The 5C Concept and 5S Principles in Inflammatory Bowel Disease Management

Consensus for criteria of running a pediatric inflammatory bowel disease center using a modified Delphi approach

BACKGROUND

Good quality of care for inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) depends on high-standard management and facility in the IBD center. Yet, there are no clear measures or criteria for evaluating pediatric IBD (PIBD) center in China. The aim of this study was to develop a comprehensive set of quality indicators (QIs) for evaluating PIBD center in China.

METHODS

A modified Delphi consensus-based approach was used to identify a set of QIs of structure, process, and outcomes for defining the criteria. The process included an exhaustive search using complementary approaches to identify potential QIs, and two web-based voting rounds to select the QIs defining the criteria for PIBD center.

RESULTS

A total of 101 QIs (35 structures, 48 processes and 18 outcomes) were included in this consensus. Structure QIs focused on the composition of multidisciplinary team, facilities and services that PIBD center should provide. Process QIs highlight core requirements in diagnosing, evaluating, treating PIBD, and disease follow-up. Outcome QIs mainly included criteria evaluating effectiveness of various interventions in PIBD centers.

CONCLUSION

The present Delphi consensus developed a set of main QIs that may be useful for managing a PIBD center. Video Abstract.

Clair Jones A, Younge L, Lamb CA, Arnott I, Barrett K, Bell G, Bhatnagar G, Blackwell J, Bloom S, Bramwell C, Brookes MJ, Burman A, Cairnes V, Crook KP, Dobson E, Epstein J, Faiz O, Feakins RM, Fletcher M, Garrick V, Keetarut K, Hawthorne AB, Lamb CA, Lee M, Meade U, Muhammed R, Murdock A, Pitney‐Hall N, Rochford A, Rowse G, Sagar P, Segal J, Selinger CP, Sleet S, St. Clair Jones A, Taylor SA, Wakeman R, Weaver S, Younge L. Inflammatory bowel disease patient-reported quality assessment should drive service improvement: a national survey of UK IBD units and patients

BACKGROUND

Healthcare service provision in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) is often designed to meet targets set by healthcare providers rather than those of patients. It is unclear whether this meets the needs of patients, as assessed by patients themselves.

AIMS

To assess patients' experience of IBD and the healthcare they received, aiming to identify factors in IBD healthcare provision associated with perceived high-quality care.

METHODS

Using the 2019 IBD standards as a framework, a national benchmarking tool for quality assessment in IBD was developed by IBD UK, comprising a patient survey and service self-assessment.

RESULTS

134 IBD services and 9757 patients responded. Perceived quality of care was lowest in young adults and increased with age, was higher in males and those >2 years since diagnosis. No hospital services met all the national IBD standards for recommended workforce numbers. Key metrics associated with patient-reported high- quality care were: identification as a tertiary centre, patient information availability, shared decision- making, rapid response to contact for advice, access to urgent review, joint medical/surgical clinics, and access to research (all p < 0.001). Higher numbers of IBD nurse specialists in a service was strongly associated with patients receiving regular reviews and having confidence in self-management and reporting high- quality care.

CONCLUSIONS

This extensive patient and healthcare provider survey emphasises the importance of aspects of care less often measured by clinicians, such as communication, shared decision- making and provision of information. It demonstrates that IBD nurse specialists are crucial to meeting the needs of people living with IBD.

Nurse-Provided Medication Guidance for Improving Drug Adherence to Thiopurines in Outpatients With Inflammatory Bowel Disease: A Single-Center Prospective Study

Background and Aims

Drug adherence is critically important for patients on thiopurines. We examined whether nurse-provided medication guidance improves drug adherence to thiopurines and clinical activity in patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD).

Methods

IBD outpatients taking a stable dose of thiopurines for 1 year were enrolled. After a baseline survey including the Morisky Medication Adherence Scale (MMAS)-8, nurses provided medication guidance to each patient using a specialized leaflet. The same survey was conducted 2 and 6 months after the guidance.

