Variability in the Distribution of Histological Disease Activity in the Colon of Patients with Ulcerative Colitis

Density of Biopsy Sampling Required to Ensure Accurate Histological Assessment of Inflammation in Active Ulcerative Colitis

BACKGROUND

Histological response to treatment is an important outcome in patients with ulcerative colitis (UC). The accuracy of biopsy-based measurements of inflammation may be limited by error imposed by natural microscopic heterogeneity on the scale of individual biopsies. We determined the magnitude of this error, its histological correlates, and the density of biopsy sampling within mucosal regions of interest required to meet specified benchmarks for accuracy.

METHODS

A total of 994 sequential 1-mm digital microscopic images (virtual biopsies) from consecutive colectomies from patients with clinically severe UC were scored by 2 pathologists. Agreement statistics for Geboes subscores and Nancy (NHI) and Robarts Histological Indices (RHI) between random samples from 1 to 10 biopsies and a reference mean score across a 2-cm region of mucosa were calculated using bootstrapping with 2500 iterations.

RESULTS

The agreement statistics improved across all indices as the biopsy density increased, with the largest proportional gains occurring with addition of the second and third biopsies. One biopsy achieved moderate to good agreement with 95% confidence for NHI and RHI corresponding to scale-specific errors of 0.40 (0.25-0.66) and 3.02 (2.08-5.36), respectively; and 3 biopsies achieved good agreement with 95% confidence corresponding to scale-specific errors of 0.22 (0.14-0.39) and 1.87 (1.19-3.25), respectively. Of the individual histological features, erosions and ulcers had the greatest impact on the agreement statistics.

CONCLUSIONS

In the setting of active colitis, up to 3 biopsy samples per region of interest may be required to overcome microscopic heterogeneity and ensure accurate histological grading.

Biopsies from ulcer edge yield higher histological activity scores than biopsies from non-ulcerated mucosa in active ulcerative colitis

BACKGROUND

The appropriate location for biopsy collection in ulcerative colitis is unknown.

OBJECTIVES

We aimed to determine the location for biopsy collection in the presence of ulcers which yields the highest histopathological score.

DESIGN AND METHODS

This prospective cross-sectional study enrolled patients with ulcerative colitis and ulcers in the colon. Biopsy specimens were obtained at the edge of the ulcer; at a distance of one open forceps (7-8 mm) from the ulcer edge; at a distance of three open forceps (21-24 mm) from the ulcer edge; further referred to as locations 1, 2 and 3 respectively. Histological activity was assessed using Robarts Histopathology Index and the Nancy Histological Index. Statistical analysis was performed using mixed effects models.

RESULTS

A total of 19 patients were included. Decreasing trends with distance from the ulcer edge ( P  < 0.0001) were observed. Biopsies procured from the edge of the ulcer (location 1) yielded a higher histopathological score compared to biopsies procured at locations 2 and 3 ( P  ≤ 0.001).

CONCLUSION

Biopsies from the ulcer edge yield higher histopathological scores than biopsies next to the ulcer. In clinical trials with histological endpoints, biopsies should be obtained from the ulcer edge (if ulcers are present) to reliably assess histological disease activity.

Histologic Activity and Steroid Use History Are Risk Factors of Clinical Relapse in Ulcerative Colitis With Mayo Endoscopic Subscore of 0 or 1

BACKGROUND

The treatment goal of ulcerative colitis (UC) has changed from the control of symptoms to mucosal healing, previously evaluated mainly by endoscopy. Recently, the importance of histologic activity has emerged. Therefore, this study aimed to investigate the risk of clinical relapse according to histologic activity in UC with a Mayo endoscopic subsccore (MES) of 0 or 1.

METHODS

In a retrospective cohort after our center's biopsy guideline for UC was instituted, 492 UC patients with an MES of 0 or 1 were enrolled and analyzed. The primary outcome was the development of a clinical relapse including changes in medication, hospitalization, colectomy, and the development of colorectal cancer during the follow-up period.

RESULTS

During the median 549 days of follow-up, 92 (18.7%) patients had a clinical relapse. All the patients changed their medication, including 4 hospitalized patients. Histologic activity defined by a Geboes score of ≧3.1 (hazard ratio [HR], 1.732; P = .035) and steroid use history (HR, 1.762; P = .008) were independent factors associated with clinical relapse. When stratified, the 1- and 2-year incidence rates of clinical relapse were 4.1% and 10.6%, respectively, for patients with histologic improvement and no steroid use history, whereas the rates were 23.9% and 39.4% for patients with histologic activity and steroid use history.

