Esophageal contractility increases and gastroesophageal reflux does not worsen after lung transplantation

Esophageal Function Testing Patterns in the Evaluation and Management of Lung Transplantation: Results of a National Survey

GOALS

We surveyed esophageal motility laboratories affiliated with adult pulmonary transplant centers to determine esophageal function testing (EFT) practices.

BACKGROUND

Gastroesophageal reflux and esophageal dysmotility are associated with worse lung transplant outcomes, yet no consensus guidelines for EFT exist in this population.

STUDY

A deidentified online survey was sent to gastrointestinal motility laboratory directors of 49 academic and community-affiliated medical centers that perform lung transplants. Practice characteristics, including annual lung transplant volume and institutional EFT practices pre-lung transplantation and post-lung transplantation were queried. Respondents were categorized by transplant volume into small and large programs based on median annual volume.

RESULTS

Among 35 respondents (71% response rate), the median annual transplant volume was 37, and there were 18 large programs. Institutional EFT protocols were used pretransplant by 24 programs (68.6%) and post-transplant by 12 programs (34.2%). Among small and large programs, 52.9% and 72.2% always obtained high-resolution manometry before transplant, respectively. Endoscopy before transplant was performed more often in small programs (n=17, 100%) compared with large programs (n=15,83.3%). Pretransplant endoscopy ( P =0.04), barium esophagram ( P <0.01), and high-resolution manometry ( P =0.04) were more common than post-transplant. In contrast, post-transplant reflux monitoring off-therapy was more common than pretransplant ( P =0.01). In general, pulmonologists direct referrals for EFT and gastroenterology consultation (n=28, 80.0%), with symptoms primarily prompting testing.

CONCLUSIONS

In the absence of established guidelines, substantial variability exists in pretransplant and post-transplant EFT, directed by pulmonologists. Standardized EFT protocols and gastroenterologist-directed management of esophageal dysfunction has potential to improve lung transplant outcomes.

A practical approach to ineffective esophageal motility

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Ineffective esophageal motility (IEM) is the most frequently diagnosed esophageal motility abnormality and characterized by diminished esophageal peristaltic vigor and frequent weak, absent, and/or fragmented peristalsis on high-resolution esophageal manometry. Despite its commonplace occurrence, this condition can often provoke uncertainty for both patients and clinicians. Although the diagnostic criteria used to define this condition has generally become more stringent over time, it is unclear whether the updated criteria result in a more precise clinical diagnosis. While IEM is often implicated with symptoms of dysphagia and gastroesophageal reflux disease, the strength of these associations remains unclear. In this review, we share a practical approach to IEM highlighting its definition and evolution over time, commonly associated clinical symptoms, and important management and treatment considerations. We also share the significance of this condition in patients undergoing evaluation for anti-reflux surgery and consideration for lung transplantation.

The impact of lung transplantation on esophageal motility and inter-relationships with reflux and lung mechanics in patients with restrictive and obstructive respiratory disease

BACKGROUND

For many patients with lung disease the only proven intervention to improve survival and quality of life is lung transplantation (LTx). Esophageal dysmotility and gastroesophageal reflux (GER) are common in patients with respiratory disease, and often associate with worse prognosis following LTx. Which, if any patients, should be excluded from LTx based on esophageal concerns remains unclear. Our aim was to understand the effect of LTx on esophageal motility diagnosis and examine how this and the other physiological and mechanical factors relate to GER and clearance of boluses swallowed.

METHODS

We prospectively recruited 62 patients with restrictive (RLD) and obstructive (OLD) lung disease (aged 33-75 years; 42 men) who underwent high resolution impedance manometry and 24-h pH-impedance before and after LTx.

