DUBLIN [Degree of Ulcerative colitis Burden of Luminal Inflammation] Score, a Simple Method to Quantify Inflammatory Burden in Ulcerative Colitis

Association between pan-immune inflammatory value and ulcerative colitis

OBJECTIVE

Ulcerative colitis is a chronic idiopathic disease that causes inflammation of the colon and rectum, progressing with relapses and remissions. Systemic inflammatory index (SII) and pan-immune inflammatory value (PIV) are newly developed biomarkers. There are many studies in the literature showing the relationship between SII and PIV with malignancies and inflammatory diseases. In this study we aimed to determine the relationship between SII and PIV with the activity of ulcerative colitis.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

146 Ulcerative colitis patients were retrospectively investigated by the time of diagnosis based on clinical, endoscopic and histolopathological findings. Patients and healthy individuals SII and PIV levels were calculated and compared with each other; and Mayo, DUBLIN, UCIES endoscopic subscores of patients were also obtained. Roc curve analysis were used to determine the cut-off value for PIV.

RESULTS

SII (468.6 ± 203.5 vs. 823.1 ± 555.1; p < .001), PIV (288.2 ± 159.9 vs. 912.2 ± 924.1; p < .001), were statistically different between groups. PIV (OR: 1.157; (1.041-1.432), p = .036), was also observed to be the independent predictor of ulcerative colitis. The best cut off value of PIV in the prediction of ulcerative colitis was ≥ 506 with 89.6% sensitivity and 63.7% specificity (AUC = 0.812; 95% CI 0.763-0.854, p < .001).

CONCLUSION

Based on the results of our study, we found that SII and PIV levels were significantly increased in ulcerative colitis patients at the time of diagnosis and were associated with disease severity in the endoscopic scores RACHMILEWITZ, UCEIS and DUBLIN scores, but not for MES score.

Accuracy of the Pancolonic Modified Mayo Score in predicting the long-term outcomes of ulcerative colitis: a promising scoring system

Background

Different endoscopic scoring systems for assessing ulcerative colitis (UC) severity are available. However, most of them are not correlated with disease extent.

Objectives

Our study aimed to compare the predictive value of the PanMay score versus the endoscopic Mayo (MES), Ulcerative Colitis Endoscopic Index of Severity (UCEIS), and Dublin score in predicting long-term outcomes of UC.

Design

This retrospective study enrolled consecutive UC patients who underwent colonoscopy before at least a 3-year follow-up.

Methods

The PanMayo, MES, UCEIS, and Dublin scores and the baseline clinical and demographic characteristics of the participants were assessed. Endpoints were disease flare that required novel biological therapy, colectomy, and hospitalization. Patients were stratified using baseline clinical activity.

Results

Approximately 62.8% of the 250 enrolled patients were in clinical remission. In these patients, the PanMayo, MES, and Dublin scores were positively associated with the risk of clinical flare. The MES score increased with clinical flare. The PanMayo score (>12 points), but not the MES score, was associated with the need for novel biological initiation and biological escalation. Furthermore, the Dublin and UCEIS scores of patients in remission who need novel biological treatment had a similar trend. Colectomy risk was associated with PanMayo and Dublin scores.

Conclusion

The combined endoscopic assessment of disease extent and severity can be more accurate in predicting outcomes among patients with UC. PanMayo score can be utilized in addition to the existing scoring systems, thereby leading to a more accurate examination.

Summary

UC endoscopic scores do not assess extension. Our study aimed to analyze the predictive value of the PanMayo score. Based on 250 patients, results showed that the long-term disease outcomes of UC could be predicted with the PanMayo score more accurately.

Development and validation of a blood routine-based extent and severity clinical decision support tool for ulcerative colitis

Monitoring extent and severity is vital in the ulcerative colitis (UC) follow-up, however, current assessment is complex and low cost-effectiveness. We aimed to develop a routine blood-based clinical decision support tool, Jin's model, to investigate the extent and severity of UC. The multicentre retrospective cohort study recruited 975 adult UC inpatients and sub-grouped into training, internal validation and external validation set. Model was developed by logistics regression for the extent via Montreal classification and for the severity via Mayo score, Truelove and Witts score (TWS), Mayo endoscopic score (MES) and Degree of Ulcerative colitis Burden of Luminal Inflammation (DUBLIN) score. In Montreal classification, left-sided and extensive versus proctitis model achieved area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) of 0.78 and 0.81 retrospectively. For severity, Mayo score model, TWS model, MES model and DUBLIN score model achieved an AUROC of 0.81, 0.70, 0.74 and 0.70 retrospectively. The models also were evaluated with satisfactory calibration and clinical unity. Jin's model was free with open access at http://jinmodel.com:3000/ . Jin's model is a noninvasive, convenient, and efficient approach to assess the extent and severity of UC.

