Long-term Outcomes in Steroid-refractory Ulcerative Colitis Treated with Tacrolimus Alone or in Combination with Purine Analogues

Efficacy of Switching to Adalimumab for Maintenance of Remission Following Induction Therapy with Tacrolimus in Patients with Ulcerative Colitis

BACKGROUND

Tacrolimus (TAC) effectively induces remission in refractory ulcerative colitis (UC). However, TAC therapy usually lasts for 3 months. Although azathioprine (AZA) is often used in maintenance therapy, the relapse rate remains high. Herein, we evaluated the efficacy of adalimumab (ADA) for remission maintenance in patients with UC after induction therapy with TAC.

METHODS

We prospectively enrolled patients with moderate-to-severe UC who achieved clinical remission after 3 months of TAC therapy with endoscopic non-mucosal healing (Cohort A). After TAC discontinuation, the remission maintenance rate up to 1 year after starting ADA therapy was examined. We retrospectively enrolled patients with UC treated with TAC (Cohort B). Among patients in clinical remission after TAC treatment for 3 months, those who received AZA as remission maintenance therapy after TAC discontinuation constituted the AZA group. Patients in Cohort A who received ADA and AZA as remission maintenance therapy after TAC discontinuation constituted the ADA + AZA group. We compared the remission maintenance rates in the AZA and ADA + AZA groups for up to 5 years after TAC discontinuation.

RESULTS

In Cohort A, of the 46 patients with UC treated with TAC, 17 were eligible for analysis after receiving ADA as remission maintenance therapy. A notable 88.2% (15/17) were still in remission 1 year after starting ADA. The ADA + AZA group (n = 16) exhibited a significantly higher relapse-free rate than the AZA group (n = 26) (p < 0.05; log-rank test).

CONCLUSION

switching to ADA for remission maintenance in patients with refractory UC who achieved clinical remission with TAC is clinically useful.

Prioritization in inflammatory bowel disease therapy

INTRODUCTION

Most guidelines for IBD still recommend step-by-step therapy with initially classic drugs such aminosalicylates (in ulcerative colitis) or steroids but avoid prioritizing certain biological drugs and JAK inhibitors in the complicated course. This review provides an aid to pending therapy decisions.

AREAS COVERED

In this review, we analyze the evidence for Crohn's disease as well as ulcerative colitis in order to optimize and 'personalize' the choice of therapy, especially in difficult cases. The relevant publications in Pubmed were identified in a continuous literature review with the key words 'Crohn´s disease' and 'ulcerative colitis.'

EXPERT OPINION

Based on this complex data set following standard therapies steroid-refractory Crohn´s disease should preferentially be treated with combined infliximab plus azathioprine or risankizumab, in second line after their failure with ustekinumab or 7adalimumab. In steroid-refractory ulcerative colitis infliximab plus azathioprine or upadacitinib should be preferred in first line, filgotinib, tofacitinib or ustekinumab in second line. A steroid-dependent course in both diseases requires azathioprine or vedolizumab, in second line infliximab or Janus kinase inhibitors. The conclusions drawn from these complex data may be helpful for individual decision making in daily clinical practice.

Different monoclonal antibodies and immunosuppressants administration in patients with neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder: a Bayesian network meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

A variety of novel monoclonal antibodies and immunosuppressant have been proved effective in treating Neuromyelitis Optica Spectrum Disorder (NMOSD). This network meta-analysis compared and ranked the efficacy and tolerability of currently used monoclonal antibodies and immunosuppressive agents in NMOSD.

METHODS

Electronic database including PubMed, Embase and Cochrane Library were searched for relevant studies evaluating monoclonal antibodies and immunosuppressants in patients with NMOSD. The primary outcome measures were annualized relapse rate (ARR), relapse rate, the Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) score, and total adverse events (AEs).