KEY RESULTS

RLD patients with normal motility were more likely to remain normal (p = 0.02), or if having abnormal motility to change to normal (p = 0.07) post-LTx than OLD patients. Esophageal length (EL) was greater in OLD than RLD patients' pre-LTx (p < 0.001), reducing only in OLD patients' post-LTx (p = 0.02). Reduced EL post-LTx associated with greater contractile reserve (r = 0.735; p = 0.01) and increased likelihood of motility normalization (p = 0.10). Clearance of reflux improved (p = 0.01) and associated with increased mean nocturnal baseline impedance (p < 0.001) in RLD but not OLD. Peristaltic breaks and thoraco-abdominal pressure gradient impact both esophageal clearance of reflux and boluses swallowed (p < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS AND INFERENCES

RLD patients are more likely to show improvement in esophageal motility than OLD patients post-LTx. However, the effect on GER is more difficult to predict and requires other GI, anatomical and pulmonary factors to be taken into consideration.

Pulmonary and esophageal function in lung transplantation: Fundamental principles and clinical application

The lungs and esophagus have a close anatomical and physiological relationship. Over the years, reflux-induced pulmonary injury has gained wider recognition, but the full effects of pulmonary disease on esophageal function are still unknown. Intrathoracic pressure dynamics potentially affect esophageal function, especially in patients with end-stage lung disease, both obstructive and restrictive. Lung transplantation is the only viable option for patients with end-stage pulmonary disease and has provided us with a unique opportunity to study these effects as transplantation restores the intrathoracic environment. Esophageal and foregut functional testing before and after transplantation provide insights into the pathophysiology of the foregut-pulmonary axis, such as how underlying pulmonary disease and intrathoracic pressure changes affect esophageal physiology. This review summarizes the available literature and shares the research experience of a lung transplant center, covering topics such as pre- and posttransplant foregut function, esophageal motility in lung transplant recipients, immune-mediated mechanisms of graft rejection associated with gastroesophageal reflux, and the role of antireflux surgery in this population.

Acute transcutaneous electrical stimulation (TES) augments esophageal contractility in patients with weak peristalsis

BACKGROUND

Lung transplantation (LTx) remains controversial in patients with absent peristalsis (AP) given the increased risk for gastroesophageal reflux (GER), and chronic lung allograft dysfunction. Furthermore, specific treatments to facilitate LTx in those with AP have not been widely described. Transcutaneous Electrical Stimulation (TES) has been reported to improve foregut contractility in LTx patients and therefore we hypothesize that TES may augment the esophageal motility of patients with ineffective esophageal motility (IEM).

METHODS

We included 49 patients, 14 with IEM, 5 with AP, and 30 with normal motility. All subjects underwent standard high-resolution manometry and intraluminal impedance (HRIM) with additional swallows as TES was delivered.

RESULTS

TES induced a universal impedance change observable in real-time by a characteristic spike activity. TES significantly augmented the contractile vigor of the esophagus measured by the distal contractile integral (DCI) in patients with IEM [median DCI (IQR) 0 (238) mmHg-cm-s off TES vs. 333 (858) mmHg-cm-s on TES; p = .01] and normal peristalsis [median DCI (IQR) 1545 (1840) mmHg-cm-s off TES vs. 2109 (2082) mmHg-cm-s on TES; p = .01]. Interestingly, TES induced measurable contractile activity (DCI > 100 mmHg-cm-s) in three out of five patients with AP [median DCI (IQR) 0 (0) mmHg-cm-s off TES vs. 0 (182) mmHg-cm-s on TES; p < .001].

CONCLUSION

TES acutely augmented contractile vigor in patients with normal and weak/ AP. The use of TES may positively impact LTx candidacy, and outcomes for patients with IEM/AP. Nevertheless, further studies are needed to determine the long-term effects of TES in this patient population.

Acid exposure time is sensitive for detecting gastroesophageal reflux disease and is associated with long-term survival after lung transplant

Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is common in patients who have undergone lung transplantation and is associated with poorer outcomes, but guidelines are lacking to direct management strategies in this population. We assessed the diagnostic yield of impedance metrics compared to pH-metry alone for detecting GERD among lung transplant recipients and evaluated their association with clinical outcomes. We performed a retrospective cohort study of consecutive patients who underwent lung transplantation. Demographic data, acid exposure time (AET), number of reflux episodes, mean nocturnal baseline impedance (MNBI), post-reflux swallowing-induced peristaltic wave index (PSPWI), and clinical outcomes including mortality were collected. The relationship between GERD metrics and clinical outcomes was assessed using Wilcoxon signed-rank test and Fisher's exact test as appropriate. Of the 76 patients studied, 29 (38%) had GERD based on abnormal AET after lung transplantation. One (1.3%) patient had GERD based on elevated number of reflux episodes and abnormal distal MNBI detected GERD in 19 (26%) patients, resulting in 62% sensitivity and 94% specificity. Two (2.6%) patients had normal PSPWI. Patients with low distal MNBI had significantly decreased forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1) at 3-year posttransplant compared to those without low distal MNBI (P = 0.03). Three-year survival was significantly worse among patients with elevated AET (66.7% vs. 89.1%, P = 0.03) but not with low distal MNBI (68.4% vs. 84.3%, P = 0.18). Abnormal AET is more sensitive for detecting GERD than other reflux metrics studied and is associated with survival, suggesting pH-metry alone may be sufficient to guide GERD management after lung transplant.

Characterizing Swallowing Impairment in a Post-Lung Transplant Population

BACKGROUND

Lung transplant recipients carry significant pre- and post-lung transplant dysphagia risk factors related to altered respiratory-swallow coordination as well as acute injury and decompensation resulting in the acute post-lung transplant recovery period. However, we are only beginning to understand the potential physiological contributors to altered swallowing in this population.

METHOD

A retrospective, cross-sectional, cohort study of post-lung transplant patients was performed. All participants received a modified barium swallow study (MBSS) as part of standard care during their acute hospitalization using the Modified Barium Swallow Impairment Profile (MBSImP) protocol and scoring metric. A combination of MBSImP scores, Penetration-Aspiration Scale (PAS) scores, Functional Oral Intake Scale (FOIS) scores, International Dysphagia Diet Standardization Initiative (IDDSI) scale levels, and the time from lung transplant to MBSS was collected, as well as measures of swallowing impairment and swallowing-related outcomes. Differences in swallowing physiology and swallowing-related outcomes between participants with typical versus atypical PAS were explored.

RESULTS

Forty-two participants met our prespecified inclusion criteria. We identified atypical laryngeal penetration and/or aspiration in 52.4% of our post-lung transplant cohort. Silent aspiration occurred in 75% of those patients who aspirated. Comparing typical versus atypical PAS scores, we found statistically significant associations with laryngeal elevation (Component 8), p < .0001; anterior hyoid excursion (Component 9), p = .0046; epiglottic movement (Component 10), p = .0031; laryngeal vestibule closure (Component 11), p < .0001; pharyngeal stripping (Component 12), p = .0058; pharyngeal total scores, p = .0001; FOIS scores, p = .00264; and IDDSI liquid levels, p = .0009.

CONCLUSIONS

Swallowing impairment resulting in abnormal bolus invasion is prevalent in post-lung transplant patients. Airway invasion in this cohort was related to pharyngeal swallow impairment and resulted in modified oral intake. Our findings help expand upon prior literature, which only reported the incidence of aspiration and pathological laryngeal penetration. Our results suggest that the potential for aerodigestive system impairment and negative sequela should not be underestimated in the post-lung transplant population.

Updates in interaction of gastroesophageal reflux disease and extragastroesophageal digestive diseases

INTRODUCTION

Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is one of the common chronic diseases with prevalence increasing in the last decades. Because of its prevalence and chronicity, GERD affects the quality of life and increases health-care costs. Gastroesophageal diseases leading to GERD have been thoroughly studied, while extragastroesophageal digestive diseases (EGEDDs) may coexist with GERD and affect the occurrence and persistence of GERD symptoms and therapeutic effect.

AREAS COVERED

In this review, we aim to summarize the EGEDDs correlated with GERD and explore the potential mechanisms of this interaction.

EXPERT OPINION

Individuals with troublesome GERD symptoms may have some common gastroesophageal etiologies, but EGEDDs may also overlap and impact on the progression of GERD, which are often ignored in clinic. The lesions in the small intestine, colon, and hepatobiliary tract as well as functional bowel disorders had positive or negative associations with GERD through potential mechanisms. These diseases aggravate GERD symptoms, increase the esophageal acid burden, cause esophageal hypersensitivity, and finally affect the response to therapy in GERD patients. Therefore, it is necessary to clear the interaction between GERD and EGEDDs and their mechanisms.

