1
|
Miller-Ocuin JL, Ashburn JH. Cancer in the Anal Transition Zone and Ileoanal Pouch following Surgery for Ulcerative Colitis. Clin Colon Rectal Surg 2024; 37:37-40. [PMID: 38188063 PMCID: PMC10769578 DOI: 10.1055/s-0043-1762562] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/09/2024]
Abstract
Restorative proctocolectomy with ileal pouch-anal anastomosis remains the gold standard treatment for patients with ulcerative colitis who desire restoration of intestinal continuity. Despite a significant cancer risk reduction after surgical removal of the colon and rectum, dysplasia and cancers of the ileal pouch or anal transition zone still occur and are a risk even if an anal canal mucosectomy is performed. Surgical care and maintenance after ileoanal anastomosis must include consideration of malignant potential along with other commonly monitored variables such as bowel function and quality of life. Cancers and dysplasia of the ileal pouch are rare but sometimes difficult-to-manage sequelae of pouch surgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jennifer L. Miller-Ocuin
- Division of Colorectal Surgery, Department of Surgery, University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center, Cleveland, Ohio
- Department of Surgery, Atrium Health Wake Forest Baptist, Winston-Salem, North Carolina
| | - Jean H. Ashburn
- Department of Surgery, Atrium Health Wake Forest Baptist, Winston-Salem, North Carolina
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Sriranganathan D, Vinci D, Pellino G, Segal JP. Ileoanal pouch cancers in ulcerative colitis and familial adenomatous polyposis: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Dig Liver Dis 2022; 54:1328-1334. [PMID: 35817683 DOI: 10.1016/j.dld.2022.06.013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/11/2022] [Revised: 04/14/2022] [Accepted: 06/15/2022] [Indexed: 02/08/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Restorative proctocolectomy results in the formation of a pouch that adapts to a more colonic phenotype. The incidence of cancer of the pouch is thought to be low with most societal guidelines differing on their recommendations for surveillance. AIMS We conducted a systematic review with meta-analysis to report the incidence of cancer in all pouch patients. METHODS The Embase, Embase classic and PubMed databases were searched between June 1979- June 2021. A random effects model was performed to find the pooled incidence of pouch cancer. In addition, we also looked for risk factors for pouch cancers. RESULTS Forty-six studies were included. In 19,964 patients with Ulcerative Colitis (UC) the pooled incidence of pouch cancer was 0.0030 (95% CI: 0.0016 -0.0055). In 3741 patients with Familial Adenomatous Polyposis (FAP) the pooled incidence of pouch cancer was 0.01 (95% CI: 0.01 - 0.02). In UC most pouch cancers were found to occur in the pouch body (0.59 (95% CI: 0.29-0.84)). CONCLUSIONS The findings suggest that the pooled incidence of pouch cancer in UC is similar to that which was previously published, and this is the first meta-analysis to report a pooled incidence for pouch cancer in FAP.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Danujan Sriranganathan
- Department of Medicine, Northwick Park Hospital, London North West University Healthcare NHS Trust, Harrow, HA1 3UJ, United Kingdom
| | - Danilo Vinci
- Department of Surgical Science, University Tor Vergata, 00133, Rome, Italy
| | - Gianluca Pellino
- Department of Advanced Medical and Surgical Sciences, Universitá degli Studi della Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli", Naples, Italy; Colorectal Surgery, Vall d'Hebron University Hospital, Barcelona, Spain.
