Luminal Narrowing Alone Allows an Accurate Diagnosis of Crohn's Disease Small Bowel Strictures at Cross-Sectional Imaging

Discordance between MR enterography and endoscopic detection of Crohn's disease ileal strictures: evidence to inform recommendations

PURPOSE

To evaluate correlation between terminal ileal (TI) stricture diagnosis at MR enterography (MRE) and ileocolonoscopy (IC) in patients with Crohn's disease (CD).

METHODS

One hundred and four patients with CD (51% females; 41 ± 15 years) underwent IC and MRE within 3 months in this retrospective case-control study. Positive cases had TI strictures diagnosed by endoscopy (n = 35); or MRE (threshold small bowel dilation ≥ 3cm; n = 34). Negative controls did not have stricture by either modality (n = 35). Three radiologists examined MRE exams, with per-patient stricture diagnosis based on majority agreement. Sensitivity for stricture diagnosis using threshold dilation of 2.5 cm at MRE was also evaluated.

RESULTS

There were 69 CD TI strictures (57 by endoscopy; 43 by MRE). Sensitivity by endoscopy and MRE criteria were 82.6% (57/69) and 62.3% (43/69), respectively, with additional 20.3% (14/69) of MRE exams classified as "probable stricture" by SAR/AGA/SPR criteria. Lowering MRE small bowel dilation threshold to 2.5 cm increased MRE sensitivity for endoscopically-diagnosed strictures to 71.9% (41/57; up from 56.1% [32/57]), without sacrificing interobserver agreement (κ = 0.684 vs. κ = 0.587). Of 25 new patients diagnosed with a TI stricture using a 2.5 cm threshold by 2 or more readers, 96% (24/25) had hospitalization, small bowel obstruction, endoscopic dilation, and/or surgical resection during clinical follow-up. Nine false negative MRE exams had short strictures with bowel dilation ≥ 2.5 cm.

CONCLUSION

Either IC or MRE alone is insufficient to diagnose Crohn's small bowel strictures. Diagnostic criteria should incorporate endoscopic and MRE findings. Lowering threshold dilation to 2.5 cm increases sensitivity in stricture diagnosis and identifies clinically significant strictures.

Evidence-Based Review of Current Cross-Sectional Imaging of Inflammatory Bowel Disease

CT and MR enterography are cross-sectional imaging examinations used in the assessment of inflammatory bowel disease. Consistent reporting and standardized nomenclature are important for clear communication with referring clinicians. Enterography has not only been used to depict inflammation in the small bowel, but it has also been used to quantify disease activity, assess distribution of disease, and detect complications including penetrating disease. This article reviews cross-sectional imaging findings in inflammatory bowel disease, including the current literature focusing on small bowel Crohn's disease and ulcerative colitis, with evidence-based guidelines on appropriate protocols and imaging procedures.

Assessment of intestinal luminal stenosis and prediction of endoscopy passage in Crohn's disease patients using MRI

BACKGROUND

Crohn's disease (CD) is an inflammatory disease of the gastrointestinal tract. The disease behavior changes over time, and endoscopy is crucial in evaluating and monitoring the course of CD. To reduce the economic burden of patients and alleviate the discomfort associated with ineffective examination, it is necessary to fully understand the location, extent, and severity of intestinal stenosis in patients with CD before endoscopy. This study aimed to utilize imaging features of magnetic resonance enterography (MRE) to evaluate intestinal stenosis in patients with CD and to predict whether endoscopy could be passed.

METHODS

MRE data of patients with CD were collected, while age, gender, disease duration, and laboratory test parameters were also gathered. Two radiologists analyzed the images and assessed whether endoscopy could be passed based on the imaging performance. Imaging features of MRE were analyzed in groups based on endoscopy results.

RESULTS

The readers evaluated the imaging performance for 86 patients to determine if endoscopy could be passed and performed a consistency test (compared between two readers k = 0.812, p = 0.000). In the univariate analysis, statistical differences were observed in the degree of T1WI enhancement, thickness of the intestine wall at the stenosis, and diameter of the upstream intestine between the two groups of whether endoscopy was passed. In multivariate logistic regression, the diameter of the upstream intestine was identified to be an independent factor in predicting whether endoscopy was passed or not (OR = 3.260, p = 0.046).

CONCLUSIONS

The utilization of MRE signs for assessing the passage of an endoscope through the narrow segment revealed that the diameter of the upstream intestine emerged as an independent predictor of endoscopic passage. Before performing an endoscopy, MRE can aid in evaluating the passage of the endoscope.

CRITICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT

This retrospective study explored the imaging features of MRE to evaluate intestinal stenosis in patients with Crohn's disease and determined that the diameter of the upstream intestine of the stenotic segment was an independent predictor in assessing endoscopic passage.

KEY POINTS

• Endoscopy is crucial in evaluating and monitoring the course of Crohn's disease. • The diameter of the upstream intestine of the stenotic segment was an independent predictor in assessing endoscopic passage. • MRE can aid in evaluating the passage of the endoscope in stenotic segments of Crohn's disease.