Esophageal Dysfunction in Post-lung Transplant: An Enigma

The prevalence of lung transplants has increased over the years, albeit with a low survival rate amongst all solid organ transplants, including liver and heart transplantation. Microaspiration is one of the primary mechanisms that has been implicated in the pathogenesis of lung injury following lung transplants. Of late, esophageal dysfunction such as gastroesophageal reflux and esophageal hypercontractility is often noted post-lung transplant. However, reflux is associated with chronic allograft lung injury such as bronchiolitis obliterans syndrome, which is one of the predictors for long-term survival in this specialized population. Its role in acute lung injury post-lung transplant is still being explored. This review critically examines the salient points which provide the current understanding of the characteristics, pathophysiology, and implications of esophageal dysfunction following lung transplant.

Sorting out the Relationship Between Esophageal and Pulmonary Disease

The aim of this review is to explore the relationship between esophageal syndromes and pulmonary diseases considering the most recent data available. Prior studies have shown a close relationship between lung diseases such as asthma, chronic obstructive pulmonary disorders (COPD), Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF), and lung transplant rejection and esophageal dysfunction. Although the association has long been demonstrated, the exact relationship remains unclear. Clinical experience has shown a bidirectional relationship where esophageal disease may influence the outcomes of pulmonary disease and vice versa. The impact of esophageal dysfunction on pulmonary disorders may also be related to 2 different mechanisms: the reflux pathway leading to microaspiration and the reflex pathway triggering vagally mediated airway reactions. The aim of this review is to further explore these relationships and pathophysiologic mechanisms. Specifically, we discuss the proposed hypotheses for the relationship between the 2 diseases, as well as the pathophysiology and new developments in clinical management.

Predictors of Abnormal Functional Luminal Impedance Planimetry Findings in Non-mechanical Esophagogastric Junction Outflow Obstruction

BACKGROUND

Esophagogastric junction outflow obstruction (EGJOO) is a common but nonspecific motility pattern identified by esophageal high-resolution manometry (HRM). Functional luminal impedance planimetry (FLIP) provides information regarding lower esophageal sphincter (LES) mechanics, which can identify achalasia spectrum disorders and is useful in evaluating EGJOO. However, the relationship between HRM and FLIP parameters in EGJOO is not clearly defined.

AIMS

To identify predictors of abnormal FLIP findings in patients with non-mechanical EGJOO.

METHODS

This is a retrospective cohort study of patients with non-mechanical EGJOO who underwent FLIP between 10/1/16 and 7/1/19. Demographic data including age and gender, examination indication, concomitant medications, HRM parameters, symptom burden, and FLIP metrics of diameter and distensibility index (DI) were collected. DI was categorized as not low (DI > 2.8), borderline low (DI 1.1-2.8), and definitely low (DI ≤ 1). Kruskal-Wallis and Fisher's exact tests were used to assess the relationship between HRM and FLIP parameters and to identify predictors of abnormal FLIP.

RESULTS

Among the 44 patients studied, most were female (n = 33, 75%) and the median age was 63. The median IRP was 18.2, and 10 (23%) patients used chronic narcotics. Lower total heartburn and regurgitation scores, and LES diameter by FLIP are associated with definitely low DI.

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with non-mechanical EGJOO, reflux burden scores and FLIP diameters can aid in predicting DI. These results may provide useful adjunctive data to help in differentiating which patients have meaningful outflow obstruction.

Foregut Dysmotility in the Lung Transplant Patient

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

To explore the role of upper gastrointestinal disease in the clinical course of lung transplant patients - including its pathophysiology, diagnostic testing, and treatment options.