RESULTS

We identified 25 studies with 2919 patients in our meta-analysis. For the primary outcome, rituximab (RTX) (SUCRA: 0.02) ranked first in reduction ARR with a significant difference compared with azathioprine (AZA) (MD - 0.34, 95% CrI - 0.55 to - 0.12) and mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) (MD -0.38, 95% CrI - 0.63 to - 0.14). Tocilizumab (SUCRA: 0.05) ranked first in relapse rate, which was superior to satralizumab (lnOR - 25.4, 95% CrI - 74.4 to - 2.49) and inebilizumab (lnOR - 24.86, 95% CrI - 73.75 to - 1.93). MMF (SUCRA: 0.27) had the fewest AEs followed by RTX (SUCRA: 0.35), both of which showed a significant difference compared with AZA and corticosteroids (MMF vs AZA: lnOR - 1.58, 95% CrI - 2.48 to - 0.68; MMF vs corticosteroids: lnOR - 1.34, 95% CrI - 2.3 to - 0.37) (RTX vs AZA: lnOR - 1.34, 95% CrI - 0.37 to - 2.3; RTX vs corticosteroids: lnOR - 2.52, 95% CrI - 0.32 to - 4.86). In EDSS score, no statistical difference was found between different interventions.

CONCLUSION

RTX and tocilizumab showed better efficacy than traditional immunosuppressants in reducing relapse. For safety, MMF and RTX had fewer AEs. However, studies with larger sample size on newly developed monoclonal antibodies are warranted in the future.

Thiopurine naivety at tacrolimus induction is a predictor of long-term remission in patients with intractable ulcerative colitis who responded to tacrolimus

BACKGROUND

The short-term efficacy of tacrolimus (Tac) for steroid-dependent and steroid-resistant refractory ulcerative colitis (UC) has been demonstrated; however, its long-term outcomes have not been well documented. Thus, this study aimed to clarify the long-term outcomes of patients who achieved Tac-induced remission and identify its predictors.

METHODS

This study included patients with moderate-to-severe active UC who started receiving Tac at our hospital between July 2004 and December 2016. Short-term treatment response was assessed using the Lichtiger index 3 months after starting Tac, and responding patients were further followed up to assess long-term outcomes. The primary endpoint was the relapse-free survival after Tac-induced remission, and the secondary endpoint was the identification of factors associated with relapse after Tac-induced remission.

RESULTS

The cumulative relapse-free survival rate at 10 years after Tac-induced remission was 33.2%. Multivariate analysis revealed that being thiopurine naïve at Tac induction was associated with the absence of relapse (hazard ratio: 0.45; 95% confidence interval: 0.22-0.92).

CONCLUSIONS

Approximately one-third of patients who achieved Tac-induced remission maintained long-term remission. Being thiopurine naïve at Tac induction was a predictor of the absence of relapse.

Low-dose tacrolimus in treating neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder

BACKGROUND

The value of tacrolimus (TAC) in neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder (NMOSD) has not been fully demonstrated. In this study, we aimed to explore the effectiveness and safety of low-dose TAC in treating NMOSD.

METHODS

Patients with NMOSD taking low-dose TAC were retrospectively collected. We compared the annualized relapse rate (ARR) before and after the initiation of TAC. Cox proportional hazards model was used to identify the risk factors of relapse during TAC treatment with their hazard ratio (HR). The effectiveness and safety of TAC were also compared with a group of patients on mycophenolate mofetil (MMF).

RESULTS

A total of 42 NMOSD patients taking TAC were included, with the administered dose of 1-3mg/d. The ARR (1, 0-3) after the initiation of TAC decreased significantly compared to those before TAC treatment (0, 0-2, p < 0.001). The most common adverse events (AEs) observed included alopecia (23.8%), tremor (16.7%) and elevated blood glucose (11.9%). Multivariate Cox proportional hazards model exhibited that patients with higher baseline ARR (HR: 1.77, 0.76-4.16) and Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) score (HR: 1.79, 1.20-2.68) were at a higher risk for relapse during TAC treatment (p = 0.188 and 0.004, respectively). We did not observe significant difference between TAC-treated and MMF-treated patients regarding the risk of relapse (p = 0.323).

CONCLUSION

Low-dose TAC was an effective and tolerable choice in treating NMOSD.

Optimizing the Use of Current Treatments and Emerging Therapeutic Approaches to Achieve Therapeutic Success in Patients with Inflammatory Bowel Disease

The current goal of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) treatment is a symptom-free everyday life accompanied by mucosal healing with minimal use of corticosteroids. Recent therapeutic advances, particularly, the emergence of anti-tumor necrosis factor (anti-TNF) antibodies, have changed the natural history of IBD. Additionally, these advances also led to the emergence of the therapeutic concept of the “treat to target” strategy. With the development of new drugs and clinical trials, not only biologics but also small molecules have been applied to clinical practice to better individualize and optimize therapy. However, if newer drugs, including anti-TNF therapies, are recommended for all patients diagnosed with IBD, a significant number of patients will be overtreated. The basic goal of IBD treatment is still to make the best use of conventional treatments based on IBD pathophysiology. Thus, physicians should be familiar with the modes of action of the available drugs. In this review, the author discusses the existing data for many approved drugs and provide insights for optimizing current treatments for the management of patients with IBD in the era of biologics.

