapy against proarrhythmic events experienced in the CAST.

Modulation of procainamide's effect on cardiac conduction in dogs by extracellular potassium concentration. A quantitative analysis

BACKGROUND

Antiarrhythmic drugs are known to have state-dependent interactions with cardiac sodium channels, and these have potentially important implications for drug effects on cardiac conduction, particularly in situations of changed resting potential and heart rate. Recent advances in theoretical approaches permit beat-to-beat changes in sodium channel block to be inferred from conduction changes in vivo and allow for an analysis of state-dependent drug action from conduction changes occurring on the onset of pacing at different rates. The purpose of the present study was to use this method to analyze the interaction between hyperkalemia and procainamide's sodium channel-blocking action in terms of resulting changes in left ventricular conduction.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Epicardial mapping with a 56-electrode array was used to assess ventricular conduction in open chest, anesthetized mongrel dogs with Formalin-induced atrioventricular block. Procainamide was infused as a series of loading and maintenance infusions until at least 20% conduction slowing was obtained at the shortest basic cycle length (300 milliseconds). Results in a control set of normokalemic dogs were compared with results in dogs with moderate hyperkalemia produced by a loading and maintenance infusion of potassium chloride. Plasma procainamide concentration was measured by high-performance liquid chromatography, and the constancy of serum potassium concentration was verified with ion-sensitive electrode measurement. Although hyperkalemia itself (mean +/- SEM potassium concentration, 6.64 +/- 0.66 mmol/L) did not alter conduction, it resulted in substantially increased conduction slowing by procainamide despite substantially lower plasma drug concentrations (102 +/- 10 mumol/L) compared with normokalemic dogs (potassium concentration, 3.87 +/- 0.24 mmol/L; procainamide concentration, 277 +/- 16 mumol/L). The onset of conduction slowing and block followed basic molecular theory, with an exponential time constant that was faster at longer cycle lengths and total block that increased as cycle length decreased. Piecewise exponential analysis of block during the rested and depolarized phases of the action potential showed that the enhancement of procainamide's action by hyperkalemia was due almost exclusively to increased rested-phase block. Hyperkalemia produced a bradycardia-dependent and slight reduction in action potential duration and antagonized the action potential-prolonging effect of procainamide, particularly at shorter cycle lengths.

CONCLUSIONS

Hyperkalemia strongly enhances procainamide-induced conduction slowing by increasing the interaction between the drug and sodium channels during the rested phase of the cardiac cycle. These results indicate the applicability of basic molecular theories of antiarrhythmic drug action to understanding drug-induced changes in conduction velocity in vivo and highlight the potential importance of heterogeneous magnification of sodium channel-blocking drug action by the spatially variable hyperkalemia that occurs with acute myocardial ischemia. The latter could play an important role in the known proarrhythmic potential of sodium channel-blocking drugs in patients with coronary artery disease.

Future evaluation of antiarrhythmic therapy

The expansion of antiarrhythmic therapy beyond pharmacologic agents to include surgery, devices, and ablation procedures, plus the reaffirmation by the Cardiac Arrhythmia Suppression Trial (CAST) of the need for concurrent placebo-controlled trials to establish a mortality benefit, have resulted in the need to consider the requirements for evaluating therapy. Pharmacologic therapy may be used in three ways: (1) primary; (2) alternative; and (3) adjunctive. To accurately identify a mortality benefit from primary therapy, a placebo-controlled study is necessary. In contrast, control of symptoms may be identified without the same rigorous demands. Current data are limited by the absence of true negative controls for most interventions that claim a possible mortality benefit. Alternative therapy provides a choice between equally effective therapies, neither of which has necessarily been documented to have a mortality benefit. Adjunctive therapy is that which is used for control of symptoms, whereas another therapy is used to provide a presumed or proved mortality benefit. For any of these approaches, therapy must be further evaluated in terms of four modifying variables: (1) impact of therapy on the basis of both its efficacy and efficiency; (2) interpretation of outcome data based on analysis of competing risks; (3) measurement of efficacy in terms of extension of life; and (4) analysis of outcome as the equilibrium between antiarrhythmic benefit and proarrhythmic risk. With these approaches a rational analysis of the effect of therapy and its cost-based benefit can be achieved.