CB-HRNet: A Class-Balanced High-Resolution Network for the evaluation of endoscopic activity in patients with ulcerative colitis

Endoscopic evaluation is the key to the management of ulcerative colitis (UC). However, there is interobserver variability in interpreting endoscopic images among gastroenterologists. Furthermore, it is time-consuming. Convolutional neural networks (CNNs) can help overcome these obstacles and has yielded preliminary positive results. We aimed to develop a new CNN-based algorithm to improve the performance for evaluation tasks of endoscopic images in patients with UC. A total of 12,163 endoscopic images from 308 patients with UC were collected from January 2014 to December 2021. The training set and test set images were randomly divided into 37,515 and 3191 after excluding possible interference and data augmentation. Mayo Endoscopic Subscores (MES) were predicted by different CNN-based models with different loss functions. Their performances were evaluated by several metrics. After comparing the results of different CNN-based models with different loss functions, High-Resolution Network with Class-Balanced Loss achieved the best performances in all MES classification subtasks. It was especially great at determining endoscopic remission in UC, which achieved a high accuracy of 95.07% and good performances in other evaluation metrics with sensitivity 92.87%, specificity 95.41%, kappa coefficient 0.8836, positive predictive value 93.44%, negative predictive value 95.00% and area value under the receiver operating characteristic curve 0.9834, respectively. In conclusion, we proposed a new CNN-based algorithm, Class-Balanced High-Resolution Network (CB-HRNet), to evaluate endoscopic activity of UC with excellent performance. Besides, we made an open-source dataset and it can be a new benchmark in the task of MES classification.

Current and emerging biomarkers for ulcerative colitis

INTRODUCTION

Ulcerative colitis (UC) is a chronic illness requiring lifelong management that could be enhanced by personalizing care using biomarkers.

AREAS COVERED

The main biomarker discovery modalities are reviewed, highlighting recent results across the spectrum of applications, including diagnostics (serum anti-αvβ6 antibodies achieving an area under the curve [AUC] = 0.99; serum oncostatin M AUC = 0.94), disease activity assessment (fecal calprotectin and serum trefoil factor 3: AUC > 0.90), prognostication of the need for treatment escalation (whole blood transcriptomic panels and CLEC5A/CDH2 ratio: AUC > 0.90), prediction of treatment response, and early identification of patients with subclinical disease. The use of established biomarkers is discussed, along with new evidence regarding autoantibodies, proteins, proteomic panels, transcriptomic signatures, deoxyribonucleic acid methylation patterns, and UC-specific glycomic and metabolic disturbances.

EXPERT OPINION

Novel biomarkers will pave the way for optimized UC care. However, validation, simplification, and direct clinical translation of complex models may prove challenging. Currently, few candidates exist to assess key characteristics, such as UC susceptibility, histological disease activity, drug response, and long-term disease behavior. Further research will likely not only reveal new tools to tackle these issues but also contribute to understanding UC pathogenesis mechanisms.

Increased modified DUBLIN scores are associated with serious ulcerative colitis and treatment failure

BACKGROUND

Grading of endoscopic lesions is important for determining the severity of ulcerative colitis and developing treatment strategies, but the commonly used methods are not sufficient.

OBJECTIVES

This study aimed to investigate whether new endoscopic scoring systems incorporating lesions and disease extent are associated with clinical disease severity and maintainable remission.

DESIGN

This was a retrospective study. In all, 110 patients with ulcerative colitis were included and 87 completed 12-month follow-up.

METHODS

Colonoscopy was performed within 1 week before blood samples were taken. Degree of ulcerative colitis burden of luminal inflammation (DUBLIN) scores were calculated as the product of Mayo endoscopic score (MES) by disease extent and ulcerative colitis endoscopic index of severity was used to replace MES when calculating modified DUBLIN scores.

