Burden of Ulcerative Colitis on Functioning and Well-being: A Systematic Literature Review of the SF-36® Health Survey

Cost-Effectiveness of Vedolizumab as a First-Line Advanced Therapy Versus Adalimumab Treatment Sequences for Ulcerative Colitis in Italy

BACKGROUND

Today, there are many treatment options available for the management of ulcerative colitis, creating challenges in selecting the most efficacious and cost-effective treatment sequences. Treatments in the anti-tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNFα) therapeutic class, as well as vedolizumab, are widely used and endorsed as first-line options according to treatment guidelines. The aim of this study was to compare treatment sequences involving vedolizumab and the anti-TNFα treatment adalimumab in terms of cost-effectiveness in the treatment of moderately to severely active ulcerative colitis in Italy.

METHODS

A cost-effectiveness model comparing treatment sequences within the Italian National Health Service in terms of costs and quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) with a lifetime horizon was developed. The analysis focused on the relative positioning of vedolizumab and adalimumab, leveraging the results of the landmark head-to-head VARSITY clinical trial as key inputs. The robustness of the results was investigated through a range of sensitivity and scenario analyses.

RESULTS

The strategy of vedolizumab as a first-line advanced therapy followed by adalimumab was associated with higher costs and health benefits compared with first-line adalimumab followed by vedolizumab. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio was €16,146/QALY, which was found to be robust to changes to inputs associated with areas of high uncertainty.

CONCLUSION

This economic evaluation estimated a 94% probability that vedolizumab as a first-line advanced therapy is cost-effective at a threshold of €33,004/QALY when compared with first-line adalimumab sequences. Using clinical trial evidence to inform the efficacy of second-line treatments estimated that the effectiveness of anti-TNFα treatments is not substantially reduced by vedolizumab exposure.

Short-term effect of gluten-free diet on disease severity, quality of life, and inflammatory markers among patients with mild to moderate ulcerative colitis: A triple-blind randomized placebo-controlled trial

BACKGROUND AND STUDY AIMS

Diet is an important underlying factor in ulcerative colitis (UC) disease. The present study aimed to investigate the effect of a gluten-free diet (GFD) on disease severity, quality of life, and inflammatory markers in patients with UC.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

In this triple-blind randomized placebo-controlled clinical trial, we evaluated the effect of a GFD on the erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR), C-reactive protein (CRP), fecal calprotectin, disease severity, and quality of life in patients with mild to moderate UC. Patients' quality of life and severity of symptoms were evaluated using the Inflammatory Bowel Disease Questionnaire (IBDQ) and Simple Clinical Colitis Activity Index (SCCAI), respectively. Patients received this regimen for six weeks and were evaluated before and after the intervention.

RESULTS

The mean age of patients (n = 26) was 39.31 years (standard deviation = 9.34). In both study groups, the mean ESR, CRP, IBDQ, and SCCAI showed no statistically significant improvement with the dietary intervention. Fecal calprotectin was increased in both groups without statistical significance.

CONCLUSIONS

We could not find any significant effect of GFD on inflammatory markers, quality of life, and disease severity among patients with mild to moderate UC. It is too early to suggest the gluten-free diet as a safe and beneficial regimen for UC patients. There is a need for further investigations with larger sample sizes and longer follow-ups as clinical trials and cohort studies to obtain more reliable results.

Real-World Patterns and Economic Burden Associated With Treatment Failure With Advanced Therapies in Patients With Moderate-to-Severe Ulcerative Colitis

Background

Some patients lose response during treatment for moderate-to-severe ulcerative colitis (UC). We aimed to characterize real-world treatment failure patterns and associated economic burdens during use of first-line advanced therapies for UC.

Methods

IBM MarketScan Commercial and Medicare Supplemental Databases were used to identify adults initiating ≥ 1 advanced therapy for UC (January 1, 2010-September 30, 2019). Treatment failure was defined as augmentation with non-advanced therapy, discontinuation, dose escalation/interval shortening, failure to taper corticosteroids, UC-related surgery, or UC-related urgent care ≤ 12 months after treatment initiation. The index date was the date of treatment failure (treatment failure cohort) or 12 months after treatment initiation (persistent cohort). Treatment failure rates were assessed using Kaplan-Meier analyses. All-cause and UC-related healthcare resource utilization (HCRU) and costs 12 months post-index were also assessed.

Results

Analysis of treatment failure patterns included data from 6745 patients; HCRU and cost analyses included data from 5302 patients (treatment failure cohort, n = 4295; persistent cohort, n = 1007). In the overall population, 75% experienced treatment failure within the first 12 months (median: 5.1 months). Augmentation with non-advanced therapy (39%) was the most common first treatment failure event. The treatment failure cohort had significantly (P < .001) higher mean costs than the persistent cohort (all-cause, $74 995 vs $56 169; UC-related, $57 096 vs $47 347) mainly attributed to inpatient admissions and outpatient visits. Dose escalation/interval shortening accounted for the highest total costs ($101 668) across treatment failure events.

Conclusions

Advanced therapies for moderate-to-severe UC are associated with high rates of treatment failure and significant economic burden. More efficacious and durable treatments are needed.

Impact of mental health comorbidity in children and young adults with inflammatory bowel disease: a UK population-based cohort study

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the impact of mental health comorbidity in children and young adults with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD).

DESIGN

Retrospective observational study.

SETTING

Representative population, routinely collected primary care data from the UK Optimum Patient Care Research Database (2015-2019).

PARTICIPANTS

Patients with IBD aged 5-25 years with mental health conditions were compared with patients with IBD of the same age without mental health conditions.

PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES

Outcomes comprised quality-of-life indicators (low mood, self-harm, parasuicide, bowel symptoms, absence from school or work, unemployment, substance use and sleep disturbance), IBD interventions (medication, abdominal surgery, stoma formation and nutritional supplements) and healthcare utilisation (primary care interactions and hospital admissions).

RESULTS

Of 1943 individuals aged 5-25 years with IBD, 295 (15%) had a mental health comorbidity. Mental health comorbidity was associated with increased bowel symptoms (adjusted incident rate ratio (aIRR) 1.82; 95% CI 1.33 to 2.52), sleep disturbance (adjusted HR (aHR) 1.63; 95% CI 1.02 to 2.62), substance use (aHR 3.63; 95% CI 1.69 to 7.78), primary care interactions (aIRR 1.33; 95% CI 1.12 to 1.58) and hospital admissions (aIRR 1.87; 95%CI 1.29 to 2.75). In individuals ≥18 years old, mental health comorbidity was associated with increased time off work (aHR 1.55; 95% CI 1.21 to 1.99).

CONCLUSIONS

Mental health comorbidity in children and young adults with IBD is associated with poorer quality of life, higher healthcare utilisation and more time off work. It is imperative that affected young patients with IBD are monitored and receive early mental health support as part of their multidisciplinary care.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

The study protocol was specified and registered a priori (ClinicalTrials.gov study identifier: NCT05206734).

Histologic assessments in ulcerative colitis: the evidence behind a new endpoint in clinical trials

INTRODUCTION

Treatment goals for ulcerative colitis (UC) are evolving from the achievement of clinical remission to more rigorous goals defined by endoscopic and histologic healing. Achievement of deeper remission targets aims to reduce the risk of colectomy, hospitalizations, and colorectal cancer.

AREAS COVERED

This review covers histologic assessments, histologic remission as a clinical trial endpoint, and the association between histologic disease activity and clinical outcomes. Future directions are also discussed, including the use of advanced imaging and artificial intelligence technologies, as well as potential future treatment targets beyond histologic remission.

EXPERT OPINION

Histologic assessments are used for their sensitivity in measuring mucosal inflammatory changes in UC. Due to correlation with disease activity, histologic assessments may support clinical decision-making regarding treatment decisions as such assessments can be associated with rates of clinical relapse, hospitalization, colectomy, and neoplasia. While histologic remission is limited by varying definitions and multiple histologic indices, work is ongoing to create a consensus on the use of histologic assessments in clinical trials. As research advances, aspirational targets beyond histologic remission, such as molecular healing and disease clearance, are being explored.

Derivatives of benzamide of the extracts from the bark of Maqian (Zanthoxylum myriacanthum var. pubescens)

Two newly discovered natural derivatives of benzamide, O-Ethyltembamide (1) and N-[(Z)-2-(4-Methoxyphenyl)vinyl]benzamide(2), together with four known compounds, hortiamide (3), N-[(E)-2-(4-Methoxyphenyl)vinyl] benzamide (alatamide) (4), dihydroaltamide (5) and tembamid (6), were isolated from the barks of of Zanthoxylum myriacanthum var. pubescens (Huang) Huang. Their structures were determined on the basis of spectral data. The anti-inflammatory activity of the isolated compounds (1-6) were scanned against NO production in LPS-activated RAW 264.7 macrophages by MTS assay, however no significant activities were observed.