A consensus report on antiarrhythmic drug use

During the past few years, a number of new antiarrhythmic agents have become available for use in the United States, encainide has been withdrawn from use, and others have had indications for use modified. Therefore, a meeting of arrhythmia specialists was convened in an attempt to develop guidelines for antiarrhythmic therapy. The resultant discussions and guidelines presented in this article address general issues such as the most important antiarrhythmic drug attributes, as well as therapy for particular arrhythmias such as premature ventricular contractions, ventricular tachycardia, ventricular fibrillation, ventricular ectopy, and supraventricular tachyarrhythmias.

Aggravation of arrhythmia: a complication of antiarrhythmic drugs

Aggravation of arrhythmia, defined as worsening of a preexisting arrhythmia or the occurrence of a new arrhythmia, is a common complication of antiarrhythmic drug therapy. Although it is largely an unpredictable event, patients at greatest risk are those with a history of congestive heart failure due to systolic dysfunction who present with a sustained ventricular tachyarrhythmia. As a rule, aggravation of arrhythmia is an early event, occurring within the first few days of initiating therapy. However, in the Cardiac Arrhythmia Suppression Trial (CAST), the increased sudden death mortality due to drug therapy, which was a result of arrhythmia aggravation, occurred throughout the entire duration of the trial, suggesting that arrhythmia aggravation can also be a late complication of therapy. Also disturbing was the fact that patients in CAST were low risk and did not have congestive heart failure or a serious ventricular tachyarrhythmia. This suggests that another important risk factor is myocardial ischemia and its potentially dangerous interaction with antiarrhythmic drugs. In patients with heart disease, especially those with coronary artery disease, antiarrhythmic drugs must therefore be used cautiously. Close and continuous follow-up is mandatory.

Mechanism of flecainide's antiarrhythmic action in experimental atrial fibrillation

Class Ic antiarrhythmic drugs are effective in the treatment of atrial fibrillation, but their mechanism of action is unknown. In previous work, we have found that flecainide causes tachycardia-dependent increases in atrial action potential duration (APD) and effective refractory period (ERP) by reducing APD accommodation to heart rate. The present study was designed to evaluate the efficacy and mechanisms of action of flecainide in an experimental model of sustained atrial fibrillation (AF). AF was produced by a brief burst of atrial pacing in the presence of vagal stimulation and persisted spontaneously until vagal stimulation was stopped. The actions of flecainide at two dose levels were compared with those of isotonic glucose placebo in each dog, with a randomized order of blinded drug administration. Flecainide terminated AF in all 16 dogs, while glucose was effective in none (p less than 0.0001). Flecainide increased atrial ERP and reduced conduction velocity in a tachycardia-dependent manner. Doses of flecainide that converted AF resulted in larger changes in ERP than in conduction velocity, increasing the minimum path-length capable of supporting reentry (wavelength). In addition, flecainide reduced regional heterogeneity in ERP and wavelength, an action opposite that of vagal stimulation. Atrial epicardial mapping with a 112-electrode atrial array was used to study the mechanism of flecainide action on AF. Under control conditions, multiple small zones of reentry coexisted. Flecainide progressively increased the size of reentry circuits, decreased their number, and slowed the frequency of atrial activation until the arrhythmia finally terminated; all changes were compatible with an increase in wavelength. We conclude that flecainide terminates atrial fibrillation in this experimental model by causing tachycardia-dependent increases in atrial ERP, which increase the wavelength at the rapid rates characteristic of AF to the point that the arrhythmia can no longer sustain itself.

Antiarrhythmic drug treatment: need for continuous vigilance

Any physician treating cardiac arrhythmias should be aware of a possible worsening of the arrhythmia (so-called arrhythmogenesis) after the start of antiarrhythmic drug treatment. To facilitate the recognition of that complication the type and possible mechanisms of arrhythmogenesis are reviewed. Recognition also requires an understanding of (a) the time of appearance of arrhythmogenic effects after different drugs, (b) the value of non-invasive and invasive tests, and (c) the profile of the patient most likely to develop this problem. Guidelines are given to reduce the incidence of the arrhythmogenic effects of antiarrhythmic drugs and a plea is made that the physician should be always on the alert for this complication.