Results

Among 110 enrolled patients, 74 met the analysis criteria. In the low adherence group (MMAS-8 <6), the median MMAS-8 score significantly increased from 4 (range 1-5.75) to 5.25 (2-7) at 2 months (P = .0135) to 5.625 (2.5-7.75) at 6 months (P = .0004), but not in overall or the high adherence group (MMAS-8 ≥6). Older age (≥43 years, odds ratio [OR] = 5.63, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.59-19.9, P = .0074) and shorter disease duration (<129 months, OR = 6.78, 95% CI: 1.77-26.0, P = .0052) were independently associated with high adherence. Although clinical activity scores did not change during the observation period, the overall mean corpuscular volume (MCV) level significantly increased from 92.3 fL (61.4-105.5) to 92.5 (73.7-107.8) at 2 months (P = .0288) and 93.9 (74.4-107.6) at 6 months (P = .0062). MCV levels significantly increased in the low adherence group at 6 months (92.2 [72.2-105.5] to 94.0 [74.4-107.6], P = .0392) and tended to increase in the high adherence group (92.3 [61.4-101.2] to 93.6 [74.9-99.7], P = .0651).

Conclusions

Nurse-provided medication guidance improved drug adherence to thiopurines in IBD patients with low adherence and can also benefit those with high adherence.

Crohn's and Colitis Canada's 2021 Impact of COVID-19 and Inflammatory Bowel Disease in Canada: Health Care Delivery During the Pandemic and the Future Model of Inflammatory Bowel Disease Care

The SARS-CoV-2 pandemic has had a profound impact on inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) health care delivery. The implementation of necessary public health restrictions has restricted access to medications, procedures and surgeries throughout the pandemic, catalyzing widespread change in how IBD care is delivered. Rapid large-scale implementation of virtual care modalities has been shown to be feasible and acceptable for the majority of individuals with IBD and health care providers. The SARS-CoV-2 pandemic has exacerbated pre-existing barriers to accessing high-quality, multidisciplinary IBD care that addresses health care needs holistically. Continued implementation and evaluation of both synchronous and asynchronous eHealthcare modalities are required now and in the future in order to determine how best to incorporate these modalities into patient-centred, collaborative care models. Resources must be dedicated to studies that evaluate the feasibility, acceptability and effectiveness of eHealth-enhanced models of IBD care to improve efficiency and cost-effectiveness, while increasing quality of life for persons living with IBD. Crohn's and Colitis Canada will continue to play a major leadership role in advocating for the health care delivery models that improve the quality of life for persons living with IBD.

Predictive value of blood concentration of biologics on endoscopic inactivity in inflammatory bowel disease: A systematic review

BACKGROUND

Although blood concentration of biologics is an important composition of disease management in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) patients, complexity and uncertainty of biological management encourage many disputes in predicting the outcome of IBD patients through blood concentration of biologics.

AIM

To verify the predictive value of blood concentration of biologics on endoscopic inactivity in IBD patients under different situations.

METHODS

We searched PubMed/MEDLINE, Embase, and Web of Science up to May 2020 and identified IBD patients as the research cohort as well as the correlations between blood concentration of biologics and endoscopic inactivity in IBD patients as the research direction.

RESULTS

A total of 23 articles with 30 clinical studies and 1939 IBD patients were included. The predictive cut-off value of blood concentration of infliximab on mucosal healing should be 2.7-10.6 μg/mL in IBD. Blood concentration of infliximab reaching 5.0-12.7 μg/mL or more increased the probability of fistula healing/closure in perianal fistulizing Crohn's disease. Blood concentration of adalimumab reaching 7.2-16.2 μg/mL or more could predict mucosal healing in IBD. The predictive cut-off value of blood concentration of adalimumab on fistula healing/closure should be 5.9-9.8 μg/mL in perianal fistulizing Crohn's disease. Blood concentration of vedolizumab surpassing 25.0 μg/mL indicated mucosal healing in ulcerative colitis patients under maintenance therapy and the predictive cut-off value of blood concentration on mucosal healing or endoscopic remission under induction therapy in IBD could be 8.0-28.9 μg/mL.