Tacrolimus induces short-term but not long-term clinical response in inflammatory bowel disease

BACKGROUND

Tacrolimus is a calcineurin inhibitor commonly used for prophylaxis of rejection in renal and liver transplantation. There are limited but favourable data regarding its possible use in patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD).

AIMS

To evaluate the efficacy and safety of tacrolimus in patients with IBD in clinical practice.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective, multicentre study in 22 centres in Spain. All adult patients who received oral tacrolimus for luminal or perianal IBD were included. Clinical response was assessed by Harvey-Bradshaw index and partial Mayo score after 3 months. Perianal disease was evaluated by fistula drainage assessment.

RESULTS

One hundred and forty-three patients were included (mean age 38 years; 51% male; median disease duration 110 months). In ulcerative colitis (UC) (n = 58), the partial Mayo score decreased after 3 months from median 6 to 3 (P = 0.0001), whereas in Crohn's disease (CD) (n = 85), the Harvey-Bradshaw index decreased after 3 months from median 9 to 7 (P = 0.011). In CD patients, blood tacrolimus concentrations during induction (>10 ng/mL vs <10 ng/mL; odds ratio 0.23, 95% CI 0.05-0.87) and the concomitant use of thiopurines (odds ratio 0.18, 95% CI 0.04-0.81) were associated with lower clinical disease activity at 3 months. Of 62 patients with perianal disease, complete closure was observed in 8% (n = 5) of patients with perianal fistulas, with 34% (n = 21) showing partial response. Treatment was maintained for a median of 6 months (IQR, 2-16). After a median clinical follow-up of 24 months (IQR, 15-57), the rate of treatment-related adverse events was 34%, correlating with blood drug concentrations (P = 0.021). Finally, 120 patients (84%) discontinued tacrolimus, usually due to absence or loss of response. Three patients (2%) were subsequently diagnosed with cancer. The overall rate of surgery was 39%, with a 33% colectomy rate in UC.

CONCLUSIONS

Tacrolimus shows a clinical benefit in both CD and UC after 3 months of treatment, but its long-term effectiveness and frequent adverse events remain relevant issues in clinical practice.

Tacrolimus is effective for neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorders with or without anti-AQP4 antibody

BACKGROUND

Neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorders (NMOSD) are a group of inflammatory central nervous system disorders characterized by optic neuritis, transverse myelitis, and anti-aquaporin 4 (AQP4) antibody production. However, it has recently been shown that some cases of typical NMOSD can be anti-AQP4 antibody-negative as well. In this study, we retrospectively investigated the disorder relapse-suppressing effect of tacrolimus (TAC) when combined with prednisolone (PSL) in anti-AQP4 antibody-positive and -negative NMOSD cases.

METHODS

Subjects were NMOSD outpatients treated at our hospital in August 2016 who fulfilled the 2015 International Panel for NMO Diagnosis criteria and whose medical history before visiting our department was known; anti-myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein antibody-positive cases were excluded. We retrospectively investigated the annualized relapse rate (ARR) before and after combined TAC and PSL treatment in 50 NMOSD cases who had been using TAC with PSL for at least 1 year and whom we were also able to observe.

RESULTS

There were 42 anti-AQP4 antibody-positive cases and 8 negative cases. Observation periods of the anti-AQP4 antibody-positive cases were 1.1 years before TAC and 5.1 years after TAC. ARR before TAC was 1.0 and 0.08 after TAC, indicating a relapse-suppression rate of 92% (p < 0.001) and clear improvement. In the anti-AQP4 antibody-negative group, the observation period was 5.6 years before and 4.1 years after TAC. ARR before TAC was 0.5 and 0.07 after TAC. The relapse-suppression rate was 86% (p < 0.05), which was obviously as effective as in the anti-AQP4 antibody-positive group. PSL dose in the anti-AQP4 antibody-positive group was 15.0 mg/day at the start of TAC and was reduced to 6.3 mg/day after 2 years (p < 0.001). The Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) score decreased from 4.5 at the start of TAC to 2.0 after 2 years in the anti-AQP4 antibody-positive group (p < 0.05), which was a clear improvement.