Clinical outcome is distinct between radiological stricture and endoscopic stricture in ileal Crohn's disease

OBJECTIVES

Differences in clinical adverse outcomes (CAO) based on different intestinal stricturing definitions in Crohn's disease (CD) are poorly documented. This study aims to compare CAO between radiological strictures (RS) and endoscopic strictures (ES) in ileal CD and explore the significance of upstream dilatation in RS.

METHODS

This retrospective double-center study included 199 patients (derivation cohort, n = 157; validation cohort, n = 42) with bowel strictures who simultaneously underwent endoscopic and radiologic examinations. RS was defined as a luminal narrowing with wall thickening relative to the normal gut on cross-sectional imaging (group 1 (G1)), which further divided into G1a (without upstream dilatation) and G1b (with upstream dilatation). ES was defined as an endoscopic non-passable stricture (group 2 (G2)). Strictures met the definitions of RS (with or without upstream dilatation) and ES were categorized as group 3 (G3). CAO referred to stricture-related surgery or penetrating disease.

RESULTS

In the derivation cohort, G1b (93.3%) had the highest CAO occurrence rate, followed by G3 (32.6%), G1a (3.2%), and G2 (0%) (p < 0.0001); the same order was found in the validation cohort. The CAO-free survival time was significantly different among the four groups (p < 0.0001). Upstream dilatation (hazard ratio, 1.126) was a risk factor for predicting CAO in RS. Furthermore, when upstream dilatation was added to diagnose RS, 17.6% of high-risk strictures were neglected.

CONCLUSIONS

CAO differs significantly between RS and ES, and clinicians should pay more attention to strictures in G1b and G3. Upstream dilatation has an important impact on the clinical outcome of RS but may not be an essential factor for RS diagnosis.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT

This study explored the definition of intestinal stricture with the greatest significance for the clinical diagnosis and prognosis of patients with CD, and consequently provided effective auxiliary information for clinicians to formulate strategies for the treatment of CD intestinal strictures.

KEY POINTS

• The retrospective double-center study showed that clinical adverse outcome is different between radiological strictures and endoscopic strictures in CD. • Upstream dilatation has an important impact on the clinical outcome of radiological strictures but may not be an essential factor for diagnosis of radiological strictures. • Radiological stricture with upstream dilatation and simultaneous radiological and endoscopic stricture were at increased risk for clinical adverse outcomes; thus, closer monitoring should be considered.

Evaluating the diagnostic accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging in distinguishing strictures in Crohn's disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis

PURPOSE

This systematic review and meta-analysis sought to assess the diagnostic accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in distinguishing fibrotic from inflammatory strictures in Crohn's disease (CD) patients.

METHODS

A rigorous and systematic exploration of five key databases yielded studies that met predefined criteria. Data were extracted for a comprehensive meta-analysis using MetaDiSC and MetaDTA software, providing diagnostic accuracy measures. The Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies 2 (QUADAS-2) tool was utilized for evaluating the methodological quality and potential bias within the studies.

RESULTS

The systematic review involved the evaluation of 7437 records, culminating in the inclusion of 22 studies. In detecting fibrotic strictures in CD patients, MRI exhibited a pooled sensitivity of 85.20% (95% CI: 76.10-91.20%) and specificity of 96.00% (95% CI: 87.80-98.70%). For differentiating fibrotic strictures from inflammatory stenosis, the sensitivity was 81.5% (95% CI: 70.2-89.20%), and the specificity was 97.2% (95% CI: 90.0-99.3%). In terms of assessing the severity of strictures, sensitivity stood at 90.4% (95% CI: 78.1-96.1%) and specificity at 89.4% (95% CI: 57.4-98.2%). The consistency of the diagnostic accuracy was observed across different geographical locations and the various reference tests applied in the studies.

CONCLUSIONS

The results of this meta-analysis underscore the robust diagnostic accuracy of MRI in detecting fibrotic strictures, distinguishing between fibrotic and inflammatory strictures, and evaluating stricture severity in CD patients. These findings support the integration of MRI into standard diagnostic protocols for patients with CD. Further large-scale, multicenter trials are warranted to confirm these results and to identify any potential limitations associated with the application of MRI in this clinical setting.

Intestinal MRI in Inflammatory Bowel Disease - Literature and Survey-Based Recommendations regarding Reporting by the German Radiological Society (DRG) and the German Competence Network for Inflammatory Bowel Diseases

BACKGROUND

MR-enterography/enteroclysis (MRE) is increasingly used for primary diagnosis, detection of complications, and monitoring of patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). Standardization of reporting is relevant to ensure quality of the methodology and to improve communication between different faculties. The current manuscript describes the features that are required for optimized reporting of MRE in IBD.

METHODS

An expert consensus panel of radiologists and gastroenterologists conducted a systematic search of the literature. In a Delphi process, members of the German Radiological Society (DRG) and members of the Competence Network for Inflammatory Bowel Diseases voted on relevant criteria for the reporting of findings in MRE. Based on the voting results, statements were developed by the expert consensus panel.