Mirikizumab Improves Quality of Life in Patients With Moderately-to-Severely Active Ulcerative Colitis: Results From the Phase 3 LUCENT-1 Induction and LUCENT-2 Maintenance Studies

Background

Mirikizumab, an anti-IL-23p19 antibody, demonstrated efficacy in phase 3, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled LUCENT-1 (induction/NCT03518086) and LUCENT-2 (maintenance/NCT03524092) ulcerative colitis (UC) studies. We evaluated the effect of mirikizumab on quality-of-life (QoL) outcomes in these studies.

Methods

In LUCENT-1, 1162 patients with moderately-to-severely active UC were randomized 3:1 to receive mirikizumab 300 mg intravenous or placebo every 4 weeks (Q4W) for 12 weeks. In LUCENT-2, mirikizumab induction responders (N = 544) were re-randomized 2:1 to receive mirikizumab 200 mg subcutaneous or placebo Q4W through week (W) 40 (W52 of treatment). QoL was assessed at W12 and W52 using patient-reported outcomes. Treatments were statistically compared using analysis of covariance model (continuous outcomes) and Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel test (binary outcomes).

Results

At W12 and W52, mirikizumab showed significant improvement in Inflammatory Bowel Disease Questionnaire (IBDQ) total and domain scores (P < .001); 36-Item Short Form Health Survey (SF-36) Physical Component Summary (PCS), Mental Component Summary (MCS), and domain scores (P < .05); EQ-5D-5L scores (P < .001); Work Productivity and Activity Impairment Questionnaire (UC) scores (P < .05); Patient Global Rating of Severity (P < .001); and Patient Global Rating of Change (P < .01) scores. A significantly higher proportion of mirikizumab-treated patients achieved IBDQ response (W12: 72.7% vs 55.8%; W52: 79.2% vs 49.2%; P < .001), IBDQ remission (W12: 57.5% vs 39.8%; W52: 72.3% vs 43.0%; P < .001), and clinically important improvements in PCS (W12: 50.6% vs 41.5%; W52: 61.9% vs 36.9%; P < .01) and MCS (W12: 44.2% vs 37.8%; W52: 51.2% vs 34.6%; P < .05) scores.

Conclusions

Mirikizumab improved QoL in patients with moderately-to-severely active UC in phase 3 LUCENT-1 and LUCENT-2 studies.

Clinical trials registration number

LUCENT-1: NCT03518086; LUCENT-2: NCT03524092.

Unmet Needs in Real-World Advanced Therapy-Naïve and -Experienced Patients with Moderately to Severely Active Ulcerative Colitis in the United States

INTRODUCTION

Despite availability of advanced therapies (ATs) for ulcerative colitis (UC), many patients fail to respond to treatment. This study examined real-world clinical and humanistic outcomes associated with current treatments in patients with UC.

METHODS

This cross-sectional study used US data from the Adelphi Real World Disease Specific Programme for inflammatory bowel disease from before (2017-2018) and during the COVID-19 pandemic (2020-2021). Physicians (gastroenterologists) seeing > 5 patients/month reported patients' disease characteristics, current symptoms and treatments, and reasons for treatment choices for their next seven consecutive patients aged ≥ 18 years with moderately to severely active UC before current treatment. Patients were asked to complete the EQ-5D-5L health-related quality of life (HRQoL) measure. ATs included tumor necrosis factor inhibitors (TNFis), integrin receptor antagonists, interleukin-12/23 antagonists, and Janus kinase inhibitors. Patients were classified as AT-naïve or AT-experienced based on current treatment received for ≥ 8 weeks and further classified as responders or non-responders based on symptoms, disease flare status, and remission. Descriptive analyses are presented.

RESULTS

The 2017-2018 cohort included 92 physicians and 539 patients (208 [38.6%] AT-experienced). The 2020-2021 cohort included 73 physicians and 448 patients (349 [77.9%] AT-experienced). TNFis were the most common ATs. In 2017-2018, 195 (58.9%) AT-naïve and 113 (54.3%) AT-experienced patients were non-responders; in 2020-2021 this was 57 (57.6%) and 182 (52.1%). Efficacy and induction of remission were physicians' most common reasons for AT choice. Dislike of injections/infusions was the most common reason for eligible patients not receiving biologic therapy. Numerically, non-responders (both AT-naïve and AT-experienced) had more symptoms, overall pain and fatigue, and lower HRQoL scores than responders.

CONCLUSIONS

Before (2017-2018) and during the pandemic (2020-2021), over half of patients with UC did not respond to AT. Non-responders carried a high burden of disease. Alternative therapies are urgently needed to treat UC.

Agreement between patients and physicians on scores of inflammatory bowel disease activity and burden assessed on a telemonitoring platform

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Telemonitoring is increasingly used in the management of IBD patients. We investigated the agreement between patients and physicians on scores of disease activity and burden.

METHODS

Consecutive outpatients at one IBD clinic were recruited between February and December 2021. Enrolled patients completed a questionnaire for disease activity (Harvey-Bradshaw Index [HBI] for Crohn's disease or Simple Clinical Colitis Activity Index [SCCAI] for ulcerative colitis) and a test of disease burden (Pictorial Representation of Illness and Self Measure [PRISM]). They did the tests within 5 days of an outpatient visit, working independently on IBD Tool, a new web-based telemonitoring application. Concomitantly, the senior and junior physicians who examined them completed the same tests. The agreement was tested for every pair of scores.

RESULTS

Five hundred and sixty patients (289 Crohn's disease; 271 ulcerative colitis) completed disease questionnaires on IBD Tool (in total, 742 times). By Spearman's correlation, the agreement was substantial both for HBI (rho 0.685-0.837) and SCCAI (rho 0.694-0.888) for comparisons between patients, junior and senior physicians. The agreement was moderate-to-substantial for PRISM (rho 0.406-0.725) for the same comparisons. The correlation between disease activity (HBI/SCCAI) and PRISM scores was substantial for senior (rho 0.757-0.788) or junior (rho 0.746-0.753) physicians and moderate for patients (rho 0.458-0.486). The median PRISM score difference was 2.3-1.6 points lower between patients and senior-junior physicians.

CONCLUSION

Agreement between IBD patients and physicians was substantial for disease activity and moderate for disease impact. The inclusion of disease burden scoring in telemonitoring platforms provides important information for the management of IBD patients.Study highlightsWhat IS known•Continuous response to treatments and patient-reported outcomes became an essential goal for IBD patient management.•The use of tele-monitoring and eHealth technologies allows for regular disease assessments and for managing more efficiently IBD patients; disease questionnaires and tests are key to support eHealth tools.What is new here•Agreement between IBD patients and physicians was substantial for disease activity and moderate for disease burden, while agreement among junior and senior physicians was substantial for both.•PRISM performs as well for ulcerative colitis as for Crohn's patients.•The inclusion of disease burden tests might add to eHealth platforms valuable information, complemental to disease activity questionnaires.

Medical consultation in ulcerative colitis: Key elements for improvement

Ulcerative colitis (UC) is a chronic inflammatory disease with a high impact. In order to improve patient outcomes, the clinician-patient relationship in daily practice is critical. Clinical guidelines provide a framework for UC diagnosis and treatment. However, standard procedures and the medical content focused upon medical consultations in UC patients has not yet been defined. Moreover, UC is a complex disease, given that patient characteristics and patient needs have been proven to vary during clinical consultation since establishing the diagnosis and upon the course of the disease. In this article, we have discussed the key elements and specific objectives to consider in medical consultation, such as diagnosis, first visits, follow-up visits, active disease patients, patients on topical therapies, new treatment initiation, refractory patients, extra-intestinal manifestations, as well as challenging situations. The key elements have been mentioned to comprise effective communication techniques, motivational interviewing (MI), as well as information and educational aspects, or organizational issues. The key elements to be implemented in daily practice were reported to comprise several general principles like duly prepared consultations, in addition to honesty and empathy with patients, as well as effective communication techniques, MI, information and educational points, or organizational issues. The role of other healthcare professionals such as specialized nurses, psychologists, or the use of checklists was also discussed and commented on.