RECENT FINDINGS

Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) and foregut motility disorders are more prevalent among end-stage lung disease patients and are associated with poorer outcomes in lung transplant recipients. A proposed mechanism is the exposure of the lung allograft to aspirated contents, resulting in inflammation and rejection. Diagnostic tools to assess for these disorders include multichannel intraluminal impedance and pH (MII-pH) testing, high resolution esophageal manometry (HREM), and gastric emptying scintigraphy. The main treatment options are medical management with acid suppressants and/or prokinetic agents and anti-reflux surgery. In particular, data support the use of early anti-reflux surgery to improve outcomes. Newer diagnostic tools such as MII-pH testing and HREM allow for the identification of both acid and non-acid reflux and esophageal motility disorders, respectively. Recent studies have demonstrated that early anti-reflux surgery within six months post-transplant better protects against allograft injury and pulmonary function decline when compared to late surgery. However, further prospective research is needed to evaluate the short and long-term outcomes of these diagnostic approaches and interventions.

Identification of Lung Transplant Recipients with a Survival Benefit after Fundoplication

BACKGROUND

Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) and aspiration of enteric contents is associated with worse outcomes after lung transplant. The purpose of this study is to elucidate populations that benefit the most from fundoplication after lung transplant.

METHODS

Lung transplants from 2001-2019 (n=971) were retrospectively reviewed and stratified by a fundoplication before (n=128) or after (n=24) chronic lung allograft dysfunction (CLAD) development vs those who didn't. Patients with a fundoplication prior to CLAD were propensity-matched to those without a fundoplication. The primary outcome of interest was post-transplant survival. Time-to-event rates were calculated using a multivariable Cox proportional hazards model and Kaplan-Meier functions.

RESULTS

A fundoplication prior to CLAD improved post-transplant survival before and after propensity-matching, and remained a significant predictor after adjusting for baseline characteristics (HR:0.57, 95% CI:0.4-0.8, P=0.001). Recipients with a restrictive disorder (HR: 0.46, 95% CI:0.3-0.73, P=0.001), age <65 (HR:0.48, 95% CI:0.32-0.71, P<0.001), and both single (HR:0.47, 95% CI:0.28-0.79, P=0.005) or double (HR:0.55, 95% CI:0.32-0.93, P=0.027) lung transplants had a significant decrease in mortality after fundoplication. The effect was present after excluding early deaths and/or CLAD diagnoses. GERD diagnosed by pH, impedance or EGD was not associated with worse outcomes. Among patients with CLAD, a fundoplication was an independent predictor of post-CLAD survival (HR:0.27, 95% CI:0.12-0.61, P=0.002).

CONCLUSIONS

A fundoplication before or after CLAD development is an independent predictor of survival. Younger patients with restrictive disease, independent of the type of transplant, have a survival benefit. GERD diagnosed by conventional methods was not associated with worse survival.

Esophageal Motility Disorders Associated With Death or Allograft Dysfunction After Lung Transplantation? Results of a Retrospective Monocentric Study

OBJECTIVES

Pathological gastroesophageal reflux (GER) is a known risk factor for bronchiolitis obliterans syndrome (BOS) after lung transplantation. This study aimed at determining whether functional esophageal evaluation might predict BOS occurrence and survival in this setting.

METHODS

Ninety-three patients who underwent esophageal high-resolution manometry and 24-hour pH-impedance monitoring within the first year after lung transplantation were retrospectively included. A univariable analysis was performed to evaluate the parameters associated with GER disease and BOS occurrence. The Cox regression model was used to identify the prognostic factors of death or retransplantation.

RESULTS

Thirteen percent of patients exhibited major esophageal motility disorders and 20% pathological GER. GER occurrence was associated with younger age, cystic fibrosis, and hypotensive esophagogastric junction. Within a median follow-up of 62 months, 10 patients (11%) developed BOS, and no predictive factors were identified. At the end of the follow-up, 10 patients died and 1 underwent retransplantation. The 5-year cumulative survival rate without retransplantation was lower in patients with major esophageal motility disorders compared with that in those without (75% vs 90%, P = 0.01) and in patients who developed BOS compared with that in those without (66% vs 91%; P = 0.005). However, in multivariable analysis, major esophageal motility disorders and BOS were no longer significant predictors of survival without retransplantation.

DISCUSSION

Major esophageal motility disorders and BOS were associated with allograft survival in lung transplantation in the univariable analysis. Although the causes of this association remain to be determined, this observation confirms that esophageal motor dysfunction should be evaluated in the context of lung transplantation.