RESULTS

Clinically relevant aspects of MRE findings have been defined to optimize reporting and to standardize terminology. Minimal requirements for standardized reporting are suggested. The statements focus on the description of disease activity as well as on complications of IBD. Attributes of intestinal inflammation are described and illustrated by exemplary images.

CONCLUSION

The current manuscript provides standardized parameters and gives practical recommendations on how to report and how to characterize MRE findings in patients with IBD.

KEY POINTS

· Systematic overview provides practice-oriented recommendations and names and evaluates the decisive criteria for reporting and interpretation of MRI in inflammatory bowel disease.. · Standardized terminology and reporting criteria for MRI in IBD improves interdisciplinary communication.. · Standardized collection and documentation of MRI findings in IBD helps to further establish the method and to improve care for IBD patients..

CITATION FORMAT

· Wessling J, Kucharzik T, Bettenworth D et al. Intestinal MRI in Inflammatory Bowel Disease - Literature and Survey-Based Recommendations regarding Reporting by the German Radiological Society (DRG) and the German Competence Network for Inflammatory Bowel Diseases. Fortschr Röntgenstr 2023; 195: 675 - 690.

Intestinal strictures in Crohn's disease: a 2021 update

Intestinal strictures remain one of the most intractable and common complications of Crohn's disease (CD). Approximately 70% of CD patients will develop fibrotic strictures after 10 years of CD diagnosis. Since specific antifibrotic therapies are unavailable, endoscopic balloon dilation and surgery remain the mainstay treatments despite a high recurrence rate. Besides, there are no reliable methods for accurately evaluating intestinal fibrosis. This is largely due to the fact that the mechanisms of initiation and propagation of intestinal fibrosis are poorly understood. There is growing evidence implying that the pathogenesis of stricturing CD involves the intricate interplay of factors including aberrant immune and nonimmune responses, host-microbiome dysbiosis, and genetic susceptibility. Currently, the progress on intestinal strictures has been fueled by the advent of novel techniques, such as single-cell sequencing, multi-omics, and artificial intelligence. Here, we perform a timely and comprehensive review of the substantial advances in intestinal strictures in 2021, aiming to provide prompt information regarding fibrosis and set the stage for the improvement of diagnosis, treatment, and prognosis of intestinal strictures.

[Position paper on reporting of intestinal ultrasound findings in patients with inflammatory bowel disease]

BACKGROUND

Intestinal ultrasound is increasingly used for primary diagnosis, detection of complications and monitoring of patients with Crohn's disease and ulcerative colitis. Standardization of reporting is relevant to ensure quality of the methodology and to improve communication between different specialties. The current manuscript describes the features required for optimized reporting of intestinal ultrasound findings in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD).

METHODS

An expert consensus panel of gastroenterologists, radiologists, pathologists, paediatric gastroenterologists and surgeons conducted a systematic literature search. In a Delphi- process members of the Kompetenznetz Darmerkrankungen in collaboration with members of the German Society for Radiology (DRG) voted on relevant criteria for reporting of findings in intestinal ultrasound. Based on the voting results statements were agreed by expert consensus.

RESULTS

Clinically relevant aspects of intestinal ultrasound (IUS) findings have been defined to optimize reporting and to standardize terminology. Minimal requirements for standardized reporting are suggested. The statements focus on description of disease activity as well as on complications of IBD. Attributes of intestinal inflammation are described and illustrated by exemplary images.

CONCLUSION

The current manuscript provides practical recommendations on how to standardize documentation and reporting from intestinal ultrasound findings in patients with IBD.

ECCO-ESGAR Topical Review on Optimizing Reporting for Cross-Sectional Imaging in Inflammatory Bowel Disease

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

The diagnosis and follow up of patients with inflammatory bowel disease [IBD] requires cross-sectional imaging modalities, such as intestinal ultrasound [IUS], magnetic resonance imaging [MRI] and computed tomography [CT]. The quality and homogeneity of medical reporting are crucial to ensure effective communication between specialists and to improve patient care. The current topical review addresses optimized reporting requirements for cross-sectional imaging in IBD.

METHODS

An expert consensus panel consisting of gastroenterologists, radiologists and surgeons convened by the ECCO in collaboration with ESGAR performed a systematic literature review covering the reporting aspects of MRI, CT, IUS, endoanal ultrasonography and transperineal ultrasonography in IBD. Practice position statements were developed utilizing a Delphi methodology incorporating two consecutive rounds. Current practice positions were set when ≥80% of the participants agreed on a recommendation.

RESULTS

Twenty-five practice positions were developed, establishing standard terminology for optimal reporting in cross-sectional imaging. Assessment of inflammation, complications and imaging of perianal CD are outlined. The minimum requirements of a standardized report, including a list of essential reporting items, have been defined.

CONCLUSIONS

This topical review offers practice recommendations to optimize and homogenize reporting in cross-sectional imaging in IBD.