RESULTS

DUBLIN and modified DUBLIN scores were increased in the moderate and severe groups significantly (p < 0.05). Both of increased scores contributed to the detection of serious diseases, and the clinical cutoff values of DUBLIN and modified DUBLIN were 3[area under the curve (AUC) = 0.809, p = 0.001) and 7(AUC = 0.815, p = 0.001), respectively. They were with high sensitivity, but the specificity of DUBLIN was lower. Both scores were correlated to partial Mayo scores, C-reactive protein and erythrocyte sedimentation rate positively, and they were correlated to the albumin negatively (p < 0.05). Higher modified DUBLIN scores (>7) were associated with an increased risk of treatment failure (hazard ratio = 4.96, 95% confidence interval: 1.17-21.00, p = 0.03), but there were no association between DUBLIN scores and long-term remission (p > 0.05).

CONCLUSION

Increased DUBLIN and modified DUBLIN scores were conducive to screening serious disease, but only modified DUBLIN scores had the potential to assist in making an upgraded therapeutic schedule.

Histologic healing and factors associated with complete remission following conventional treatment in ulcerative colitis

BACKGROUND

Endoscopic and histological activity scores in ulcerative colitis (UC) are associated with clinical outcomes and have become important targets of clinical trials. However, these endpoints have been scarcely investigated in patients receiving only conventional treatment.

OBJECTIVE

We aimed to assess the deep and complete remission rates after 3 months of conventional treatment in patients with newly diagnosed UC with moderate to severe endoscopic activity. We also aimed to investigate whether selected clinical and biochemical variables at baseline were associated with complete remission status after 3 months.

DESIGN

This was a prospective cohort study.

METHODS

Newly diagnosed patients with active UC commencing 5-aminosalicylate, corticosteroid, and/or azathioprine treatment were consecutively included. Clinical, biochemical, endoscopic, and histological data were collected at baseline and after 3 months. Rates of clinical remission (Partial Mayo Score ⩽ 2), mucosal healing (Mayo Endoscopic Score ⩽ 1), and histologic healing (Nancy Index ⩽ 1) were determined. Deep remission was assessed as clinical remission plus mucosal healing and complete remission as deep remission plus histologic healing. Predictors of complete remission were identified by logistic regression.

RESULTS

A total of 180 patients were included in the study. Deep remission and complete remission occurred in 62.8% and 42.2% of patients, respectively. Thus, of patients in deep remission one-third had persistent histologic activity. Histologic activity in mucosally healed patients was associated with higher symptom scores and faecal calprotectin levels. Of baseline variables, less endoscopic distribution and disease activity showed strongest association with achieving complete remission, and limited distribution in combination with moderate activity gave highest odds for complete remission (odds ratio: 4.1, 95% confidence interval: 7.69-2.18).

CONCLUSION

In patients with mucosal healing, persistent histologic activity was a common finding and was associated with increased disease activity. Pancolitis and severe inflammatory activity at baseline were associated with lower complete remission rates.

[Improved Mayo Endoscopic Score has a higher value for evaluating clinical severity of ulcerative colitis]

OBJECTIVE

To assess the value of Improved Mayo Endoscopic Score (IMES) for evaluation of the clinical severity of ulcerative colitis (UC).

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed the clinical and endoscopic data of 167 patients diagnosed with UC in Beijing Tsinghua Changgung Hospital from January, 2015 to November, 2021. The severity of endoscopic lesions was determined by Mayo Endoscopic Score (MES, 0-3 points) and the Ulcerative Colitis Endoscopic Index of Severity (UCEIS) score (0-8 points), and the scope of endoscopic lesions was evaluated based on the Montreal classification system. The IMES was established by combining the MES with the Montreal classification.

RESULTS

The IMSE showed stronger correlations with modified Truelove and Witts Disease Severity, Mayo score and partial Mayo score (r=0.712, 0.784, and 0.703, respectively) than MES (r=0.642, 0.754, and 0.604, respectively), Montreal classification (r=0.598, 0.628, and 0.603, respectively) and UCEIS (r= 0.670, 0.767, and 0.677, respectively). ROC curve analysis showed that IMES was superior to MES, Montreal and UCEIS in diagnosis of severe and moderate- to-severe UC. IMES also showed stronger correlations with the laboratory indicators including CRP (r=0.583), WBC (r=0.235), HB (r=-0.280), PLT (r=0.352), ALB (r=-0.396) and ESR (r=0.471) than MES and Montreal classification. An IMES score of 5 was of greater value than a MES score of 3, E3, and UCEIS≥6 for predicting the administration of systemic hormones, immunosuppressants, or surgery in the near future.