| | - Jonathan P Segal
- Department of Gastroenterology, Northern Hospital, Epping, Melbourne, Australia; Department of Medicine, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Melbourne, Australia.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Le Cosquer G, Buscail E, Gilletta C, Deraison C, Duffas JP, Bournet B, Tuyeras G, Vergnolle N, Buscail L. Incidence and Risk Factors of Cancer in the Anal Transitional Zone and Ileal Pouch following Surgery for Ulcerative Colitis and Familial Adenomatous Polyposis. Cancers (Basel) 2022; 14:cancers14030530. [PMID: 35158797 PMCID: PMC8833833 DOI: 10.3390/cancers14030530] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/28/2021] [Revised: 01/17/2022] [Accepted: 01/18/2022] [Indexed: 12/29/2022] Open
Abstract
Proctocolectomy with ileal pouch-anal anastomosis is the intervention of choice for ulcerative colitis and familial adenomatous polyposis requiring surgery. One of the long-term complications is pouch cancer, having a poor prognosis. The risk of high-grade dysplasia and cancer in the anal transitional zone and ileal pouch after 20 years is estimated to be 2 to 4.5% and 3 to 10% in ulcerative colitis and familial polyposis, respectively. The risk factors for ulcerative colitis are the presence of pre-operative dysplasia or cancer, disease duration > 10 years and severe villous atrophy. For familial polyposis, the risk factors are the number of pre-operative polyps > 1000, surgery with stapled anastomosis and the duration of follow-up. In the case of ulcerative colitis, a pouchoscopy should be performed annually if one of the following is present: dysplasia and cancer at surgery, primary sclerosing cholangitis, villous atrophy and active pouchitis (every 5 years without any of these factors). In the case of familial polyposis, endoscopy is recommended every year including chromoendoscopy. Even if anal transitional zone and ileal pouch cancers seldom occur following proctectomy for ulcerative colitis and familial adenomatous polyposis, the high mortality rate associated with this complication warrants endoscopic monitoring.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Guillaume Le Cosquer
- Department of Gastroenterology and Pancreatology, CHU Toulouse-Rangueil (University Hospital Centre) and Toulouse University, UPS, 31059 Toulouse, France; (G.L.C.); (C.G.); (B.B.)
| | - Etienne Buscail
- Department of Surgery, CHU Toulouse-Rangueil and Toulouse University, UPS, 31059 Toulouse, France; (E.B.); (J.-P.D.); (G.T.)
- IRSD, Toulouse University, INSERM 1022, INRAe, ENVT, UPS, 31300 Toulouse, France; (C.D.); (N.V.)
| | - Cyrielle Gilletta
- Department of Gastroenterology and Pancreatology, CHU Toulouse-Rangueil (University Hospital Centre) and Toulouse University, UPS, 31059 Toulouse, France; (G.L.C.); (C.G.); (B.B.)
| | - Céline Deraison
- IRSD, Toulouse University, INSERM 1022, INRAe, ENVT, UPS, 31300 Toulouse, France; (C.D.); (N.V.)
| | - Jean-Pierre Duffas
- Department of Surgery, CHU Toulouse-Rangueil and Toulouse University, UPS, 31059 Toulouse, France; (E.B.); (J.-P.D.); (G.T.)
| | - Barbara Bournet
- Department of Gastroenterology and Pancreatology, CHU Toulouse-Rangueil (University Hospital Centre) and Toulouse University, UPS, 31059 Toulouse, France; (G.L.C.); (C.G.); (B.B.)
| | - Géraud Tuyeras
- Department of Surgery, CHU Toulouse-Rangueil and Toulouse University, UPS, 31059 Toulouse, France; (E.B.); (J.-P.D.); (G.T.)
| | - Nathalie Vergnolle
- IRSD, Toulouse University, INSERM 1022, INRAe, ENVT, UPS, 31300 Toulouse, France; (C.D.); (N.V.)
| | - Louis Buscail
- Department of Gastroenterology and Pancreatology, CHU Toulouse-Rangueil (University Hospital Centre) and Toulouse University, UPS, 31059 Toulouse, France; (G.L.C.); (C.G.); (B.B.)