Safety and tolerability of spesolimab in patients with ulcerative colitis

BACKGROUND

Interleukin (IL)-36 signaling has been shown to be increased in ulcerative colitis (UC). Spesolimab, a novel humanized monoclonal antibody, targets the IL-36 pathway.

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS

We report safety, immunogenicity, and efficacy data of intravenous (IV) spesolimab in UC. Study 1: phase II, randomized, placebo-controlled trial (300 mg single dose; 450 mg every 4 weeks [q4w]; or 1,200 mg q4w, three doses). Study 2: phase IIa, randomized, placebo-controlled trial (1,200 mg q4w). Study 3: phase IIa, open-label, single-arm trial (1,200 mg q4w). Studies lasted 12 weeks, with a 12-, 24-, and 16-week safety follow-up, respectively.

RESULTS

Adver+se event (AE) rates were similar for spesolimab and placebo in Studies 1 (N = 98; 64.9%; 65.2%) and 2 (N = 22; 86.7%; 71.4%); all patients in Study 3 (N = 8) experienced AEs. The most frequent investigator-assessed drug-related (spesolimab; placebo) AEs were skin rash (5.4%; 0%) and nasopharyngitis (4.1%; 0%) in Study 1; acne (13.3%; 0%) in Study 2; one patient reported skin rash, nasopharyngitis, headache, and acne in Study 3. Efficacy endpoints were not met.

CONCLUSIONS

Spesolimab was generally well tolerated, with no unexpected safety concerns. The safety data are consistent with studies in other inflammatory diseases.

Methodik und Interpretation retrospektiver vergleichender Krankenkassendatenstudien: Analyse von Patientendaten in einem Fallbeispiel (Teil 2)

Hintergrund

Vergleichende Krankenkassendatenstudien können wichtige Evidenz zur Bewertung der Wirksamkeit und Sicherheit von Therapien in der Versorgungspraxis generieren. Ihre Interpretation ist jedoch angesichts methodischer Unsicherheiten herausfordernd.

Ziel der Arbeit

Ziel dieses Beitrags ist es, auf Basis einer erarbeiteten Systematik für die Methodik von vergleichenden Krankenkassendatenstudien (separater Teil 1) den Einfluss spezifischer methodischer Annahmen und Entscheidungen exemplarisch an einem Beispiel zu erläutern.

Material und Methoden

Verschiedene methodische Optionen wurden für Patienten mit prävalenter Colitis ulcerosa (CU), die eine Therapie mit Vedolizumab vs. Adalimumab starteten, analysiert. Verwendet wurden Daten der AOK PLUS. Verglichen wurde ein „composite endpoint“ (CEP), bestehend aus CU-bezogenen Hospitalisierungen und Operationen, Kortikosteroidverschreibungen, Therapiebeendigung sowie -switch.

Ergebnisse

In der Analyse wurde deutlich, dass spezifische Annahmen in den dargestellten 7 methodischen Dimensionen einen erheblichen Einfluss auf die Ergebnisse einer Studie sowie deren interne und externe Validität haben. Im Beispiel zeigte sich, dass bei Analyse des CEP Vedolizumab eine höhere Wirksamkeit als Adalimumab aufwies.

Schlussfolgerungen

Publikationen zu vergleichenden Krankenkassendatenstudien sollten transparent die getroffenen Annahmen in den 7 genannten Dimensionen darstellen und begründen, warum entsprechende Annahmen getroffen wurden.

Ocular surface disorders affect quality of life in patients with autoimmune blistering skin diseases: a cross-sectional study

Background

Autoimmune blistering skin diseases (AIBD) are a group of rare chronic autoimmune diseases which are associated with ocular surface diseases especially dry eye disease. This study is designed to investigate the relationship between ocular surface disorders and quality of life among patients with autoimmune blistering skin diseases.

Methods

Twenty-four AIBD patients (18 pemphigus and 7 pemphigoid) and twenty-five non-AIBD controls were included. Ocular surface disease index (OSDI), ocular surface evaluation, including slit-lamp examination, Schirmer I test, tear break-up time, corneal fluorescein staining, lid-parallel conjunctival folds, meibomian gland evaluation, presence of symblepharon and corneal opacity were assessed. Life quality was evaluated by multiple questionnaires, including Medical Outcomes Study 36-Item Short Form Questionnaire (SF-36), Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS), Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI) and Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index (HAQ-DI). Ocular surface tests and quality of life were compared between AIBD patients and non-AIBD controls. In the AIBD patients, the associations between ocular surface parameters and quality of life were also evaluated.

Results

92% of AIBD patients and 87.5% of age- and sex-matched non-AIBD controls were diagnosed with dry eye in this study. Compared with non-AIBD controls, AIBD patients reported lower SF-36 scores (P < 0.05) and severer OSDI, Schirmer I test, tear break-up time, corneal fluorescein staining, presence of symblepharon and corneal opacity measures (P < 0.05). OSDI, Schirmer I test were correlated with SF-36 composite scores or scores on the SF-36 subscales.

Conclusions

AIBD patients experience reduced quality of life and more severe ocular surface disorders including dry eye, symblepharon and corneal opacity. Early treatments of dry eye and collaborations among multidisciplinary physicians are necessary in patients with AIBD.

Inadequate Response, Treatment Patterns, Health Care Utilization, and Associated Costs in Patients With Ulcerative Colitis: Retrospective Cohort Study Based on German Claims Data

BACKGROUND

Real-world data regarding response rates in ulcerative colitis treatment are rare, particularly for later lines of therapy. This study aimed to assess continuity of and changes to advanced therapies, as well as costs and specific indicators defining suboptimal therapy.

METHODS

German claims data were retrospectively analyzed (January 2014 to June 2019). Patients with ulcerative colitis initiating an advanced therapy (adalimumab, golimumab, infliximab, tofacitinib, vedolizumab) were included. Inadequate response was indicated by therapy discontinuation, switch, escalation, augmentation, corticosteroid dependency, disease-related hospitalization, or surgery. Health care resource utilization (inpatient, outpatient, sick leaves, medication, aids, and remedies) and related costs were assessed from therapy initiation until discontinuation or loss to follow-up.

RESULTS

Among 574 patients (median age, 39 years; female sex, 53.5%) who initiated advanced therapies, 458 (79.8%) received an antitumor necrosis factor therapy, 113 (19.7%) vedolizumab, and 3 (0.5%) tofacitinib. After 12 months, 75% had ≥1 indicator for suboptimal therapy. The median time to first indicated inadequate response was 4.8 months. Therapy discontinuation (38%), switching (26%), and prolonged use of steroids (36%) were common within the first year of treatment. In an unadjusted comparison, all-cause total costs per person-year were significantly higher in those who switched vs patients remaining on their therapy (€44,570 vs €36,807; P < .001).

CONCLUSIONS

Our study indicates a high prevalence of inadequate response to advanced therapies. Only 25% of patients showed adequate response within 12 months after therapy initiation. Frequent dose and treatment changes were observed. The economic impact of suboptimal therapy in ulcerative colitis is substantial, highlighting the ongoing need for improved treatment strategies.

Quality of Life in Inflammatory Bowel Diseases (IBDs) Patients after Surgery

Inflammatory Bowel Diseases (IBDs) are chronic, relapsing and disabling diseases that affect the gastrointestinal tract. This relapsing course is often unpredictable with severe flares and the need for intensive medical treatment, hospitalization, or emergent/urgent surgery, all of which significantly impact patients' quality of life (QoL). QoL in IBD patients is significantly lower than in the general population, and depression and anxiety have been shown to have a higher prevalence than in healthy individuals, especially during disease flares. Complications requiring hospitalization and repeated surgeries are not uncommon during the disease course and significantly affect QoL in IBD patients. Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) can be used to measure the impact of chronic disease on QoL from the patient's perspective. The use of PROMs in IBD patients undergoing surgery could help to investigate the impact of the surgical procedure on QoL and determine whether there is any improvement or worsening. This review summarizes the use of PROMs to assess QoL after various surgical procedures required for IBD treatment.

Impact of adalimumab on disease burden in moderate-to-severe ulcerative colitis patients: The one-year, real-world UCanADA study

BACKGROUND

A gap remains in documenting the impact of anti-tumor necrosis factor therapy on disease burden in ulcerative colitis (UC) patients treated in a real-world setting. The use of patient-reported outcomes (PROs) has been discussed as a primary endpoint in the context of the FDA PRO Guidance, for labelling purposes. Specifically, the efficacy and safety of adalimumab have been demonstrated in pivotal trials; however, data are needed to understand how clinical results translate into improvements in key aspects of the daily lives of UC patients, such as symptoms, health-related quality of life (HRQoL), and disability.