CONCLUSION

Combined use of TAC with PSL clearly suppressed relapse of both anti-AQP4 antibody-positive and -negative NMOSD. In the anti-AQP4 antibody-positive group, both PSL dose and EDSS score decreased compared with the dose at the start of the study.

Azathioprine Is Useful for Maintaining Long-term Remission Induced by Tacrolimus for the Treatment of Ulcerative Colitis: An Inverse Probability of a Treatment Weighing Analysis

Objective The need for and efficacy of immunomodulators for maintaining remission after tacrolimus therapy have not been sufficiently defined. This study evaluated the efficacy of immunomodulators for maintaining remission in patients with ulcerative colitis after tacrolimus therapy. Methods Patients with active ulcerative colitis who started oral tacrolimus between January 2009 and September 2017 and were responsive were retrospectively evaluated. Long-term outcomes were compared using Cox proportional hazard regression with inverse probability of treatment weighting. Results Among the 63 patients in the study, 45 received immunomodulators. During the follow-up, 30 patients (47.6%) experienced a relapse. The relapse-free survival rate was significantly worse in the group that did not receive immunomodulators than in those that did (p=0.01, log-rank test); the 2-year relapse-free rates were 22.5% and 63.6% in the non-immunomodulator and immunomodulator groups, respectively. A multivariate analysis showed immunomodulator treatment to be an independent protective factor for clinical relapse (adjusted hazard ratio: 0.35, 95% confidence interval: 0.16-0.78, p=0.01). A Cox regression analysis using inverse probability of treatment weighting also showed that immunomodulator maintenance therapy was correlated with a longer relapse-free survival (hazard ratio: 0.31, 95% confidence interval: 0.15-0.64, p<0.01), A similar response was also observed in non-steroid-dependent patients (hazard ratio: 0.36, 95% confidence interval: 0.14-0.99, p=0.047). No serious adverse events occurred due to tacrolimus or immunomodulator, and immunomodulator use did not increase the incidence of adverse events caused by tacrolimus. Conclusion Our data suggest that the use of immunomodulators to maintain remission after tacrolimus therapy is beneficial for patients with ulcerative colitis.

Performance of tacrolimus in hospitalized patients with steroid-refractory acute severe ulcerative colitis

BACKGROUND

Acute severe ulcerative colitis unresponsive to systemic steroid treatment is a life-threatening medical condition requiring hospitalization and often colectomy. Despite the increasing choice of medical therapy options for ulcerative colitis, the condition remains a great challenge in the field of inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD). The performance of the calcineurin inhibitor tacrolimus in this clinical setting is insufficiently elucidated.

AIM

To evaluate the short and long-term outcomes of tacrolimus therapy in adult inpatients with steroid-refractory acute severe ulcerative colitis.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective monocentric study enrolling 22 patients at a tertiary care center for the treatment of IBD. All patients who were admitted to one of the wards of the Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology of the Heidelberg University Hospital with acute severe ulcerative colitis between 2007 and 2018, and who received oral or intravenous tacrolimus for steroid-refractory disease were included. Baseline characteristics and data on the disease courses were retrieved from entirely computerized patient charts. The primary study endpoint was clinical response to tacrolimus therapy, resulting in discharge from the hospital. Secondary study endpoints were colectomy rate and time to colectomy, achievement of clinical remission under tacrolimus therapy, and the occurrence of side effects.

RESULTS

In the majority of the 22 included patients (68.2%), tacrolimus therapy was initiated intravenously and subsequently converted to oral administration. The treatment duration was 128 ± 28.5 d (mean ± SEM), and the patients were followed up for 705 ± 110 d after treatment initiation. Among all patients, 86.4% were discharged from the hospital under continued oral tacrolimus therapy. In 36.4% of the patients, the administration of tacrolimus resulted in clinical remission at some point during the treatment. Thirty-two percent of the patients underwent colectomy between 5 and 194 d after the initiation of tacrolimus treatment (mean: 97.4 ± 20.8 d). Colectomy-free survival rates at 1, 3, 6 and 12 mo after the initiation of tacrolimus therapy were 90.9%, 86.4%, 77.3% and 68.2%, respectively. The safety profile of tacrolimus was overall favorable. Only two patients discontinued the treatment due to side effects.