- Centre for Clinical Investigation in Biotherapy, CHU Toulouse-Rangueil and INSERM U1436, 31059 Toulouse, France
- Correspondence: ; Tel.: +33-5613-23055
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Primary Signet Ring Cell Carcinoma of the Ileal Pouch. ACG Case Rep J 2022; 9:e00713. [PMID: 35028322 PMCID: PMC8751762 DOI: 10.14309/crj.0000000000000713] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/30/2021] [Accepted: 06/23/2021] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
A 55-year-old man with a history of ulcerative colitis status post ileal pouch-anal anastomosis underwent evaluation for pouchitis. He was found to have signet ring cell cancer within the pouch. Primary cancers of the ileal pouch are rare. Signet ring cell carcinoma is a rare form of adenocarcinoma that can involve the gastrointestinal tract and other organs. We present a case of a signet ring cell carcinoma arising from an ileal pouch.
Collapse
|
5
|
Kayal M, Bhagya Rao B, Bhattacharya A, Ungaro R. Clinical Challenge: From Ulcerative Colitis to Crohn's Disease-Like Pouch Inflammation. Dig Dis Sci 2021; 66:3300-3302. [PMID: 34415452 DOI: 10.1007/s10620-021-07220-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 08/03/2021] [Indexed: 12/09/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Maia Kayal
- Division of Gastroenterology, Icahn School of Medicine At Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA.
| | - Bhavana Bhagya Rao
- Division of Gastroenterology, Icahn School of Medicine At Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA
| | - Abhik Bhattacharya
- Division of Gastroenterology, Icahn School of Medicine At Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA
| | - Ryan Ungaro
- Division of Gastroenterology, Icahn School of Medicine At Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Bhama AR, Kapadia MR. Management of Dysplasia in Ulcerative Colitis. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 2021; 31:855-860. [PMID: 34252316 DOI: 10.1089/lap.2020.0974] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Surveillance colonoscopies for patients with ulcerative colitis (UC) are necessary to monitor for the development of cancer and its precursor, dysplasia. The management of dysplasia in the setting of UC has been evolving over the past two decades. This is in large part due to higher resolution colonoscopes and development of advanced endoscopic techniques, such as chromoendoscopy, endoscopic mucosal resection, and endoscopic submucosal dissection. Mucosal evaluation, as well as identification and removal of dysplastic tissue, has improved markedly, such that the majority of dysplasia is now considered visible. Whereas previously random biopsies were deemed necessary for surveillance, currently their value is uncertain. Surveillance with high-definition colonoscopes is recommended and consideration of chromoendoscopy is suggested. During colonoscopy, if visible dysplasia is identified and removed completely, continued surveillance is appropriate. If dysplasia is unresectable or there are other high-risk factors such as primary sclerosing cholangitis or multifocality, patients should undergo colectomy. If random biopsies are taken and high-grade dysplasia is identified, that is, invisible dysplasia, patients should similarly consider colectomy. Surgical options include total proctocolectomy with end ileostomy versus ileal pouch-anal anastomosis. Patients undergoing pouch surgery must continue surveillance for dysplasia of the rectal cuff and the pouch. Although surgical management remains an important option for dysplasia in the setting of UC, endoscopic surveillance and resection have improved tremendously, leading to a shift in the overall management strategies for these patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anuradha R Bhama
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
| | - Muneera R Kapadia
- Division of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Samaan MA, Irving PM. Authors' Reply to: Type C Mucosa in Pouch Surveillance: Make-do and Mend Rather Than Start From Scratch? J Crohns Colitis 2020; 14:1181. [PMID: 32157305 DOI: 10.1093/ecco-jcc/jjaa045] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/08/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Mark A Samaan
- Department of Gastroenterology, Guy's & St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Peter M Irving
- Department of Gastroenterology, Guy's & St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Affiliation(s)
- Maarten te Groen
- Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, The Netherlands,Corresponding author: Maarten te Groen, MD, Radboud University Medical Center, Geert Grooteplein Zuid 10, 6525GA Nijmegen, The Netherlands. Tel. +31 (0)24 361 1111;