CONCLUSION

IMES can better reflect the clinical severity of UC and has good correlations with the laboratory indicators of the patients.

What Does Disease Progression Look Like in Ulcerative Colitis, and How Might It Be Prevented?

Ulcerative colitis (UC) has been characterized by inflammation limited to the mucosa. Although sustained and durable remission has been associated with mucosal healing, the recurrent phenomenon of persistent clinical disease activity despite mucosal healing has been observed in clinical practice and across pivotal trials. Over time, UC appears to confer an increased risk of progression, defined as changes of disease phenotype; adverse transmural effects on the bowel wall; increased risk of neoplasia development; worsening colorectal function; and increased risk of colectomy, hospitalizations, and other extraintestinal comorbidities. Although the treatment paradigm for Crohn's disease has shifted toward early aggressive intervention to prevent disease progression and irreversible bowel damage, such urgency in efforts to halt disease progression in UC have been largely overlooked. This review summarizes the multiple facets of UC contributing to a modified perception of the disease as a progressive one. We propose further study of the natural history and priorities for further treatment goals that include these considerations.

Intestinal Ultrasonography as a Tool for Monitoring Disease Activity in Patients with Ulcerative Colitis

BACKGROUND

Ultrasonography is a noninvasive, inexpensive, and widely available diagnostic tool. In the last two decades, the development of ultrasound techniques and equipment has significantly increased the usage of intestine ultrasound (US) in the assessment of the gastrointestinal tract in patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). Although current guidelines suggest routine utilization of US in patients with Crohn's disease, data regarding US usage in ulcerative colitis are still scarce. We aimed to assess the reliability of intestinal ultrasonography in the assessment of disease activity and extension of patients with ulcerative colitis.

METHODS

Fifty-five patients with a histologically confirmed diagnosis of ulcerative colitis, treated at University Clinical Center of Serbia in the period from 2019 to 2022 were included in this retrospective observational study. The data were obtained from the patient's medical records including history, laboratory, US, and endoscopy findings. US examined parameters were as following: bowel wall thickness (BWT), presence of fat wrapping, wall layer stratification, mesenteric hypertrophy, presence of enlarged mesenteric lymph nodes, and absence or presence of ascites.

RESULTS

Our results suggest that there is a strong correlation of BWT and colonoscopy findings regarding disease extension (r = 0.524, p=0.01, p < 0.05). Furthermore, our results have shown a statistically significant correlation of BWT with the Mayo endoscopic score (r = 0.434, p=0.01, p < 0.05), disease activity score (r = 0.369,p=0.01, p < 0.05), degree of ulcerative colitis burden of luminal inflammation (r = 0.366, p=0.01, p < 0.05), and Geboes index (r = 0.298, p=0.027, p < 0.05). Overall accuracy of US for disease extension and activity was statistically significant (p < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Our results suggest that US is a moderately accurate method for the assessment of disease activity and localization in patients with UC.

Comparing the clinical application values of the Degree of Ulcerative Colitis Burden of Luminal Inflammation (DUBLIN) score and Ulcerative Colitis Endoscopic Index of Severity (UCEIS) in patients with ulcerative colitis

Background

The significance of endoscopic evaluation in the diagnosis and management of ulcerative colitis (UC) has been widely recognized. Over the years, scholars have established several endoscopic scores. Herein, we assessed the clinical application value of the Mayo Endoscopic Subscore (Mayo ES), the Degree of Ulcerative Colitis Burden of Luminal Inflammation (DUBLIN) score, and the Ulcerative Colitis Endoscopic Index of Severity (UCEIS) score in UC patients, by comparing their correlation with disease activity and their predictive potential for treatment response and clinical outcomes.

Methods

UC patients hospitalized from September 2015 to September 2019 were retrospectively analysed. We employed Spearman's rank correlation coefficient to assess the linear association of the assessed endoscopic scores with the clinical parameters. The receiver-operating characteristic curve was applied to evaluate the predictive capabilities of the endoscopic scores for treatment escalation and 1-year readmission.