AIM

To assess real-world effectiveness of adalimumab on PRO measures in patients with moderate-to-severe UC.

METHODS

UCanADA was a single arm, prospective, 1-year multicenter Canadian post-marketing observational study in which multiple PRO questionnaires were completed—with psychologic distress/depression symptoms as the primary endpoint—by patients with moderate-to-severe UC. Assessments were performed during patients’ routine care visit schedule, which was at the initiation of adalimumab (baseline), after induction (approximately 8 wk), and 52 wk after baseline. Additional optional assessments between weeks 8 and 52 were collected at least once but no more than two times during this period. Serious safety events and per-protocol adverse events were collected.

RESULTS

From 23 Canadian centres, 100 patients were enrolled and 48 completed the study. Measured with the Patient Health Questionnaire–9 items at week 52, 61.5% (40/65) [95% confidence interval (CI): 49.7%-73.4%] of the patients improved in psychologic distress/depression symptoms, which was slightly higher in completers [65.9% (29/44); 95%CI: 51.9%-79.9%)]. At week 52, clinical response and clinical remission were achieved respectively by 65.7% (44/73) and 47.8% (32/73) of the patients. The odds of improving depressive symptoms for those achieving a clinical remission at week 52 was 7.94 higher compared with those not achieving a clinical remission (CI: 1.42, 44.41; P = 0.018). Significant changes from baseline to weeks 8 and 52 were observed in disability, HRQoL, and fatigue. Meaningful improvement was reported in work impairment.

CONCLUSION

At week 52, over 60% of the UCanADA patients had depressive symptoms significantly reduced, as well as HRQoL, fatigue symptoms, and work impairment improved. No new safety signals were detected.

Daily life difficulties among patients with ulcerative colitis in Japan and the United Kingdom: A comparative study

The difficulty of life scale (DLS) instrument is used to measure specific life problems in patients with ulcerative colitis (UC). Importantly, health care providers should consider the characteristics of the country in which they support patients with UC. This cross-cultural comparison study investigated DLS among patients with UC in Japan and the United Kingdom (UK). Outpatients attending one hospital in London and one in Osaka were included. We collected patient information using the DLS questionnaire, which comprises 18 items in three domains. Mean differences between Japan and the UK were compared for the total score and each domain of the DLS. Variables with P < .05 in univariate analysis were entered into a multiple regression model. We included 142 patients from Japan and 100 patients from the UK in the analysis. Univariate results showed that UK patients had more difficulties than Japanese patients in all three domains. Multivariate results showed that only "decline of vitality or vigor" showed significantly lower difficulty scores in Japanese patients. Having four or more bowel movements per day, visible bleeding, and being a homemaker or unemployed were significantly associated with greater difficulty according to the DLS total score. The level of daily life difficulties assessed using the DLS was greater among patients in the UK than among Japanese patients. This comparative study between patients with UC in Japan and the UK demonstrated certain country-related features for domain 3, "decline of vitality or vigor," of the DLS. The reasons why UK patients felt greater decline in vitality or vigor may be that these patients may have symptoms other than bowel symptoms; also, Japanese patients are more hesitant to express discomfort. The findings of this study might lead to a better understanding of culturally sensitive perceptions of daily life difficulties in UC.

Disease activity, burden and suffering in patients with ulcerative colitis in the UK cohort recruited into the global ICONIC study

OBJECTIVE

The Understanding the Impact of Ulcerative Colitis and Its Associated Disease Burden on Patients (ICONIC) was a 2-year, global, prospective, observational study assessing disease burden in adults recently diagnosed (≤36 months) with ulcerative colitis (UC) receiving routine outpatient care, irrespective of disease severity or treatment. A subanalysis was conducted to understand the UK perspective.

DESIGN/METHOD

All eligible consenting patients enrolled in ICONIC from the UK were included in the subanalysis of patient-reported and physician-reported outcomes at baseline and year 2 (Y2).

RESULTS

Sixty-three UK patients were included (mean age 43.4 years, 58.7% female). At baseline and Y2, the mean (±SD) Simple Clinical Colitis Activity Index (SCCAI) scores were 3.6 (±3.3) and 1.5 (±1.5); Patient Modified Simple Clinical Colitis Activity Index (P-SSCAI) were 4.9 (±4.0) and 2.6 (±2.6), respectively. Physician-reported Pictorial Representation of Illness and Self Measure (PRISM) median scores (assessing inverse of suffering) were 3.5 (IQR 2.0-6.8) at baseline and 5.5 (IQR 3.6-6.9) at Y2; patient-reported PRISM scores were 4.7 (IQR 2.6-6.9) and 5.4 (IQR 3.2-8.0), respectively. At baseline, SCCAI and P-SCCAI were strongly correlated (r=0.86, p<0.0001), and patient-reported and physician-reported PRISM scores moderately correlated (r=0.67, p<0.0001). At Y2, moderate correlations were observed (SCCAI vs P-SCCAI: r=0.72, p<0.0001; patient-reported vs physician- reported PRISM: r=0.60, p<0.0001). Rating Form of IBD Patient Concerns scores indicated patients' greatest concerns were with energy level, having an ostomy bag and effects of medication (baseline scores >3.0).

CONCLUSIONS

These findings demonstrated the multifaceted burden of disease in patients recently diagnosed with UC in the UK. Agreement between patients and physicians on disease activity/severity varied according to the instrument used.

Mucosal healing and quality of life in therapeutic goals of ulcerative colitis: occurrence and related factors of functional bowel disorder-like symptoms

Background

Mucosal healing (MH) is considered the preferred therapeutic target for ulcerative colitis (UC). Impaired quality of life (QoL), irritable bowel syndrome (IBS)-like symptoms, and functional bowel symptoms have been reported in several inactive patients with UC. This study aims to assess the occurrence of functional bowel disorders (FBD)-like symptoms and QoL in UC patients with MH, and to explore the factors related to FBD-like symptoms.

Methods

UC patients with MH (Mayo endoscopic score, MES = 0 or 1) were required to complete the Rome IV diagnostic questionnaire, the 32-item version of Inflammatory Bowel Disease Questionnaire (IBDQ-32), the 36-item short form healthy survey questionnaire (SF-36), and the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS). UC patients who did not achieve MH (MES > 1) completed the IBDQ-32, the SF-36, and the HADS. Community-dwelling healthy controls (HCs) completed the SF-36 and the HADS.

Results

Among the 119 UC patients with MH recruited, 45.4% reported functional bowel symptoms; functional constipation-like symptom (13.4%) was the most prevalent, followed by IBS-like symptom (10.9%), and functional diarrhea-like symptom (10.0%). The IBDQ-32 and SF-36 scores were significantly lower in MH patients with FBD-like symptoms than in those without FBD-like symptoms. Disease duration [odds ratio (OR): 1.022; p < 0.001], body mass index (BMI; OR: 0.726; p < 0.001) were independent predictors of FBD-like symptoms in UC patients with MH. Combining these two factors could attain area under the curve [0.786; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.701-0.856, p < 0.001] to predict FBD-like symptoms in MH patients.

Conclusion

A number of UC patients with MH had accompanying FBD-like symptoms and significantly impaired QoL. Disease duration, BMI could predict the occurrence of FBD-like symptoms.

Review article: randomised controlled trials in inflammatory bowel disease-common challenges and potential solutions

BACKGROUND

Recruitment rates for Crohn's disease and ulcerative colitis clinical trials continue to decrease annually. The inability to reach recruitment targets and complete trials has serious implications for stakeholders in the inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) community. Action is required to ensure patients with an unmet medical need have access to new therapies to improve the management of their IBD.

AIMS

Identify challenges contributing to recruitment decline in IBD clinical trials and propose potential solutions.

METHODS

PubMed and Google were used to identify literature, regulatory guidelines and conference proceedings related to IBD clinical trials and related concepts. Data on IBD clinical trials conducted between 1989 and 2020 were extracted from the Trialtrove database.

RESULTS

Key aspects that may improve recruitment rates were identified. An increasingly patient-centric approach should be taken to study design including improvements to the readability of key trial documentation and inclusion of patient representatives in trial planning. Placebo is unappealing to patients; approaches including platform trials should be explored to minimise placebo exposure. Non-invasive imaging, biomarkers and novel digital endpoints should continue to be examined to reduce the burden on patients. Reducing the administrative burden associated with trials via the use of electronic signatures, for example, may benefit study sites and investigators. Changes implemented to IBD trials during the COVID-19 pandemic provided examples of how trial conduct can be rapidly and constructively adapted.