| | - Frank Hoentjen
- Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Lauranne Derikx
- Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Barnes EL, Lightner AL, Regueiro M. Perioperative and Postoperative Management of Patients With Crohn's Disease and Ulcerative Colitis. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2020; 18:1356-1366. [PMID: 31589972 DOI: 10.1016/j.cgh.2019.09.040] [Citation(s) in RCA: 58] [Impact Index Per Article: 14.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/30/2019] [Revised: 09/18/2019] [Accepted: 09/28/2019] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
Although the number of available therapies for the treatment of ulcerative colitis and Crohn's disease (CD) continues to expand, a significant portion of patients with inflammatory bowel disease will require surgical intervention. Surgery remains an integral part of the treatment algorithm for patients with ulcerative colitis and CD, and thus multidisciplinary approaches to the perioperative and postoperative management of patients with inflammatory bowel disease are critical to improving outcomes during these periods. New mechanisms of biologic therapies are emerging and new treatment strategies focused on earlier and potentially more aggressive use of immunosuppressive therapies are advocated in the current treatment era. In this review, we outline multidisciplinary strategies for the preoperative management of immunosuppressive therapies, including a discussion of the most recent evidence regarding the safety of biologic therapy in the preoperative period. We also discuss the postoperative medical management of patients undergoing intestinal resection for CD, with a particular focus on risk stratification and appropriate therapy selection in the immediate postoperative setting. Finally, we review potential postoperative complications after restorative proctocolectomy with ileal pouch-anal anastomosis and their management.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Edward L Barnes
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina; Multidisciplinary Center for Inflammatory Bowel Diseases, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina; Center for Gastrointestinal Biology and Disease, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina.
| | - Amy L Lightner
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio
| | - Miguel Regueiro
- Department of Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition, The Pier C. and Renee A. Borra Family Endowed Chair in Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio; Digestive Disease and Surgery Institute, Lerner College of Medicine, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Ng KS, Gonsalves SJ, Sagar PM. Ileal-anal pouches: A review of its history, indications, and complications. World J Gastroenterol 2019; 25:4320-4342. [PMID: 31496616 PMCID: PMC6710180 DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v25.i31.4320] [Citation(s) in RCA: 72] [Impact Index Per Article: 14.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/12/2019] [Revised: 03/12/2019] [Accepted: 03/25/2019] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
The ileal pouch anal anastomosis (IPAA) has revolutionised the surgical management of ulcerative colitis (UC) and familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP). Despite refinement in surgical technique(s) and patient selection, IPAA can be associated with significant morbidity. As the IPAA celebrated its 40th anniversary in 2018, this review provides a timely outline of its history, indications, and complications. IPAA has undergone significant modification since 1978. For both UC and FAP, IPAA surgery aims to definitively cure disease and prevent malignant degeneration, while providing adequate continence and avoiding a permanent stoma. The majority of patients experience long-term success, but “early” and “late” complications are recognised. Pelvic sepsis is a common early complication with far-reaching consequences of long-term pouch dysfunction, but prompt intervention (either radiological or surgical) reduces the risk of pouch failure. Even in the absence of sepsis, pouch dysfunction is a long-term complication that may have a myriad of causes. Pouchitis is a common cause that remains incompletely understood and difficult to manage at times. 10% of patients succumb to the diagnosis of pouch failure, which is traditionally associated with the need for pouch excision. This review provides a timely outline of the history, indications, and complications associated with IPAA. Patient selection remains key, and contraindications exist for this surgery. A structured management plan is vital to the successful management of complications following pouch surgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kheng-Seong Ng