CONCLUSION

Blood concentration of biologics should not be utilized to predict endoscopic inactivity of IBD independently due to discrepancies in clinical studies, whereas conducting therapeutic drug monitoring intensively contributes to precise therapy.

The Future of Biosimilars: Maximizing Benefits Across Immune-Mediated Inflammatory Diseases

Biologics have transformed the treatment of immune-mediated inflammatory diseases such as rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). Biosimilars-biologic medicines with no clinically meaningful differences in safety or efficacy from licensed originators-can stimulate market competition and have the potential to expand patient access to biologics within the parameters of treatment recommendations. However, maximizing the benefits of biosimilars requires cooperation between multiple stakeholders. Regulators and developers should collaborate to ensure biosimilars reach patients rapidly without compromising stringent quality, safety, or efficacy standards. Pharmacoeconomic evaluations and payer policies should be updated following biosimilar market entry, minimizing the risk of imposing nonmedical barriers to biologic treatment. In RA, disparities between treatment guidelines and national reimbursement criteria could be addressed to ensure more uniform patient access to biologics and enable rheumatologists to effectively implement treat-to-target strategies. In IBD, the cost-effectiveness of biologic treatment earlier in the disease course is likely to improve when biosimilars are incorporated into pharmacoeconomic analyses. Patient understanding of biosimilars is crucial for treatment success and avoiding nocebo effects. Full understanding of biosimilars by physicians and carefully considered communication strategies can help support patients initiating or switching to biosimilars. Developers must operate efficiently to be sustainable, without undermining product quality, the reliability of the supply chain, or pharmacovigilance. Developers should also facilitate information sharing to meet the needs of other stakeholders. Such collaboration will help to ensure a sustainable future for both the biosimilar market and healthcare systems, supporting the availability of effective treatments for patients.

British Society of Gastroenterology consensus guidelines on the management of inflammatory bowel disease in adults

Ulcerative colitis and Crohn's disease are the principal forms of inflammatory bowel disease. Both represent chronic inflammation of the gastrointestinal tract, which displays heterogeneity in inflammatory and symptomatic burden between patients and within individuals over time. Optimal management relies on understanding and tailoring evidence-based interventions by clinicians in partnership with patients. This guideline for management of inflammatory bowel disease in adults over 16 years of age was developed by Stakeholders representing UK physicians (British Society of Gastroenterology), surgeons (Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland), specialist nurses (Royal College of Nursing), paediatricians (British Society of Paediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition), dietitians (British Dietetic Association), radiologists (British Society of Gastrointestinal and Abdominal Radiology), general practitioners (Primary Care Society for Gastroenterology) and patients (Crohn's and Colitis UK). A systematic review of 88 247 publications and a Delphi consensus process involving 81 multidisciplinary clinicians and patients was undertaken to develop 168 evidence- and expert opinion-based recommendations for pharmacological, non-pharmacological and surgical interventions, as well as optimal service delivery in the management of both ulcerative colitis and Crohn's disease. Comprehensive up-to-date guidance is provided regarding indications for, initiation and monitoring of immunosuppressive therapies, nutrition interventions, pre-, peri- and postoperative management, as well as structure and function of the multidisciplinary team and integration between primary and secondary care. Twenty research priorities to inform future clinical management are presented, alongside objective measurement of priority importance, determined by 2379 electronic survey responses from individuals living with ulcerative colitis and Crohn's disease, including patients, their families and friends.

British Society of Gastroenterology consensus guidelines on the management of inflammatory bowel disease in adults