CONCLUSIONS

In UC with an MES of 0 or 1, histologic activity and steroid use history can be used to stratify the risk of clinical relapse.

Advanced technology for assessment of endoscopic and histological activity in ulcerative colitis: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Advanced endoscopic technologies led to significant progress in the definition of endoscopic remission of ulcerative colitis (UC) and correlate better with histological changes, compared with standard endoscopy. However, while studies have assessed the diagnostic accuracy of endoscope technologies individually, there are currently limited data comparing between technologies. As such, the aim of this systematic review was to pool data from the existing literature and compare the correlations between endoscopy and histologic disease activity scores across endoscope technologies.

METHODS

We searched PubMed and Embase until February 2021 for eligible studies reporting the correlation between endoscopy and histology activity scores in UC. Studies were grouped by endoscope technology as standard-definition white light (SD-WLE), high-definition white light (HD-WLE) or electronic virtual chromoendoscopy (VCE) and comparisons made between these groups.

RESULTS

A total of N = 27 studies were identified, of which N = 12 were included in a meta-analysis of correlations between endoscopic and histological activity scores. Combining these studies identified considerable heterogeneity (I ²: 89-93%) and returned a pooled correlation coefficient (ρ) for the SD-WLE group of 0.74, which did not differ significantly from HD-WLE (ρ: 0.65, p = 0.521) or VCE (ρ: 0.70, p = 0.801). In addition, N = 4 studies reported the accuracy of endoscopic activity scores on WLE and VCE to diagnose histological remission. Pooling these found significantly higher accuracy for VCE, compared with WLE [risk ratio: 1.13, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.07-1.19, p < 0.001].

CONCLUSION

Activity scores assessed using endoscopy are strongly correlated with activity on histology regardless of endoscopic technology. VCE seems to be more accurate in predicting histological remission than WLE. However, given the heterogeneity between the included studies, head-to-head trials are warranted to confirm these findings.

Endoscopic remission assessed with PICaSSO virtual electronic chromendoscopy accurately predicts clinical outcomes in ulcerative colitis

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

A composite endoscopic-histologic remission is increasingly explored as an important endpoint in ulcerative colitis (UC). We investigated combined endoscopic-histologic remission for predicting clinical outcomes at 12 months compared with endoscopic remission alone using the high definition virtual chromoendoscopy (VCE) Paddington International virtual ChromoendoScopy ScOre (PICaSSO) and histology scores.

METHODS

Ulcerative colitis patients, prospectively enrolled from 11 international centres, underwent VCE with targeted biopsies and followed up for 12 months. Endoscopic activity was assessed by Mayo Endoscopic Score (MES), Ulcerative Colitis Endoscopic Index Severity (UCEIS) followed by VCE-PICaSSO. Robarts Histopathological Index|Robarts Histological index≤3 without neutrophils in mucosa, and Nancy Histological index (NHI)≤ 1 were used to define histologic remission. Combined endoscopic-histologic remission was compared with endoscopic remission alone by Cox proportional hazards model and by two- and three-proportion analysis using pre-specified clinical outcomes.

RESULTS

307 patients were recruited and 302 analysed. There was no difference in survival without specified clinical outcomes between PICaSSO defined endoscopic remission alone and endoscopic plus histologic remission in the rectum (HR 0.42, 95%CI 0.16-1.11 and HR 1.03, 95%CI 0.42-2.52 for Robarts Histological index and NHI respectively) at 12 months. There was however a significant survival advantage without specified clinical outcome events for UCEIS combined with histology compared with UCEIS alone (HR 0.30, 95%CI 0.12-0.75, p = 0.02) at 12 months (but not combined with NHI). For MES there was no advantage for predicting specified clinical outcomes at 12 months for endoscopy alone versus endoscopy plus histology, but there were differences in two and three proportion analysis at 6 months.

CONCLUSION

Endoscopic remission by VCE-PICaSSO alone was similar to combined endoscopic and histologic remission for predicting specified clinical outcomes at 12 months. Larger studies with specific therapeutic interventions are required to further confirm the findings.