- John Goligher Colorectal Unit, St. James’s University Hospital, Leeds LS9 7TF, United Kingdom
- Institute of Academic Surgery, University of Sydney, Camperdown, New South Wales 2050, Australia
| | - Simon Joseph Gonsalves
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Huddersfield Royal Infirmary, Calderdale and Huddersfield NHS Foundation Trust, Huddersfield HD3 3EA, United Kingdom
| | - Peter Michael Sagar
- John Goligher Colorectal Unit, St. James’s University Hospital, Leeds LS9 7TF, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Samaan MA, Forsyth K, Segal JP, De Jong D, Vleugels JLA, Elkady S, Kabir M, Campbell S, Kok K, Armstrong DG, Penez L, Arenaza AP, Seward E, Vega R, Mehta S, Rahman F, McCartney S, Bloom S, Patel K, Pollok R, Westcott E, Darakhshan A, Williams A, Koumoutsos I, Ray S, Mawdsley J, Anderson S, Sanderson JD, Dekker E, D'Haens GR, Hart A, Irving PM. Current Practices in Ileal Pouch Surveillance for Patients With Ulcerative Colitis: A Multinational, Retrospective Cohort Study. J Crohns Colitis 2019; 13:735-743. [PMID: 30590513 DOI: 10.1093/ecco-jcc/jjy225] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/08/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIMS There are no universally accepted guidelines regarding surveillance of ulcerative colitis [UC] patients after restorative proctocolectomy and ileal pouch-anal anastomosis [IPAA]. There also exists a lack of validated quality assurance standards for performing pouchoscopy. To better understand IPAA surveillance practices in the face of this clinical equipoise, we carried out a retrospective cohort study at five inflammatory bowel disease [IBD] referral centres. METHODS Records of patients who underwent IPAA for UC or IBD unclassified [IBDU] were reviewed, and patients with <1-year follow-up after restoration of intestinal continuity were excluded. Criteria for determining the risk of pouch dysplasia formation were collected as well as the use of pouchoscopy, biopsies, and completeness of reports. RESULTS We included 272 patients. Median duration of pouch follow-up was 10.5 [3.3-23.6] years; 95/272 [35%] had never undergone pouchoscopy for any indication; 191/272 [70%] had never undergone pouchoscopy with surveillance as the specific indication; and 3/26 [12%] high-risk patients had never undergone pouchoscopy. Two cases of adenocarcinoma were identified, occurring in the rectal cuff of low-risk patients. Patients under the care of surgeons appeared more likely to undergo surveillance, but rates of incomplete reporting were higher among surgeons [78%] than gastroenterologists [54%, p = 0.002]. CONCLUSIONS We observed wide variation in surveillance of UC/IBDU-IPAA patients. In addition, the rate of neoplasia formation among 'low-risk' patients was higher than may have been expected. We therefore concur with previous recommendations that pouchoscopy be performed at 1 year postoperatively, to refine risk-stratification based on clinical factors alone. Reports should document findings in all regions of the pouch and biopsies should be taken.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mark A Samaan
- Department of Gastroenterology, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Katrina Forsyth
- Department of Gastroenterology, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.,Department of Gastroenterology, St George's University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Jonathan P Segal
- Department of Gastroenterology, St Mark's Hospital, London, UK.,Faculty of Medicine, Department of Surgery & Cancer, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - Djuna De Jong
- Department of Gastroenterology, Amsterdam University Medical Center, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Jasper L A Vleugels
- Department of Gastroenterology, Amsterdam University Medical Center, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Soad Elkady
- Department of Gastroenterology, St Mark's Hospital, London, UK.,Faculty of Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Gastroenterology unit, University of Alexandria, Alexandria, Egypt
| | - Misha Kabir
- Department of Gastroenterology, University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Samantha Campbell
- Department of Gastroenterology, University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Klaartje Kok
- Department of Gastroenterology, Barts Health NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - David G Armstrong
- Department of Gastroenterology, St George's University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Lawrence Penez
- Department of Gastroenterology, St Mark's Hospital, London, UK
| | - Aitor P Arenaza
- Department of Gastroenterology, St Mark's Hospital, London, UK