CONCLUSIONS

To improve recruitment in Crohn's disease and ulcerative colitis trials, the IBD community should address a broad range of issues related to clinical trial conduct.

Health-related quality of life in patients with long-standing ulcerative colitis in remission

INTRODUCTION

Ulcerative colitis (UC) contributes to impaired health-related quality of life (HRQoL). Although disease activity is the most important factor, reduced HRQoL has been reported even in quiescent UC. We aimed to determine HRQoL, and identify predictors thereof, in patients with long-standing UC in remission.

METHODS

In total, 66 patients with inactive UC were included 10 years after the disease onset. Clinical assessment including rigid sigmoidoscopy was performed to ensure remission. Data on demographic, clinical, treatment-related, and psychological determinants of HRQoL were obtained with a structured interview and self-assessment questionnaires measuring gastrointestinal (GI) and psychological symptoms and fatigue. HRQoL was measured with the Short Form Health Survey (SF-36).

RESULTS

The SF-36 domains were comparable to the general Swedish population, except for Vitality, where UC patients scored lower. Gender, smoking, comorbidity, or disease phenotype had no impact on HRQoL. In contrast, corticosteroid use and sick leave during the previous year were independently associated with Physical Functioning and Bodily Pain domains of SF-36; persisting GI symptoms during remission with Bodily Pain; and fatigue with Role Physical, General Health and Vitality. For all other SF-36 domains reflecting mental HRQoL (Social Function, Role Emotional, Mental Health), only psychological distress contributed uniquely.

CONCLUSIONS

Although overall HRQoL in long-standing UC in remission is comparable to the general population, previous disease activity as well as persisting GI symptoms, fatigue, and psychological distress are associated with a lower HRQoL among these patients. Improved HRQoL may allow for better UC patient health and reduced costs for health care.

Functional outcomes, quality of life, sexual function, and fertility of adult patients undergoing ileo-anal pouch anastomosis in childhood

BACKGROUND

We conducted a questionnaire-based study of pouch function, quality of life, sexual function, and fertility among patients who had undergone ileal pouch anal anastomosis (IPAA) in childhood and who are now more than 18 years old.

METHODS

A consecutive series of patients were asked to complete the following questionnaires: Pouch function score (PFS), short form 36 (SF-36), International index of erectile function (IIEF) (males), and Female sexual function index (FSFI) (females). Fertility in females was also assessed. Data are quoted as a median (SD).

RESULTS

Of 144 patients who had IPAA, 101 were eligible, and 70 responded. Mean age at surgery was 14 years, and mean current age is 26 years. Most patients had either ulcerative colitis or familial adenomatous polyposis. The questionnaire was completed by 38/70 (54%). Median PFS score was 6 (5). SF-36 were lower than previous reports. Median FSFI was 30 (7.6), 84% of possible maximum. Median IIEF was 69, 92% of possible maximum. Successful conception was reported in 5/7 women who had tried. However, there were several miscarriages and two surgical emergencies during pregnancies.

CONCLUSIONS

IPAA can be performed in childhood with similar pouch function to reported adult series. Quality of life appears poorer, but sexual function is maintained. There may be an association with adverse events in pregnancy.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

IV.

Unmet Psychosocial Needs of Patients with Newly Diagnosed Ulcerative Colitis: Results from the Nationwide Prospective Cohort Study in Korea

Background/Aims

Limited data are available regarding psychosocial distress at the time of diagnosis of ulcerative colitis (UC). We investigated the psychosocial burden and factors related to poor health-related quality of life (HRQL) among patients newly diagnosed with moderate-to-severe UC who were affiliated with the nationwide prospective cohort study.

Methods

Within the first 4 weeks of UC diagnosis, all patients were assessed using the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS), Work Productivity and Activity Impairment questionnaire, Inflammatory Bowel Disease Questionnaire (IBDQ), and 12-Item Short Form (SF-12) health survey. A multiple linear regression model was used to identify factors associated with HRQL.

Results

Between August 2014 and February 2017, 355 patients completed questionnaires. Significant mood disorders requiring psychological interventions, defined by a HADS score ≥11, were identified in 16.7% (anxiety) and 20.6% (depression) of patients. Patients with severe disease were more likely to have presenteeism, loss of work productivity, and activity loss than those with moderate disease (all p<0.05). Significant mood disorders had the strongest negative relationship with total IBDQ score, which indicates disease-specific HRQL (β coefficient: –22.1 for depression and –40.0 for anxiety, p<0.001). The scores of all SF-12 dimensions, which indicate general HRQL, were remarkably decreased in the study population compared indirectly with previously reported scores in the general population. The Mayo score, C-reactive protein level, and white blood cell count showed significant negative associations with the IBDQ score (p<0.05).

Conclusions

Psychosocial screening and timely interventions should be incorporated into the initial care of patients newly diagnosed with UC.

Real-world data for golimumab treatment in patients with ulcerative colitis in Japan: interim analysis in post-marketing surveillance

Background/Aims

Golimumab (GLM) is an anti-tumor necrosis factor-α drug approved for treating moderate-to-severe active ulcerative colitis (UC). A 52-week post-marketing surveillance (PMS) was initiated to evaluate its safety and effectiveness in patients with UC in Japan. We present an interim report of the ongoing PMS.

Methods

Patients received 200 mg of subcutaneous GLM at week 0, 100 mg at week 2, and 100 mg 4 weekly thereafter. The safety analysis set included 392 patients with UC, and the effectiveness analysis set 387 patients. Safety and effectiveness were assessed at week 6.

Results

Adverse drug reactions (ADRs) were reported in 8.2% (32/392) and serious ADRs in 4.6% (18/392). The most frequent ADRs were infection and infestation (3.3%), with herpes zoster being the most common. ADRs were significantly higher in patients with concomitant corticosteroid use (odds ratio [OR], 3.45; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.40–9.68). No significant difference in ADR incidence was observed between patients aged ≥65 and <65 years (OR, 1.23; 95% CI, 0.35–3.47). Six-week effectiveness of GLM was confirmed by a decrease in the partial Mayo score (–2.3; 95% CI, –2.6 to –2.1) and C-reactive protein levels (–0.64; 95% CI, –0.92 to –0.36), including in the biologics-experienced population.

Conclusions

The safety and effectiveness of GLM at week 6 in a real-world setting were demonstrated in patients with UC in Japan. ADR patterns were consistent with previous reports with no new safety signals. Concomitant corticosteroid use may be associated with increased ADR incidence. The final results of the ongoing PMS are necessary for further evaluation.

The impact of clinical symptoms and endoscopic and histologic disease activity on health-related quality of life in patients with ulcerative colitis following treatment with multimatrix mesalazine

PURPOSE

Studies of patients with ulcerative colitis (UC) report that reduced clinical symptoms and endoscopic activity predict better health-related quality of life (HRQoL). However, no study has examined the joint and unique associations of clinical and endoscopic activity with HRQoL, nor of histologic inflammation and HRQoL. These post hoc analyses evaluated whether reduced clinical, endoscopic, and histologic disease activity were uniquely associated with improved HRQoL for adults with active mild-to-moderate UC receiving once-daily 4.8 g/day multimatrix mesalazine for 8 weeks.

METHODS

Assessments at baseline and week 8 (i.e., treatment completion) included clinical and endoscopic activity (modified UC-Disease Activity Index), histology (Geboes scoring), and HRQoL (Short Inflammatory Bowel Disease Questionnaire [SIBDQ]; SF-12v2® Health Survey [SF-12v2]). Associations among each type of disease activity and HRQoL were examined by correlations and by mean changes in SIBDQ and SF-12v2 scores between disease activity subgroups (e.g., achievement of clinical remission; mucosal healing). Regression models estimated unique variance in HRQoL accounted by each type of disease activity.

RESULTS

Within the analysis sample (n = 717), patients with reduced clinical and endoscopic activity had significantly larger improvements in all HRQoL domains (p < 0.001), as did patients in both endoscopic and clinical remission compared to patients in endoscopic remission only (p < 0.05). Patients with histologic activity post-treatment scored significantly worse on all HRQoL domains than patients with no activity (p < 0.05). Correlations and regression models found that decreases in clinical and endoscopic activity were associated with improvements in HRQoL domain scores.

CONCLUSIONS

Clinical symptoms and mucosal health have separable, distinct impacts on UC patients' HRQoL.