Kinetics of use-dependent ventricular conduction slowing by antiarrhythmic drugs in humans

BACKGROUND

Rate-dependent conduction slowing by class I antiarrhythmic agents has clinically important consequences. Class I drugs are known to produce use-dependent sodium channel blockade. If rate-dependent conduction slowing by class I agents is due to sodium channel blocking actions, the kinetics of conduction slowing should be similar to those of depression of sodium current indexes in vitro. The purpose of the present investigation was to study the onset time course of ventricular conduction slowing caused by a variety of class I agents in humans.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Twenty-seven patients undergoing electrophysiological evaluation for antiarrhythmic therapy were studied. Changes in QRS duration at initiation of ventricular pacing at cycle lengths of 400 and 500 msec were used to evaluate the kinetics of drug action. Mean time constants for each drug were similar to values for Vmax depression reported in vitro studies: flecainide, 24.9 +/- 11.6 beats in eight patients (versus 34.5 beats reported for Vmax block); propafenone, 17.8 +/- 6.9 beats in five patients (versus 8.4-20.8 beats); quinidine, 7.0 +/- 2.4 beats in six patients (versus 5.6-6.2 beats); and amiodarone, 3.6 +/- 2.0 beats for eight patients (versus 3.0 beats). Time constants were significantly different among the various drugs tested (p = 0.0002 at a cycle length of 400 msec; p = 0.002 at 500 msec), and there was a strong correlation (r = 0.89, p less than 0.0001) between values obtained at a cycle length of 400 msec and those at a cycle length of 500 msec. No rate-dependent changes in QRS duration were seen at onset of ventricular pacing among eight age- and disease-matched control patients not taking class I antiarrhythmic drugs, including three patients subsequently showing such changes during type I antiarrhythmic drug therapy.

CONCLUSIONS

We conclude that class I agents produce use-dependent QRS prolongation in humans with characteristic kinetics for each agent that are similar to the kinetics of Vmax depression in vitro. These results suggest that rate-dependent ventricular conduction slowing by antiarrhythmic drugs in humans is due to use-dependent sodium channel blockade.

Regional pharmacokinetics. I. Physiological and physicochemical basis

Systemic pharmacokinetics is the study of the time-course of drug concentrations in 'systemic' blood sampled from either an arterial, central venous or peripheral venous blood vessel. It is generally not suitable for studying the pharmacokinetics of drugs in individual organs of the body, when the blood concentrations of a drug are changing rapidly, or when the physiological or pathophysiological status of a patient is unstable. Regional pharmacokinetics addresses some of these limitations and is based on the study of the factors influencing drug concentrations in specific regions (tissues, organs) of the body due to the movement of drug from blood into and out of the region (drug 'uptake' and 'elution', respectively). It provides a vital link between systemic pharmacokinetics and molecular pharmacology. The physiological basis of regional pharmacokinetics is a function of the interactions of the drug between the cells and proteins in blood, the blood flow supplying a region, the structure of the capillaries of the region and the types of specific and non-specific binding within the region. The physicochemical basis of regional pharmacokinetics is a function of the factors influencing the rate and extent of diffusion of a drug through aqueous and lipid mediums, such as molecular weight, ionization, charge, and lipophilicity.

Reassessment of benefit-risk ratio and treatment algorithms for antiarrhythmic drug therapy after the cardiac arrhythmia suppression trial

The Cardiac Arrhythmia Suppression Trial (CAST) has led to serious reconsideration of both the benefit-risk ratio of antiarrhythmic drug therapy and the appropriate therapeutic approach to various cardiac arrhythmias. Class IC drugs, such as encainide and flecainide, should not be used to treat asymptomatic postinfarction arrhythmias. Furthermore, because the CAST raises serious questions about the concept of treating asymptomatic but "potentially malignant" (prognostically important) arrhythmias guided by ambulatory monitoring, the prophylactic use of any of the antiarrhythmic agents (except beta blockers) must be considered inappropriate and potentially harmful until otherwise established by specific clinical trials. For prophylaxis of malignant ventricular arrhythmias (sustained ventricular tachycardia or ventricular fibrillation), treatment may still begin with standard agents in classes IA, IB, or both, preferably guided by electrophysiologic testing alone or in combination with noninvasive testing. Class IC therapy may be most useful in those patients in this group who do not have such high-risk characteristics for proarrhythmia as a history of multiple myocardial infarctions (MIs), congestive heart failure, or low ejection fraction. Amiodarone is moderately effective for treating these arrhythmias but is reserved as second- or third-line therapy because of its potential organ toxicity. Sotalol, a beta blocker with class III activity, is often effective and relatively well tolerated in these patients and may become a preferred drug when approved. For symptomatic but nonmalignant ventricular arrhythmias, a more conservative approach is more appropriate than in the past, with therapy reversed for those with debilitating symptoms. An initial trial of beta blockade is often appropriate before class I agents are considered.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Do antiarrhythmic drugs work? Some reflections on the implications of the Cardiac Arrhythmia Suppression Trial