| | - Edward Seward
- Department of Gastroenterology, University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Roser Vega
- Department of Gastroenterology, University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Shameer Mehta
- Department of Gastroenterology, University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Farooq Rahman
- Department of Gastroenterology, University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Sara McCartney
- Department of Gastroenterology, University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Stuart Bloom
- Department of Gastroenterology, University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Kamal Patel
- Department of Gastroenterology, St George's University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Richard Pollok
- Department of Gastroenterology, St George's University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Edward Westcott
- Department of Surgery, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Amir Darakhshan
- Department of Surgery, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Andrew Williams
- Department of Surgery, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Ioannis Koumoutsos
- Department of Gastroenterology, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Shuvra Ray
- Department of Gastroenterology, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Joel Mawdsley
- Department of Gastroenterology, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Simon Anderson
- Department of Gastroenterology, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Jeremy D Sanderson
- Department of Gastroenterology, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Evelien Dekker
- Department of Gastroenterology, Amsterdam University Medical Center, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Geert R D'Haens
- Department of Gastroenterology, Amsterdam University Medical Center, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Ailsa Hart
- Department of Gastroenterology, St Mark's Hospital, London, UK.,Faculty of Medicine, Department of Surgery & Cancer, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - Peter M Irving
- Department of Gastroenterology, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Quinn KP, Lightner AL, Faubion WA, Raffals LE. A Comprehensive Approach to Pouch Disorders. Inflamm Bowel Dis 2019; 25:460-471. [PMID: 30124882 DOI: 10.1093/ibd/izy267] [Citation(s) in RCA: 25] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/19/2018] [Indexed: 12/18/2022]
Abstract
Restorative proctocolectomy with ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (IPAA) is the surgical procedure of choice for patients with medically refractory ulcerative colitis (UC) or indeterminate colitis, UC with colonic dysplasia or neoplasia, and familial adenomatous polyposis. In general, patients experience good function outcomes and quality of life with an IPAA. Although pouchitis is the most well-recognized and frequent complication after IPAA, a number of additional inflammatory, postsurgical, structural, neoplastic, and functional complications may occur, resulting in pouch dysfunction. We herein provide a comprehensive review of pouch function and an approach to diagnosis and management of pouch complications.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kevin P Quinn
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Amy L Lightner
- Division of Colon and Rectal Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - William A Faubion
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Laura E Raffals
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Short article: Recommendations on rectal surveillance for colorectal cancer after subtotal colectomy in patients with inflammatory bowel disease. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2018; 30:843-846. [PMID: 29781837 DOI: 10.1097/meg.0000000000001171] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/23/2022]
Abstract
Approximately 30% of patients with ulcerative colitis require a colectomy during their disease course. This substantially reduces colorectal cancer risk, although it is still possible to develop colorectal neoplasia in the remaining rectum. Although clear and well-accepted surveillance guidelines exist for patients with inflammatory bowel disease with an intact colon, specific surveillance recommendations following colectomy are less clear. Here, we aim to summarize the prevalence, incidence, and risk factors for developing colorectal cancer in patients with inflammatory bowel disease who underwent subtotal colectomy with a permanent end ileostomy and rectal stump, or with ileorectal anastomosis. Subsequently, gained insights are integrated into a proposed endoscopic surveillance strategy of the residual rectum.