Quality of life in patients with moderate to severe ulcerative colitis and the impact of treatment: A narrative review

As a chronic inflammatory disease, ulcerative colitis has significant negative impact on the quality of life (QoL) of patients. Since the disease affects many aspects of QoL, comprising multiple domains, treatments that induce and maintain remission can provide benefits beyond hard clinical endpoints. Effective treatment of ulcerative colitis can restore QoL and return it to normal or near normal levels. Biological therapies have shown consistent improvement in the QoL of patients with ulcerative colitis during the induction phase, with benefits that are generally maintained in the long-term. Current medical treatment options broadly comprise aminosalicylates, corticosteroids, thiopurines, and calcineurin inhibitors, as well as biologic therapies. Conventional therapies do not always adequately control disease in a sizeable portion of patients, while anti-TNF antibodies are associated with several issues such as contraindications, intolerance, primary non-response, and loss of response in some patients. JAK inhibitors have been associated with clinical improvements in disease manifestations and long-term improvement in QoL outcomes. However, additional studies are needed to better understand the comparative effects of different treatments on QoL and patient preferences for therapy. Herein, the available evidence is reviewed regarding the impact of various treatments on QoL in patients with moderate to severe ulcerative colitis.

Managing high-priced biologic agents: challenges and potential solutions

DISCLOSURES: No funding was received for the writing of this commentary. The authors report no conflicts of interest.

Patients' Willingness and Perspectives Toward Chimeric Antigen Receptor T-Regulatory Cell Therapy for Inflammatory Bowel Diseases

Background

Inflammatory bowel disease is a life-changing disease resulting from recurrent intestinal inflammation. Current therapies (eg, steroids and biologics) are associated with mild to severe side effects, and none provide a cure. Recent research has focused on genetically engineering gut-specific anti-inflammatory T-regulatory cells (CAR-Tregs) to control intestinal inflammation, a logistically and conceptually complex approach. The purpose of our study was to understand patients' willingness to try CAR-Treg given 2 hypothetical scenarios-in a clinical trial or as a new treatment.

Methods

We surveyed people living with inflammatory bowel disease about their willingness to try CAR-Treg. The online survey was developed using patient focus groups and associated literature. We recruited participants through email and social media. We used descriptive and inferential statistics to analyze closed-ended questions and inductive thematic analysis to analyze open-ended follow-up questions.

Results

Survey participants indicated high willingness to try CAR-Treg therapy in both a clinical trial and as a new treatment. Willingness to try was not correlated with disease state or medication history. Women were less likely than men to indicate willingness to participate in a clinical trial. Participants' reasons for being willing to try CAR-Treg therapy included the wish to change their current treatment and the calling to participate in research. Participants that were not willing to try CAR-Treg mentioned the lack of long-term data and the success of their current therapy.

Conclusions

This is the first study to our knowledge to investigate patient willingness to try CAR-Treg therapy. Our results demonstrate the promise of moving this therapy into clinical practice as most patients indicated willingness to try.

Fecal microbiota transplantation in inflammatory bowel disease patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Objectives

Current evidence on fecal microbiota transplantation for inflammatory bowel disease is inconclusive. We conducted a systematic review to gather evidence on the efficacy and safety of fecal microbiota transplantation for inflammatory bowel disease.

Methods

Systematic searches were conducted in PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science. Clinical remission was considered as the primary endpoint. Pairwise meta-analyses were performed for the randomized controlled studies (Mantel Haenszel, random effects model). Proportion meta-analyses, accounting for weighted pooled rates reported in the interventional studies, were conducted using the mixed effects model. Subgroup analyses considering the type of stool, donor type, and disease subtype were also performed. Cumulative meta-analyses to assess further needs of evidence were conducted.

Results

Sixty studies were included, from which 36 could be synthesized in the quantitative analyses. Pairwise meta-analyses of six controlled trials showed significant differences in favor of fecal microbiota transplantation compared with placebo (clinical remission: RR 1.70 [95% CI 1.12, 2.56]; clinical response: RR 1.68 [95% CI 1.04, 2.72]). An overall clinical remission of 37%, overall clinical response of 54%, and a prevalence of 29% of adverse events were found for the interventional studies. Frozen fecal material and universal donors were related to better efficacy outcomes. In addition, Crohn’s disease patients seemed to benefit more from the procedure.

Conclusions

The comparative analyses demonstrated that frozen fecal material from universal donors may be related to a higher rate of clinical remission, especially for Crohn’s disease.

Living with Ulcerative Colitis Study (LUCY) in England: a retrospective study evaluating healthcare resource utilisation and direct healthcare costs of postoperative care in ulcerative colitis

Objective

Ulcerative colitis (UC) is a lifelong, relapsing-remitting disease. Patients non-responsive to pharmacological treatment may require a colectomy. We estimated pre-colectomy and post-colectomy healthcare resource utilisation (HCRU) and costs in England.

Design/Method

A retrospective, longitudinal cohort study indexing adult patients with UC undergoing colectomy (2009–2015), using linked Clinical Practice Research Datalink/Hospital Episode Statistics data, was conducted. HCRU, healthcare costs and pharmacological treatments were evaluated during 12 months prior to and including colectomy (baseline) and 24 months post-colectomy (follow-up; F-U), comparing baseline/F-U, emergency/elective colectomy and subtotal/full colectomy using descriptive statistics and paired/unpaired tests.

Results

249 patients from 26 165 identified were analysed including 145 (58%) elective and 184 (74%) full colectomies. Number/cost of general practitioner consultations increased post-colectomy (p<0.001), and then decreased at 13–24 months (p<0.05). From baseline to F-U, the number of outpatient visits, number/cost of hospitalisations and total direct healthcare costs decreased (all p<0.01). Postoperative HCRU was similar between elective and emergency colectomies, except for the costs of colectomy-related hospitalisations and medication, which were lower in the elective group (p<0.05). Postoperative costs were higher for subtotal versus full colectomies (p<0.001). At 1–12 month F-U, 30%, 19% and 5% of patients received aminosalicylates, steroids and immunosuppressants, respectively.

Conclusion

HCRU/costs increased for primary care in the first year post-colectomy but decreased for secondary care, and varied according to the colectomy type. Ongoing and potentially unnecessary pharmacological therapy was seen in up to 30% of patients. These findings can inform patients and decision-makers of potential benefits and burdens of colectomy in UC.

Healthcare use, work loss and total costs in incident and prevalent Crohn's disease and ulcerative colitis: results from a nationwide study in Sweden

BACKGROUND

There are limited data on population-wide assessment of cost in Crohn's disease (CD) and ulcerative colitis (UC).

AIM

To estimate the societal cost of actively treated CD and UC in Sweden.

METHODS

We identified 10 117 prevalent CD and 19 762 prevalent UC patients, aged ≥18 years on 1 January 2014 and 4028 adult incident CD cases and 8659 adult incident UC cases (2010-2013) from Swedish Patient Register. Each case was matched to five population comparators. Healthcare costs were calculated from medications, outpatient visits, hospitalisations and surgery. Cost of productivity losses was derived from disability pension and sick leave.

RESULTS

The mean annual societal costs per working-age patient (18-64 years) with CD and UC were $22 813 (vs $7533 per comparator) and $14 136 (vs $7351 per comparator), respectively. In patients aged ≥65 years, the mean annual costs of CD and UC were $9726 and $8072 vs $3875 and $4016 per comparator, respectively. The majority of cost for both CD (56%) and UC (59%) patients originated from productivity losses. Higher societal cost of working-age CD patients as compared to UC patients was related to greater utilisation of anti-TNF (22.2% vs 7.4%) and increased annual disability pension (44 days vs 25 days). Among incident CD and UC patients, the mean total cost over the first year per patient was over three times higher than comparators.

CONCLUSION

In Sweden, the societal cost of incident and prevalent CD and UC patients was consistently two to three times higher than the general population.

A Global, Prospective, Observational Study Measuring Disease Burden and Suffering in Patients with Ulcerative Colitis Using the Pictorial Representation of Illness and Self-Measure Tool

BACKGROUND

The understanding the Impact of ulcerative COlitis aNd Its assoCiated disease burden on patients study [ICONIC] was a 2-year, global, prospective, observational study evaluating the cumulative burden of ulcerative colitis [UC] using the Pictorial Representation of Illness and Self-Measure [PRISM] tool that is validated to measure suffering, but not previously used in UC.