Results

A total of 178 patients were enrolled; most of them (82%) suffered moderate or severe colitis. Among them, 48 (27%) patients received treatment escalation and 59 (33%) were readmitted within 1 year. The DUBLIN and UCEIS scores demonstrated higher correlations with clinical parameters than the Mayo ES. The DUBLIN scores significantly differed between patients with mild, moderate, and severe colitis (all P < 0.001). The UCEIS scores demonstrated the best predictabilities for treatment escalation and 1-year readmission with an area under the curve of 0.88 and 0.75, respectively. Compared to the UCEIS and DUBLIN scores, the predictive capabilities of the Mayo ES for treatment escalation (both P < 0.001) and 1-year readmission (P < 0.001 and P = 0.002, respectively) were lower. The UCEIS scores exhibited a significant difference between the steroid-responsive group and the steroid-dependent or steroid-refractory group (both P < 0.001), while no significant differences in the Mayo ES and DUBLIN scores were found among the three groups (both P > 0.05).

Conclusion

This study demonstrates that both the DUBLIN and UCEIS scores outperform the Mayo ES in assessing disease severity and predicting treatment response and clinical outcomes in UC patients.

Endoscopy and central reading in inflammatory bowel disease clinical trials: achievements, challenges and future developments

Central reading, that is, independent, off-site, blinded review or reading of imaging endpoints, has been identified as a crucial component in the conduct and analysis of inflammatory bowel disease clinical trials. Central reading is the final step in a workflow that has many parts, all of which can be improved. Furthermore, the best reading algorithm and the most intensive central reader training cannot make up for deficiencies in the acquisition stage (clinical trial endoscopy) or improve on the limitations of the underlying score (outcome instrument). In this review, academic and industry experts review scoring systems, and propose a theoretical framework for central reading that predicts when improvements in statistical power, affecting trial size and chances of success, can be expected: Multireader models can be conceptualised as statistical or non-statistical (social). Important organisational and operational factors, such as training and retraining of readers, optimal bowel preparation for colonoscopy, video quality, optimal or at least acceptable read duration times and other quality control matters, are addressed as well. The theory and practice of central reading and the conduct of endoscopy in clinical trials are interdisciplinary topics that should be of interest to many, regulators, clinical trial experts, gastroenterology societies and those in the academic community who endeavour to develop new scoring systems using traditional and machine learning approaches.

Effective immune-inflammation index for ulcerative colitis and activity assessments

BACKGROUND

The inverse association between systemic immune-inflammation index (SII) and overall survival in tumors has been studied.

AIM

To evaluate the hematological indexes for assessing the activity of ulcerative colitis (UC).

METHODS

In this case-control study, 172 UC patients and healthy participants were included. Comparisons were made among groups of white blood cells, hemoglobin, platelets, neutrophils, lymphocytes, monocytes, SII, neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), and platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR). The relationship with hematological inflammation was verified by Spearman correlation analyses. The efficiency of SII, NLR, and PLR for distinguishing between UC and severe disease status was assessed by the receiver operator curve and logistic regression analyses.

RESULTS

The values of SII, NLR, and PLR were higher in UC patients than in controls (P < 0.001) and were positively correlated with the Mayo endoscopic score, extent, Degree of Ulcerative Colitis Burden of Luminal Inflammation (DUBLIN) score, and Ulcerative Colitis Endoscopic Index of Severity (UCEIS). The cut-off NLR value of 562.22 predicted UC with a sensitivity of 79.65% and a specificity of 76.16%. Logistic regression analysis revealed that patients with SII and NLR levels above the median had a significantly higher risk of UC (P < 0.05). Risk factors independently associated with DUBLIN ≥ 3 included SII ≥ 1776.80 [odds ratio (OR) = 11.53, P = 0.027] and NLR value of 2.67-4.23 (OR = 2.96, P = 0.047) on multivariate analysis. Compared with the first quartile, SII ≥ 1776.80 was an independent predictor of UCEIS ≥ 5 (OR = 18.46, P = 0.012).

CONCLUSION

SII has a certain value in confirming UC and identifying its activity.

The Degree of Ulcerative Colitis Burden of Luminal Inflammation score is superior to predicting medium- to long-term prognosis in patients with active ulcerative colitis

AIMS

The endoscopic evaluation is crucial for the management and treatment of ulcerative colitis (UC). Currently, the Mayo Endoscopic Score (MES) and the Ulcerative Colitis Endoscopic Index of Severity (UCEIS) are two major endoscopic score systems to evaluate the status of mucosal inflammation and disease activity. However, in both MES and UCEIS systems, the disease extent is not included. The Degree of Ulcerative Colitis Burden of Luminal Inflammation (DUBLIN) score is a simple clinical score which is calculated as a product of the MES (0-3) and the extent of disease (E1-E3). The objective of this study was to compare the correlation among DUBLIN, UCEIS and MES, and also investigate the clinical characteristics for predicting treatment failure in patients with active UC.