Despite major advances in our understanding of the mechanisms of cardiac arrhythmias and how antiarrhythmic drugs appear to work, there remains much doubt whether these agents reduce arrhythmic mortality except in certain subsets of patients. The results of the Cardiac Arrhythmia Suppression Trial (CAST) have indicated that certain antiarrhythmic drugs not only "fail to work" but may substantially increase mortality. The effects of Class Ic agents in CAST and the meta-analysis of randomized antiarrhythmic trials in the survivors of acute infarction suggest that drugs that act primarily by delaying conduction are particularly deleterious in the survivors of acute infarction. Whether these data have a wide applicability in terms of all ventricular arrhythmias is unclear, but beta-blockers remain the only class of agents that in control trials have been shown to reduce sudden death. The effect appears to be related to beta-blockade and not to suppression of premature ventricular contractions (PVCs). Beta blockers appear to act by preventing ventricular fibrillation. It is reasonable to assume that PVC suppression per se is unlikely to produce a reduction in sudden death. Uncontrolled data with amiodarone suggests that it has the potential to prolong survival by controlling arrhythmias. The effects of amiodarone and beta blockers, both significantly attenuating adrenergic stimulation, provide pharmacologic probes to define the crucial determinants of efficacy of a compound for mortality reduction in high risk survivors of myocardial infarction. The focus must now shift from antiectopic and antiarrhythmic agents that delay conduction to those that exert antifibrillatory actions by sympathetic antagonism and those that exhibit the added property of lengthening myocardial refractoriness.

Proarrhythmic potential of moricizine: strengths and limitations of a data base analysis

Moricizine was studied in 908 patients with ventricular arrhythmias. A proarrhythmia occurred in 29 (3.2%). When the severity of the proarrhythmia and the type of presenting ventricular arrhythmia were correlated, no proarrhythmic events occurred in patients who presented with benign ventricular arrhythmias. Four deaths were attributed to the proarrhythmic effects of moricizine. Of these, 3 occurred in patients presenting with lethal ventricular arrhythmias. A total of 15 serious proarrhythmic events occurred, all of which resolved without lethal consequence. The overall proarrhythmia incidence in the lethal and potentially lethal ventricular arrhythmia categories was not different (3.2 vs 3.7%, respectively). Thus, a proarrhythmia occurred in patients with more advanced structural heart disease, and occurred almost exclusively in patients who presented with potentially lethal or lethal ventricular arrhythmia. There was no relation between the dose of moricizine and the incidence of proarrhythmic events. Of the 29 proarrhythmic events, 26 occurred within 7 days (90%) of the initiation of moricizine therapy. Thus, moricizine appears to have a low proarrhythmic potential in the populations tested, including patients presenting with lethal ventricular arrhythmias. The implications of the Cardiac Arrhythmia Suppression Trial on such a data base analysis are discussed.

The Cardiac Arrhythmia Suppression Trial: background, interim results and implications

The Cardiac Arrhythmia Suppression Trial (CAST) was designed to test the hypothesis that suppression of ventricular premature complexes (VPCs) in survivors of acute myocardial infarction would reduce arrhythmic death risk. Instead, a preliminary finding from the CAST was that the encainide and flecainide groups had a 3.6-fold increase in arrhythmic death compared with their placebo group. These unfortunate results were especially surprising in that the CAST population represented patients in whom the risk of arrhythmic death was only moderate and the risk of proarrhythmia was thought to be low. In contrast, the arrhythmic death rate of the CAST placebo group was unusually low, to the extent that it paralleled the arrhythmic death rate in previous clinical trials of patients surviving myocardial infarction with no ventricular arrhythmia. The excessive arrhythmic death rate in patients taking encainide and flecainide occurred over the duration of the CAST, implying a proarrhythmic effect that may be due to mechanisms that are unique in this population, and thus challenging traditional concepts of proarrhythmia. The existing knowledge regarding the proarrhythmic and negative inotropic effects of encainide and flecainide are reviewed. The previous pharmaceutical database experience with these 2 antiarrhythmic drugs exceeded 3,000 patients; however, there was no indication of this serious proarrhythmic effect. In contrast, the CAST population taking encainide and flecainide totaled only 725 patients who were followed for 10 months and had an extremely high proarrhythmic event rate. The reasons for this discrepancy are discussed. The results of the CAST emphasize the power of a randomized, placebo-controlled clinical trial to uncover previously unsuspected benefits or liabilities of traditional therapies.