METHODS

ICONIC enrolled unselected outpatient clinic attenders with recent-onset UC. Patient- and physician-reported outcomes including PRISM, the Short Inflammatory Bowel Disease Questionnaire [SIBDQ], the Patient Health Questionnaire [PHQ-9], and the Simple Clinical Colitis Activity Indexes [patient: P-SCCAI; physician: SCCAI] were collected at baseline and follow-up visits every 6 months. Correlations between these measures were assessed using Spearman's rank correlation coefficient.

RESULTS

Overall, 1804 evaluable patients had ≥1 follow-up visit. Over 24 months, mean [SD] disease severity measured by P-SCCAI/SCCAI reduced significantly from 4.2 [3.6]/3.0 [3.0] to 2.4 [2.7]/1.3 [2.1] [p<0.0001]. Patient-/physician-assessed suffering, quantified by PRISM, reduced significantly over 24 months [p<0.0001]. SCCAI/P-SCCAI, and patient-/physician-assessed PRISM, showed strong pairwise correlations [rho ≥0.60, p<0.0001], although physicians consistently underestimated these disease severity and suffering measures compared with patients. Patient-assessed PRISM moderately correlated with other outcome measures, including SIBDQ, PHQ-9, P-SCCAI, and SCCAI (rho = ≤-0.38 [negative correlations] or ≥0.50 [positive correlations], p<0.0001).

CONCLUSION

Over 2 years, disease burden and suffering, quantified by PRISM, improved in patients with relatively early UC. Physicians underestimated burden and suffering compared with patients. PRISM correlated with other measures of illness perception in patients with UC, supporting its use as an endpoint reflecting patient suffering.

Efficacy of biologic therapies for biologic-naïve Japanese patients with moderately to severely active ulcerative colitis: a network meta-analysis

BACKGROUND/AIMS

Several biologic therapies are approved in Japan to treat moderately to severely active ulcerative colitis (UC), but there are no published comparative efficacy studies in a Japanese population. We compared the efficacy of biologics approved in Japan (adalimumab, infliximab, golimumab, and vedolizumab) for treating biologic-naïve patients with UC at their approved doses.

METHODS

A targeted literature review identified 4 randomized controlled trials of biologics for UC in biologicnaïve Japanese patients. For each study, efficacy outcome data from induction (weeks 6-12) and maintenance (weeks 30-60) treatment were extracted for analysis. Treatment effects on clinical response, clinical remission, and mucosal healing relative to the average placebo results across all trials were estimated using network meta-analyses followed by transformation into probabilities and odds ratios (OR).

RESULTS

At the end of induction, the likelihood of clinical response and clinical remission was highest with infliximab (OR: 2.12 and 2.35, respectively) and vedolizumab (OR: 2.10 and 2.32, respectively); the likelihood of mucosal healing was highest with infliximab (OR: 2.24) and adalimumab (OR: 1.86). During maintenance, the likelihood of clinical response and clinical remission was highest with vedolizumab (OR: 6.44 and 4.68, respectively) and golimumab (OR: 5.13 and 3.84, respectively); the likelihood of mucosal healing was significantly higher than placebo with all biologics.

CONCLUSIONS

All active treatments were efficacious compared with placebo. Infliximab and vedolizumab had the highest odds for induction of clinical response, remission, and mucosal healing. Golimumab and vedolizumab had numerically higher odds of achieving efficacy outcomes in the maintenance phase.

Living with ulcerative colitis in Germany: a retrospective analysis of dose escalation, concomitant treatment use and healthcare costs

Aims: To investigate treatment of moderate-to-severe ulcerative colitis (UC) using real-world German health insurance claims data.Materials and methods: A retrospective, longitudinal cohort study was conducted from a German statutory health insurance database for adult patients with UC indexed on biologic therapy initiation (2013-2015). Anonymized data were evaluated for 12 months prior to (baseline) through 24 months after (follow-up) indexing. Biologic dose escalations, steroid and immunosuppressant use, healthcare resource utilization (HCRU) and direct healthcare costs were evaluated, with significant differences assessed across and between index biologics. Descriptive statistics, chi-square or Fisher's exact tests, and analysis of variance were performed.Results: The analysis included 304 patients (adalimumab, n = 125; golimumab, n = 47; infliximab, n = 114; vedolizumab, n = 18). Demographic and clinical characteristics were similar across biologics. Dose escalations occurred in 58% of patients (73% of patients receiving adalimumab), with 41% receiving subsequent de-escalation. Steroids were used during follow-up by 74% of patients; 25% received steroids >14 weeks after indexing. Overall, 41% of patients received an immunosuppressant during follow-up. Steroid and immunosuppressant use were similar across biologics. Total direct healthcare costs were higher during follow-up than baseline and differed significantly across treatments (p < .05), with highest costs for golimumab. Biologic costs contributed to a major portion of follow-up costs. HCRU and costs for most resources were higher in the first 12-month follow-up period than baseline. All resource use except gastroenterology visits returned to, or below, baseline levels 13-24 months post-index date.Limitations: There was potential for inappropriate inclusion/exclusion due to miscoding. Patients may have received biologics >12 months prior to the index date. Biologic originators and biosimilars could not be differentiated.Conclusions: These data suggest that control with current biologics is suboptimal. Further treatment options that provide sustained steroid-free remission for this patient population without the need for dose escalations or concomitant therapies may be warranted.

Dose Escalation Assessment Among Targeted Immunomodulators in the Management of Inflammatory Bowel Disease

BACKGROUND

The need for individualized treatment regimens is becoming more important in the management of patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). Gastroenterologists may dose adjust either by increasing the dose or shortening the dosing interval from the initial recommended maintenance dose to achieve an appropriate clinical response. Understanding the role of dose escalation in the treatment of IBD in clinical practice provides payers in the United States insight into the real-world cost-effectiveness of targeted immunomodulators (TIMs) in the management of IBD.

OBJECTIVE

To assess the prevalence and magnitude of dose escalation for approved IBD therapies.

METHODS

Using the Source Healthcare Analytics database, patients with IBD who initiated treatment with a drug of interest from July 2015 to June 2017 were identified. Patient utilization of the TIMs was tracked for 12 months following initiation. All included patients had at least 2 diagnoses for ulcerative colitis or Crohn disease before TIM initiation and at least 5 claims for a drug of interest within the 12 months following initiation. Dose escalation was defined as an increase of at least 30% in the average daily dose (ADD) relative to the patient's expected maintenance dose on 2 consecutive prescriptions. The proportion of patients with dose escalation in the first 12 months after treatment initiation was determined. The magnitude of dose escalation was determined by calculating the patient's ADD across all noninduction dose claims and comparing it with the expected daily dose. Dose escalation prevalence and magnitude were used to quantify the equivalent patient treatment rate representing the number of patients per 100 that could have been treated with standard dosing, given the prevalence of dose escalation in the treated population.

RESULTS

7,028 patients (2,406 infliximab, 1,966 adalimumab, 1,745 vedolizumab, 472 ustekinumab, 285 certolizumab pegol, and 154 golimumab) met eligibility criteria and were included in the study. Among IBD therapies, dose escalation occurred most frequently with infliximab (39%), followed by adalimumab (28%), vedolizumab (23%), ustekinumab (22%), certolizumab pegol (20%), and golimumab (14%). The magnitude of dose escalation was greatest for ustekinumab (131%), followed by infliximab (70%), vedolizumab (62%), adalimumab (59%), certolizumab pegol (50%), and golimumab (45%). The calculated patient equivalence was highest for infliximab (128) and ustekinumab (128) compared with adalimumab (116), vedolizumab (114), certolizumab pegol (110), and golimumab (106).

CONCLUSIONS

Among patients with IBD, dose escalation occurred with all TIMs examined with varying degrees of prevalence and magnitude. Real-world utilization patterns of TIMs indicate that dose escalation is an important part of the clinical management of IBD and needs to be considered when evaluating the cost-effectiveness of IBD treatments.

DISCLOSURES

Financial support for this study was provided by AbbVie, which participated in study design, research, data collection, analysis and interpretation of data, writing, reviewing, and approving the publication. All authors contributed to the development of the publication and maintained control over the final content. Ehrenberg and McDonald are employees of IQVIA, which received funding from AbbVie to participate in this research. Griffith and Theigs are employed by AbbVie and may own stock or stock options in AbbVie.

The association between disease activity and patient-reported outcomes in patients with moderate-to-severe ulcerative colitis in the United States and Europe

Background

Patients with ulcerative colitis (UC) experience periods of recurring and episodic clinical signs and symptoms. This study sought to establish the association between disease activity and health-related quality of life (HRQoL) and other patient-reported outcomes.

