2
|
Douville C, Moinova HR, Thota PN, Shaheen NJ, Iyer PG, Canto MI, Wang JS, Dumot JA, Faulx A, Kinzler KW, Papadopoulos N, Vogelstein B, Markowitz SD, Bettegowda C, Willis JE, Chak A. Massively Parallel Sequencing of Esophageal Brushings Enables an Aneuploidy-Based Classification of Patients With Barrett's Esophagus. Gastroenterology 2021; 160:2043-2054.e2. [PMID: 33493502 PMCID: PMC8141353 DOI: 10.1053/j.gastro.2021.01.209] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/12/2020] [Revised: 01/04/2021] [Accepted: 01/13/2021] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND & AIMS Aneuploidy has been proposed as a tool to assess progression in patients with Barrett's esophagus (BE), but has heretofore required multiple biopsies. We assessed whether a single esophageal brushing that widely sampled the esophagus could be combined with massively parallel sequencing to characterize aneuploidy and identify patients with disease progression to dysplasia or cancer. METHODS Esophageal brushings were obtained from patients without BE, with non-dysplastic BE (NDBE), low-grade dysplasia (LGD), high-grade dysplasia (HGD), or adenocarcinoma (EAC). To assess aneuploidy, we used RealSeqS, a technique that uses a single primer pair to interrogate ∼350,000 genome-spanning regions and identify specific chromosome arm alterations. A classifier to distinguish NDBE from EAC was trained on results from 79 patients. An independent validation cohort of 268 subjects was used to test the classifier at distinguishing patients at successive phases of BE progression. RESULTS Aneuploidy progression was associated with gains of 1q, 12p, and 20q and losses on 9p and 17p. The entire chromosome 8q was often gained in NDBE, whereas focal gain of 8q24 was identified only when there was dysplasia. Among validation subjects, a classifier incorporating these features with a global measure of aneuploidy scored positive in 96% of EAC, 68% of HGD, but only 7% of NDBE. CONCLUSIONS RealSeqS analysis of esophageal brushings provides a practical and sensitive method to determine aneuploidy in BE patients. It identifies specific chromosome changes that occur early in NDBE and others that occur late and mark progression to dysplasia. The clinical implications of this approach can now be tested in prospective trials.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christopher Douville
- Department of Oncology, the Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland; The Ludwig Center, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland; The Sol Goldman Pancreatic Cancer Research Center, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland; Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Helen R Moinova
- Department of Medicine, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio
| | - Prashanthi N Thota
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, Ohio
| | - Nicholas J Shaheen
- Center for Esophageal Diseases and Swallowing, Department of Medicine, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina
| | - Prasad G Iyer
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
| | - Marcia Irene Canto
- Department of Oncology, the Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland; Department of Medicine, Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Jean S Wang
- Department of Medicine, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, Missouri
| | - John A Dumot
- Department of Medicine, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio
| | - Ashley Faulx
- Department of Medicine, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio
| | - Kenneth W Kinzler
- Department of Oncology, the Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland; The Ludwig Center, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland; The Sol Goldman Pancreatic Cancer Research Center, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland; Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Nickolas Papadopoulos
- Department of Oncology, the Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland; The Ludwig Center, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland; The Sol Goldman Pancreatic Cancer Research Center, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland; Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland; Department of Pathology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Bert Vogelstein
- Department of Oncology, the Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland; The Ludwig Center, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland; The Sol Goldman Pancreatic Cancer Research Center, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland; Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland; The Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Sanford D Markowitz
- Department of Medicine, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio; Case Comprehensive Cancer Center, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio; Seidman Cancer Center, University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center, Cleveland, Ohio.