Collapse
|
14
|
Mark-Christensen A, Erichsen R, Brandsborg S, Rosenberg J, Qvist N, Thorlacius-Ussing O, Hillingsø J, Pachler JH, Christiansen EG, Laurberg S. Long-term Risk of Cancer Following Ileal Pouch-anal Anastomosis for Ulcerative Colitis. J Crohns Colitis 2018; 12:57-62. [PMID: 28981638 DOI: 10.1093/ecco-jcc/jjx112] [Citation(s) in RCA: 27] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/15/2017] [Accepted: 08/01/2017] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The overall risk of cancer following ileal pouch-anal anastomosis [IPAA] is unknown, and pouch cancer surveillance is controversial. We evaluated long-term risk of cancer in a national cohort of patients with ulcerative colitis and IPAA, with emphasis on pouch cancer. METHODS Data on incident cancers were extracted from the national Danish Cancer Registry. Incidence rates for all site-specific cancers were compared between patients with IPAA and a gender- and age-matched comparison cohort from the background population to obtain incidence rate ratios [IRRs]. RESULTS A total of 1723 patients with IPAA, operated for ulcerative colitis in the period 1980-2010, were matched to 8615 individuals from the background population. During a median follow-up of 12.9 years (interquartile range [IQR] 7.7-19.6 years), two pouch cancers [0.12%] were found after 16 and 27 years, respectively. In the population comparison cohort, 38 intestinal cancers [0.45%] were found, of which 35 were colorectal. The risk of hepatobiliary cancer was higher for patients with IPAA {IRR = 13.0 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 3.1-76.1)}, and half of the affected patients had coexisting primary sclerosing cholangitis. The risk of cancer overall following IPAA was identical to that of the comparison cohort: IRR = 1.05 [0.84-1.31]. CONCLUSIONS Pouch cancer following IPAA is very rare, questioning the need for general, rather than selective, surveillance. The overall cancer risk is comparable to that of the background population, and the increased risk of hepatobiliary cancer is likely an effect of coexisting liver disease and not causally related to IPAA.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Rune Erichsen
- Department of Surgery, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus C, Denmark.,Department of Clinical Epidemiology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus N, Denmark
| | - Søren Brandsborg
- Department of Surgery, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus C, Denmark
| | | | - Niels Qvist
- Department of Surgery A, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark
| | | | - Jens Hillingsø
- Department of Surgery and Transplantation, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | | | | | - Søren Laurberg
- Department of Surgery, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus C, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Pellino G, Kontovounisios C, Tait D, Nicholls J, Tekkis PP. Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Anal Transitional Zone after Ileal Pouch Surgery for Ulcerative Colitis: Systematic Review and Treatment Perspectives. Case Rep Oncol 2017; 10:112-122. [PMID: 28203173 PMCID: PMC5301117 DOI: 10.1159/000455898] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/05/2017] [Accepted: 01/06/2017] [Indexed: 12/29/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Few cases of pouch-related cancers have been reported in ulcerative colitis (UC), and squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) is very rare. METHOD A systematic review of the literature was performed to identify all unequivocal cases of pouch-related SCC in UC patients. RESULTS Eight cases of SCC developing after ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (IPAA) have been observed since 1978. Two arose from the pouch mucosa and 6 from below. The pooled cumulative incidence of SCC is below 0.06% after IPAA. Many patients had neoplasia on the preoperative specimen, but squamous metaplasia of the pouch or anorectal mucosa may have an important role in SCC. These patients are rarely offered chemoradiation therapy and the outcome is poor. Selected patients with SCC located close to the pouch outlet can be treated with chemoradiation prior to consideration of surgery and salvage their pouch. A chemoradiation regimen is suggested to avoid pouch excision in these patients. CONCLUSIONS SCC is rare after pouch surgery but associated with extremely poor survival. Very low SCC can be managed with chemoradiation treatment, preserving the pouch and avoiding surgery, even in older patients. The role of pouch metaplasia, surveillance frequency, and treatment modalities after IPAA need further studying.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gianluca Pellino
- Division of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, London, UK; Department of Colorectal Surgery, The Royal Marsden Hospital, London, UK
| | - Christos Kontovounisios
- Division of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, London, UK; Department of Colorectal Surgery, The Royal Marsden Hospital, London, UK
| | - Diana Tait
- Radiotherapy Department, The Royal Marsden Hospital, London, UK
| | - John Nicholls
- Division of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - Paris P Tekkis
- Division of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, London, UK; Department of Colorectal Surgery, The Royal Marsden Hospital, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|