Ulcerative colitis and Crohn's disease are the principal forms of inflammatory bowel disease. Both represent chronic inflammation of the gastrointestinal tract, which displays heterogeneity in inflammatory and symptomatic burden between patients and within individuals over time. Optimal management relies on understanding and tailoring evidence-based interventions by clinicians in partnership with patients. This guideline for management of inflammatory bowel disease in adults over 16 years of age was developed by Stakeholders representing UK physicians (British Society of Gastroenterology), surgeons (Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland), specialist nurses (Royal College of Nursing), paediatricians (British Society of Paediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition), dietitians (British Dietetic Association), radiologists (British Society of Gastrointestinal and Abdominal Radiology), general practitioners (Primary Care Society for Gastroenterology) and patients (Crohn's and Colitis UK). A systematic review of 88 247 publications and a Delphi consensus process involving 81 multidisciplinary clinicians and patients was undertaken to develop 168 evidence- and expert opinion-based recommendations for pharmacological, non-pharmacological and surgical interventions, as well as optimal service delivery in the management of both ulcerative colitis and Crohn's disease. Comprehensive up-to-date guidance is provided regarding indications for, initiation and monitoring of immunosuppressive therapies, nutrition interventions, pre-, peri- and postoperative management, as well as structure and function of the multidisciplinary team and integration between primary and secondary care. Twenty research priorities to inform future clinical management are presented, alongside objective measurement of priority importance, determined by 2379 electronic survey responses from individuals living with ulcerative colitis and Crohn's disease, including patients, their families and friends.

Questionnaire Survey from the 1st Kurume University Inflammatory Bowel Disease Center Educational Lecture

INTRODUCTION

The number of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) patients is increasing steadily in Japan, and it is expected that patient groups and patient education will improve the quality of life of patients and IBD care. The 1st Kurume University IBD Center educational lecture was held and a questionnaire survey was administered at this lecture.

METHODS

We asked 78 participants to answer a questionnaire survey on the occasion of the 1st Kurume University IBD Center educational lecture.

RESULTS

We obtained responses from 56 (71.8%) participants; 31 (55.4%) had IBD [21 (37.4%) had ulcerative colitis (UC) and 10 (17.9%) had Crohn's disease (CD)]. Most participants were female (37, 66%). The age range with the highest number of participants was 40 to 69 (27, 48.2%). Most had heard about this educational lecture through "notification by the patient's doctor" 23 (41.1%). A total of 30 (53.6%) of participants answered "good" about the lecture content, while 50 (89.7%) of participants answered "very good" and "good" about the impression of this lecture. Meanwhile, 10 (32.3%) of patients were interested in patient groups. The percentage of patients who were interested in patient groups was higher in patients with CD 4 (66.7%) than those with UC 2 (33.3%).

CONCLUSION

We held the 1st Kurume University IBD center educational lecture. Further studies are needed to assess whether educational lectures and/or patient groups can improve patients' quality of life (QOL) and IBD care in our hospital.

Quality of Care in Patients With Inflammatory Bowel Disease

The rising burden of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) has the potential to have a negative impact on the quality of care delivered to patients with IBD. Quality of care has been described by the World Health Organization as "the extent to which health care services provided to individuals and patient populations improve desired health outcomes." Variation in care has been identified as a key barrier to achieving quality of care in IBD. Assessment of quality of care attempts to minimize variation in care. Quality indicators have been developed in IBD as a minimum standard of care according to evidence-based guidelines. Models of care to achieve and maintain quality include integrated care, participatory care, and value-based health care. In this review, we outline current approaches to the assessment of quality of care in IBD and explore models of care currently being used to achieve and maintain quality.

Improving the quality of care for inflammatory bowel disease

Great strides have been achieved in the development of quality-of-care measures and standards for inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) over the last decade. The central structural component of care in IBD revolves around the multidisciplinary team, which should be equipped with the necessary resources to operate and implement decisions. Process measures have been defined by interest groups and can be adapted into process tools for the delivery of care for various patient subgroups and clinical scenarios. The emerging treat-to-target approach to IBD management may be used to achieve optimal long-term and holistic patient-centred outcomes, such as survival, control of inflammation and disease progression, symptomatic remission, quality of life and complications. Other important quality-of-care outcome measures for IBD include disutility of care, healthcare utilization and other patient-reported outcomes such as nutritional status and impact of fistulae. The current challenge for healthcare providers and health systems is the integration of quality-of-care structures and processes into clinical practice, and the consistent delivery of updated evidence-based quality IBD care to various patient populations by individual health care providers. Finally, the awareness and appreciation for quality of care in IBD is increasing in Asia, and Asian healthcare institutions should be encouraged to take the lead in improving the quality of care in IBD.