METHODS

Between March 2015 and April 2019, 172 patients who were previously diagnosed with UC and had undergone colonoscopy were recruited in this study. We retrospectively reviewed the endoscopic scores and clinical characteristics at the time of the colonoscopy and assessed the prognosis of the patients. Endoscopic response was defined as the decrease in MES ⩾1 grade.

RESULTS

DUBLIN showed significant correlation with MES (r = 0.748) and partial Mayo score (pMayo) (r = 0.707), and moderately correlated with CRP (r = 0.590). UCEIS also showed strong correlation with MES (r = 0.712) but moderate correlation with pMayo (r = 0.609) and CRP (r = 0.588). Compared with the UCEIS (cut-off value: 4; sensitivity: 75.73%), DUBLIN score (cut-off value: 4; sensitivity: 86.41%) showed higher diagnostic sensitivity than UCEIS score (McNemar test, p < 0.05). Furthermore, a multivariate analysis also revealed that DUBLIN ⩾4 was the independent factor for predicting treatment failure for UC (p < 0.001, odds ratio: 1.547; 95% confidence interval: 1.32-1.88).

CONCLUSION

The DUBLIN score shows superior diagnostic performances in terms of sensitivity value compared with the UCEIS. Moreover, multivariate analysis indicates that DUBLIN ⩾4 is an independent factor for predicting medium- to long-term treatment failure in active UC patients.

Endoscopic and histologic activity assessment considering disease extent and prediction of treatment failure in ulcerative colitis

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

DUBLIN score allows evaluation of disease activity and extent in ulcerative colitis (UC). This study aimed to evaluate DUBLIN score as a predictor of therapeutic failure as well as to associate endoscopic and histological activity scores to assess their joint performance.

METHODS

Retrospective cohort study, with consecutive inclusion of patients undergoing total colonoscopy with serial biopsies between 2016 and 2019. DUBLIN score (0-9) was calculated as the product of Mayo endoscopic score (MSe 0-3) by disease extent (E1-E3). Histological activity was evaluated through Nancy score (0-4). Activity scores were correlated with biomarkers, treatment failure (therapeutic escalation, hospitalization and/or colectomy) and clinical remission at 6 months (Mayo partial score ≤ 1).

RESULTS

One-hundred and seven patients were included. In 38.3% (n = 41) there was evidence of endoscopic activity (MSe ≥ 2) and in 50.5% (n = 54) histological activity (Nancy ≥ 2). MSe and DUBLIN scores showed good correlation (r = 0.943; p < .001) and both were significantly higher in patients with histological activity (p < .001). Therapeutic failure occurred in 25.2% (n = 27). MSe, DUBLIN, and Nancy scores were significantly associated with therapeutic failure (p < .001). The areas under the (AUC) ROC curve were 0.74 (MSe; p < .001), 0.78 (DUBLIN; p < .001) and 0.84 (Nancy; p < .001). Joint evaluation of endoscopic and histological activity by combining DUBLIN and Nancy scores was associated with therapeutic failure with a significantly higher AUC of 0.84 (p < .001) compared to the Dublin score alone (p = .003).

CONCLUSION

Mayo and DUBLIN endoscopic scores correlated with each other and with histological activity. The joint evaluation of endoscopic and histological activity allowed to predict with greater accuracy treatment failure.

The management of the hospitalized ulcerative colitis patient: the medical-surgical conundrum

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

In this review article, we address emerging evidence for the medical and surgical treatment of the hospitalized patient with ulcerative colitis.

RECENT FINDINGS

Ulcerative colitis is a chronic inflammatory disease involving the colon and rectum. About one-fifth of patients will be hospitalized from ulcerative colitis, and about 20-30%, experiencing an acute flare will undergo colectomy. Because of the significant clinical consequences, patients hospitalized need prompt evaluation for potential complications, stratification of disease severity, and a multidisciplinary team approach to therapy, which involves both the gastroenterologist and surgeon. Although corticosteroids remain first-line therapy, second-line medical rescue options, primarily infliximab or cyclosporine, are considered within 3-5 days of presentation. In conjunction, an early surgical consultation to present the possibility of a staged proctocolectomy as one of the therapeutic options is equally important.

SUMMARY

A coordinated multidisciplinary, individualized approach to treatment, involving the patient preferences throughout the process, is optimal in providing patient-centered effective care.