CONCLUSION

The short-term outcome of tacrolimus in steroid-refractory acute severe ulcerative colitis was beneficial, and side effects were rare. In all, tacrolimus therapy appears to be a viable option for short-term treatment of steroid-refractory acute severe ulcerative colitis besides ciclosporin and anti-tumor necrosis factor α treatment.

Conventional therapy for moderate to severe inflammatory bowel disease: A systematic literature review

BACKGROUND

Despite the advent of biological drugs, conventional therapy continues to be used in moderate to severe inflammatory bowel disease (MS-IBD). This study hypothesized that as a standard of treatment and the primary alternative to biologics, conventional therapy should present robust effectiveness results in IBD outcomes.

AIM

To investigate the effectiveness of conventional therapy for MS-IBD.

METHODS

A systematic review with no time limit was conducted in July 2017 through the Cochrane Collaboration, MEDLINE, and LILACS databases. The inclusion criteria encompassed meta-analyses, systematic reviews, randomized clinical trials, observational and case-control studies concerning conventional therapy in adult patients with MS-IBD, including Crohn’s disease (CD) and ulcerative colitis (UC). Corticosteroids (prednisone, hydrocortisone, budesonide, prednisolone, dexamethasone), 5-aminosalicylic acid (5-ASA) derivatives (mesalazine and sulfasalazine) and immunosuppressants [azathioprine (AZA), methotrexate (MTX), mycophenolate, cyclosporine, tacrolimus, 6-mercaptopurine (6-MP)] were considered conventional therapy. The exclusion criteria were sample size below 50; narrative reviews; specific subpopulations (e.g., pregnant women, comorbidities); studies on postoperative IBD; and languages other than English, Spanish, French or Portuguese. The primary outcome measures were clinical remission (induction or maintenance), clinical response and mucosal healing. As secondary outcomes, fecal calprotectin, hospitalization, death, and surgeries were analyzed. The quality of the evidence was assessed using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation criteria.

RESULTS

The search strategy identified 1995 citations, of which 27 were considered eligible (7 meta-analyses, 20 individual studies). For induction of clinical remission, four meta-analyses were selected (AZA and 6-MP showed no advantage over placebo, MTX or 5-ASA in CD; MTX showed no statistically significant difference versus placebo, 6-MP, or 5-ASA in UC; tacrolimus was superior to placebo for UC in two meta-analyses). Only one meta-analysis evaluated clinical remission maintenance, showing no statistically significant difference between MTX and placebo, 5-ASA, or 6-MP in UC. AZA and 6-MP had no advantage over placebo in induction of clinical response in CD. Three meta-analyses showed the superiority of tacrolimus vs placebo for induction of clinical response in UC. The clinical response rates for cyclosporine were 41.7% in randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and 55.4% in non-RCTs for UC. For induction of mucosal healing, one meta-analysis showed a favorable rate with tacrolimus versus placebo for UC. For secondary outcomes, no meta-analyses specifically evaluated fecal calprotectin, hospitalization or death. Two meta-analyses were retrieved evaluating colectomy rates for tacrolimus and cyclosporine in UC. Most of the twenty individual studies retrieved contained a low or very low quality of evidence.

CONCLUSION

High-quality evidence assessing conventional therapy in MS-IBD treatment is scarce, especially for remission maintenance, mucosal healing and fecal calprotectin.

Recent advances and emerging therapies in the non-surgical management of ulcerative colitis

The so-called “biologicals” (monoclonal antibodies to various inflammatory targets like tumor necrosis factor or integrins) have revolutionized the treatment of inflammatory bowel diseases. In ulcerative colitis, they have an established role in inducing remission in steroid-refractory disease and, thereafter, maintaining remission with or without azathioprine. Nevertheless, their limitations are also obvious: lack of primary response or loss of response during maintenance as well as various, in part severe, side effects. The latter are less frequent in anti-integrin treatment, but efficacy, especially during induction, is delayed. New antibodies as well as small molecules have also demonstrated clinical efficacy and are soon to be licensed for ulcerative colitis. None of these novel drugs seems to be much more effective overall than the competition, but they provide new options in otherwise refractory patients. This increasing complexity requires new algorithms, but it is still premature to outline each drug’s role in future treatment paradigms.