Jackhammer Esophagus: Current Concepts and Dilemmas

Jackhammer esophagus (JE) is a recently recognized esophageal motility disorder that is characterized by hypercontractile peristalsis. More than 500 cases have been reported in the literature. Among patients referred for esophageal motility disorders, the prevalence of JE ranges from 0.42% to 9%, with most series describing a prevalence of 2% to 4%. Most cases are women (60.5%). The mean reported age of patients with JE is 65.2 years, and patients commonly have dysphagia (62.8%). Reflux symptoms occur in ∼40% of patients, and chest pain affects more than one-third of patients (36.4%). JE is a heterogenous disorder that is associated with several conditions, including obesity, opioid use, lung transplantation, eosinophilic infiltration of the esophagus, neoplasia, and systemic diseases. The cause and pathogenesis remain unknown, but several observations suggest that it is the result of multiple conditions that likely precipitate increased excitation and abnormal inhibition of neuromuscular function. The natural course of JE also is unknown, but progression to achalasia has been observed in a few patients. Treatment is challenging, in part because of the insufficient understanding of the disorder's underlying mechanisms. Various therapeutic modalities have been used, ranging from observation only to pharmacologic and endoscopic interventions (eg, botulinum toxin injection) to peroral endoscopic myotomy. Treatment efficacy remains largely anecdotal and insufficiently studied.

Esophageal disease in lung transplant patients

There is a very well-established and complex interplay between gastroesophageal reflux and lung disease. This is particularly true in end-stage lung disease and post-lung transplant patients. Numerous studies have shown that in patients who are undergoing pre-lung transplant evaluations for diseases such as idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF), emphysema, connective tissue disease, there is a high prevalence of gastroesophageal reflux and esophageal dysmotility. Post-lung transplant, many of the reflux issues persist or worsen, and there is some evidence to suggest that this leads to worsened long-term allograft function and bronchiolitis obliterans. Anti-reflux operations in patients with lung disease have been shown to be safe in both the pre and post-lung transplant setting and lead to improved reflux symptoms, as well as protecting against reflux induced allograft dysfunction in the post-lung transplant patients. Barrett’s esophagus and esophageal malignancy are also not unheard of in these patients, and select patients may benefit from operative intervention. This review discusses the links between gastroesophageal reflux and lung transplant patients in both the pre and post-transplant setting. We also review the approach to the workup of esophageal disease in the pre-lung transplant setting as well as the surgical management of this unique group of patients.

Jackhammer esophagus: A meta-analysis of patient demographics, disease presentation, high-resolution manometry data, and treatment outcomes

BACKGROUND

Jackhammer esophagus (JE) is a newly described esophageal motility disorder. However, there are limited data on JE and this entity remains misunderstood.

METHODS

We performed a systematic review of clinical series on JE through MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Web of Science. Data from included studies were then extracted, and random-effects meta-analyses were performed.

RESULTS

Thirty-eight studies met inclusion criteria. The pooled prevalence of JE was 1.97% [95% CI: 1.39%-2.78%] among patients referred for high-resolution manometry (HRM). The mean age at diagnosis was 60.8 years [95% CI: 57.1-64.4] and 65% [95% CI: 58%-72%] of patients were female. JE was significantly more prevalent in postlung transplant patients and morbidly obese patients undergoing HRM (23.99% [95% CI: 9.00%-38.97%] and 5.18% [95% CI: 1.76%-14.3%] respectively). Dysphagia was the most common presentation of JE (64% [95% CI: 52%-77%]) followed by gastroesophageal reflux disease (46% [95% CI: 26%-67%]). The pooled mean distal contractile integral (DCI) of all standard HRM swallows was 9249 mm Hg·s·cm [95% CI: 7834-10 663], and the pooled mean integrated relaxation pressure (IRP) was 13.9 mm Hg [95% CI: 8.2-19.7]. Overall, 73.6% [95% CI: 64.0%-83.1%] of JE patients who underwent treatment achieved clinical symptom improvement (79% [95% CI: 74%-85%] for endoscopic treatment and 63% [95% CI: 47%-79%] for medical treatment). The pooled clinical success rate of peroral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) specifically was 82% [95% CI: 75%-90%].