| | - Chetan Bettegowda
- Department of Oncology, the Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland; The Ludwig Center, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland; The Sol Goldman Pancreatic Cancer Research Center, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland; Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland; Department of Neurosurgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Joseph E Willis
- Case Comprehensive Cancer Center, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio; Seidman Cancer Center, University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center, Cleveland, Ohio; Department of Pathology, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio
| | - Amitabh Chak
- Department of Medicine, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio; Case Comprehensive Cancer Center, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio; Seidman Cancer Center, University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center, Cleveland, Ohio.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Frei NF, Konté K, Duits LC, Klaver E, Ten Kate FJ, Offerhaus GJ, Meijer SL, Visser M, Seldenrijk CA, Schoon EJ, Weusten BLAM, Schenk BE, Mallant-Hent RC, Bergman JJ, Pouw RE. The SpaTemp cohort: 168 nondysplastic Barrett's esophagus surveillance patients with and without progression to early neoplasia to evaluate the distribution of biomarkers over space and time. Dis Esophagus 2020; 34:5907935. [PMID: 32944737 PMCID: PMC9155949 DOI: 10.1093/dote/doaa095] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/18/2020] [Accepted: 08/11/2020] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
The ReBus cohort is a matched nested case-control cohort of patients with nondysplastic (ND) Barrett's esophagus (BE) at baseline who progressed (progressors) or did not progress (nonprogressors) to high-grade dysplasia (HGD) or cancer. This cohort is constructed using the most stringent inclusion criteria to optimize explorative studies on biomarkers predicting malignant progression in NDBE. These explorative studies may benefit from expanding the number of cases and by incorporating samples that allow assessment of the biomarker over space (spatial variability) and over time (temporal variability). To (i) update the ReBus cohort by identifying new progressors and (ii) identify progressors and nonprogressors within the updated ReBus cohort containing spatial and temporal information. The ReBus cohort was updated by identifying Barrett's patients referred for endoscopic work-up of neoplasia at 4 tertiary referral centers. Progressors and nonprogressors with a multilevel (spatial) endoscopy and additional prior (temporal) endoscopies were identified to evaluate biomarkers over space and over time. The original ReBus cohort consisted of 165 progressors and 723 nonprogressors. We identified 65 new progressors meeting the same strict selection criteria, resulting in a total number of 230 progressors and 723 matched nonprogressors in the updated ReBus cohort. Within the updated cohort, 61 progressors and 107 nonprogressors (mean age 61 ± 10 years) with a spatial endoscopy (median level 3 [2-4]) were identified. 33/61 progressors and 50/107 nonprogressors had a median of 3 (2-4) additional temporal endoscopies. Our updated ReBus cohort consists of 230 progressors and 723 matched nonprogressors using the most strict selection criteria. In a subgroup of 168 Barrett's patients (the SpaTemp cohort), multiple levels have been sampled at baseline and during follow-up providing a unique platform to study spatial and temporal distribution of biomarkers in BE.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- N F Frei
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Amsterdam UMC, location Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - K Konté
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Amsterdam UMC, location Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - L C Duits
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Amsterdam UMC, location Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - E Klaver
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Amsterdam UMC, location Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - F J Ten Kate
- Department of Pathology, University Medical Center, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - G J Offerhaus
- Department of Pathology, University Medical Center, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - S L Meijer
- Department of Pathology, Amsterdam UMC, location Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - M Visser
- Department of Pathology, Symbiant BV, Zaans Medical Center, Zaandam, The Netherlands
| | - C A Seldenrijk
- Department of Pathology, Pathology-DNA BV, St. Antonius Hospital, Nieuwegein, The Netherlands
| | - E J Schoon
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Catharina Hospital, Eindhoven, The Netherlands
| | - B L A M Weusten
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, St. Antonius Hospital, Nieuwegein, The Netherlands
| | - B E Schenk
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Isala Klinieken, Zwolle, The Netherlands
| | - R C Mallant-Hent
- Department of Gastroenterology, Flevo Hospital, Almere, the Netherlands
| | - J J Bergman
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Amsterdam UMC, location Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - R E Pouw
- Address correspondence to: R. E. Pouw, MD, PhD, Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Amsterdam UMC, location Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|