Methods

United States (US) and European Union 5 ([EU5]; i.e., France, Germany, Italy, Spain, and the United Kingdom) data from the 2015 and 2017 Adelphi Inflammatory Bowel Disease-Specific Programme (IBD-DSP) were used. The IBD-DSP is a database of retrospective patient chart information integrated with patient survey data (EuroQoL-5 Dimensions [EQ-5D], Short Quality of Life in Inflammatory Bowel Disease Questionnaire [SIBDQ], and Work Productivity and Activity Impairment-Ulcerative Colitis [WPAI-UC] questionnaire).

Using available chart information, physicians classified their moderate-to-severe patients into one of the following categories: remission with a Mayo endoscopic score = 0 (“deep remission”), remission without a Mayo endoscopic score = 0 (“remission”), or active disease. Differences among disease activity categories with respect to patient-reported outcomes were analyzed using generalized linear models, controlling for confounding variables.

Results

N = 289 and N = 1037 patient charts with linked surveys were included from the US and EU5, respectively. The disease activity distribution was as follows: active disease = 40.1% (US) and 33.6% (EU5); remission = 48.0 and 53.0%; deep remission = 11.9 and 13.3%. Patients with active disease reported significantly lower levels of EQ-5D health state utilities (adjusted mean [AdjM] = 0.87 [US] and 0.78 [EU5]) compared with remission (AdjM = 0.92 and 0.91) and deep remission (AdjM = 0.93 and 0.91) (all P < 0.05 compared with active disease within each region). Similar findings were observed with the scores from the SIBDQ and the WPAI-UC. No significant differences were observed between remission categories.

Conclusions

Among patients with moderate-to-severe UC in the US and EU5, active disease was associated with significant impairments in HRQoL, work and leisure activities. These results reinforce the importance, to both the patient and society, of achieving some level of remission to restore generic and disease-related HRQoL and one’s ability to work productively.

Efficacy and Safety in the Continued Treatment With a Biosimilar Drug in Patients Receiving Infliximab: A Systematic Review in the Context of Decision-Making From a Latin-American Country

Introduction: Biological products, including infliximab (INF), are a therapeutic option for various medical conditions. In the Peruvian Social Security (EsSalud), infliximab is approved for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis, psoriasis, psoriatic arthropathy, ankylosing spondylitis, ulcerative colitis and Crohn’s disease (in cases refractory to conventional treatment). Biosimilars are a safe and effective alternative approved for these diseases in patients who start treatment with infliximab. Nevertheless, there are people in treatment with the biological reference product (BRP), in whom the continuing therapy with a biosimilar biological product (BBP) must be evaluated.

Objectives: To synthesize the best available evidence, calculate a preliminary financial impact and conduct technical discussions about the interchangeability into biosimilar in patients receiving treatment with original infliximab for medical conditions approved in EsSalud.

Methodology: We carried out a systematic review of controlled clinical trials. Primary search was performed in Pubmed- MEDLINE, SCOPUS, WOS, EMBASE, TRIPDATABASE, DARE, Cochrane Library, NICE, AHRQ, SMC, McMaster-PLUS, CADTH, and HSE until June-2018. We used the Cochrane Collaboration tool to assess the risk of bias. Also, we implemented a preliminary financial analysis about the impact of biosimilar introduction on institutional purchasing budget. Moreover, technical meetings with medical doctors specialized in rheumatology, gastroenterology and dermatology were held for discussing findings.

Results: In primary search, 1136 records were identified, and 357 duplicates were removed. From 799 records, we excluded 765 after title and abstract evaluation. From 14 full-text appraised documents, we included five clinical trials in the risk of bias assessment: four studies evaluated CTP-13 and one tested SB2. Two double-blind clinical trials reported no differences in efficacy and safety profiles between maintenance group (INF/INF) and interchangeability group in all diseases included (INF/CTP-13) and rheumatoid arthritis (CTP13 and SB2). In the other three studies, open-label extension of primary clinical trials, no differences were founded in efficacy and safety profiles between CTP-13/CTP-13 and INF/CTP-13 groups. In financial analysis, the inclusion of biosimilars implied savings around S/7´642,780.00 (1USD=S/3.30) on purchasing budget of EsSalud. In technical meetings, beyond certain concerns, specialists agreed with the findings.

Conclusions: Evidence from clinical trials support that there are no differences in efficacy or safety of continuing the treatment with Infliximab BRP or exchanging into its biosimilar in patients with medical conditions approved in EsSalud. Financial analysis shows that the biosimilar introduction produce savings in purchasing institutional budget. Therefore, based on cost-opportunity principle, exchanging into biosimilar in patients receiving the original Infliximab, is a valid therapeutic alternative in the Peruvian Social Security.

Tofacitinib for the treatment of moderately to severely active ulcerative colitis: a systematic review, network meta-analysis and economic evaluation

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

In the UK, treatments for patients with moderately to severely active ulcerative colitis who have an inadequate response to conventional therapies comprise four biological therapies-the tumour necrosis factor inhibitor (TNFi) agents adalimumab, golimumab and infliximab and the anti-integrin vedolizumab-and an orally administered small molecule therapy, tofacitinib. However, there have been few head-to-head studies of these therapies. This study aimed to compare the clinical and cost-effectiveness of tofacitinib with biological therapies.

METHODS

A systematic literature review was conducted to identify all relevant randomised controlled trial (RCT) evidence. Clinical response, clinical remission and serious infection rates were synthesised using network meta-analysis (NMA). The results were used to compare the cost-effectiveness of tofacitinib and biologics with conventional therapy, using a Markov model, which incorporated lifetime costs and consequences of treatment from a UK National Health Service perspective. Analyses were conducted separately for TNFi-naïve and TNFi-exposed populations.

RESULTS

Seventeen RCTs were used in the NMAs. There were no statistically significant differences among biological therapies and tofacitinib for either TNFi-naïve or TNFi-exposed patients. In TNFi-naïve patients, all therapies were more efficacious than placebo. In TNFi-exposed patients, only tofacitinib was significantly more efficacious than placebo as induction therapy, and only tofacitinib and vedolizumab were significantly more efficacious than placebo as maintenance therapies. There were no significant differences in serious infection rates among therapies. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratios for tofacitinib versus conventional therapy were £21 338 and £22 816 per quality-adjusted life year (QALY) in the TNFi-naïve and TNFi-exposed populations, respectively. TNFi therapies were dominated or extendedly dominated in both populations. Compared with vedolizumab, tofacitinib was associated with a similar number of QALYs, at a lower cost.

CONCLUSION

Tofacitinib is an efficacious treatment for moderately to severely active ulcerative colitis and is likely to be a cost-effective use of NHS resources.

Systematic review with network meta-analysis: the impact of medical interventions for moderate-to-severe ulcerative colitis on health-related quality of life

BACKGROUND

Patient-reported outcomes are important in the assessment of efficacy of intervention for ulcerative colitis (UC).

AIM

To compare the impact of interventions for moderate-to-severe UC on health-related quality of life (HRQL).

METHODS

We searched Medline, Embase, CENTRAL and grey literature sources through October 2017. We included randomised controlled trials (RCTs) that compared infliximab, adalimumab, golimumab, vedolizumab or tofacitinib to each other or placebo. Outcomes included the change in quality of life scores and the proportion of patients with improvement in quality of life. We performed random-effect pairwise and network meta-analysis. We assessed confidence in estimates using the CINeMA (Confidence in Network Meta-Analysis) framework.

RESULTS

Fourteen RCTs assessed HRQL using the Inflammatory Bowel Disease Questionnaire (IBDQ) (14 trials), the Short Form questionnaire-36 (SF-36) (seven trials) or the European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions questionnaire (EQ-5D) (three trials). At induction (13 trials), low to very low confidence evidence suggested that all agents significantly improved both generic and disease-specific HRQL scores compared to placebo. However, only infliximab (MD 18.58; 95% CI 13.19-23.97) and vedolizumab (MD 18.00; 95% CI 11.08-24.92) showed clinically meaningful improvement in IBDQ score. Differences among individual interventions were imprecise. For maintenance (four trials), very low confidence evidence suggested that vedolizumab, tofacitinib and adalimumab maintained improvement in HRQL.

CONCLUSIONS

Induction treatment with infliximab, adalimumab, golimumab, vedolizumab or tofacitinib improves quality of life compared to placebo. Evidence on maintenance therapy is sparse and uncertain. Head-to-head comparisons could enhance confidence in conclusions about differences between drugs in terms of HRQL.