CONCLUSIONS

JE is a new motility disorder most commonly presenting with dysphagia. High clinical suspicion is important because the diagnosis can only be made through HRM.

Esophageal Evaluation for Patients Undergoing Lung Transplant Evaluation: What Should We Do for Evaluation and Management

Lung transplantation is a high-risk, but lifesaving, procedure for patients with end-stage lung disease. Although 1-year survival is high, long-term survival is not nearly as high, due mainly to acute and chronic rejection. Bronchiolitis obliterans syndrome is the most common type of chronic rejection and often leads to poor outcomes. For this reason, esophageal testing in the lung transplant population has become a major issue, and this article discusses the evidence behind esophageal testing, the importance of esophageal dysmotility gastroesophageal reflux disease, both acidic and nonacidic reflux, and aspiration and the treatment of these findings.

Esophageal Function Tests are Not Associated with Barium Swallow Findings in Advanced Lung Disease

Gastroesophageal reflux disease and esophageal dysmotility are common in patients with advanced lung disease (ALD) and are associated with worse outcomes. Assessing esophageal function in these patients is relevant for determining pulmonary transplant eligibility and prognosticating post-transplant outcomes. Barium Swallow (BaS) is a non-invasive testing modality often performed as a complement to formal esophageal function tests (EFTs), but its role and clinical utility in this context is unknown. Therefore, we aimed to determine the relationship between BaS and EFTs with high-resolution manometry (HRM) and 24-h ambulatory pH-metry in patients with ALD. We performed a retrospective study of 226 consecutive patients undergoing evaluation for lung transplantation at a single center. All patients underwent EFTs and BaS independent of clinical history or symptoms per institutional protocol. Appropriate statistical tests were performed to evaluate the relationship between EFTs and BaS. Mucosal, reflux and motility findings were categorized. Abnormal motility was reported in 133 (59%) patients by BaS and 99 (44%) by HRM, with a significant difference in the proportions of patients with abnormal studies (p < 0.01). There were 7 (26%) patients with abnormal barium tablet passage who had normal HRM. The sensitivity (35%) and specificity (77%) for detecting pathologic reflux with BaS was poor. Inducibility of reflux and barium column height were not associated with pH-metry results. No clinically significant luminal irregularities were identified. In conclusion, while BaS can non-invasively assess esophageal mucosa, its findings are not associated with EFTs in patients with ALD.

Minor esophageal functional disorders: are they relevant?

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

High resolution esophageal manometry (HRM) has expanded understanding of esophageal motor function. The Chicago Classification scheme has allowed systematic categorization of the myriad of manometric parameters identified during HRM. Multichannel intraluminal impedance pH has enhanced ambulatory reflux monitoring through complete assessment of esophageal content transit. However, the clinical implications of identified minor esophageal functional disorders remain unclear.

RECENT FINDINGS

Esophagogastric junction outlet obstruction is defined by esophagogastric junction obstruction with preserved peristalsis and may be managed expectantly, or in a manner similar to achalasia. Hypercontractile esophagus has been associated with dysphagia and non-cardiac chest pain, but the clinical significance is unclear as a majority of patients will improve without specific therapy. Additionally, these findings may be confounded by chronic opiate use. Ineffective esophageal motility is characterized by diminished esophageal contraction amplitude, potentially causing dysphagia and GERD. However, this is commonly identified in asymptomatic volunteers and may represent a normal variant. The multiple rapid swallow sequence can assess esophageal contraction reserve, which may predict post fundoplication dysphagia. The post-swallow induced peristaltic wave can serve as a surrogate of gastric refluxate clearance, providing important prognostic value. However, the associated time burden and lack of alternative therapeutic options limit its clinical utility.

SUMMARY

Minor esophageal functional disorders provide new therapeutic targets for symptomatic patients. However, these findings have inconsistent associations with symptoms and poorly defined therapeutic options. Minor esophageal function disorders should not be interpreted in isolation, with management decisions accounting for clinical, endoscopic, and radiographic factors in addition.