Comparison of Safety and Efficacy of Tacrolimus versus Infliximab for Active Ulcerative Colitis

BACKGROUND

This narrative review was to determine which medication, tacrolimus (TAC) or infliximab (IFX), is safer and more effective in the management of active UC. Our literature search identified 5 studies directly comparing the outcomes of TAC versus IFX for active UC. A review of the 5 studies was undertaken.

SUMMARY

The incidence of serious adverse events was not significantly different between the TAC and IFX groups. The short-term clinical remission and response rates and the colectomy-free rates were similar between the groups. TAC was usually withdrawn at week 12 and, therefore, the long-term efficacy of TAC could not be properly evaluated. The majority of patients in the IFX group maintained clinical remission in the long-term. The efficacy of IFX as second-line salvage therapy after failure of TAC appeared to be favourable, but the efficacy of TAC after failure of IFX was questionable. Key Messages: Both TAC and IFX appeared to be equally safe and effective in the short-term for patients with active UC. For the moment, treatment choice, TAC or IFX, should be guided by physician and centre experience. Randomised controlled trials are urgently warranted to rigorously compare the efficacy of TAC versus IFX for active UC.

Efficacy and safety of tacrolimus treatment for neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder

Neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder (NMOSD) is a severe inflammatory autoimmune disease that mainly involves the optic nerves and spinal cord, causing blindness and paralysis. Although some immunosuppressants such as rituximab and azathioprine have proven to be effective in relapse prevention, the high costs or intolerable adverse events preclude their wide application. Thus, we have conducted a retrospective study in 25 NMOSD patients who were treated with tacrolimus, an immunosuppressant with high efficacy and good tolerance in other autoimmune diseases, to assess its efficacy and safety in NMOSD treatment during the last five years (2011-2016). The results revealed that tacrolimus could reduce the relapse rate by 86.2% and improve the Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) scores (4.5 vs 2.3; P < 0.001) significantly. Relapses in tacrolimus treatment were associated with serum titers of aquaporin 4 antibody (AQP4-IgG) (P = 0.028). Further Cox proportional analysis demonstrated that patients with high titers of AQP4-IgG (≥1:64) had a significantly higher risk of relapse than those with low titers after tacrolimus therapy (HR:5.665; CI₉₅: 1.012-31.705; P = 0.048). Tacrolimus tended to be superior to azathioprine (29 patients) in terms of efficacy and safety during the same period. Our study suggests that tacrolimus may be another promising immunosuppressant for NMOSD.

Tacrolimus vs. anti-tumour necrosis factor agents for moderately to severely active ulcerative colitis: a retrospective observational study

BACKGROUND

There have been no comparative studies of tacrolimus vs. anti-tumour necrosis factor (anti-TNF) agents to determine which treatment is safer or more effective in refractory ulcerative colitis (UC).

AIM

To compare short-term safety and efficacy of tacrolimus vs. anti-TNF agents for active UC.

METHODS

One hundred patients with moderate-to-severe active UC were studied. Fifty patients were treated with oral tacrolimus (TAC group). The other 50 patients were treated with anti-TNF agents (anti-TNF group): 40 with infliximab and 10 with adalimumab. Primary endpoints were clinical response and remission rates, colectomy rate, and the incidence of adverse events during 12 weeks.

RESULTS

The incidence of adverse events was 12% in the TAC vs. 18% in the anti-TNF groups (P = 0.58). At week 12, clinical remission rate was 40% in the TAC vs. 28% in the anti-TNF groups (P = 0.29). Clinical response (including remission) rate was 62% in the TAC vs. 64% in the anti-TNF groups (P > 0.99). Five patients (10%) in the TAC and 8 (16%) in the anti-TNF groups required colectomy (P = 0.55). In a subgroup analysis restricted to severely active UC, the response rate was 50% in the TAC vs. 25% in the anti-TNF groups (P = 0.24). In severely active UC, the response rate tended to be higher in patients treated with tacrolimus, albeit not statistically significant.

CONCLUSIONS

Both tacrolimus and anti-TNF agents appeared to be safe and effective in the management of moderate-to-severe active UC. However, randomised controlled trials are warranted to confirm the results obtained in this study.